Slashdot Mirror


China Passes Law Requiring Tech Firms To Hand Over Encryption Keys (betanews.com)

Mark Wilson writes: Apple may have said that it opposes the idea of weakening encryption and providing governments with backdoors into products, but things are rather different in China. The Chinese parliament has just passed a law that requires technology companies to comply with government requests for information, including handing over encryption keys.

Under the guise of counter-terrorism, the controversial law is the Chinese government's attempt to curtail the activities of militants and political activists. China already faces criticism from around the world not only for the infamous Great Firewall of China, but also the blatant online surveillance and censorship that takes place. This latest move is one that will be view very suspiciously by foreign companies operating within China, or looking to do so.

81 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. whatever China wants by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    China gets.

    1. Re:whatever China wants by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So tech companies will have at least 2 product lines.

      a. for everywhere EXCEPT China
      b. for no place BUT China

      What will happen to this law once Chinese tech is not accepted anywhere except inside China?

      And how many Chinese companies will be able to produce anything from category "a"? Remember, there is a LOT of tech that is manufactured in China but still belongs to non-Chinese corporations.

    2. Re:whatever China wants by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      To say it is China 'only', is really inaccurate, there are a whole bunch of countries with similarly repressive regimes. You can understand their need to do so though. You have hundreds of millions working in poverty, working extremely hard, for bloody little recompense, this cheered on by western corporations (the idiots are cheering their own demise, fools) and keeping a lid on that social injustice takes real effort but that lid is loosening all of the time and they simultaneously seem to be easing off whilst applying more controls. Other regimes around the place are just down right evil or just becoming that way (lipstick on a very greedy pig, looks at us).

      What it means is rapidly rotating encryption keys and different keys for different users (1 per, have fun untangling that mess) and user to user encryption keys, completely separate from user to server encryption keys. You can not give them a copy of what you do not have.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:whatever China wants by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I don't really see why China needs the keys. They can just slap the suspects in jail and start applying electro-shock therapy until they spit out the passwords they require. I guess they're just lazy.

    4. Re:whatever China wants by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      China has to oppress/spy very hard to prevent the poor working class from starting a communist revolution, eh?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    5. Re:whatever China wants by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      They can just slap the suspects in jail and start applying electro-shock therapy until they spit out the passwords they require.

      That doesn't work when you have 1.3 billion suspects. This is not about investigating a few specific individuals, but about mass surveillance of the entire population.

    6. Re:whatever China wants by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      China has to oppress/spy very hard to prevent the poor working class from starting a communist revolution, eh?

      Actually, yes. There are a surprising number of "reactionary" communists in China, that want to go back to Maoism, despite the disastrous outcome of his policies. It is fairly common to see people with little Mao pins on their lapels, especially in inland areas, and some Hunan restaurants have little "Mao shrines" (Mao was from Hunan).

    7. Re:whatever China wants by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is already the law in many other countries, China is just catching up. Apple and everyone else will use the same privacy enhancing technique to avoid complying as they do everywhere - they won't have access to the keys. They will only be forced to turn over metadata, which is as bad or worse but hard to avoid.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:whatever China wants by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I see you completely missed the bit where the Government of China switched from communism to fascism without changing the name (left wing, right wing, reach around far enough and they touch).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:whatever China wants by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I don't really see why China needs the keys. They can just slap the suspects in jail and start applying electro-shock therapy until they spit out the passwords they require. I guess they're just lazy.

      That doesn't work for international companies, where the only key holders reside outside China. No matter how many people they strongarm in China, they don't know the passwords and don't have the other end of dual-key pairs needed to decrypt anything vital.

    10. Re:whatever China wants by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I understand it well enough. I was commenting on someone who thought that China could always strong-arm the keys or passwords, which won't work. Companies will protect their assets from the Chinese, and pull out if the Chinese won't play ball.

      It's not necessarily good news for Americans as much as it is good news for other countries with cheaper manufacturing than the US. Korea comes to mind.

    11. Re:whatever China wants by johanw · · Score: 1

      That doesn't matter much, Chinese workers are getting more expensive already. Foxconn is opening factories in cheaper India already.

    12. Re:whatever China wants by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I see you completely missed the bit where the Government of China switched from communism to fascism without changing the name (left wing, right wing, reach around far enough and they touch).

