Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Employees Launch Matchmaking Startup For Coworkers (geekwire.com)

reifman writes: As posted earlier, Amazon's growth and predominantly male hiring has made dating in Seattle incredibly difficult for everyone. Two Amazon employees, Becca Goldman and Mahvish Gazipura, recently launched DateADev to help coworkers optimize their dating profiles: 'at Amazon [we're] surrounded by software developers and project managers all the time, we just noticed their need. We talk to them all the time about their frustrations with dating.' Goldman's gone on more than 500 dates in the past three years. 'Her experience ... helps her quickly assess an online profile of a potential partner.' Rather than drive its employees into moonlighting, Amazon could just start hiring more women.

34 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. 500 dates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the problem is You ?

    Says the forever Virgin -_-

    1. Re:500 dates? by penguinoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd say she's probably conducting a scientific study on lonely males. 500 data points so far. I admire her dedication. You go, girl.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re: 500 dates? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure a date doesn't mean sex which means someone is a troll.

    3. Re: 500 dates? by sparkeyjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Either that or she's looking for free food.

    4. Re: 500 dates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      500 dates in three years? This is why Seattle is ideal for Amazon's growth and why they don't hire more women. If they spend so much time dating and distracting their colleagues , how much time can they be spending on coding?

      Get back to work sweetheart!

      PS, from a current suffering Seattleite, 500 dates in 3 years is probably par for the course for woman of middling quality. Punished by choice the darlings. Perhaps we men of Seattle are socially inept, but from my experience I encounter single women way too seldom ever to develop any skill or finess at the game.

      For the past three years I've tried everything, get-togethers, singles mixers, salsa dancing, or clubs and lessons for outdoor adventures like kayaking, sailing, hiking, skiing, etc. etc. Either zero single women attend these kind of things, or if they do their swarmed with thirsty interested suitors 8 to 12 deep.

      I give up now. Resignation.

      Seattle is a crummy overpriced and overrated city but in a very a lovely setting. As a single man you better not mind enjoying it alone though.

    5. Re: 500 dates? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      You say that like it's was bad thing. Why?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  2. ... Amazon could just start hiring more women. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..... or allow its employees to have lives outside of the company. Either/or.

    1. Re:... Amazon could just start hiring more women. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      This assertion that corporations should allow their employees to have lives outside of their companies is completely antithetical to American values and should be banned as hate speech. I hope you get locked up and waterboarded in Guantanamo for saying such a thing. Absolutely disgusting.

  3. Re:500 dates!!? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Funny

    Personally, I stick to the under $10s rule for the first date...

    I'll bet you don't have too many "second" dates...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  4. Women don't like dating engineers, in America. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If women *did* like dating engineers (in America), this problem would resolve itself.

    Of course, there are reasons why women don't like dating engineers:

    1) Social myths and stigmas about engineers.
    2) The realities behind the social myths and stigmas about engineers.
    3) Engineers tend to be introverts and beta-males, and as such they don't exude the sense of power that makes men attractive to women (despite their wealth).

    These are social problems. They need to be fixed by social means. Another online dating service won't accomplish that.

    1. Re:Women don't like dating engineers, in America. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not all Amazonians are engineers.

      Engineers tend to be introverts and beta-males, and as such they don't exude the sense of power that makes men attractive to women (despite their wealth).

      I keep hearing this. It's an anecdote that doesn't hold true in my circles.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re: Women don't like dating engineers, in America. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      You do know that telling people about this place is going to drive more traffic to it. It's one of the few places anywhere where men don't get shamed for wanting to have sex.

    3. Re: Women don't like dating engineers, in America. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      You do know that telling people about this place is going to drive more traffic to it.

      At this point the signals completely lost in the noise anyway.

      It's one of the few places anywhere where men don't get shamed for wanting to have sex.

      Odd. I've never had that problem. Nor any of the other problems that TRPers whine about. Then again I don't act like women are vending machines dispensing sex after enough nice guy tokens are entered or any of the other random problems they have. Hell my female friends never shamed me for wanting sex. (But That means I also had female friends, a concept beyond most TRPers).

    4. Re: Women don't like dating engineers, in America. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      don't have a problem that a whole lot of other people complain about, obviously the problem simply doesn't exist.

      Having spent more than enough time playing anthropologist on TRP and other similar sites and pages it boils down to "a whole lot of other people" are massive assholes.

      ...one loaded with blind assumptions (more like accusations) about the people who do have this problem.

      When you read half of the stuff that comes out of their mouth it's not very blind.

      If the girl has great tits and ass, I can't be friends with her.Simple as that

      Who cares about a woman's personality if she's not hot enough to make my dick get hard?

