Slashdot Mirror


Mattel Unveils $300 3D Printer (computerworld.com)

Lucas123 writes: Perhaps in an attempt to get out ahead of the consumer 3D printing market, which has allowed popular toys such as Legos to be replicated, Mattel today announced it would begin shipping its $300 fused filament fabricator machine in October. Mattel's ThingMaker at-home toy-making device, reinvents the company's iconic 1960s toy by the same name. The new ThingMaker allows users to upload design files via Mattel's proprietary Design App, which works on Android or iOS devices. The 3D printer can then print single-part toys or print hundreds of different parts to be assembled into toys using ball-and-socket joints. Mattel's ThingMaker Design App is based on Autodesk's Spark, an open 3D printing platform that provides extensible APIs for each stage of the 3D printing workflow. Because it's based on an open architecture, the ThingMaker Design App also works with other 3D printers; it is available now and free to download for iOS and Android devices.

19 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. The price point is great by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Funny
    But being able to refer to the machine as a fused filament fabricator?

    Priceless.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  2. Mattel were leaders in cheap technology before... by lhaeh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Way back in the day, they came out with the Barbie Digital Camera. It was the cheapest digital camera on the market by far. Many people who had no interest in Barbie bought them. It was $79 when most cameras were $300+, they got the price down by, among other things, using damaged DRAM chips.

    http://www.superkids.com/aweb/...

  3. Question. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much would it cost to print a RealDoll-type sex toy on one of these?
    I'm asking for a friend.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Question. by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Funny

      How much would it cost to print a RealDoll-type sex toy on one of these? I'm asking for a friend.

      OK, printing a sex doll will cost a lot...
      Printing a friend?
      Priceless!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  4. Re: a good way to spend 300$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, it can, but you need to pay the 30 million dollar licensing fee.

  5. The original ThingMaker was AWESOME. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At least, it was for a six-year-old kid. It fell victim to the "maybe we shouldn't have kids handling 400-degree hot molds" mindset, with an added dose of "maybe all those volatile organic fumes aren't the greatest thing for your kid to be huffing".

    Let's hope the new one is worth of the name.

  6. Fumes by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Aren't the fumes from these things still kinda dangerous? I'm just saying in not 100% confident parents can be trusted to use them in a well ventilated place

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  7. Battery covers. by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can I print replacement battery covers with it? That would be pretty useful. The finish looks pretty good I wonder if the tolerances are good enough for the clips to work.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:Battery covers. by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can I print replacement battery covers with it? That would be pretty useful. The finish looks pretty good I wonder if the tolerances are good enough for the clips to work.

      I've thought about this too. There are a lot of little things around the house that might be worth printing (or ordering printed from a "kinkos" type service). The biggest problem is that you need a 3d model of it before you can print it. Even if you have a 2nd one to copy, the 3d scanners aren't really good enough to do it without post editing. It would be great if manufacturers let you download battery cover 3d files like you can download printer drivers but I don't see that happening anytime soon.

  8. Some observations by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people will point out the many problems with this system, but from an initial glance(*):

    1) The filament spools are not chipped. You can get filament from other vendors and rewind them on your spools. Chances are, other vendors will notice this and start selling ThingMaker spools.
    2) The FAQ states that if you don't have a printer, there are many places that will print parts for you. I assume this means that the output format *isn't* proprietary, possibly a bog-standard stl file that you can have printed anywhere.

    If, and this is a big if, the heads can be easily replaced, then this could be quite an exciting development in 3d printing. As hackers, we'll be able to get cheap used 3d ThingMakers off of eBay for decades.

    (*) Please correct me if any of these are wrong

    1. Re:Some observations by c · · Score: 2

      2) The FAQ states that if you don't have a printer, there are many places that will print parts for you. I assume this means that the output format *isn't* proprietary, possibly a bog-standard stl file that you can have printed anywhere.

      Apparently the software is just a branded Autodesk Tinkerplay. Surprisingly enough, Autodesk seems to be serious about consumer-level 3D printing and they seem to get that proprietary is pretty much a non-starter at the moment.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  9. Print Your Own Chokables. by zenlessyank · · Score: 2

    Lawsuits in 3...2...1

  10. Re:$300 bucks? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    makerbot 5th gen mini (1k abouts) is a piece of shit.

    300 gets you a kit nowadays. a 300 bucks kit is better than 5th gen makerbots.. not better than last gen makerbots though. for under 1k you can get a clones of makerbot replicator 1/2 that are pretty decent(read: more reliable than 5th gen).

    and now theres plenty of offerings in the 350-1000 dollars range. they're all pretty much based on same parts and tech though, which isn't really that bad since it means cheap parts for service.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  11. Ken by FrankDrebin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like Ken is finally gonna get some junk.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  12. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have a six figure priced printer in the shop where I work, which is actual now several years old, and it can easily make the tolerances for Lego bricks

    The tolerances for Lego are at only 2 microns. Still think it "easily" makes it? Considering the printer you describe is a few years old, I'd be surprised if it is even within an order of magnitude of that tolerance. I know of absolutely no 3d printer, at any price, that can reliably create parts at the levels of precision that can be ordinarily met with injection molding.

  13. Wrong by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    which has allowed popular toys such as Legos to be replicated

    Bzzzt, WRONG!!!!

    There is no such thing as Legos, you buffoon.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen that reported as the mold tolerance, which is not the same as the plastic tolerance which is more on the order of 10-20 microns. Some engineers at my work place got an argument about this once, and bought a small pack of Lego bricks and it is closer to 50 microns for wall thickness and larger for some of the big dimensions (as in the full range of values, not the standard deviation). This makes sense, because if they need 2 micron accuracy to work over all dimensions, pieces warmed up by your hand would not fit ones at room temperature.

    20-40 micron printing is pretty common now, and even for several years with laser sintering. Stratasys has had 16 micron resolution commercially available since at least 2011-2012ish. One of the advertised uses now for sintered metal is for making inserts to be used in injection molding. Places that need higher precision still have to make their own instead of using off the shelf equipment, but research printers have been doing 10 micron or smaller precision for nearly 15 years now. When we have some thing with a very small feature size, on the order of 30-50 microns, we have a connection with with a university team that will rent out use of their micro laser sintering setup for occasional runs. Although it only has a 2x2x1 cm working volume, unlike the much larger 16 micron setups.

  15. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by mark-t · · Score: 2

    if they need 2 micron accuracy to work over all dimensions, pieces warmed up by your hand would not fit ones at room temperature.

    First of all, ABS plastic such as what is used for Lego isn't affected that much by temperature change at the scales that things like Lego are made, in general the difference in size for that tiny a temperature change would be about on the order of a fraction of a micron. Secondly, the expansion or contraction for larger temperature changes could indeed pose a problem for some Lego pieces to fit together if they were made of something other than ABS. A Lego piece taken out of a freezer that has been there for some time, for instance, may have a difficult time fitting room temperature pieces because the former has become more rigid, and connectivity will certainly be affected by the temperature variance.

  16. Re:No specs? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

    Which 3D printer did you buy for only $350 that can do 15 microns on the X and Y and 50 microns on the Z?