Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Unveils New $5 Mini-computer

An anonymous reader writes: The Raspberry Pi Foundation unveiled the Pi Zero, a new $5 mini-computer, Thursday morning. The board is the smallest Raspberry Pi yet, containing the first-gen Raspberry Pi's BCM2835 chip (safely overclocked to 1GHz) and 512MB RAM. The latest issue of The Magpi will include a free Raspberry Pi Zero and hits U.K. newsstands Thursday. The announcement came just a few days before the highly anticipated C.H.I.P. $9 mini-computer goes on sale to the public. puddingebola writes: How can they achieve this price, you may ask? "Its 40-pin GPIO header has identical pinouts, although the pads on the circuit board are "unpopulated," meaning you'll have to solder on your own connector. The same goes for the composite video output: The connection is available, but if you need a socket, you must solder it yourself." Dude, go to Radio Shack. Some relevant specs besides those mentioned above, from the blog post linked:
  • Micro-SD card slot
  • mini-HDMI socket for 1080p60 video output
  • Micro-USB sockets for data and power
  • Identical pinout to Model A+/B+/2B
  • An unpopulated composite video header
  • "Our smallest ever form factor, at 65mm x 30mm x 5mm"

New submitter graffitiwriter adds a note that the newest Pi has "already been turned into a retro gaming console. It turns out the Pi Zero is more than capable of running Retro Pie and other emulators, and even has a video output that lets you play games on an old CRT TV."

149 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. radioshack? by umafuckit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dude, go to Radio Shack.

    Or not. Mostly you can only buy consumer electronics there now.

    1. Re:radioshack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, go to Radio Shack.

      Or not. Mostly you can only buy consumer electronics there now.

      Yeah. I was thinking "what, does it need crappy batteries or something?"

    2. Re:radioshack? by rockout · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot needs a -1 "Whoosh" mod option.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    3. Re:radioshack? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Dude, go to Radio Shack.

      Yeah, my initial reaction was "why? I Don't need a cell phone."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    4. Re:radioshack? by fizzer06 · · Score: 1

      They're still open in my area and still sell hobbyist electronics and Arduinos. No Raspberry love however.

    5. Re:radioshack? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Quite right. Try out Micro Center, if there is one in your area. Or Frys.

      Speaking of Pi Zero, I do hope Minix gets ported to it.

    6. Re:radioshack? by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Sprint bought them and are keeping some (many?) of the stores around here open. There's also Fry's and a few other places that still stock some of the geeky stuff in a back corner somewhere :/

    7. Re:radioshack? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this is a completely incorrect use of the term "minicomputer". The '80s are here, and are willing and able to slap you back to the '60s.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    8. Re: radioshack? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      B&H if you can find a day that isn't an obscure holiday.

    9. Re:radioshack? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Gateway Electronics is still around. http://www.gatewaycatalog.com/

      A bit of a trip for most people. (Sorry.)

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    10. Re:radioshack? by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      Nano? Pico?

  2. Mini computer by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aren't they the size of a filing cabinet?

    1. Re:Mini computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Take your crying about your submission being ignored to Fark.

    2. Re:Mini computer by MyAlternateID · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Take your crying about your submission being ignored to Fark.

      Take your whining about my criticism to your mom. Maybe she will dry your tears. Been a Slashdot editor long?

      The AC had correct spelling and punctuation. He or she also clearly and unambiguously expressed the intended thought. So, I strongly doubt it was a Slashdot "editor".

    3. Re:Mini computer by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      This is far more funny than insightful.

    4. Re:Mini computer by timothy · · Score: 2

      Well, there were upward of a dozen submissions about the new rPI; apologies if yours was better. It's not an exact science.

      We've had more than one earlier story about the CHIP -- here are two (and there might be a few more, too).

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...
        http://build.slashdot.org/stor...

      Happy Thanksgiving!

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  3. More use if it had some network connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rather than having to use an adapter to connect a usb dongle...

    Hard to see how it can be useful for IoT - if it can't (easily) connect to the internet...

    Heres hoping they come out with a Wifi version.

    1. Re:More use if it had some network connection by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Prefer a USB wifi dongle that I can have on a long cable and the antenna to poke outside the housing that the RPi is in..

    2. Re:More use if it had some network connection by MyAlternateID · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hard to see how it can be useful for IoT

      Let's give the folks at Raspberry some credit. It appears they are much smarter than the morons jumping on the IoT security nightmare bandwagon.

    3. Re:More use if it had some network connection by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      Underrated. No Ethernet, no buy.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:More use if it had some network connection by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      that's my biggest gripe about most these mini computers, you give me a ethernet port with magnetics but wifi is not an option (pcduino does it the other way around)

    5. Re:More use if it had some network connection by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It does have USB. Also, this mini-model doesn't have ethernet. There's no reason you can't use a USB-ethernet adaptor. That's how the Pi B works. The second chip on the circuit board is a combined ethernet interface a USB hub. It's a nice chip, aside from being a real power hog and the reason the B draws almost twice the power of the A.

    6. Re:More use if it had some network connection by perpenso · · Score: 1

      $10 USB wifi adapters are extremely common among Pi users. Wifi is a reasonable thing to leave off in order to keep the design simple.

    7. Re:More use if it had some network connection by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      I give the folks as Raspberry credit for giving the computer away for nearly free, but then making a fortune off of the "accessories" necessary to make it work ;-)

      But I'm still dreaming of building a beowulf cluster of these so they can run a micro-cloud of docker containers with services offloaded from my little ION server.

    8. Re:More use if it had some network connection by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      Meh, USB ethernet is faster than the built-in 100TX port on the Pi B+ / Pi 2. So buy a USB ethernet adapter.

      I'm actually a bit surprised no one has started selling USB network switches without CAT5 or RJ-45 connectors (well, maybe one for the uplink).

    9. Re:More use if it had some network connection by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Meh, USB ethernet is faster than the built-in 100TX port on the Pi B+ / Pi 2. So buy a USB ethernet adapter.

