Slashdot Mirror


NASA's Search For Astronauts Yields a Deluge of Applicants

NASA, notes Ars Technica, has just produced a bumper crop of applicants for the coveted job of astronaut. 18,300 would-be astronauts applied to be part of the 2017 hiring class. It would be good to keep a backup job in mind, though: NASA's astronaut applications have surged even as its flight opportunities have fallen by about 90 percent. Back in the early 2000s during the peak of the space shuttle program, NASA had more than 150 active astronauts. That's because the shuttle, with six to seven launches a year, afforded 40 to 50 annual flights into space. The number of active astronauts is now about one-third of that peak due to the shuttle's retirement in 2011. With no Shuttle, and only one real destination (the International Space Station), those 18,300 astronauts will be whittled down to 8-14 candidates.

22 of 37 comments (clear)

  1. Fix unicode already! by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An increasing number of submissions lately have had text copy-pasted right out of the article, only to get mangled by Slashdot's inability to cope with UTF8.

    It's 2015, can Slashdot please join the 21st century already?

    1. Re:Fix unicode already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In some places, it's even 2016. What happened, off your meds?

    2. Re:Fix unicode already! by whipslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Gah. Fixed the story. Unicode will be supported soon.

    3. Re:Fix unicode already! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Right you are. I didn't notice the typo

    4. Re:Fix unicode already! by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      " ' , 21 ."

      Filter error: Your comment looks too much like ascii art.

      uh huh... OK /. if you say so. http://qaz.wtf/u/convert.cgi?t....

    5. Re:Fix unicode already! by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Thanks, and thanks for keeping an eye on these and other issues.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    6. Re:Fix unicode already! by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's being posted to a site with potentially hundreds of thousands of eyes looking at it. Why not give it a quick fucking read first?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  2. Wowâ(TM)zers by zamboni1138 · · Score: 2

    Thatâ(TM)s a pretty amazing turn-out. Iâ(TM)m interested to see how they plan to use this new crop of star voyagerâ(TM)s.

    Iâ(TM)ll try not to get my hopes up given our current financial situation. But maybe theyâ(TM)ll be able to figure something out.

    1. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's funny; I've become so accustomed to shitty unicode support that I rarely notice problems like this. My brain just screens out the junk and I see the word that was meant, unless I stop and really look at it.

      All you see now is blonde, brunette, redhead?

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by whipslash · · Score: 1

      A few more weeks and we should have it taken care of. Story fixed.

    3. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      A few more weeks and we should have it taken care of. Story fixed.

      You do that and I'm gonna plant a big wet kiss on your forehead, you sexy Slashdot overlord you.

      http://www.tvworthwatching.com...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm starting to feel like that at work. I must have dozens of attributes, hundreds of code values memorized by now without really trying to, I work so much with XML and the data tables where I don't have the labels - there are of course documentation and views for that - that I for the most part don't need them anymore. I know what code 22 here, code 3 there, code 6 in this field and code 4 in that field means. It actually tends to freak people out that I don't need to look it up...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re: Wowâ(TM)zers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you a fag?

    6. Re: Wowâ(TM)zers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      What are you a fag?

      No, I'm a unicode whore.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Wowâ(TM)zers by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      By the time they finish training, the only thing they will be able to ride in will be the vomit commit. No space station, no space shuttle, no orion, no moon base, no mars base. Maybe China is hiring.

  3. all hoping to be chosen by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    as immigrant workers

  4. Bigelow Aerospace by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, if we have multiple human launchers, then Bigelow will be up there with their space station alpha that holds 12 - 18. NASA will no doubt want to take some of the slots so that they can train more ppl for going to deep space, moon, and mars.
    But, where this will REALLY matter, is that Bigelow wants to put a base on the moon around 2020-2022. NASA will likely take most of the slots for that.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  5. Next: search for a purpose by slashping · · Score: 1

    NASA's next job will be to figure out a useful purpose for astronauts. Maybe they can show on camera how they drink water in microgravity ? Or see how plants grow ?

    1. Re:Next: search for a purpose by slashping · · Score: 1

      They license the patents to privileged cronys instead of just giving the knowledge to the world

      You realize that in order to get a patent, you have to give the knowledge to the world ? So, what useful science has come out of this orbiting laboratory ?

  6. Re:Figure is misleading by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 2

    probably 2% are baseline qualified

    The figure is closer to 100%. That 18,000 number sounds suspiciously close to the number of humans whom, if properly rendered reduced and freeze-dried, would comprise a perfect nutritional supplement for a long term Mars Mission and colony. Everybody gets to go into space! It's a win.

    SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  7. Yeah, but ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... most of them are Kerbals applying via the H-1B program.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  8. It never was easy to become an astronaut by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Though it seems they are seeking different type than before who were mostly test pilots (know of developmental programs, can deal with high stress emergency situations, cleared for security, used to guvmint bureaucracies). These days much of spaceflight time is transit (constant on orbit and hopefully some time will be long transit time from earth some place in space). There isn't a lot of fast paced dynamic situations i.e. in one week you go from launch to TLI, lunar orbit, land, walk around, take off, lunar orbit, TEI, and high speed re-entry. Of course need to have someone who can stay level-headed in case of serious emergencies in ISS, which are rare (they had a few mishaps on Mir).

    Years ago I read in a article where candidates go through final interviews in front of a panel. Much of discussion on various developmental and research programs they worked on. Then someone in panel asks the $10,000 question, "So, why do you want to be an astronaut?" This question typically floors almost all the candidates. But one answered, "Uh, my dad was an astronaut, my grand-dad was an astronaut, it just runs in the family." He was chosen.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com