Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Are Developing Cure for Human Pain (neurosciencenews.com)

transporter_ii writes: Scientists from University College London seem to have come up with a two-pronged treatment regimen they believe would help patients suffering from chronic pain. And in a strange irony, they did it by making it possible for mice – and one human – to feel pain when they previously couldn't. From the story: "To examine if opioids were important for painlessness, the researchers gave naloxone, an opioid blocker, to mice lacking Nav1.7 and found that they became able to feel pain. They then gave naloxone to a 39-year-old woman with the rare mutation and she felt pain for the first time in her life. 'After a decade of rather disappointing drug trials, we now have confirmation that Nav1.7 really is a key element in human pain,' says senior author Professor John Wood (UCL Medicine). 'The secret ingredient turned out to be good old-fashioned opioid peptides, and we have now filed a patent for combining low dose opioids with Nav1.7 blockers. This should replicate the painlessness experienced by people with rare mutations, and we have already successfully tested this approach in unmodified mice.'"

151 comments

  1. "Just a Flesh Wound" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is, pain is remarkably important to humans. It tells us we are too close to the fire, or our finger is broken, or someone has just plunged a knife in our back.

      Sure, there are some people who are constantly in pain that this could held with, and you want some pain relief while you are healing, but even when healing, you don't want the possibility of pain gone [ie, broken arm, you get up to go to the washroom and stub your foot, breaking your toe, you want to find out right then it's broken, not later when doctor tells you to just live with it like that.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by fredgiblet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes...and? They're not proposing permanent treatments I don't think, just providing relief for people with unendingly painful conditions. And even if they are there's people who would certainly want to give up pain. I know someone who's largely non-functional because of chronic pain due to nerve damage. Her quality of life is terrible because of that, I'm sure it's worth the risk to her to be able to actually use both of her arms.

    3. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who suffers from severe chronic daily headaches, I say bring it. I'll at least be able to do work properly and spend quality time with family and friends. I'd happily suffer crooked toes for the rest of my days if my pain is gone.

    4. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by invictusvoyd · · Score: 4, Funny

      The problem is, pain is remarkably important to humans. It tells us we are too close to the fire, or our finger is broken, or someone has just plunged a knife in our back.

      or that we are using Microsoft products or that we are trying to have a conversation with Lennart Poettering

    5. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by doccus · · Score: 1

      The problem is, pain is remarkably important to humans. It tells us we are too close to the fire, or our finger is broken, or someone has just plunged a knife in our back.

      Sure, there are some people who are constantly in pain that this could held with, and you want some pain relief while you are healing, but even when healing, you don't want the possibility of pain gone [ie, broken arm, you get up to go to the washroom and stub your foot, breaking your toe, you want to find out right then it's broken, not later when doctor tells you to just live with it like that.

      Oh please I so DO want the continuous pain nightmare gone. I need continuous applications of topical anaesthetics on my dermal ulcers to literally keep from screaming.. But from the lab to the market is so interminably long that I fear that I will be dead before it EVER hits the market, or doctors will freak about prescribing it, or it will be so expensive that the physical pain will be replaced by financial pain.. :sigh:

    6. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by doccus · · Score: 2

      Yes...and? They're not proposing permanent treatments I don't think, just providing relief for people with unendingly painful conditions. And even if they are there's people who would certainly want to give up pain. I know someone who's largely non-functional because of chronic pain due to nerve damage. Her quality of life is terrible because of that, I'm sure it's worth the risk to her to be able to actually use both of her arms.

      Just noticed your comment.. Indeed, nerve damage is the worst because they are the source of the pain signals. For instance I have 1 to 2 cm deep dermal ulcers that don't heal, but the nerve fibers do grow outside of the injury.. exposed to the air or dressing. It's like 100 abscess teeth! It soo sux. And I sure do feel for that friend of yours and will pray for her, if it helps...

    7. Re:"Just a Flesh Wound" by fredgiblet · · Score: 2

      The best part about nerve damage is that it's not even really relevant. Pain is supposed to tell you about something broken in your body, but nerve damage means you have pain just because!

  2. The Republicans will never... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    let us have this.

    1. Re: The Republicans will never... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You read about amazing new drugs and treatments nearly every week, but they never make it to the people.

  3. "We have now filed a patent ..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every medical doctor "scientist's" dream.

  4. Junkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heroin peddlers, illegal and legal alike, will shut this research down.

    1. Re:Junkies by fafalone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heroin peddlers, illegal and legal alike, will shut this research down.

      Actual heroin dealers are probably thrilled... less access to pills = more demand for powder, as our brilliant drug warriors recently proved by sending tens of thousands of people away from doctors and pharmacists and into the arms of heroin dealers. But better 1000 people suffer in agony than 1 person take his pills to feel good, amirite? The DEA controls how your pain is treated now, not your doctor. And their philosophy? "Not dying soon? Not screaming loud enough to give me a headache? No pain relief for you!"
      As for the legal guys... pretty sure this will be something they can charge out the ass for that you'll have to take at least daily.

    2. Re:Junkies by Lotharus · · Score: 1

      I would love to be on your side on this argument. Do you have any references for your claim of "...brilliant drug warriors recently ... sending tens of thousands of people away from doctors ... and into the arms of heroin dealers"? The implication is that you are referring to a specific incident or government decision, which I would like to know more about.

    3. Re:Junkies by Some_Llama · · Score: 3, Informative

      DEA has been cracking down on doctors prescribing drugs for the past 5 years, making it harder to get any kind of pain relief drug from your doctor, in both quantity and quality so that you end up suffering so your doctor doesn't go to jail.

      I know this from personal experience but here is a simple google search that took 5 seconds.

      https://www.google.com/#q=dea+...

  5. Ouch by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scientists from University College London seem to have come up with a two-pronged treatment regiment

    Two-pronged? Sounds painful. Couldn't they have made it one-pronged, or, like, two-nubbed or something?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  6. Too late for some. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever watch a Cancer patient die?
    I have. I listened to her cry, and whimper, and finally scream until she had to be sedated into unconsciousness with morphine and I mean a LOT of it.
    If this just DELAYS that final dosing, it would add weeks or months of enjoyable life to those who are dying of such agony.
    Patented? GOOD! Maybe this time the patent rights will be granted to competing entities, allowing for some competition.
    Since these are British researchers, we can so hope, they aren't quite as corrupted as our government funded research.

    1. Re:Too late for some. by PvtVoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever watch a Cancer patient die?
      I have. I listened to her cry, and whimper, and finally scream until she had to be sedated into unconsciousness with morphine and I mean a LOT of it.

      I'm sorry you had to go through this, truly. It sounds like she needed to be given opiates much sooner than she was. There is no reason at all for anybody to go through that kind of suffering, except for the tooth-and-nails resistance of oncologists to get people into hospice before they start suffering like this.

      Anybody with aging parents or an ill family member needs to educate themselves about hospice, and advocate fiercely for their loved ones.

    2. Re:Too late for some. by Wycliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever watch a Cancer patient die?
      I have. I listened to her cry, and whimper, and finally scream until she had to be sedated into unconsciousness with morphine and I mean a LOT of it.

      I'm sorry you had to go through this, truly. It sounds like she needed to be given opiates much sooner than she was. There is no reason at all for anybody to go through that kind of suffering, except for the tooth-and-nails resistance of oncologists to get people into hospice before they start suffering like this.

      Anybody with aging parents or an ill family member needs to educate themselves about hospice, and advocate fiercely for their loved ones.

      I had a relative watch a friend die. They increased the drugs to the "maximum legal limit" and even tilted the bed to make it harder to breath so that the friend would die quicker. They then had to sit there and watch and keep hoping that each breath was their last. How is this and doing things like removing the feeding tube and letting someone starve to death "standard procedure"? It's cruel and unusual punishment. Even our criminals are treated better.

    3. Re:Too late for some. by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >no reason at all ... except for the tooth-and-nails resistance of oncologists to get people into hospice

      It's not just that, it's a perverse Calvinistic view of chronic pain in general that one should just 'deal with it.'

      Never mind the fact that such pain has other clinical effects, like elevated blood pressure, depression, etc.

      The hostility that too many doctors have to analgesics is maddening. Over the past couple of years, it's gotten worse. Considering what's been going on with the latest moral panic over opioids/opiates and shenanigans like what's gone on over at the CDC about this, people are suffering and dying (sometimes because of suicide) needlessly.

      When the CDC gets piled on by a bunch of other agencies (FDA, HHS, etc.,) for fucking this up, something is rotten in Denmark.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Too late for some. by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      Maybe this time the patent rights will be granted to competing entities, allowing for some competition. Since these are British researchers, we can so hope, they aren't quite as corrupted as our government funded research.

