Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Germany Fires Up Bizarre New Fusion Reactor (sciencemag.org)

Posted by timothy on from the that-dog's-not-that-radioactive dept.

New submitter insitus writes: On 10 December, Germany's new Wendelstein 7-X stellarator was fired up for the first time, rounding off a construction effort that took nearly 2 decades and cost €1 billion. Initially and for the first couple of months, the reactor will be filled with helium—an unreactive gas—so that operators can make sure that they can control and heat the gas effectively. At the end of January, experiments will begin with hydrogen in an effort to show that fusing hydrogen isotopes can be a viable source of clean and virtually limitless energy.

10 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. -- Stellarator-- by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Funny

    great Jazz Fusion band name.

    1. Re:-- Stellarator-- by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah. Metal bands should have a fission-related name.

  2. Wendelstein 7-X stellarator? by nwaack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this a story from Futurama?

    1. Re:Wendelstein 7-X stellarator? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is this a story from Futurama?

      Wendelstein 7-X Stellarator is a fully-owned subsidiary of MomCorp.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  3. Dup......ish by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Informative

    FTA: "This story was originally published online on 21 October and in the 23 October issue of Science. It has been updated with new information."

    And yes, this story was on Slashdot then.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  4. Re:So what's bizarre about it? by KGIII · · Score: 5, Funny

    This One Secret Trick Slashdot Uses to Increase Click-Through Rates!

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  5. hydrogen... by tapia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing says success like the juxtaposition of "Germany" and "technological innovation involving a hydrogen filled container".

    1. Re:hydrogen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nothing says success like the juxtaposition of "Germany" and "technological innovation involving a hydrogen filled container".

      Hydrogen didn't bring down Hindenburg. It was pilot error. Here is what most likely happened:

      Hindenburg was 12 hours late and would be even more late due to a thunderstorm. To prevent being so late that they had to delay the return trip too, the captain decided to go closer to the thunderstorm than normally allowed. On arrival, he decided to land even though the winds exceeded the limits for allowing landing. So far everything has been facts. The next is speculation based on circumstantial evidence and later tests.

      A gust of wind threw Hindenburg out of the landing approach and to counter that, full rudder was applied. This was not allowed during landing due to structural stress and a wire holding the shape of the "cigar" snapped and punctured a hydrogen container. The ship was statically charged from flying too close to the thunderstorm. As a guidewire touched the ground and the front of the ship at the same time, the front suddenly started burning, presumably started by a static discharge. Based on color descriptions of the fire, the fire started in the water protecting coat on the canvas. After that burned for a while, it reached the leaked hydrogen.

      Here is the thing: if the ship used helium and not hydrogen, it would still have burned and crashed. It was doomed even before the hydrogen caught fire. Even prior to the accident, the coating was disputed due to safety concerns. It was really good at keeping the water out, but the fire hazard was ignored and some of the few knowing this objected in writing. This writing still exist. Also had the captain decided to delay further due to safety concerns, nothing bad would have happened to him and the accident would have been avoided. However his pride didn't allow that and on behalf of Germany he wanted to return to Europe in time for the passengers to make it to the Coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth. Sure that was important, but important enough to crash?

      This type of accident is not unique to Germany or the past. In 2001, American Airlines Flight 587 taking off from New York encountered wake turbulence from the plane ahead of it. The pilot used the rudder quite a lot to counter it, despite the fact that full rudder is banned at that altitude/speed due to structural concerns of the plane. Parts of the tail fell off, the plane went out of control and crashed into Queens. It turned out that the pilot did precisely what he was told to do during training and a faulty training program was the main cause of the accident. Needless to say wake turbulence countermeasure training changed overnight.

  6. Re:can someone please explain for me by rossdee · · Score: 5, Funny

    "how do you say "D'oh!" in German?"

    Deuterium Hydroxide, also known as 'slightly heavy water'

  7. Re:can someone please explain for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    So what are the conceptual ideas for taking the energy out from a fusion reactor?

    They have a FAQ which includes an answer to your question.