      I'm actually a bit surprised no one has started selling USB network switches without CAT5 or RJ-45 connectors (well, maybe one for the uplink).

      Oh, I meant to include a link with that... http://www.midwesternmac.com/b...

    10. Re:More use if it had some network connection by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      there's also no reason for me to not catch a pcduino on sale for 26$ that has wifi onboard, and its still faster

      I dunno why there is such a fanbase of the pi as there are better SBC's out there

    11. Re:More use if it had some network connection by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Different applications. Of course the pcduino is more capable - it's more than ten times the price. There's a wide spectrum of tiny computing devices available. There are the absolutely tiny PICs, the slightly more powerful and much more developer-friendly arduinos, then the Pis, then higher-power devices like the pcduino, and beyond that mini-ITX PC boards with Atom processors. With a variety of interfaces and capabilities. You just pick whichever one fits your application. If you need a 'proper OS' to run something like image processing or interface to USB peripherals, then Pi Zero is about the tiniest and lowest-power controller you'll find for the task. It's certainly the cheapest.

    12. Re:More use if it had some network connection by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The built in ethernet on the other Pi's is a usb ethernet adapter.

    13. Re:More use if it had some network connection by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Yep, but it's a 100TX USB adapter. The guy in the link that I forgot to include plugged in a GbE USB adapter and manage to push 220Mbps
      http://www.midwesternmac.com/b...

      Not bad, compared to, say, the odroid C1 which has a built-in GbE port but people have reported only being able to push ~270Mbps through it.

      So cutting the crappy 100TX USB adapter integrated in the Raspberry Pi A to get it to the $5 price point is probably for the best, since now you just throw on exactly whatever USB NIC you really need, whether it's a GbE dongle, or a wifi dongle, or an LTE dongle, a straight host-to-host usbnet cable, or whatever.

      I'm just surprised there aren't more usbnet switches out there, even if they're just a bunch of "normal" switches with a usbnet dongle built in to each port.

    14. Re:More use if it had some network connection by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It was a chip that combined both a usb hub and ethernet adapter. Hence the single port on this cheap one - the SoC only has one.

    15. Re:More use if it had some network connection by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      um 10 times the price, I bought a lite on sale for 26$, read 1 post above

      so 35-26 = 10x the price

      or in this case
      5 + 15 for wifi + 5 more for postage cause the cheapest one your going to buy in a retail store is 30-40 bucks = 25 - 26 = 10x more

      no,you fucking moron

    16. Re:More use if it had some network connection by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I just looked up the standard retail, before any discount or sales offer.

    17. Re:More use if it had some network connection by tresho · · Score: 1

      Yesterday evening I bought a RPI Zero in person, at my nearest MicroCenter for $5.40, tax included. They had sold out many hours before that. I only got it because I placed an online order the day before as soon as I read about the Zero. Up until a few weeks ago, MC was selling USB 2.0 WiFi adapters for $5.99 before sales tax. Cheapest USB WiFi adapter they sell at the moment costs $9.99. My only grip in the HDMI type C (or mini) video socket, which is trivially smaller than an HDMI type A socket. An HDMI type C adapter or cable will cost far more than the Zero.

  4. So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by luvirini · · Score: 5, Funny

    That costs $3.14?

    1. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      5 USD is 3.31 GBP, so it's almost there

    2. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well I'll sell you one for $3141.59 8-)

    3. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Pi actually stands for Python, the main programming language used for the Raspberry Pi, effectively making it a mathematically sweet triple pun: Pi, Pie, Py-thon. Sheer genius in naming. The first name is inspired by the old tradition of naming personal computer makers after fruit: Apple, Acorn.

    4. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except Python isn't the "main" programming language used for the RPi.

      Pi is because originally we were going to produce a computer that could only really run Python. So the Pi in there is for Python. Now you can run Python on the Raspberry Pi but the design we ended up going with is much more capable than the original we thought of, so it's kind of outlived its name a little bit.

      http://www.techspot.com/article/531-eben-upton-interview/

    5. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Then they should have either called it Raspberry Py or Raspberry Pie.

    6. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      Since when has an acorn been a fruit?
      So basically the "old tradition" starts and ends with "Apple".

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    7. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

      Since when has an acorn been a fruit?
      So basically the "old tradition" starts and ends with "Apple".

      Acorns are seeds, which are produced within what are botanically regarded as fruit (even if, like the tomato, it's not exactly something you'd think of as "fruit" when you're looking for something to eat).

      As for Apple, there were lots of Apple II clones back in the day that adopted fruit-related names.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Blackberry.

    9. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      How about I just charge you $355 for 113 of them?

      355 / 113 = 3.141592920353982

      (I have never understood why anybody uses 22/7 instead of a slightly bigger approximation that is extremely close to Pi)

    10. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      They are bringing out an one bit computer next year, called the Raspberry Pi Slice. You can add as many of them together as you need, one kilobit CPU? Not a problem, so long as you can work out how to compile GNU Hurd for it.

    11. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by tresho · · Score: 1

      the bare board costs $5 while options with SD card, adapters and all kinds of extras reach the prices like the one you listed. I fool around with computer electronics, and so have most of the required "extras" for the RPI Zero laying around here,somewhere. The only thing I didn't already have that the RPI Zero needs was a HDMI type C (mini) video cable.

    12. Re:So how long until we have Rasperry Pi Pi by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Those are American, we are talking about proper British products of course.

  5. Wow ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, I remember when a fairly sizable tower was considered a "mini computer" ... hell, I think it was a friggin' VAX.

    And the desktop PC was considered a "micro-computer".

    Now we have this mini-micro computer called a mini-computer.

    This is all very complicated. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      mini-micro computer

      Nano computer!

    2. Re:Wow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly: Minicomputer already has an established meaning for a certain category of device. Attempts to redefine it merely cause confusion.

