OCZ RevoDrive 400 NVMe SSD Unveiled With Nearly 2.7GB/Sec Tested Throughput (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: Solid State Drive technology continues to make strides in performance, reliability and cost. At the CES 2016 show there were a number of storage manufacturers on hand showing off their latest grear, though not many made quite the splash that Toshiba's OCZ Technology group made with the annoucement of their new RevoDrive 400 NVMe PCI Express SSD. OCZ is tapping on Toshiba's NVMe controller technology to deliver serious bandwidth in this consumer-targeted M.2 gumstick style drive that also comes with a X4 PCI Express card adapater. The drive boasts specs conservatively at 2.4GB/sec for reads and 1.6GB/sec for writes in peak sequential transfer bandwidth. IOPs are rated at 210K and 140K for writes respectively. In the demo ATTO test they were running, the RevoDrive 400 actually peaks at 2.69GB/sec for reads and also hits every bit of that 1.6GB/sec write spec for large sequential transfers.

Comments

No supercapacitors?

[butlerm]

I think it is more than a little amusing that anyone cares about performance numbers on a drive like this without first asking whether the drive provides any assurance that it won't catastrophically lose all your data, if not be bricked permanently, due to a simple power loss. That seems to be par for the course with the most of the SSDs on the market. Preserving your data? That is an enterprise feature.

Re:No supercapacitors?

[Anonymous Coward]

regular spinning drives don't provide any assurance against catastrophic data loss, either. you should always have backups.

Re:No supercapacitors?

[TeknoHog]

regular spinning drives don't provide any assurance against catastrophic data loss, either. you should always have backups.

When the power suddenly goes out, regular spinning drives don't generally lose everything that's already on platters. With SSDs, their internal state is more in flux, as older blocks can still be reorganized all the time. Also, there's much more logic between the actual storage and the outside interface, so a bad controller can easily make everything inaccessible, even if the data is still there in the storage medium.

Not a fan

[jargonburn]

I'm pretty sure every drive (small sample size) I've used from OCZ has failed within two years. And half the RAM.

I don't use them, anymore; I got tired of them using me.

Re:OCZ = Toshiba

[TeknoHog]

Why on Earth would they use the infamous OCZ name when Toshiba was a perfectly good hard drive brand (at least until the Hitachi deal)?

Re:Actual benefit in regular use vs. SATA3 SSD?

[Kjella]

These kinds of sequential benchmarks don't really tell me how much real-world time something like this will shave off booting a computer, launching an application, etc versus a more conventional solution.

About as much faster as you'd get to work in a race car. If you're not doing anything storage intense, the PCIe bandwidth is not going to make much of a difference. Same with NVMe, main advantage is at big queue depths. This technology isn't coming because consumers are demanding it, but because of enterprise needs. Now they're looking for prosumers who are willing to pay more, but not quite enterprise money for performance. I'm guessing eventually it'll trickle down to consumers since PCIe and NVMe are far more natural interfaces for SSDs than SATA but it won't make much of a real world difference. A bit like DDR4, it doesn't really offer much over DDR3 for consumers but because the enterprise needs it, it's trickled down to Skylake.