Slashdot Mirror


Pressure From Uber Forces London Taxis To Finally Accept Cards (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Following a public consultation that compared the service unfavorably with Uber, London's 21,000 black cabs will finally accept card payment from October of 2016, with a possible option to pay via PayPal. London Mayor Boris Johnson continues to support and defend the legendarily expensive and iconic taxi service, saying 'This move will boost business for cabbies and bring the trade into the 21st century by enabling quicker and more convenient journeys for customers'. Most Londoners feel that the move should have been made in the 1980s, and the consultation report indicates that Uber's increasing share of London fares has forced the innovation.

114 comments

  1. Just stop now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, this is starting to get a bit ridiculous. Can we please stop with all the articles vaguely related to Uber that have zero tech interest.

    This is a site for techies, not taxi enthusiasts.

    1. Re:Just stop now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Next Up on Slashdot: Uber CEO's favorite pastries at local shindig cause uproar!

    2. Re:Just stop now by quantaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay, this is starting to get a bit ridiculous. Can we please stop with all the articles vaguely related to Uber that have zero tech interest.

      This is a site for techies, not taxi enthusiasts.

      I actually think this is one of the better ones with a tech interest.

      I'm not a fan of Uber and their flagrant lawbreaking, but one of the arguments in favour of them is that the taxi industry was broken, and I think this is a good example of that.

      London cabs don't accept credit cards?!?! I don't see how you can look at that fact and imagine it is anything resembling a healthy market. I still don't like Uber but this really does show how tech can be disruptive in a positive way.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Just stop now by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      London cabs don't accept credit cards?!?!

      Most black cabs already do. Addison Lee has had an app with driver tracking, credit card payments and so on for years. This is kind of massively not news.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Just stop now by tompaulco · · Score: 0

      Okay, this is starting to get a bit ridiculous. Can we please stop with all the articles vaguely related to Uber that have zero tech interest.

      This is a site for techies, not taxi enthusiasts.

      I actually think this is one of the better ones with a tech interest.

      I'm not a fan of Uber and their flagrant lawbreaking, but one of the arguments in favour of them is that the taxi industry was broken, and I think this is a good example of that.

      London cabs don't accept credit cards?!?! I don't see how you can look at that fact and imagine it is anything resembling a healthy market. I still don't like Uber but this really does show how tech can be disruptive in a positive way.

      Taking a credit card in the cab is a lot more difficult technologically then dinking a credit card already on file via an app. By innovating like this, the cab industry is far ahead of Uber.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:Just stop now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if a Uber's representative had sweared, would that be still newsworthy?

    6. Re: Just stop now by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I love uber because I live in a medium sized city (250k people in a 30-45 minute to cross by car metro area).

      How it used to work with cabs:
      I call, they ask where I am. They kind of grumble and asknwhere I'm going. Then they say, nope. Try again with company two, they agree, tell me a driver will be there in 45 minutes, driver comes in 90. Driver is a dick about the trip not being long enough, and refuses to take cards "oh, no, that's really just for the airport, that's why it's painted on our car that we accept them for all fairs". Driver also is always asking me for directions.

      With uber. Push button, five minutes later a driver shows up, happily GPSs to my location, and I give them five star rating.

      The cab industry's legality was merely a way for them to be abusively anti consumer. I'm glad a company came and skirted the law to make getting a ride something I can do and a pleasant experiance. If the cab industry's protectionism was a give and take, I'd feel different. For example the post office pretty efficiently delivers letters, and they do it cheaply nationwide, while maintaining plenty of physical presence. They're exclusive priveledge of non express mail allows them to service areas cheaply that never otherwise would be. The cab industry on the otherhand used the exclusivity to do the opposite ( only serve the absolute most profitable jobs).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:Just stop now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Okay, you lost me. The cab industry is far ahead of Uber because they can do something Uber can also do? The taxi companies have also apparently caught up with the middle aged lady who cuts my hair. Or the small coffee shop I go to occasionally. They all have a little dongle that plugs into their iPhone. It's existed for YEARS. And considering we're talking black cabs specifically, every cab I've taken in every country (US, Italy, Spain, Sweden and probably a few others that aren't coming to mind right now), they've all been able to take credit cards. And this is going back at least 5 years.

    8. Re: Just stop now by zidium · · Score: 1

      In Colombia, the good cabs will take you to your destination, driving in circles or half circles as much as possible, and making sure to take the most congested streets to push up the time value.

      The not-so-good cabbies will drive you in circles, make YOU provide the directions, get aggro'd when you say that walking is faster, and show you their machete on the side of their chair.

      The bad cabbies will drive you in circles, to the freakin mountains, scream and shout when you say, "POLICIA! POLICIA!" while taking a picture of them on your phone, and then let you out, demanding double what the meter says ;-) They will also show you the machete and curse at your bad Spanish.

      Absolutely none of them will speak a lick of English.

      I've run into two not-so-good cabbies and one horrible one (who did, in fact, take me to the mountains and pounded his fist and yelled when I told him he was mistaken) via Uber, but Uber support rectified them within 2 hours of me rating them 1-star.

