Slashdot Mirror


Apple Unveils Smaller iPhone SE, Starting At $399 (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Apple has officially unveiled a smaller, cheaper iPhone designed to make a splash in the budget-friendly smartphone market. The new device, called the iPhone SE, looks nearly identical to the iPhone 5S but with a new rose gold color configuration. It's the internal specifications that differ significantly. The new iPhone SE will feature a NFC chip for Apple Pay, A9 processor and M9 motion co-processor, 12-megapixel camera sensor with the ability to capture 4K video, and a Touch ID fingerprint sensor. Unfortunately, it does not feature Apple's new 3D touch functionality. The iPhone SE will come in two models, 16GB and 64GB, priced at $399 and $499 respectively. You can buy the new iPhone starting March 31, and it will make its way to 100 countries by May.

158 comments

  1. ARE YOU IMPRESSED? by war4peace · · Score: 0

    Replace "Are you sure?" with "Are you impressed?" in this video:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    The answer stays: NO.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re: ARE YOU IMPRESSED? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Damn straight; I can't wait to load CyanogenMod on this badboy.

    2. Re:ARE YOU IMPRESSED? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

      No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:ARE YOU IMPRESSED? by avandesande · · Score: 0

      Frankly I can't wait to get in line to pay 400$ for what should be a 150$ phone.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    4. Re:ARE YOU IMPRESSED? by orledrat · · Score: 1
  2. 16GB storage by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    32GB is the sweet spot for phones right now, and because they can, Apple refuses to produce a 32GB model to force you to pay an extra $100 to get a reasonable amount of internal storage. $499 for the 64GB model is certainly cheaper than the current top-of-the-line iPhones, but a cheap Android with 32GB of storage can be had for well under $399 for truly budget-conscious buyers. If you're locked into Apple's ecosystem and are truly budget-conscious...well, tough luck.

    1. Re:16GB storage by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know, right? It's not like Apple is using flash storage ICs made from special magical dust or anything.

      In fact, their options should be 64GB, 128GB and 256GB. We're in 2016 after all.

    2. Re:16GB storage by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Also, Apple tends to view their hardware as superior so with 64GB on their low-end devices, that would make another selling point against low-end Android devices. Price differences aside, of course...

    3. Re:16GB storage by evilRhino · · Score: 1

      I don't get what you're trying to argue here. Apple has always been targeting the premium market with their devices. If someone is budget minded and still wanted an Apple product, they go for a previous generation or second-hand device.

    4. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apple makes 2/3 of their revenue from the iPhone. It's priced SO properly that they are the biggest company on earth. And have a quarter of a trillion dollars in short term funds. While growing/expanding and paying out 2% dividends.

      Their pricing works very well for them. From a financial point of view, they are the envy of every company on earth, and many governments.

      They're not going to listen to a bunch of cheap bastards whine about don't charge us so much. Go buy your cheap piece of shit phone if you don't want to pay for an iPhone. Just shut the fuck up.

    5. Re:16GB storage by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Micro SD cards are back for the Galaxy S7, so you can put as much storage in there as you like. 64 GB for $20 and 128 GB for $40.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    6. Re:16GB storage by mattventura · · Score: 1

      16GB is the 1366x768 of the phone world. I have 16GB...on my ancient iPhone 4s.

    7. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Blu Life One X is only $150 and the Blu Pure XL is only $350 on Amazon now. I think I'd rather get one of those.

    8. Re:16GB storage by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      From what I read elsewhere and a friend who works at a Sprint, 16GB is the common configuration for a majority of Apple users. I got a 16GB iPhone 6s and use only half that amount for the few apps that I use.

    9. Re:16GB storage by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but maybe they're working their way through a monster order of 16 GB flash chips that they placed years ago. Apple may have over-estimated back in 2013 or so how many iPhones and iPads they would sell.

    10. Re:16GB storage by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I have a BLU Studio Engery 2, I LOVE it.

      $160 including the SIM adapter and 64GB SD card.

      It really lasts all day, and is smaller than almost every Android device with acceptable speed and display.

      It lacks things my previous phone had (now broken motox 2014), but over-all I'm happier with it, getting an honest 20 hours of heavy use.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were locked into Apple's ecosystem and are truly budget-conscious...well, you would buy a second hand phone. With 64GB of storage.

    12. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      64GB has been the sweet spot for at least a year, year and a half. I think they need to dump 16, but no need for 32.

    13. Re:16GB storage by torkus · · Score: 1

      I can see a 32GB option as realistic. Memory does start adding cost, though not nearly as much as the markup.

      16GB though...fills up ridiculously fast if you take more than a very few pictures. Even keeping SMS/iMessage/whatsapp/kik/etc. conversations turns multi-GB very quickly. 16GB iphone = ~10Gb available storage = warning messages before you know it

      $100 for 48GB of memory is ridiculous though.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    14. Re:16GB storage by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...If you're locked into Apple's ecosystem and are truly budget-conscious...well, tough luck.

      Anyone attempting to claim they're on a budget while locking themselves into the Apple "ecosystem" is going to be in for a shock when people physically cannot restrain themselves from yelling BULLSHIT! at the top of their lungs repeatedly.

