Slashdot Mirror
Galaxy S7 vs iPhone 6S: Samsung Has the Upper-Hand, For Now (hothardware.com)
MojoKid writes: To look at Samsung's new Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge smartphones, on the surface, one might mistake them for only a modest uplift of bells and whistles, and perhaps a light rebuffing of the phone's design language. However, one of the primary new features of the US-targeted Samsung Galaxy S7 is its underlying power plant — Qualcomm's Snapdragon 820 system-on-a-chip (SoC). The Snapdragon 820 is based on Qualcomm's new, custom ARM-based core architecture called Kyro. Kyro marks an evolution beyond Qualcomm's venerable Krait core architecture that the company claims offers 2X the performance and power efficiency of their previous-gen Snapdragon 810. In addition, the quad-core Snapdragon 820 has a beefed-up Adreno 530 graphics engine on board as well. In performance testing versus Apple's potent A9 platform in the iPhone 6S Plus, Samsung's Galaxy S7 with the Snapdragon 820 generally outpaces the iPhone in multithreaded performance as well as graphics. The Apple A9 still does a lot of work with just two cores, but overall it looks as though Qualcomm has a highly-competitive SoC and Samsung put it to good use.
What the people really want to know is how FBI Mode performs on new devices. -PCP
Okay, so graphics and Multithreaded are faster. But watching videos and web browsing are for more typical usecases for most people, and the Samsung loses heavily.
Look at the browser benchmarks in the page here:
http://anandtech.com/show/1012...
The iPhone 6s is almost twice as fast as every other phone out there, and it came out nearly 6 months ago. I don't view the S7 as competitive, let alone faster. Other companies need to prioritize single-core performance as much as Apple. Multi-threaded performance isn't that big of a deal. This is a phone, not a server*.
-Android Fanboi and proud owner of a Nexus 6
*Yes, I know some power users out there utilize >2 cores on a regular basis. But most users (including myself) do not.
-=Lothsahn=-
I have an LG G4. Not long after I got it, I was in an automobile accident that damaged the screen. The phone was insured from the carrier, but the carrier insisted for no reason I can think of that it should be an issue for my auto insurance policy.
On the plus side, you got a fairly cheap life lesson: never provide more information than necessary. "The screen on my phone is broken" was sufficient to have the phone insurance take care of the problem. "The screen on my phone got broken in a car accident" made it someone else's problem. Pretty much every insurance policy you'll find in almost any area you can buy insurance says something to the effect of "if you have other insurance that covers this, we won't." Since the property was damaged in the accident, your auto insurance would likely have covered the damage, had you submitted that as part of your claim.
What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
Android makes good use of multiple cores. The OS uses them for tasks like encryption and application optimisation (memory management, async I/O etc.) Many apps use them, like Chrome which does background opening and rendering of tabs, JIT compilation of JavaScript, decoding images etc. The Google keyboard uses threads to handle input, spell checking and prediction. Meanwhile another thread is rendering the UI.
The iPhone looks good in synthetic benchmarks because they are mostly single threaded. For real world use where you are multitasking, opening multiple tabs, typing away, Android with four cores is what you want
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
> I'd be in support of a law in Canada prohibiting the sale of consumer devices with non-replaceable batteries.
Really? You'd disallow others to make the choice to buy one because you, yourself, don't like it? You'd impose your will on the rest of the Canadians and take away their liberty to purchase the product?
I am a Canadian citizen by grace of heritage. I spend quite a bit of time there and I'm normally within about 40 minutes from being on the Canadian side of the border. (My home is in NW, Maine and not far from the border.) Fortunately, I know zero Canadians who think like that.
I'm gonna give you a hand, however... I see you used "unique" in your username so I'm inclined to presume you believe yourself special. Seeing as you're so special, I've decided to help you out.
You can't just unilaterally take away people's liberties. They want the iPhone and that's got a sealed case. No, you have to convince them to change their mind. So, what you do is you point out all the evidence that shows (and this is easy enough to find) that a whole bunch of electronics don't end up being properly recycled, that they use rare Earth minerals in their construction, that they're bad for the environment so should be kept as long as possible, and things like that.
You convince them that they need to put a stop to the vendors who are perpetuating these abuses on Mother Nature.Nominally you've a liberal government right now, unless I missed something. I don't vote in Canadian elections even though I'm eligible to - I don't live there, it's not my call. You get a few pictures of the various disassembly processing plants (buildings in the slums) down in India, you get some stats about the concentrations of lithium, you point out the health-hazards as that can leech into the water supply, and you paint consumerism as bad and destroying the planet and that Canada needs to be first in the world to lead the way towards a cleaner, recycled, and reused future.
Now, normally I'd not help you out with this but my country's being really retarded on the whole liberties front. If you can just go ahead and get moving on that then it might take away some of the attention on my country and maybe we can get things settled down a bit down here. That way you can be the bad guys for once and take the heat off us.
So, there you go cupcake. Knock yourself out and take as many choices away from your fellow citizens as you can. You just gotta to it with a non-geeky way - it's very important to be environmentally aware. You can probably tie it in with GHG and climate change - the mining, shipping, and all that are increasing the levels of CO2. If people have batteries that are easy to replace then they'll be more inclined to keep their phone longer. Hell, for good measure, maybe you should limit them to buying a new phone only once every four years, just for that extra bit of authoritarianism. You'll do your country proud and maybe we can start having serious discussions about liberties down in the US.
"So long and thanks for all the fish."