    3. Re:Wow ... by tomhath · · Score: 1

      DEC and Data General made "minicomputers", the latest raspberry Pi is a "mini-computer".

    4. Re:Wow ... by angelbar · · Score: 1

      Full circle my friend... so, now we are the old guys

      --
      -no sig today-
    5. Re:Wow ... by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 1

      So, I remember when a fairly sizable tower was considered a "mini computer" ... hell, I think it was a friggin' VAX.

      And the desktop PC was considered a "micro-computer".

      Now we have this mini-micro computer called a mini-computer.

      This is all very complicated. :-P

      The Chinese OEMs produce what they called a mini-PC, basically the ARM version or original of the Intel Compute Stick. So that's your mini-microcomputer.

    6. Re:Wow ... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      So, I remember when a fairly sizable tower was considered a "mini computer" ... hell, I think it was a friggin' VAX.

      A VAX-11/780 at 5 MHz and up to 8 MB? This ARM SoC is more than competitive at 700 MHz, 512 MB.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:Wow ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      To be fair a Pi may equal old school minicomputers in terms of performance, so in that context the name isn't so bad. :-)

    8. Re:Wow ... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      A wristwatch equals old school minicomputers in terms of performance -- this Pi is a mainframe!

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    9. Re:Wow ... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Maybe in raw CPU transactions, but it's not really a valid comparison. A Pi can't support sub-second response times for multiple users - I have one, I tried to see how many remote terminal sessions it could cope with. Realistically, it was one..... single, uno, ein.

      Minicomputers weren't bought for their blazing top speed, they were bought to cope with the types of workload that came with having multiple remote sessions, big databases, and overnight batch runs, e.g. payroll.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    10. Re:Wow ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      My school day recollections are of PDP-11 having quite the problem with response time with multiple users as well. It was best not to expect to use the PDP as assignment deadlines neared. Anyone's, not just yours.

  6. Conversion Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Pi Zero magazine offer costs 5.99 British Pounds, NOT $5. The cost in U.S. dollars is ~$13.

    Naturally, you'll still need to add several more dollars for case, power supply, microSD card...

    None the less, this is a very good price and a fantastic form factor. Based on the headline, I had hoped that this would supplant the Arduino. But, not yet.

    1. Re:Conversion Error by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Even at $5, it wouldn't supplant the Arduino for projects where using a micro-controller is simpler. If you need the horsepower, then it would be fantastic. But shooting firmware to a micro-controller will always be simpler than setting up a Linux application on a Raspberry Pi.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Conversion Error by Vapula · · Score: 4, Informative

      Arduino has some advantages :

      - cheaper (nano/pro clones are at less than 3$)
      - lower power consumption
      - both digital AND ANALOG pins
      - exists in both 3v3 AND 5V (which is hobbyist friendlier)
      - easier to begin computing (good libraries support, no need for that awful langage (IMHO) that is Python, we even have ardublock or mblock to make native visual (scratch-like) programming)

      For connected projects, ESP8266 may be the way to go... lots of flash space, decent number of I/O and still cost lower than RaspZero.

    3. Re:Conversion Error by unixisc · · Score: 1

      By the time everything is in, the price will be back to the $35 that the regular Raspberry Pi costs

    4. Re:Conversion Error by barc0001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It REALLY depends what your application for it is. For controlling things or reading a sensor? Arduino all the way. Media center or retro gaming emulation console? Not a chance, Pi all the way.

    5. Re:Conversion Error by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      You can go smaller still. The PIC chips are even smaller than an arduino. They are even smaller than a bare atmega, because an atmega needs a regulated power supply, and a PIC has a much wider input voltage tolerance.

    6. Re:Conversion Error by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And if you want fast interrupts, reliability and real-time performance, using an Arduino and custom code is far better, as it is massively simpler ans still possible to understand in its details.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:Conversion Error by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but now you can bolt a Pi onto an Arduino for almost nothing and get the best of both worlds.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:Conversion Error by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Why not use them together? Seems like an easy/cheap way to add wifi to RaspZero.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Conversion Error by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

      It also matters at scale. If trying to build a few hundred widgets for a university campus, you need a real OS to handle manageability, as well as command and control. If it's just a dumb sensor, expect a one-way communication that may or may not exist when it falls off a wall.

    10. Re:Conversion Error by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The SoC in a Pi is a media device (originally designed for use in camcorders) so this is not underpowered -- it's perfectly adequately powered.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    11. Re:Conversion Error by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      As Half-pint HAL says, it's not underpowered. It's got 40% more raw juice than the first gen Pi, which I used as an XBMC media center running 1080p content just fine. In fact better than most of the commerical media players (like WDTV, etc) at the time could do.

    12. Re:Conversion Error by tresho · · Score: 1

      The Pi Zero magazine offer costs 5.99 British Pounds, NOT $5. The cost in U.S. dollars is ~$13. I paid $5.40 US (Ohio sales tax included) for a RPI Zero I bought in person in Cleveland (actually Mayfield Heights MicroCenter) the evening of Nov. 27.

    13. Re:Conversion Error by Vapula · · Score: 1

      And do you REALLY need a whole full fledged OS for a device that will be limited to ONE task and will do most of it's I/O through direct GPIO control ?

      OS is about
      - memory management
      - task management
      - device (peripherals) management

      So, except if you plan to use this to generate a video signal, this is clearly a big overhead...

      Some will say "I plan to use it as a media center"... except that for a media center, it's better to have some USB input (usbdisks) and network... back to regular Raspberries...

      Remain the retro-gaming emulation... using HDMI as Composite don't have the Audio pins... hence more expensive screens (as the low-cost one are Composite only...). The extra cost for a full-fledged Raspberry becoming small...

      Don't misinterpret what I say : I find that the Raspberry Pi 1/2 are great devices (and own several of these)... I'm just saying that this specific one is not a good one... looks like it was rushed out without enough planning...