    15. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, maybe... because putting two of those chips inside those suckers is completely unrealistic from an engineering point of view.

      No, sorry. The explanation is that Apple is being Apple. Greedy mofos as always.

    16. Re:16GB storage by GuB-42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that's exactly why they don't do a 32GB iPhone. They want to sell the $499 model.
      The 16GB model is a low anchor, that's a basic marketing technique.

      And comparing an iPhone with an Android phone on specs is pointless. We all know that you can get more for cheaper with Android, but you won't get an iPhone.

    17. Re:16GB storage by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I wonder if Apple has even done any research on how much space their users' devices have free.

    18. Re:16GB storage by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      32GB is the sweet spot for phones right now, and because they can, Apple refuses to produce a 32GB model to force you to pay an extra $100 to get a reasonable amount of internal storage.

      Let me translate that for you:

      "iPhone isn't like Android. Wah! Wah! Wah!"

    19. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but at $500, show me a more functional phone?

      Seriously? Why are you blathering that 32 is optimal? FOR WHOM?

      Jeezus. If they only released ONE $500 phone with 32 GB of storage, what then?

      Apple can't do anything right, per slashdot. WTF?

    20. Re:16GB storage by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      The reason the 16GB configuration is so popular is because there's a lot of people who feel they have to have the iPhone even if they can't really afford the model they want. Paying the extra $100 for the next level up is simply too much for their budget.

      It's not the apps that generally take up a lot of space, but rather things like pictures, videos, music, and other content. According to this page, the iPhone only has 11.8 GB free out of the box. By the time you subtract the space that the OS takes up, you really aren't left with much room for the rest of your stuff. My current phone only has 8 GB on board, with 4.8 Free. However, this is no problem because I can easily put in an SD card where I can install apps, as well as have it store all my pictures, music, and videos there. If iPhone just let people put an SD card in, then the 16GB configuration wouldn't be so bad.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    21. Re:16GB storage by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Really?

      I don't have an iPhone, but I made sure to get 64Gb when I last purchased.

      I don't like clearing photos off my phone, and I like to download a lot of podcasts and pre-download some music.

      32 sort of works, but it starts to run out after a year or so, 64 gets me two years or so.

      My 16GB only has 5 free, but I don't think I'll need to put much more on it, but I would much have prefered to pay $100 more fo 64GB and give up the SD card (making the phone $250).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    22. Re:16GB storage by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      If you're asking "Why does Apple still sell a 16GB device?", the answer is simple: they charge a monthly fee for iCloud storage, so anybody too cheap to pay the extra $100 for memory pays through the nose in monthly fees instead. My daughter can fill up her 16GB iPhone with video and pictures in about a week, but then she's a member of "generation selfie".

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    23. Re:16GB storage by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      From a financial point of view

      How about from a user/consumer point of view?

    24. Re:16GB storage by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they started out at 64 GB then they wouldn't get as many people to pay the $100 upgrade for the next tier. That's how Apple makes their money. Make the base model just unappealing enough that people want to spend the extra $100.

      At the volumes they do, we're probably talking about at least a $2 billion yearly revenue loss for them if they made the base model more appealing and fewer people upgrade to the next tier.

      They know exactly what they're doing.

    25. Re:16GB storage by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Please tell me where I can get a _reliable_ Micro SD for $40. Trust me, I've had Micro SD cards fail, although usually reformatting them fixes it.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    26. Re:16GB storage by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      You obviously don't take 100 selfies every day, like the majority of iPhone owners do! (Especially the female ones, like my daughter.)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    27. Re:16GB storage by sootman · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I love iPhones, but... fuck. Flatline for 6 years and counting.

      http://pixelcity.com/index.php...

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    28. Re:16GB storage by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know about this card, but their smaller capacity ones have worked well for me (largest one I have currently is 64GB) and at $33 for a 128 GB card it would be worth a try.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    29. Re: 16GB storage by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And therein lies the goddamn problem.

    30. Re:16GB storage by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Yes, they've always targeted the premium market ... and that's why they're starting to lose. The pricing they have was only reasonable when they were the only worthwhile smartphone on the market. This is no longer the case. They wouldn't be releasing a cheaper iphone if they weren't trying to tap the budget market, but it's far too late for that now.

      Apple's consumer rape is not sustainable. Even they've finally figured that out.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    31. Re: 16GB storage by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Subscribe to newegg's e-flyer and you won't have any trouble finding some top-quality 128MB MicroSD modules (i only use samsung) for under forty bucks, though you might have to wait a week or two.

    32. Re:16GB storage by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      You can pick up a modern iPhone for under £20 per month in the UK. That's the price of two packets of cigarettes, or a meal for two at one of these burger restaurants that are all the rage at the moment.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    33. Re:16GB storage by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The reason the 16GB configuration is so popular is because there's a lot of people who feel they have to have the iPhone even if they can't really afford the model they want.

      Or maybe they want an iPhone but don't care about the tech specs?

    34. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You guys crack me up. If you think you're the average user, you're hilariously mistaken on storage. I maintain the iPhones for my entire company and of 81 users that insisted on 32GB, only 20, yes 20 of them have their storage even half full. This is for an IT company and a wide range of employees, but only the tech folks requested larger phones.