      In Bogota, Colombia, Uber is the only safe way for non-Hispanics, and the only way to get any sort of recompensation from bad cabbies who will scam you and get aggro'd.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    9. Re:Just stop now by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Uber doesn't take credit cars in the cab. The price is already arranged at the time you book it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:Just stop now by jarkus4 · · Score: 1

      The study a few links deep from the article revealed that in 2014 over 40% of London black cabs did NOT accept card payment. All this stuff is about is making card terminal mandatory for drivers.

    11. Re: Just stop now by Threni · · Score: 1

      If they accept credit cards they'll have to start paying tax!

    12. Re: Just stop now by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      You must live in a different London to me. The majority of black cabs (Addison Lee don't count in the strict definition) absolutely do not take cards. It's cash or nothing. I got in a cab today and that hadn't changed. In my London, black cabs didn't want to take people south of the river for several years. They only ended up doing it when it became a precondition for them to charge even more. If they'd hadn't been incentivised to do so then, to this day, I probably still wouldn't have been able to get home by cab in the early hours of the morning.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    13. Re: Just stop now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, it's Colombia. The fee, even at twice the rate, is like $0.41 American.

    14. Re:Just stop now by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Right, and that's a problem why?

      Having a pre-set price is *better*.

    15. Re:Just stop now by tompaulco · · Score: 0

      Right, and that's a problem why?

      Having a pre-set price is *better*.

      Having a preset price is not how taxi regulations work. The regulations are based on distance. However, that was not the point. The point was that cabs taking credit cards is more advanced because cabs don't know the charge until the end of the trip. So they have to have technology in the cab to charge a credit card. Uber does not have to have equipment in the cab because they charge the card at the home base.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    16. Re:Just stop now by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The city of London tweaks the regulations for their legendary taxi industry - because Uber.
      Smells like opportunistic marketing to me.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:Just stop now by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Having a preset price is not how taxi regulations work.

      So what? Ubers aren't taxis, that's why they're not subject to taxi regulations. They're limousines, so they operate under those laws. Limos have preset prices.

      So they have to have technology in the cab to charge a credit card.

      Sure, and then they refuse to use it.

      Uber does not have to have equipment in the cab because they charge the card at the home base.

      Right, but you still haven't explained how the taxis are "more advanced". They're clearly not. Charging a pre-set price is a superior method, and it's simpler, faster, and easier to do the transaction through a smartphone app rather than on a card reader in some car. This is a pretty good example of KISS. Uber has no need to pollute cars with unnecessary and extremely expensive payment terminals because they've come up with a superior alternative.

    18. Re:Just stop now by jrumney · · Score: 1

      London cabs don't accept credit cards?!?!

      I'm pretty sure I remember paying for London cabs by card as far back as 1999 or 2000. I also remember more recent occurrences of having to ask cab drivers to stop at an ATM on the way, so I guess what is actually happening now is that all cabs will be accepting cards.

    19. Re: Just stop now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I love uber because I live in a medium sized city (250k people in a 30-45 minute to cross by car metro area).

      Uhm. No, you live in a large town, maybe.

    20. Re:Just stop now by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2

      Uber isn't pre-set. They'll give you an estimate, but the actual charge depends on factors like traffic, distance traveled (you might have to re-route around blockages, etc.). One driver told me if his speed drops below some figure (7 maybe?) a time charge starts accumulating. For those reasons, the Uber price isn't fixed at the time you start the trip.

    21. Re: Just stop now by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Fine, my large town had shitty worthless can service, and with uber I now have better service than philly cabs in city limits.

      The contrast is even stronger the more you minimize my town's size (murder town USA fwiw)

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  2. Well thats odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is odd. I've always heard that Uber is evil and is ruining the planet. But every time I see someone get picked up in a Uber car, I see a nice clean car. And the taxis I see are 15 year old dirty pieces of junk that wouldn't even pass inspection. I guess the fact that Taxis can take credit cards is quite a miracle in 2015 though.Silly Uber made it convenient for the customer from the get-go. I guess for Uber the customer is the person wanting a ride. For taxis the customer is the cab company and the politicians they pay off.

    1. Re:Well thats odd by Maritz · · Score: 0

      Taxis and London's black cabs in particular are much better than Uber for reasons too numerous to list.

      Just curious, I have no dog in this fight. What's the best reason?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:Well thats odd by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Taxis and London's black cabs in particular are much better than Uber for reasons too numerous to list .

      I work for the cab company/government so I'm going to spread FUD around instead of writing unpleasant facts.

    3. Re:Well thats odd by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Let me preface this by saying: I've never been to London.

      But, as I understand it, the London cabbies have to take a test they call "The Knowledge" which ensures they know a lot of the details of the layout and how to find your way around in a complicated city like London.

      Apparently this test requires so much actual knowledge and spatial awareness, the cab drivers end up with measurably larger hippocampus afterwards.

      So, my completely unfounded (except for what I've seen on TV) 'understanding' is the amount of studying and training required to be a London cabbie is really extensive, resulting in people who can navigate around an apparently very confusing city.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Well thats odd by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      This argument was extremely good decades ago, but we've had the GPS for a long time now.