      A sad bunch of man children that toss about words like "alpha" and "beta males" while whining they can't get laid. All while talking down to women, treating them like the 'smartest teenagers in the room'. It doesn't take a lot of time reading what they post to see where the problems are.

    5. Re: Women don't like dating engineers, in America. by ayesnymous · · Score: 2
      | I don't act like women are vending machines dispensing sex after enough nice guy tokens are entered

      Only beta males act like that.

    6. Re:Women don't like dating engineers, in America. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      These are all correct, and this is why engineers should look for women from Asia to date, rather than dating American-born (and especially Caucasian) women. Women from Asia have a totally different outlook on engineers, and see them as good, stable partners with very good income potential. Asian women also tend not to care too much about "alpha males" or men who try to emulate Hollywood stereotypes and want men who are loyal and good providers for their families.

      So the answer is simple: Amazon should just import a whole bunch of women from southeast Asia to provide a large dating pool for their male employees.

  5. Bad Idea by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're hiring women solely so that the male workers have someone to date, it's just asking for trouble. Anyone who's ever seen a workplace relationship turn bad knows what I'm talking about. Also, from what I've heard about Amazon, it's not the best place to work in terms of work-life balance. I don't think Amazon is actively avoiding women so much as the only people stupid enough to sign up for something like that are young 20-something men who don't have a family yet or the experience to realize what they're signing up for.

  6. If there's no one to match against... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    it simply won't work. I've lived in Seattle for eleven years, and I've only met one single female that's within -10 and +5 years of my own age. In the current company I work for, there's about 320 men and 80 women, and no unmarried women. I don't know where they're hiding.

    1. Re:If there's no one to match against... by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but a lot of those women you met are single. They just told you otherwise.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re: If there's no one to match against... by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you think Seattle is bad, you should try Bellevue.

      Went to a club there last Saturday, and there were literally no women other than the waitresses. I've lived here for twenty-two years, and not a one of my male friends has had a girlfriend, much less married. I love the job options here, and I'm saving enough to retire when I'm fifty, but it sucks being alone with zero chance of finding someone. I've tried Plenty of Fish and match.com. After sending hundreds of messages, I've never even gotten a date. I've got a flashy car (Ferrari 360, older but still nice) and a 22-story condo overlooking Lake Washington and downtown Seattle, but I haven't even met a girl to even try to impress.

      Perhaps you're looking for the wrong type of girl - not all girls are going to be impressed by your Ferarri, plus I imagine that unless a girl is particularly athletic, she's not going to want to climb 22 flights of stairs from your livingroom to the bedroom.

  7. "Could Just" - treating women as commodities by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Amazon "Could Just" hire more women.

    Ok, from where?

    The bad thing about hiring quotas by any determinate like race or gender or any pool with a smaller population, is that ALLOF THE COMPANIES are trying to generally do the same thing.

    So lets say Amazon does succeed in doubling the hiring rate of women - doesn't that mean there are a LOT of companies now short their "share" of women? In fact is it any wonder that small companies are so devoid of women when so many large companies are trying so desperately to hire women? Centralizing technical women in a small number of companies in fact seems like a terribly bad idea to me and is probably exacerbating all of the technical culture issues people have noticed (which must be said are rooted in Silicon Valley and not nearly so bad outside that echo chamber).

    The whole thing makes me sick honestly, and to me seems to objectify women vastly more than, say, porn...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Just data mine the book purchases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If a woman buys a book on IoT or Spark, and she's young (based on her music purchases) and has weight proportional to height (based on clothing buys), you've got her email address, so send her a nice followup note.

  9. Amazon, home of the brogrammer! by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a male dev who has interviewed and knows people at Amazon, the problem isn't lack of an app. After I went out to talk with them for a day, I came away with the impression that there are a large number of really arrogant and pushy people working there. Undoubtedly, my personal experience isn't statistical representation of the whole company, but I wasn't very impressed with them as people. They seemed stressed, hurried, egotistical, and self-centered. I didn't want to work there for money, so I could imagine that few women would want to date people like that for free.

    Anecdote: If you go on a date and the date goes poorly, the person may have been a jerk. If you go on 10 dates and they all go poorly, chances are you are actually the jerk. If nobody at Amazon can land a date, what does that tell you? A lack of girls in Seattle? For being so smart, you seem pretty slow...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  10. The trifecta by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An article about more women in Tech, Amazon, and Dating geeks.

    The clickbait is strong with this one ;)

    That being said, two questions jump to mind. One, I heard that Amazon employees sign contracts that every idea they might have, even if unrelated to their primary job, is the property of Amazon (it is Seattle, so I think the contract is enforceable). Does that hold true here? And secondly, just hire more women?? I never heard of Jeff Reifman, but he sounds like a class act, NOT. His chief tip? "Offer larger signing bonuses for women". Is that even legal?

    I have Karma to burn, so I'll ask a question that has been on my mind for a while - is gender balance (in any industry) a goal? Or is it a means to a goal. I often hear "We need more women in Tech", but I don't understand why that is a goal by itself. It might be more clear to say "we need smart people in Tech, and smart women are turned away from STEM, so we need to fix this". Because there might be other ways of achieving the second goal (irrespective of gender), while the only way to achieve the first is to make the hire ratio even.

    1. Re:The trifecta by tomhath · · Score: 2

      I have Karma to burn, so I'll ask a question that has been on my mind for a while - is gender balance (in any industry) a goal? Or is it a means to a goal.

      That's a very reasonable question, but the answer is "neither". The goal is equal opportunity; quotas don't solve that problem. A doctor would point out that they are treating one symptom while the patient is dying of the disease.

  11. She's doing it wrong by marcle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    500 dates in 3 years is about 3-4 dates a week. Are each of them with different guys? Sounds exhausting.

  12. Let's do the math by PuddleBoy · · Score: 2

    Let's see; 500 dates in, say, 1200 days comes out to another date every 2.4 days.
    Assuming that a date often consists of dinner and maybe a movie, we'll say it occupies about 4 hours per date.
    If the average person sleeps 7 hours per day, during those 1200 days, she was awake 20,400 hours.
    Of those waking hours, we'll estimate that she worked approx 8500 hours, leaving 11,900 hours for everything not sleep or work related.
    Take away at least 2 hours per day for various daily, unavoidable activities like showers, breakfast, dressing, cleaning... So that's another 2400 hours.
    That makes 9500 hours that might fit into the category of discretionary time.
    The dates occupied 2000 hours, or roughly 21% of all her discretionary time.
    I'd call that throwing yourself into your work...

  13. of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amazon could just start hiring more women.

    Sure, hire more women to make the male devs happy! In fact, to make them really happy, why not hire women as cocktail waitresses, masseuses, and exotic dancers, right?

    The sexism of social justice warriors really knows no bounds.

  14. Re:Are you a moron? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    One of the absolute worst ideas is having a relationship with someone you work with.

    ^^^THIS, times a million trillion kabillion. Never date at work, NEVER EVER. It never ends well, and I've seen it more times than I can count.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  15. Re:LOL, WHAT?? by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to her own comments in the (comments section of the) article, the dates were not serious and were deliberate research for this start-up. So rather than simply sucking at dating she merely sucks at not using people. Not entirely sure if that's better or worse?

  16. Based on ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... their results for "Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought", I'm wouldn't place too much faith in their selections. Unless it has a good return policy.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  17. Begs the question by Solandri · · Score: 2
    Is she rejecting all the guys asking her out on second dates? Or are guys not asking her out on second dates?

    'Her experience ... helps her quickly assess an online profile of a potential partner.'

    I dunno. Do you really want to trust the judgment of someone who hasn't yet found a partner after 500 dates?

  18. And I mostly disagree by BlueCoder · · Score: 2

    As far as doing work which is engineering... you need the socially awkward culture. And like it or not for the most part that isn't women. That's a different kind of intelligence. Being polite and politically correct is not what you need in engineering. You need straightforwardness. You need to be sure of what you say and not be afraid to say it. You can't be afraid to be wrong.

    What could be possible is social, speaking and communications training. And while the men would also benefit from social training I think women women would benefit more by adapting to and understanding the social conventions of men. Learn to be politically incorrect. Love ideas and what you do; not people. Be problem focused. Male nerds don't necessarily like each other; it's more we only tolerate each other. We are rude to each other and we are all headstrong.

    1. Re:And I mostly disagree by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I very strongly disagree with you. It's perfectly possible to be firm, honest and technically strong without resorting to rudeness, "political incorrect" stuff or hiding rudeness being the pretense of politeness. Compare for example:

      "Why the Fuck did you make that design? Are you a Fucking retarded fag? "

      Versus:

      "Your design is unworkable because self sealing stem bolts won't hold up under those conditions."

      The second one is not rude, not politically incorrect and more useful than the first. Rudeness is often confused with honesty because both involve saying things that someone won't want to hear. They are not the same however. I'd contend that being rude and including politically incorrect slurs actually is less effective than otherwise since your target is more likely to fixate on the insults than the technical content of what you're saying .

      Please also refrain from tarring all make nerds with the same brush. One can be a dyed in the wool nerd without being a jerk.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.