      I'm not sure what this means - what is (somewhat euphemistically) termed "technology transfer" is standard practice in the UK just as in the US, although the actual laws are different of course. I've been in competition (some friendly, some not) with academically-based-or-derived groups based in Britain in multiple jobs over the last decade, and their licensing practices don't appear to be significantly different from a non-expert viewpoint (IANAL but I am a scientist, of sorts). I have yet to see any evidence that British researchers are any less "corrupt" than Americans either; they both are responding naturally to entirely legal financial incentives put in place by their governments and universities. Got a problem with it, change the law.

      As far as competition is concerned, I'm pretty certain that two companies paying for non-exclusive licenses would bring in far less revenue for the inventors than one company buying an exclusive license.

    5. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to hear about your experience. When my mom's cancer was terminal we got home hospice care and I helped my dad administer morphine when she--relatively peacefully--died. That said, where on earth do you get this: "Since these are British researchers, we can so hope, they aren't quite as corrupted as our government funded research"? What this group of British researchers is doing is the same thing as what goes on in the USA. We have a massively overburdened granting system with insane levels of merit-based competition to get a threadbare budget for a couple or three years. If you as a government-funded researcher win a patent, you sign all rights away to the university/parent research organization. That parent organization gets the majority of the income generated from the patent licenses, your lab then gets a small cut. You can then use that small cut to pay staff salaries and replace broken equipment. After that you might get a cut of the patent income, a couple percent to divide among the researchers who authored the patent.

      The corruption that we have in the USA is in the Kafkaesque manner in which we pay for health care. We can't negotiate drug prices because of socialism for the corporations while at the same time we are forced to go through insurance middlemen who have the job of charging the maximum amount for the barest minimum of care in the finest traditions of capitalism. This is of course in addition to a billing system so complex literally no one understands it. The Brits like the rest of the non-insane industrialized world have a form of single-payer socialized medicine that negotiates drug prices instead.

    6. Re:Too late for some. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm not a medical doctor, but I didn't think there was a "legal limit" on painkillers. There are lethal doses, and standards of care, but it's not like there's a crime on the books for 1mg more than some arbitrary limit. Perhaps the doctor was lying to you to pass off the reason for why they didn't give more. At some point it doesn't improve the standard of living of the patient.

    7. Re:Too late for some. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      It's because we don't have people becoming doctors to help people. they are there to be wealthy.

      Remember the old small town doctor that drive a rusted out chevy and helped poor people for free and even make house calls? Yeah those don't exist anymore. My doc was that kind and he recently died.

      He told me that the government would put him in jail for giving free care or making house calls. I guess charging less than the mandated minimum is a felony in the United States.

      Honest doctors help those in need. Dishonest ones drive a porsche and gold of fridays.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you so, SO MUCH for pointing out that this has roots in Calvinism! The most sociopathic fucking religion I've ever come across, and I study them. This perverted influence is at the root of a lot of this nation's troubles if you ask me...

    9. Re:Too late for some. by fafalone · · Score: 2

      Imagine seeing someone die of cancer, and their wife flushing any pain medication he got because "junkies will break in to steal it!". I lost my uncle to cancer, and my aunt to 'can't be the same room as such a despicable person'.

    10. Re:Too late for some. by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The legal limit is "dont kill the patient". Unfortunately the realities of terminal illness is that people can be in such harrowing agony the only rational thing to do is to help the patient pass away so doctors will often quietly administer a dose that will probably kill the patient reasoning that its the only dose that will contain the suffering and if the patient dies, well such is terminal illness.

      This puts doctors in a horrible situation legally. We accept without question that it is humane to euthenise pets whos suffering is more than they can deal with. Yet we cant allow our own species to take a dignified exit when they, and the doctor, agree that hope is lost.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    11. Re:Too late for some. by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's more complicated than that. At some point, the dose that controls the pain is the same as the lethal dose. The Nav1.7 blocker allows a much lower dose of opiates to totally block pain without the sedation or suppressing breathing.

    12. Re:Too late for some. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Someone on opiates for long term build up a tolerance that diminishes the effect, but the tolerance also increases the LD50. This is why so many people OD. They take half the dose of the addict that's showing them how, and that's quite lethal. Or, the long-term addict who was locked up in prison or rehab gets clean enough that their old maintenance dose is quite lethal. This is also why the concept of a maximum legal dose would be silly, as it would vary from person to person.

      A good suicide method would be to give a reasonable dose, then let the patient self-administer in 1mg doses. Someone tolerant enough of it to keep dosing themselves deserves the right to keep administering, if they so choose.

    13. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patented? GOOD! Maybe this time the patent rights will be granted to competing entities, allowing for some competition.
      Since these are British researchers, we can so hope, they aren't quite as corrupted as our government funded research.

      Sorry, but patents works just as well in the rest of the world as it works in the US.

    14. Re: Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fwiw making housecalls or giving free car is not illegal in the US. The problem he probably had with it is malpractice insurance wont cover most home visits or medical care delivered w/o charting. If he/she were to *lie* about where the care was delivered then the govt licensing board would have his hide.

      This isn't much different than the reason why girl scout cookies must be cooked in a commercial kitchen. Not some big conspiracy, but a side effect of nanny statism.

    15. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry but patents exist to extract rents billions and billions of excess rents, exclusive rent, no competition rent.

    16. Re:Too late for some. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Ever watch a Cancer patient die?

      Yes, unfortunately I can empathize with you. It was brain cancer. It was so fucked. The persons family believed in quacks and thought doctors, with years of experience, decades of research and 10's of millions of dollars worth of equipment, "didn't know shit" and didn't even let them try. Their answer to brain cancer was a plywood box around her head filled with rare earth magnets. It was the closest thing I'd seen to torturing a person, I didn't know a person head could swell so much.

      She couldn't speak so I talked to her and let her answer by squeezing my hand. To this day I regret *not* asking her 'do you want me to get you out of here and see a real doctor, squeeze twice for no and once for yes'. Unfortunately, I wasn't her direct family, so my hands were tied.

      Ignorance really causes a lot of suffering.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    17. Re:Too late for some. by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      Even our criminals are treated better.

      It's such a rare and insightful perspective. Criminals can be executed instead of suffering their guilt while incarcerated for their entire life. Meanwhile whole families are sentenced to watching a loved one suffer, be humiliated and eventually die in the most horrible ways when they have already chosen to die. It's a fucked up society that will take a life but will allow someone who is perfectly innocent to suffer for a long time before an inevitable, un-revocable, death penalty.

      People who haven't suffered adversity probably don't understand.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    18. Re:Too late for some. by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A good suicide method would be to give a reasonable dose, then let the patient self-administer in 1mg doses. Someone tolerant enough of it to keep dosing themselves deserves the right to keep administering, if they so choose.

      That might work for someone who has a fully functional brain and is capable of movement but many times for the terminally ill at the very end, that's not the case. They might be brain dead, paralysed, non-responsive, mentally incompetent or one or more other reasons that they can't self-administer. Most people who would be aware enough and physically able enough to self-administer wouldn't actually want to commit suicide. I think the more common case are the people who can't self-administer or even express their wishes who are left to suffer.

    19. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody have knowledge of cannabis(THC) in chronic pain management?
      Only asking because it is in the news fairly often.

    20. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not always their hostility toward it, its due to the feds breathing down their necks and threatening to pull their license ( or freedom ) every time they even think of prescribing something.

      You can thank the 'war on drugs' for this.

    21. Re:Too late for some. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Anybody with aging parents or an ill family member needs to educate themselves about hospice, and advocate fiercely for their loved ones.

      Or, more realistically, help those relatives acquire a guaranteed-lethal dose of heroine from black markets. Or, since this is an American site, a gun. Death is a tough enough thing to face without having to be at the mercy of random strangers and various twisted agendas, too.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    22. Re:Too late for some. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      True. I always thought that Hobbs had a better outlook and philosophy.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    23. Re:Too late for some. by tempmpi · · Score: 2

      The legal limit is "dont kill the patient".

      Maybe in the US. At least here in Germany it is legal to administer doses of morphine or other pain killers that might kill the patient as a side-effect, if these high doses are required to control the pain. However, doctors from hospices usually dispute the view that a proper dosing of morphine will hasten death. If you would administer the doses used in hospices to someone unused to opioids, they would kill, but we are talking about people that have usually received high doses of opioids for long time.
      The real issue is often that doctors are afraid of killing the patient by raising the dose and people being in pain because of that, even through raising the dose would not really kill the patient.

      --
      Jan
    24. Re:Too late for some. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "except for the tooth-and-nails resistance of oncologists to get people into hospice before they start suffering like this."

      I don't believe oncologists control entry to hospice. I've lost two family members in the last three years to cancer. Each had to wait because of a lack of available facilities.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    25. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Remember the old small town doctor that drive a rusted out chevy and helped poor people for free and even make house calls?"

      No, because they didn't exist.

    26. Re:Too late for some. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You are sorry, because you don't understand that patents aren't all owned by megacorporations. My dad had (he passed away) several that kept the auto industry from stealing his designs and giving them to cheaper competitors. It didn't make him rich, but it kept his small business from folding.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    27. Re:Too late for some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a medical doctor, but I didn't think there was a "legal limit" on painkillers. There are lethal doses, and standards of care, but it's not like there's a crime on the books for 1mg more than some arbitrary limit. Perhaps the doctor was lying to you to pass off the reason for why they didn't give more. At some point it doesn't improve the standard of living of the patient.

      In the 90's they used to think that too much morphine would kill you outright, no matter what. Now they've realized that the human body has no real limit on opioids. It's all about tolerance. If you give someone more than they can tolerate, they will stop breathing and die. There is absolutely no reason to let someone suffer through the pain.

      The real reason they suffer through the pain is the DEA. I've been in pain management for about 8 years now due to a bad injury sustained in an accident. I used to take a lot of opiods but my doctors have found a treatment program that kills the pain w/o the need for much medication (nerve ablation). However, my injury is degenerative. It will eventually get to the point where I can't work anymore. Anyway, to see my pain management specialist I have to get a drug test monthly, even without any opoids. Why? Because the DEA throws these doctors in jail if they feel like they are overprescribing. So my doctor does everything he can to CYA. Every patient gets drug tested every time they come in for treatment. If you test positive for anything except low quantities of THC, you're out. All so that if the DEA comes knocking on his door he has a get out of jail card. My health insurance covers the testing 100% but my understanding is the lab hits medicare for $600 per test. Most of my doctor's patients are on disability so the DEA is costing medicare a fortune.

    28. Re:Too late for some. by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Even our criminals are treated better

      Not sure about that - apparently the lethal injections ensures that the last moments of the condemned is likely to be absolute hell. But we DO treat animals better - at least if they are cute and cuddly and not destined for the abattoir.

    29. Re:Too late for some. by Maritz · · Score: 1

      This puts doctors in a horrible situation legally. We accept without question that it is humane to euthenise pets whos suffering is more than they can deal with. Yet we cant allow our own species to take a dignified exit when they, and the doctor, agree that hope is lost.

      Very true. The irony of that stance has struck me more than once before.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    30. Re:Too late for some. by K10W · · Score: 1

      I'm not a medical doctor, but I didn't think there was a "legal limit" on painkillers. There are lethal doses, and standards of care, but it's not like there's a crime on the books for 1mg more than some arbitrary limit. Perhaps the doctor was lying to you to pass off the reason for why they didn't give more. At some point it doesn't improve the standard of living of the patient.

      They can't give so much as to supress the breathing centre as pulmonary depression from such a dose would go into euthanasia territory so no the doc wasn't lying; you'd lose licence or worse for doing that before the final moments which can be weeks (or more) away in many cases.

      You'd be surprised how ineffective at managing pain opiates are in terminal phase of cancer and the like. They tend to dull some of it not make it painless and "kill" it despite what people think in those cases. It just makes agony a bit easier to cope with and tat those levels of pain it goes from extreme can't cope level to not so extreme can't cope level. Early stages I notice a few get relief from the usual, likes of oramorph (morphine sulphate in dropper bottle) and fentanyl lollipops and transdermal patches but they do nowt at that stage I notice, even seen friends dad suffering through heavy dose on diamorphine (heroin) which is common in the UK and know many who seen family members suffer through it still. F****king inhumane imho and chemically induced coma and death should be legal in those cases if recovery chance is nil "with" quality of life intact. So something actually making it painless would be a incredible!

    31. Re:Too late for some. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that happened to your friend.
      Maybe now this pain filled nightmare is at an end.

    32. Re:Too late for some. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Bingo
      DEA limits had her oxycodone curtailed and limited her fentenyl patches to 1/2 what her oncologist demanded.
      In the end, the pharmacist was more afraid of the Nixon Behemoth than he was of making a woman scream in pain.

    33. Re:Too late for some. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      I agree, non exclusivity means competition means lower prices....thus serving best the public good (required in corporate charters).
      It saddens me to hear that once again, breakthrough science, usually paid out of the public wheal, will be used to maximize profits while people die...again.

    34. Re:Too late for some. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      OMFUG, that is SICK.
      It might be correct, but it is STILL sick!

    35. Re:Too late for some. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      She was, but only at the DEA approved, far too low rate. Once her oncologist stepped in and had her dosages raised, she either slept or woke up on agony for the last three weeks.

  7. regiment?? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
    Regime, I think you meant.

    Editors? We don't need no stinking editors!

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:regiment?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Regime, I think you meant.

      Editors? We don't need no stinking editors!

      I believe what you mean is regimen.

    2. Re:regiment?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up. ;)

  8. You may like to read: by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You may like to read:

    Gunmen Kill 12, Wound 7 At French Magazine HQ
    10 Confirmed Dead In Shooting at Oregon's Umpqua Community College

    Jeez. If you're going to give me recommendations, could you at least not recommend stories that are two months to a year old?

    Next up: Japanese Cities Destroyed by Nuclear Bombs

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:You may like to read: by desperados · · Score: 1

      or yet better: technology related

    2. Re:You may like to read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guns are non-technological?

    3. Re:You may like to read: by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      The gun has been around in various forms since the 14th Century. It's not exactly cutting edge at this point.

      And if we must have articles about guns, how about on how they work, as opposed to click bait current events stories about mass shootings that appeared *the day before* on CNN.com.

    4. Re:You may like to read: by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I would LOVE a nice article on the inner working of the new smart weapons that are being developed. Problems is no "nerds" work for Slashdot anymore.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:You may like to read: by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      Next up: Japanese Cities Destroyed by Nuclear Bombs

      Repost!

      But seriously. Maybe I've been playing too much Fallout, but now is the time to prepare. As Phoenix666 suggested, we should mostly be preparing to seal the Illuminati's luxury vaults with cement.

      Then perhaps we can engage in a summit to discuss the shortcomings of the last Constitution (we did it before when the Articles of Confederation weren't good enough) and how to prevent this madness while honoring liberty.

  9. ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is going to upset all of the sadists and masochists out there.

    On the other hand, I'm sure everyone in the militaries (every country) will have a lifetime prescription for this.

  10. Cure for symptoms by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    We've got a cure for pain, a cure for fever (aspirin, Ibuprofin), now all we need is a cure for tiredness.

    Once we have that, doctors will have a prescription cocktail of 3 medicines that will cure almost anything!

    (Your symptoms went away - what's the problem?)

    1. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coffee does it for me...

    2. Re:Cure for symptoms by gnupun · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Pain is a warning that something is wrong and is harming you. You don't want the warning to go away... you want the problem that's causing the warning to be solved.

    3. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no cure for entropy though :(

    4. Re:Cure for symptoms by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, you want to have the pain until you have pinpointed the problem. Then you can turn off the alarm.

      So yes, people need to be very careful about using a "cure" for pain. People who don't feel pain can end up with much more serious damage to themselves from otherwise mundane causes than people who do feel pain.

      Ever burn yourself on a stove and yank your hand back? Someone who doesn't feel pain would probably not notice until they figured out that the burning smell was their own charred flesh.

    5. Re:Cure for symptoms by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pain is a warning that something is wrong and is harming you. You don't want the warning to go away... you want the problem that's causing the warning to be solved.

      That's not really what chronic pain is, though. Yes, pain is a warning, and an important one for most situations. When the system designed to regulate and deliver pain is broken, though, you get chronic pain. You feel pain regardless of whether or not there's actual harm being done. It's like trying to live in a house where the fire alarm is always going off.

      My wife has PMPS. When her surgery was performed, a number of nerve endings deep in her chest cavity were damaged; they can't grow back, and they're constantly firing alarms at every slightest thing. For her, riding in a car hurts when the car goes over a small bump in the road. Coughing or sneezing hurts like hell. Getting hugged to hard or run into too quickly by our 6-year-old daughter hurts. Don't even think of trying to pick that kid up, either, because that'll hurt, too. My wife's low-impact elliptical workouts are an exercise in constant nerve pain, but she does them anyway to keep up her health. Pulling on a locked door handle expecting it to be open hurts. Trying to grab a pan off the top shelf hurts. Lying on her back hurts. Rolling over in bed hurts. She's lucky to get four hours of sleep on a typical day, thanks to a vicious combination of anti-cancer meds and pain. Countless little, insignificant, pedestrian things that most people wouldn't even bat an eyelid at are constant and grinding sources of pain for her.

