Slashdot Mirror


Our Hidden Neanderthal DNA May Increase Risk of Allergies, Depression (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit writes: Depressed? Your inner Neanderthal may be to blame. Modern humans met and mated with these archaic people in Europe or Asia about 50,000 years ago, and researchers have long suspected that genes picked up in these trysts might be shaping health and well-being today. Now, a study in the current issue of Science details their impact. It uses a powerful new method for scanning the electronic health records of 28,000 Americans to show that some Neanderthal gene variants today can raise the risk of depression, skin lesions, blood clots, and other disorders.

57 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Is there a greater risk of micropenis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can anyone tell me if there's also a greater risk of suffering from micropenis? I urgently need to know!

    1. Re:Is there a greater risk of micropenis? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I am 3.7% Neanderthal (top 99th percentile).

      Given that H.S.Sapiens and H. (S.) Neanderthalensis share 98.5% of the genetic material, it would be difficult to be more than 2.5%,or less than 98.5%, depending on how you see it.

      What you probably mean is that you have 3.7% of the genetic markers that have so far been identified as being inherited from Neanderthals. Which is a completely different thing from being 3.7% Neanderthal.

      I haven't tested my DNA, as there are large privacy concerns with the available testers (none I have found agree to destroying the test and all results except what they send you), but given that I have a large head, big joints, gap behind my wisdom teeth, and hail from where the largest concentration of Neanderthal-inherited DNA is, it wouldn't surprise me if it's up there.
      I'm okay with that - it's part of being human.

    2. Re:Is there a greater risk of micropenis? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'd love to have my DNA tested but, so far, I've not found anyone willing to do it and ensure my privacy is kept. No, you may not assign my DNA a number and throw it in with others without asking. If you ask, I'll say yes. But you may not do it without asking.

      That said, it's probably likely that my DNA has already made it out into a test somewhere. I'm sure it got anonymized and sold. You give a blood sample when you enlist. You give a blood sample when you skip a few years and then reenlist. The samples get frozen and stored after getting your blood-type, or so they were. I'm guessing they either grab DNA and run it from all of them, for ID purposes in case of trouble, or that they store them for when they might need to do so.

      I'm not so silly as to believe that they'd take my perfectly fine blood sample and throw it out. There wasn't much to do with it back then but they were working on it, it was 1986 when I came home. I mean, it's a perfectly good, preserved, sample and I'm betting they're not worried about room. I strongly suspect they've since run it through the machine and done what they could. I know that blood's not actually the best source of DNA but it works. I don't recall them taking any tissue samples? I wonder if they take tissue samples now? Note to self: Ask a friend. It's easy for 'em to swab a cheek.

      At any rate... Anyone else think of the Dr. Demento Show? I hope I'm not the only one... I don't remember who sang it?

      "I'm a Neanderthal boy, you're a Neanderthal girl,
      Let's make Neanderthal love, in this Neanderthal world."

      Hmm... I went and found you the song.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Where's Pope at? Heh... He'll get a kick out of that reference.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  2. Uuhg! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me Sad

    1. Re:Uuhg! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Me Sad

      Don't worry, you'll feel better after bashing a mammoth in the head with a large club. That always cheers me up.

    2. Re:Uuhg! by nytes · · Score: 1

      Me help you.

      *shoots Mr D in head with woolly mammoth bone*

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  3. How to handle unsanitary behavior by russotto · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Hey, cover your mouth when you sneeze, you Neandertal!"

    1. Re:How to handle unsanitary behavior by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 1

      Oh great, here come all the Denisovan fanbois!

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  4. what you are really concerned about by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Funny

    it increases your chance of unibrow!

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:what you are really concerned about by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      increases your chance of unibrow

      I don't have that problem because I run Winbrow instead.

    2. Re:what you are really concerned about by antdude · · Score: 1

      So, my old green Chinese dragon is from Netherland.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  5. Re:Neandertal, not Neanderthal by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Fail, you fat boche bastard...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Re:Neandertal, not Neanderthal by bondsbw · · Score: 1

    Indeed, it is too late to fix your mistake.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  7. Re:Neandertal, not Neanderthal by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes "h" please.

    It's not a mistake. The word was coined before the spelling of "thal" (valley) was changed to "tal."

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  8. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It's more than that. It's not just food hysteria, there are people who do get incredibly sick from certain foods. Peanut allergies, anyone? These people don't imagine swelling up and clogging their wind pipes.