      It just isn't needed by the masses ( yet) so why should apple waste the space and make you pay more?

    35. Re:16GB storage by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't take 100 selfies every day, like the majority of iPhone owners do!

      Uh, no. The only time I get a selfie on the Internet is when the Google Map Car drives by the bus stop (see pic link below).

      https://twitter.com/cdreimer/status/705604128198635520/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    36. Re: 16GB storage by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      128MB? Wow, you could almost fit two whole albums on there!

      --
      .
    37. Re:16GB storage by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, they've always targeted the premium market ... and that's why they're starting to lose.

      Mostly because they dominate the hell out of the premium market - probably to the point of saturation. If you've saturated the high end with your product, and want to see more growth, guess where you gotta go?

      The pricing they have was only reasonable when they were the only worthwhile smartphone on the market. This is no longer the case.

      Depends. I have and use an unlocked LG phone that I bought last year... now the thing is starting to bork-up on the home key, and screen misalignment is starting to become an issue. Sure, I got the $200 I spent back out of it, but meanwhile my wife's ancient iPhone 4 is *still* chugging along just fine, years after it first showed up. My next phone? *shrug* Not sure yet, but damn I'm leaning towards something that would hold up better over time...

      Therein lies the whole reason why most folks buy Apple stuff in the first place: It costs more up-front, but you make up the savings over time.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    38. Re: 16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My iphone 5c was subsidized by a 2 year service contract and only cost me $100. Yes I could have picked a feature phone for free, but $100 for a much more useful device seems like a no-brainer to me.

    39. Re: 16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand what a "selfie" is

    40. Re: 16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People just like to attack the most popular choice. In an alternate universe when Linux is the dominant desktop OS, there's a /. full of people bashing it and touting The Year of Windows as finally coming

    41. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They keep buying them.. sooooo? What the fuck is wrong with the retards on this site?

    42. Re: 16GB storage by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand what a "selfie" is

      Another AC without a sense of humor. I miss the trolls and goatse of yesteryear.

    43. Re: 16GB storage by WizMorgan · · Score: 1

      Total Cost of Ownership. It's why I use Apple gear. Your mileage may vary, but mine does not.

    44. Re: 16GB storage by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Here y'go, big boy ;)

      http://goatse.cx/

    45. Re: 16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We understand. You enjoy being raped over and over. The rest of us have a problem with it.

    46. Re:16GB storage by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt that. I bet not many people go for the upgrade- just some kind of 'halo' marketing gimmick.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    47. Re:16GB storage by youngone · · Score: 1
      I've got one of these in my Samsung Galaxy S4, and I've had it for about 2.5 years.

      Bear in mind, that $17.25 is in New Zealand dollars, so about $11.68 in your fancy US Dollars. It's always just worked, I'd call that pretty reliable.

    48. Re:16GB storage by Kjella · · Score: 1

      And comparing an iPhone with an Android phone on specs is pointless. We all know that you can get more for cheaper with Android, but you won't get an iPhone.

      Well I'd say Apple gave itself a pretty damn huge bump here. It's hard to find benchmarks with the 5s, 6s and Sony Xperia Z5 compact (the only other mini-flagship, really) on one page but here and here and here combined gives some:

      Basemark OS II:
      iPhone 5s: 1180
      Z5 compact: 1350
      iPhone 6s: 2619

      T-rex HD (offscreen):
      iPhone 5s: 28.7
      Z5 compact: ~55 (approximated from graph)
      iPhone 6s: 80.3

      Manhattan (offscreen):
      iPhone 5s: 13.1
      Z5 compact: ~25 (approximated from graph)
      iPhone 6s: 40.1

      Considering the 5se will have the same CPU, same GPU and hopefully same RAM as the 6s the 5se should be pretty close and that seems like an awful lot of power in a really small phone. Maybe even overkill to drive a 1136x640 display, but it should give applications a lot of leg room to work with and hopefully keep it performing well even on iOS 10-11-12 and unlike my low-end Android phone it'll actually get updates. Now there's rumors of a Samsung Galaxy S7 mini, but right now I'd say the iPhone 5SE looks to become the undisputed champion - if only in a particular niche. And for giving up the screen real estate a 5se is $150 cheaper than a 6s for the same storage, it's not cheap but it fits the lineup. Pretty sure this is my next phone...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    49. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone with an apple iDistraction uses iCloud for pictures. A dollar a month buys you an absurd amount of storage, enough to hold all your pictures.

    50. Re:16GB storage by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      From a financial point of view

      How about from a user/consumer point of view?

      This is /., where the 1% view the 99% as the great unwashed who are too stupid to really understand how the world really works.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    51. Re: 16GB storage by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I like the ASCII goatse better. :P

    52. Re:16GB storage by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      GODDAMNIT why couldn't they just use 1360 or 1368?

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    53. Re:16GB storage by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      This is why my MP3 player has a 128GB micro SD in it. I hate having to shuffle music around and I like being able to listen to anything I happen to think of at the spur of the moment.