      - costs minimized... most connectors removed... but kept the micro-USB connector for the power in instead of having 2 pins (or solder pads) which would have led to same footprint but lower cost and allowing more options
      - Composite VGA signal present... but not the sound signals (which would only have been two more solderpads)
      - Several GPIO went unused when removing the network support... but they were not made available (as an header extension)

      This was created for use-cases that are often better solved with other (cheaper) devices...

    14. Re:Conversion Error by Vapula · · Score: 1

      Programming is not about luck...

      And a $3 arduino is as easy to program than a $25 one... that is much easier than for example PIC or AVR with "raw" C compiler.

      Want to interface a small 2x16 LCD ? some servos ? some stepper ? some temperature captor ? there are libraries that make it a piece of cake... Much easier than programming PIC/AVR in ASM or C (without arduino libraries)... 8-9 years old kids can do it !!!

      And if you use mBlock, even a 6 years old kid can program an Arduino (I use mBlock which is Scratch based to teach programming to my 6yrs old son)

      so, yes, Arduino is much easier to program.

  7. Allow me to predict the comments by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Why isn't it more powerful, I can get a Beaglebone/Banana Pi/Intel board for just a little more money with a faster processor"
    "Why isn't it less powerful, the Arduino is more efficient"
    "Why can't I have exactly what I imagine in my head for an impossibly small amount of money"
    "It doesn't have ethernet/wifi/component video/USB hub so is therefore useless"
    "The video code isn't free therefore IT IS PURE EVIL"

    A computer as a magazine cover freebie is pretty cool...

    1. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think this is one of the coolest parts about the release. I used to get excited getting a free CD or DVD demo with a magazine, now a COMPUTER?!

      Stocking-stuffer of my dreams right here!

    2. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Let me add a legit complain. They only have one USB port, and ethernet/harddisk will have to share it. It means it would suck as an NAS server. For $5 it would be a cool throwaway card for various projects though, like you know a intelligent garden lighting or whatever.

    3. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by fendragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let me add a legit complain. They only have one USB port, and ethernet/harddisk will have to share it.

      The fact's there's no built-in Ethernet interface is a legitimate complaint, but the performance issue is the same on the original Rasperry Pi, whose onboard Ethernet interface is actually a USB device sharing a USB hub with the external USB connectors.

    4. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Part of it is simply a matter of dongle-count. Yes, ethernet is absolutely needed; yes, the connector should be right there, physically secure. No, USB dongles to provide ethernet won't ever be on my list of things I'm excited to do.

      It would be better - a lot better - if there was actual, reliable ethernet hardware on there, and I'd be more than happy to pay a few bucks for it.

      The ethernet on the other PI's is not particularly reliable, and that, in my case, is the downfall of the whole enterprise. I have four pis. They all drop their ethernet connections from time to time. It's beyond annoying.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I don't consider the ethernet on the Pi to be suitable for any mission-critical feature. That's why I'm actually excited about this version of the Pi. In the past I have criticized the poor USB support (which is also the poor ethernet support) and the lack of RAM. But if you're not expecting ethernet then the bad ethernet isn't a problem, and the lack of RAM isn't really a problem in the ultra-miniature space where this product exists. I expect it to become the new de facto standard for flight controllers beyond the most basic, for example; at this price, you can couple it with 9DOF+baro and still have it be about the same price as a Multiwii Lite, let alone an Ardupilot Mega. Since I2C is built in, it will be trivial to interface the sensors, and the Pi is already commonly used to control servos. A knockoff Arduino Nano (atmega328p) is $3.50!

      At this size and price, Pi is going to take a serious bite out of the Arduino community.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      No they dont, but many do require communication with each other or with a master computer/controller. Ethernet is the easiest way to do this.

      yes, you need to broaden your thinking

      And you need to listen to your own advice.

    7. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by mindwhip · · Score: 2

      Free CD? In my day it was free cassettes with a demo that will take longer to load than to play...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    8. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cassettes? In my dat it ws a 40-page uncommented source code that you had to type, compile and sort out eighty-something bugs before getting it to run.

    9. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 1

      Serial comms from the GPIO - link it up to a model B [other end points are available] via pppd and you have a fairly reasonable link speed

      --
      who where what when now?
    10. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The ethernet on other Pis *is* an ethernet dongle.

      Look at the board. The processor has an onboard USB interface, one port. On the A, that interface goes to the USB port - that's why it only has one. On the B, it goes to the extra chip that the A doesn't have. That chip is a combined USB hub and USB-ethernet interface. The ethernet and two USB ports connect up to that, and it in turn connects to the processor's one USB interface.

    11. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by fendragon · · Score: 2

      It would be better - a lot better - if there was actual, reliable ethernet hardware on there, and I'd be more than happy to pay a few bucks for it.

      Odroid C1+ does it a lot better for a few more bucks. OK, quite a lot more bucks, but it's much better all round. Actually the new RPi could cram WiFi on the board in less space than an Ethernet connector, which would be good enough for most of its networking needs but I suspect add too much to the cost.

      The ethernet on the other PI's is not particularly reliable, and that, in my case, is the downfall of the whole enterprise. I have four pis. They all drop their ethernet connections from time to time. It's beyond annoying.

      I must be very lucky as I have one which is on 24/7 as a home mail/backup/DNS server. Though it's slow for USB sharing reasons described above, it's run for over 2 years without problems. (touch wood...)

    12. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Let me add a legit complain. They only have one USB port, and ethernet/harddisk will have to share it. It means it would suck as an NAS server. For $5 it would be a cool throwaway card for various projects though, like you know a intelligent garden lighting or whatever.

      Exactly. The Pi is not a replacement for a computer (though the fact that you can manage to use it as a cheap replacement for a computer is a bonus). It's job is to get the bits there. That's all. Say you were just using the Pi to serve stuff straight from RAM, so your USBHDD / USBNIC contention wouldn't be an issue. Even at the $5 price point, and assuming you could use all 512MB of RAM to serve memcached, it would still be cheaper to just add a 2GB of RAM to your server for $15. It does not make sense to use any Pi to replace a desktop, tablet, or server. They can all do it better for cheaper (once you factor in the cost of all of the Pi's "necessary accessories").

