Slashdot Mirror


Sea Rise Could Force Millions In Florida To Adapt Or Flee (miamiherald.com)

mdsolar writes: For the first time, a team of researchers looked at ongoing population growth in areas where the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has created flood maps that more accurately reflect local conditions. What they found was startling: projections that failed to factor in population growth in dense states like Florida hugely underestimated the number of people at risk and the cost of protecting them. Combined with the findings from a 2015 report, that means Florida can claim two titles: most property at risk, and now, most people.

5 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Let's all start running now! by cjonslashdot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes but at a sea level rise rate of 2-4mm/year, I think that people will have time to adjust!!

    1. Re:Let's all start running now! by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not the gradual rise that's the issue but the increased likelihood of extreme events. Events that might be considered "once in a lifetime" will happen with such frequency that insurers simply won't provide cover. People living in at-risk areas will be wiped out so often that they'll be driven to live somewhere else. It doesn't help that Florida is so flat either since it means storm surges could well travel miles inland and do damage.

    2. Re:Let's all start running now! by ooloorie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Common sense is that you ban new housing, make it attractive to move somewhere higher - won't happen.

      In principle, there is no need to ban such housing, we just need to stop subsidizing it. Right now, it's subsidized both through government-financed flood insurance programs, as well as through the provision emergency services. That encourages people not only to build in risky places, but also to pay for flood-proofing their homes. If people had to pay for the full cost of insurance and emergency services out of their own pockets, many people who currently build in flood zones would consider it too expensive and build somewhere else, and others would flood proof their homes instead of getting a fresh home every few decades courtesy of the tax payer. Attempts to reform the system have been repeatedly undermined. (I think the reform act was probably too heavy handed. A better and simpler choice might be to limit payouts from government subsidized flood insurance to a one time payment, both per site and per property owner.)

    3. Re:Let's all start running now! by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are gone. They're all artificial at this point.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  2. Re:It'll sort itself out. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You had better not let the environmentalist religious wackjobs hear you saying that humans can just adapt. They'll burn you at the stake if you're not running around screaming "THE END IS NIGH!!"

    Who are these people? The environmentalists I know aren't religious, and are more oriented towards mitigating the issue.

    And the religious I know don't believe in global warming, sea level rise, or any of that "liberal claptrap" at all, and are actively seeking the end of the world.

    And as I've had to explain to many people, adapting doesn't men that you and your family change. It means you and your family and 99 percent of everyone dies, and the rest are left to reproduce.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.