    54. Re: 16GB storage by wertigon · · Score: 1

      Your TCO will probably skyrocket once you find out you need to do something Apple in their infinite wisdom protect you from doing. :)

      That's what happened to most Apple loyalists I know of, anyhow.

      --
      systemd is not an init system. It's a GNU replacement.
    55. Re:16GB storage by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      The Z5 compact is waterproof, has a better camera (more pixels, a way faster focus at 0.03s and a dedicated button to take the pictures), has a higher resolution display (full 720p), oh and 32GB of storage with the option of a microSD up to 200GB.

    56. Re:16GB storage by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Storage space is hardly a technical spec at this point. It's not like more RAM or a faster CPU or GPU where having less just means the phone is less snappy but you can still do pretty much everything you want. Lack of storage can really limit what kind of things you can do with the device. Most games or apps will run on some pretty simple phones. You don't need a lot of horsepower to run most of the stuff being released. But having such a small amount of storage means you can't do simple things like keep a bunch of photos and music on your phone.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    57. Re:16GB storage by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Why all this craze about storage/price, I bought a Moto G2 for my daughter, it has 8GB internal storage, I added a 32GB UHS1 SD card and formatted it as internal storage, ZOOM! she now has 40GB storage for music, pictures, application, etc. without paying a huge premium.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    58. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps many people use only use the web browser.
      e.g. some people will launch the browser on their phone, go to youtube and play music from that. No internet? Then no music.

      11GB? That's large storage for pictures.

    59. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and unlike my low-end Android phone it'll actually get updates.

      And unlike your low-end Android, it costs 2 to 3 times as much. So you can actually buy a new phone when a new Android is out...

    60. Re: 16GB storage by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Interesting claim. What have your Apple loyalists not been able to do? I haven't found a serious problem yet, and neither have my friends.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    61. Re:16GB storage by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The additional storage is what iCloud is for, and in most cases that works just fine for most people's purposes. It also provides backup.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    62. Re:16GB storage by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I keep all of mine in the cloud, but have a fairly large playlist downloaded at all times I can just shuffle.

      I have unlimited data, so usually I create "radio" stations, but like to have access to something without reception.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    63. Re: 16GB storage by wertigon · · Score: 1

      Well...

      Install a webbrowser that actually supports modern webapp technologies for instance? That got one friend to finally abandon iOS.

      http://nolanlawson.com/2015/06...

      And that's just one example of many:

      http://www.greenbot.com/articl...

      iOS is great as long as you stay within what Apple anticipated you wanted it for. However, if you need to go outside the boundaries of Apple, then you are shit out of luck. Then your options are: stay in the fence, or switch to the slightly more open Android.

      This lockdown will only serve to harm Apple long-term. But whatever. :)

      --
      systemd is not an init system. It's a GNU replacement.
    64. Re:16GB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winner of the most stupid post for the week. Well done Basil!

  3. Redefining budget friendly. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My real 'budget friendly' smartphone was $40 out the door, and that was replacing a 5 year old $30 flip phone I really hated to part with. Since it is used only for making phone calls, I guess I'm a member of the populace that just doesn't get it.

    1. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat for the most part. I have a smartphone, but 90% is for calls or the rare text message. It's nice to have the smart features in the rare event you need them (traveling and need directions, etc.) and it's worth it in that case, but otherwise I don't really care much about the apps and other features.

      I don't think you get it just fine, but like me you really just don't care. It's the same thing with social networks. I understand why people like them, but personally I'd rather sit down and have a beer with someone than read their wall posts or whatever it's called these days.

    2. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. My "new" phones are someone old phones, or the cheap refirb models from straight talk. I'm not part of the 1% in this country that just just throw down $400 for a new phone, that's 1/3 my monthly pay!

    3. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the people modding you down. You're right. $400 isn't budget friendly, certainly not for a phone.

    4. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      $40 out the door sounds like you had a subsidized phone - this $399 price is the unsubsidized price.

      That said, "budget friendly" is a Moto G, $179 for 8GB or $219 for 16GB but with the ability to stick in a 32GB MicroSD for $20 more. Those are the unsubsidized prices.

      oh wait... only $11 more now - http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    5. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      At this point $400 isn't even budget-friendly for a 3D printer.

    6. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There actually are $40 unsubsidized Android Phones. Any grocery store or 7-11 has them. They pretty much suck but are usable. I imagine if I was an impoverished Indian wage slave I would be really happy with one.

    7. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      $40 out the door sounds like you had a subsidized phone - this $399 price is the unsubsidized price.

      My mom picked up a TracPhone Android smartphone on sale at our local grocery store for $10. That wasn't a super-special sale price, either. It's still on sale at that price months later. It's an LG with only a 3.5" screen. But it's running Android 4.4 and didn't seem really slouchy on UI reaction time. Plus it's a model that gives you 3x bonus on minutes purchased (when running on a new-customer activation).

    8. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You're obviously not the target market. Apparently the new status symbol is to have the LARGEST phone possible, hence the "phablet" craze. Funny, ten years ago it was fashionable to have the SMALLEST phone possible. Go figure!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    9. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean.

      I bought a Windows Phone a few years ago for $40 brand new on Amazon and put it on an AT&T pre-paid plan. It continues to work like a champ.

      I can think of about a million things that I would rather spend money on than a phone.

      Of course, you and I are not Apple's target market.

      The funny thing is, I don't really know who Apple is targeting with this... perhaps the kids of current customers?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    10. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by kuzb · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with how you use a phone, but there are advantages to considering alternatives.

      Many of us now perform the majority of our communication through text or email. It's convenient, non-intrusive, and good for situations where immediate situational knowledge is not required. A smartphone is well suited to this, a flip phone makes even basic messaging a chore unless it has a keyboard. Unlike a phone call, I don't worry if I'm disturbing someone by messaging them at strange hours or if they're in a situation where they can't respond, because a text can just be ignored until it's convenient for the other party to deal with it.

      Essentially, phone calls are for time sensitive and/or urgent communications. Texts are for everything else.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    11. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I got a nokia 635 for 45$ new off amazon- does everything I need and built like a brick

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    12. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone cost $30 about 2 years ago. It runs Gingerbread, so it still uses USB mass storage instead of that unusable MTP, and apps can still write to the SD card. Plus it has a hardware keyboard. I'm very very happy with it, I just don't know what I'll do when it dies.

    13. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I barely use the smart functions of a phone. The best part of smartphones is the swipe to text feature that simplifies text entry.

      The handiest part of an iPhone I used was that I could scan in a text by taking a picture of it.

    14. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      It was not subsidized. It's a prepaid from T-Mobile.

      The model is a (microsoft) nokia 435, it's a a windows phone but since I only really use it for phone calls it works perfectly for that. I do however miss my previous phone's 17 day battery life on one charge.

    15. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's starting to swing around. I'm betting that 3.5-4.0" devices will be all the rage, as people learn that bigger comes with costs and downsides and just overall clunkiness. I was not at all surprised to see them announce an improved 4" device.

      I love my HTC One (m8) which is a 5" display. I'd love it more if it was a 4.5" display.

    16. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's great that your needs are met cheaply, but that doesn't make you morally superior, or qualify you to comment on what other people want and need.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    17. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      They're targeting me, for example. I want an iPhone that fits into my shirt pockets. I'm not in the market yet, but at some point this 5S is going to get old.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    18. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The (unsubsidized) Android phone I bought recently cost $30, albeit it usually retails for $50. Funny thing is the spec isn't much different from the Galaxy Nexus I bought four years ago (worse screen, no HDMI or NFC, but, with $10 microSD card added, more memory, better battery life, and it seems to be faster too.)

      I know you wouldn't be seen dead there (yeah, right), but visit Walmart's prepaid section. The T-Mobile and AT&T phones can be used as-is with existing contracts for the respective carrier, just slot in the SIM card and you're done. Most devices in that section are well under $100.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    19. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      My phone was $40, unlocked and unsubsidized.

    20. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Tracfone's devices ARE subsidized. Tracfone are stupid and rely on technological measures (bootloader/SIM-locking) to enforce their subsidies instead of legal measures. This gives the illusion of their phones being unsubsidized to the end customer even though they are, but also creates a significant market for bootloader/SIM-unlock exploits - A friend of mine makes QUITE a bit of money finding exploits in Tracfone's bootloaders and selling those exploits to Asian carriers, who buy the phone, unlock it, and resell it at a significantly increased price (but significantly LESS than what the same manufacturer charges for the carrier to buy it unlocked from the OEM.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  4. Oh, oh. by OpenSourced · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple, one free word of advice, worth exactly the cost. The bottom half of the market you don't want to have. When the rabble, the unwashed peasants, starts flaunting the bitten apple logo everywhere, the beautiful people will flee to other phones with a clearer status seal. And then, the all encompassing middle unbrained layer will lose the daze caused by all that glitter, and start comparing phones like they do cars. Then some day you will announce the iPhone 15, and nobody will come to the party, because you know... is "Apple".

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:Oh, oh. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Mass-market phones that have sold into the tens of millions are not 'status symbols'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Oh, oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The top half of the wealthy folks in India are their target. Not the cheapo folks who complain about the price of everything.

    3. Re: Oh, oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you personally use one?

    4. Re:Oh, oh. by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      They kind of are. A statement that "I'm not a lobotomized fuckhead that doesn't have 24/7 access to google" Technically even a crap-ass android passes for this, but Apple has that clean shiny feel.

    5. Re:Oh, oh. by chispito · · Score: 1

      Nothing keeps you poor like living beyond your means. There are plenty of poor people with iPhones.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    6. Re: Oh, oh. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Oh, oh. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      A status symbol is about causing envy, hard to do when you acquire what everyone else already has. Getting the popular product, however, means you're getting the support of that product. For example, if you're purchasing a game console, you want the popular one so that you have the best selection of games. A purchase of a PS4 right now would hardly be the move of an elitist.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Oh, oh. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      iPhones haven't been status symbols in a long time, and they still seem to sell in large numbers. It's not what Apple trades in. An iPhone is an excellent piece of equipment that works smoothly and is backed by superb customer support and an infrastructure, and that's what Apple trades in. If you don't find that attractive, fine, but if you don't see how other people might find that attractive, you're not going to understand and are likely to make up bad reasons and make inaccurate predictions from them.

