Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Unveils New $5 Mini-computer

An anonymous reader writes: The Raspberry Pi Foundation unveiled the Pi Zero, a new $5 mini-computer, Thursday morning. The board is the smallest Raspberry Pi yet, containing the first-gen Raspberry Pi's BCM2835 chip (safely overclocked to 1GHz) and 512MB RAM. The latest issue of The Magpi will include a free Raspberry Pi Zero and hits U.K. newsstands Thursday. The announcement came just a few days before the highly anticipated C.H.I.P. $9 mini-computer goes on sale to the public. puddingebola writes: How can they achieve this price, you may ask? "Its 40-pin GPIO header has identical pinouts, although the pads on the circuit board are "unpopulated," meaning you'll have to solder on your own connector. The same goes for the composite video output: The connection is available, but if you need a socket, you must solder it yourself." Dude, go to Radio Shack. Some relevant specs besides those mentioned above, from the blog post linked:
  • Micro-SD card slot
  • mini-HDMI socket for 1080p60 video output
  • Micro-USB sockets for data and power
  • Identical pinout to Model A+/B+/2B
  • An unpopulated composite video header
  • "Our smallest ever form factor, at 65mm x 30mm x 5mm"

New submitter graffitiwriter adds a note that the newest Pi has "already been turned into a retro gaming console. It turns out the Pi Zero is more than capable of running Retro Pie and other emulators, and even has a video output that lets you play games on an old CRT TV."

39 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. radioshack? by umafuckit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dude, go to Radio Shack.

    Or not. Mostly you can only buy consumer electronics there now.

    1. Re:radioshack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, go to Radio Shack.

      Or not. Mostly you can only buy consumer electronics there now.

      Yeah. I was thinking "what, does it need crappy batteries or something?"

    2. Re:radioshack? by rockout · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot needs a -1 "Whoosh" mod option.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  2. Mini computer by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aren't they the size of a filing cabinet?

    1. Re:Mini computer by MyAlternateID · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Take your crying about your submission being ignored to Fark.

      Take your whining about my criticism to your mom. Maybe she will dry your tears. Been a Slashdot editor long?

      The AC had correct spelling and punctuation. He or she also clearly and unambiguously expressed the intended thought. So, I strongly doubt it was a Slashdot "editor".

    2. Re:Mini computer by timothy · · Score: 2

      Well, there were upward of a dozen submissions about the new rPI; apologies if yours was better. It's not an exact science.

      We've had more than one earlier story about the CHIP -- here are two (and there might be a few more, too).

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...
        http://build.slashdot.org/stor...

      Happy Thanksgiving!

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  3. So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by luvirini · · Score: 5, Funny

    That costs $3.14?

    1. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      5 USD is 3.31 GBP, so it's almost there

    2. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Pi actually stands for Python, the main programming language used for the Raspberry Pi, effectively making it a mathematically sweet triple pun: Pi, Pie, Py-thon. Sheer genius in naming. The first name is inspired by the old tradition of naming personal computer makers after fruit: Apple, Acorn.

    3. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except Python isn't the "main" programming language used for the RPi.

      Pi is because originally we were going to produce a computer that could only really run Python. So the Pi in there is for Python. Now you can run Python on the Raspberry Pi but the design we ended up going with is much more capable than the original we thought of, so it's kind of outlived its name a little bit.

      http://www.techspot.com/article/531-eben-upton-interview/

    4. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

      Since when has an acorn been a fruit?
      So basically the "old tradition" starts and ends with "Apple".

      Acorns are seeds, which are produced within what are botanically regarded as fruit (even if, like the tomato, it's not exactly something you'd think of as "fruit" when you're looking for something to eat).

      As for Apple, there were lots of Apple II clones back in the day that adopted fruit-related names.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  4. Re:More use if it had some network connection by MyAlternateID · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hard to see how it can be useful for IoT

    Let's give the folks at Raspberry some credit. It appears they are much smarter than the morons jumping on the IoT security nightmare bandwagon.

  5. Wow ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, I remember when a fairly sizable tower was considered a "mini computer" ... hell, I think it was a friggin' VAX.

    And the desktop PC was considered a "micro-computer".

    Now we have this mini-micro computer called a mini-computer.

    This is all very complicated. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      mini-micro computer

      Nano computer!

  6. Allow me to predict the comments by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Why isn't it more powerful, I can get a Beaglebone/Banana Pi/Intel board for just a little more money with a faster processor"
    "Why isn't it less powerful, the Arduino is more efficient"
    "Why can't I have exactly what I imagine in my head for an impossibly small amount of money"
    "It doesn't have ethernet/wifi/component video/USB hub so is therefore useless"
    "The video code isn't free therefore IT IS PURE EVIL"

    A computer as a magazine cover freebie is pretty cool...

    1. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by fendragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let me add a legit complain. They only have one USB port, and ethernet/harddisk will have to share it.

      The fact's there's no built-in Ethernet interface is a legitimate complaint, but the performance issue is the same on the original Rasperry Pi, whose onboard Ethernet interface is actually a USB device sharing a USB hub with the external USB connectors.

    2. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I don't consider the ethernet on the Pi to be suitable for any mission-critical feature. That's why I'm actually excited about this version of the Pi. In the past I have criticized the poor USB support (which is also the poor ethernet support) and the lack of RAM. But if you're not expecting ethernet then the bad ethernet isn't a problem, and the lack of RAM isn't really a problem in the ultra-miniature space where this product exists. I expect it to become the new de facto standard for flight controllers beyond the most basic, for example; at this price, you can couple it with 9DOF+baro and still have it be about the same price as a Multiwii Lite, let alone an Ardupilot Mega. Since I2C is built in, it will be trivial to interface the sensors, and the Pi is already commonly used to control servos. A knockoff Arduino Nano (atmega328p) is $3.50!

      At this size and price, Pi is going to take a serious bite out of the Arduino community.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by mindwhip · · Score: 2

      Free CD? In my day it was free cassettes with a demo that will take longer to load than to play...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    4. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by fendragon · · Score: 2

      It would be better - a lot better - if there was actual, reliable ethernet hardware on there, and I'd be more than happy to pay a few bucks for it.

      Odroid C1+ does it a lot better for a few more bucks. OK, quite a lot more bucks, but it's much better all round. Actually the new RPi could cram WiFi on the board in less space than an Ethernet connector, which would be good enough for most of its networking needs but I suspect add too much to the cost.

      The ethernet on the other PI's is not particularly reliable, and that, in my case, is the downfall of the whole enterprise. I have four pis. They all drop their ethernet connections from time to time. It's beyond annoying.

      I must be very lucky as I have one which is on 24/7 as a home mail/backup/DNS server. Though it's slow for USB sharing reasons described above, it's run for over 2 years without problems. (touch wood...)

  7. It came true.... by newsdee · · Score: 2

    Back in the 90s I joked that computers would become so ubiquitous that they would some away when buying a box of laundry powder.... not far away now...

    1. Re:It came true.... by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 2

      We're already there...

      http://www.amazon.com/Tide-Pod...

  8. Not meant to be a good device but to undercut CHIP by Vapula · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As is, this Raspberry is quite useless... You need to add
    - a SD card
    - some header
    - an USB Hub
    - Some adapters (micro-USB to USB host, HDMI)
    - Some network dongle (Wifi or RJ45)
    - You can use the video composite output... but you don't have any sound output so video composite is rather useless and you need to use more expensive HDMI monitors

    When you add all these hidden costs, you get a price similar to Raspberry 1 or 2... in a much less practical form.

    They stripped the card of everything possible to reach that 5$ price tag... which make me think that they wanted to undercut the C.H.I.P. which is going out in a couple of month and will be 9$...

    Useless product... Microcontrollers (AVR/PIC/...) or conventionnal Raspberry/BBB/... are much more useful.

  9. Re:Conversion Error by Vapula · · Score: 4, Informative

    Arduino has some advantages :

    - cheaper (nano/pro clones are at less than 3$)
    - lower power consumption
    - both digital AND ANALOG pins
    - exists in both 3v3 AND 5V (which is hobbyist friendlier)
    - easier to begin computing (good libraries support, no need for that awful langage (IMHO) that is Python, we even have ardublock or mblock to make native visual (scratch-like) programming)

    For connected projects, ESP8266 may be the way to go... lots of flash space, decent number of I/O and still cost lower than RaspZero.

  10. Re:More use if it had some network connection by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Underrated. No Ethernet, no buy.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  11. The submitter is obnoxious by rebelwarlock · · Score: 2

    If you're considering putting "dude" in your submission, turn off your internet and go live in a hole instead. Though you may already have done that if you think you can go to Radio Shack to get anything you can solder on, to, or with.

  12. Needs Ethernet by Luthair · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its cool but, the lack of ethernet for most uses means people will also need to buy a USB network adapter bringing the price back up to $20 or so.

  13. Not actually available now by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is element14 still in business?

    SBC, RASPBERRY PI ZERO
    [generic broken product image]
    Image is for illustrative purposes only. Please refer to product description Manufacturer: RASPBERRY-PI
    Mfg Part No: RASPBERRYPI-ZERO

    Price: $23.17 (Price is before tax)
    Out of Stock
    Price: $13.50 (Price is before tax)
    0 ship now

    So in short, the product is not immediately available (it's sold out in the Swag shop also) and when it is, it won't be $5 unless you order it direct. And then, if you don't live in the UK, you'll have to pay an assload of shipping.