      Was China ever really communist? The guys at the top have always had it much, much better than everyone else. I doubt perfect Communism is even possible without a computer running the show, but they didn't even come close.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:whatever China wants by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      So tech companies will have at least 2 product lines.

      No. You and everyone else here is WRONG! Let me tell you what will happen.

      China, India, the EU, America, etc, will come together on a treaty binding agreement by which each nation has access to their own citizens data without compromising the sovereignty and rights of others. Born out of this unholy alliance will be a "Government API" baked into the next iOS, OSX, Android, Windows, and other commercially available OSs**, and possibly at the hardware level too. What this means is that when you activate your new devices, you choose where you live (as you abide by their laws). From there, your encryption will be chosen with the system that the respective nation has access too.

      **I begin not to suspect what will happen to open source platforms other than deemed to be illegal (possibly).

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    14. Re:whatever China wants by KGIII · · Score: 1

      20 years ago, I'd have called you an idiot. Dunno what to make of that but, alas, that's how it was - at least on the surface.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    15. Re:whatever China wants by Agripa · · Score: 1

      So tech companies will have at least 2 product lines.

      a. for everywhere EXCEPT China
      b. for no place BUT China

      The difference could amount to no more than a change in firmware or configuration.

    16. Re:whatever China wants by Agripa · · Score: 1

      They can just slap the suspects in jail and start applying electro-shock therapy until they spit out the passwords they require.

      That doesn't work when you have 1.3 billion suspects. This is not about investigating a few specific individuals, but about mass surveillance of the entire population.

      It also does not work if I took steps such that when my hardware was seized, the encryption key in physical form like the ordering of a deck of cards or bills was destroyed.

      "Why yes officer, I will be happy to hand over my encryption key. The key was encoded in the stack of bills which was in the envelope next to the computer so I will need those to recover it ... Um, these are out of order and the higher denominations are missing."

    17. Re:whatever China wants by Agripa · · Score: 1

      To say it is China 'only', is really inaccurate, there are a whole bunch of countries with similarly repressive regimes.

      And while these smaller countries may not have the moxie to enforce key recovery on the manufacturers, they will not need to if the US (or China?) does it for them.

  2. It's kinda horrifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's kinda horrifying that we are so close to chinese draconian laws or even further advanced that we can't even complain about them. This is about to be implemented in the U.S. and in U.K. you get to stay in jail until you reveal your password.

    1. Re: It's kinda horrifying by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      Weve definitely lost the moral high ground.

  3. China by liqu1d · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please stop being the UK govs role model...

  4. Like it would matter much by daniel23 · · Score: 1

    If a key which is in the hands of a company (Apple, Huawei, ...) is your only line of defence WRT the security/privacy of content you supply or save, then you should regard this content to be public and open for preying eyes already. I think it is called "trusted" in that negative, military sense.
    Just like email sent to a @gmail.com account or company secrets in an office365 account. Your grandma and neighbour won't get there, police/law enforcement will have sever problems. But 3LetterAgencies of many governments will read it if they want to.

    --
    605413? Yes, it's a prime.
  5. This might be good for the USA by giltwist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just like the USA distanced itself from eugenics (such as the mandatory sterilization of people with mental disabilities) when it got popular with the Nazis, maybe China demanding encryption keys will get some American politicians to back off of the idea.

    1. Re:This might be good for the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Too late, they already passed CISA. America has already demanded the encryption keys as "information sharing."

    2. Re:This might be good for the USA by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Politicians in the U.S. and Europe will have no difficulty in, on the one hand, decrying this as an oppressive move by a non-democratic government while simultaneously, on the other hand, continuing to demand that THEY need exactly the same thing in order to combat terrorism.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:This might be good for the USA by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      There is *way* too much money to be made by having access to these keys. Every government in the world will demand them.

      Funny you should say that. Cue the NSA (plus some more daring entrepreneurs) getting access to the Chinese backdoors, and thus p0wning every device in China. Lots and lots of money to be made, easily enough to pay huge bribes to whatever government official can sell you the backdoor.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:This might be good for the USA by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Just like the USA distanced itself from eugenics (such as the mandatory sterilization of people with mental disabilities) when it got popular with the Nazis, maybe China demanding encryption keys will get some American politicians to back off of the idea.