      Think, instead, of the Pi as a way to put a USB port on anything, and report back to your server cluster. Log to rsyslog when your garage door opens or closes, when the doorbell rings, when someone flushes the toilet. Maybe add a $15 USB webcam to snag a picture or video snippet of the event. That kind of thing. But the first thing you should ask yourself is: "Would this application be better served by a $35 Amazon Fire Tablet or Chromecast dongle or a $15 Arduino clone or a "real" mini-ITX PC with exactly the RAM/GPU/SDD you need for your application which is actually more price/performance competitive with the Pi than you might think".

    13. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Didn't Broadcomm release source code for the video hardware (albeit not for the same chip as in the Pi but a different related chip?)

    14. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Any more stupid questions?

      Yes. When connecting the board on my cat's harness to a network would you recommend letting the cat drag the ethernet cable behind it or should I program a drone to hover above the cat and route the cable via that?

      Could you also advise on a drone silent enough to not distract the cat or its prey?

    15. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by sjames · · Score: 1

      At this size and price, Pi is going to take a serious bite out of the Arduino community.

      It will take some, but the AVR (not necessarily Arduino) still has a few distinct advantages for some applications. TheRPi is a 3.3V device and the GPIO pins are NOT 5V tolerant. There's a lot of nice TTL hardware out there that it won't play nice with. Meanwhile, you can get a very small pro-mini clone from China for $2 each. The other area the RPi won't touch is extreme low power. If you remove the regulator and power LED (or on the pro-mini, cut the solder link to them), you can drop to 10s of micro-amps in various sleep modes and wake on pin-change interrupts or the watchdog timer. That makes a big difference if you want to run it on a LiIon battery. If you underclock the AVR (using the clock divider register) it can easily operate reliably down to the low cutoff voltage of the battery.

      That's not meant to take anything from the Pi zero. It opens a lot of possibilities where you need more CPU power than the AVR can offer.

    16. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of those go straight in the bin...

    17. Re:Allow me to predict the comments by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      or download it from the publiisher's bbs or order a floppy by snail mail order with one of the order cards in the magazine.

  8. It came true.... by newsdee · · Score: 2

    Back in the 90s I joked that computers would become so ubiquitous that they would some away when buying a box of laundry powder.... not far away now...

    1. Re: It came true.... by newsdee · · Score: 1

      *give some away

    2. Re:It came true.... by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 2

      We're already there...

      http://www.amazon.com/Tide-Pod...

  9. 2004? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Linux has been available in laundry detergent, at Wallmart, since around 2004.

  10. Not meant to be a good device but to undercut CHIP by Vapula · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As is, this Raspberry is quite useless... You need to add
    - a SD card
    - some header
    - an USB Hub
    - Some adapters (micro-USB to USB host, HDMI)
    - Some network dongle (Wifi or RJ45)
    - You can use the video composite output... but you don't have any sound output so video composite is rather useless and you need to use more expensive HDMI monitors

    When you add all these hidden costs, you get a price similar to Raspberry 1 or 2... in a much less practical form.

    They stripped the card of everything possible to reach that 5$ price tag... which make me think that they wanted to undercut the C.H.I.P. which is going out in a couple of month and will be 9$...

    Useless product... Microcontrollers (AVR/PIC/...) or conventionnal Raspberry/BBB/... are much more useful.

  11. The submitter is obnoxious by rebelwarlock · · Score: 2

    If you're considering putting "dude" in your submission, turn off your internet and go live in a hole instead. Though you may already have done that if you think you can go to Radio Shack to get anything you can solder on, to, or with.

    1. Re:The submitter is obnoxious by Nyder · · Score: 1

      If you're considering putting "dude" in your submission, turn off your internet and go live in a hole instead. Though you may already have done that if you think you can go to Radio Shack to get anything you can solder on, to, or with.

      Whoa, back up dude. Nothing wrong with using the term of endearment "dude". It's a time honored way of addressing someone politely. For example, if I didn't use the term "dude" I might say things like "cumquat, shit for brains, twat, fucker, shithead, dumbfuck or the time honored "cunt". Instead I and others use the term "dude" because we are either in front of children or just being polite.

      Remember that next time you complain about someone calling you dude, dude.

      --
      Be seeing you...
  12. Needs Ethernet by Luthair · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its cool but, the lack of ethernet for most uses means people will also need to buy a USB network adapter bringing the price back up to $20 or so.

    1. Re:Needs Ethernet by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      i'm also can't believe the comments
      when i saw this i ordered some dirt cheap usb wifi adapters from china (that are raspberry compatible) 2$ a piece or so, i'll order some raspbery pi zero's asap (and chip too once the become available), and i've got some fun projects in mind where the ram & processing power of the arduino likes isn't enough, and wifi connectivity would be nice :).
      i've basically been counting down until i could lay my hands on micro pc's like this to do some fun embedded projects around the house :).

    2. Re:Needs Ethernet by hattig · · Score: 1

      Some people want ethernet, some people want WiFi, some people want Bluetooth, some people want 4 USB ports.

      If you want all of these, then maybe a full size Pi is the best option from the beginning.

      Otherwise we're talking about a £4 board, a £1 micro-USB to Male USB adaptor, and the comms dongle of your choice.

      You might not even need the adapter - http://www.amazon.co.uk/100Mbp...

      A headless server connected to your home router for £6.49 + SD card + PSU (you probably already have these).

    3. Re:Needs Ethernet by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      well, i have to correct myself, they were 3$, and had thousands of happy comments from buyers saying they work perfectly and are plug & play on rpi :)so i'm not all that worried. and for my first application i hope them to achieve a range of a few meters without anything in between :p

    4. Re:Needs Ethernet by tresho · · Score: 1

      it's 2015 and some people have never heard of USB wifi adapters about 4 years ago I informed my niece with her MSEE about their existence.

