Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla May Separate Itself From Thunderbird Email Client (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A company-wide memo distributed throughout the Mozilla Foundation by chairperson Mitchell Baker argues that the organization should disentangle itself from the Thunderbird email client in order to focus on Firefox. She said, "Today Thunderbird developers spend much of their time responding to changes made in core Mozilla systems and technologies. At the same time, build, Firefox, and platform engineers continue to pay a tax to support Thunderbird." Both projects are wasting time helping each other, and those demands are only going to get worse. She says many within Mozilla want to see it support community-managed projects without doing the bulk of the work on it, and perhaps Thunderbird could be one of those projects. Baker stresses that no decisions have been made yet — they're starting the conversation early to keep the community involved in what happens to Thunderbird.

24 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. Good idea by aicrules · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It could still live on as an optional add-on, but focusing on making a really good browser is a great idea.

    1. Re:Good idea by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, no kidding ... I'm pretty sure I've not used Mozilla as a mail client in at least a decade, maybe even longer.

      I want a fast, lean, standards compliant browser, which respects my privacy, and isn't trying to do 50 other things.

      Why is that so hard, and why does everyone think Mozilla needs to be a catchall for everything you could possibly do on the internet?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have no idea what you are talking about, right? You make it sound like Thunderbird is part of Firefox. It's not. It's a stand-alone application. Try to learn what you are using.

    3. Re:Good idea by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      focusing on making a really good browser is a great idea.

      Except all the effort they've put into Firefox over the past couple years has been making things worse, breaking things, using more resources, copying the worst parts of Chrome, pushing away users and lowering market-share. I'd rather their focus goes elsewhere, until somebody realizes their mistake.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Good idea by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you like Chrome that much, you could, you know, just use... Chrome.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  2. Re:The cries of a dying business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While they're at it, maybe they can put the buttons and menus back in the most ergonomic, common sense position -- where they were in 2005 before "change for the sake of change" became king.

  3. Thunderbird is more useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unlike the Firefox "browser", Thunderbird is actually kind of useful as an application.

    The Mozilla fpundation should just disband and leave their stuff for adults to handle. If there still is someone willing.

  4. Probably for the best. by sims+2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's probably a good thing.
    Seeing as how mozilla has lost their minds and are tearing out core features of firefox just because they can.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:Probably for the best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      What a load of old cobblers. Forget Firefox - it's passed the point of no return and is doomed to failure.
      Thunderbird works. It's a first-class e-mail client and keeps me - and many,many others - up-to-date with any and all the RSS feeds I care to add to it. It's not sick, just suffering from lack of TLC.

  5. <sarcasm> by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Smart move. Laying off unknown niche products such as Thunderbird, and focusing on widely used projects such as Firefox OS. Way to go, Mozilla, I am sure that's the road to success.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  6. Switch to Windows mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why should Mozilla keep an Open Source email client alive?

    After all, everyone loves Outlook and Windows Mail and Apple Mail, and those corporations know what's best for us.

    1. Re:Switch to Windows mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well personally I use Thunderbird as a front end for gmail (smtp + imap). I find gmails web ui an inferior expirience. Maybe it's just me but i tend to find things quicker in a tree pane view.

    2. Re:Switch to Windows mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Outlook is used by big organizations that don't seem to know any better, there is little to no chance of them moving to Mozilla.

      However most others will use web based tools such as GMAIL just because they are just as handy as any application. With the fact that it won't fill you hard disk up.

      Yeah, the "don't know any better" goes both ways in my experience. After moving from a job using Outlook/Exchange to a job using Gmail and Google Docs, I (and I never thought I was going to say this) really miss Outlook/Exchange. It had it's weaknesses, but Gmail/Docs have so many more of them and seem so lacking in comparison.

      And I'm a year into my new job, so it is not just "time getting adjusted". I increasingly hate working in browser instead of real clients, that has not only better responsiveness and UI but also full offline functionality. Flights used to be perfect for getting some mail done. And I increasingly miss well setup Exchange functionality, especially on the calendar/scheduling side.

      I don't think people not used to a good Outlook/Exchange setup in a corporate setting knows how well functioning it can be. Whenever I mention deficiencies that Gmail/Docs has (vs Exchange), people seem completely unaware that Exchange does this better, even if they agree it could be better than what they have now. They just assume Outlook is some old shit and everything Google is the best shit there is.

    3. Re:Switch to Windows mail? by KGIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally? I'm *very* fond of Thunderbird.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  7. Re:The cries of a dying business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mutt

  8. Anyone else with security concerns? by Steve1952 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am rather amazed that in a post-Snowden world, everyone is just totally fine with doing away with Thunderbird -- arguably one of the most important open source email systems out there. However I do understand why some large companies, such as Google (gmail) and Microsoft (outlook), might want to get rid of the competition. By the way, who is funding Mozilla these days?

  9. Re:The cries of a dying business by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While they're at it, maybe they can put the buttons and menus back in the most ergonomic, common sense position -- where they were in 2005 before "change for the sake of change" became king.

    I would add starting to show full URLs again in the address field, as well.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  10. I guess I'm the only one who likes Thunderbird? by sremick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only person left who actually LIKES and used Thunderbird?

    Enough of the "just use webmail" crap. I do in an emergency, but on established computers I live on regularly, you can't beat the better power, speed and versatility of a native email application running locally. I get far more-features in Thunderbird than my email provider's lightweight and simple web interface.

    Plus Thunderbird is cross-platform and available on my variety on mixed-OS computers, giving me a consistent local-app email experience across them all.

    But I suppose a good portion of the email-app-haters are the same ones as email-haters who would rather use IM, SMS and Facebook messaging rather than proper email. Get off my lawn... some of us actually use the internet for work too, not just play.

    1. Re:I guess I'm the only one who likes Thunderbird? by PvtVoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope. For example, I run my own IMAP server, and access via Thunderbird (or K-9 on my Android device). I'm not sure why TFA calls the product "anachronistic". What should it do in 2015 that it doesn't?

  11. Re:SeaMonkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You need to build Gecko, you need to build libxul. About 95 % of the code of both SM and TB come from those two 'libraries'. And both of those are Mozilla's turf. The builds of Gecko/libxul are the ones breaking, not anything from the SM / TB side.

    How do you propose to simplify that? Do you propose ripping them out, from a product built on them?

  12. Re:And? by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn;'t that what shared libraries are for?

    Yes, provided that upstream can be bothered to keep a stable ABI in the shared libraries.

  13. Re:Prediction by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mozilla Foundation should be renamed the "Google's Ward Off A DOJ Monopoly Investigation Foundation" these days.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  14. Mozilla, Focus on Protecting Users by mx+b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mozilla, I have actually donated to you in the past, but I have to admit my faith and continued donations are really starting to waiver lately.

    Don't get me wrong; its not because of the Australis and UI changes that many people complain about. I actually enjoy those changes, the cross-platform consistency it brought. That's not the issue.

    The issue to me is that I feel like you're slowly abandoning your principles:

    • Incorporation of 3rd party proprietary services such as Pocket and Hello (the calling through Telefonica) seem to give up on principles of open source and control of data
    • Including ads in my new tab window is annoying, and possibly a privacy/security risk depending on where those ads are sourced from (they're not hosted on mozilla servers I'd guess; so do you trust the servers you're pulling from?).
    • Support of the DRM plugins/codecs for video. I know the argument was that you didn't really want to do it but were forced to, but how about principles? What can we do as a movement to try to push for open codecs again? I haven't received email updates on what you're doing to support that.
    • Now, giving up on Thunderbird, which is not just well known and liked, but I think its key selling point is ENCRYPTED PRIVATE email. By necessity, you can't do crypto (encrypted and signed emails) unless its in a mail client. If you want to send a webclient your private key, you're missing the point.

    If you need money, tell us how it is. Lay out your plan for the next 3 years (a very specific vision!), estimate a figure of money, and maybe we can crowdsource it to happen. I think people are less likely to donate if they can't get clarity into what the money is used for (I know I'm that way).

    I think that plan/vision needs to say more specifics like: we're campaigning against all kinds of ads, especially ones that track you and hurt your privacy; we're abandoning 3rd party proprietary things built in to our browser; we're re-focusing on our needs on your security and privacy. We're going to have the most secure browser on the planet, implementing the following list of protocols and standards, we're researching some new protocols and standards and working with the community on them. We're going 64 bit on Windows to take full advantage of performance and security extensions in modern OSes. We're going to make crypto more easy and transparent, both TLS in the browser, but especially we're going to refocus our efforts on Thunderbird and making your email safe with built in idiot-proof PGP encryption and signing. We're also going to work with web vendors to start implementing their own encryption, meaning when you get a notice from your bank, we expect it to be signed by your bank's encryption key and it all happens automagically to keep you safe.

    If I don't start seeing more concrete things like this working for the betterment of the internet and my security and privacy on the internet, then my donation dollars will start looking for other projects. I want to know you're working for me, and not using me only to generate money.

  15. Re:The cries of a dying business by dryeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until that preference is also removed.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism