Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Hacker GhostShell Doxes Himself So He Could Get a Job In the Industry

Posted by msmash on from the bad-guy-turns-good dept.

An anonymous reader writes: One of the most notorious hackers around has decided to dox himself after getting tired of hacking companies and failing to find a legitimate job in the infosec community. Razvan Eugen Gheorghe, 24, is one of the early LulzSec members and leader of Team GhostShell. He is now hoping to get arrested so that he could negotiate a plea deal and become a white hat hacker with a company or state agency somewhere. For the past 4 years, the hacker was literally 2km away from Romania's crime investigation unit, a 10-minute ride away.

88 comments

  1. Are there no roads in Romania? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> 2km away from Romania's crime investigation unit, a 10-minute ride

    I can run 2km in 10 minutes. Are we talking a rickshaw ride or are there really no roads out there?

    1. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> 2km away from Romania's crime investigation unit, a 10-minute ride

      ...by goat.

    2. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope you can find a tunnel. Romania is a very mountainous country.

    3. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Remember you told me to tell you when you were acting rudely and insensitively? Remember that? You're doing it right now. "

      When people say something takes "10 minutes", they often just use that as a general indicator for a short period of time, rather than literally 600 seconds.

    4. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Informative

      In most big cities it's faster to walk 2km than drive, and Bucharest is particularly bad:

      http://www.romania-insider.com...

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Or maybe its bumper to bumper traffic and he likes sitting in air conditioning. I would be in the car with him.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never been to a city before?

    7. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, you have to walk across the parking lot to the car, use the non-through roads to get to the highway, navigate a mile or two of slow traffic, take the correct exit, and when you're parked, walk across the parking lot to the police station, unless it's drive-in. I'd say 10 minutes is an optimistic estimate. Don't forget that this is an American site: People need an estimate of the time it takes to drive 2km because they measure distances in multiples of body parts, and walking is something that you do to get to/from a car. You just made them wonder if you include changing into running clothes in the ten minutes or not. Running is something that is strictly done to get from point A to point A, which is the place where you park your SUV (the S in SUV stands for sport, so this is an adequate use of a truck).

    8. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Nobody said it was a 2km drive - just that it's 2km away. In addition to the other comments about traffic / traffic control devices.

    9. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by The+Relentless · · Score: 1

      "Mr. Potato Head! Mr. POTATO HEAD!!!"

    10. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Bernie, is that you? That was offensive. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    11. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get to the highway, navigate a mile or two of slow traffic,

      2km is 1.6 miles... you cant do 2 miles in slow traffic...

    12. Re:Are there no roads in Romania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you can't, but one day you'll get your license and then you can too.

  2. I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 2

    I mean, I can understand wanting to come in from the cold and all. But this seems ill thought out, all and all. From what little I know about Romania, it doesn't seem like a good idea to turn yourself over to the authorities with the corruption scandals going on. They would be more likely to give you a harsher sentence to prove that their precinct is "clean". But, like I said, I'm not very well versed in the country or its laws.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean... I'm pretty sure that's how law enforcement works EVERYWHERE. This sounds like a very bad idea, but then again, it does say the guy is only 24.

    2. Re:I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      At least in the US such criminal conduct would automatically exclude you from any work with the law enforcement agencies. Your previous criminal conduct would be an issue in every trial of every investigation you'd worked on. I dare say your very involvement with law enforcement with computer crime convictions would jeopardize any case you touched. Now the spy agencies might be interested but there is no way the law enforcement groups would touch you with a 10 foot pole. And even the spy agencies probably won't be interested if you've got a felony conviction as that would basically bar you from getting security clearance.

      Your only real chance with a computer crime criminal conviction is in the private sector doing white hat hacking. That's where your skills have real monetary value and a criminal conviction though damaging isn't nearly as severe. But even then you will need to be famous to pull a job because the company will have to audit every single thing you do.

    3. Re:I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by Threni · · Score: 1

      > At least in the US such criminal conduct would automatically exclude you from any work with the law
      > enforcement agencies.

