Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Says Model 3 Had 'Biggest One-Week Launch of Any Product Ever' (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Tesla announced Thursday that it has received 325,000 preorders for its recently unveiled Model 3. If it sells every car that's been reserved, the company says it will earn enough revenue to make this the "biggest one-week launch of any product ever." A few days ago, the electric car company was saying it had received twice the number of preorders it originally expected to get. Now it's quickly approaching three times that number, which raises questions about the company's ability to meet its increasingly complex production goals. If it can, it stands to make a boatload of money. Tesla says the number of preorders it has received so far corresponds to $14 billion in implied future sales.

270 comments

  1. Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by JoeyRox · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sounds like the reality distortion field is strong with this one.

    1. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      Oops, I missed the reference to revenue. Nevermind.

      On second thought, lets see how many of those orders that Tesla actually satisfies in a reasonable amount of time.

    2. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by fredgiblet · · Score: 3, Informative

      IIRC the $1000 is refundable if they decide to pull out reasonably soon.

    3. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the reality distortion field is strong with this one.

      ... and Morton sells more than a billion grains of salt every week.

      By "biggest" they don't mean just the number of items, but (items*price). 13 million iPhones for $500 each is still less than 325k cars at $35,000 each.

    4. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How much does an iPhone cost compared to a car? Your post is ridiculous.

    5. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 0

      Refundable until the car goes into production.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      13m * $500 average cost = 6.5bn.
      Tesla is claiming $14bn. Seems reality-based to me.

    7. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seriously. I don't want to call people "morons", but buying a car sight-unseen is bad.

      Tesla has a well earned reputation for quality. My wife has a Model-S, and it is a very nice car. Certainly the best that I have ever driven. I think most of the people placing these pre-orders can afford the $1000 deposit.

    8. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Informative

      People bought the first infinity car sight unseen when they did those stupid car commercials that didn't even show the car or talk about it. This is not even close. The Tesla 3 was demonstrated at the launch event, the internet is littered with photos and reviews by people that attended the event and got to drive one. It is still 18months before full production but the tooling is being built right now so there probably won't be significant changes before the retail model is available. The same method was used on the Model S and it changed very little.

    9. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by known_coward_69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      there are only 15 million cars sold in the USA every year. figure the dozens of models out there and this was a great launch

    10. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Tim12s · · Score: 5, Informative

      Airbus sold 85 A380 for $400m a pop. Emirates purchase 140 of them in 2015 again for $418m a pop. Thats at least 54billion in committed revenue.

    11. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      In 1.5 years.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    12. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Layzej · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They may have trouble keeping up. They hope to be able to satisfy 500,000 orders a year by 2020. They will need to fast track that considerably, but even at that rate Bloomberg says that EVs will displace over 2,000,000 barrels of oil a day by 2023. That would be enough to cause a crash in the oil market: https://youtu.be/NOPHHgJgJ2s

    13. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Well, they claim that their factory, in the last 3 months, has been producing at a rate of 500k vehicles/year.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by paiute · · Score: 2

      That would be enough to cause a crash in the oil market

      Why not divert that oil to produce electricity?

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    15. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days

      325 000 * 35 000 = 11 375 000 000

      For the iPhone 6 the prices seem to have been $199-$499, say the most common price was $300.
      13 000 000 * 300 = 3 900 000 000

      Even if you assume Apple sold as fast the rest of the week that's 3.9*7/3 = 9.1 billion which is still less than 11.4.

    16. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ranton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Refundable until the car goes into production.

      By the time the car goes into production it will not be sight unseen. There will have been opportunities for test drives just like with the last two Tesla vehicles. I put down my deposit because in the worst case scenario I have $1000 in a non-interest bearing account for a couple years, and in a best case scenario I will likely be part of the last Tesla buyers who get Federal tax credits.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    17. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't compare making iPhones to cars.

      As a better comparison, Toyota, which has a lot more money, experience and manufacturing capacity, made a little over 400,000 Camrys last year. I would be highly suspicious of Tesla's ability to build enough cars quickly enough to fulfill all those preorders in any kind of reasonable time frame.

    18. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Alomex · · Score: 5, Informative

      However, the 380 purchase was not made all at once: 21 ordered in June 2003, and another 21 in November 2003 and so on. So this doesn't meet the requirement of "biggest one week launch ever".

    19. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Layzej · · Score: 2

      The cost of solar is on a similar trajectory.

    20. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? No they don't. Their most recent statments have indicated they're still on target for producing 80,000 - 90,000 vehicles in 2016. Further, Q1 2016 production volume was only 14,820 vehicles total, which means you're off by about an order of magnitude.

    21. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Alomex · · Score: 4, Informative

      Already in the works:

      In an email sent out last night (see below), Tesla confirmed that following the overwhelming number of Model 3 reservations it received, the company is currently âoeincreasing its production plans to minimize the wait for Model 3â.

      http://electrek.co/2016/04/07/...

    22. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Very little of our electricity comes from oil, so there actually isn't much infrastructure for it. It's also not very cost effective especially with the price of oil being so volatile.

      So why not divert the oil into not pumping it out of the ground in the first place until we need it?
      =Smidge=

    23. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      In the airline industry they frequently order a whole bunch but they rarely if ever purchase that many. The contracts aren't sales contracts, they are options to purchase in the normal world. I've heard the number that 50% of those sales will never execute.

    24. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, worst case is you lose the $1000.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    25. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If they stay on schedule.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    26. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In 10 years we'll laugh at these impatient people who couldn't wait a year to get the same car at a steep discount. Like Apple line people, Cabbage Patch line people, Tickle Me Elmo line people, etc.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    27. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the reality distortion field is strong with this one.

      No distortion. Gross sales dollars, Tesla 3 325k > 13M iPhones by quite a bit...I'll let you do your own math, since you sound like you enjoy being the smart guy.