      People are going to compare phones as if they're cars. Ever ridden in a really high-quality car? It's a nicer experience, and many people are willing to pay for that. The problem is that a Mercedes is going to cost at least $30K more than what I'd normally buy, which is a significant sum of money. If I want a nicer experience with a smartphone I constantly use, it'll cost me a few hundred dollars, which, amortized over the years I'll probably keep it is less than a dollar a day. Going for the best in smartphones is not all that expensive, compared to cars, clothing, sports equipment, and other things.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Re: Small = 4" Screen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You do realize that when people see you they think: guy with a flip phone = loser, right?

  6. Re:In other news by BeauHD · · Score: 1

    But can I buy it in rose gold?

  7. Re:Sucker's Edition by cruff · · Score: 4, Informative

    iPhone Sucker's Edition: why get a 5S when you can get the same for twice the price?

    Because it will do additional things the 5S won't, like WiFi calling and ApplePay.

  8. Re: Small = 4" Screen?! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You do realize that when people see you they think: guy with a flip phone = loser, right?

    To paraphrase Obi Kenobi: "Who's the more loserish... the loser or the loser who judges him?"

  9. Not a status symbol by sjbe · · Score: 0, Troll

    When you sell tens of millions of something it cannot be a status symbol, or if it is it is a very poor one. Nobody gives a shit if you have an iPhone or thinks you are special for it. Nobody I've ever met has bought one with the expectation of gaining meaningful social status. It's just not that special. I have people working for me that make barely over minimum wage who have iPhones and they don't regard it as a status symbol. The meme that Apple users are self absorbed social climbers out of proportion to the general population is ridiculous nonsense.

    1. Re:Not a status symbol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you listen to the way they described their products?
      "revolutionary device"

    2. Re:Not a status symbol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of 7 billion, 70 million having something is a show of status. I really don't care to check whether your "tens of millions" assertion is in iPhones purchased since the original model or just one current generation, and it makes little difference. Something that less than one in one hundred people have is a symbol of status.
      You may not consider it an impressive symbol of status to have access to cheeseburgers whenever you want, but it shows that you are in a higher status than the people who have no choice but to subsist on rice with vegetables and maybe some slow-roast goat once or twice a year.

    3. Re:Not a status symbol by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      They should sell well in revolutionary countries, right?

    4. Re:Not a status symbol by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The Phablets are status symbols, i.e. 6Plus. iPhone in general is sold on the principle of "I have to have FaceTime to chat with all my friends that have FaceTime!" Seriously, it's the apps that sell Apple hardware.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:Not a status symbol by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Look, I haven't been hanging around in India or Namibia recently, so I don't care what looks like a status symbol there. If I were to care about status symbols, it would be about something that looks exclusive in the US, and the iPhone doesn't qualify.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  10. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest submitting a story about it.

  11. Re: Small = 4" Screen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this is the key of the wrong why of thinking! Who cares what they think about that, do not care what others think about you, they not inside of you!

  12. Re:In other news by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 0

    No but there's "carbon-fiber" and gold plating options if you have more money than sense.

    None of that fake, cheap, low-end "not real gold" from Apple. ;-)

  13. Re:In other news by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    Sorry I was thinking about the iPhone only. The Apple watch does come in gold too.

  14. Apple chasing the Nexus 5x? by kurt555gs · · Score: 0

    How the post Jobs world has changed with Apple chasing Google in the phone market.

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:Apple chasing the Nexus 5x? by green1 · · Score: 1

      That's nothing new, Apple has always been behind Android, maybe the difference is they now see a need to do something about it? (not that I'm seeing any evidence of them trying to actually catch up)

  15. Re:Sucker's Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought SE stood for Scottish Edition, since it's for the cheap bastards. Disclaimer, I am of Scottish descent.

  16. Re: Sucker's Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better specs. Ive been holding onto my 5s for years, despite wanting to upgrade at various points. I just dont care for the massive phablet form factor thats so popular, so seeing apple release this is really awesome.

  17. Correction by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    "You do realize that when people see you they think: guy with a flip phone" = Drug Dealer/Pimp

    Fixed it for you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re:Small = 4" Screen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good for you, do I sense a tone of superiority in your statement?

    I require a smartphone for monitoring software that notifies me on my phone when a server goes offline. This saves me SMS charges. Email is also a big advantage when I'm out of the office. I also have the sound turned off on my desktop most of the time, so when I'm away from my desk, it's handy to know when I have email.
    In a pinch it's also useful for troubleshooting issues when I have no internet access where I'm at (and couldn't be bothered to carry my laptop).

    No, I don't use it for Facebook, Instagram, Skype, Snapchat, Twitter, Whatsapp, Candy Crush or any other social media/game. It's extremely useful to me for productivity.

    Lastly I do use it as a phone, which it works extremely well at too! It's like the Swiss army knife of personal devices.

  19. That phrase doesn't mean... by SeaFox · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Apple has officially unveiled a smaller, cheaper iPhone designed to make a splash in the budget-friendly smartphone market.