      I'm pretty sure some Anonymous members worked with US law enforcement!

      Others, such as Kevin Mitnick, work privately.

      "But even then you will need to be famous to pull a job because the company will have to audit every single thing you do."

      Huh? Pull a job? Which company? You just work for - or start - a company and just get on with it.

    4. Re:I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Oh no, you'll get plenty of work but do not expect to get paid much, working release from extended custodial sentences whilst producing good returns for those with the keys, for the tech slave not so much. Perform stay out of prison on token pay, don't perform back in prison and not just threats but, like right now and convince them over the next few weeks how you can produce results, this whilst back in the cells. Some number of years latter after an extended custodial cadet ship you might get a job where you can be supervised. With a global recruitment base, with proper psychological testing, there a huge numbers of white hat suitable people to train up. Black hats are far more likely to just end up work release slaves for years and years and no job, recidivism will always provide an opportunity to 'er' rehire them (they would not work on prosecutions, just catfish ;D or mind numbing research and reports on completely monitored system, soon as they squeeze what they can out of them back to the cells).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous was formed by the NSA and everybody else is just tagging along. Every once in a while they take somebody down but at the end of the day the core members are NSA.

    6. Re:I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wouldn't. A criminal record never stopped anybody working for LE (half of the police force would be out of work), and convicted cackers becoming well paid security consultants is a standard career progression. If you've got skills that are in demand nobody cares about your record.

    7. Re:I hope they consulted a lawyer first. by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "From what little I know about Romania, it doesn't seem like a good idea to turn yourself over to the authorities with the corruption scandals going on"

      Corrupt countries are more likely to cut a deal.

  3. Neat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So a criminal has decided to get a real job, but he can't because he has committed a bunch of crimes, and employers might not want criminals working for them. Maybe he should have considered not committing crimes in the first place.

    I don't feel much sympathy for him since people like him have caused so many problems for law-abiding citizens all over the world.

    1. Re:Neat... by Falos · · Score: 1

      >he can't because he has committed a bunch of crimes
      He couldn't as John Doe. If a headline screams "no longer incognito" then it follows he previously was.

      But John Doe couldn't claim to be author of sketchier accomplishments, and Razvan decided he needed their double-edged merit.

      I won't claim those were "right" or "wrong", or even opine on the wisdom-or-not of this latest move.

    2. Re:Neat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't unable to get a job due to committing crimes, he was unable to get a job due to having a mostly blank resume.
      Now he's got an impressive resume, and won't be able to get a job due to the crimes.

    3. Re:Neat... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      These days it seems crime no longer pays well enough to stay in business. That's hard time for everyone in IT.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    4. Re:Neat... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      a criminal has decided to get a real job, but he can't because he has committed a bunch of crimes, and employers don't know it's him. They do want criminals working for them.

      Fixed that for you.

    5. Re:Neat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use "crime" like it's a synonym for cold blooded murder... you know that at least 50% of businesses hire someone who has committed a crime.

      Have you ever been caught speeding? CRIMINAL! you should never be hired again... absolutist.

  4. Job in Jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be that people would get jobs from these antics. However, the times have changed. Apart from some very dodgy agencies in less free countries, this will only result in a good mind being wasted in prison for a minimum of 5 years.
    If he would have just worked on vulnerability research, and sold his findings to well-known buyers, he would have a good job somewhere already, and would not have to spend time in jail.
    What a shame.

    1. Re:Job in Jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did that get downvoted? Isn't that what black people believe? By downvoting that post, you are demonstrating cultural insensitivity, and reservations about increasing your diversity levels. Please minimize your racism by upvoting that post about Michael Brown. Your microaggressions are offensive.

    2. Re:Job in Jail by narcc · · Score: 1

      It got down-voted because it was 1) completely offtopic and 2) for the last sentence, which gave away the posts true nature.

      You should be modded down as well, as your post is also an obvious troll.

