Slashdot Mirror


Icelandic Prime Minister Resigns After Panama Data Leak (bloomberg.com)

Omar Valdimarsson, reporting for Bloomberg: The Panama secrecy leak claimed its first scalp after Icelandic Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson resigned following revelations about his personal finances. The decision was announced in parliament after the legislature had been the focus of street protests that attracted thousands of Icelanders angered by the alleged tax evasion of their leader. Gunnlaugsson, who will step down a year before his term was due to end, gave in to mounting pressure from the opposition and even from corners of his own party. The Panama documents leak, printed in newspapers around the world, showed that the 41-year-old premier and his wife had investments placed in the British Virgin Islands, which included debt in Iceland's three failed banks. An article on The Guardian sheds more light on this: The leaked documents from the Mossack Fonseca law firm show Gunnlaugsson and his wife, Anna Sigurlaug Palsdottir, bought a British Virgin Islands-based offshore company, Wintris Inc, in December 2007 to invest her share of the proceeds of the sale of her father's business, Iceland's only Toyota importer. Gunnlaugsson sold his 50% stake to his wife for a symbolic $1 at the end of 2009, eight months after he was elected to parliament as an MP for the centre-right Progressive party. He failed, however, to declare an interest in the company either then or when he became prime minister in 2013. His office has said his shareholding was an error due simply to the couple having a joint bank account and that it had "always been clear to both of them that the prime minister's wife owned the assets." The transfer of ownership was made as soon as this was pointed out, a spokesman said. The prime minister denies he was required to declare an interest.

39 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. wow, they have a real accountable democracy by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kinda cold for me and I'm not a huge pickled fish eater but otherwise they always sound great.

    1. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The difference between a "joint checking" and separated accounts is merely a formality and not one of any real significance. Pretending it is enough separation is functionally idiotic.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 5, Informative

      Keep in mind this is the same country that allowed banks to fail and threw the bankers responsible in jail during the 2008 crisis. Everyone predicted their economy would implode, but actually recovered more quickly than several other European countries.

      I imagine the sting from that has made them more wary of even a hint of corruption, which is oddly starting to reverberate through the US after TARP, TPP, and now no real recovery in sight.

    3. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is not in the slightest the issue.

      First off, this government's popularity has gone totally down the drain because of their continued efforts to enrich themselves and their friends at the expense of the nation (selling off bank assets in no-bid auctions at a tiny fraction of their value to family members of government officials, fighting to get Iceland expanded fishing quotas and then just handing them off to the fishing barons, etc), their continuous attempts to stifle press freedom, and countless other things. The prime minister's, before this incident, was in polls the choice of only 12% of the electorate. This is just the latest outrage in a long string of them.

      Now, for the actual issue. Simmi and his wealthy wife, back before the financial crash, set up an offshore shell company to secretly buy shares in the three large Icelandic banks that turned out, one year later, to go catastrophically belly-up. Now the two of them (50-50 owners in the company) were creditors, scrambling with the other creditors over the right to the remains of the banks. They were what we refer to as "vultures". But this was in secret.

      Then Simmi ran for office as the head of Framsóknarflokkurinn (Progress Party), a right-populist party (some might call it the "Idiot Party", as they run every year on some variant of "We're going to give you TONS OF MONEY, and nobody's going to have to pay for it, not EVERS!"). His big thing was that he was part of a group fighting against the wicked vultures trying to pick Iceland dry. When in actuality, of course, he was a vulture.

      We haven't gotten to the problem part yet.

      Because then he was elected. And the regulations (beyond general conflict of interest) are that if you own more than a 25% stake in an investment company, you have to disclose it. He was prime minister for months before he did anything. And that "doing something" was not to disclose his secret holdings, but to sell them to his wife for $1 (which still didn't remove the conflict of interest).

      Still not to the problem part.

      Because as the head of the government, he then pursued policies to get 2B euro of money that otherwise would have gone to the state to instead go to the creditors. "The creditors" including his wife and other secret accounts owned by other members of the governing coalition.

      Basically, he robbed the country to make up for his investment losses.

      Furthermore, people, stop the whoop-di-doo about his resignation. Because he's just stepping back to running the party behind the scenes while one of his ministers is taking over. The governing coalition isn't leaving. Actually Simmi reportedly tried to break the coalition, but the president wouldn't let him. Now he says that the president is lying about that, that he never planned to break it.

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
    4. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Describing an off shore account in a tax shelter as a "checking account" is like describing an industrial electromagnet as a "fridge magnet".

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pickled fish isn't widely eaten here. A commonly eaten thing you're not used to is harðfiskur, which is basically fish jerky. But most food here is pretty standard western fare...probably the most commonly eaten food here is pizza.

      Now, if you want weird stuff, we've got no shortage of options! Want rotten ammonia-reeking poisonous shark? You can have it with some fermented whale and sheep head if you'd like....

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
    6. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      That's exactly why straightforward democracy is almost always a bad idea

      Yeah, sucks to have Trump as your figurehead, eh?

      What are you talking about? We're not even through the primary process yet, and he doesn't have (and quite possibly will not get) enough of his party's votes to assure him that he will be the party's nominee. How a private organization like a political party runs its own affairs - with regard to putting forward a candidate in an actual general election - has nothing whatsoever to do with the charter of the country or one's position on pure democracy vs. constitutional republicanism etc. It's a private association! It's no different than the local Chevy Vega Fan Club deciding how they'll name and elect someone to be at the head of their own club. That's why the process that Hillary Clinton is banking on looks so different ... because the private association she's associated herself with (the Democrat party) has a different set of internal rules when it comes to putting their collective weight behind a candidate. Just like the Greens have their own way of doing it.

      How is it you're so poorly informed about this? Please don't do anything dangerous to the rest of us, like voting in the general election.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      He sold the asset in question to his wife for one dollar, and the mere fact that his wife still held that asset as he was assuring that funds intended to shore up Icelandic banks was instead redirected to creditors pretty much makes this a case of out and out corruption. You can't just get rid of a conflict of interest by selling your assets to your spouse, particularly when the actual sale was for such a nominal fee that it raises the question as to whether it was even a legitimate transfer.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trump won't get the nod. Even if they have to bring in Romney as an attempted at a controlled landing (as opposed to a complete crash), they won't let Trump on the ballot.

      The GOP knows it won't win the White House in November. That ship has sailed with Cruz and Trump as the leading contenders. Now it's about preserving the party against the inevitable Trump/anti-Trump wars that will follow Trump's departure.

      For fuck's sake, even Sanders would beat Trump.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly. I can't think of any jurisdiction, at least in the West, where selling your holdings to your spouse for a dollar somehow means the conflict of interest goes away. This is the kind of idiotic scam someone about to go bankrupt would try, and with the same result. Handing it over to your spouse doesn't make the conflict go away.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tax shelters have probably been around forever. They are more sophisticated these days simply because financial systems are more complex, and reporting requirements far greater than they were in the past. Like any scam, tax dodges have to invoke more and more misdirection as investigators gain better powers.

      There is a case to be made, however, that these tax shelters are a symptom of the rule makers working in their own self-interest, and creating taxation rules that benefit them. And that's why leaks like this are so important, because in the case of systemic fraud, about the only way you close the holes is by generating a lot of outrage.

      Look at Switzerland, whose banking industry was notorious for decades for helping everyone from despots to drug cartels hide cash. For chrissake, even the Nzis were stowing gold they'd stolen from the Jews they were marching off to the gas chambers in Swiss banks. It was only after sustained pressure from international agencies and governments like the US that Switzerland finally began to close the loopholes. And it wouldn't surprise if that's why these tax shelters have become more popular. As the older means of hiding your cash from the taxman (or in some cases, the police) dried up, more sophisticated rackets were formulated.

      For me, as bad as it is that rich and powerful people are doing this, the real target here should be the bankers, lawyers and accountants of dozens of countries who set up these schemes. While it will doubtless please the mob that a few politicians and international types fall over this, I'd like to see murky investment scheme organizations like Mossack Fonseca & Co. torn wide open. Otherwise, the people that create these dodges and shelters will just regroup and build some new schemes.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    11. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      As much as I would like to believe he won't get the nod, the reality is that they will run Trump if he gets enough votes. He's got too many votes to ignore him. The only chance they have is if every single other delegate and important member of the party gets behind one already serious candidate (realistically, only Cruz meets the criteria) and try to upset the convention.

      A candidate that comes out of the convention needs to be one of the three who are running. Otherwise, the candidate will have no legitimacy at all. This isn't the 19th Century where you can push out a candidate who was worked out in a back room deal. We all know who got most of the votes, sadly.

      I agree that they might try and put forth someone like Cruz instead of Trump to maintain control of the party for the future, but either way, I think their only real chance of a general election win is Kaisch, but he only won one state in the primary. Putting him out at the nominee would guarantee that Trump would go independent and break the Republican base.

      So, I for one welcome our new Democratic overlord, Queen Clinton II.

    12. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Rei · · Score: 2

      Heh, Bernie is actually pretty popular here. (Yes, we do follow US politics :) ).

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
    13. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fram: Forward ("frahm")
      Sókn: Attack ("soak")
      Framsókn: Progress ("FRAHM-soak")
      Framsóknar: Of progress ("FRAHM-soak-nar")
      Flokkur: Political party (also group, class, category, etc) ("FLOCK-er")
      Flokkurinn: The political party ("FLOCK-er-in")
      Framsóknarflokkurinn: The political party of progress, AKA the Progress Party ("FRAHM-soak-nar-Flock-er-in") :)

      which just the word looks like a band of vikings sharing a flagon of mead and a haunch of smoked meat.

      Maybe a bottle of brennivín and some hangikjöt being consumed by HafTHór Júlíus? ;)

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
    14. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

      They did the transfer the day before a new law that would have required disclosure; the transfer didn't do anything to the conflict of interest, but it did prevent him from being required to disclose it, and kept it secret until this leak.

      Nobody ever claimed the purpose was to remove the conflict of interest.

    15. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I'd say deliberately trying to obscure a conflict of interest at the very least underscores the fact that they were well aware that there was a conflict.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    16. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Informative

      The funny part is him trying to dissolve Parliament preemptively before they could even take up his scandal, and the President's blocking of that action. That's the real reason he had to resign suddenly; his ass-covering maneuver failed spectacularly, and Parliament was going to be really, really pissed.

      The cover-up attempt bit a lot quicker than the scandal.

    17. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      What's hilarious is that you can't actually point out which part is delusional. Is it that individual party primaries aren't part of the governing process? Are you confused about that? Are you thinking that I'm delusional because it's possible Trump won't get the numbers necessary to win the nomination without debate? No? Or are you just another person who has to resort to lame, juvenile ad hominem in order to distract from the fact that someone is calling you on your nonsense? Be specific, address the topics mentioned and point out where and why they're "delusional," or just admit you're blathering and saying nothing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:wow, they have a real accountable democracy by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      At least some of the delegates feel bound to vote for who their populations voted for, which is the candidate who sent them there.

      You say that as if we have any precedent for what a contested convention would look like, but it hasn't happened since the parties adopted the current primary system in the 70s. Most of the delegates haven't even been selected yet, and the state parties have a lot of control over that process. They could easily (and likely will) choose delegates who are opposed to Trump.

      If he loses the first ballot, don't be surprised if he loses the nomination altogether. Technically, the delegates could even unbind themselves on the first ballot, since they will first have to decide on the convention rules, although that's highly unlikely and could potentially end the GOP as we know it.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  2. Pirate Party by doconnor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of interest to Slashdotters is that the Pirate Party of Iceland currently has a generous lead in the polls if an early election is called.

    1. Re:Pirate Party by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Odd. I feel like pirates would be much more likely to have their booty buried in Panama.

    2. Re:Pirate Party by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Fuck that! Turks and Caicos are going to become the eleventh Canadian province! Time for Canada to actually have a nice little domestic tax shelter to counter the six or seven that Britain runs!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Pirate Party by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Trivia on the subject. The Icelandic name for the Pirate Party is "Píratapartýið" But that's not Icelandic for "Pirate Party" - pirate is "sjóræningur" and political party is "flokkur". "Pírati" is an Icelandification of "Pirate" as in the international Pirate Party movement (they wanted to differentiate themselves from literal pirates), while "partý" is a loanword for the type of party where you go out and have fun (not the political kind).

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
  3. Upheaval by lazarus · · Score: 2

    Iceland has had its fair share of political upheaval post 2008. Fantastic country though -- I highly recommend a visit.

    These are a very stoic people. They live on a volcanic island that is essentially trying every day to kill them off. In Iceland you can actually see the effect that the environment has on a population. They have some of the most dangerous roads I have ever seen in the world and absolutely no guard rails or for that matter not even much in the way of signs. You can hike out to the West cost of the island (which is the Westernmost point of Europe) and look down to the sea -- which is more than half a kilometer straight down. No railing. No signs. Not even a small rope. Just a nice grassy pleasant stroll until you just walk off the edge and plunge to your death. It's completely fantastic there.

    They take this same stoic (you fuck up, you pay the price) view of their politicians and their banks.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:Upheaval by postmortem · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but westernmost point of Europe is in Portugal, as you can see for yourself here:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Upheaval by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

      Iceland has zero diversity. It's all white, all the time. They are also 87% Christian, Islamophobia seems popular there. The other Scandinavian countries are having great success with immigration adding value to their countries, Iceland is culturally backwards and stuck in the 20th century.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Upheaval by Rei · · Score: 2

      . No railing. No signs. Not even a small rope. Just a nice grassy pleasant stroll until you just walk off the edge and plunge to your death.

      Natural selection.

      No, seriously, why should we cordon off everything that could hurt you? We'd be cordoning off the whole country....

      That said, if tourists keep dying at Reynisfjara we might have to do something. Apparently the sign at the parking lot warning of rogue waves isn't enough to stop people from... well, getting swept out into rough, cold, shark-infested waters by rogue waves.

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
    4. Re:Upheaval by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Iceland has a higher percentage immigrants than Europe on average - more than all the other Nordics except Sweden. The second to fourth (it varies) most common immigrant nationality in Iceland is filipino. Despite high church registration, Iceland consistently polls as one of the least religious countries in the world, with one recent poll finding that not a single young person in the hundred-something that they polled backed a creationist worldview over that of the Big Bang. Iceland has been far more welcoming to immigrants during the immigrant crisis than mainland Europe.

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
  4. Give Islanders credit by Lucas123 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Iceland's citizenry turned out by the thousands to protest their PM's refusal to resign after the Panama Papers revealed his corruption. The Kremlin on the other hand has already called the Panama Papers a CIA plot, (big surprise there). Hopefully, if the Panama Papers do reveal Putin used a shell to hide his money, Russia's citizens will not stand for it and force his hand. Let's hope other nation's citizens follow suit, including here in the U.S.

    1. Re:Give Islanders credit by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      The Kremlin on the other hand has already called the Panama Papers a CIA plot, (big surprise there). Hopefully, if the Panama Papers do reveal Putin used a shell to hide his money, Russia's citizens will not stand for it and force his hand.

      Not likely. Here's why. And I speak from personal experience. I speak Russian rather well and I've spent more time in the ex-USSR than most people who aren't from there. One of the problems with Russians in particular is that for centuries they've had this rather quaint idea that the guy at the top is a really great, caring guy and the greatest leader in the world and it's those evil underlings beneath him who are corrupt and not doing his will. There are stories of peasants in the old days of the Tsars who would be abused or even killed by the Tsar's henchmen and the peasants would say "If only the Tsar knew what was happening! He'd save us!" when in fact the henchmen were expressly carrying out his orders on them. Stalin was an extraordinarily evil man. I know in the West it's popular to say that Hitler was the most evil man ever, but I think Stalin may actually have been worse. Well, maybe not if you're Jewish, but still you could make a strong case for Stalin being worse and I think we in the West could agree he was really really bad even if less bad than Hitler. You wouldn't have to walk far at all in Russia to find people telling you what a great guy Stalin was and how they wish he was still around. Khrushchev was easily the greatest leader of the USSR and nobody generally thinks very much of him over there. The USSR peaked under Khrushchev and it was all downhill before him and after him, but Stalin is The Man to many Russians. Putin is thought to be just a fantastic guy who has incompetent, greedy people under him who have hidden their crimes from him (yet somehow the fact that the citizens know what these underlings have done and Putin doesn't know doesn't make them question Putin's fitness to run the show there) and if he, like the peasant oppressing Tsar before him, only knew what was really happening, he would surely fix it. While some report that Putin's popularity is dropping and it may be true, I don't expect any changes. I had a lot of hope for Medvedev and while I think he was a genuinely good president for Russia, I've been pretty disappointed with a lot of things he's said now as PM and I just don't know if he's just saying what Putin wants to hear or if Medvedev really believes what he says now. The alternatives in Russia actually may be worse than Putin with some really nutso nationalists who'd like to provoke a war with the US and/or Europe and maybe even China. I expect most citizens to believe that Putin did nothing wrong and this to die down pretty quickly.

  5. Re:Nordic honesty. by Opportunist · · Score: 3

    Well, at least their politicians still have the decency to resign when they get caught with the hand in the cookie jar instead of shrugging and basically saying "And what you're gonna do about it, plebs?"

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Re:US government targeting by Rei · · Score: 2

    Right, because the US wants to get rid of the conservatives in Iceland and install the Pirates? Is that what you think is going on? The Pirates who want to give Snowden citizenship?

    --
    If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
  7. Re:Soros is behind this by Rei · · Score: 2

    First off, his name is not "Gunnlaugsson". That's not a last name, it's a patronymic. It just means that his father's name is Gunnlaugur. The proper way to refer to him is Sigmundur, Sigmundur Davíð, or if you want to be "familiar", just Simmi.

    Secondly, Simmi was absolutely not an "enemy of the bankster elite". That's the whole point of this incident - he actually is a part owner of the failed banks, despite having campaigned on fighting against them.

    --
    If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
  8. Re:That's it? by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 2

    He did run for election to stop this type of corruption. Iceland was probably the nation that suffered the worst from the bank meltdowns nearly a decade ago. So its a big thing on Iceland. In most other nations it would have been a blip on the radar and nothing would have happened. But on Iceland its an important issue.

    Yesterday it was a "small" demonstration where little less then a tenth of all of icelanders was demonstrating. Ok, so it was like 25 000 people, but with a population of only 330 000 its a big deal. The politicians take notice and have to act.

    In China any mention of Panama is forbidden and I doubt Russia will change much for this. Belarus is though another place where this might affect the leadership.

    --
    Just saying it like it are.
  9. Re:US government targeting by Rei · · Score: 2

    Also a myth. The three largest banks went into receivership, but they weren't government backed; they were backed by a private fund, with the British and Dutch governments as the secondary insurers (they sued... it went to the EFTA court... the EFTA court affirmed this). But Iceland pumped tons of money into the banking system in general, raising our national debt from about 25% of GDP to around 100%. We got a stake in the banks that were in receivership due to the money we pumped in (akin to the US stakes in the auto industry during their bailout), but we sold them off at firesale prices as soon as possible to avoid any perception that there was intent to run them. The rush to sell them off lost us huge amounts of money, yet apparently people still think we nationalized them.

    This whole conflict revolves around our prime minister actually being a bank creditor and giving tons of money to bank creditors, so I'm not sure how you're trying to spin this as an attempt to punish anti-banking people. You do realize that our current governing coalition is the same parties that were governing back 2007-2008, right?

    --
    If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
  10. Re:Or.. by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    The notion of confidence is the chief reason Walter Bagehot, 150 years ago, observed the superiority of the Westminster system to the Presidential system. Short of a trial and conviction for impeachment, there's precious little Congress can do about an errant president.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  11. Re:That's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    He shouldn't have had to resign for this. That's ludicrous.

    Funneling off $2B of state money in order to benefit "corporate creditors" of banks of which he just happens to be one himself in secret is kind of a big thing in a country with fewer inhabitants than a suburb in the U.S. In particular when you won your election basically on themes fighting corporate greed and corruption.

    He probably needed to resign solely in order to be able to leave the country legally as fast as possible.

  12. Re:Nordic honesty. by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well 22k citizens of a possible total of 330k showed up to protest... 6.6% of their entire population.

    That would be the equivalent of about 22 Million people showing up outside the Whitehouse (or 2.3 Million in Ottawa) ... I'm pretty sure there would be no "And what you're gonna do about it, plebs?". More likely there were be a lot of awkward silence and a hasty departure.

    I mean a lot of people made a big deal about the "million man march"... now do that 22 times bigger. Regardless of police or military, that would make a corrupt politician pretty damn nervous....

    What is even crazier about the Iceland numbers is that 330k population includes things like babies, and the very elderly etc... Meaning that an even higher percentage of the able population showed up!

  13. Icelandic names by J'raxis · · Score: 2

    The Prime Minister is properly addressed by his first name, Sigmundur, not "Gunnlaugsson," which is not surname like we use in English but a patronymic (his father is named Gunnlaug). Icelandic name.