Slashdot Mirror


Apple Announces 'Let Us Loop You In' Event For March 21st (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The official Apple Events page has been updated in advance of the newly announced media event. Invitations were sent out earlier Thursday inviting members of the press to "let us loop you in." The event will be streamed using Apple's HTTP Live Streaming technology and will require an iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch running iOS 7.0 or later. The company is expected to announce a new, smaller iPhone SE, that will be the same size as the iPhone 5 but with improved specs like a A9 processor and 8-megapixel rear camera. In addition, Apple is expected to announce a new, smaller iPad Pro. It is rumored to feature a 9.7" display and a Smart Connector to support Smart Keyboard -- it may even be compatible with the Apple Pencil. We can expect some kind of update for the Apple Watch, most likely new Apple Watch bands. A black version of the Milanese Loop may be in the works to match the Space Black Apple Watch. Of course, Apple will talk encryption as the event is scheduled one day before the next hearing between Apple and the FBI on March 22. Apple may surprise us with new MacBooks or OS X updates but we will most likely have to wait until Apple's developer conference in June.

66 comments

  1. Apple SE Price: $599 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consumers get to save $50 for a slightly smaller phone. It'll go over as well as the iPhone 5c

  2. Watch Timmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a 48 caliber shell to the head in real time!

    Ha hah

  3. You forgot their new product to stop back dooring. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 0

    Apple Butt Plug.

  4. Hmmmm, new watch bands by chrism238 · · Score: 1

    Be still my beating heart!

  5. Also... by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The event can also be streamed from second-, third- and fourth-generation Apple TV set-top boxes. On a Mac, users must be running Safari 6.0.5 or later on OS X 10.8.5 or later, and PC users must use the Microsoft Edge browser in Windows 10.

    In any case Pen support for the regular iPad would be nice, but unless there's some surprise addition this looks like another boring event. Apple has been busy this past year with the MacBook, Watch, iPad Pro, Apple TV, etc, but right now their entire product lineup is either too old or too new to tempt me.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a lukewarm Palm Pilot?

    2. Re:Also... by RDW · · Score: 1

      Support for HTTP live streaming on all platforms seems to be much more widely available than the list in the article suggests:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  6. We need something new by blogagog · · Score: 1

    When are they going to finally come out with that line of footwear I've been hearing so much about (the iShoe)? I'm starting to think it's just vaporware.

  7. let us loop you in -- Sounds intresting by CouponHaat.India · · Score: 1

    Woww.... Apple you rocked as always. I wanted to be a part of this event.

  8. looking for 1 of 3: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1 midtower

    2 mac pro that isn't a garbage can (and garbage design, frankly)

    3 mac mini with quad core, actually capable of ooomph and a couple drives, the mini old server format.

    What I'm going to get is another shitty iphone.

    sigh

    1. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I have the feeling that most people complaining about the Mac Pro actually don't have a Mac. They are not asking for a better product than they have, they just keep complaining without ever buying.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by jbolden · · Score: 2

      The trashcan issue, yeah those are non customers. The its been 2 years since an update and it is now very overpriced those are real mac people.

    3. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      What I'm going to get is another shitty iphone.

      AND a new iWatch strap, you lucky dog!

      Seriously, I like Apple products, I have an iPhone and I recently picked up a refurbished watch for a "good" (in Apple terms) price; as someone involved in app development I kind of started to need one. But when we start getting excited about a new strap for a bloody watch is when we should stop and think if we're not taking our fanboi-ism a tad too far.
      I'm with you on the Mac Mini; I'd love a more powerful model... at a slightly less ridiculous price.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully i don't have it, but i had to work on one at a friend's place.
      Outdated hardware, overheating, hell to clean from dust, looks like a cheap plastic toy and feels that way too.
      Thankfully it wasn't from the January-February '15 line, else it would also have faulty graphical chipset.
      My friend decided he's building his own computers from now on.

    5. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between a full tower with the ability to use desktop RAID [1] and FPGA boards versus yet another toy that has at most a gob of SSD, limited GPU power, and cannot be upgraded. The tower was a workstation. The trashcan is an overpriced toy.

      The ironic thing: The Mac Pro, pre-cylinder, used to be on par with Dell, HP, and other PC makers, feature by feature, price-wise. Which meant it was actually a bargain to use those machines. Now, the PC makers have leaped a generation or two ahead, and the trashcan Mac is now a workstation from 2012-2013, not a workstation of this year.