    5. Re:Well thats odd by locofungus · · Score: 2

      I hardly ever use black cabs and I've never used uber but these are some things I'd think black cabs would win on:

      1. They can use bus lanes.
      2. They can stop on red routes to pick up and drop off. (I suspect that an uber car will do this too but it's technically not allowed and, if you're unlucky, your car will get waved on before you can get in or get out)
      3. Black cabs can get to places that a mini-cab can't (mostly due to 1)
      4. Black cab drivers have to know the city and their way around central London. This is particularly valuable if you're a) new to the city and might not know the old/new/official/unofficial name of your destination. An uber driver might know, a black cab driver will know and b) when the traffic totally snarls up which it does, the driver will know if this is normal and still the best route or it's abnormal and they should try another route instead.

      I think it will be a shame if Uber causes black cabs to become extinct. I'm not sure that the black cab is that expensive (relative to minicabs) but I suspect sticking to the black cab regulations (turning circle, wheelchair access etc) probably put the cars at a significant disadvantage.

      (I'm not sure how uber gets around the disabled access regulations. Does it guarantee a certain proportion of it's cars will be disabled accessible? Can you request a car suitable for a wheelchair?)

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    6. Re:Well thats odd by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever had a cab driver who had no idea of where they were going but relied on a GPS?

      They end up taking the stupidest possible routes because they have no idea of where they're going. I once had a cab driver who ended up taking what seemed like the most ass-backwards route because he knew less about the city than I did.

      Sometimes, GPS routes are utterly ridiculous.

      I don't want to pay some clown a bunch of extra money because he got stuck in traffic or took a longer route because he had no idea where he was going.

      Some bumbling idiot with no idea of where he's going and hopes the GPS will get him there ... sorry, I'm not paying for that experience. I've seen how that can turn out.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Well thats odd by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever had a cab driver who had no idea of where they were going but relied on a GPS?

      I've had cab drivers who claimed to know where they were doing and then did much worse than a GPS. Granted, they didn't have a fancy-pants test to make sure that they would do better. The thing is that network connected GPS gets better when more people use it, but a person is always just a person. They can get better by studying... or connecting themselves to additional tools, like GPS.

      Sometimes, GPS routes are utterly ridiculous.
      I don't want to pay some clown a bunch of extra money because he got stuck in traffic or took a longer route because he had no idea where he was going.

      Right, but that's the merit of realtime, network-connected routing. The more people use it, the better it works. It gets more data back, so it can make more accurate estimations and send you down more efficient routes. If you know a shortcut, and you can outdo the GPS, then by all means take that route while using GPS navigation and let the network learn from you instead of complaining about how bad it is!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Well thats odd by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how uber gets around the disabled access regulations

      The exact same way they get around regulations everywhere they operate: by pretending the regulations don't apply to them.

      My city has mandatory cameras in cabs -- because cab drivers have committed sexual assaults, and because cab drivers get robbed. The fought it tooth and nail until one of their own was violently robbed and the camera would have helped with the conviction.

      Uber, like with insurance and proper licensing, doesn't adhere to this. Uber's entire business model is being an bootleg cab dispatch company which ignores the rules and regulations. That's kind of that they do.

      When you ride with Uber, you're just getting into a stranger's car. And that doesn't always work so well.

      Everyone whinges about Uber undermining the taxi monopoly ... the reality is, Uber is pretty much ignoring laws around proper licensing, insurance, background checks, and anything else.

      So you really have no idea of what the hell you'll get.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Well thats odd by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

      I believe you have encountered an example of Poe's Law.

    10. Re:Well thats odd by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      5. A black cab can go the long way around and charge extra.

    11. Re:Well thats odd by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this has allowed people who just arrived in the country, who have never driven on the correct side of the road, becoming taxi drivers and if their satnav goes down, they are lost. And GPS signal can get lost in a bunch of tall buildings

      Black Cabs win every time, you can even get a wheelchair or pram into the back of the cab.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    12. Re:Well thats odd by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      you got that correct, its takes about 3 years to complete. they know all the back streets required to avoid jams etc.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    13. Re: Well thats odd by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      So basically, black cabs are objectively better and should be able to maintain a price premium?

      What they should do then is do what the cabs do in San Fransisco, and get themselves added as a button in uber.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    14. Re:Well thats odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I understand, and this is coming from listening to too much hello internet, according to CGP Grey, in London, Uber drivers are required to be licensed taxi drivers, so any claim that the black cab drivers are more qualified goes out the window, if what CGP Grey said is true. And based off his reputation, I tend to believe him. He's not known for spouting off about things he knows nothing about.

    15. Re:Well thats odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. A black cab driver will talk inanely about some minor celebrity they had in the back of the cab, racist/sexist stereotypes, or the weather.

    16. Re: Well thats odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are required to have the basic minicab license, but not the black can license.

      So safety etc is fine, but not navigation.

    17. Re:Well thats odd by v1 · · Score: 1

      Everyone whinges about Uber undermining the taxi monopoly ... the reality is, Uber is pretty much ignoring laws around proper licensing, insurance, background checks, and anything else.