      --
      Required reading for internet skeptics
    3. Re:Job in Jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I see the 100-meter dash I figure I'm watching a crime in progress: a gun goes bang and a bunch of blacks start running.

    4. Re:Job in Jail by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Yuck. Everything about that is creepy as fuck. Mainly that you're posting it here where it's not at all relevant. Your mind cannot be a fun place.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    5. Re:Job in Jail by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Why did that get downvoted? Isn't that what black people believe?

      I'm white. Do you think I 'believe' the same shit as you? Are you fucking stupid?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    6. Re:Job in Jail by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Every time I see the 100-meter dash I figure I'm watching a crime in progress: a gun goes bang and a bunch of blacks start running.

      Yes, that is indeed what is meant by "a racist joke". Thanks for providing an example for all the people who have never come across one before.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Nope. No way. No chance. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Relevant prior convictions are a surefire way that NOBODY in the industry will touch you with a ten foot pole.

    Maybe, MAYBE someone would if someone is looking so they can demonstrate that they push you away.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Um, you must be joking. Parts of the Infosec industry regularly hires hackers with convictions. It is "street cred" for that industry.

    2. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by jtayon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What scares me is that given it is harder to recruit black hats and they have access to less qualified work force they do a pretty good job at defeating top notch major in CS.

      Our HR recruitment process are clearly recruiting expansive work force, but not a good one.

      I feel more and more uncomfortable with the actual lack of practical knowledge of dev/sysadmins/architects that comes out of schools to directly push stuff in production that are shit.

      25 years I do this job, 25 years I know how to avoid SQL injections, 25 years I get fired for asking we remove these from our code base, as much as obsolete ciphers, shell injection, cookie theft, mechanism that result in amplification of DOS ...

      Well, if computer industry want to lose the trust of their customers by not hiring competent workers, they began by losing mine.

      And I do encourage people actively to back all their valuable they can from internet nowadays. This industry is irresponsible.

    3. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      There is an overabundance of really useless information in a computer science degree. Even much of what is useful isn't all that great for a particular specialty.

    4. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by spacepimp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kevin Mitnick called; he said you are talking out of your ass.

    5. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not for the serious part, i.e. the part that pays well.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      These people could do a good job of securing systems and software, but they are budget-constrained and management-constrained. The hackers have a lot more freedom. Also, the defender is always at a disadvantage. On the other hand, most IT systems never get attacked seriously because nobody tries. The hacker-problem is overblown (due to some obvious political propaganda interests), only those with really bad security get hacked. Yes, that includes quite a few that should know better.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      It depends which part of the industry you're talking about.

      The corporate IT, comparatively white collar world? Yes, convictions are a kiss of death here, and even moreso in the government realm. But in the more wild-west style startup world? Maybe not so much.

      It used to be much easier, especially for the earlier hackers, because they had expertise no one else did. As time goes on, that's less the case, especially for the more risk-averse sorts in the corporate/government spheres.

    8. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even moreso in the government realm

      Officially.

      Don't get me wrong: I think this kid is in for some serious trouble, but if his gamble does pay off, it will probably be with some shady government agency. All of the major governments, especially in that part of the world, are trying to fill ranks right now to prepare for what they see as the new "cyber battleground" that will be a major front in any future war. He'll probably spend some time in prison, but if his record is as impressive as he's making it out to be, then somebody with deep pockets can and likely will simply pay off his sentence... Happens all the time.

    9. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see assets on my network that are still vulnerable to shellshock, because the Indians they've hired out to manage our patch cycles are ridiculously incompetent. I could and should go to these assets right fucking now and patch them, but I can't, because out-of-band patches require RFCs with enormous amounts of paperwork, none of which would get approved because I'm not on the team that manages the fucking patch cycles. All I can do is yell, send emails, fill out forms, make calls, and generally sound like a jerk, all of which gets management angry at me, when they should be asking what the offshore folks are doing with all the money we're throwing at them. But I digress.....