      Of course, there are the MBPs, which can't be used for anything serious, as they will thermal shutdown if you run something CPU intensive.

      iMacs? The video is so anemic that it barely drives the pixels, much less the video on a second screen.

      Mac Minis? Apple went from four cores to two cores, and has let the model languish for almost three years.

      No, Macs are not Apple's profit center, but Apple needs to at least update the lines every so often. Three years between a refresh is just plain obscene.

      If Apple doesn't want to keep Macs updated, maybe they should spin that line off into another company, so they can be a toymaker exclusively.

      [1]: Yes, people will say that "real men use a NAS". As of today, Macs can't do iSCSI. Macs can't do 10GigE. Macs can't do FC. The fastest I/O you are going to get is from the Apple-only M.2 wannabee SSD. Even a Thunderbolt drive barely performs better than a USB 3.0 drive.

    6. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Holy Grail of a Mac would be a "Mac Pro Mini", a desktop machine that has a number of PCIe boards, server motherboard with the ability to take eight DIMMS, ability to use multiple GPUs, several drive slots, good cooling (perhaps a closed loop Intel CPU cooler) so fan noise is kept to a minimum, and well documented upgrade/repair paths, just how older Macs used to be.

      Pretty much a computer that raids at least a 7 on iFixit's repairability scale... not a 1.

      However, this will never come to pass. Apple wants to sell something that mostly meets a customer's needs, so the consumer winds up having to buy a new computer in a few years. This works for now, as Apple's marketshare is growing... but this is mainly due to people fleeing Windows and the constant sucking sound of telemetry data. Look at the MacBook as an example of how Apple provides the absolute minimum of CPU, RAM, and storage.

    7. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by nine-times · · Score: 2

      I agree to an extent. Complaining about the design (that it looks like a garbage can) is pretty silly. Even complaining about expandability and upgradeability is a bit off the mark-- Mac Pros have always had limited hardware compatibility, but the new ones can be expanded and upgraded pretty effectively via the Thunderbolt interfaces, assuming an appropriate Thunderbolt hardware exists.

      However, I would agree that Apple has a big gap in their lineup: A non-pro headless Mac with some power. They have iMacs, if you want an all-in-one. Mac Pros are pretty powerful, but are really in the realm of "professional workstation". Mac minis are a bit anemic. I think Apple would be well served by making an even smaller Mac mini (more like an Intel NUC or Gigabyte Brix), a big/powerful/expensive Mac Pro, and in between the two, a product just called "Mac". The Mac could be in the same price range as an iMac, but let's say... two or three times the size of a Mac mini, with a quad-core desktop processor and discrete gaming video card.

      I think that if they were to do something like that, it would be a popular product.

    8. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      But when we start getting excited about a new strap for a bloody watch is when we should stop and think if we're not taking our fanboi-ism a tad too far.

      The Apple Watch is not a technology product. It is a fashion product. You wear it to make a statement about yourself. Apple realized from the beginning that the Watch was not competing with Samsung or LG, but with Rolex and Patek Philippe. From a fashion perspective, a new strap that accentuates the watch is a big deal. There is no point in buying an Apple Watch if nobody is going to notice it.

    9. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 0

      But when we start getting excited about a new strap for a bloody watch is when we should stop and think if we're not taking our fanboi-ism a tad too far.

      The Apple Watch is not a technology product. It is a fashion product. You wear it to make a statement about yourself. Apple realized from the beginning that the Watch was not competing with Samsung or LG, but with Rolex and Patek Philippe.

      So that's why it not only outsells the competition, but also the non-competition. Because Samsung tried to sell their high-tech tool by telling people to make a statement about themselves: that they secretly film girls with their watch and then show it to them in some bar.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    10. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by tw2k · · Score: 2

      You seem to be saying that you think that the people saying that Apple doesn't make computers that meet their needs are the same people that don't actually own Apple computers. Surely that makes perfect sense?

    11. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by jasno · · Score: 1

      I'd buy a super mac-mini in a heartbeat. The wife and I are pretty tired of OSX, but I'd still go for it if it was available. We're looking to upgrade our 2008 24" iMac and at this point we're both(!!! - she's not a nerd) leaning towards Linux or even Windows. I'm just not willing to pay the mac tax for outdated hardware. I could go for an iMac, but then I have the same problem I'm facing now - a nice display that's going to go in the garbage because the associated hardware is outdated.