    I keep seeing this. The iPhone SE being referred to as a "budget market" device. It's not budget-market at all, in price or features.
    Besides the lack of Touch 3D support, it is pretty much the same as the current get "premium market" 6S.

    Have people really been deluded by marketers to the point they measure the value of a device simply based on screen size?

  20. Indication smartphones are under pricing pressure by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $399 for a current-spec iPhone (without subsidy) is a very aggressive price point. Looks like the low-priced second and third tier Android phones are having an impact on Apple's unit sales.

  21. Re: And nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pass-e-accent-aigu" for the Unicode depraved.

  22. Re:Sucker's Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it's not the same phone. That's like saying my PC at home is the same because it has the same case, despite a new CPU, new SSD, new graphics and more RAM.

  23. Re:In other news by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

    "rose gold" because Tim Cook is embarrassed to call it what it really is: frickin' PINK!!!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  24. Extra Extra! by Misagon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Apple releases an iPhone-sized iPhone ... and that is considered news?

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  25. Re:Sucker's Edition by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Still no wireless charging support, and still not waterproof? WTF, Apple?!?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  26. Re: Small = 4" Screen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They guy who quotes Obi-wan Kenobi.

  27. Re: Small = 4" Screen?! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    I find your lack of faith disturbing.

  28. Re:In other news by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    I did, but everybody seems to prefer talking about slightly updated iToys instead.

  29. Flamebait/Overrated is not a disagree mod by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1

    How is this flamebait?

    1. Re:Flamebait/Overrated is not a disagree mod by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      How is this flamebait?

      This is /. Where a reasonable discussion is easily avoided by a simple flame bait moderation. Why introduce facts when you can simply dismiss another's POV?

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  30. Re:Indication smartphones are under pricing pressu by legojenn · · Score: 1

    I have owned an iPhone 5 for three years. I love it as much as one can love an electronic device. It replaced a 3Gs. The 5 does all I want it to do and I am in no hurry to replace it. Until apps won't update or run at level that I am happy with. I was willing to not buy an iPhone next time because I don't want a big phone or pay $1000 for a phone. This might make me consider an iPhone in a year or two when this one has reached end of useful life.

    --
    I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  31. Re:Sucker's Edition by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

    Wireless charging is pointless

    Waterproof would be cool.

  32. Thanks Apple by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Just saved me some money. I said I wasn't going to buy the new phone to replace the 5s if it didn't have all of the features of the 6s. They didn't need to leave out the 3D touch to differentiate it from the 6s models. The screen size was the differentiating feature. I don't want the larger phones because I can't easily work them one-handed but I'm not going to buy a smaller phone that's deliberately lacking in features.

    When Apple brings out a proper 4" phone again then I'll buy it.

    1. Re:Thanks Apple by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Just saved me some money. I said I wasn't going to buy the new phone to replace the 5s if it didn't have all of the features of the 6s. They didn't need to leave out the 3D touch to differentiate it from the 6s models. The screen size was the differentiating feature. I don't want the larger phones because I can't easily work them one-handed but I'm not going to buy a smaller phone that's deliberately lacking in features.

      Or maybe it wasn't possible? Force Touch works because it measures the capacitance between the LCD and the glass. Given the iPhone SE reuses iPhone 5s parts (the case and display), I wouldn't be completely surprised if those parts lacked the necessary metal coatings to do the measurement. And given the cost, I'm guessing Apple would rather continue to use iPhone 5 parts across the iPhone 5 (warranty), iPhone 5s (warranty/refurbs) and iPhone SE line rather than have a special SKU just for the SE.

      Then again, it could also be that because of the smaller screen, force touch either doesn't work well (too hard to push at the corners, or too soft), or because of the glass geometry, results in cracking of the screen.

      (Yes, I thought Force Touch used some special sensing array for pressure, but it turns out it's just measuring glass displacement).

  33. Priced below $600. Amazing for Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're still pulling the 16GB minimum shit, but at least they made an effort to bring down the price this time around.

  34. I know, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a powerful moment of deja vu I just had... as if I was asked at a story posted at 8:44 this morning if I were excited that the iPhone SE were coming out, or something.....

  35. Re:Indication smartphones are under pricing pressu by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    You can have a top tier Android phone for much less than that if you aren't snobbish about Chinese manufacturers.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  36. Re:Sucker's Edition by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Terrible article. Completely misunderstands what wireless charging is about.

    Good chargers self align. No need to muck about with cables, being careful not to damage your shiny. Waterproofing is easier too because the port can be plugged up.

    Slow charging is good too. Fast charging wears the battery out faster. I keep a 500mA charger around for overnight charging when time isn't an issue.

    IKEA started building wireless chargers into furniture. Chargers everywhere. No worries about having the right connector. Public charging without the mandatory USB condom.

    The article you linked compares it to WiFi. That's how ridiculous it is.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  37. Re:Indication smartphones are under pricing pressu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're on a CDMA carrier, the only top tier options are the size of the moon though.

  38. Re:Sucker's Edition by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    Networking was wired. Wires are annoying. Now you can get networking to work really well without using wires.