      The biggest (and arguably most legitimate) excuse I see given is simply that the laws were written not to serve the public good, but to reinforce the monopoly the local cabl companies have, and has in many cases lead to a profound drop in service without the expected drop in cost that you find in a free market.

      It's well-established that most successful companies exploit any advantage they can, so it's not the least bit surprising that they lower quality of service to cut costs because it has no net impact on their revenue, which can only serve to increase proffits. This only encourages a drop in quality of service, relative to cost.

      In SOME respects I can understand why there are laws that encourage the monopolies. There are certain markets where competition can lead to a drop in average quality due to redundant overhead, such as power companies. I can also see where this could apply to some extend to cab service, in specific (usually small) cities. Some businesses you need to maintain a certain minimim customer base so you can do things on a profitable scale. But there's no reason for that in a big city like London.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    18. Re:Well thats odd by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Hence Uber's ranking system.
      I dislike the company in many ways, but you can ding a poor driver in Uber.
      Good luck doing that with a "normal" cab anywhere...

    19. Re:Well thats odd by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      as I understand it, the London cabbies have to take a test they call "The Knowledge" which ensures they know a lot of the details of the layout and how to find your way around in a complicated city like London.

      This is true, but GPS can obviate most of the benefits of having "The Knowledge", aside from some possible delays due to unforeseen traffic, and even then you can often tell the GPS to find an alternate route.

      The Knowledge thing/test/whatever is pretty impressive but it dates from a pre-GPS period when that kind of training was very beneficial. Now it's probably moderately beneficial at best.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    20. Re:Well thats odd by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I think it will be a shame if Uber causes black cabs to become extinct.

      Same here, but this is just part and parcel of the way of the world- things change. Some of the things that get left behind will be missed, but without artificial constraints there's no way around it- some things will inevitably drop off or disappear.

      When I was young our neighborhood had a milkman who came to almost every house and dropped off milk every morning or maybe every coupe of days...it eventually became impractical for various reasons, mostly related to the costs of running a fleet of milk trucks. I kind of miss it, but there was no way it could continue to be practical (profitable) given all of the forces acting against such a service.

      Is it a bad thing that milkmen are gone? Maybe, but it's the way things evolve. Some stuff gets left behind because it's no longer feasible, practical, relevant, profitable, etc etc. It is the way of the world, for better or worse.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    21. Re:Well thats odd by Seizurebleak · · Score: 1

      What a preposterous argument. Should Walmart then, also be illegal for selling inferior products and driving quality out of business?

    22. Re:Well thats odd by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I don't want to pay some clown a bunch of extra money because he got stuck in traffic or took a longer route because he had no idea where he was going.

      The one good thing about driving a cab is it teaches you how to handle arseholes - I would have thrown you out of the cab at the next bus stop

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    23. Re: Well thats odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked the Uber page for London a week or few back when there was another discussion.
      One of the things that led me to feeling slightly less disfavourable towards Uber was that you could book a black cab using it.

    24. Re: Well thats odd by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      San Fransisco works that way too, and it's not !much of a premium. You get better cab service too, because they're still ranked. The cab industry (not the cabbies) destroyed themselves in the US. They were jerks to their customers, we hate them, and now they suffer.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    25. Re:Well thats odd by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's a lot more than just a "fancy-pants test". So much more. They know pretty much everything about London. Try entering "Half-way down that road opposite the old Tesco's in Essex Road" into your GPS and see where that leads you. Cabbies know London intimately. They know how the traffic at a given location is, and how it will be in 30 minutes. They know which roads have temporary closures, which legal-for-them-but-not-for-non-cabbies short-cuts they can take, and so on. GPS is truly a wonderful invention - I absolutely love it. Having used black cabs for years, it's clear they have nothing in a black cabby.

  3. Implementation is questionable by paiute · · Score: 1

    Here in Boston, cabbies would say that the machine was broken because they wanted you to pay cash and not have to send the card company 5% or whatever. So the city raised rates to compensate for that fee. Guess what? "The machine is broken" is what you will hear most of the time if you offer a card at the end of the ride.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Implementation is questionable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's easy to fix - Include the 5% fee in the credit card transaction, but not in any cash transaction. Then there is no incentive either way.

    2. Re:Implementation is questionable by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Well, that's easy to fix - Include the 5% fee in the credit card transaction, but not in any cash transaction.

      That is a violation of the CC company rules. If you charge extra for CCs, then they will revoke your merchant card account. There are a few exceptions for this rule, such as gas stations, which are allowed to charge a fee. But I doubt if they will allow it for taxis.

      An easier fix is to say you don't have any cash, but if they are willing to drive you to an ATM with the meter off, you can pay them. Suddenly the CC swiper will work.

    3. Re:Implementation is questionable by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "The machine is broken" is what you will hear most of the time if you offer a card at the end of the ride.