    5. Re:Needs Ethernet by phorm · · Score: 1

      With my Pi B, I found that the majority of USB wifi adaptors behaved rather poorly for some reason (losing connection, generating load, etc). Maybe I just had a bad board, but the same adaptors worked OK on other machines.

  13. Re:All fine and dandy, but... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    Since when are viruses useful?

  14. Re:New ITX Form Factor by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    The previous Raspberry Pi models are already smaller than pico-ITX.

    And this new Raspberry Pi Zero is roughly half the size of a Raspberry Pi model A+ which itself is a bit shorter than a Raspberry Pi 2.

  15. The Pi and Emulators by AmericaCounterweight · · Score: 1

    While the Pi can run some emulators it shouldn't be used as a key point for the devices. Most of the emulators the Pi runs are 10-15 years old. Emulation has advanced a lot in those years, especially emulation of the classics. Emulators like Higan (SNES) have high CPU requirements (i5-i7 for everything at full speed) for good reason, and the only MAME version I could find for the Pi last time I looked was based on a 0.36 series release, which to give you a timeframe is from when Windows 95 was at the peak of popularity, it didn't run many games and the ones it ran, it ran badly with worse graphics, colors, and sound compared to the versions you can run on even a mid-range PC today. Don't get me wrong, these are cool devices, and an essential part of keeping computing alive, teaching youngsters how computers actually work etc. but if you're investing time into them and expecting a truly authentic emulation experience you're wasting your time.

  16. Sadly, still no Wifi/Bluetooth by Eloking · · Score: 1

    First, I want to applaud this achievement. 5$ for a little computer with a 40-pin with 26 GPIO is quite amazing in term of capacity. They are getting real closer to get a price tag low enough so it'll enter the manufacturing of some SMBs. I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing those into some toys or drone real soon because it just cut the development time drastically.

    But I'm saddened that it still doesn't come with WiFi. The ESP8266 is a good example on how cheap and small it could be. You could scrap the huge Ethernet port and still connect to the internet. Also, I'm frustrated that the Bluetooth didn't become the standard it should be and doesn't install easily on the Raspberry (or Windows for that matter) so most USB port could be remplaced by 2-3 USB-C port (You could use one for display and one for power).

    In my mind, the ultimate RaspPi would have :

    - Same specs as the RaspZero or better
    - WiFi and Bluetooth integrated
    - 2-3 USB-C port
    - 1 Four-pole 3.5mm connector (Analogic Video + Audio)
    - Micro-SD slot
    - 40 pin with 26+ GPIO with a few more feature (Surge protection, Drive, more power, Possibility to raise to 5V, Analogic GPIO, etc.)

    --
    Elok
    1. Re:Sadly, still no Wifi/Bluetooth by Eloking · · Score: 1

      In my mind, the ultimate RaspPi would

      not exist because its manufacturing costs would push it out of competition, and most users would be paying for stuff they are not using

      fail, fail, fail

      How exactly?

      Are you saying that...

      -The price of an inboard Wifi Bluetooth would be that high? (I've saw chip under 1$ for both case)
      -USB-C cost too much? (I saw some connector at 3$ each but I expect it'll drop soon enough and we're talking about replacing current connector that cost money)
      -The 3.5mm connector would cost too much? (Please)
      -All aditional GPIO feature would cost so much? (Granted, analogic GPIO would be a challenge. But most other feature cost nearly nothing in term of component.)

      --
      Elok
    2. Re:Sadly, still no Wifi/Bluetooth by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      When the selling price of the whole board is only 5$, adding two ICs for 0.50~1.00$ each just increased your BOM drastically.

    3. Re:Sadly, still no Wifi/Bluetooth by Eloking · · Score: 1

      When the selling price of the whole board is only 5$, adding two ICs for 0.50~1.00$ each just increased your BOM drastically.

      As you may have noticed, 5$ price point was not in my list for the ultimate Pi. And I'm quite sure people won't mind paying 6-7$ for the same board with, let's say, the Wifi/bluetooth/3.5mm/UpgradedGPIO.

      --
      Elok
  17. Not actually available now by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is element14 still in business?

    SBC, RASPBERRY PI ZERO
    [generic broken product image]
    Image is for illustrative purposes only. Please refer to product description Manufacturer: RASPBERRY-PI
    Mfg Part No: RASPBERRYPI-ZERO

    Price: $23.17 (Price is before tax)
    Out of Stock
    Price: $13.50 (Price is before tax)
    0 ship now

    So in short, the product is not immediately available (it's sold out in the Swag shop also) and when it is, it won't be $5 unless you order it direct. And then, if you don't live in the UK, you'll have to pay an assload of shipping.

    Where can I buy R-Pi in a B&M store in the USA, so that I can actually get it for $5? And when will it actually be available?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Not actually available now by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      are you gonna cry and throw a tantrum if you can't have it RIGHT NOW or are you going to understand the reality of the supply pipeline

      Actually, I'm going to complain about how Eben, Liz, and the Pi Foundation in general set unrealistic expectations. For example, Liz demonstrating Android ICS on the Pi and then never releasing the code, nor an explanation for why not (probably Broadcom contractual bullshit) or now Eben claiming that the Pi Zero is immediately available when it is not immediately available. Why do they have to tell lies? Why can't "coming soon" be good enough?

      Now, why can't you demonstrate even the minuscule amount of courage needed to log in before talking shit? Concerned you'll lose your editor job?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Not actually available now by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      it was immediately available, you just were too late (and so was this article :p)

    3. Re:Not actually available now by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      it was immediately available, you just were too late (and so was this article :p)

      Even assuming that was true, it wasn't immediately available for $5 anywhere in the world, unless you got it "free" with a magazine nobody should want because better information is always available online. Why not just wait to announce immediate availability until more than a handful of people can get it immediately? It wouldn't cost anything to just tell it like it is instead of inflating the story to look good.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Not actually available now by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      You do realise how you lose credibility when you accuse people of lying when you have no evidence that is the case? Have you never heard of popular products selling out? You sound like an entitled arse when you demand everything must be available for your personal use immediately. Earlier in this very thread people have reported getting theirs, so patently it was available.

