Slashdot Mirror


Why String Theory Is Not Science (forbes.com)

StartsWithABang writes: Earlier this month, a conference was held devoted to the question of whether untestable scientific ideas like string theory and the multiverse are actually science or not. While many opinions were stated and no one changed their mind, the answer is apparent: unless you're willing to change the definition of science to include "this thing that isn't science," then no, string theory is not science. It's a theory in the sense of a mathematical theory — like set theory, group theory or number theory — but it isn't yet a scientific theory. Of course, it could become science, but that would require that it actually do the things a scientific theory does: make testable predictions that can be validated or falsified.

2 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Climatology by plopez · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Once exposed it was corrected. Unlike the the Koch brothers shills.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  2. Re:Climatology by reboot246 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Nah, climatology is more closely related to astrology, phrenology, and palm-reading.