We Had All Better Hope These Scientists Are Wrong About the Planet's Future (washingtonpost.com)
Less than 24 hours since we read this dire climate study, an anonymous reader writes from a Washington Post report about several more concerning things: James Hansen, a former NASA scientist, says his new study suggests the impact of global warming will be quicker and more catastrophic than generally envisioned. The research invokes collapsing ice sheets, violent megastorms and even the hurling of boulders by giant waves in its quest to suggest that even 2 degrees Celsius of global warming above pre-industrial levels would be far too much. Hansen has called it the most important work he has ever done. "I think almost everybody who is really familiar with both paleo and modern is now very concerned that we are approaching, if we have not passed, the points at which we have locked in really big changes for young people and future generations," Hansen said.
Perhaps it's because his work is based on mathematical models, research, and the scientific message. Religion is based on - believe me cuz I said so...OR DIE. There's no comparison, just your lack of intelligence on the difference between climate science and religion. I'd call you stupid, but that'd probably go over your head.
The Rothschilds, (Already worth trillions of dollars) want even more money by taxing you for your carbon footprint
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdqNds9pNuI
Their dream is to tax everyone for exhaling a perfectly healthy gas in this manner. In order to accomplish this goal, they need to lie, cheat, and fearmonger everyone into submission, so that you give up more natural rights in order to serve their profits.
Bullshit. You peak oil nuts keep pushing the timeline every time we point out you are fools.
This is why AGW pseudo-skeptics are like Creationists. No matter how many times you demonstrate some meme they brainlessly repeat was never true, they just turn around and make the same claim again. You simply cannot debate someone who is so divorced from reality that they think some slogan they picked up off a Heartland-funded website somehow falsifies an entire scientific discipline.
As a deep-thinking creationist, I feel a bit written off. Is it not possible to be thoughtful and a creationist? Take this article.
I would love to have a step-by-step debate with an atheist, but every time I run into a discussion, it has already devolved into emotional mud-slinging, generally by the atheists.