    Until recently, this kind of sickness was unheard of in Europe. There was no such thing as a peanut allergy. Now we got that, too.

    We get sicker and sicker. And I wonder why. What is it that lets our bodies go apeshit over food?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:RACISTS! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    So which candidate is the Neanderthal Caucus going to endorse . . . Bernie or Hillary . . . ?

    Trump, Busch, Cruz, Kasich, Rubio . . . ?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  10. Re:RACISTS! by gtall · · Score: 1

    Well...there are the Neanderthal babes...furry little sex kittens that they are.

  11. Robosexuality by m2shariy · · Score: 1

    Do not repeat the old mistakes, bots!

  12. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by alzoron · · Score: 1

    There's also the fact that until relatively recently people that were deathly allergic to things like peanuts either never had the opportunity to eat peanuts or typically died pretty early due to medical knowledge not being as advanced as it is now.

  13. Re:RACISTS! by gtall · · Score: 1

    Cruz, just listen to his campaigngasms...he's going to smote this, carpet bomb that, etc....he's a perfect fit. And Trump bores them.

  14. Re:Neandertal, not Neanderthal by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    I did read the article. It's TFS that has the wrong spelling.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  15. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Until recently there were no carefully certified allergy-safe foods, and no ambulances to rush people to the non-existent emergency room where there were no medical procedures to help. People with peanut allergies probably died quickly as children.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  16. Re:Neandertal, not Neanderthal by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Informative

    The H is indeed a mistake. The link states clearly that the word originates from the German place Neandertal.

    No, it doesn't. The link states that "Tal" used to be spelled "Thal" before the modern German spelling reform, which happened roughly 100 years ago. Since the word was coined in the mid-1800s, it originally had "Thal" in German too.

    This got corrupted when used in English long ago and the H was added. The result is eternal confusion about the spelling.

    No -- the English used the proper German spelling at the time the word entered English. Then the Germans decided to change their spelling of the word.

    Additionally, the German word (with or without "h") was ALWAYS pronounced "tal," as most cases of "th" are in German. (See English words like "Thomas" pronounced "tomas" as well.)

  17. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by solartear · · Score: 2

    Peanuts were found in the new world, and do not grow in Europe, so there would be no sickness from them until they were heavily imported after the Americas were discovered. After being introduced, many people may have died without it being diagnosed as "peanut allergy". Only recently have we gotten a lot better about keeping people alive who would have quickly died 1 or 2 hundred years ago.

    Though I did read an article recently about babies not being exposed to enough 'things' was causing them to be more vulnerable to related things as they grew older, including peanut products.

  18. Neandertal or hybrid issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are the issues due to neandertal genes or due to two human races mixing together? If we look at cattle, a lot of selective breeding has been done and a lot of races have been created. It turns out that some races have race specific issues. However mixing two races can create new problems not present in any of the parent races. For some reason genes aren't always 50% abilities from each parent, but rather effects of combos.

    Somehow I don't think the neandertals living during the ice age were prone to blood clots. The simple reason is that they survived for like 300k years in those conditions, which mean they could not have been fragile. As the arms and legs cools down, the risk of blood clots increase, which mean being prone to those sounds quite bad in a cold environment. Pure speculation could be that neandertals had genes to protect them against restricted blood flow. If so, a blood clot would then not be a major issue to them and a single gene increasing the risk wouldn't be a fatal gene. However with 1-4% (article mentions 1.5% average, not 1-4% spread) it leaves the majority of neandertal genes lost and this gamble could provide us with increased risk, but not the protection.

    I don't really like the headline. It smells a bit like "people without neandertal genes are better". Read another article and you can make the headline "people with neandertal genes are better". There is research indicating that modern humans wouldn't have survived in Europe without a specific neandertal gene. Something about ensuring survival to some European disease, food or some other environmental danger. Research into genes and their effects is an interesting field of research and yeah people with different genes aren't 100% alike. Still going down the path of saying that one group is genetically better than some other group of people seems a bit dangerous to me, particularly since the understanding of genes is just the tip of the iceberg and there is no way to make such conclusions.

    1. Re:Neandertal or hybrid issues by KGIII · · Score: 1

      From what little I know, which is not much, Neanderthal is not what I'd call "fragile." All of my "expertise" comes from documentaries. PBS had a great one, NOVA, called something like, "Where did we Come From." It was a five part series and traced the various people back and tried to find out the paths they took and how we got to be where we are today - it was pretty good.