    Charging is wired. Wires are annoying. It's exactly the same thing. That networking is data and charging is power is irrelevant from the point of view of someone who wants to get rid of wires.

    Which is everyone. No-one wants wires. My desk is covered with them. I can't stand the damn things. But at this point wireless charging isn't good enough for someone like Apple to burden their products with. They've done their research, and it's not ready yet.

    What is wireless charging about, if in your opinion the article misses the point?

  39. Re:Indication smartphones are under pricing pressu by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    CDMA and still resisting the metric system? What a strange country y'all live in. :)

  40. Re:Sucker's Edition by Locando · · Score: 1

    Wi-Fi calling works on the iPhone 5s. So an upgrade just for Apple Pay?

  41. Yet Another Australia Tax Rip Off by marka63 · · Score: 1

    The 16GB model cost AUD 679 (incl GST) which give a pre-tax price of USD 468 at today's exchange rate. That's a 17% markup because we are in Australia.

  42. To all of you bitching about the price: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let's please stop pretending that the cost should be limited to the cost of the parts, as if Apple should be obliged to sell it at wholesale, you spoiled little brats! While excessive profiteering and price-gouging is an evil, there is nothing wrong with allowing them to make SOME money.

    Also, let's not forget that the hardware pays for the software development, which maybe you think should be free; that's fine, that's what that shitty, pain in the ass Android "operating" system is for. Cheapskates and commies who don't mind using volunteer-created software for a mission-critical application like a communication device, for which they really need their fucking heads examined.

    If you don't think a cellphone is mission critical, wait until the first time you have to dial 911 and there's no landline handy.

    The last Android piece of shit I owned before giving up, and giving in, and paying extra to buy an iPhone, was an HTC EVO, and it periodically would become unresponsive, especially while ringing in, and I couldn't answer it no matter how hard I swiped, it just displayed the screen where I could swipe to answer, but would not let me swipe. And no, it was not jail broken, or flashed or modded in any way, shape or form. It was just too busy being a piece of shit.

    After missing about three calls from people I needed to hear from (from the US Federal Government) because of this goddamned piece of pain in the ass Android shit, I decided to shell out extra to buy a REAL goddamned smartphone.

    I regretted in this only two things. One, that I had not done it earlier, and two, that I didn't shell out extra for more memory on that first phone, which would have largely helped me resist the temptation to buy my next one.

    If you're too poor to pay for a good smartphone, and are buying Android junk instead, I feel sorry for you. You can sneer at me as I buy an iPhone SE, and I'll sneak at you for having to use a cobbled-together, piece of glitchy, kludge shit Android phone. And after all the sneering is done, I'll have an iPhone and you'll have a piece of dogshit Android phone, that is cheaper in part because they didn't have to pay for a lot of software development that's being done for them for FREE. By Linus Torvalds and his friends.

    You maybe forget that under all that crappy, glitchy Android annoyance, there's a Linux Kernel that you haven't paid for, and neither did the phone's manufacturer.

    Also, what is the return policy on your Android phone? Where do you go if you need support? Your neighbor's kid? Enjoy your Android shit. I have no great love of Apple as a corporation and their business practices do sometimes piss me off, and I'd leave, it's true, if not for the fact that at the end of the day, they simply make a better product.

    I've tried Android, repeatedly between about 2 and 4, so I know what the fuck I'm talking about. With iOS, I don't have to keep wasting my time relearning how to use the goddamned thing. Anyway, I'm just typing this while I wait for iOS 9.3 to download.

    Bitch all you like, I'm buying an iPhone.

  43. Re:Sucker's Edition by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

    Still no wireless charging support, and still not waterproof? WTF, Apple?!?

    Less space than a nomad, too. Lame.

  44. Missed it by that much by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    Why does small have to be budget? if only it had 3D touch - it'd be a modern phone - just smaller.

    Maybe I need to spend more money on my clothes - do more expensive clothes come with bigger pockets?

    I want it all. But as others are saying - our old iPhone5's are just fine. I'd like to upgrade just because the phone is getting slower and hangs more often.

    For now the SE isn't compelling enough to upgrade. If I was looking for a new phone I'd consider it. I'll wait until October to see what the brand new phone is - I've heard rumor of water resistance. And that is a feature I really do want. If put into the "SE" size it would be a done deal (with 64GB+ of storage because --- I have music). [although I should do the math on Music match to see if more storage is cheaper than swapping on the fly]

  45. Re:Sucker's Edition by cruff · · Score: 1

    Wi-Fi calling works on the iPhone 5s.

    Not according to AT&T.

  46. I've waited long for a small screen phone by kvishalk9097 · · Score: 1

    I am almost always infront of the computer, and after having iphone 3g, 3gs, 4, 5, am now having a lumia 730, which at 4.7" is big for me, and I find a bigger screen inconvenient than the amount of time I use the phone. There is a big market out there for people who purchased a phone with larger screen, and want to go back. There just aren't enough models available that are attractive. Plus people want newer models, not older crap. I'm not an apple fan due to its high price (I consider it immoral to sell at this price) and very high repair costs if done officially in India, but for a 4" screen, no good alternatives really.