      Well china also has laws against murder and rape. Just because we don't see eye-to-eye doesn't mean that we can't ever agree on something if it makes sense and protects innocent people.

      That is what the politicians will say. Or some version of that anyway. Don't think for a minute that they won't find a way to argue around it.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:This might be good for the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just like the USA distanced itself from eugenics (such as the mandatory sterilization of people with mental disabilities) when it got popular with the Nazis...

      Perhaps I'm forgetting history, but IIRC the USA actually embraced eugenics with the rise in popularity of the Nazis and it was only AFTER the war and the holocaust that eventually the USA quietly back-peddled on support of such things--in private, there was still plenty of support as even today Social Darwinism and eugenics are still here.

      ...maybe China demanding encryption keys will get some American politicians to back off of the idea.

      As if there was some idea that China wasn't or isn't demanding (or secretly creating) backdoors, encryption keys, etc. If anything, this just gives more fuel to the "well, we got to do it to protect ourselves" bullshit. Because it's all bullshit and the people who want it want the same sort of inherent tyranny that China has. The whole "for law enforcement purposes, we need to be able to get the information [under a court order]" is inherently bullshit for the obvious reason that the argument justifies putting cameras everywhere, recording all phone calls, opening and copying all mail, etc with the "[under a court order]" to search it.

      How about we just call the people for what they are: wanna-be Stalins and Hitlers. There's no reason to pussyfoot around it and discuss the relatively minor shit that China does or use/abuse their actions for justification for/against anything.

    6. Re:This might be good for the USA by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most Americans are against warrantless surveillance on both sides of the political spectrum.

      Most Americans have no idea what encryption or data surveillance entails, and are more concerned with the price of TV dinners at Wal-Mart.

    7. Re:This might be good for the USA by galactus66 · · Score: 1

      LoL, most Mricans don't even know who Snowden is and what their government is doing under their noses..

    8. Re:This might be good for the USA by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I wish this were so but politicians will call for China to not have encryption keys and then turn around and demand that the US government have all the encryption keys without any sense of cognitive dissonance. Many of these politicians will continue on to rail against big government while still arguing that government should have back doors into all encryption.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  6. Re:What is the implication for companies by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> What is the implication for companies that don't have keys to hand over then? Backdoors, key escrow pushed into the applications, etc.

  7. Democrats by AndyKron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't the Democrats want basically the same thing?

    1. Re:Democrats by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Both the Democans and Republicrats want to kill encryption, albeit for different ultimate purposes. (Amusingly, both you and AC just below had the same thought simultaneously.)

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Democrats by cavreader · · Score: 2

      China can make a law such as this because they do not have to worry about any domestic protests or complaints. They do not have an adversarial forum to debate new laws. The only discussion in amongst the top Party leaders behind closed doors.

    3. Re:Democrats by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It's actually a bipartisan issue. Almost any time the Repukes and Dumbcraps get together on something you know the American people are about to get reamed.

    4. Re:Democrats by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Democrats want to spy on us to get more power, without losing too many votes from Democrat voters.
      The Republicans want to spy on us to get more power, without losing too many votes from Republican voters.
      Thus, the justification for the spying is different because it has to appeal to different demographics.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    5. Re:Democrats by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Most of the politicians do. They don't understand the math, or the economics, or any other of the concepts. What they do know is that they have to respond to accusations that they're being weak on fighting terrorists. There's no left or right ideology here other than to look like you're being useful to the voters.

      Law enforcement if left unchecked will assume more and more power, and the government is being lax in its duties by not saying "no" to those grabbing hands more often. If their only goal is to stop all crime then the logical end result is to remove all freedoms from all citizens; prevent crime by incarcerating or separating everyone. The rule in law enforcement is to assume guilt until innocence is proven, and if innocence is proven then submit a press release that objects vigorously to letting the suspect go. And so they are lobbying the politicians trying to get their way, "it's easy" they say, "just let us have a back door!"

    6. Re:Democrats by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      It don't matter. Civil disobedience is still a thing, and if you're willing to spend some time in jail, not because you are guilty, but because you believe in something, then it doesn't matter what any political party wants.

      Gonna do like they did during the prohibition and drink anyway? Gonna do like they did when being black was a crime?

      Or you gonna post nihilistic garbage every time some other country does something that, due to the deep tradition in feudalism and monarchy, and willingness to disappear people basically in public, is really only possible there?