      The long and short of it is that you're right: our hands are tied, while the hackers have free reign. I can't do even the most basic remedial patching when it's staring me in the face, because corporate policy restricts me from doing so, and because of that a hacker -- any hacker -- can just waltz in the back door and do whatever he wants with those systems.

    10. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I do not think his record is any good. LulzSec only ever attacked easy targets. The only difference to the average script-kiddie is the public grandstanding and the publicly celebrated nihilism.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by fredrated · · Score: 1

      Didn't Mitnick get a job in the industry?

    12. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look it's very simple. Just because someone gets a CS degree does NOT mean the have the passion for the job at hand. This often means that people entering the field get a relatively good paying job, doing fairly low-end stuff and end up quite satisfied with where they are, and have no reason to expand their skills further.

      This is exacerbated not only by burnout where people leave the field entirely, but also by the sheer lack of any qualitative measure of productivity or quality.

      How many of us labour under draconian EA's dictating ivory tower standards, but don't even have a DEVOPS role in house, let alone a proper QA department.

      I've personally struggled under many a project manager who believe Agile = micromanagement. I've even seen PM's spend entire days micromanaging employees while sitting at the employee's desk.

      So, is it no surprise that the small minority of us who actually have the passion for the job end up ditching the degree idea, and just teaching ourselves, end up as black hats, and then wonder WHY no one will hire us for a paying gig?

      I think the average black-hatter frankly would likely die from boredom in the average IT job. I'm not sure most companies want someone like that in their IT departments, as they would surely unmask all the idiocy and likely end up leaving from frustration. Given that hiring is easily the most expensive thing to do, IT managers want people that are 'good enough' and will stay. They don't want shining stars illuminating how incompetent they are. They just want sheep who can do the job and are willing to shut up and take orders.

    13. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a place like google or DARPA would never hire a known hacker...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And others have all types of trouble finding employment and or careers...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Mitnick
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dildog
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Wysopal
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Appelbaum
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Bloodaxe_(hacker)
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Dotcom
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Poulsen
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Soghoian
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moxie_Marlinspike
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Headley

      In your defense -- not all of these people were convicted, but enough were -- and most of the others made tools that clearly could have gotten them convicted, or were outright treated as national security suspects.

      "In the industry" means what to you? Full time software development only? It'd be a waste of talent for most of these guys at this point.

    14. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by quantaman · · Score: 1

      What scares me is that given it is harder to recruit black hats and they have access to less qualified work force they do a pretty good job at defeating top notch major in CS.

      Our HR recruitment process are clearly recruiting expansive work force, but not a good one.

      There are a ton of extremely competent and trustworthy devs/sysadmins/architects who have never been blackhats, they just cost a lot of money because everyone wants an extremely competent and trustworthy dev/sysadmin/architect.

      There's a tiny handful of extremely competent and really untrustworthy devs/sysadmins/architects who have been blackhats, they might do good work, but they also might get pissed off and decide your organization needs to be taught a lesson.

      Do you really think Ghostshell will do such fantastic work that it justifies the risk of giving him root access?

      I feel more and more uncomfortable with the actual lack of practical knowledge of dev/sysadmins/architects that comes out of schools to directly push stuff in production that are shit.

      25 years I do this job, 25 years I know how to avoid SQL injections, 25 years I get fired for asking we remove these from our code base, as much as obsolete ciphers, shell injection, cookie theft, mechanism that result in amplification of DOS ...

      If you got fired for trying to fix the code base then there was either other stuff going on or you were really terrible at office politics.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    15. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had me at "Kevin Mitnick called ..."

    16. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such as?

    17. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Everyone but him maybe.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    18. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I think you've been watching too many movies...

    19. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you must be joking. Parts of the Infosec industry regularly hires hackers with convictions. It is "street cred" for that industry.

      I always thought this was something that movies and television made up.

    20. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Nobody manually rotates polygons by doing the matrix math anymore, but you still have to learn it.

      Its generally useless for most IT people to know how to actually count in binary, but they make you learn that too.

