Steam Hacker Says More Vulnerabilities Will Be Found (arstechnica.com)
An anonymous reader shares an article on Ars Technica: The teenager who grabbed headlines earlier this week for hacking a fake game listing on to Valve's Steam store says there are "definitely" more vulnerabilities to be found in the popular game distribution service. But he won't be the one to find them, thanks to what he sees as Valve "giv[ing] so little of a shit about people's [security] findings." Ruby Nealon, a 16-year-old university student from England, says that probing various corporate servers for vulnerabilities has been a hobby of his since the age of 11. His efforts came to the attention of Valve (and the wider world) after an HTML-based hack let him post a game called "Watch paint dry" on Steam without Valve's approval over the weekend."It looks like their website hasn't been updated for years," Nealon told Ars. "Compared to even other smaller Web startups, they're really lacking. This stuff was like the lowest of the lowest hanging fruit."
I am disappointed to find out that this is not a real game. I was just imagining an 8 hour marathon multiplayer session with hundreds of players and how awesome that would be.
With all those exploitable vulnerabilities at least it will easier for indies to get their games green lit than it normaly is.
I was in university at 17, and there were several freshmen 16 years old (University of Chicago).
You are welcome on my lawn.
I'm totally unsurprised by the assertion. I honestly wonder where the hell Valve's money goes. They must be making it hand over fist, yet they can't fix their CS even though they keep promising to and they haven't made much for new games in forever. We need to get someone to infiltrate Valve and do an expose on their inner workings.
That explains a lot ;-)
I have no doubt Valve will fix this right after they have revamped their support portal.
Fisherman report there are more fish in the sea other than those they have already caught.
Skipped the last year of primary school here in the UK after my parents (rightly) decided it was a waste of time and as a result went to university at 17. I knew a few others who did the same, as well as one who went at 16 (but she was frankly weird).
Don't think it did me any harm, but having to worry about getting IDed pretty much anywhere except the college bar (which just assumed everybody was 18+) for the first few months kinda sucked.
University of Chicago is a little different. They admitted a student in 2003 who was 12 years old, who went on to get his PhD at 18 and his MD at 21.
https://youtu.be/SsOs-26lhEQ
Every year, there are still a handful of incoming freshmen who are under 18. Back in my day, there were usually more. I was one. My last research assistant before I retired was 19 when she worked for me and 16 when she was admitted.
You are welcome on my lawn.