      Oh, make parallels if you like, but be sincere. Don't be stupid so that I have to point out your stupidity.

    7. Re:Democrats by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Everyone is Washington DC that's pushing this will be Investing in BlackBerry (RIM) stock. Once the law goes into effect, stock will soar!!! And the best part? You won't do fuck-all to stop it! Democracy all a charade because the populous stopped giving a damn a long time ago.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  8. Re:Damn! They beat us to the punch! by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, if the Chinese are doing it, doesn't that mean that it's an evil commie tactic that no God-fearing American would ever even suggest using?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  9. How interested is Apple in selling stuff in China? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The answer to that question is the answer to the larger issue here.

    .
    If Apple wants to continue selling devices in China (which is a needed market for Apple, as the US market is becoming saturated), then Apple will comply with the laws of China.

    It's as simple as that.

  10. Easy solution by Dishwasha · · Score: 2

    Give Chinese consumers crippleware products so no company cares enough to protect its Chinese sold IP.

  11. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Seems simple enough. An iPhone 666.

  12. Yet another reason by swillden · · Score: 2

    Yet another reason for companies to make sure they don't have the keys to their users' data. You can't provide what you provably never had.

    Of course, if governments require vendors to escrow the keys that strategy won't work. But it doesn't appear that China has gone that far.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  13. Re:Apple should leave China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is a fucking atrocious idea. Giving into China here nullifies their "we don't play that" stance. Uncle Sam will know that they DO play that way; if you threaten Apple's profits. Once that door is open Uncle Sam will get what he wants.

    This isn't a vague slippery slope fallacy either. This is a direct consequence.

  14. Re:Why? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    This latest move is one that will be view very suspiciously by foreign companies operating within China, or looking to do so.

    Why would they view it suspiciously? They'll fall into line and do what the Chinese government requires of them because they'll deem it worth the cost. Money and profits above all else.

    Yep. Research In Motion paved the way when they handed over BES encryption keys to the Indians.

  15. Certs by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

    ...and removing all Chinese certs from my trusted certs list in 5....4....3...

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  16. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

    then Apple will comply with the laws of China.

    As most of us have found out when going for PCI compliance, the best way to protect data is often not to possess it. If the keys are generated by the consumer, than it is the consumer that needs to hand over the keys, and not Apple. My understanding is that Apple cannot decrypt customer data, even if they wanted to, as only the customers possess the key(s) to do so.

  17. Clinton does, Sanders doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sanders voted against CISA while Clinton wants a "Manhattan Project" where Google, Apple, and MS give the government your keys "voluntarily".

    1. Re:Clinton does, Sanders doesn't by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      She said no such thing. Read her comments again, she said she understands the danger of having keys like that from companies. Her Manhattan Project quote shows she wants to work with companies to try and come up with a solution, if there is one, nothing more. We all know there is no solution other than having better hackers than everyone else.

      People falling for headlines over the actual substance again.

  18. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by StormReaver · · Score: 2

    If Apple wants to continue selling devices in China (which is a needed market for Apple, as the US market is becoming saturated), then Apple will comply with the laws of China.

    Which is why it is better for all tech firms to not have access to encryption keys. End to end encryption needs to be the standard, so there are no keys to turn over.

  19. Re:Damn! They beat us to the punch! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    Wait, if the Chinese are doing it, doesn't that mean that it's an evil commie tactic that no God-fearing American would ever even suggest using?

    Not if they sell them in Wal-Mart.

  20. Iceberg dead ahead by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    A difficult choice for tech companies is coming. If they provide the Chinese with the backdoors they ask for, they can't very well deny any other governments who ask for the same thing now can they ? They'll have to build country compliant models to appease every little dictator on the planet :|

    Otoh, if they refuse to play ball, they'll be blocked from selling products in the country, depriving them of large amounts of revenue. Perhaps this is how China will force it's citizens onto China authorized products instead of Apple, Androids, etc.

    After all, it's easier to control people when you limit their choices.

    My guess, however, is that the dollar signs are flashing before their eyes even as I type this. If we know Google and Apple half as well as we think we do, you know they're going to cave in because it's just too much money to give up. In the business world, $$$ > morals every time.

