Slashdot Mirror


Diary of Anne Frank Subject To Copyright Dispute (theguardian.com)

Bruce66423 writes: The Diary of Anne Frank, a Jewish teenager killed by the Nazis whose writing survived in the Amsterdam building where she had hidden, is causing problems. It has been 70 years since she died, making it public domain by European law. A French academic has made it available online with profits going to charity. However, the Anne Frank Fonds, the foundation established by Anne’s father Otto Frank, claims that: “Otto Frank and children’s author and translator, Mirjam Pressler, were inter alia responsible for the various edited versions of fragments of the diary” in 1947 and 1991. They add: "the copyrights to these adaptations have been vested in Otto Frank and Mirjam Pressler, who in effect created readable books from Anne Frank’s original writings."

4 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. Yet more proof ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... greed destroys history.

    We already have this shenanigans with early 8-bit software lost to the annuls of time because of some bullshit copyright that we're not allowed to preserve for fear that someday, somewhere, some company will want to try to "leverage" archaic Imaginary Property.
     

  2. Editors are not authors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The debate over whether editors have a copyright interest in a given work is not a new debate. What is different about this case is that the author could not have any say over how her works were edited or say over whether her writings should have been published in the first place. Most of the edits done were to remove personal family information or mundane aspects of Anne's life. Because most of the edits were removing information, I'd suggest that Otto could not be considered an author. Indeed, in all the copies I have seen published, none of them credit Otto or Mirjam as co-authors. While they may have some copyright claim previously, those copyrights ended with the life of the author plus 70 years, not editor plus 70 years, and not publisher plus 70 years.

  3. Re: Slashdot: News for SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or more accurately because copyright law has been a part of geek culture since forever? Or have we all forgotten about that? You know, the EFF, the FSF, the DMCA, Lawrence Lessig, open source/free software, copyleft...

  4. Re:Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Love that stereotype. For several centuries Jewish people were excluded from every guild and profession with damn few options being left open apart from money lending. So hey, lets hold that against them just because they weren't considerate enough to starve to death in a gutter instead.