Slashdot Mirror
Obama Lands In Cuba As First US President To Visit In Nearly A Century (theguardian.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Barack Obama descended on Cuba with a pomp unmatched by the Pope on Sunday, becoming the first American president to visit Cuba in nearly a century, and the first since a revolution led by Fidel Castro toppled a U.S.-backed strongman in 1959. As he arrived, Obama used a Cuban phrase meaning "what's up?" when he tweeted: "Que bola Cuba? Just touched down here, looking forward to meeting and hearing directly from the Cuban people." "This is a historic visit," Obama said as he greeted U.S. Embassy staff and their families at a Havana hotel. "It's an historic opportunity to engage with the Cuban people."
One of the many results of the new diplomatic relations between the two countries is the ability for Cuban residents to become more connected to the internet. Reuters is reporting that Alphabet Inc's Google is poised to expand internet access in Cuba. "One of the things that we'll be announcing here is that Google has a deal to start setting up more Wi-Fi and broadband access on the island," Obama said in an ABC News interview that aired on Monday. The U.S. Treasury Department has even authorized San Francisco's Airbnb service to expand its home rental listings in Cuba to non-U.S. travelers.
Or a strong contender, at the very least.
Because when you need basic things like food and shelter, nothing satisfies like wifi.
Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
Here is what Senator Ted Cruz wrote about this:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/obama-cuba-visit-ted-cruz-213749
If you are a fan of President Obama, could you please explain to me why you think Senator Cruz is wrong about this? Because at the moment I agree with Senator Cruz. President Obama's administration has dropped the embargo and helped out the government of Cuba, and I'm not aware of a single demand that Cuba has granted in return. Set free political prisoners? Allow Amnesty International to visit the prisons? Maybe beat the political prisoners a little bit less? No, no, and no.
Not only did President Obama not make any demands of Cuba, but now Cuba is making demands of President Obama. Pay reparations, return Guantanamo Bay.
I do hope that President Obama will at least use his "bully pulpit" to say something about human rights in Cuba. Words are what he is best at. I would have preferred a binding agreement, but he already didn't do that.
lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
Because even if he's breaking laws, that's not treason...
Treason has a rather specific definition, and not merely "I don't like that guy..."
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
As opposed to say what Saudis do, or the Chinese? I don't understand why people get fixated on the problems with Cuba when other nations that do far, far worse are our best pals and we do billions of dollars of business with those dirtbags.
That I'm guessing that he didn't re-open relations with Cuba because it was the right thing to do and he actually did it as a favor to Google for lending him all the people that ran the IT portion of his campaign. (Since they apparently want to expand their business into Cuba.)
Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
The mark of a true leftist, is that they always view themselves as the political center. There's always room to move farther left, and every who disagrees is to the right.
Because Cuba is 60 miles from the United States.
The mark of a true leftist, is that they always view themselves as the political center.
Does the expression "Fair and Balanced" strike a familiar note?
It took way too long for this to happen. Back when we gave China MFN status, what, early 90s? I was already complaining about the hypocrisy. The rationale was that by engaging with China we would eventually transfer our ideas as well as our goods. The theory behind this was called "Constructive Engagement".
But if CE was really the proper way to deal with these regimes, what about Cuba? It never really worked anyway. CE was just justification--it was all about the money, and earlier it was about playing China against the USSR. It was hypocritical on its face, right from the start.
I've literally been complaining about this since before some of you were born. Sheesh! Look, I get it. Castro stole your stuff, and you're mad; but most of the people who directly lost are dead. Aside from that, conquest happens. It's how America was built. At some point you have to write that off.
Don't get me wrong. Communism sucks. It's an evil little anachronism that exists down there; but our way of dealing with it didn't work. Time to try something different... finally!
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
Politics has more than one defining axis. The left/right dichotomy is very much a false one.
Obama is quite far "left" on some social issues (i.e., homosexuality and abortion). But, I wouldn't classify him as left or right on some other important issues, such as:
- State Surveillance - the Nazis are often held up as an example of an out-of-control "right", while Stalin's Communists are an example of an out-of-control "left". And yet, neither of them had surveillance systems as extensive as that established by Bush ("right"), Obama ("left"), and their recent predecessors.
- The role of Wall Street in the American economy today is not consistent with either Capitalism or Communism - more like Corruption... (Again, this didn't change much under Obama versus Bush.)
- Militarism - The drive to conquer (or merely destroy, as with Iraq, Libya, and Syria) other nations is not exclusive to either the right or the left. The way that Hitler and Stalin at first agreed to divide the conquest of Eastern Europe between the two of them at the opening of World War II is a fine example of this.
- Religious Freedom - This has been both suppressed and supported by both the "left" and the "right" at various times and places in history.
The whole "left versus right" thing should be ditched in favour of multi-dimensional classifications.
and Mexico is zero miles and have horrific prison conditions and has government complicit in religious discrimination against non-catholic groups, and we do a third of a trillion dollars in trade with them. Do you even have a point?
You can attempt to muddy the water, but the US scale of left/right is mostly focused on how much regulation is applied to capitalism, with some ancillary points as they apply to taxation and social services.
If that's how you want to define it, then sure you can have a coherent discussion on that basis. Your definition is far from universal, though.
If what you really mean is, "There has been a strong shift [towards deregulation of business] in America for the past 40 years[, which is a bad thing]" - then why not just say that? You'd probably provoke more thoughtful responses, and less tribalistic name-calling that way.
Please snip both of these brainwashed twits so they can't reproduce.