      Goliaths like Google and Apple struggle to get the right amount of stock on release day, because predicting demand is hard, let alone a charity with limited resources like RPi.

    5. Re:Not actually available now by Racemaniac · · Score: 2

      yes it was, at least at pihut you could opt for not going with the package, and just get the pi zero for the stated price.
      and they probably had a few thousand pieces available, with only 1 per customer allowed, so i don't know what you call a handful of people...

    6. Re:Not actually available now by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      It was 5$USD at Adafruit, there was 43 units left after I received the notification email. After seeing the nearly 11$USD shipping cost to Canada, I removed it from my cart. There was only four units left. I reloaded the page once more, they were all gone.

      All of this happened within about three minutes.

    7. Re:Not actually available now by VMaN · · Score: 1

      Why not just wait to announce immediate availability until more than a handful of people can get it immediately? It wouldn't cost anything to just tell it like it is instead of inflating the story to look good.

      Why should I have to wait to order till there is enough to go around?

    8. Re:Not actually available now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It was 5$USD at Adafruit, there was 43 units left after I received the notification email. After seeing the nearly 11$USD shipping cost to Canada, I removed it from my cart.

      Yes, this is part of my point. Nobody can get these for $5. Everyone has to pay more in shipping than what the item costs. I can buy an Arduino Nano from fucking China and get it for $3.50 shipped. So my question was, when can I actually walk into a store and get one for five bucks? Apparently that was trolling.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Not actually available now by tresho · · Score: 1

      Where can I buy R-Pi in a B&M store in the USA, so that I can actually get it for $5? And when will it actually be available? You left out the necessity to pay sales tax in most US states at B&M stores. So I had to pay $5.40 US Cash for mine, 20:30 EST on 27 Nov 2015 at a MicroCenter in Ohio. Of course they had already been sold out for hours, the only reason I got one was I ordered it online the previous day as soon as I learned the Zero was available.

    10. Re:Not actually available now by gozar · · Score: 1

      So in short, the product is not immediately available (it's sold out in the Swag shop also) and when it is, it won't be $5 unless you order it direct. And then, if you don't live in the UK, you'll have to pay an assload of shipping.

      Where can I buy R-Pi in a B&M store in the USA, so that I can actually get it for $5? And when will it actually be available?

      I walked into Micro Center on Black Friday and picked one up for $5. While I was there, I looked around and was quite surprised how competitive Micro Center has become with pricing.

      --
      What, me worry?
    11. Re:Not actually available now by dave420 · · Score: 1

      When? Between them going on sale and them being sold out. You being slow off the mark is not the fault of anyone else.

  18. New meaning of mini-computer by johnw · · Score: 3, Informative

    To me, "mini-computer" still means something that only requires two or three 6' cabinets - as opposed to a mainframe, which needs a whole room full.

    1. Re:New meaning of mini-computer by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Go ahead, tell the kids to get off your lawn.

  19. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As is, this Raspberry is quite useless...

    No, it's useless for what you want to use it for.
    Engage your brain and do a bit for browsing to see what people have been using their Pis for, you'll see plenty of project that don't use any of the things you're whinging about.

  20. Too bad they left off the camera header by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That would have been a neat platform for aerial video.

  21. About that... by bytesex · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know of a place where you can *still* get one? Or get on a waiting list or something?

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:About that... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      http://www.adafruit.com/produc...

      I was about to order one, but the shipping cost to Canada is more than twice the price of the RPiZ itself.

    2. Re:About that... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Well, I was on the "notify me" email list.

      When I loaded the page, there was 43 units in stock.

      When I checked again after writing my reply to you, there was 5 units in stock.

      One page reload later, it's out of stock. Sorry.

  22. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    As is, this Raspberry is quite useless... You need to add
    - a SD card

    $2

    some header

    No. No I don't. I can solder direct. For my application, that's actually more useful to me.

    an USB Hub

    If I even use the USB functionality at all, I shall use it to connect perhaps one device. Therefore, I only need some micro USB connectors. I got five minis for two bucks, I'm sure micro connectors are plenty cheap. Or I can pop the USB connectors right off the boards, and just solder magnet wire to the pads. I only wish they had brought in power on an unpopulated header connector instead of on a usb connector which I'm going to have to desolder.

    Some adapters (micro-USB to USB host, HDMI)

    I don't need the HDMI. If I use the GPU at all, it'll be for computing and not for video output. Already discussed the USB adapter issue, which for me is a non-issue.

    Useless product... Microcontrollers (AVR/PIC/...) or conventionnal Raspberry/BBB/... are much more useful.

    You can use this to do precisely what you do with a microcontroller; this is going to replace Arduino for a lot of uses.

    The real problem is going to be actually getting them for $5. element14 is sold out and wants $13.50 for one even if they had one!

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not useless as is. If you have one specific task for the Pi then you wont need a lot of that stuff. Why pay for ethernet if you wont be using it? Sure this isn't for everyone but I can see things it would be usefull for and I know at 5 bucks a pop it'll wind up doing a lot of things.

  24. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by hattig · · Score: 1

    Chances are you will own: a spare SD card, a spare keyboard, a spare mouse, an old monitor (if you don't use a TV), and even an old USB hub.

    The adaptors are included in a £3 add-on pack you can get at one of the UK retailers, if you need them. I've also seen a £4 case too already.

    Other Raspberry Pis also need an SD card, a keyboard, a mouse, and a monitor. You get the USB hub and ethernet built in, but not WiFi or Bluetooth.

    Give it a month and someone will make a PiZero format powered USB hub that stacks under this board and provides several needed ports and functionalities. Indeed I think it is a shame that this PiZero actually uses micro-usb ports, I think headers would have been more useful.

