Slashdot Mirror


New Clues To How the Brain Maps Time (quantamagazine.org)

An anonymous reader sends this excerpt from Quanta Magazine: Our brains have an extraordinary ability to monitor time. A driver can judge just how much time is left to run a yellow light; a dancer can keep a beat down to the millisecond. But exactly how the brain tracks time is still a mystery. Researchers have defined the brain areas involved in movement, memory, color vision and other functions, but not the ones that monitor time. Indeed, our neural timekeeper has proved so elusive that most scientists assume this mechanism is distributed throughout the brain, with different regions using different monitors to keep track of time according to their needs.

Over the last few years, a handful of researchers have compiled growing evidence that the same cells that monitor an individual's location in space also mark the passage of time. This suggests that two brain regions — the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex, both famous for their role in memory and navigation — can also act as a sort of timer.

79 comments

  1. Yeah Yeah by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And they stitch sensory input together to provide the illusion of continuity to the various bits. It's the only way the entire system could possibly maintain the level of cohesion it does.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  2. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the way of their kind.

  3. As my physics teacher once said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time is what keeps everything from happening at once.

    The best part is we're discussing the brain's timekeeping mechanisms -- keep in mind that your sensory perception has a built-in time delay.

    1. Re:As my physics teacher once said by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Time is what keeps everything from happening at once.

      Time is assumed to be one of the dimensions we live in, what if it's only visible from our perspective in our universe but not visible at all from an outside observer? To an outside observer our universe may be just an instant flash and impossible to measure in their notion of time.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:As my physics teacher once said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time is what keeps everything from happening at once.

      Time is assumed to be one of the dimensions we live in, what if it's only visible from our perspective in our universe but not visible at all from an outside observer? To an outside observer our universe may be just an instant flash and impossible to measure in their notion of time.

      You can make any old crap up and say "what if". To get the Nobel prize you need to show some sort of evidence.

    3. Re: As my physics teacher once said by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not 'assumed' any more than distance is assumed. Our universe has parameters. Light travels at a constant speed, or at a constant distance, or at a constant time - it's all the same, just different perspectives. Distance is a function of time or light, or lightspeed is a function of distance - these are just words the apes trip on as they're trying to understand reality in the terms of forests, railroads, and stars.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  4. The relativity of time and learning by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to me that the relativity of time seems to decrease with age and experience. In School five minutes could be an eternity while when you were having fun it went in a flash.

    But now when I'm older it seems to me that I have a reasonable time awareness most of the time, waking up when it's time to wake up, knowing that it's time to stop doing what I'm doing when it's time to do something else and so on.

    Overall it seems to me that the brain has now linked tasks to time awareness even without really thinking of it. Only rarely when the task at hand requires a very high level of attention it's easy to lose track of time.

    The Slashdot quote of the moment seems to fit this subject too: "Promptness is its own reward, if one lives by the clock instead of the sword."

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re: The relativity of time and learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh! I thought it was "Romp Ness is its own rewad, iFone lives by the cock instead of the word."

    2. Re:The relativity of time and learning by bakes · · Score: 1

      I found that my own perception of time improved remarkably after I stopped wearing a watch all the time. When I was 18 my watch was stolen, and I never bothered to get a new one. This was before mobile phones, nowadays I still don't wear a watch but I do carry a phone most of the time - although my perception of time is still pretty good. As you say, that could be age/experience rather than more practice when I was younger.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    3. Re:The relativity of time and learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have heard it suggested that our perception of longer time periods is proportional to the amount of time we have experienced, so if you are 10 years old, a year is 10% of your life, and a long long time, whereas when you are 50 years old, a year is only 2% of your life, so a year flashes by and you are surprised that it's Christmas again.

      Shorter periods are still variable, so waiting for a dentist with a toothache takes a long time, but eating ice cream is over in a flash (unless you have a toothache!).

    4. Re: The relativity of time and learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that useful contribution to the conversation. It was in no way a waste of my time or yours.

      Dumb ass.

    5. Re:The relativity of time and learning by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      While working as a chef I found that I could put things in the oven, completely forget about them and go on with other tasks. My internal timer would go off exactly when the food was supposed to come out of the oven. It's been timed by others. Correct to within seconds. Didn't bother with timers. Even if I'd forgotten that I'd put something in the oven, the internal timer would remind me at the right time. At a trattoria I knew where every pizza etc was in the belt driven oven too. Could tell the head chef or front of house exactly when each dish would be coming out. Don't know how it works, but it works.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    6. Re:The relativity of time and learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have heard it suggested that our perception of longer time periods is proportional to the amount of time we have experienced, so if you are 10 years old, a year is 10% of your life, and a long long time, whereas when you are 50 years old, a year is only 2% of your life, so a year flashes by and you are surprised that it's Christmas again.

      Yeah, that idea occurred to me when I was 12. You're absolutely right.

  5. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, you're just not smart enough to comprehend what is going on.