    Where can I buy R-Pi in a B&M store in the USA, so that I can actually get it for $5? And when will it actually be available?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Not actually available now by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      are you gonna cry and throw a tantrum if you can't have it RIGHT NOW or are you going to understand the reality of the supply pipeline

      Actually, I'm going to complain about how Eben, Liz, and the Pi Foundation in general set unrealistic expectations. For example, Liz demonstrating Android ICS on the Pi and then never releasing the code, nor an explanation for why not (probably Broadcom contractual bullshit) or now Eben claiming that the Pi Zero is immediately available when it is not immediately available. Why do they have to tell lies? Why can't "coming soon" be good enough?

      Now, why can't you demonstrate even the minuscule amount of courage needed to log in before talking shit? Concerned you'll lose your editor job?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Not actually available now by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      it was immediately available, you just were too late (and so was this article :p)

      Even assuming that was true, it wasn't immediately available for $5 anywhere in the world, unless you got it "free" with a magazine nobody should want because better information is always available online. Why not just wait to announce immediate availability until more than a handful of people can get it immediately? It wouldn't cost anything to just tell it like it is instead of inflating the story to look good.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Not actually available now by Racemaniac · · Score: 2

      yes it was, at least at pihut you could opt for not going with the package, and just get the pi zero for the stated price.
      and they probably had a few thousand pieces available, with only 1 per customer allowed, so i don't know what you call a handful of people...

  14. New meaning of mini-computer by johnw · · Score: 3, Informative

    To me, "mini-computer" still means something that only requires two or three 6' cabinets - as opposed to a mainframe, which needs a whole room full.

  15. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    As is, this Raspberry is quite useless... You need to add
    - a SD card

    $2

    some header

    No. No I don't. I can solder direct. For my application, that's actually more useful to me.

    an USB Hub

    If I even use the USB functionality at all, I shall use it to connect perhaps one device. Therefore, I only need some micro USB connectors. I got five minis for two bucks, I'm sure micro connectors are plenty cheap. Or I can pop the USB connectors right off the boards, and just solder magnet wire to the pads. I only wish they had brought in power on an unpopulated header connector instead of on a usb connector which I'm going to have to desolder.

    Some adapters (micro-USB to USB host, HDMI)

    I don't need the HDMI. If I use the GPU at all, it'll be for computing and not for video output. Already discussed the USB adapter issue, which for me is a non-issue.

    Useless product... Microcontrollers (AVR/PIC/...) or conventionnal Raspberry/BBB/... are much more useful.

    You can use this to do precisely what you do with a microcontroller; this is going to replace Arduino for a lot of uses.

    The real problem is going to be actually getting them for $5. element14 is sold out and wants $13.50 for one even if they had one!

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not useless as is. If you have one specific task for the Pi then you wont need a lot of that stuff. Why pay for ethernet if you wont be using it? Sure this isn't for everyone but I can see things it would be usefull for and I know at 5 bucks a pop it'll wind up doing a lot of things.

  17. CHIP seems like the better deal by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CHIP has WiFi, Bluetooth, and 4Gbytes of NAND built in, all things you need to add to the Raspberry Pi.

  18. Re:Conversion Error by barc0001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It REALLY depends what your application for it is. For controlling things or reading a sensor? Arduino all the way. Media center or retro gaming emulation console? Not a chance, Pi all the way.

  19. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

    I only wish they had brought in power on an unpopulated header connector instead of on a usb connector which I'm going to have to desolder.

    Two of the pins (+5V and any GND) on the 40-pin connector can be used to supply power instead of going through the USB port. That's what I did with my beer-fridge controller: power for the whole system comes through the barrel connector on the 1-Wire/I2C interface board in the middle of the stack.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  20. Re:More use if it had some network connection by rwa2 · · Score: 2

    Meh, USB ethernet is faster than the built-in 100TX port on the Pi B+ / Pi 2. So buy a USB ethernet adapter.

    I'm actually a bit surprised no one has started selling USB network switches without CAT5 or RJ-45 connectors (well, maybe one for the uplink).

  21. Re:Conversion Error by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The SoC in a Pi is a media device (originally designed for use in camcorders) so this is not underpowered -- it's perfectly adequately powered.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  22. Re:More use if it had some network connection by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

    Different applications. Of course the pcduino is more capable - it's more than ten times the price. There's a wide spectrum of tiny computing devices available. There are the absolutely tiny PICs, the slightly more powerful and much more developer-friendly arduinos, then the Pis, then higher-power devices like the pcduino, and beyond that mini-ITX PC boards with Atom processors. With a variety of interfaces and capabilities. You just pick whichever one fits your application. If you need a 'proper OS' to run something like image processing or interface to USB peripherals, then Pi Zero is about the tiniest and lowest-power controller you'll find for the task. It's certainly the cheapest.