    21. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I have to concur with all your points, but I'm afraid that probably the incompetent hiring practices of the industry as a whole today is evidence that they never were counting much on the trust of their customers in the first place, and perhaps never really thought they had it, or cared. (Microsoft's general behavior since the mid-90's being a case in point.)

    22. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nobody programs in ASM anymore, but if you know how, you will never ever fall prey to a buffer overflow, because you KNOW how they work.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There is one single reason we "overblow" it: Because it's very hard to get PHBs to understand that matter at all. They don't understand why a, say, SQL injection in the customer database is a problem. You have to give them a threat scenario they can understand. Sometimes this does seem a bit overdone, but that's not really far from what is actually possible if the risk hits you with its impact.

      It is very hard to "sell" security to PHBs. Security costs money but will never earn any. It protects you against damage, but selling that is like trying to sell someone who never saw a house burn a fire insurance.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Agile = micromanagement? Pffft, harmless. The norm is "agile = chaos, changing at the whim of the PM".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Dude, that was the OLDEST trick in the book. How do you know it was really Mitnick? Dammit, didn't you read his book?

      On a more serious note, Mitnick was long, long before corporations learned (sometimes the hard way) that people who don't like to play by rules don't like to play by their rules either. You can use that at the offensive side, but that's a part that few corporations have (and if, there sure won't be an ad on Craiglist), but you do NOT want such a person protecting your assets.

      And while good security researchers are still in short supply, there are now a few other ways, even for HR, to determine whether someone knows his shit or is selling snakeoil.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:Nope. No way. No chance. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Maybe it depends on what you aim for. Personally, I wouldn't like to know that there is a glass ceiling keeping me from climbing any further because I did something to ensure no corporation trusts me enough, so I have to watch duds and idiots climb past me and create ridiculous rules I have to abide by.

      Yes, the people you list there are all great security researchers. Well, except li'l Kim there. He's more the Kim Yong Un of IT security research, a loudmouth without anything to back it up, and the embarrassing stepchild that gets mentioned time and again when it comes to running names of ITSEC personnel. It's like dogshit under your boots, you just can't get rid of it... anyway.

      Most of them did something commendable in the name of ITSEC. In the end, though, they all either suffer from the glass ceiling or had to jump into the cold water and start their own business to end where they belong.

      And that's a bit steep a price to pay.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Epic by softnewsit · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't be epic if authorities would just ignore him :))))

    --
    Go away!
    1. Re:Epic by iggymanz · · Score: 0

      oh I think he'll get half his wish. he'll get arrested.

      of course, he'll then go to pound-your-ass prison but hey free room, board, and sexual partners. if he smokes he could marry the one with the most cigarettes.

  7. Is it really "doxxing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really doxxing when you reveal your own identity?

    1. Re:Is it really "doxxing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like most popular buzzwords, 'doxxing' has lost it's original meaning, and now fulfils whatever role the person using it wants to. Next week, we'll hear about grandmothers doxxing their gardens (by pouring water on them) to make the flowers grow better.

    2. Re:Is it really "doxxing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he spent two weeks at one of those touchy-feely "find yourself" courses and thought he should capitalize on it.

    3. Re:Is it really "doxxing" by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      he spent two weeks at one of those touchy-feely "find yourself" courses and thought he should capitalize on it.

      Yeah maybe...but I was thinking he finally got a girlfriend.

      Perhaps she goes to church, and she won't live in sin. He can worship at her alter, or take vows there, after he repents

      Why hack for pr0n when you can finally milk a holy cow.

      Young love....

      Moo.

  8. No chance by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Too young, not enough experience, no proven skills (hacking _something_ is easy, as long as it does not have to be a specific target), criminal record.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  9. Not so sure about this ploy .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I mean, if you're a "well known" hacker, people in the industry doing hiring should be aware of you already. Getting arrested doesn't seem like a big benefit to me? (If you were good enough not to get caught, that should say enough about your talent. With the criminal record, you just limited your employment options, even if it enhanced your credibility in a few other, select areas.)