      At any rate, the Neanderthal didn't really go extinct. I mean, yeah, there are none left but there's probably some genetic material left in you. Humans and Neanderthal had a distant ancestor that they shared. The paths diverged and Neanderthal was the first to evolve into a higher form (for lack of a better word). We humans were on a different track and later we bumped into each other, probably in Europe, and had enough genetic material to successfully mate.

      For whatever reason, and we do not know why, the Neanderthal itself ceased to exist - it's speculated that it was neither overpopulation, resource use, or violence. They simply don't know - it may have been a specific pathogen that only affected them but not humans or impacted humans at a lesser rate - some immunity might be there today, hidden dormant in our genetic material.

      But, the Neanderthal and the Human had mated and produced offspring. So, really... It's kind of true that there are no more Neanderthals left and that means we can call them extinct but there are still plenty of them walking around - at least if you get a bunch of humans and mash 'em up in a blender or something. That's how it works, right? I don't know if extinct is the right word for it?

      At any rate, they were much, much thicker and more robust than we are. If you look at their bones, they're huge. If you ever see the guys from Iceland at the Tough Man competitions, they were built a bit like them but probably a bit more broad than most of those guys. They were HUGE. They had some neat pictures of their bones and our bones, in a side by side picture, and it was impressive how huge they were. They did a CGI overlay of them (I think that's the same series) and it's amazing how much larger they were. They weren't all that much taller, necessarily, but they were much more broad and thicker. I sometimes wonder if they were what led to some of the "giant" tales that are common across the globe. Maybe not them while they were alive but it's not unlikely that someone uncovered their bones back then and figured out that they were very similar and very large.

      I forget the exact numbers they gave but they had an estimated strength based on mass, density, muscle insert and origin markings on the bone, leverage, etc... They concluded that they were probably able to lift and carry large amounts of weight and were insanely strong. They've also concluded that speech, as we know it, was likely impossible for them but that they were likely rather intelligent.

      But, fragile is not a word that I'd use to describe them. Of course, I'm not an expert and my knowledge comes from documentaries watched for amusement and not for educational purposes.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Neandertal or hybrid issues by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That must have made for some interesting study material. My only experience/education is from having a friend who's an Archaeologist, the little bit covered in various courses, and documentaries. I've always thought it would make a very fun field to study. There's some interesting ways to draw connections between the societies and interactions then and now.

      I often will just let the recommended/next options pick my documentaries for me. (I pretty much only watch documentaries, as a general rule I'm not really interested in other stuff.) So, I enjoy it when I come across things that aren't what I'd have typically considered watching. That's how I ended up with the NOVA series and I really enjoyed it. I'm pretty sure I watched it on YouTube and I was probably logged in at the time. That means I can probably go through my history and find it -- if you're actually curious or haven't seen it. I think it's five or six episodes long and is about a lot more than just the Neanderthal.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  19. I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you are so superior, why do you feel the need to mock?

    When I see a developmentally-disabled person bagging groceries at the super market, I don't start insulting them. I don't go posting on forums about how horrible and inferior they are. At most I just reflect that they are filling an economic need that suits them.

    I am pretty sure you do the same. But why only mock black people, and not developmentally-disabled people? My best guess is its because you aren't assured of your superiority over blacks, thus making the possibility of their equality a threat to your fragile ego.

    Your behavior is indicative of ignorance and an inferiority complex. This doesn't exactly make you a shining example of the group to which you so proudly claim membership.

  20. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps Neanderthal types just need more sleep. You know the further north you go the longer the nights are and hence evolutionary adoption to longer sleep periods. Not to forget, this whole work to make other people richer ethic is still pretty new evolutionary speaking, this versus hunting the morning for a bit, eating a bunch, snoozing a bit futzing about a bit with you stone tools and weapons in the afternoon, chatting around the fire in the early evening than nookie and sleep pretty early in the night. Wake up with the birds (pre-dawn ie bright sky sun still beyond horizon), rinse, well, no rinse unless the is a pool nearby and repeat, maybe much on some leftovers first, something like a 2 to 4 hour work day. Then a bunch of psychos got greedy and demanded the rest do their work as well and build edifices to worship their superiority because that will publicly torture you to death 'er' 'no wait because they were selected by the Gods, yeah that's right, they were the Gods chosen, so you should worship them and call them royalty. Perhaps it is not the genes on their own as much as those people did not evolve to become working in poverty slaves and that is an unhealthy life style and super fucking depressing.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  21. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That has probably to do with the fact that in the US most people consume processed foods almost exclusively.
    And thanks to radical, free capitalism there are almost no regulations on what kind of shit to put in there, so your food is stuffed with stabilizers, preservatives, flavors, colorants, antibiotics, emulsifying agents, sugar, salt, caffeine, and cojones extract of mutant cows from outer space.