      And if I heard that, "I don't carry cash" is what the driver would hear, whether it was true or not. They can run the card or they can have an IOU. If they don't tell you about their defective equipment up front, they don't have a leg to stand on when they complain about a lack of immediate payment. Then you can watch them pretend to "try" to get it to work, the disingenuous bastards.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Implementation is questionable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why lots of shops now offer discounts when paying with cash.

    5. Re:Implementation is questionable by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      [Including the 5% fee in the credit card transaction] is a violation of the CC company rules. If you charge extra for CCs, then they will revoke your merchant card account.

      So instead of charging 5% to use a credit card, raise the price by 5% and offer a 5% discount for paying in cash. The credit card companies don't mind when you do this.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    6. Re:Implementation is questionable by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Well, that's easy to fix - Include the 5% fee in the credit card transaction, but not in any cash transaction.

      That is a violation of the CC company rules. If you charge extra for CCs, then they will revoke your merchant card account. There are a few exceptions for this rule, such as gas stations, which are allowed to charge a fee. But I doubt if they will allow it for taxis.

      An easier fix is to say you don't have any cash, but if they are willing to drive you to an ATM with the meter off, you can pay them. Suddenly the CC swiper will work.

      If you make the extra charge a separate line item, the CC processors generally allow it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  4. Legendarily expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legendary as in King Arthur, I suppose. Black cab pricing is often less than minicabs for the same journey. You don't want to take one for twenty miles, but around town they're not really that different. And there's no surge pricing.

  5. Wut? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

    Half the London Cabbies I've ridden with have card readers in the car, at least 90% of the ones I've gotten in Zone 1 had stickers saying they accepted them.. Cellular connected card readers aren't super high tech..

    I half remember a small fee for using the card, but that's nothing new, most convenience stores charge something.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Wut? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      The question is, were said cabbies doing it out of their own pockets in order to better appeal to customers?

      Based on the article, it sounds like the overarching corporation didn't give two shits about customer-focus, thanks to their monopoly.

    2. Re:Wut? by mccalli · · Score: 1

      The difference seems to be making it mandatory - at the moment it's optional.

      Try actually doing it though. Magically, almost every time I've asked the card reader somehow seems to be out of order and they need cash instead. Astonishing co-incidence.

    3. Re:Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I half remember a small fee for using the card, but that's nothing new, most convenience stores charge something.

      Around here only the "99 Cent Oriental Grocery" stores do that. They also won't let you use a card for a purchase less than $20 or $30. If you try they say "This probrem. You no buy! Not 30 dollah!"

    4. Re:Wut? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Answer his question.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:Wut? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Answer his question.

      No!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Wut? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about. But trust me.... You don't.

      We have no reason to believe that you are anything other than that which you are labeled, an anonymous coward who likes to talk shit but who won't back anything up.

      I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about.

      You mean like a cab driver who thinks they know traffic conditions better than a computer network that gets reports on it in real time? Even proponents of the black cab system have to admit that the best reason to keep it around is that it creates jobs. Meanwhile, it is one of the more expensive systems.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Wut? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      What - and whose - question?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    8. Re:Wut? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Based on the article, it sounds like the overarching corporation didn't give two shits about customer-focus, thanks to their monopoly.

      What overarching corporation?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Wut? by mccalli · · Score: 2

      "I drive a black cab in London, so I'm really getting a kick out of some of these replies."
      Cool. I use black cabs in London - the same for the replies.

      "Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about. But trust me.... You don't."
      I do, in fact, know exactly what it's like to use a black cab in London. Because I do, and have been doing so for more than eighteen years. You will be right in that I don't know the ins and outs of the industry, but I don't need to - I only need to say what it's like as a user. Most of the time I'm happy, but the card thing is definitely my experience and is truly irritating. I always ask up front, and the vast majority of the time I'm told the card reader is broken and that they'll drive to a cash point.

      "I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about. This is how bad info gets passed around. If you dont know about the topic....Don't make yourself sound like you do."
      I read the article. It said "...come into force from April of 2016 and by October all black cab drivers will need to have complied with the directive, which mandates the new payment methods.". Hence the comment "The difference seems to be making it mandatory". Still seems reasonably grounded as a suggestion to me, and you've not made a different one.

      This is primarily a discussion board. If you know more, now's the time to post it and then your point of view is added to the discussion. Would be good to get that point of view in fact. Meanwhile, since it hasn't been added, what I have to go on is the article itself and my years of experience using cabs of all types in London.

    10. Re:Wut? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Well, I could try believing you.

      Oh, wait, you didn't give me any sort of refutation or alternate story to believe in. I guess you lose. Better luck next time.

    11. Re:Wut? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      There isn't one? How can a bunch of cabbies all be running under the same banner if there isn't one? Otherwise there'd be copyright lawsuits flying over cab design, etc.

      Then again, this isn't America we're talking about, so maybe people are actually able to be civil with each other without requiring contracts and money changing hands.

    12. Re:Wut? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      How can a bunch of cabbies all be running under the same banner if there isn't one?

      To be able to pick up passengers by hailing, use taxi ranks and taxi lanes, a license is regarded from the local council. The council sets the rules, and that includes things like the knowledge, turning radius of vehicles, disabled access, rate per mile, and so on and so forth.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  6. Credit cards are 21 century? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "bring the trade into the 21st century"

    Talk about old farts being in charge.

    1. Re:Credit cards are 21 century? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Most Londoners feel that the move should have been made in the 1980s, and the consultation report indicates that Uber's increasing share of London fares has forced the innovation.

      So it's three decades late but it's still an innovation according to them.

  7. competition by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    p
    who'd a thunk it.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  8. Card reader broken? Then no tip by gurps_npc · · Score: 2
    simple problem, simple fix.

    Why would you tip someone that is going out of their way to give you bad service?

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re: Card reader broken? Then no tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay for a service at set rates, why tip at all?

  9. In other news by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    Capitalism and Free Markets work.

  10. What about the London Knowledge test? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    What about the London Knowledge test? who about dumping that or refund the fees to the drivers to make it more fair as the uber drivers don't have to take that test?

    1. Re:What about the London Knowledge test? by Serif · · Score: 1

      What about the London Knowledge test? who about dumping that or refund the fees to the drivers to make it more fair as the uber drivers don't have to take that test?

      Agreed. This is another anachronism in a world where cheap, reliable sat nav is readily available.

    2. Re: What about the London Knowledge test? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      Either
      1) the test has value and the driver's can remain a premium service, maybe even get added to uber like cabs in San fransisco
      2) the knowledge is not if value and should be ditched.

      I hear a lot of cab advocates trying to have it both ways. "it's no fair, our service is so much better because of the specific cars and the test, but uber drivers don't". If the service was so much better, there wouldn't be an issue, it's been a while since I was in London, but in northern Delaware, Philadelphia, and NYC, uber is far better than the cab companies. Probably because they know pulling bullshit will get them a low review and out of the service. In my location, I'd pay a 10% premium to use uber over cabs.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:What about the London Knowledge test? by Computershack · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This is another anachronism in a world where cheap, reliable sat nav is readily available.

      Using Satnav in lots of parts of London, especially the older parts, is a fucking nightmare. When you can actually get a GPS signal the streets are so close together and turns so near to each other that usually you find that the voice guidance is still playing the first turn when you've driven past the next one you needed to take. Then there's the main thing about the knowledge, knowing how London traffic behaves, knowing what the effects of a problem at any given point in the city would cause not only in that immediate area but further out and being able to route taking those into account long before the Satnav intelligent routing would even be aware of an issue because the effects of that problem had not yet rippled out but would've done long past the point where you could've taken an alternative to avoid the mayhem.

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
  11. As a techie by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    As a techie I find it absolutely amazing that there is a taxi company that didn't accept credit cards. I agree the Uber angle doesn't warrant being mentioned here, but the article has merrit even without that.

    1. Re:As a techie by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      As a techie I find it absolutely amazing that there is a taxi company that didn't accept credit cards.

      First off, many (most?) black cabs in London DO accept credit cards. TFS and TFA are unclear -- but the difference is NOT that you couldn't get a black cab that accepted credit cards before. It's just now ALL black cabs will be required to accept them.

      Second, do you travel much?

      Even in the past year, I've been asked in at least two major cities (in the U.S. and in Europe, not London) whether I needed a cab that accepts credit cards when I ordered one. Five years ago, it was still very common to be asked that question when you ordered a cab. While many cabs accepted them, you simply couldn't depend on it -- and (if my experience is indicative) you still can't depend on it in some places, even major cities.

      I agree the Uber angle doesn't warrant being mentioned here, but the article has merrit even without that.

      Credit cards have been accepted in cabs for many years, but it hasn't been consistent. Now London is forcing all drivers to accept them. While this is of very mild interest to tech people I suppose, it's hardly major news. It's kinda like if a city required all licensed restaurants to accept credit cards instead of being a "cash only" business or location. Would that be of significant tech interest??

      (Actually, if any city tried to do THAT, I'd imagine the discussion here would be the opposite and it'd end up in "Your Rights Online" -- "How DARE they force us into a cashless economy! Today it's forcing businesses to accept credit, tomorrow it's no cash allowed! My right to anonymous transactions must be upheld!!!")

    2. Re:As a techie by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      (Actually, if any city tried to do THAT, I'd imagine the discussion here would be the opposite and it'd end up in "Your Rights Online" -- "How DARE they force us into a cashless economy! Today it's forcing businesses to accept credit, tomorrow it's no cash allowed! My right to anonymous transactions must be upheld!!!")

      I'm sorry, this is BS.

      Cabs accepting credit cards doesn't mean that cash-payers are stuck having to use a card. They can still pay cash. No one is proposing to change this. Uber doesn't take cash, but for the YRO people, that's not a problem because it's well-known up front. You just can't even use Uber without getting cashless payment set up through them. It's not like an Uber car is going to show up and drive you somewhere and then you need to figure out how to pay with a card.

      The problem with these stupid cabs is that they'll say they take cards, but then when you try to actually pay with a card they tell you the card reader is "broken". It's a case of simple lying, and bait-and-switch. I can't image how any anti-cashless-economy or YRO people would be in defense of this; the libertarian crowd is all about people and businesses having maximum freedom within the law, not for them to lie and advertise one thing and do something else, which sounds a lot like fraud to me. I've never heard of any true libertarians being in favor of fraud.

