Slashdot Mirror


Carly Fiorina Says Government Needs a Way To "Work Around" Encryption (dailydot.com)

Patrick O'Neill writes: Carly Fiorina wants the government to be able to "work around" encryption to aid intelligence agencies and law enforcement in their investigations, she said on Monday. The Republican presidential candidate and former HP CEO shifted the focus of her campaign to national security two days before the last Republican debate of 2015. Fiorina is the latest but not the first presidential candidate to weigh in on the encryption debate that has taken on a new life since terrorist attacks in Paris and California.

5 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No change in her technical competence since she ran HP into the ground, I see.

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
  2. Funny because we need a workaround also by burtosis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A workaround for overreaching governments and individuals abusing their power. It's metabullshit because you aren't obfuscating who the data is comming from, where it is going to, or even how often. Supposedly that was all that was important right? The American government couldn't secure their own data, idiocy is rampant. How exactly is compromising all business and personal transactions to intercept a nearly non-existent threat even helping at all, except to perhaps facilitate your own illegal agenda? FFS the day the government actually addresses issues in the order of deaths per year, or even in financial damages per year to the American public is the day hell will freeze over.

  3. What makes people think the government is so smart by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The republicans seems to state that the Government is a bunch of bumbling idiots where the free market can outperform it hands down, yet they also expect it able to perform things such as conspiracies where thousands of people are involved. Making a back door that only the government can break. Creating a super virus so advanced that no mortal individual outside the government can't possibly make.

    In short any government back door is a back door to the rest of the world. It isn't as much about the government spying on us, but who else, can. What if Snowden decided not to go public with the stuff he learned and decided to use it to profit off of the information? It takes one underpaid/underappreciated rouge employee to mess up any grand security system.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  4. Re:Good for her by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then a few of us will die, but the rest of us keep our freedom. It sure beats having more of us die under runaway tyrannical regimes while the rest of us toil under them. Ever notice how those who spy on others get more maniacal the more dirt they get? It builds a culture of paranoid delusion. Americans saw it first hand after 9/11. The reality is the threat never goes away. We can only choose how we live in spite of it.

    However, that doesn't mean we can't take action. If such people really are the threats claimed, then it's time to declare war on the countries enabling them. Compromising western values is exactly what they want us to do.

  5. NOBODY else is in Fiorina's league on this topic by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hillary is someone whom the country would be better without, but at least she doesn't score double-irony points with stuff like this:

    "I know this community. I know this industry. I know these people. I will engage them."

    Only Fiorina could get people laughing so hysterically with so few words. Even Trump has never said anything quite that shocking yet. This is like if Hillary were to sincerely brag about how faithful her husband has been.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump