Slashdot Mirror


Fake Bomb Detector, Blamed For Hundreds of Deaths, Is Still In Use

HughPickens.com writes: Murtaza Hussain writes at The Intercept that although it remains in use at sensitive security areas throughout the world, the ADE 651 is a complete fraud and the ADE-651's manufacturer sold it with the full knowledge that it was useless at detecting explosives. There are no batteries in the unit and it consists of a swivelling aerial mounted to a hinge on a hand-grip. The device contains nothing but the type of anti-theft tag used to prevent stealing in high street stores and critics have likened it to a glorified dowsing rod.

The story of how the ADE 651 came into use involves the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. At the height of the conflict, as the new Iraqi government battled a wave of deadly car bombings, it purchased more than 7,000 ADE 651 units worth tens of millions of dollars in a desperate effort to stop the attacks. Not only did the units not help, the device actually heightened the bloodshed by creating "a false sense of security" that contributed to the deaths of hundreds of Iraqi civilians. A BBC investigation led to a subsequent export ban on the devices.

The device is once again back in the news as it was reportedly used for security screening at hotels in the Egyptian resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh where a Russian airliner that took off from that city's airport was recently destroyed in a likely bombing attack by the militant Islamic State group. Speaking to The Independent about the hotel screening, the U.K. Foreign Office stated it would "continue to raise concerns" over the use of the ADE 651. James McCormick, the man responsible for the manufacture and sale of the ADE 651, received a 10-year prison sentence for his part in manufacture of the devices, sold to Iraq for $40,000 each. An employee of McCormick who later became a whistleblower said that after becoming concerned and questioning McCormick about the device, McCormick told him the ADE 651 "does exactly what it's designed to. It makes money."

20 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Security theater by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've all said it before and we've been right all along.

    1. Re:Security theater by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Informative

      War Is a Racket https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... by retired United States Marine Corps Major General and two time Medal of Honor recipient Smedley D. Butler :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Security theater by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Letting all of your potential allies be destroyed before you lift a finger is a bad strategy if you actually want to have allies for the fight. If the US wouldn't have gone to war while Britain was still in it things would have been very dark indeed. In that case it would be unlikely that the US would liberate Europe itself from the continental US. Europe's future would be slavery under the Soviet Union, Germany, or Italy. That wouldn't bode well for the US.

      As directed by Moscow, Communists in the US and Europe opposed war to to aid that other "fine bunch of socialists" running Germany. That changed once the Soviet Union was invaded.

      Using the power of the state to commit mass slaughter of civilians whether by violence or starvation is a very different thing than open warfare against a peer state.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  2. At least it only cost tens of millions of dollars by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least they only got ripped off a few tens of millions of dollars with those fake scanners -- the USA got ripped off of $160M for body scanners that don't work

  3. Time for a game of russian roulette ^ 2 by easyTree · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whereby McCormick gets to detect which one out of six bombs is not a bomb and is then forced to detonate it.

    As an aside, really!?, a ten year sentence? Either this whole story is total bullshit or someone has no concept of proportionality - doesn't taking the name of a media-multinational in vain result a longer sentence than this?

    1. Re:Time for a game of russian roulette ^ 2 by fredgiblet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well it's not like he was doing something truly heinous like dealing weed...

    2. Re:Time for a game of russian roulette ^ 2 by Shimbo · · Score: 2

      As an aside, really!?, a ten year sentence?

      10 years is the maximum sentence for fraud in the UK.

  4. 10 years is not enough by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A fraud which has contributed to the deaths of tens of thousands of people should be punished with way more than 10 years.

    1. Re:10 years is not enough by Unordained · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about the people who procured these units and didn't test them, either before the sale, or before deploying them? Complete lack of due diligence. Are they not liable too?

  5. Crime doesn't pay? LOLOLOLOL by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    It's clear as can be that I'm in the wrong business.

    Here I've been working and making an honest living all these years when I could have cobbled some 100% bullshit gadget together and sold enough of them to retire to my own tropical island and live in luxury for the rest of my life.

    Who says "crime doesn't pay"? Seems like it pays pretty damn well to me....

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  6. Re:Psuedoscience is for cows. by Radish03 · · Score: 2

    GP is clearly referring to the science of pseudo-suede, known colloquially by the portmanteau psuede.

  7. Re:10 years??? by maugle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He should be tried and convicted for several hundred counts of manslaughter, at the very least, but I bet you could convincingly argue for a couple counts of "aiding a terrorist organization" as well, and then jump from there to "treason by aiding the enemy during a time of war".

  8. Meanwhile by Dereck1701 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Meanwhile, in the United States our own "glorified dowsing rods" the TSA continues to rake in somewhere around $8 Billion dollars a year in direct costs alone (likely tens of billions when you factor in economic losses, increased road deaths and secondary costs) and is 95% ineffective at finding lighters and knives. And chances are no one responsible for that debacle is ever going to see a fine let alone a prison sentence.

    1. Re:Meanwhile by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, in the United States our own "glorified dowsing rods" the TSA continues to rake in somewhere around $8 Billion dollars a year in direct costs alone (likely tens of billions when you factor in economic losses, increased road deaths and secondary costs) and is 95% ineffective at finding lighters and knives. And chances are no one responsible for that debacle is ever going to see a fine let alone a prison sentence.

      The difference here being that the actual risk in the US is negligible whereas the risk where these bomb dowsers are being used is substantial.

      If you lived somewhere that there were real chances of a bomb being used you would want something that worked as well as possible, even if it was imperfect.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  9. Re:Fake God Detector, Blamed For Hundreds of Death by lucm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You probably blame religion for stuff like the Paris bombings or the Inquisition, but really it's bullshit. It's all about people, not religion.

    Look at the brave old USSR, which was officially godless and atheist, and see how many millions died in prison camps or politically-driven mass murders. Same with Cambodia.

    I know it's comforting to have something to blame for all the problems in the world, but that's basically the same as joining a religion because its dogma is a comforting way to see the world. Truth is, people have killed, stolen and raped each others forever, it has nothing to do with religion or politics, it's just how people are.

    So we've heard it all about religion. Religions are stupid, religious books are fables, god is a security blanket blablabla. Can we please move beyond this? It feels as dated as SCO bashing.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  10. Re:10 years??? by wbr1 · · Score: 2

    And when you kill a man, you're a murderer Kill many, and you're a conqueror Kill them all ... Ooh ... Oh you're a God!

    -Dave Mustaine, Megadeth

    http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics...

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  11. Its a matter of luck, bad and good. by drnb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of a bad ass do you have to be to get the MOH twice?!? Did he single handedly kill Hitler?

    Its a matter of luck, bad and good. Bad luck to be in a situation where the award of a Medal of Honor is appropriate. This happens far more often than such awards suggest. Good luck in the sense that two people witnessed your actions, and that they survived. Many MOH recipients accept the award in memory of those whose actions were as brave or braver than theirs but were never reported or properly witnessed.

    There are far more heroes that are unknown rather than known.

  12. Re:aren't these aimed to prevent not detect? by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    France and other countries will learn

    France has far more experience of terrorism than the USA. You may have heard of a country called Algeria. You may have heard of another called Lebanon. You may have heard of a few things that happened in Europe in the 1960s and 1970s. You haven't? Why are you giving advice then?

  13. Injustice by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

    You can be imprisoned for life for swindling people out of money, but contributing to the murder of thousands of people through fraud is only 10 years? The guy should have been given 3 boxes and an ADE 651. If he detects the bomb, he gets to live.

  14. Re:10 years??? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Ooh ...

    Megadeth

    I probably imagined that a bit camper than it actually is.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.