    So once your eat normal food from mother nature, your immune system goes bonkers. If it doesn't contain any of those chemicals you're used to, it must be poison!

  22. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    It's more than that. It's not just food hysteria, there are people who do get incredibly sick from certain foods. Peanut allergies, anyone? These people don't imagine swelling up and clogging their wind pipes.

    Until recently, this kind of sickness was unheard of in Europe. There was no such thing as a peanut allergy. Now we got that, too.

    We get sicker and sicker. And I wonder why. What is it that lets our bodies go apeshit over food?

    My cousin and his father(uncle via marriage) both have severe(anaphylactic) peanut allergies. the son was born in 1968. the father in the 40's.
    I was born in the 70's and i have a severe(anaphylactic) reaction to sheep meat. My mother severe reaction to strawberries... i know plenty of other people with them too, all from my age range but also older and younger.

  23. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "Example: In some cultures, insects are a tasty snack. In America, "ZOMG, time to sue someone a cricket is in my soup!"
    I have tried these, and they're actually pretty good. Also carried at Whole Paycheck.

    http://smile.amazon.com/Chapul...

  24. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    I suspect the "An idle immune system is the Devil's workshop" theory. All this crazy-clean germicidal-everything living in a Lysol bubble has left our immune systems with nothing to do but cultivate paranoia.

  25. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    This is quite humorous! Americans eat raw meat. The dish you describe we call "Steak Tartare" - so it appears French attribute raw beef to Americans and Americans attribute it to the french.

    And, what we call French fries are Belgian, so I am told.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  26. Re:I fail to understand where these people think h by turbidostato · · Score: 1

    "so Neandertals are part of our evolution"

    No, they aren't.

    "not a separate evolutionary path."

    Yes, they are.

    Review your sources.

  27. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by kbahey · · Score: 1

    You are basically right, but you made the jump too fast in the timeline ...

    Theory has it that hunters and gatherers were egalitarians, with each member doing his share, and no real hierarchy. The work day was like you said.

    But then, humans moved from hunting/gathering subsistence, to farming. Farming led to villages, and villages led to towns, and towns led to a division of labor, and that led to social stratification, with the priests and kings at the top, aristocracy next, merchants next, and then the laborers ...

    And that is what led to feudalism, and now the same is happening with corporatism.

  28. Up-Sides? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    There may be some upsides to their DNA that we don't yet know about. Diseases and extreme problems are better understood because that's what medical experts are expected to focus on. But there could also be some nice traits we picked up from them such that they counter the negative traits enough to survive in our genome.

    And the down-sides of them may only show up in some people. That is, they depend on combinations of other genes to manifest themselves.

  29. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Erh... with "recently" I mean "until the last decade or two", not "until the last century or two".

    The older ones here might remember that we could tell the signs of allergies even in the last century.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    What keeps me happy is that I do remember from history class how feudalism was dealt with in the end.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by arth1 · · Score: 1

    My cousin and his father(uncle via marriage)

    This must be in the Appalachians.

  32. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Add duck and dawn to that, which is longer as well, you get very short nights.

    On the other hand, you get very long ducks.

     

  33. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by arth1 · · Score: 1

    This is quite humorous! Americans eat raw meat.

    Yes, but only beef. Never pork, lamb, goat, horse or any other meats. Certainly not poultry, as the US seems to be able to keep salmonella out of their poultry production. (Which is why Spaghetti Carbonara is almost never made with raw eggs in the US, and don't get me started on the atrocity called egg nogg over here),
    And most Americans would never venture past beef, pork, chicken and turkey anyhow. Sometimes fish, if it's breaded thickly enough, fried, and with enough lemon on it that you couldn't tell it from tofu.

