Slashdot Mirror


NASA's Search For Astronauts Yields a Deluge of Applicants

NASA, notes Ars Technica, has just produced a bumper crop of applicants for the coveted job of astronaut. 18,300 would-be astronauts applied to be part of the 2017 hiring class. It would be good to keep a backup job in mind, though: NASA's astronaut applications have surged even as its flight opportunities have fallen by about 90 percent. Back in the early 2000s during the peak of the space shuttle program, NASA had more than 150 active astronauts. That's because the shuttle, with six to seven launches a year, afforded 40 to 50 annual flights into space. The number of active astronauts is now about one-third of that peak due to the shuttle's retirement in 2011. With no Shuttle, and only one real destination (the International Space Station), those 18,300 astronauts will be whittled down to 8-14 candidates.

37 comments

  1. Fix unicode already! by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An increasing number of submissions lately have had text copy-pasted right out of the article, only to get mangled by Slashdot's inability to cope with UTF8.

    It's 2015, can Slashdot please join the 21st century already?

    1. Re:Fix unicode already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You scream into nothingness. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

    2. Re:Fix unicode already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In some places, it's even 2016. What happened, off your meds?

    3. Re:Fix unicode already! by whipslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Gah. Fixed the story. Unicode will be supported soon.

    4. Re: Fix unicode already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! The new Slashdot team is awesome. Just ignore the abuse.

    5. Re:Fix unicode already! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Right you are. I didn't notice the typo

    6. Re:Fix unicode already! by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      " ' , 21 ."

      Filter error: Your comment looks too much like ascii art.

      uh huh... OK /. if you say so. http://qaz.wtf/u/convert.cgi?t....

    7. Re: Fix unicode already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the other guy. You all suck shit. Lick my asshole, bitch boy. It's not like you sad fucks are doing anything more productive.

    8. Re:Fix unicode already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gah. Fixed the story. Unicode will be supported soon.

      Yeah right... and you will also undo the beta-by-stealth changes?

      Judging by today's stories, I think Slashdot is destined to fold. Good purchase Logan.

    9. Re:Fix unicode already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea - stop blindly copy-pasting shit and proofread your submissions to insure they are free of invalid characters.

    10. Re:Fix unicode already! by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Thanks, and thanks for keeping an eye on these and other issues.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    11. Re:Fix unicode already! by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's being posted to a site with potentially hundreds of thousands of eyes looking at it. Why not give it a quick fucking read first?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  2. Wowâ(TM)zers by zamboni1138 · · Score: 2

    Thatâ(TM)s a pretty amazing turn-out. Iâ(TM)m interested to see how they plan to use this new crop of star voyagerâ(TM)s.

    Iâ(TM)ll try not to get my hopes up given our current financial situation. But maybe theyâ(TM)ll be able to figure something out.

    1. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny; I've become so accustomed to shitty unicode support that I rarely notice problems like this. My brain just screens out the junk and I see the word that was meant, unless I stop and really look at it.

    2. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's funny; I've become so accustomed to shitty unicode support that I rarely notice problems like this. My brain just screens out the junk and I see the word that was meant, unless I stop and really look at it.

      All you see now is blonde, brunette, redhead?

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by whipslash · · Score: 1

      A few more weeks and we should have it taken care of. Story fixed.

    4. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      A few more weeks and we should have it taken care of. Story fixed.

      You do that and I'm gonna plant a big wet kiss on your forehead, you sexy Slashdot overlord you.

      http://www.tvworthwatching.com...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm starting to feel like that at work. I must have dozens of attributes, hundreds of code values memorized by now without really trying to, I work so much with XML and the data tables where I don't have the labels - there are of course documentation and views for that - that I for the most part don't need them anymore. I know what code 22 here, code 3 there, code 6 in this field and code 4 in that field means. It actually tends to freak people out that I don't need to look it up...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re: Wowâ(TM)zers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you a fag?

    7. Re: Wowâ(TM)zers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      What are you a fag?

      No, I'm a unicode whore.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      By the time they finish training, the only thing they will be able to ride in will be the vomit commit. No space station, no space shuttle, no orion, no moon base, no mars base. Maybe China is hiring.

  3. all hoping to be chosen by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    as immigrant workers

  4. Figure is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they got 18,300 applications but probably 2% are baseline qualified, and even fewer are competitive. NASA will now weed out (i.e. click "delete") all the jack off applicants.

    1. Re:Figure is misleading by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 2

      probably 2% are baseline qualified

      The figure is closer to 100%. That 18,000 number sounds suspiciously close to the number of humans whom, if properly rendered reduced and freeze-dried, would comprise a perfect nutritional supplement for a long term Mars Mission and colony. Everybody gets to go into space! It's a win.

      SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  5. So I have a 1 in a 1000 change of getting in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like those odds. Qualified? I am the best candicate.

  6. Bigelow Aerospace by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, if we have multiple human launchers, then Bigelow will be up there with their space station alpha that holds 12 - 18. NASA will no doubt want to take some of the slots so that they can train more ppl for going to deep space, moon, and mars.
    But, where this will REALLY matter, is that Bigelow wants to put a base on the moon around 2020-2022. NASA will likely take most of the slots for that.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. Fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    18,300 jackoffs hoping to suck at the tear of Goblowme's bloated gummint cow. Go get a real job you damn bums.

    1. Re:Fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if only the true job creators weren't slaving under the oppressive government, skilled workers wouldn't have to resort to such measures.

      THANKS OBAMA!

  8. Yeah good luck with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their plan seems to be to form a giant human pyramid scheme to get to Mars.

  9. Next: search for a purpose by slashping · · Score: 1

    NASA's next job will be to figure out a useful purpose for astronauts. Maybe they can show on camera how they drink water in microgravity ? Or see how plants grow ?

    1. Re:Next: search for a purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed. Because NASA's publicity is so incredibly stupid like you describe. The stuff on NASAtv is so incredibly unintellectual and quite obviously government-run (read: still doing things the way they did them 60 years ago). All the comparisons to football fields. All the stupid "so what's your new years resolution". I like how the current set of astronauts is like "I don't do that". Now if we can get them to stop talking about their favorite football team, wearing Jerseys, and thanking Jeebus.

      OTOH. They are kind of forced into this, stupid 1950's hoop-jumping because that's the only way the Republicans in congress will allow any funding at all. You MUST worship football and jeebus like they do, or your scientific study has no merit. In this sense, your comment is part of the problem. People focusing on stupid stuff instead of the REAL SCIENCE that is being done on that amazing orbiting LABORATORY. Because that's what it is. They study science up there. Unfortunately, most of it is proprietary. Even the government funded stuff. They license the patents to privileged cronys instead of just giving the knowledge to the world (or the USA citizens that paid for it). This is what you should ridicule. This is what you should attack. Not that their mission is pointless. It is not.

    2. Re:Next: search for a purpose by slashping · · Score: 1

      They license the patents to privileged cronys instead of just giving the knowledge to the world

      You realize that in order to get a patent, you have to give the knowledge to the world ? So, what useful science has come out of this orbiting laboratory ?

    3. Re:Next: search for a purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that in order to get a patent, you have to give the knowledge to the world ?

      You are incredibly naive if you believe that old lie. Patents almost never contain any real information. You should also know that patents have never once helped an inventor assert their rights. They have only ever been used by rich people (who don't invent) to control exclusive business rights over stuff they ordinarily wouldn't (because they aren't inventors). The rest is just collateral damage.

      NASA patents: http://technology.nasa.gov/patents
      You'll find on that site some bullshit about how small business can make use of this technology. You know how people would REALLY be able to make use of it? If the data was posted on an open website, and a press release made it's way to slashdot about a cool new open source technology. No such thing has happened.

  10. Yeah, but ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... most of them are Kerbals applying via the H-1B program.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  11. It never was easy to become an astronaut by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Though it seems they are seeking different type than before who were mostly test pilots (know of developmental programs, can deal with high stress emergency situations, cleared for security, used to guvmint bureaucracies). These days much of spaceflight time is transit (constant on orbit and hopefully some time will be long transit time from earth some place in space). There isn't a lot of fast paced dynamic situations i.e. in one week you go from launch to TLI, lunar orbit, land, walk around, take off, lunar orbit, TEI, and high speed re-entry. Of course need to have someone who can stay level-headed in case of serious emergencies in ISS, which are rare (they had a few mishaps on Mir).

    Years ago I read in a article where candidates go through final interviews in front of a panel. Much of discussion on various developmental and research programs they worked on. Then someone in panel asks the $10,000 question, "So, why do you want to be an astronaut?" This question typically floors almost all the candidates. But one answered, "Uh, my dad was an astronaut, my grand-dad was an astronaut, it just runs in the family." He was chosen.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  12. Just as long as kids don't dream of playing sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it funny that we try to dissuade kids of the notion that they'll grow up to be professional football players in the NFL because the chances of that happening are so low. But we apparently don't apply the same logic to astronauts despite the fact that the odds are even worse.