  6. getting the measure of it by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

    is it possible that those areas of the brain are associated with the concept of quantity of any kind (length, weight, number) and that this is just another measure, maybe a count of other neural activity in some way. After all, perception of time seems to vary considerably depending on what's going on.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:getting the measure of it by Calydor · · Score: 1

      If the brain's ability to keep track of time is based on neural activity (I can't help but compare it a bit to ancient computer games that used the CPU clock to determine speed ...), that could be linked to the way time seems to slow down if you find yourself in a suddenly dangerous situation, with the brain going into a momentary overdrive to find a solution before it's too late.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  7. Re:But how does a... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    No, it's just turning into one of these WTF threads that you see all to often when there's a major election coming up. A few months after the election it will be quiet again when it comes to political threads unless something major happens.

    Deal with it.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  8. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And against scientific thinking. For the rest of us, we recoil in horror at their kind.

  9. Re: But huow does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No u just stupid

  10. Space Time - Continue ... Ummmm? by millertym · · Score: 1

    Considering time is directly linked to movement through space it's not surprising our brains use the same area to measure and remember both.

    1. Re:Space Time - Continue ... Ummmm? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      Not surprising, but not trivial. This is still pretty big news.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  11. Simple answer by ls671 · · Score: 1

    When your are sitting on a turned on oven burner, your brain maps time slow. When you are on holiday or otherwise enjoying yourself, your brain maps time fast.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:Simple answer by jondeanmack · · Score: 0

      Your signature implies you write light! My background colour is white. Black text.

  12. ObXKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://www.xkcd.com/1524/

  13. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its a hugcircle moran. Unlike u we dont put people in corners

  14. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their kind just doesn't know any better.

  15. Perhaps there is no time for brains to map by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    Physicists and philosophers have not been any more successful, really

      "most scientists assume this mechanism is distributed throughout the brain, with different regions using different monitors to keep track of time according to their needs"

    Or maybe this mechanism is distributed throughout everything, all at once, and keeping track of time is just a perceived phenomenological need. ...or whatever that means.... string cheese, anyone?

  16. Spliffs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to slow down my time by ~2x

    I.e. The 30sec electric toothbrush cycle seems... busted. Also, timed distance fails, you turn too soon. I.e. Turning towards a door in a dark corridor you know well. Try it sometime, see whether you can estimate a minute.

  17. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering they think we don't know they're stacking people like cordwood at Gitmo, they're pretty stupid.

  18. Brain tracking time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or are you just given the ability from God to do more as you grow older? Minus Dr. Who type Time travel.

    1. Re:Brain tracking time. by jondeanmack · · Score: 0

      Posted by me while not logged in.

  19. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. Anyone self aware isn't one of them.

  20. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with a hugbox? I don't understand the point you're trying to make.

  21. No concept of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The brain has no concept of time. It only has a concept of events. Time is merely the absence of events and the relative structure of events that creates. So, if I want to measure a minute, I need to think of a series of rather predictable events. And that is what the brain does to measure and understand time.

    1. Re:No concept of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. I can wake up in the morning at any specific time without an alarm clock. But it needs to be a pretty important event next day I have to catch. But I know peeps who can casually wake up at any specific time. They observe time like a fucking cosmic beholder. I envy them.

  22. Old old story by no-body · · Score: 1

    > Our brains have an extraordinary ability to monitor time.
    If you can't manage seeing speed, either you get eaten or you starve because you cannot eat - talking reptiles, insects, even much lower. You are prey or looking for prey (redundant - not sure for what that's good).
    Glad somebody is figuring out the how's after all that time it exists..

  23. Timing Genes by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

    I once tried to locate timing genes due to the shape of the protein.... I cant remember the amino acid sequence I was after. Hoping to get back into that project someday. It would be the most important gene in the genome. Worthy of a patent.

  24. Down to the millisecond??? Dubious by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Maybe within 10 milliseconds, perhaps... but a millisecond is far too brief a duration for a human being to assess or even respond with muscle memory.

    1. Re:Down to the millisecond??? Dubious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not measuring a reaction to an action. A good drummer with decade (or years) of practice, can most definitely can time their beats to a millisecond accuracy. It is a requirement, plenty of drummers do it, it is not even debatable.

    2. Re:Down to the millisecond??? Dubious by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 0

      It is a requirement

      No it isn't.

      plenty of drummers do it

      No they don't.

      it is not even debatable.

      Sure it is, unless you've actually got some evidence and aren't just shooting your mouth off.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Down to the millisecond??? Dubious by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's some information on the accuracy of drummers, with and without a click track: http://musicmachinery.com/2009...

    4. Re:Down to the millisecond??? Dubious by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a competent-but-not-record-industry-worthy guitarist, I'm frequently stunned by myself when I've been away from the instrument for a bit I start picking out a tune I haven't played in a long time. It just flows, and I almost feel out of control because I can't actually follow and understand what my fingers are doing -- but it's right, even on fast runs.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    5. Re:Down to the millisecond??? Dubious by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The page you provide a link to kind of supports what I was saying.... that human beings can't accurately time anything with millisecond precision. If those graphs are accurate, then I was pretty close to being on the mark when I suggested 10 milliseconds is probably a more reasonable accuracy estimate. The only ones that show a consistent accuracy better than that are the ones that used a click track.

