Slashdot Mirror


US Stops British Muslim Family From Boarding Flight To Visit Disneyland (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader writes: U.S. authorities blocked a British Muslim family from boarding a plane at London's Gatwick airport. They were flying to Los Angeles on a trip to visit Disneyworld. "U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials provided no explanation for why the country refused to allow the family of 11 to board the plane, even though they had been granted travel authorization online ahead of their planned 15 December flight." This comes at a time when prominent groups and individuals within the U.S. are arguing in favor of blocking entrance for all Muslims. The refusal, and the U.S.'s unwillingness to explain, is raising concern within the UK government. The family is out $13,340 for their plane tickets.

12 of 704 comments (clear)

  1. Re:There are US DHS at London Gatwick?? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Informative

    US bound airlines submit lists of passengers to US authorities before departure. Anybody the US won't accept is not allowed to board though the strange thing here is that these people had all applied for visas in advance, and had them approved.

  2. Re:There are US DHS at London Gatwick?? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 5, Informative

    The screening is done at boarding time not because US authorities have long arms. US authorities have no jurisdiction over who does or doesn't board in the UK. What they are saying is "we won't admit this passenger if he shows up at the US border", Since the airline doesn't want to be stuck with passengers with no place to go once they arrive at the US border, they won't even let you board the flight if you wouldn't be admitted.

  3. Re:There are US DHS at London Gatwick?? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The UK does not need visa approval for US travel.

    This is not about visa travel. This is about the unconstitutional DHS no-fly checks.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Re:There are US DHS at London Gatwick?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The UK does not need visa approval for US travel. Anyone with a British passport is part of the visa waiver programme.

    We Brits don't need visa's, but do need to apply for ESTA (Electronic System for travel Authorisation) from the US in advance, even if we are using the Visa Waiver. This is what the family had done, and been granted travel approval.

  5. Re:There are US DHS at London Gatwick?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > This is about the unconstitutional DHS no-fly checks.

    Heh. But it's abroad, so the US constitution doesn't apply, right? As in Guantanamo?

    Folks -- the situation is so fucked up that there are no words to describe it. And it's deteriorating at a vertiginous pace. And we are all happily working on making it worse.

  6. I feel for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im a UK citizen, im not religious and I am a family man. Stripping back all of race/religion side of this I put myself in their place.

    If I have worked hard to save the money up to take my family on holiday, my children are excited to go do what would probably be a once in a life time experience for them. We fill in all the forms get visa do everything by the book. Then on the day just when we are about to get on the plane get told sorry you cant come, oh and all that duty free stuff you have we will be taking that, escorted out like criminals then told oh by the way all that money you worked so far for and paid? your not getting it back.

    I would be livid if it happened to just me, I would be would be enraged if it happend to me and my partner, but then to destroy my childrens hopes I would so angry it would be beyond describing in polite converstation.

    I would be kicking off to everyone and anyone. I don't care if it politically embarrases heads of state or not. So good on this family for doing the same. Race or religion may or may not have been part of the reason for this but putting that asside no family deserved to be treated in such a manner and if unless you think it would be acceptable for you and your family to be treated as such then its not ok for this family.

    I for one hope they get some explanation for this and if its not a good one they damned well better get appologise refunds and someone should make it up to those kids.

  7. France by DrYak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, there's Disneyland Paris, but...

    ...they might be on strike. :-D

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  8. Re:So? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Islamist activities, you mean like praying and celebrating holidays just like their Christian counterparts? Or is this a parody of dumbness who are too stupid to know that the word "Islam" is not synonymous with the word "terrorist?"

    Since many Muslims that pray and celebrate holidays are allowed to fly to the US every single day, maybe its not a big stretch to conclude there is another reason this particular group was flagged.

  9. Re:To summarize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The hassle is returning to the US.

    Last time I traveled from the US the only part of the trip that gave me a giant hassle was returning home. Pretty much everywhere else was just "scan your passport and go" but the US sent me through a two hour line to get through customs (as a citizen, mind you, there was a different "non-citizen" line) that combined with a delayed flight meant I missed my connecting flight home. Which I then had to go through a giant hassle to rebook because while the (foreign) airline I booked the flight through rebooked me on a new connecting flight, the US-based airline handling that flight refused to give me a boarding pass for that new flight. So then there was a second round of arguing with ticketing agents while jetlagged.

    And that was before I had to go through US airport security because foreign airport security doesn't count and the international terminal was a separate part of the airport than the domestic terminal anyway.

    It's the same with visiting Canada - getting into Canada as a US citizen is fairly easy. Returning to the US is a couple of hours as you deal with US customs.

  10. Re:To summarize by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A CLOAK? You wear a CLOAK? To hell with the beard, the Moorish ancestry, and any other shit you come up with. I'd give anyone in a fucking cloak the hairy eyeball too. WTF is with you people? Wear a coat. Wear a jacket. Wear a nice wool sweater. Don't come sneaking through security in a God-damned CLOAK! Are you a hobbit in disguise?

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  11. Re:No. There aren't. by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, there's already a few big news outlets that, strangely enough, seem to assume that Trump already has enough influence to revoke Visas.

    That's why I use MasterCard.

  12. Re:No. There aren't. by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I myself am wondering why this is even news at all. As far as I know, people are inexplicably denied entry to the US all the time, usually just for having a name "similar" to somebody with known terrorist ties. It's probably easier for that to happen if you happen to be from the middle east and have the same first and last name as somebody else from there who DOES have terrorist ties.

    But now we're getting "oh it's BECAUSE he was a muslim" and furthemore "Donald Trump is responsible for this" (yes, there's already a few big news outlets that, strangely enough, seem to assume that Trump already has enough influence to revoke Visas.)

    Isn't the fact that random people are inexplicably denied entry to the US enough to make it news worthy? Why isn't an explanation given along with a procedure to clear your name if you're incorrectly flagged on a watch list?