      If the cab companies want to advertise that they accept cards, then they need to do so, plain and simple. This is what people are complaining about: a cab shows up, it may or may not accept cards, they just don't know. You don't have that problem with Uber: you know up front how you have to pay, and you already have it set up to automatically charge you. Uber also gives you a close estimate how much it'll cost up front, whereas with a cab you have little idea, especially if the cabbie drives you in circles or some circuitous route to get a higher fare. In short, Uber's singlehandedly fixed everything wrong with the cab industry.

    3. Re:As a techie by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Second, do you travel much?

      Yes. In the past 2 years I've been over every city in Australia, as well as China, Vanuatu, Japan, Holland, Belgium, Germany, Austria, London too (though I arranged for a pre-paid coach).

      The only places I've paid cash for a taxi was in 2 of the smaller cities in China, and in Vanuatu, but then neither city had any credit or debit infrastructure. So that was to be expected.

      Actually, if any city tried to do THAT, I'd imagine the discussion here would be the opposite and it'd end up in "Your Rights Online" -- "How DARE they force us into a cashless economy!

      Ease up. There are plenty of places in the world that mandate that credit transactions are available. None of them have impinged on your rights to pay cash, if anything they've increased your choices of payment methods.

  12. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    Tip? At what arbitrary point do we decide to tip and who do we tip? Is it too much to ask that people can make a living doing work without having to rely in the generous heart of those people who they are serving?

  13. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    don't have the cash on you ok I have to call the cops. You have to pay for your ride and my card reader is not working.

  14. Christ on a bike! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much is Uber paying for this opinion?

  15. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should have posted this as a reply to someone suggesting not paying as somehow legitimate.

  16. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your card-reader not working is your problem, not your customer's. If you can't be arsed to tell people that your reader is broken until AFTER you arrive, you deserve to be stiffed. See, it's shit service like this that makes people want something better... like Uber.

  17. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    Without tipping, how are we to remind the little people that they are dependent on our largess?

  18. No sympathy for the black cabs by mattrumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi All,

    Rare post from me, but this is close to my heart, being a long term (South) London resident. So... fuck the black cabs, really, they are truly shit in comparison to Uber. It's not just the card payment issue, it's the attitude you get from most of the drivers. They're not really interested in providing a cab service for London. They want to take bankers and tourists on short journeys around central London, and drive people to the airport and back. It can be difficult to find a black cab that will take you any distance "south of the river", so much so, it's even a cultural catch phrase here "Sorry gov, I ain't going south of the river".

    Then, even when you get one, they really do cost. An Uber from central London to my place is about half the cost of a black cab. They're also not that comfortable a ride. Bumpy and cold usually. The only plus point is that they do take 5 passengers as standard, so there is that, minor, minor point....

    Now, due to the black cabs being over priced, and really a bit shit, in true British fashion, rather than face actually making some kind of meaningful change to the system, a fudge has been added. Something called a "mini cab", or more accurately a "private hire vehicle". This is a just a car, no taxi meter, that you can hire to take you from A to B for a fixed price, but you can't hail it on the street, you have to call for one, or go to a pick up location. These vary wildly, from a professional, almost Uber like service such as Addison Lee, mentioned in a previous post, to a banged up, probably non street legal piece of crap driven by someone who looks like they've been awake 72 hours. Often they tout for business on the street (illegally) and, factoring in how late it is/cold the weather/drunk you are, a price is agreed... then often later disputed.

    Anyway, mini cabs are licenced to operate as they do, although there are some totally illegal ones running around. The point is, black cabs never really served their purpose, so the mini cab system just kind of evolved into the cracks. It's the only type of cab most Londoners would have ever considered using.

    Now we have Uber. Clean new cars, professional drivers, cheap, payments sorted in advance, phone app, the works. It's heaven. Actually, I find it interesting, all the US commenters on here talking about Uber being less professional, and operating illegally. The situation is totally different here. It is a superior cab ride in every way, and they are licenced private hire vehicles, so it's all legal. The black cab industry is trying to say that the Uber app on the drivers phone is effectively a taxi meter, and allows what is effectively street hailing, not sure how that is going, is there a court case?

    Anyway, just wanted to get it off my chest. I will be so fucked off if a great service is killed, simply to protect a highly dysfunctional industry that has previously felt no pressure at all to improve their level of customer service. We all hate them anyway. This is an almost perfect "buggy whip manufacturer" situation, please let the black cab just die.

    Phew....

    p.s. I did see a protest by black cab drivers, about Uber, in central London recently, trying in vain to whip up some public support... they're delusional.