    28. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      Pick your pension fund, so many people will lose the entirety of the retirement due to purposefully corrupted investments with purchasing commissions paid in tax havens. I can bet a whole bunch of pension funds are going to get stuck with collapsing fossil fuel as well as underwater front investments. With trillions in loses you can bet billions will be paid in bribes to get managers to buy those bound to go under investments. So this seems a much safer bet for $1000 than hundreds of thousands of dollars locked in readily corrupted pension funds (keep track of the level of investment of your pension fund or superannuation to ensure they divest from at risk investments including fossil fuels and underwater front properties, early rather than too late). The rich and greedy will not tolerate that loss and they will be looking to shift those losses to the poor and middle class. They will do this via pension scams or via new financial vehicles that take over those bad assets with government guaranteed debt that are designed to collapse and push those losses onto the tax payer.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    29. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by afidel · · Score: 1

      Who is going to offer a Model 3 competitor at a "steep discount"? The closest competitor that's been launched is the Bolt, and for $2,500 more you get a smaller, less well appointed car with significantly worse styling. There's literally nobody with the technology or the battery production capacity to make a better, cheaper vehicle in the class. The only risk to the Model 3 being anything but class leading is if the timeline slips by several years and they can't ramp up production at the gigafactory enough to meet their pricing plans.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    30. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the 500k number is what they hope the plant can produce when fully equipped and running 3 shifts a day. The most NUMMI managed at the plant was a bit over 400k a year so I'd call that number optimistic for a company that's never done over 20k a month. Still if they can get to 350-400k units a year that's pretty significant.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    31. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people make far more than a thousand an hour - it's just not a big deal bro. You'll never understand.

    32. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elon Musk is a pretty smart guy. Probably the smartest auto company CEO ever. I think he'll do it.

    33. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "in one week" do you not understand?

    34. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, we won't laugh at the people pulling $2 million a year. But then my question would be, why are you reserving the piece of shit model when you could drive off with a real one right now? No, these people are not rich - they are just impatient and caught up in fashion and hype.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      You are comparing what is available right now, this instant with something that - if it comes to fruition - will not be available for several years. All talk of costs and availability are speculative and frankly don't matter at all. Tesla makes a nice luxury car - I'm a big fan even if I'm not in the market. I might even buy one of these new cheaper Teslas someday. But I'm sure as hell not buying from the first production run, and I'm certainly going to wait for demand to meet supply so that the price comes down. Look how cheaply you can buy a used Leaf compared to the MSRP (tax rebate included), especially now with gas prices in the basement.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    36. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      The market returns around 7% on average. At best you will get 0% on this investment, and you'll overpay just for the honor of getting the first buggy models off of the assembly line. Good luck. I'll pick the 2nd year model up on the used market for 2/3 the price, because I'm not in a hurry to look cool.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    37. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up and flip my burger. Nobody is paying you minimum wage to sit around and dream about things you'll never achieve.

    38. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just makes you a complete idiot willing to believe anything, no matter how ridiculous the claim.

    39. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Except the markup on an iphone is astronomical. It costs them less than $100 to make one.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    40. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      But I'm sure as hell not buying from the first production run

      So then you are relying on the early adopters, the very people you are denigrating, to lead the way.

    41. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Indeed. It's worse than that - I depend on some percentage of them not making the payments so that I can steal their almost-new cars at a steep discount. Fortunately, my post denigrating them on Facebook is unlikely to deter them - in fact, psychologically they are likely to double down and stand in an Apple line. The $1000 is a low-pass filter to separate out the people who can only afford to stand in line for sneakers.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by haruchai · · Score: 2

      "the piece of shit model" - so more affordable means piece of shit?
      And you want to buy it 2ndhand? Or the hand-me-down of the Leaf which is truly shite, when new, compared to any Tesla.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    43. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If you look at the context of my comment it will make sense. The AC is claiming that rich people who won't miss $1000 are buying these. That's horseshit - those people can spend $100k on a real Tesla. I think this new model will probably be nicer than a Chevy or a Leaf, but compared to the S it will indeed be shit.

      The best analogy I could offer is people waiting in line at Walmart for a new line of low-cost Louis Vutton bags. Those aren't the rich people - the rich people already have the expensive Louis Vutton bags.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    44. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by lgw · · Score: 1

      Tesla does use robots far more than the Nummi plant did, humans are used mostly for the finishing touches. Robotic production scales well. I doubt their approach of using prison labor to save on costs will scale, though.

      Really, it's battery availability that's he bottleneck - what's the schedule on the gigafactory?
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    45. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And those 13 million iphones aren't anywhere near as much money as 325k cars selling for 35-60k apiece.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    46. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I think the Titanic made a bigger splash at its launch...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    47. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So why not divert the oil into not pumping it out of the ground in the first place until we need it?

      Good luck with that. Someone somewhere with oil will decide they need money, and they will go forth and make some with it. You can only get so far borrowing against the notion that someday someone will pay you even more for the oil because they need it to make seals for spaceships or whatever. There's always the risk that they'll come up with an organic technology that replaces your petro products and then... you know the rest.

      Sooner or later somebody is going to figure out how to make oil out of seawater and air and unicorn farts really cheaply, and then big oil is fucked sideways. Or really, they could just basically be legislated out of existence. Until then, they are going to milk the situation for as much as it's worth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    48. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The market returns around 7% on average. At best you will get 0% on this investment, and you'll overpay just for the honor of getting the first buggy models off of the assembly line. Good luck.

      No, at best you get to buy a $35k car for $27,500 instead of $35k like everyone who did not put $1000 down. That is a pretty good deal. Even if your car isn't delivered until 6 quarters after the 200,001st Tesla is delivered, the tax incentive is still $1875. That is still quite the return on investment.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    49. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are comparing what is available right now, this instant with something that - if it comes to fruition - will not be available for several years. All talk of costs and availability are speculative and frankly don't matter at all.

      Now hooooold on thar. This is not Tesla's first trip around the block. That was true of the roadster, it was true to an extent of the Model S, and it was slightly true of the Model X since it included a bunch of new kit. The only new thing in the new car is the big piece of glass, which could even get toned down before production if there was a problem. Since they've made a couple of cars, established relationships with suppliers, and generally figured out what they are doing, they should have reasonably little trouble hitting this target.

      I might even buy one of these new cheaper Teslas someday. But I'm sure as hell not buying from the first production run, and I'm certainly going to wait for demand to meet supply so that the price comes down.

      All of that is reasonable, although you'll be missing out on the tax credit that at least some of the early depositors will receive.

      Look how cheaply you can buy a used Leaf compared to the MSRP (tax rebate included), especially now with gas prices in the basement.

      A lot of people are not buying the Tesla primarily to save money on gas, but because of all the other reasons why they are good cars and/or status symbols. They don't care about gas prices. It's still cheaper to drive an EV, and the people who get money from the government for buying one are getting the car for a very average car price rather than paying a substantial premium for the privilege.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also rear wheel drive. It's as if they don't want people in northern climates driving them

    51. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I can think of something worse than that.

    52. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days. Sounds like the reality distortion field is strong with this one.

      Sounds like the comprehension skills are weak with this one.
      13 million x $800 is less than 325000 x $35000

    53. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Airbus sold 85 A380 for $400m a pop.

      In one weekend?

    54. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many will cancel when they find out they don't get the tax rebate?

    55. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC the $1000 is refundable if they decide to pull out reasonably soon.

      Pulling out reasonably soon is not what people are generally good at.

    56. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      They may have trouble keeping up. They hope to be able to satisfy 500,000 orders a year by 2020. They will need to fast track that considerably, but even at that rate Bloomberg says that EVs will displace over 2,000,000 barrels of oil a day by 2023. That would be enough to cause a crash in the oil market

      Oh goodie! That means cheap gas for years to come for my big 6.2L V8 engine! :)

      This of course completely undercuts the whole "most cars will go EV due to rising gas prices".

      No, gas prices will go lower, not higher, if even 10% of cars sold become EV, thus putting a cap on EV sales due to gas being so cheap.

      Gas cars will still be sold in the year 2100.

    57. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      there are only 15 million cars sold in the USA every year. figure the dozens of models out there and this was a great launch

      Last year 17.5 million cars and light trucks were sold in the US.

      But so what? Tesla's pre-orders are world-wide, not in the US.

      World-wide, 75 million cars were sold last year.

      And Tesla will take several years to deliver all these cars.

      So maybe 150,000 cars the first year, vs 75 million world wide.

      Nice, but nothing earth shattering, and even 150,000 cars is still triple what they are doing now.

    58. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Sique · · Score: 1

      Yes, gas cars will be sold. But only in homeopathic doses. Introducing electric cars comes partly in parallel with some other introductions, like self driving cars. Self driving cars make it less economic to own a car yourself, as 95% of the time, any private car sits idling in some garage or parking lot. So in general it makes no sense to own a car, if there was a way to reuse a car simply and without to many waiting and transferring times. With self driving cars, this will be easy. Whenever you need one, you phone/text/web-order your car provider, and it comes to you like a cab, but without any driver. And whenever you don't need it anymore, you just leave it, and it will drive automaticly to the next parking lot or the next customer. And those ad hoc rental cars will be mostly electric, because electric cars require much less maintenance due to less mechanics (no gear boxes, no cludges...), and automatic charging is easier than automatic fuelling. And charging can be done whenever the electric power is cheap, because the windmills are running, the solar panels are shined on or whatever power source is currently working.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    59. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by St.Creed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't forget that after the USA cars have been delivered, the rest of the world gets it. And they have different tax rules. And after that, if noone is in the queue anymore because all orders stop today, *then* you might get one. Might.

      For tax reasons, I'm putting down $1000. That's a bit less in euro's and it provides me with a chance at a company car in my own company, that has no additional "car tax" of 60%, that has a very low "road use tax", that has (due to environmental taxes) just a third of the fuel cost of my current Prius, that will come with a tax rebate of 25% in addition to the other stuff. Oh, and maintenance cost are near zero. And if I drive it as a business car, it will only count towards personal income with 4% of the car's original value as opposed to 25% for regular cars.

      So, I'm putting down $1000 dollar which in the worst case I will get just back (Tesla isn't going to go bankrupt when they can get a loan based on 14 billion dollar worth of pre-orders) without interest. In the best case I get what looks like the best car on the planet (*) for half the price of a regular car. That's not a bad opportunity cost at all.

      (*) I used to drive a Mercedes when I worked for the company - the model S is a MUCH better car than the Mercedes S-class and Tesla is also much better for its customers.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    60. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by St.Creed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I understand your analogy, but in what way do you think this model will be shit? The specs already look much better than top of the line cars. Compared to the S, it's shorter. But most of the features of an S will still be on it.

      Tesla doesn't have to do the regular "screw the customer" dance that I hated so much when working at Mercedes. They don't have to intentionally make a cheaper car less luxurious in order to justify the overpriced "luxury model". They don't have to avoid putting in a navigation so you have to put down $8000,- for the integrated navigation that's worse than the $100 garmin you buy in the store. They don't have to worry about cannibalizing sales of the model S and model X. Tesla can just sell the model 3 and make it as good as they possibly can, and become a huge car maker in the process because the competition is scared to match it.

      The only company with a chance of catching up is Chevrolet and if you look at the Bolt you see the same attitude: it's intentionally made worse than it could be to avoid hitting the sales of their other cars. So if you base your attitude on the long standing practice of other carmakers I understand that. But Tesla is just not in the same position, and has a different strategy. So to assume the model 3 will be any less than the model S except in range and size is an assumption I don't share.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    61. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Smidge204 · · Score: 2

      Good luck with that. Someone somewhere with oil will decide they need money, and they will go forth and make some with it.

      Except that's not going to work if there's no market for it.

      Earlier this year the cost of producing bitumen (tar sands oil) exceeded the market value. The plants remained in operation only because they were gambling that the price would rise again and the cost of shutting down/restarting everything would be greater than a potential short-term loss. Tar sands oil is currently a financial loser.

      Now imagine what would happen if the market crashed again due to lack of demand. You really think they'd keep it up?

      Also, historically, OPEC has colluded to DECREASE production for the sake of stabilizing the price. The only reason they haven't done so lately is (I'm speculating) to hurt non OPEC producers. If that's true, it's working.
      =Smidge=

    62. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I don't want to call people "morons", but buying a car sight-unseen is bad.

      Which is good because that's not what people have done, and if you managed to mistake putting down a refundable deposit for buying it would look like throwing stones from glass houses.

    63. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by rkcth · · Score: 1

      The model S is rear wheel drive as well and handles well in snow. The reason it does well is a combination of excellent traction control, combined with the weight distribution. In a combustion engine vehicle the engine is in the front l, typically. So rear wheel drive has poor traction since the weight is located in the wrong area. Also front wheel drive is prone to fish tailing when braking, rear wheel drive experiences much less of that (though traction control does a good job minimizing that for both FWD and RWD.

    64. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas cars will still be sold in the year 2100.

      Yeah, but no one will be buying them. Why buy a gas car when you can get an electric at that time with 3 times the range for cheaper?

    65. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by rhazz · · Score: 1

      If entrenched interests don't legislate them into oblivion.

    66. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It is impressive, though. You not liking Tesla has no bearing on that.

    67. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, my post denigrating them on Facebook is unlikely to deter them

      And here I thought I was the only person on the internet posting elegantly brilliant ideas that everyone else ignores! My sympathies to you. Keep at it and one day your ....facebook post.... will surely unite us all!

    68. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Haha, see what happens when you hook too many tubes up to your computer?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    69. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's almost like I said that it was only $1000 in the very next sentence. Did you get so angry that you stopped reading my 3 sentence post?

      By the way, it's only refundable until the car goes into production. And it's not refundable at all if the company goes tits-up.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    70. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      but in what way do you think this model will be shit?

      Let's not get too hung up on the hypothetical quality of this future car. The point is that "price is no object" people making $2,000,000 or so a year would just buy a Tesla S. They'd have their personal assistant go to the website and buy one. What's this waiting list for the cheap one crap?

      As I said, I like Teslas and - pending an actual test drive and some road time on the platform - could very well see myself buying one of these cheaper models. Used, of course :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    71. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Self driving cars make it less economic to own a car yourself, as 95% of the time, any private car sits idling in some garage or parking lot. So in general it makes no sense to own a car, if there was a way to reuse a car simply and without to many waiting and transferring times. With self driving cars, this will be easy. Whenever you need one, you phone/text/web-order your car provider, and it comes to you like a cab, but without any driver. And whenever you don't need it anymore, you just leave it, and it will drive automaticly to the next parking lot or the next customer.

      I've seen many people suggest that, including that guy on Shark Tank who invested in Uber.

      There will, of course, be some of that... but I don't think it'll be nearly as common as you suspect it will be. People like to own stuff, people like things that are theirs.

      There is value in having a vehicle where you left it, in the condition you left it, with your stuff in it, that no one else as farted in, eaten in, or done anything else in.

      Yes, our vehicles sit 95% of the time, but they don't doing nothing during that time. They are waiting, for us, at our beck and call. In the next 30 seconds, I can be outside driving somewhere if I want to be. My seat will be where I left it. The radio is turned to what I left it. There is no food, trash, etc. in there. The inside smells nice, and it is in beautiful condition because it doesn't drive all day.

      because electric cars require much less maintenance due to less mechanics

      They require less mechanical maintenance, but you're ignoring cosmetic maintenance. Look at police cars and taxi cabs. They only get a few years before they are completely trashed. Any vehicle driven all day doesn't last long from that point of view. This is why car rental companies turn their vehicles over so often, they would get quite trashed otherwise.

    72. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't know what laws you have to deal with locally. In the USA, this purchase would not make any economic sense. You can go out and buy an electric vehicle right now - enjoying all of the benefits that you list - and drive it until the Tesla becomes available. And if Tesla is truly selling them at below market rate, clever entrepreneurs will take that money directly out of their pockets and resell the cars for whatever they are really worth. History shows that this will be significantly lower than the MSRP. In the US, you can get a used Leaf for $14-20k. And that's barely used, a few hundred to a few thousand miles on it.

      So you could take your $1000, put it towards driving a Leaf for 3 years, saving all of that $$$ that you laid out, and have way more money to put into your eventual Tesla purchase.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    73. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are going to do worst case scenarios you should do a worst case for market returns to meaning a negative number. especially considering the relatively short time frame at last short in terms of the market.

    74. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      It's also rear wheel drive. It's as if they don't want people in northern climates driving them

      You didn't RTFA. It will come in RWD and AWD. And besides, I drove RWD cars for years in the north east. It's not an issue if you know how to drive.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    75. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      but compared to the S it will indeed be shit.

      You're not being imaginative; it shouldn't take a visionary to figure out that Musk will market the Model 3 at various price-points; there'll be the $40,000+ Model 3 and there'll be the $110,000+ Model 3 with ~750hp+ (likely announced some time after the Model S gets upgraded to 1000hp!) and obviously there'll be a variety of options in between... and as for its differences with the Model S, while I myself am partial to larger, heavier vehicles (I drive a '15 Suburban, for fuck's sake), the laws of physics alone dictate that the impressive performance of this lighter, smaller "2nd-gen Model S" is going to be foregone fucking conclusion.

    76. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      They use the $1000 to hire goons to rape you with a branding iron?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    77. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      they should have reasonably little trouble hitting this target.

      They have two HUGE new barriers to production:

      • Cost
      • Quantity

      Those are new things for Tesla, and I am optimistic but also realistic. They have never made anything in high volume, nor have they ever made a commodity car.

      All of that is reasonable, although you'll be missing out on the tax credit that at least some of the early depositors will receive.

      The tax credit gets reflected in the used price. Or at least it seems to in other electric cars. To be totally fair to Tesla, their cars do seem to hold up fairly well on the used market - but they are luxury cars which carry a 4 year warranty used. A used Leaf is $14-20k with just a few miles on it - the previous owner did not see any benefit from the tax credit because they lost their shirt on the used market.

      why they are good cars and/or status symbols

      I totally agree. You can't make economic sense of this, but people are trying. You can only make emotional sense of this. Hey, it's their money.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    78. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      It is impressive, though. You not liking Tesla has no bearing on that.

      It is a shame that you can't see beyond that... double shame that you think I don't like Tesla...

      I don't like or dislike them, I'm rather indifferent to them.

      I do know that they haven't yet done all the things people want to rush and give them credit for. I do know that it isn't nearly as easy as you'd think, but it is possible.

      If Tesla pulls it off, good for them. If they don't, so be it. But we are years away from that either way, don't put the cart before the horse.

    79. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Tell me, how much do you know about the parts-count of a Camry vs that of a Model 3? :)

    80. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I might suggest that you are ignoring the used value of the car. Unless you plan on driving it into the ground, you will eventually have to sell it. The used price will reflect the lower "actual" price of the vehicle. The subsidy is real, but (a least part of) the savings to the end user is merely a deferred cost. A Leaf has an MSRP of $30k, but the highest price you'll fetch on the used market after driving it off the lot is around $20k. So yeah, you "saved" $7500 that the used market immediately accounted for.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    81. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but no one will be buying them. Why buy a gas car when you can get an electric at that time with 3 times the range for cheaper?

      There is no assurance that will happen.

      You also assume we will continue to have cheap electricity.

    82. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      When you remove $50k or so from the price of the vehicle, something has to give. Sure, the battery will get cheaper to produce. Volume production should help as well. But $50k is a big number. In any case, the point of my comment wasn't to call it a "piece of shit" so much as to point out that a richie-rich will just buy the expensive Tesla and won't bother waiting in line.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    83. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I would never recommend the market for a short term investment. I was just pointing it out as a baseline.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    84. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by torkus · · Score: 1

      In 10 years they will still be driving. A 10-year old iPhone will not be phoning.

      You're comparing durable goods with non-durable goods which is a fundamentally flawed position.

      Tesla takes it even further by not coming out with a "new" version of the same car every year to attract buyers. They don't need to for one, and it's a huge, HUGE long-term benefit to buyers when it comes to maintenance and support.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    85. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by torkus · · Score: 1

      Comparing something which hasn't been delivered with something that's not nearly as good.

      It's a crummy comparison but still a valid one. Does anyone ELSE have production plans, designs, or the capability of launching the 3 before Tesla?

      If so let me know because I will buy as much of their stock as I can afford...but in reality the answer is a resounding 'no.' There's several options for quirky first-gen type EVs with limited range and old-school detroit thinking. Tesla is building what amounts to a second-gen EV...or perhaps third-gen as the roadster as arguably more capable than "modern" EVs from any other manufacturer.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    86. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      nope. It is refundable until they have you decide how to configure it. And that is about .5-2 months ahead of delivery.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    87. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by torkus · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, next year's bolt will fix at least 5 of the 500 problems.

      The year after 10 more but introduce 6 new ones.

      While a bit tongue-in-cheek, the underlying point remains. Car manufacturers very intentionally provide minor incremental upgrades every year and then a "large" upgrade every ~5 or so when they "refresh" a car. They simply cannot release a vehicle that breaks that tradition without interrupting the fundamentals of their whole business model.

      Tesla sells a car that costs more up-front, has an impressive feature set that would generally cost more in a gas-based vehicle (if you could even find it), gets FREE upgrades that do a lot more than just fix an ignition problem that kills people, have very low maintenance (battery pack has been a worry since the Roadster yet we haven't heard any horror stories), and they sell as many as they can manufacture without having to resort to tweaking a body panel slightly every year.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    88. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      actually no. I seriously doubt that the 3 will be shit. Most likely it is going to have the same interior that the Tesla model S currently has, while the model S will be upgrade to have the same interior as the X. And according to those that have moved from MB class S to a Tesla Model S and then to an X, they tell me that the X is by far the best.

      As to the 3, it will have similar interior to the current S.

      Finally, rich ppl are NOT buying the 3 as their primary car, but they likely are buying them for their kids.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    89. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Over 150K of the sales was done before the reveal. Musk even announced it. And infinity did not sell 150K of their first car in its first 6 months, let alone before its reveal.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    90. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      why burn it? It does great for making plastics, fertilizer, drugs, composites, etc. Basically, cheap CLEAN oil will help drive the global economy in less than 5 years.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    91. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by torkus · · Score: 1

      Because of the $billions invested in the fields and rigs and discovery. Capital investment on that scale doesn't allow you to close the plant down for a month or two because demand is low and remain in business.

      Google what one sea-going drilling platform costs.

      Storage facilities are being built, but they're also long-term capital assets with the larger ones being strategic reserves by country. It's actually frightening how little storage the oil industry has vs. consumption considering it touches virtually every industry. I forget the actual figures but there's something well under 6 months worth of oil in motion/storage globally.

      So no, we can't just leave it in the ground or throw it all into huge tanks.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    92. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Normally I don't buy new cars, but the biggest appeal to me here is being able to get an HOV plate since it is an alternative fuel vehicle. It's tempting to me because I don't know when Arizona will stop issuing these, and they likely will at some point. Once you have one though, you can keep it so long as you continue to own an alternative fuel vehicle.

    93. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      The biggest benefit is the HOV plate you can get in most states. How useful that is depends on what your commute is like. For me it's a pretty big deal.

    94. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      True, but good luck finding gas stations. When the price plummets, and buyers are demanding EVs, then the majority of gas stations will close quickly.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    95. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by torkus · · Score: 1

      No, they stayed open because the daily costs for capital loans, and overhead still exist while the daily *operation* cost is smaller.

      i.e. your mortgage is $1000/month (i wish!)
      Your utilities are $250/month so total monthly cost is $1250

      The neighborhood went to shit and you can't sell. You usually work from home and make $2k/month but got a pay cut to $1k.

      Now, you could quit your job, move out, and eat the $1k/month ... or you could stay and take a hit for $250/month until things get better which also protects your investment in your house.

      That's why these companies are producing oil for a loss - it's less of a loss than closing up shop and the long term prospectus is still hopeful.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    96. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's cool, but you can get a car that qualifies right now, this instant - no need to put up a deposit and wait 2 or 3 years.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    97. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually 150K is double what they are CURRENTLY selling JUST IN THE US.
      However, the difference is that Tesla has or is in the process of, scaling up all areas to support over .5M cars / year. For example, their painting bay support over .5M. Stamper is now rated for over .5M.
      So no, it should be pretty easy for them to scale up. The hard question is, can their suppliers scale up?

    98. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Based on the Model X as well as the massive changes that they made to the factory for it, I suspect that 3 will start in less than 1 year, and will scale up very quickly.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    99. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      When the price plummets, and buyers are demanding EVs

      If... you should replace the word "when" with the word "if"...

      There are so many people here stuck in the groupthink that it must be a given that EVs will become super cheap.

      Maybe they will, but there is no assurance of that.

      The majority of gas stations won't close until people stop buying gas. If EVs do become more common, then gas cars will become cheaper, at least on the used market, and gas will get cheaper still.

      There will be a market of people who drive them nearly forever on crazy cheap gas and the cars won't be worth selling.

    100. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't hold my breath for $50k to magically be removed from the sticker price with no impact on quality.

      Rich people aren't buying these for their kids - 2 or 3 years is an eternity for a kid. I mean, I'm sure that accounts for a few of the deposits, but the bulk are people who really, really, really want a Tesla but can't or won't spend $100k. It's a middle-class version of waiting in line for the new Air Jordans.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    101. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Kjella · · Score: 1

      A Leaf has an MSRP of $30k, but the highest price you'll fetch on the used market after driving it off the lot is around $20k. So yeah, you "saved" $7500 that the used market immediately accounted for.

      Well obviously, since today anybody can go buy a new car with their own tax incentive. But say three years from now the tax credit is ended, a potential buyer can either buy new at $30k with no credit or a three year old car for what, sub-$20k? Seems like a no-brainer. Incentives ending are good for the second hand value, all other things being equal.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    102. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Not that I don't believe you, but do you have a source? I found lots of conflicting information and came to the conclusion that it doesn't really matter - most people are just throwing money at them without actually reading any kind of agreement.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    103. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Does anyone ELSE have production plans, designs, or the capability of launching the 3 before Tesla?

      They don't call it the "3", but Chevy has an all-electric on the way and Nissan has been selling one for years. It's not insane to imagine them stepping up the game or changing the price to stay ahead of Tesla in the cheap electric category. I think the Tesla will be nicer, but again it is pure speculation. An electrified Prius could easily happen, and that would put Tesla's reputation for quality up against a seriously competent automaker with a long record (if recently a bit blemished) of building high-quality cars. A lot can happen in 2 years - more competition means more price pressure. Low gas prices mean more price pressure. This is not a done deal.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    104. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm going to make a leap here and assert that someone willing to spend $1000 just to jump the line and have the newest shiny is not going to hold on to a car for 10 years. That would be practical.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    105. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That is true, but the ones on the market right now are already known to suck to the point of being borderline useless. Take the Nissan Leaf for example; if you have the AC going and drive at a sane speed (even though 65 is the freeway speed limit, nobody ever goes that slow here in the HOV lane; usually 75ish) the battery probably won't last you an entire day. This description fits basically all of them. This is why the Tesla Model 3 is a big deal -- it has a practical range at a practical price.

      Anyways you don't need to convince me not to buy (not sure why you're doing this to begin with) because at the current time I don't intend on buying, I'm just saying it's tempting (especially since I have enough disposable income to pay it off in 8 months.)

    106. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I agree that, emotionally, it is tempting to buy. The nice thing about middle age is that part of the brain is less important than it used to be :)

      My motivations are not clear - I was just responding to a comment that I thought summed it up quite well: the reality distortion field is strong.

      For what it's worth, I want a Leaf-style car with a smaller battery (and correspondingly cheaper). It would be perfect for my 10 mile commute. When gas goes back up, maybe I'll pick a used one up - they are kind of crappy but at $11k very tempting for "free gas". But with gas at $2, that's 110,000 miles worth of gas in my minivan - closer to 150,000 miles in the Camry. No way to justify it to the lovely wife.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    107. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That is true, though I suspect that the battery cost decline which enabled the Model 3 in the first place will continue, which will further undermine the value as newer electric cars become cheaper and cheaper.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    108. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      The tax benefits would still apply, but I wouldn't be able to apply them to the Tesla in that case (you can't sell the car for at least 5 years after applying the tax rebate). And the range of the car is an issue. I regularly drive 50 km to get to my work, then drive to another customer 90 km the other way, then back to my home. That's not every week, but it happens at least once a month. I have customers that are 90 km. away that I sometimes have to get to for weeks or months on end. If my car can *just* make that, it will be problematic in winter or when I have to make a detour.

      Also, the Nissan Leaf is much more expensive over here. About twice your price. Which really makes it about the same price as a model 3. The secondhand cars I was able to find are around 15k euro, with 90.000km on the meter. Not that interesting. Our secondhand car market is quite different from that in the USA. Most secondhand cars that can drive, get exported to Eastern Europe right away to get a higher price there than they could locally. This drives up prices in the local market.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    109. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Based on the Model X as well as the massive changes that they made to the factory for it, I suspect that 3 will start in less than 1 year, and will scale up very quickly.

      It is currently April 2016. Musk himself said that it would be the end of 2017 before the Model 3 was sold.

      That is closer to 2 years than 1.

    110. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Gas cars will still be sold in the year 2100."

      Probably not, at least not in significant numbers. There is a generational shift going on that is helping the likes of Tesla, in that people in the 25-35 year old bracket are less hardened in their ways and potentially more interested in new ways, such as driving EVs. EV sales and their extant numbers will continue to grow. The only reason ICE cars are cheaper is because they don't pay for the pollution and carbon they dump into the atmosphere. For the first 150 years, that was acceptable because there weren't viable alternatives. But there are now, and in the case of EVs, they're actually better cars (faster, simpler, cheaper to maintain, etc.) Eventually, there will be enough people with EVs who will ask why ICE cars should continue to get a free pass on their emissions, and a carbon tax will be imposed. When that happens, ICE sales will drop quickly. I'd guess that's about 20 years out, maybe a bit less.

    111. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      No, he said that it would be in 2017 and COULD be at the end. He left it open as to when the line would start.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    112. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Even if you missed out on 7% pa (which I think is hopelessly optimistic in the day and age) that'd be $70. So what?

      Good job you're not in a hurry, because you'll be waiting for a long time before 2nd year models come on to the user car market. ANd if they are still supply constrained, the used models that do may even be more expensive, not 2/3rds the price.

    113. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You might be able to get last years iPhone for cheaper than you could have got it a year ago. But you'll also get one year less usage out of it, so it's not quite the deal you think it is.

    114. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're a dreamer. If there are any repossessed Model 3s on the market, there will be a lot of competition to buy them. There will be no steep discounts.

    115. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's a refundable deposit. It's not "spent" unless they go through with the purchase. And since it gives them access to a much bigger tax saving, it's actually saving them money over what you are going to end up spending if you ever buy a new Tesla.

    116. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      FlyHelicopters, always on the EV stories commenting about how they are not going to catch on. Even though the news stories show success.

      "No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame." over and over again.

      FlyHelicopters, always on the wrong side of history.

    117. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The GigaFactory is built and operational. Presumably in the process of scaling up production.

    118. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Even though the news stories show success.

      They do? I haven't seen any yet. At least no financial success and little sales success.

      The closest you could come to success would be the Toyota Prius... nothing else EV could be called a success...

      Not even the Model S, which has managed to lose billions of dollars.