    As an aside, I hope that the next "Big Pi" has built in WiFi and Bluetooth.

  25. CHIP seems like the better deal by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CHIP has WiFi, Bluetooth, and 4Gbytes of NAND built in, all things you need to add to the Raspberry Pi.

  26. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    This isn't aimed at those applications. It's aimed firmly at embedded - situations where you need a bit more processing power than an arduino can provide, or a real operating system. It has the essentials for that: GPIO, UART and USB. You might hook up a monitor and keyboard for development or configuration, but they won't be connected in general use.

  27. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

    I only wish they had brought in power on an unpopulated header connector instead of on a usb connector which I'm going to have to desolder.

    Two of the pins (+5V and any GND) on the 40-pin connector can be used to supply power instead of going through the USB port. That's what I did with my beer-fridge controller: power for the whole system comes through the barrel connector on the 1-Wire/I2C interface board in the middle of the stack.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  28. Re:All fine and dandy, but... by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is actually a doing a Windows 10 for the Raspberry Pi - it's called Windows 10 IoT. Think that's quite a pretentious name, given that there is no guarantee that it'll work on Arduinos or BeagleBones, or that the Pi will be the dominant platform used in the Things that will hook into the internet

  29. How does Pi compare to PDP-11 by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Aren't they the size of a filing cabinet?

    That was just the external hard drive, more a full sized rack in their 1st generation, plus another rack for peripherals. They eventually got down to desktop workstation size. Maybe palm sized now with the Pi. How does a Pi with a remote text terminal session compare performance wise to a PDP-11 :-)

    1. Re:How does Pi compare to PDP-11 by JanneM · · Score: 1

      How does a Pi with a remote text terminal session compare performance wise to a PDP-11 :-)

      Way faster, way more capable. I worked with a PDP11 on a summer job. If I remember correctly, it had 2x64KB memory (data and code pages); the Pi has more main memory than the PDP had hard rive storage.

      It managed to support about a dozen concurrent users that used it for monitoring an industrial process. It was tight enough, though, that we had to stop people using a full-screen clock application, since it couldn't cope with all terminals running it at the same time.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:How does Pi compare to PDP-11 by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere the TI MSP430 line of micro controllers are based on the old pdp 7/9/11 line

  30. Maybe you only need a USB wifi adapter by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Actually all I really need to add is the same USB wifi adapter I've been using on Pis for years, US$10. At that points its a Linux box I can ssh in to.

  31. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Two of the pins (+5V and any GND) on the 40-pin connector can be used to supply power instead of going through the USB port. That's what I did with my beer-fridge controller: power for the whole system comes through the barrel connector on the 1-Wire/I2C interface board in the middle of the stack.

    Guess I shoulda looked at the pinout before leaving that comment. What do you need for I2C? Is it more than some resistors? Hmm, I looked and it seems you just connect up the pins. Internal pullups? on-board? Leaves it to external? I am way too lazy to hunt through the docs to find out. Did you put in some fuses or something? My experience with I2C is so far limited to connecting Arduinos to IMUs and so on. Also did the SPI sdcard thing there with the sdfat lib. Hooray for electronic tinkertoys.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. Or maybe the Dingleberry Pie by argee · · Score: 1

    Hark to Captain Kirk fighting off Klingons while orbiting Uranus.

  33. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

    If you're OK with 3.3V I/O, connecting straight to the header will work. My board puts level shifters (a transistor and a couple of resistors each) on the 1-Wire and I2C pins for 5V I/O. It also includes a clock (connected over I2C) and an SSR controller (a DS2406 connected to the 1-Wire bus). Since I was going to put a DS18B20 temperature sensor inside a refrigerator at the end of a long cable, 5V I/O would be preferable.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  34. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by tresho · · Score: 1

    Chances are you will own: a spare SD card, a spare keyboard, a spare mouse, an old monitor (if you don't use a TV), and even an old USB hub I already had multiple versions of all these items when I bought my Zero yesterday.

  35. Re:Much Better Deal Right Now by tresho · · Score: 1

    Dollar General is advertising a Samsung Galaxy Centura Android phone for $9.99, compatible only with the Tracfone system. As far as I know, this Android phone would make a passable (but small) tablet without ever needing to be activated as a cell phone.

  36. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by Vapula · · Score: 1

    It looks like you don't know PICs and AVRs... 18F2550/18F4550 for example include USB hardware support... As do Mega 32U4 and other on AVR side.

    SD support is nothing more than SPI and is supported by all these microcontroller

    Remains the video output... but this strongly restrict the usecases where you'd need such a device... And most low-cost monitors (less than 20$, 4.5" go as low as 12$ on Aliexpress and other) DON'T support HDMI anyway..

    Pi1 and Pi2 don't need USB Hub, have regular USB connectors (not micro-USB) and have onboard network so these extra costs don't apply...

    Many people tend to forget that there are many devices beside Raspberries and Arduinos...

  37. Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C by dave420 · · Score: 1

    You also need:

    - A network to connect it to ($loads)
    - A house in which to set it up ($loadsmore)
    - A human being to set it up ($ridiculous)
    - etc. etc. etc.

    You don't seem to know when to draw the line. We get it - it's useless for you, but as you are not the arbiter of what is useful and not, that is just your personal opinion and has literally no bearing on the rest of humanity.

  38. Raspberry guys incompetent as hardware designers by viking80 · · Score: 1

    I hate to be swearing in church. Raspberry guys incompetent as hardware designers. They fumbled for almost a decade with nothing, and then found a complete system on a chip from Broadcom. All they had to do was to make a breakout board. They committed errors no professional HW designers would do.
    - They did not know they needed magnetics in the ethernet interface, so the first run did not work.
    - Picked a very poor chip for power supply that wasted a lot of power for no apparent reason .. and that is pretty much all the design that was done. The rest was mostly pinouts.

    On the other hand,
    My hat off for incredible handling of marketing, community interaction and many successes.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org