    --
    Who's with me?! I SAID... WHO'S WITH ME!!??
    1. Re:No sympathy for the black cabs by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      Hell, try getting a cab to Waterloo or London Bridge (two of London's biggest rail stations, both of them just south of the Thames) during the rush hour. I've been refused multiple times on both of those, because the driver didn't want the hassle of the traffic over the bridges. This is despite the fact that the conditions under which they are granted their monopoly on the pick-up trade stipulate that a taxi driver must:

      - Accept any hiring up to 12 miles or up to one hour duration, if the destination is in Greater London
      - Accept any hiring up to 20 miles if starting at Heathrow Airport

      I don't like Uber's business model of "break the local laws until Government gives in and changes them", but the black cabs were a monopoly in need of breaking.

    2. Re:No sympathy for the black cabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well London is north of the river period. South of the river is not London. If you are very lucky they will go to waterloo/london bridge, but south of the river is a foreign country. (Even if the quickest way north is to cut across the south side)

  19. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead, call the cops. It's not going to do much to help you out. They offered to pay you, you didn't like how they were going to pay you. At that point it's sort of your own fault. If you can't accept credit cards, it's on you to notify them before you drive them. There's a few restaurants that I go to that don't accept credit cards, they have a big friggen sign on their front door that says so.

  20. Lying about accepting cards by Etherwalk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    London cabs don't accept credit cards?!?!

    Most black cabs already do. Addison Lee has had an app with driver tracking, credit card payments and so on for years. This is kind of massively not news.

    I took a cab at one point late last year when Uber didn't work on my phone. The driver pretended his credit card reader wouldn't work in the hope of getting me to pay cash.

    This is, incidentally, the kind of shit that makes people hate cabs.

    1. Re: Lying about accepting cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less tax-free income for cabbies. Shame.

    2. Re:Lying about accepting cards by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      London cabs don't accept credit cards?!?!

      Most black cabs already do. Addison Lee has had an app with driver tracking, credit card payments and so on for years. This is kind of massively not news.

      I took a cab at one point late last year when Uber didn't work on my phone. The driver pretended his credit card reader wouldn't work in the hope of getting me to pay cash.

      This is, incidentally, the kind of shit that makes people hate cabs.

      I had a cabbie once that preferred to do credit card transactions via Square on his phone because it took less of a cut than the machine from the cab company. Worked better for me because I got an emailed receipt with a map of where I was for my expense claim.

      Another time I took a cab and said I would pay by credit. He said "OK, let me take out the machine"

      And he hauled out an imprint machine. This was in the 2010's, and not in the 1980's. Two months later it hit my credit card so I had to file another expense report from the rest of my trip.

  21. Nothing to do with Uber at all. by Computershack · · Score: 1

    It had nothing to do with Uber and everything to do with the fact that this year in the UK more transactions were done by card than cash and the UK is quite quickly heading towards a cashless society and would be if it weren't for refusenik retailers. Lots of people in the UK, myself included, quite simply don't carry cash around anymore.

    --
    I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    1. Re:Nothing to do with Uber at all. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Lots of people in the UK, myself included, quite simply don't carry cash around anymore.

      Then how do you pay for your drugs and whores?

  22. the black cabs are awesome! Keep up the good job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I visit London few times a year and all I can say is that the black cabs are awesome! Keep up the good job!
    It's amazing, how well those guys know the city.

    Uber, GPS is nice but it will not help you to get from A to B by the best rout and London is huge! :)

  23. Most black cabs have had card readers for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most minicabs will let you pay with card or swing past the nearest cash point which is not normally more than a few hundred meters. This all happened years ago.

  24. FakeTaxi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no! This will kill FakeTaki!

  25. Re:the black cabs are awesome! Keep up the good jo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

  26. meh by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    There are still many far better ways to accomplish this if you really cared enough about it.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  27. Warning - Uber astroturf detected by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    And the taxis I see are 15 year[s] old

    Unadulterated bullshit. I drove taxis for 3yrs, the oldest one I drove was 5yo, it had 1.2 MILLION kilometres on the clock.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Warning - Uber astroturf detected by xaxa · · Score: 1

      And the taxis I see are 15 year[s] old

      Unadulterated bullshit. I drove taxis for 3yrs, the oldest one I drove was 5yo, it had 1.2 MILLION kilometres on the clock.

      Which country/city were we discussing? Because the only time I've heard a London cab driver say "kilometers" was when he was spouting racist bullshit about Poland.

      The maximum age of a black cab in London is 15 years, so they are indeed often the oldest vehicles around. Before 2013, they could have been even older.

  28. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    simple problem, simple fix.

    Why would you tip someone that is going out of their way to give you bad service?

    The tip is the tax money they don't pay on your fare.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  29. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

    Where I am from, you cant drive a cab without a working card reader. City and County ordinance. If at the end of the ride they pull a card not working trick, I just say "too bad, thanks for the ride" and walk out. They can call the cops all day.

  30. Re:Card reader broken? Then no tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't have the cash on you ok I have to call the cops. You have to pay for your ride and my card reader is not working.

    The cops know what the people know about most businesses wanting cash only; it's mostly about skimming and avoiding tax liabilities. Do you really want to go there? One too many times and a red flag goes up to anyone wanting a reward on tipoffing the Gov or job points for an investigation leading to an arrest. In some cases (at the top), there's two books -- one to show and the real one.