  34. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by whoever57 · · Score: 2

    Perhaps Neanderthal types just need more sleep. You know the further north you go the longer the nights are

    *I* know no such thing. I know that the nights are longer in Winter, but *shorter* in Summer.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  35. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    nope ,Scotland

  36. Re:So basically by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    No but Africans are far more genetically diverse, so you can't generalise as easily about them as a group. That diversity just implies a wider spread of capabilities, if anything at all, and it says nothing about the reproductive fitness value of any given characteristic.

    As far as evolution is concerned only fecundity matters, and everything above your hips is there acting in a support role to your gonads.

  37. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    You realize that today even the poorest of the poor live like kings compared to Neanderthals? What were gay rights like under Neanderthal rule? How about women's liberation? Yeah, that's what I thought. Another left-wing fanatic who who won't change his mind and won't change the subject.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  38. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Or is our diagnostics getting better and we've more variety than we've had in the past?

    I'm still scrolling down through the thread. I wonder if anyone will be *seriously* blaming inoculations, fluoride, or antibiotics. I'd not be surprised.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  39. Re:Idle hands by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I'd hoped I'd find you in this thread.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Given your prior links, I'd be surprised if you didn't know the song. For the rest, give it a click. It's definitely on-topic. I posted at the top of the thread and mentioned that it'd be good if Pope could see it. So, if you didn't click it the first time - there it is again.

    Turn the volume up loud and get groovy. Get down with your bad selves! Dance and wave your hands around and gyrate those hips like the Summer of Love has ended and you're desperate to keep it alive! Dance like you've eaten the brown acid. Get down with your partner or get down with yourself. If all you got is a cat? Get down with that.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  40. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Is that anything like Saigon beef salad or Beef Carpacio?

    Americans eat raw beef from a variety of cuisines.

    The American version is 'Steak, extra rare.' Which basically means 'Heat the meat to the body temperature of a live cow, then shine a flashlight on both sides and call it cooked'.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  41. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Any single egg has small chances of having Salmonella. It's only at industrial scale, when they are cracking a gross of eggs at a time to make stuff that it's a problem. Especially as that sauce is sure to sit. Even there you weren't likely to get sick.

    Not sure about where you live, so YMMV.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  42. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    This is why peanuts warns that it contains nuts

    Except peanuts aren't nuts. From a scientific POV the archaic term "goober peas" is more accurate.

    Lots of things have warnings that they may contain nuts. This is due to potential cross-contamination during processing.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  43. Re:Neandertal, not Neanderthal by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    What it clearly states is that either spelling is permissible, so just fuck off.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  44. Re:Neandertal, not Neanderthal by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, "Neandertal" has a tiny little bit of "Homo sapiens" in him.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  45. Which way gene flow? by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    genes picked up in these trysts

    I've recently read a couple of more popular articles on Neanderthals (including on Wikipedia). All seem to allude that there was some happy-go-lucky "free love" get-togethers, or intermarriage, with the "other" neighbors way back when.

    The Wikipedia article however also states: "While modern humans share some nuclear DNA with the extinct Neanderthals, the two species do not share any mitochondrial DNA,[54] which in primates is always maternally transmitted."

    Or, translated to more modern hominid: The genetics indicate that H. sapiens do not have female H. neanderthalensis ancestors, only male ones.

    I wasn't there to know exactly what happened, but it does narrow the possibilities a bit, doesn't it...

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  46. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    Also once you stop eating raw meat and develop sanitary sewers, parasitism goes down. This is mostly good, but parasites tend to release immunosuppressants. So, no worms chewing your organs, but your immune system is more active and cranky than the wild-type that you evolved with would have ended up at with all the worms. So you see more auto-immune disorders than the folks eating raw chickens standing in pig excrement. On the plus side you get to live long enough to die of cancer instead of infection.

  47. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    Long duck dawn?*

    Darn it, now I've got to go watch a John Hughes movie.

    *Yeah, I know that's not *quite* how he put it.

  48. Re:Never seen so many allergies in people by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Now that is a whole other question. Do we or do we not have the right to live like free Neanderthals, to live off the land as we choose and see fit. So royalty gets to choose and well, the rest of us either get killed or put in a cage should we attempt to engage in what is our natural born right. I mean you really do get the difference don't you or do you just consider the rest of us animals and you are the only true person. You seemed to have confused a neutral some what satirical anarchistic libertarian statement with something else based around your own personal greed.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen