Slashdot Mirror


Apple Unveils Smaller iPhone SE, Starting At $399 (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Apple has officially unveiled a smaller, cheaper iPhone designed to make a splash in the budget-friendly smartphone market. The new device, called the iPhone SE, looks nearly identical to the iPhone 5S but with a new rose gold color configuration. It's the internal specifications that differ significantly. The new iPhone SE will feature a NFC chip for Apple Pay, A9 processor and M9 motion co-processor, 12-megapixel camera sensor with the ability to capture 4K video, and a Touch ID fingerprint sensor. Unfortunately, it does not feature Apple's new 3D touch functionality. The iPhone SE will come in two models, 16GB and 64GB, priced at $399 and $499 respectively. You can buy the new iPhone starting March 31, and it will make its way to 100 countries by May.

7 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. Re:16GB storage by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know, right? It's not like Apple is using flash storage ICs made from special magical dust or anything.

    In fact, their options should be 64GB, 128GB and 256GB. We're in 2016 after all.

  2. Oh, oh. by OpenSourced · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple, one free word of advice, worth exactly the cost. The bottom half of the market you don't want to have. When the rabble, the unwashed peasants, starts flaunting the bitten apple logo everywhere, the beautiful people will flee to other phones with a clearer status seal. And then, the all encompassing middle unbrained layer will lose the daze caused by all that glitter, and start comparing phones like they do cars. Then some day you will announce the iPhone 15, and nobody will come to the party, because you know... is "Apple".

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  3. Re:Redefining budget friendly. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $40 out the door sounds like you had a subsidized phone - this $399 price is the unsubsidized price.

    That said, "budget friendly" is a Moto G, $179 for 8GB or $219 for 16GB but with the ability to stick in a 32GB MicroSD for $20 more. Those are the unsubsidized prices.

    oh wait... only $11 more now - http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  4. Re:16GB storage by GuB-42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And that's exactly why they don't do a 32GB iPhone. They want to sell the $499 model.
    The 16GB model is a low anchor, that's a basic marketing technique.

    And comparing an iPhone with an Android phone on specs is pointless. We all know that you can get more for cheaper with Android, but you won't get an iPhone.

  5. Indication smartphones are under pricing pressure by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $399 for a current-spec iPhone (without subsidy) is a very aggressive price point. Looks like the low-priced second and third tier Android phones are having an impact on Apple's unit sales.

  6. Re:16GB storage by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they started out at 64 GB then they wouldn't get as many people to pay the $100 upgrade for the next tier. That's how Apple makes their money. Make the base model just unappealing enough that people want to spend the extra $100.

    At the volumes they do, we're probably talking about at least a $2 billion yearly revenue loss for them if they made the base model more appealing and fewer people upgrade to the next tier.

    They know exactly what they're doing.

  7. Re:16GB storage by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, they've always targeted the premium market ... and that's why they're starting to lose.

    Mostly because they dominate the hell out of the premium market - probably to the point of saturation. If you've saturated the high end with your product, and want to see more growth, guess where you gotta go?

    The pricing they have was only reasonable when they were the only worthwhile smartphone on the market. This is no longer the case.

    Depends. I have and use an unlocked LG phone that I bought last year... now the thing is starting to bork-up on the home key, and screen misalignment is starting to become an issue. Sure, I got the $200 I spent back out of it, but meanwhile my wife's ancient iPhone 4 is *still* chugging along just fine, years after it first showed up. My next phone? *shrug* Not sure yet, but damn I'm leaning towards something that would hold up better over time...

    Therein lies the whole reason why most folks buy Apple stuff in the first place: It costs more up-front, but you make up the savings over time.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?