    6. Re:Down to the millisecond??? Dubious by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Yes - my reading of it is that if we have an external time source (the click track) we can keep time with that to very high precision, but if we're left to keep time on our own, we tend to drift all over the place.

  25. Well Duh! by tal_mud · · Score: 1

    Of course the same area tracks time and space. The space-time continuum is 4 dimensional. Would you expect a different brain region to track the X axis and one to track the Y axis? :-)

  26. Simple experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Put a brain scanner in the DMV office and determine which regions of the brain shut down, making it seem like you are stuck there forever. Mystery solved.

  27. Re:But how does a... by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    Republucan map time since they have no brain?

    They use bible passages. Less accurate but more satisfying.

  28. Re:I too was once homeless by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

    Can't believe I wasted my extra valuable time reading that..

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  29. I usually wake up a few minutes before the alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happens a couple of times per month. Example I'll set the alarm to 7:50 and I'll wake up on my own at about 7:46~ ish. I just feel the need to wake up at that moment and feel nervous if I try to sleep on. My alarm times vary, but still I regularly beat the alarm even on non-pattern times. I guess the only reason why I do this is because I hate being startled by the alarm clock.

    And I'm sure plenty of people here have woken up in a dark room and guessed the time down to ~15minutes error before.

  30. not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    space, time... spacetime

    Einstein was right, in more ways than one

    1. Re:not surprising by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      This isn't about the nature of time, it's about perception of it. I don't recall Einstein ever discussing the neurology of time perception....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  31. Re:I usually wake up a few minutes before the alar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exactly. set your microwave and sit down to watch tv while it's heating up. bet you get up to check it right before it beeps

  32. Re: But how does a... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with a hugbox?

    I can't imagine a Beowulf cluster of them, that's what.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  33. Re:I too was once homeless by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Can't believe I wasted my extra valuable time reading that..

    Ah, but if you RTFA, you'll find that what you were wasting was just extra valuable fourth-dimensional-mindspace....

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  34. Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just off the cuff, but maybe a combination of memory networks, the reticular cortex, and a bunch of sensors that have regular or circadian rhythms?

  35. even more weird by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...is our brain's ability to portray simultaneity.

    If you touch a person's toe and nose at the same time, the speed-of-travel for that signal and significantly different distances that signal travels SHOULD result in a noticeable lag between the two, but doesn't; even when blindfolded, a person feels them at the same time.

    How is this possible?

    At first glance, one might assume the brain is 'pausing' the nose-signal to wait for the toe-signal. But how does it know to DO this, when it doesn't know that a toe signal is even coming?
    The best theory I've heard so far is that EVERY sensory input is delayed for the amount of time it would take the furthest signal to reach the brain, and then assembled into a coherent stream-of-time order as if time-stamped (but AFAIK there's no trace of a time-stamp signal in nerve signals).

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:even more weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nerve impulses travel 200 mph (320 feet per second.) The nerve impulse to get from your toe to your spinal column takes less than 1/100th of a second. I am skeptical that humans can distinguish the difference in 1/100th of a second from touch.

    2. Re:even more weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The speed of light is 3 times 10 to the 8 meters per second. Therefore the time for an electron to travel one meter is quite small. I don't believe humans can detect a time lag of 10 to the minus 8 seconds.

    3. Re:even more weird by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      Science news seems to believe we can tell the difference of tens of milliseconds.

      https://www.sciencenews.org/ar...

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:even more weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize 10 milliseconds is the same as 1/100th of a second, right?

  36. Yellow by BradleyUffner · · Score: 3, Informative

    A driver can judge just how much time is left to run a yellow light

    Not many of the drivers that I've seen. Light turns red and 3 more cars go zipping through.

    1. Re:Yellow by lance_of_the_apes · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. +1

    2. Re:Yellow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't their misassessment of time that is the cause of this, but rather that their speed at which they approach the red light causes a Doppler blueshift making it look yellow.

  37. Re: But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US govt pays people en masse to write pro-liberal/commie messages on popular boards, in the hopes that the liberal way of thinking will rub off on the masses.

  38. Re:But how does a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go purple team. I like purple, and puppies. Orange team hates puppies, and America. Mauve team doesn't know they aren't a team.

  39. Hour wait for the next bus by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can't see how going without a watch entirely is practical when you have to catch a bus at a particular minute, and if you miss one, it's an hour wait for the next. Or did you already have a car and enough income to fuel and insure it by 18?

    1. Re:Hour wait for the next bus by bakes · · Score: 1

      Correct, I had a car that was cheap to buy and to run, and had a part-time job that was enough to cover it. If I needed the exact time, I was usually surrounded by people with watches OR by clocks on a wall, VCR, microwave oven, etc.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!