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    12. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by macs4all · · Score: 1

      [1]: Yes, people will say that "real men use a NAS". As of today, Macs can't do iSCSI. Macs can't do 10GigE. Macs can't do FC. The fastest I/O you are going to get is from the Apple-only M.2 wannabee SSD. Even a Thunderbolt drive barely performs better than a USB 3.0 drive.

      1. GlobalSAN iSCSI Initiator allows iSCSI Targets. Or if you like F/OSS Solutions, iSCSIIntiator does it, too.

      2. Sonnet has a TWIN 10GigE to Thunderbolt adapter. Pricey, yes; but I think that might be the case with 10GigE overall. And you didn't say "cheaply"...

      3. Several companies, including Atto, have both Thunderbolt to FC (as well as TB to 10GigE) adapters. Promise has a TB to TWIN 16 Gig FC adapter, too.

      Sure, some of these interfaces cost as much as a cheap used-car; but OTOH, the people that need this stuff are generally not just surfing the web and posting stuff on Facebook. And again, you stated flatly that it couldn't be done; NOT that it couldn't be done on a "beer" budget.

      So you see, Apple's decision to throw their design-decisions behind Thunderbolt is (finally) beginning to pay-off. They simply don't have to have a pile of dedicated connectors (not to mention the hardware to support them) for them to be able to offer (mostly through 3rd party vendors) these relatively exotic interfaces, for those who need them.

      Did they go too far with the new MacBook's "one connector to rule them all" approach? Hell, yeah! But, all-in-all, Apple has made a very wise decision with ThunderBolt, and the proof is that other computer manufacturers are (finally!) beginning to agree.

    13. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by irrational_design · · Score: 2

      I actually have a mac pro. I had the old tower version and I now have the "garbage can" version. There are two things I don't like about the new version. 1. My old tower mac pro had 4 internal drive bays. Now I have a desk full of external hard drives hooked up to the mac pro. I much prefer the internal drive bays. I wish I could post a picture on slashdot to show you the morass of black cables surrounding the mac pro. 2. I get the spinning beach ball of death much much more frequently than my old mac pro. I don't know why, but that has been my experience.

    14. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Is there a reason why they're all not all together in one enclosure?

      As for the beach balls, I have the feeling from reading here and there that the nMP is a fickle machine. Leo Laporte of Twit.tv actually give his nMP away (or sold it or some such) because of the stability issues. Not at all what one would expect from such a machine.

      I'm still running a MacBook Air from 2013. It's not a pro, but it handles most of what I throw at it and it's been so bizarrely reliable that I have no problem waiting for the Skylake update.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    15. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      You may want to rethink that. The iMac is one of the few pieces in the lineup that's actually been updated with Skylake CPUs.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    16. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      On one hand, it does. On the other hand, you usually don't pick Apple just for the hardware. You pick it for the combination of software and hardware.

      So if you are seriously pining for something particular Apple hardware, I think you must already be using OS X.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    17. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      You seem to be saying that you think that the people saying that Apple doesn't make computers that meet their needs are the same people that don't actually own Apple computers. Surely that makes perfect sense?

      Actually, it seems he's saying that the people complaining that Apple doesn't make computers that meet their needs are also the people who say they would never buy an Apple, not even if they had the perfect computer for them.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    18. Re:looking for 1 of 3: by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > 3 mac mini with quad core, actually capable of ooomph and a couple drives, the mini old server format.
      ^ THIS

      My wish list would add:

      4 MacBook Pro with GTX 980M (for CUDA support)
      5 OpenGL 4.4 support
      6 Official support for eGPU

  9. If they wait even longer... by cerberusss · · Score: 2

    Apple may surprise us with new MacBooks

    That, or they may continue to make good money with 3 year old CPUs.

    Except for the iMac, virtually the entire Mac lineup gets the advice: "don't buy" because they're all based on Intel's previous gen chips (Haswell). Skylake is nowhere in sight currently: http://buyersguide.macrumors.c... Now I have to admit, the MacBook Pro series only uses Intel's high-end integrated GPU, so they've actually been waiting on Intel the whole time. But still.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:If they wait even longer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And 32 GBytes of RAM? I've held-off for three years on an upgrade, because I need more RAM to run vms.

    2. Re:If they wait even longer... by threephaseboy · · Score: 2

      because they're all based on Intel's previous gen chips (Haswell).

      Haswell (4th gen) is actually 2 revs out of date, Broadwell is 5th gen and Skylake is 6th.
      It seems the 13" rMBP has a Broadwell chip, but the top of the line 15" rMBP really isn't that much different, spec wise, than it was in late 2013.

      --
      .
    3. Re:If they wait even longer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple may surprise us with new MacBooks

      That, or they may continue to make good money with 3 year old CPUs.

      Or they could surprise us yet again, by offering an even slower Mac Mini like they did last time when they went from quad core to dual core and soldered RAM! Maybe now it will come with a dual core A9 CPU and even less (soldered) RAM...

      Or a new Mac Pro that does not have space for an internal GPU (you can connect as many as you like via Thunderbolt), but is a really cool looking mobius strip!

      (I won't try the diacritic on mobius, /. is not ready for that I'm sure)

    4. Re:If they wait even longer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even just getting 16 GB on a MacBook Pro required having Apple BTO (built to order) a machine. Sorry, with RAM so cheap, the MBP not being upgradable, Apple should be selling even the Mac Mini with 16 gig minimum, 32 to 64 gigs standard.

      Especially with the fact that Macs are shitty with memory management, so when they start paging, and you get the pinwheel, most likely the machine will be rendered inoperable until you power cycle it.

      Of course, there is disk space. With no iSCSI, FC HBA, 10gigE, or other fast protocol available, the only fast drive on a Mac is the internal SSD, so you have to pay Apple an additional grand just for getting 1TB of basic storage.

    5. Re:If they wait even longer... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1
      Yeah, can't wait for Apple to ship some Skatlake products. Well, maybe they really only freeze Windows and Linux computers, and OS X never had those problems.

      But maybe that's your problem, that you can't blame Apple for that?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  10. Let Us LOCK You In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The actual announcement is: "Let Us Lock You In"
    FTFY

    1. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      That's getting a bit old. If you want to use iCloud and related, sure you're locked in.

      But if you're a techie like most of the people here, you'll switch that off and use apps that are cross-platform. OwnCloud/Dropbox, SimpleNote, WhatsApp, etc. For the regular stuff like email and calendaring, just use anything that works over IMAP and CalDav.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      And don't use iTunes, don't get any proprietary accessories / chargers, don't use AirPlay, don't use iMessage... in the end you might as well not get an iPhone to begin with if you care about vendor lock-in.

    3. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      And don't use iTunes, don't get any proprietary accessories / chargers, don't use AirPlay, don't use iMessage... in the end you might as well not get an iPhone to begin with if you care about vendor lock-in.

      Well, at least you won't be locked into Google then. Or Amazon.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    4. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      When you are "locked" into Google you have choices between dozens of manufacturers. They all use standard chargers. The messaging application (Hangouts) is cross-platform. You don't need any proprietary software to manage your music library (MP3 copy and paste works fine).
      The level of vendor lock-in-ess if much, much lower than with anything Apple makes or even touches.
      You can even choose no to use the Play Store and use Amazon instead. Or you can install your own APK manually and not use any of those if you wish to. The OS is largely open source, and alternatives (cyanogen mod) exist. You can develop your own applications, on a PC made by any vendor, running either Windows, Linux or OSX (not sure about BSD), and you can share them with your friends and even sell them if you want to, all this without being forced to ask Google for the permission.

    5. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by Archvile7 · · Score: 1

      What phone/technology vendor DOESN'T try to lock you into their ecosystem nowadays? Microsoft and Google are just as bad as Apple about that. But I bet you're fine being locked into your Google Play Store.

    6. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Apple is by far the worse.
      http://apple.slashdot.org/comm...

    7. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by Imazalil · · Score: 1

      Between all the different USB specs, I have at least three "standard" chargers. But, hey, at least I can gloat that it's not proprietary right?

    8. Re:Let Us LOCK You In by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      When you are "locked" into Google you have choices between dozens of manufacturers.

      Yeah, people keep switching between Android manufacturers - hoping that this time their phone won't suck. Much better that way.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  11. I tried to read the summary by blackpaw · · Score: 0

    But my Cerebellum committed suicide half way through.

  12. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by rsborg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Consumers get to save $50 for a slightly smaller phone. It'll go over as well as the iPhone 5c

    You do realize that for some folks, even the 4.7" iPhone6 and 6s are too big?
    Not everyone wants a large phone or phablet.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  13. Re:You forgot their new product to stop back doori by rsborg · · Score: 2

    Apple Butt Plug.

    I'll take that over an Android "Share Plan".

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  14. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You do realize that for some folks, even the 4.7" Phone6 and 6s are too big? Not everyone wants a large phone or phablet.

    This. The iPhone 4 (that I had, broken now) is:
    115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 mm
    iPhone 5:
    123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm
    iPhone 6:
    138.1 x 67.0 x 6.9 mm

    Even the Xperia Z5 Compact, pretty much the only other "mini flagship" is up to:
    127 x 65 x 8.9 mm

    It's getting thinner, fine... but it's getting taller and wider because obviously with more space you can put in more CPU, more GPU, more RAM, more cameras, more battery, more misc chips like touch id etc. but I liked how pocket friendly it was. If Apple pulls of a high quality "mini" phone they might at least get one sale and that's me. It's pretty clear the mainstream market is more willing to compromise on size than me though.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  15. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Agree 100%.

    I got a 6S 6 months ago because my battery life on my 4 was getting short enough that it was starting to bug me.

    I hate my 6S. It still feels awkward in my hands and it's tall enough that it's fallen out of my shirt pocket a number of times when I bend over to pick up my pants in the bathroom. (Obviously I'm doing it wrong!)

    Wish I had waited a bit longer to get the smaller one, but the rumor on a smaller iPhone has been floating for more than a year, so I didn't think it likely until recently.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  16. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    People disliked the 5c because of its reduced memory and bargain-basement look & feel, not because of its size; the similarly sized 5 / 5s sold well enough.

    I recently switched from a 5S to a 6S, but I find it a bit too big and too thin for my taste. If Apple bring back a 4" model into their lineup with full specs, fingerprint scanner, the works, having the form factor of the 5s, then that might very well be my next phone.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  17. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by castionsosa · · Score: 1

    Same here. I have had generations of phones. The 6S is the first phone I've had which requires being placed on a shelf, TP dispenser, or otherwise held, otherwise when using a restroom stall, it will just fall out of the trousers. Every generation before that (3, 4, 4S, 5, 5S), not an issue.

    Some people just like large phones or phablets. I prefer a smaller phone, especially when using a more protective case like an Otterbox Defender, because if I'm out camping or doing some maintenance on a vehicle, I don't have to worry about something happening to the phone.

  18. But only if you're already roped in by wjcofkc · · Score: 0

    I try to stay out of Apple bashing, but there is a point where you encounter undeniable truths. I have never met someone willingly move from Android to iOS. The only scenario is as follows: pre-paid customer A breaks Android phone. Their friend, pre-paid customer B is on the same network and has an old iPhone 4 that can be reactivated.

    Granted, I have seem people leave Android for Windows Phone or BlackBerry, but I have never seen anyone leave any of the three platforms for iOS. Okay, so that's an anecdotal observation and certainly not exclusively true, but you have to be walking around with your eyes shut not to see that it is in fact overwhelmingly the case.

    I know I am beating a dead horse by saying it, but Apple needs something new and innovative. Something so compelling that people will switch from other platforms, even the haters. This will not be found in a new product line or refresh. This could be found in a sweeping update to the iOS interface. I recognize why Apple might find that dangerous, but something has got to give.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:But only if you're already roped in by nytes · · Score: 1

      Well, step up and shake my hand.

      After years of being stranded on Gingerbread, with no further updates, my wife and I switched to iPhones at the beginning of this year. I've been very happy with the change. Pleasant little surprises have revealed themselves every other week or so, like when I called my wife's phone for a test, and her iPad rang and she was able to answer from there.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    2. Re:But only if you're already roped in by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      I do in fact know where you are coming from. I did say not exclusively true or something similar. In my case I switched from Android to a Blackberry Classic. In fact, that was last week. I thought I knew perfectly well what I was buying into, but I keep running into these little but totally awesome functions. Your calling me out is fair. There is a difference between playing around with devices, and digging in deep because you actually own one of any given platform for the first time. I didn't really think my way through that part of the post. But I am surprised at being currently down modded. I think there is a lot of truth in that we need detailed comparison reviews of mobile OS platforms. When I say detailed I really mean that, not superficial glances. I've never seen such an article. A friend of mine is still rocking an S4, with a fully up to date OS and it is plenty fast. Operationally you could barely tell the difference between it and the most recent model Nexus I gave up for my BlackBerry Classic, with the exception of 3d Mark, and I only know one or two people who use their phones for intensive 3d. In that area as long as I can play Sonic Dash and Open Arena I'm good.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    3. Re:But only if you're already roped in by nytes · · Score: 1

      About the most complicated thing I think I've run on my iPhone is Hearthstone, although I may have tried Goat Simulator once.

      Most non-technophiles are probably reluctant to move off a platform they are familiar with, especially something that they may need to depend on working, like a phone.

      The techies that write up the reviews seem to use something for just a week or two before writing about the experience, probably due to deadlines set by their editors. Hence the reason that it's hard to find good side-by-side comparisons.

      Even my wife, who has plenty of experience with her iPad, groaned when I first mentioned moving to iPhones. She didn't want to have to learn how to use a new phone. What finally convinced her was discovering that her calendar was no longer synching.

      Now I'm reading about how hard it is to reliably wipe a phone, especially an older Android model. I'm considering feeding our old phones into a wood chipper :)

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    4. Re:But only if you're already roped in by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      As far as your old phone goes, I maintain a collection of old phones including a rather pathetic LG running 2.2.1. The hardware always seemed like too much too waste. Although I never knew what I might use them for. I recently had some, let's just say people trouble. In fact pretty recently. I looked into it and found software for all of them lets me run video surveillance. I have five old phones and they are all running lower power mode video surveillance indoors and outdoors. I was even able to toss my two old Windows Phones into the mix. So it might be worth the trouble of wiping. Even a very old phone is some mighty powerful hardware when put to the right task.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  19. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by PPalmgren · · Score: 2

    Its only pocket friendly because your pockets are too small. I'm not a big fan of the whole skinny jean hip-huggers so tight they cut the circulation off to your balls and raise your voice an octave.

    In all seriousness, I understand how pockets shrink the smaller you are and you can't expect a 110b 5'1'' woman to wear baggy enough clothes to store a phablet in their pocket. However, while phones have gotten bigger, they've also gotten much thinner and many have tapered edges. My 5.7'' screen phone fits fine in my front pocket because of this, while my droid 1 from like 5 years ago was a bulky mess at half the size because of its thickness and sharp edges.

  20. Aren't Intel's older CPUs actually FASTER? by itsme1234 · · Score: 2

    Didn't Intel say they're going for SLOWER CPUs? AFAIK 4790K is the fastest single thread x86 CPU and it is quite a few years old (it is also considerably more expensive now than it was when launched!!!).

    I know, sure it isn't really the same with portables and there are energy efficiency improvements but still the point is that 3 years old CPUs aren't what they used to be so to speak :-)

  21. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    I got a 6S 6 months ago because my battery life on my 4 was getting short enough that it was starting to bug me.

    So you are a victim of Apple's non-replaceable battery scheme?

  22. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Consumers get to save $50 for a slightly smaller phone. It'll go over as well as the iPhone 5c

    You mean the phone that outsold almost every other phone model at the time? Yeah, it's gonna be just as unsuccessful.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  23. IoT will save our souls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by Nadir · · Score: 1

    I have seen very few 5C in the wild. Are you sure ?

    --
    --
    The world is divided in two categories:
    those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
  25. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Its only pocket friendly because your pockets are too small. I'm not a big fan of the whole skinny jean hip-huggers so tight they cut the circulation off to your balls and raise your voice an octave.

    In all seriousness, I understand how pockets shrink the smaller you are and you can't expect a 110b 5'1'' woman to wear baggy enough clothes to store a phablet in their pocket. However, while phones have gotten bigger, they've also gotten much thinner and many have tapered edges. My 5.7'' screen phone fits fine in my front pocket because of this, while my droid 1 from like 5 years ago was a bulky mess at half the size because of its thickness and sharp edges.

    I'm a huge fan of skinny hip-huggers on hot looking gals everywhere, so consequently I'm supporting the appropriate sizing for the new iPhone.
    Women, feel free to put on you hip huggers!

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  26. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    I can attest to this. My boss has complained quite bitterly about the iPhones 5 and 6 being too big. He wishes he could keep using his 4S, although apparently it's too slow and buggy on iOS 9 to be usable anymore.

  27. Re:Apple SE Price: $599 by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1
    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.