    1. Re:Iceberg dead ahead by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends.

      Consider that Android is Open Source. Google can easily not include it on their phones sold in the US. I'm not sure how many Nexus phones Google sells in China but I can't imagine that it's that many. Google wouldn't take a huge hit in sales if they just didn't sell their Nexus phones in China and they'd probably make promotional hay out of it--"We'll forgo our sales in China to keep your data as safe as possible." As you say, there are plenty of Chinese companies who already sell Android phones in China and I'm sure it wouldn't be a big deal for them to come up with a version of Android that has breakable encryption.

    2. Re:Iceberg dead ahead by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Everything China does is for their own benefit. They only allow foreign corporations to do business in China so they can steal their technology and trade secrets. As soon as they have done that they set up home grown competition and block the foreign sales. Doing business in China is corporate suicide.

  21. View of the law via Chinese press by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2
    China adopts first counter-terrorism law in history

    ...The law establishes basic principles for counter-terrorism work and strengthens measures of prevention, handling, punishment as well as international cooperation, he said.

    Under the new bill, telecom operators and internet service providers are required to provide technical support and assistance, including decryption, to police and national security authorities in prevention and investigation of terrorist activities.

    They should also prevent dissemination of information on terrorism and extremism.

    Li Shouwei of the National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee legislative affairs commission, said the rule accorded with the actual work needed to fight terrorism and was basically the same as other major countries.

    "The clause reflects lessons China has learned from other countries and is a result of wide solicitation of public opinion," he added.

    "(It) will not affect companies' normal business nor install backdoors to infringe intellectual property rights, or ... citizens freedom of speech on the internet and their religious freedom," Li said.

    China's national security law adopted in July also requires Internet and information technology, infrastructure, information systems and data in key sectors to be "secure and controllable"....

  22. Re: Apple should leave China by awehttam · · Score: 1

    Why not? Region coded crypto keys...

  23. Re:Damn! They beat us to the punch! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Nah, it only means that China is now imitating the west.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  24. Apple should NOT leave China by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple should comply with this request, it is actually a very good thing for the US (and terrible for china). By creating this backdoor, China is painting a huge target on the server(s) that store these 'master keys'. Every foreign intelligence agency in the world will want in and they will get in. Someone will forget to check a password buffer when coding it, or someone with an admin password will be presented with embarrassing pictures, and then wham! every western Intel agency will have access to the phone data for all the important people in China. This data will need to be used by so many people that it should be trivial to compromise someone with a master key.

    Apple will then be complying with China's laws, and can keep raking in the bucks by selling them easy to compromise phones and personal gadgetry. Nothing requires them to then cripple their phones in other parts of the world, which they will presumably not do so they can claim that they have a secure platform as a sales point every else. Win Win.

    Of course, the person getting fucked is the average Chinese person. They are being ass-reamed even harder by the government stooges, but perhaps this will be the thing that finally pisses the populace off enough to finally rise up and start hanging all the communist stooges running the country.

    I bet the NSA is having a massive Christmas circle jerk over this one. Their job just became a million times easier...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Apple should NOT leave China by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Apple should comply with this request

      When Apple doesn't have the keys in the first place, is that really non-compliance? And if so, how would they be expected to *POSSIBLY* "comply"? How can they hand over encryption keys they do not have?

    2. Re:Apple should NOT leave China by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Seems trivial to:

      if (region == china) {
          uploadKeychain(...);
      }

    3. Re:Apple should NOT leave China by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Step 2 will be banning any encryption where the company doesn't hold the keys (and thus can't give them to the government).

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:Apple should NOT leave China by c · · Score: 1

      Apple should comply with this request, it is actually a very good thing for the US (and terrible for china).

      I'd actually like to see Google produce a phone, calling it, say, the "Nexus Patriot" or "Nexus Law Enforcement Edition", implementing full backdoor capabilities. And, when they start selling it, pre-emptively send the decryption keys and all necessary software to all government security agencies, including those of pariah nations like North Korea.

      If that doesn't make a lasting point... ah, who am I kidding. These fuckers still wouldn't get it.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    5. Re: Apple should NOT leave China by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Yes, this "code" runs on the phone where the keys reside. If Apple doesn't store the keys on its servers and you don't store the keys on your phone, how can anyone use the keys?

    6. Re:Apple should NOT leave China by Agripa · · Score: 1

      When Apple doesn't have the keys in the first place, is that really non-compliance? And if so, how would they be expected to *POSSIBLY* "comply"? How can they hand over encryption keys they do not have?

      US law and court decisions matter not one whit to China however in the more restrictive US, I expect it would go something like this at least as far as the courts:

      The US already has a court decision which says ephemeral data, that which was stored in RAM even momentarily, is subject to court ordered seizure even if that requires alteration the programming. This could just as easily apply to any temporary state used to setup encryption. So at least in the US, the court can order Apple to change the programming of its devices to record and seize the ephemeral state used by the encryption which can then be used to provide any encryption keys.

      I assume Apple would fight this in court but a secrecy order would prevent any of their customers from knowing about it even after resolution.

      The problem as I see it as least in the US is more political. Unless this could all be done in secret through the executive branch and the courts, a law passed by Congress would create widespread resistance either in the form of challenges or subversion. The ideal situation for the government is where everybody *thinks* that their private communications are protected by the 4th amendment when in reality they are secretly monitored.

  25. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by mark-t · · Score: 1

    How would Apple not be complying with China's laws if they had no keys to hand over? Or would they assume that Apple was simply lying?

  26. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's quite interesting actually because now we get to see what sort of price Apple places upon its principles and core values.

    An Apple's core is the part you throw out.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  27. Re:What is the implication for companies by johanw · · Score: 1

    Not to mention things like open source encryption software like GnuPG or Signal. They sell nothing so need no local front to deal with payments. Only remaining option is they get blocked (hi Brasil).

  28. Wording. by drolli · · Score: 1

    Always mind you wording in reporting of such things.

    If China does it, it's oppression of liberty. If we do it, it's the fight against crime an terrorism.

  29. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    " Good luck buying enough rare earth elements for Your electronics, because we control 97% of worlds market for them." Too bad you posted as AC, because I think this is actually the biggest "risk" in general, and not just because of this recent encryption issue. All of our modern electronics needs these, the US shut down it's major rare earth mine at Mountain Pass, CA several years ago. We could try to recycle more phones...but once again most recycling centers are also over in China. Even if we found a new amazing rare earths deposit it takes years to build a mine. The most abundant source we've found so far is probably the Moon, but it will probably be another 25-50 years before we have a functioning mining colony there if ever.

  30. This is a Wonderful Opportunity by NReitzel · · Score: 1

    This is a great opportunity for hackers to exploit back doors and move money from the Chinese economy to (say) the Russian economy.

    A government mandated back door is otherwise known as a zero-day exploit.

    Woohooo....

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

  31. So. by pruedz · · Score: 1

    "But also the blatant online surveillance and censorship that takes place." Just like America... And Brazil....

  32. Hyperbole by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    Companies / service providers which maintain access to locked containers may be compelled to unlock them upon government request.
    In which country is this NOT true?

    Of course the state of encryption nowadays is that companies are using the same lock combination for ALL their containers. That is a problem that needs to be fixed (perfect forward secrecy).

    Another problem is that companies who carry information often do this by accepting a message from person A and then repackaging it for person B -- which makes them liable for the contents of the message. This is also also fixable (messages sent from person A should be locked only for opening by person B).

    I fully support the content of this news article insofar as it has not infringed on The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and as it is bringing more attention to these two existing issues above.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  33. Not just China's goal by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    "Under the guise of counter-terrorism, the controversial law is the Chinese government's attempt to curtail the activities of militants and political activists."

    This is always the case, whether it's the Chinese government or any other. I wish more people in the general public understood that. At least I don't have to change my sig.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  34. Re:Damn! They beat us to the punch! by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    You are suggesting this is a recent change. China has been imitating the USA for a long time. It's likely the US also demands encryption keys, but the law is probably secret.

  35. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    I don't think the US government would allow Apple to sell a product that they couldn't spy on.

  36. Re:How interested is Apple in selling stuff in Chi by mark-t · · Score: 1

    They already are.

  37. The Death of IBM by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Now that IBM has sold of the last of their server systems to Lenovo, after following dumping all their PC operations to the same Chinese Lenovo a few years ago... The legacy of IBM is compromised crap.

  38. Two girls with green eyes? by Ham+Javelin · · Score: 1

    China is here, Mr. Burton!

  39. Re:Damn! They beat us to the punch! by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Yay, go Trump!

    --
    Only I can judge you.