      She knows what the problem is; she's got busted nerves in her chest. You can't really fix busted nerves. Yes, there are risks to not feeling pain, but holy hell we'd take them in a heartbeat just to be able to shut this goddamned internal fire alarm off, even for a day.

      There are millions of people dealing with the same kind of thing: constant, chronic pain. This would very literally change their lives.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    6. Re:Cure for symptoms by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I suffer from chronic pain. I use painkillers to dull it, but it never goes away. Sometimes it is useful, telling me that something I'd wrong, but most of the time it's just meaningless suffering without end.

      What I need is something to turn off the meaningless chronic part, but leave the acute pain there so I realise when I am damaged or unwell.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Cure for symptoms by parenthephobia · · Score: 1

      People who can't feel pain aren't necessarily insensitive to temperature, or other pain-associated senses like pressure. This depends upon what neural pathways are effected by whatever disorder the person has.

      Some people won't reflexively snatch their hand away, because it doesn't hurt, but will still be aware that their hand is "too hot", based on previous experience of how hot their hand can safely be.

      Aside: People insensitive to pain and temperature often die of fever at a young age because their body doesn't know to sweat.

    8. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been disabled in chronic pain for my whole life due to a genetic condition. It's gotten much worse over the past 8 years especially.

      I'm allergic to opiates in any does that could help me.

      Thank you, but my alarm can be turned off any time they want to prescribe me that.

    9. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ultimately anything that is not immediately obvious to the doctor in the 15 minutes he/ she /it has to evaluate you becomes labeled idiopathic conversion disorder, and you get a bill for $300-$3000. Eventually you will die and the idiopathic disorders will go away along with the pain. Modern Medicine will have cured another patient of the twin intertwined diseases of pain and life.

    10. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pain is a warning that something is wrong and is harming you.

      Your body isn't the ultimate source of truth on everything, and it doesn't always do exactly the right thing. Evolution only gets us so far. The body sometimes makes mistakes and thinks something is harming it when it isn't at all. Allergies are a good example of this. The immune system over-reacts to pollen and thinks it's a disease and fights it like one. That's the sneezing, runny nose, etc associated with allergies. So we invent allergy medication to block the histamine. Sure, it's be better if we could train the immune system to stop attacking the damn pollen, but we don't know how to do that.

      The same is true with a lot of pain. It's the body over-reacting to something. Often times it's just inflammation, and there's no good reason for it. So we invented anti-flamatories,

    11. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never take advice from a stranger on the web, even if this stranger is me, someone who works as a chronic pain physician.

      There are doctors specialized in chronic pain conditions.
      First things coming into my mind are.

      TENS
      Amitriptyline/duloxetine
      Pregabalin/Gabapentin
      Capsaicine
      weak opioids, like tramadol

      Like you said, something truly useful for chronic pain would change the lives of millions. No one knows what it is like to have this condition, till it happens to one him/her self

    12. Re:Cure for symptoms by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      People who can't feel pain aren't necessarily insensitive to temperature

      No, but you feel the pain long before you feel the temperature when you burn yourself on a hot object (fire varies, depending on the flame) and all the temperature is going to do is tell you why you're smelling an odor of BBQ.

      My concern runs along these lines: We're finding that painkillers actually dull people's ability to feel emotion, not just pain...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pain is a warning that something is wrong and is harming you. You don't want the warning to go away... you want the problem that's causing the warning to be solved.

      Not exactly. Pain is one of the methods the body has to detect a problem. The problem is that just as with everything else in the body there is a possibility for both false positives and false negatives.
      This "cure" us can give a treatment in those cases where we have a false positive and thus experience pain without there being an underlying cause.

    14. Re:Cure for symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If coffee continues to work then you're not seriously tired.
      Not that I recommend it, but in the past I've had reason to stay up for 3 days straight with zero sleep. At that point coffee. does. nothing.
      I'm told there are drugs that do but there's no way in hell I'd be toying with them.

    15. Re:Cure for symptoms by RandomFactor · · Score: 4, Interesting
      http://sorrentotherapeutics.co...

      resinoferatoxin is considered ~1000x 'hotter' than pure capsaicin and is being developed for permanent pain relief uses in cases such as end-stage cancer.

      It operates by causing the pain receptors to fire continuously until they die and you don't want to be awake for that, so sedation is required. Since it is targeted in nature, it may be applicable in the GP's wife's case where the issue is with specific nerves.

      [The] higher potency combined with the specific targeting of TRPV-1 allows for selective destruction of the pain-triggering nerves, potentially producing a long lasting and permanent reduction in pain after a single injection.

      I stumbled across it a while back for unrelated reasons (I enjoy eating quite spicy foods and they love comparing it with peppers) it is being developed to provide relief for chronic pain.

      Obviously any interested should check with their doctor, or the company developing this for options. I have no idea if it will work in any given situation or not, or when it might be available, and am not a doctor..

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    16. Re:Cure for symptoms by bongey · · Score: 1

      I will take it awake. I was awake when I had my ilioinguinal nerve segmented and another nerve removed. "Hey doc your pulling on something that is my testicle can you please stop."

    17. Re:Cure for symptoms by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I suffer from chronic pain. I use painkillers to dull it, but it never goes away. Sometimes it is useful, telling me that something I'd wrong, but most of the time it's just meaningless suffering without end.

      After years of competition martial arts and sports like hockey, football and soccer I snapped an achilles tendon, the injury was so bad that a secondary injury was a snapped cruciate ligament in my knee. I went through about a litre of morphine (the bottle was attached to a clicker), so much that I said I couldn't deal with it any more. After it wore off, they didn't ask me if I wanted it, they just jabbed me. The pain was so extreme that after surgery the doctor explained that my legs had been in severe pain for so long that *every* sensation translated to pain.

      6 casts/months later they demonstrated by dragging a silk cloth over my leg which felt like a flamethrower had been applied to it. My leg was crimson purple and after the foreplay was over I spent the next 2 years learning to walk again, the physiotherapy was an exercise in agony and even the weight of a sheet on my legs was more pain than anything else.

      Many doctors visits later I was diagnosed with chronic reoccurring pain syndrome and depression, I'd used all my savings, I was 100kg plus from 84kg whilst fit and I couldn't drive a car more than 20 minutes without the pain shutting me down. I either stopped or fainted, it was that simple. I couldn't work so I started training weights and stretching to try to help myself. Unfortunately there was a lot more going on for me and the injuries weren't my most major concern. I couldn't reason with the pain and thoughts of the best way to end myself started to appear in my head like an impulsive little idea. When I realized what was happening I knew I had to find a way to fix it.

      What I need is something to turn off the meaningless chronic part, but leave the acute pain there so I realise when I am damaged or unwell.

      After seven or so years I found a way out (I'm still working at it, but the end is in sight). With all sincerity I want to share it because I wouldn't want anybody to suffer the way I did. I'm hoping this helps people overcome anything similar to what I suffered. Chronic pain takes everything from you.

      I started recording data about my body to try to understand what the pain was. I thought my geek could save me, and it did, the body is, I reasoned, just a complex machine. Fortunately martial arts training helps you channel pain so for brief periods of time I could be an *observer* of my own pain. By combining the two I was able to gain insight into how the pain worked.

      I discovered that because we have short memories we don't remember all the injuries we accumulate. For context, I had also suffered three neck injuries where I was concussed enough to require medical assistance, the AC joint in my right shoulder was torn, my right elbow hyper extended, left wrist was broken, left elbow didn't have full range of motion, I was also crushed around my torso by an old set of lift doors and fully rolled my left ankle, my rib cage folded over itself. This was on top of the conditioning where I would absorb full force kicks or punches to my legs arms and body. I was not your normal geek, if there is such a thing.

      However I overcame the pain from injury, it was possible - I hope this helps you, anyone.

      I found that the cavitation of joints is a key sign of how good a physio session was so I started to measure that. That cracking of your fingers happens in every joint in my body.

      So I devised a method to take a metric of that and started to record the frequency and type of cavitation. Slowly, the connection to the old injuries became apparent and what I thought was one signal from everywhere, was actually several different signals. My brain was just overloaded with processing pain from so many places.

      Scar tissue, also happens *in* your muscles, like a scab. Like a scab that

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    18. Re:Cure for symptoms by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Cure for symptoms by jittles · · Score: 1

      I had my cheekbone broken and my infraorbital nerve entrapped in the bone for a year. It took three years for that nerve to stop reporting the gentle breeze as burning hot pain. I sympathize with your wife and hope that some day the nerve returns to a more restive state.

    20. Re:Cure for symptoms by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Lack of pain can be fatal.

      The disease Leprosy does not cause all of those terrible symptoms, directly. It only kills the pain nerves. All of the missing fingers and toes, and worse, are dure to the lack of pain and the occaisional mistakes it causes.

  11. See you in 20 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Availability from your local physician with the inclusion to the covered treatments: no sooner that 2035, April, the first.

  12. how excellent! a patent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > we have now filed a patent for combining low dose opioids with Nav1.7 blockers

    A patent! How super excellent. Now I'm sure these will never cost any more than $10,000 per dose.

    The world will be so much better with yet another drug patent shooting the price of drugs into the sky where nobody can afford them.

  13. Sign zee papers, old man... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    The torturers will love this. Make people feel double the pain...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  14. Being immune to pain is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (setting aside the pain issues related to chronic illness)

    Personal injury such as laceration, infection, and burns are a common issue for people who don't know they're injured. Pain is how the body tells you something it wrong. It shouldn't be a switch to flip on and off because your boss wants you to work a double shift. Then accidents happen.

  15. Modafinil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cute for tiredness is only a schedule IV drug https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modafinil

  16. There's been a cure for thousands of years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called alcohol. The more you drink the more your pain goes away.

  17. Fish and pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad always told me that fish couldn't feel pain because they are cold blooded. I hated seeing the fish hook through their lip, or worse, down their throat. He'd rip the fish hook out of their throat causing them to bleed. I've even seen him filet a fish before it was fully dead (heart still beating, still flapping once and a while). I think if a fish can feel anything, like touch, then it can also feel pain. Years ago I saw an article about some scientists who tried putting a spicy hot paste on a fish's lips. The fish kept opening and closing it's mouth in a way that seemed like it was disturbed and possibly in pain.

    Now that scientists know how pain works, I'd like to know if fish really do feel pain. Get on it!

    1. Re:Fish and pain by rbrander · · Score: 1

      There is no way in hell you'd assume a vitally important feedback mechanism like pain was absent from any living organism that could benefit from it, unless you were trying to convince yourself you weren't being cruel. Furcrissake bash their brains the instant you can.

  18. Uber Soldat When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soldiers not feeling pain... is that the future?

  19. 110 million people with chronic pain ... by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    in just the US. It is a major symptom that goes along mostly with about 120 million people with chronic illness. About half the adults in the US have a chronic illness.

    Painkillers (NSAIDs & Aspirin) can often cause other problems, like gastrointestinal bleeding. Hence, if a new regime to control pain actually works, it might solve a number of issues in treatment of chronic illness. But it is not going to eliminate the chronic illness. In other words, stay healthy.

  20. The world is crying out for better pain killers by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's why this story is so cool.

    There's a good reason why doctors are hostile to analgesics. They can cause damage that lasts far longer than the acute pain, and can cause effects in the long term that are worse than the chronic pain, in many cases.

    For many cases of chronic pain, the relatively harmless stuff like NSAIDs, aspirin, and acetaminophen don't really work well enough, and in high doses all of these are toxic. So out come the opiates, however, opiates quickly induce tolerance so larger and larger doses are required. And the tolerance becomes addiction, and the brain starts getting re-wired. Not to mention the side effects of opiates, which aren't all that nice either.

    It can take *years* for a brain re-wired by long term use of opiates can return to "sort of" normal, if ever. And the return to normal has nasty psychological effects, such as depression, OCD-like symptoms, suicidal tendencies, and an inability to be happy or experience joy.

    It's much more than "moral panic" over opiates. The drugs are frankly dangerous, and even with the very best management practices, they will spin out of control if a person is on them too long.

    I'd only want to be on large amounts of opiates if I were terminally ill.

    1. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by fafalone · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a good reason why doctors are hostile to analgesics.

      They're scared of the DEA if they prescribe opiates in a way that offends the local field office.

      So out come the opiates, however, opiates quickly induce tolerance so larger and larger doses are required.

      So? Medical literature shows no additional side effects from even extreme doses (some non-terminal chronic pain sufferers even take 800+mg/day of oxycodone without issue)

      And the tolerance becomes addiction, and the brain starts getting re-wired.

      Despite the anecdotes, there's no medical evidence this happens anything more than a tiny minority of the time in patients who aren't already drug abusers. Dependence is not the same as addiction.

      Not to mention the side effects of opiates, which aren't all that nice either.

      Constipation, tiny bit of immune suppression rarely clinically significant, and...? Do you mean the effect of non-prescribed opiates due to prohibition rather than the substances themselves? People with tolerance to opiates aren't impaired and nodding out if they're being properly managed.

      It can take *years* for a brain re-wired by long term use of opiates can return to "sort of" normal, if ever.

      Among addicts with the medically distinct condition of addiction. As mentioned, a very small minority of those treated with opioids. And the statement should be more like a 1-3 months to 'sort of' normal, and 'if ever' for 'totally normal'.

      It's much more than "moral panic" over opiates. The drugs are frankly dangerous, and even with the very best management practices, they will spin out of control if a person is on them too long.

      It actually is moral panic. Medically speaking, opiates are far safer than the vast majority of prescription drugs. You sound like all your knowledge of opioid treatment comes exclusively from anti-drug propaganda sources. It sure as hell didn't come from the medical community.

      I'd only want to be on large amounts of opiates if I were terminally ill.

      Well you're into that whole drug war propaganda thing where you believe everyone prescribed some Vicodin for a toothache is shooting up heroin with dirty needles while homeless in an alley a few months later. So if you want to suffer, go for it. But respect the rights of others to not want to suffer because of opioid hysteria like you're spreading. And even if you want to go on believing that hysteria, I hope we can at least agree that the DEA shouldn't be setting treatment guidelines like it is now, and it should be left up to the patient and their doctor. (if you're getting massively overprescribed by a pill mill, it's a situation you've gone out of your way to get to)

    2. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If your choice was confinement to bed or opiates, I'll bet you would sooner of later risk the opiates if that was an option. Pain can get severe enough to blot out thought even in the absence of a terminal condition. The answer used to be risk the opiates and give them years of more of less normalcy. The answer now seems to be let 'em scream.

    3. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Excellent, well done,

      "(if you're getting massively overprescribed by a pill mill, it's a situation you've gone out of your way to get to)"

      except for that last sentence. As right you are elsewhere, your as wrong here.

    4. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > the relatively harmless stuff like NSAIDs

      Speaking as a victim of this meme, I have to say that this is one of the most dangerous memes out there.

      Ibuprofen, and such, kill your kidneys. I should know, my cardiologist tore me a new asshole when I told him how much OTC ibuprofen I was taking for my arm pain. I am sure that part of the kidney damage I have is because of that.

      4mg of hydromorphone would have been /much/ safer. And no, I wouldn't have gotten addicted, because I'm not the type of person who does so, because I've seen other people with addiction problems and I've learned the easy way by watching them learn the hard way.

      It's too bad I had to learn about NSAIDs the hard way myself.

      >they will spin out of control if a person is on them too long.

      Chronic pain sufferers aren't looking to get high. They just want to get out of the fetal position and get out of bed.

      My wife has one of those rare doctors who is actually knowledgeable about chronic pain. She is terrified of what will happen to her when he retires - she travels an hour across the state because in 7 years, she's yet to find a doctor locally who takes chronic pain seriously. And this moral panic is terrifying her even more, on top of that.

      If she is cut off from her legal and safe meds, which she has been responsively using for decades now, she will either kill herself (the plan is a helium 'exit bag' - we have soberly discussed this at length, and I am not OK with it.) /or/ she will turn to street heroin, truly a sub-optimal solution. This moral panic is killing people and making heroin addicts out of chronic pain sufferers because they turn to heroin when cold-turkeyed and locked out by ignorant-as-fuck doctors from legal and safe opiates and get thrown into the world of "I don't know how much this dose is because I got it from Shady-Joe."

      This moral panic is a pogrom against the ill. It needs to fucking stop right now.

      And yes, there are moneyed interests behind this moral panic. You can google this stuff yourself.

      Kurt Cobain is dead largely because of chronic pain and the cascade of effects it has. Chronic pain is not to be fucked with.

      In his journals, Kurt often mentioned that he was suffering from chronic stomach pain. He went to several doctors but they were unable to determine the cause. His condition worsened as time progressed which prompted Cobain to shoot up more and more heroin to alleviate the pain. In his suicide note, Kurt references his stomach problems:

      "Thank you all from the pit of my burning, nauseous stomach for your letters and concern during the past years."

      https://www.upvenue.com/articl...

      This war on drugs has been a fucking disaster.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by bmo · · Score: 1

      >responsively

      Argh.

      responsibly.

    6. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm a pharmacist. The goodly sum of the pill mill patients do not need what they are prescribed and sell it on the streets. Its funny when the pain docs finally get around to piss testing (also due to DEA pressure) we start getting letters and faxes about patients being discharged...because the prescribed meds WERE NOT FOUND in their system.

    7. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by swb · · Score: 2

      I had a serious accident that cost me half of my left ring finger and required fusing the distal joint on my middle finger. I was prescribed 40 mg oxycodone per day but after about two weeks it was just too much -- I was listless and in a fog, so I just dialed back the dosage to the point where the pain was manageable and I was much less foggy. I ended up on a daily dose of about 5 mg for three months and when they were gone, I never felt the need to take more.

      I don't know how typical my experience is, but I honestly expected that when the meds ran out I would feel some kind of withdrawal symptoms and/or some compulsion to keep taking them, but I mostly just forgot about them. My best guess is that the half life of oxycodone is short enough and the once a day dosage I was taking was low enough that I probably couldn't have developed an additction because I wasn't taking enough or with enough frequency to develop a physical addiction.

      I think I've also read that the psychoactive tolerance to opiates builds much faster than the angelsic response -- escalating dosages is a problem because people get less high and believe the pain relief is less, too, so they take higher dosages because they don't believe they're getting the right response. In fact, the analgesic response is still good, they just don't think so because they've gotten tolerant to the psychoactive response.

      I would think that the "opate problem" would be a lot less if we'd develop sound strategies on how to take them and educate patients versus just sending them away with pills. Personally I think that given how many people take opiates, the problems are way smaller than the hype would suggest (and more than a few people have a stake in the hype).

    8. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years to get over opiate addiction? Uhhh, no. Please. Former opiate addict here, took them for 7 years. It doesn't take years to get over opiates unless for some reason you want it to take years. Long term high dose benzo use MAYBE in some extreme cases, but opiates? No way.

      For most opiates that aren't methadone or suboxone, you'll be over the withdrawals in a few days to a week, the worst will be over in a few days. And the withdrawals are normally (unless you have some absurd tolerance or are on methadone) easily treatable to get you to 90% or so if you know what you are doing (just gotta be careful, the things that help can also be physically or mentally addictive)--i recommend low dose loperamide and benzos and some sort of dissociative drug, also low dose. You'll feel 90% if you do it right.

      Then you'll get PAWS which can last for weeks or a few months. But it's not going to last years. Get exercise and you'll feel better. If you feel miserable for years, there is some other problem going on--see a psychiatrist for sure.

    9. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've never used an addictive substance yourself you have no idea WTF you're talking about.

      Everyone with neurons is the type of person who get's addicted. The question is: do you have the discipline to do what you don't want to do even when you want to do the opposite more than anything else in the world?

      I've quit drinking alcohol and smoking cigarettes for 12+ months 5x or 6x times in my life.

      It's been over a year on the cigarettes and over 6 months for the alcohol.

      Despite this: I say there's a 50% chance I go back to smoking within the next 5 years and a 75% chance I go back to drinking within the next 3 years.

      I have scars on my body I gave myself as a reminder to stay clean. They feel like worthwhile sacrifices when I'm off the shit, and idiotic self-mutilation when I'm not.

      The only reason I'm clean right now is because the doctor lied to me and told me I couldn't mix alcohol with my mood stabilizers and I am actively choosing to believe the lie. I make a point to avoid asking the pharmacist about this just so I still have some shred of self-preservation keeping me away from the bottle.

      Despite the impact drugs have had on my life, I'm adamantly opposed to prohibition. I agree with you there, I simply resent your casual disrespect for addicts. We're all slaves to Dopemine and Serotonin, some of us are just in a very intense destructive relationship with them as well.

    10. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by ultranova · · Score: 1

      And no, I wouldn't have gotten addicted, because I'm not the type of person who does so, because I've seen other people with addiction problems and I've learned the easy way by watching them learn the hard way.

      If your brain chemistry is such that you're not prone to addiction, that's wonderful for you, but it has nothing to do with what type of person you are or what you've learned. I recommend against finding this out the hard way.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    11. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by bmo · · Score: 1

      I know myself and I know my body when it comes to this stuff, is what I meant.

      Yes, I "like" dilaudid far more than morphine (it's crap, really) when I get it administered to me in the ER.

      But that doesn't mean I will go off the rails when given a prescription for 4mg or even 8mg.

      It /is/ possible to deal with addictive substances sanely. It's why I can walk away from a beer that's half-empty and not feel bad that it's 'going to waste.'

      --
      BMO\

    12. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my cardiologist tore me a new asshole

      This is not the job of cardiologist. They should have sent you a proctologist for this operation.

    13. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, my brother died of complications of pancreatitis. He had chronic pain. They had only just upped his dose a week or so before that. I recall he also had bowel problems, which is a side affect of the pain meds. As best as we could figure out, the pain meds likely masked the pancreatitis initially. The hospital put him in a normal room initially on I think a very high dose of pain meds, because of the pancreatitis. He then somehow developed sepsis and then was in the ICU for weeks before the end.. They never did find the cause of the sepsis, though they also never ran an MRI because of his condition once he entered the ICU. They almost did once, but he got worse. I suspect he would have lived longer if he had not had his dose doubled. He could have easily been to a hospital sooner.

      It also concerns me that the pain meds allowed him to continue doing fairly harsh construction work for years longer than he probably should have after my father passed away. I think they caused the greater problems that required so much pain medicine during the end of his life and ultimately shortened his life.

      Did he need some form of pain medicine? Almost certainly, but calling them safe is something I will never do. Even if they don't kill you directly, they could certainly create conditions which will shorten your life.

    14. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by bmo · · Score: 1

      The type of person I am is 'not prone to addiction'

      I recommend that you not read too much into what other people say especially when I wasn't trying to say I'm better than you or other people who /are/ prone to addiction.

      KTHXBAI

      --
      BMO

    15. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      >You sound like all your knowledge of opioid treatment comes exclusively from anti-drug propaganda sources. It sure as hell didn't come from the medical community.

      Actually, the knowledge comes from my friend, who suffers from chronic pain, and who quit opiods cold turkey and now lives with the pain (though it's less now), the depression, and is recovering mentally slowly. He's been doing heavy research on the effects opiod use has on people, as he tries to find his way back to relative mental normalcy.

      He was on opiods for years and would withdraw peroidically so he could keep the dose he was taking small and still be effective. His pain doctors complimented him on how well he managed his opiod use. It still became problematic for him and now he's quit for good, and quitting has been a painful struggle for him.

      Believe it or not, I'm actually pro legalization for most drugs. I don't think the drug war has done much good or been successful.

      That said, opiods are dangerous, should be legal, and should be used where compassionately necessary, but it'd be WAY better if this new treatment would work instead. I'd rather see people not suffering from pain OR from the problems opiods can cause.

      > Well you're into that whole drug war propaganda thing where you believe everyone prescribed some Vicodin for a toothache is shooting up heroin with dirty needles while homeless in an alley a few months later.

      Actually, I was very careful what I said. I said "too long". I said "long term use". Opiods seem pretty OK for people who are using them for short term acute pain. It's chronic pain sufferers who are more at risk, and I really hope this new treatment works to completely kill their pain. I also hope it can replace standard opiod treatment for acute pain. It'd work better and it would be safer.

      As I said, the world is crying out for better painkillers.

      --PM

    16. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      I hope this new treatment works and then people who just want to be free of pain aren't at risk of becoming slaves to opiates.

      --PM

    17. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I am an opiate addict though I no longer use IV (very often) and am on Suboxone. I did first take opiates for the pain, they handed 'em out like candy back then. However, that's not why I stuck with it. I used them because I like the warm embrace. I like being able to sleep. I like not really caring a whole lot. The world is full of stupid people who say stupid things and I find it easier to deal with them when I'm high. Dealing with them was a requirement.

      I was a functional addict for years. I still am, really. Though I don't need to function as much. I shot up for years and years.

      I guess my point is that it's nice that it solves the pain problem but some of us used it for greater therapies than pain and just plain recreation. I know it bothers many people to let others do what they want but, even as an addict that's no longer using illegal drugs, I'm still a huge fan of legalization. Bad behavior is already criminalized and prohibition has caused more harm than good. (I believe we're in agreement there.)

      So, there's more than one use for opiates. It's not just about physical pain. Sometimes, it's just nice to be wrapped in a warm fuzzy blanket and not give a shit that the person you're talking to is borderline retarded and somehow managed to be either elected or appointed. (I did a lot of work for the government.)

      Oddly, most people think that posts must all be arguments. I'll add that this is not really an attempt to do so but rather to shed light on some additional usage patterns. I'm still on a monster dose of 32mg of Suboxone with an extra 16 available as needed. I was fond of extracting Fentanyl from the mylar patches and shooting that. To put that in perspective, Fentanyl is about the most potent thing meant to go into a human and is about 80 times more powerful than pure heroin/diacetylmorphine.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    18. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Well, to be honest, Dilaudid by IV is absolutely wonderful. Well it was, for a long time. I need something stronger as my tolerance is that of a monster and, today, it would't break through the Suboxone.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    19. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ibuprofen, and such, kill your kidneys.

      Ibuprofen and acetaminophen can do great damage to your liver and kidneys.

      Aspirin? No. That shit only wrecks your stomach. It's not clear to me if it is more damaging than any other NSAID, but AIUI, it's pretty clear that it does *not* damage your liver and kidneys.

    20. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Really? Opiates taken over a long time will make any human an addict? I must not be human then.

      I know a sample size of one does not negate a theory all its own. I suggest you do some more research on your claims since I know them to not be true.

      The dangers on opiates are wildly overblown. Humans have been using opiates for pain for hundreds or thousands of years. We know it works and we know how it works. We know how much is safe and how much is too much. Tylenol is far more dangerous than opiates, we have the body counts to prove it. I believe codeine should be over the counter and Tylenol should require a prescription based on recent evidence of over dose deaths alone.

      Just like how moonshine is a result of alcohol prohibition we now have heroin because of opiate prohibitions. People in the 1920s didn't want to drink the industrial alcohol that is moonshine, they wanted a glass of wine or a can of beer. Lacking access to that they'd mix m industrial alcohol with fruit juice. There are real people with real pain that don't want to take heroin, but lacking access to anything else to relieve their pain they will take it. Many of these people are desperate for proper medical care but because of bad policy people don't get it. This is a problem the government created, and people are dying because of it.

      People tell me that there is no medical use for heroin but that is false. Heroin is just the legal name for dimorphine that was not obtained from a physician. In the USA no physician can legally proscribe dimorphine, but they can prescribe the much more potent hydromorphone. This has nothing to do with any real medical practice or theory, only on government policy based on false assumptions.

      What many will agree to be the end of prohibitions on alcohol was when the government had added a new denaturing agent to industrial alcohol. Dozens of people died from this. We are seeing this again with the government adding Tylenol to opiates to keep people from taking too much. You see too much Tylenol will kill you. Too much of an opiate will usually knock you unconscious before it kills. Tylenol will destroy your liver if you take too much. I hear that death from liver damage is prolonged and painful as your body poisons itself over days.

      Government policy is such that they would rather you die a long and painful death than get high. We see this happen nearly daily in the USA but very few people seem outraged over this like I am. Perhaps this is by intent. People that live long happy lives with pain managed by opiates are a drain on government provided health care. Dead people only have a one time cost of burial.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    21. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      This is a common situation. People who are prescribed opiates for acute pain rarely get addicted.

      Personal anecdote - I was prescribed 16mg oxycodone after an oral surgery. I really disliked the side effects (nausea and woozy head) so I stopped taking it after several days.

      I kept the pills, though, since they are quite useful - a month or so ago I got a big shallow steam burn (from opening an oven door) and I know from experience that such burns are not threatening but a huge PITA as they cause a lot of discomfort. So I self-prescribed a 5mg a day of oxycodone for two days and was able to function without significant problems.

    22. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the return to normal has nasty psychological effects, such as depression, OCD-like symptoms, suicidal tendencies, and an inability to be happy or experience joy.

      That's not the return to normal, that's the effect of displacement therapy using drugs that act on the same systems but don't give the high (e.g. methadone). These effects are why you need to get off the methadone. And as fafalone says they only apply to addiction. One can take mild opiates (e.g. co-codamol) for years without getting physically addicted (although psychological addiction is not asymptomatic, it's also much easier to break).

    23. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever consider that you were the problem, and not the other people you perceived to be "stupid". The fact that you're unable to tolerate discussion from those you disagree with says much about you. I'm sorry you were in chronic pain, and glad you received drugs for it. The remainder of your commentary shows why these drugs need to be controlled.

    24. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're confused as to what "massively overprescribed" and "pill mill" actually mean. I assure you, the kind of place that will write you a bunch of extra scripts in relatives names (to avoid suspicious per-person prescribing) without doing examinations (because they see 15+ patients/hr) are NOT the kind of place you wind up in by accident. At a bare minimum, the 4 hour long line of 20- and 30- somethings who look perfectly healthy would clue you in, and normal people wouldn't want a doctor who doesn't examine or talk to them. Some would require, and some just pressured, using their affiliate pharmacies. The ones that required them, were typically all empty shelves with boxes of only painkillers and a couple others on the floor, cash only, with several armed guards.
      As for "massively overprescribed", it's much rarer to find a true pill mill doing this now, but a few years ago in FL you could walk in and get 150 80mg OxyContin's, 300 30mg instant-release oxycodone, 150 10mg instant release oxymorphone or 4- to 8- mg hydromorphone, on top of 90x2mg alprazolam (xanax) tablets, and even some Adderall or dexedrine (amphetamines) for the tiredness. This was a fairly typical pill mill visit, and was a 30-day supply. Some people take this much legitimately, but that's truly rare in 20- and 30- somethings.
      (and if you think this portrayal is inaccurate, you're definitely not familiar with pill mills and have confused them with normal pain management doctors; which to be fair is what the DEA and mass media have done.. lump in the actual criminal places with unfairly accused pain management practices).

    25. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone with a sensitivity to opiates and opiods, I'm glad for any research into alternatives. If it isn't crippling pain, I'm not interested in pain relief beyond an OTC solution.

    26. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I have considered that. I take it that you've never worked with managers from the public sector before? No, no... They're number than a twat full of Novocaine. The private sector isn't a whole lot better. As near as I can tell, they're both corrupt at similar levels. I'm not sure why people voted them in or who approved their hires.

      No sir, the number of times I've heard, "Well, I've got a friend who..." Lemme just tell ya, you don't want to hear that in a municipal setting and you sure as hell don't want to hear it in the private sector. It's slightly worse in the public arena because those are your tax dollars.

      You might think these people are smart, and a few of them are, but they're really not that smart. It's a damned shame, really. I've found the people working for a project manager are usually much smarter than the PM themselves. If they're elected officials? Oh, they must have (I'm assuming) some specific domain knowledge about something or other but damned if I can tell what it is.

      Just 'cause they're "your betters" doesn't mean they're all that bright. They might even have some pretty documents on the wall that indicate that they know what they're talking about. Well, I've got one of those too and I'm not even all that bright. If *I* am smarter than you then you've got problems, son. The thing is, so many of them are even dumber than that. We're talking dumb enough to the point where stringing two simple concepts together, clearly, and describing how they interacted didn't do a damned bit of good.

      No, they might be our betters but they sure as hell aren't all that bright. Hell, sit through a city council meeting some time. One might think a small town would be worse and one might be wrong. Alas, I was usually in larger areas or dealing with State governments and their highway departments. Sometimes, and worse, I'd have to deal both with marketing and operations. No sir, they're not that smart.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can take *years* for a brain re-wired by long term use of opiates can return to "sort of" normal, if ever.

      Among addicts with the medically distinct condition of addiction. As mentioned, a very small minority of those treated with opioids. And the statement should be more like a 1-3 months to 'sort of' normal, and 'if ever' for 'totally normal'.

      As someone who was on fentanyl for many years, the changes caused by physical dependency are real. When I found a treatment that blocked the pain, I asked my doctor come off my opoids. For many months, I regretted that decision. I had panic attacks, social anxiety, and difficulty sleeping for over 9 months. I lost a relationship, and just struggled to make it through life for a very long time. I wasn't sure I would make it. I spent a lot of time talking to a therapist trying to learn how to cope with my struggles. It was like no other challenge I have ever experienced. I had no craving for the drug, no longing to take it again. But my body did not know what to do without it. That being said, I am very sympathetic to those who legitimately have chronic pain. It's very tough for doctors. I still see a pain management specialist and I see people all the time that act like their dying the moment they walk into the doctor's office, but out in the parking lot are completely different people. My doctor doesn't turn anyone away, however. If they have been referred by another doctor and have a physical injury, he treats them. He makes everyone jump through a ton of hoops to avoid problems with the DEA, though.

    28. Re:The world is crying out for better pain killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a fool. Stay away from street heroin. Street fentanyl is the answer.

  21. Will never happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing that involves the administration of any amount of opioid peptides (and this does) will EVER replace NSAIDS in the United States.

  22. Maybe I mis-read the paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I understood the paper, what they've found is essentially a way to make anybody's body react to opioids as if they had less than zero tolerance ... so that very small doses can deliver very large effects.

    Medically that's awesome, but the DEA isn't going to see it as anything other increasing the potential for opioid abuse. IF they approve its use at all, they will regulate it like it's the strongest opioid on the books.

    1. Re:Maybe I mis-read the paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Medically that's awesome, but the DEA isn't going to see it as anything other increasing the potential for opioid abuse.

      Well you have to get your priorities straight don't you? First thing to ascertain with any new drug is whether it has the potential for anyone to have fun with it, and then ban it regardless of its other properties.

  23. Ah, the good old good ones by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    good old-fashioned opioid peptides

    I remember them well.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  24. Irony by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    quote: "They then gave naloxone to a 39-year-old woman with the rare mutation and she felt pain for the first time in her life."

    What a heartwarming story!

    Woman breaks her toe on a table leg. "AAAAH! Ngh. . . It's so. . . wonderful! Gaaah!" Cries tears of joy(?).

    OK, I understand that this is a serious medical condition, not to mention a breakthrough in our understanding of the subject. No disrespect. . . But I couldn't help noticing the irony and dark humor implicit in that one sentence.

    1. Re:Irony by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I would really like to hear more about this women's experience of feeling pain for the first time. How would she react to that? How long before she said that's great, now shut it off please.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  25. And Weltschmerz, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Scotch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good Scotch => Less Pain

  27. hypnosis for pain and more by swell · · Score: 2

    My introduction to hypnosis was having three teeth pulled after a five minute session. No drugs. One tooth had three roots wrapped around bone. For a week I spit out bits of broken bone, but no pain, no bleeding at any time.

    A skilled hypnotist can remove chronic pain in a single session. Even better, he/she can teach how you can do it yourself, if necessary for the rest of your life. Most people do well with hypnosis.

    There seems to be a lot of superstition and mystery concerning hypnosis among the ignorant, especially in the medical profession. It can't do all miracles but it does some very well. If you haven't looked closely in to it you are doing yourself and your loved ones a disservice. You'll never know the myriad ways it can benefit you.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re: hypnosis for pain and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a real thing, we understand why it works too. Seriously a little reading up is all it takes. The more advance though perfer mindfulness meditation, training your brain to accept pain, which again has been shown in peer review to be far more effective than any drug. The west seems to have this whole propaganda that the mind is a waste to bother with, that drugs are required and infinitely better than understand ones self.

    2. Re: hypnosis for pain and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Searched Google Scholar, and I still have the question -- do you have any scientific study of it in the last 30 years? There were some studies in the 1930s, though.

    3. Re: hypnosis for pain and more by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should learn to read before speaking out of your anus.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  28. Pain by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

    I'd post the whole zalgo thing if the site supported Unicode.

    Are you fucking serious. Causing more pain?! I've experienced plenty, to the point where I come back around to my original decision about a decade and a half ago that suicide is preferable to the pain of circumcision, at least what happened to me. I gather circumcisions generally go well. I'm just unlucky.

    (I am about to lose access to my meds, and "religious objection!" may prevent me from getting a replacement, as much as I want to cooperate with the system. How does one cooperate with a system that is designed to kill you by excruciating pain instead of the natural way? I will try.)

    Except, this time, I have these words of advice:

    Do not go gentle into that good night,
    Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
    Because their words had forked no lightning they
    Do not go gentle into that good night.

    Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
    Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
    And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
    Do not go gentle into that good night.

    Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
    Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    So here's how it is, Slashdot and Soylent. I went off on Soylent, but I guess I'm feeling green today. Dox me, geek feminism wiki. Call me a rapist. Blame me for the lack of female programmers. Just do it. Insert relevant image macro.

  29. we have filed for a patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting..

  30. What about pain that human stupidity causes me? by Chas · · Score: 1

    What about that?

    If you can kill, or at least scale back the pain that active, epic levels of idiocy cause me, I'd wholly fund the thing tomorrow.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  31. Flawed understanding... by bcware · · Score: 2

    I believe this "cure" for pain will fail, though it may be a more effective treatment than traditional opiates if it has fewer side effects. Why will it fail? Pain consists of TWO key elements. Element 1 is the physical stimulus or nerve conduction (this is actually the least important). Element 2 is the brain's emotional response to the stimuli it received. The brain is capable is experiencing pain even when no stimulus is received from a peripheral site. Phantom limb pain in amputees definitively proves this. The brain has a "map" of the body and is capable of experiencing pain even when a body part no longer exists. Therefore, anything that blocks nerve conduction (like a sodium channel blocker) will not stop pain in all patients. I'm not trying to say this new drug target will be useless; it might be fantastic, but it will not "cure" pain by any stretch of the imagination. I'm interested to see what kind of side effects are experienced when nav1.7 is blocked in HEALTHY patients.

  32. It's not that the doctors are hostile. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The hostility that too many doctors have to analgesics is maddening.

    It's not that the doctors are hostile to giving adequate doses of painkillers.

    It's that the DEA examines how often and how much they prescribe, and if it is too high (by their far too low scales) they come down on the doctors with penalties that are often career-ending. This puts doctors treating chronic-pain cases, or painful diseases, at substantial risk. So they underprescribe painkillers in order to avoid discovering the current administrative threshold by exceeding it.

    This is particularly appalling now that it has been discovered that adequate opioid painkiller dosage in the first weeks following a traumatic injury apparently prevents post traumatic stress disorder. Perhaps the high and rising incidence of this debilitating condition in the past decades was entirely the result of the drug war.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  33. Meanwhile in Australia and China, two years ago... by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    Discovery of a selective NaV1.7 inhibitor from centipede venom with analgesic efficacy exceeding morphine in rodent pain models http://www.pnas.org/content/11...

  34. Re:Meanwhile in Australia and China, two years ago by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    The substance in question is , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  35. Re: The world is crying out for better pain killer by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    I had tried alcohol and decided that I don't like it so I don't drink it at all. I used prescription opiates and I haven't got addicted to them. A half-finished bottle of oxycodone still stands on my shelf, I'll throw it away once it expires.

  36. Doug Stanhope and Mother by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    He has a fantastic bit about his mother's passing. He's not everyone's cup of tea, but this one is worth a listen.

  37. Re: The world is crying out for better pain killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn KG, your story mirrors mine almost exactly. I worked for EMC in the government sector. I was a solutions architect building out storage systems for the government. I used to snort the fentynol gel when I could get my hands on it. I started out with 40mg/day of OxyContin. Quickly rose to 240mg/day. That warm feeling just made me feel complete. It made me feel invincible, and the skies were the limit. It helped me ignore the stupid shit going on around me. Then addiction kicked in. I switched to snorting H to shooting H. I started heroin because the pills were to expensive and H was much cheaper(also more dangerous).

    I have been clean for 5 years now. Only drugs I use are my suboxone and marijuana. I can't believe you still have to take that much suboxone. I started with 16mg doses, dropped to 8mg doses, Now I am now down to 1mg a day. Sometimes I only take .5mg a day.

    On bad days if I get an urge, I'll take 4-6mg of suboxone and feel that warm feeling you referred to. Because I take such a low dose daily, the high doses now effect me more.

    I was also told that suboxone had a ceiling limit. After 8mg it hits a ceiling. The rest of the drug just never gets activated because it fills up all your receptors.

    I have been following you on /. for years now. I would love to correspond with you. Shoot me an email @ mawhite1983 (at) gmail.com. I would love to pick your brain and chat with you on various subjects. Sorry I am ac, I had an account back in 1999 but got addicted to drugs around 2001. That is when computers became secondary. Don't remember the email or password I used. I am a long time reader of /..

  38. How About Inability To Locate An Injury? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    I'm very glad this discovery is coming along, and hope it gets out on the market quickly (and at a reasonable price).

    I had the personal experience of knowing an individual who could feel pain well enough .. but couldn't identify from the pain where the injury was! He happened to be a Montagnard, Nott, the M-79 gunner on my recon team in Vietnam (long long ago) .. but I suppose that's neither here nor there. I saw him get injured several times and it was always the same thing. It usually took a couple of seconds; his expression would show pain and discomfort; and he'd start checking out his body to see what was hurt. Usually he couldn't pin it down until he found the bleeding part (first time I saw it), or found a joint wasn't working properly or would generate higher pain levels when used.

    He lived with it just fine, but I found it curious to say the least.

  39. Re: The world is crying out for better pain killer by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Email has been sent. (From email address associated with my profile.)

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  40. I shed a tear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They then gave naloxone to a 39-year-old woman with the rare mutation and she felt pain for the first time in her life."

    After 39 years she finally got to 'enjoy' anal sex.