    I can't speak for the situation over in Romania, mind you. But here in the U.S., there's apparently a real problem where law enforcement wants to hire "white hat hackers" but usually finds it can't do so because they don't pass their basic background checks and requirements. (I know one guy who said the FBI really wanted to hire him, simply because he never smoked pot. They said that's the deal-breaker for a whole lot of computer info-sec applicants they get.)

    1. Re:Not so sure about this ploy .... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      well we need to change the pot laws like we did with prohibition. Just think how hard it would of been to find people if just drinking beer got you black listed for life.

    2. Re:Not so sure about this ploy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, they didn't hire because his DIDN'T smoke pot? Wait, what?

      Maybe he should move to the USA and work for an African-American gang. They really like people with criminal backgrounds. Especially if they are "gay for the stay", AKA "on the downlow".

      If that offends you, you are probably a racist and bigot that needs to attend a diversity re-education class. Being African-American, gay, and a convicted criminal is something to be proud of.

    3. Re:Not so sure about this ploy .... by Megol · · Score: 1

      If you are proud of that why not post logged in?

    4. Re:Not so sure about this ploy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you have to be so racist?

    5. Re:Not so sure about this ploy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait... .what? Do people actually answer yes to that shit on the paperwork?

    6. Re:Not so sure about this ploy .... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You think you're making a brilliant point, don't you. ooh, people call people racist, and they're stupid and mean and wrong.

      I don't give a fuck about labelling you racist. All I care about is that you're a petty small minded fuck. Racist tendencies just come along for the ride with that.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  10. It's a bold strategy Cotton... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    I got nothin' else. This just seems to be one of these "insane enough it might work once" moves.

  11. You can't dox yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you don't get a choice over what is released when you are dox'd.

    What he has done is called disclosure, or possibly a confession (with all the legal ramifications of that word)

  12. Easier Job Choice: Cybercrime? by Noble713 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What does it say about the state of the Eastern-European cybercrime industry if a hacker would rather transition to a White Hat instead of "lat moving" into full-on cybercrime? Is it not financially viable, even for a guy with his skill level? Is it too risky due to violence from competitors (cybercrime mafias are still *MAFIAS*)?

    I think the opportunity costs of his options are more interesting than him doxing himself.

    1. Re:Easier Job Choice: Cybercrime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A brilliant economics paper once answered the question "If drug dealing is so lucrative, why do drug dealers live at home?"

      To sum up, the typical drug dealer makes less than minimum wage, but the profits at the upper levels are high enough to present a disproportionate view of how much the average person makes. It is a few kings on top of seas of peasants, with the peasants playing the game in hope of one day becoming a King.

      I imagine it's not very different for the full-on cyber-crime. He probably doesn't join it because it probably doesn't pay enough, and the odds of him becoming "big" are too small compared to the odds of him becoming dead or imprisoned.

    2. Re:Easier Job Choice: Cybercrime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he got a little older and realized that it's a lot more challenging and a lot more lucrative to work on the defensive side, but he had no provable skillz without taking credit for his work. I'd hire him if he could demonstrate what he says he can do.

    3. Re:Easier Job Choice: Cybercrime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that would depend on the quality of the meme.

  13. *turns himself in by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 3, Insightful
    s/doxes/turns himself in.

    Can we please stop using random neologisms-du-jour and get back to real language?

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

    1. Re:*turns himself in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perl is a real language, you insensitive clod!

  14. In the Land of Jambi of Milk and Honey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy/gall should hack the Fed's iPhone 5se "Farook" and pronto.

    Then the Director of the FBI can call Timothy Donald Cook at Apple Inc. to say, "Hi Timothy %^&*( Donald Cook. Ha ha."

    Oh boy That would just FRY Timmy's nuts!

    Ha ha

    [fuck you. I see you. You look like shit. Right.] Question: Where is the Safest Place to Hide from the Police? Answer: Sit on the Steeps of the Police Office! Ha
    Your fucking password system mis-spells fatality as patality you shit heads! You go to school in India?! Ha ha Goat Fuckers.