      Now, it may yet make a profit in the long run, only time will tell on that one. If it does, then good for Tesla. But there seems to be an assumption that Tesla is somehow owed massive success and profits.

      1. Tesla has to deliver the Model 3, on time and on budget.

      2. Tesla has to actually turn a profit on those cars.

      3. Tesla has to be able to build enough of them, fast enough, to keep Ford/GM/etc. from running away with the market, assuming the above two become possible.

      The above is not impossible, but it isn't easy and a given either.

    119. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're anything but indifferent to Tesla and EVs. You're on every thread on the topic. You're desperate for them to fail. You're totally committed to gas powered vehicles.

    120. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest you could come to success would be the Toyota Prius... nothing else EV could be called a success...

      Why ever not?

      Not even the Model S, which has managed to lose billions of dollars.

      Nope. Building the Model S has cost billions, but building does cost money. That's not losing money. That's spending money.

      In terms of success, it has certainly delivered a quality product, so all it has to do is keep being quality.

      Much like Tucker's critics who portrayed his car as a failure, you just lack the honesty and integrity, and it shows.

    121. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Not even the Model S, which has managed to lose billions of dollars.

      You're a fucking imbecile. R&D and setting up factories is paid for over the full production years of a product. The Model S (and the Model X which is based on the same chassis) will be in production for years yet.

      Now, it may yet make a profit in the long run, only time will tell on that one.

      So why say it's lost billions, idiot.

    122. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      My reply to that would be that you're a fanboy who is blind to reality and money, believing that they have a destiny to never fail.

      The difference is, I'm perfectly happy for Tesla to succeed, I just think it will be much harder than you do.

      I also don't think the market for EVs is nearly as large as you do, there are many issues to widespead adoption, most of which you sweep under the rug quite easily.

    123. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You're a fucking imbecile.

      The irony there is thick... since you're the one who doesn't know what you're talking about.

      R&D and setting up factories is paid for over the full production years of a product.

      They are capital investments, not expenses.

      Your problem is that you don't know how financials work. Cash-flow and P&I are two very different things.

      Tesla is bleeding both cash and income.

      People like you, who don't actually know how money works, think that because Tesla is building a huge battery factory, that it explains why they are losing money. It doesn't.

      It explains why they are losing CASH. But income and cash are not the same thing. Tesla doesn't use the cash system of accounting, they use the accrual method, which means that just because they spend a billion dollars doesn't mean they get to reduce their profit by a billion dollars this year. They may have to take 20 years to do it, so they get to write off $50 million a year.

      Tesla is bleeding cash because it is building factories, but it is also bleeding income (or the lack of it) because it isn't making anything building cars either.

      If Tesla built 100,000 Model S cars tomorrow, they would report a larger loss, not a smaller one. The loss is on the cars themselves, not on factories.

      Each Tesla Model S costs about $15,000 more to build than they sell it for. They are accepting this right now for image and marketshare, hoping to get those costs down over time. However it is also possible that it will never make a dime, which is fine, but it does lead into the Model 3, which they will have to make a profit building.

      Going from a $85k cost to build base Model S to a $35k selling price on the Model 3 is a massive jump. Can they do it? Maybe, but everything has to work right and some luck on top of it.

    124. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Actually I was going to say a hot poker, but you're were very close.

    125. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      People like you, who don't actually know how money works, think that because Tesla is building a huge battery factory, that it explains why they are losing money. It doesn't.

      Wrong. I told YOU that that didn't mean they were losing money. That you think they are losing money in the cars themselves is why YOU are an imbecile.

    126. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're clearly not happy for Tesla to succeed, or you would repetitively talk shit like this.

      If you don't think the market for EVs is large, you are wrong. Gas in unsustainable. EVs will replace them. EVs are following the standard technology adoption curve. 25 years from now there will be as many gas powered cars as there are typewriters or monochrome TVs.

    127. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Great minds... :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    128. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The tax savings is probably false, unless you neglect the impact to the resale value. The tax credit comes pretty much right off the top at resale time. So if you were planning on running your Tesla into the ground, then yes you could realize a tax savings. Otherwise you are simply deferring the cost until trade-in.

      To be fair, Tesla has nearly used up their tax credits, so it is conceivable that a few of these people will luck out and get a Tesla for the $7500 discount. At this point they could theoretically hold on to the car for a year or so as the tax credits taper off, and then resell with no impact to the used car price. I would suggest, however, that one force works against this: the continuous improvement in battery technology. The same cost reduction that allowed the Tesla 3 in the first place will continue. This will make either the batteries cheaper or the range longer in newer cars. A used car with $12,000 batteries will be worth no more than the same performing car with $10,000 batteries 3 years later. The used market does not care what the original purchase price of the car is.

      Anyway, in general it is foolish to approach a car as an asset. It is a liability, and the rational economic thing to do is minimize your expenditures. I will admit that is not much fun :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    129. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, the nice thing about prognosticating about how other people will get screwed out of their $1000 is that a mistake costs me nothing :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    130. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That assumes that I don't have access to other phones, or that the money spent in another way won't make me happier.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    131. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Wow, I post all that and still you don't get it.

      Or don't care, but that's ok, the majority of the people in the world either don't care or don't want to care.

      That you think they are losing money in the cars themselves is why YOU are an imbecile.

      I don't think it, I know it, I've read the financial statements Tesla has released. As publicly traded company, this information is not secret.

    132. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Gas in unsustainable.

      No doubt, I don't think anyone disagrees with that statement.

      But it will last longer than our lifetimes.

      If you don't think the market for EVs is large, you are wrong.

      Citation needed. You stating it doesn't make it so.

      Maybe it is, but there are lots of EVs for sale today and they just aren't selling in anything other than token numbers to the fringe enthusiasts.

      Maybe the Model 3 will be the one that breaks out, maybe not. But it hasn't yet and all the evidence that exists today says that normal people, the masses, just don't care about EVs.

      25 years from now there will be as many gas powered cars as there are typewriters or monochrome TVs.

      Last year 75 million cars and light trucks were built. There are over 1 billion cars in the world, 99.9% of them gas powered.

      Even if all car production instantly changed to EV production, it would take over 13 years to replace them all with EVs.

      Except that isn't going to happen. Last year, 540,000 plug in EVs were made, the majority of which were actually plugin hybrids (like the Prius).

      Even if EV production hits 20% of cars in the next 10 years, there is no chance that in 25 years gas cars will be all gone.

      ---

      You may well reject the above because it doesn't fit your world view, but I'm stating facts and you're stating wishes and dreams.

      Facts tend to win in the end.

    133. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're making that claim. You're not alone.

      But...others see it different.

      http://www.autoblog.com/2015/08/10/tesla-does-not-lose-4000-each-model-s/

      http://bgr.com/2015/08/11/tesla-model-s-profits-4000/

      I'm sorry, FlyHelicopters, but you're in the position of having to show your own work, not handwave it under "the information is not secret, I know it, I've read the financial statements" since well, it turns out, your claim is disputable.

      Accounting, it's part of statistics, one of the three ways to lie.

    134. Re: Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is how the MS and MX were done.

    135. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The ACs articles are telling you exactly what I told you. You are naively dividing the money they've spent so far and dividing it by the cars they've sold so far. It;s not just capital costs you're not allowing for but all up front costs.

    136. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That's the same as what it costs them.

    137. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by lgw · · Score: 1

      Nice! Really hoping the Model 3 works out well - just because everything Tesla is overhyped doesn't prevent it from actually being good.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    138. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And yet you are trying to tell other people that their spending is foolish, when you have no idea what they have now, what makes them happy. Nor what their finances are.

    139. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There is no way to defend the fronting of $1000 for a yet-to-exist car on economic terms. I'm sorry if that in some way offends you. I understand the emotional component, but also am not afraid to point out to people that they are basically doing the same thing as the lunks that stand around at Apple stores, or who wait in line for a pair of Air Jordans. It's your money, do with it what you will.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    140. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That seems untrue on the face of it. They pay $1000 for the thrill of being first around town.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    141. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you understand the concept of a returnable deposit.

    142. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      "Defend". Dude people don't have to defend different choices on how they use their money. Returnable deposits are a reasonably common transaction that like any other transaction brings a benefit to each side. There's nothing in economics that rules them out as reasonable.

      The emotion seems to be yours. Stereotyping people who buy Teslas with people who buy Apples and Air Jordans.

      Your fundamental problem is that $1000 is a significantly difficult amount of money for you. For others it's not. Saving a few dollars here and there is more important to you than quality of product and getting new products early. For some other's its not. Each to their own.

    143. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Your fundamental problem is that $1000 is a significantly difficult amount of money for you.

      No, my problem is that I'm too old to care what people think when they see me driving a car. I'm also too old to fall for psychological marketing tricks like making people feel like they'll miss out because of an artificial sense of scarcity. Waiting 6 months to a year is not a big deal anymore.

      What is this "stereotyping" crap? I'm judging people based on their actions - that's the opposite of a stereotype. You are the one pulling the stereotyping garbage with the assumption that I can't afford $1000. When you only buy a car every 10 years or so it is easy to save up to pay cash for them.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    144. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, those people have -$1000 right now and no car in return.

      I think you have a funny definition of "cost".

      They do have a nice, shiny IOU. I'm very jealous.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    145. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The fact that you have to save up to buy a car confirms that $1000 is a significantly amount of money for you. People who don't have to think about $1000, just buy a car.

      And buying a Tesla isn't about what people think of you any more than buying an iPhone is. Big mistake. It's the pleasure of using something of quality. Apple has the highest customer satisfaction in the industry. Everyone who drives a Tesla loves the experience (not the turning heads).

    146. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The fact that you have to save up to buy a car confirms that $1000 is a significantly amount of money for you. People who don't have to think about $1000, just buy a car.

      Everyone has to either (a) save for a car or (b) finance one. The only other options are edge cases like gifts or raffles. Before you get into a semantic game with me, I realize that you can already have a pile of money sitting around. That's what I'm calling savings.

      Apple has the highest customer satisfaction in the industry.

      I quite like Apple's products, and I quite like Tesla's. At the Apple Store, some of the line people seem to have fun with it - good for them. Personally, the unhappiness that I would experience would far outweigh the happiness brought by a slight jump on the rest of the earth in possessing the newest iThing first. But there is no line for the Tesla - just the loss of use of $1000. No one is masochistic enough to like that.

      Everyone who drives a Tesla loves the experience (not the turning heads).

      If that's the case, and if money is no object, then why aren't these depositors simply buying a Model S? You can get it right now, get your tax credit, and bask in Tesla goodness immediately. No, these people either cannot afford or are unwilling to spend the money on a Model S.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    147. Re:Apple sold 13 million iPhone 6s/6s+ in 3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say they've delivered on all the hype. Biggest problem is their timing, but they're working on that.

  2. Hard to compare by Dorianny · · Score: 2

    Have any other manufacturers done a $1000 deposit, cancel at any time for a full refund pre-launch before? It is hard to know how many paid the fully refundable deposit just so they can have reserve a spot in the line if they decide to get one or even trying just in case they might profit from selling the spot.

    1. Re:Hard to compare by rahvin112 · · Score: 0

      So you think average people would give Tesla $1000 to hold for a MIN of 18 months on an off chance they would buy it? You're either ridiculously wealthy with no concept of money or an idiot. I'm thinking the former.

    2. Re:Hard to compare by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      If they put it on their mortgage at 3%, it would end up costing them $45 in interest over the 18 months.
      Oh no, $45!

    3. Re:Hard to compare by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      If having $1000 to put towards something, anything, is what you consider ridiculously wealthy you might want to seek out a better job.

      The fact you can't come up with that money doesn't mean others haven't managed their money as poorly as you have.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:Hard to compare by Kjella · · Score: 2

      So you think average people would give Tesla $1000 to hold for a MIN of 18 months on an off chance they would buy it? You're either ridiculously wealthy with no concept of money or an idiot. I'm thinking the former.

      So I just checked my bank here in Norway, 0.75% per year interest on savings over 100 kNOK = $12k. So 1.5*$7.50 = $11.25, except I'll also pay 28% interest tax so $8.10 net, man I'm dying here. Sure I could possibly/probably do better in stocks or property, but risk-free interest doesn't even cover a fraction of inflation anymore. The ECB in the EU is the same, the US Fed rate is also scraping the barrel... I'd lose almost the same amount just putting it in the mattress, except it's probably safer at Tesla and keeping my seat warm. And I know I will need a new car around that time frame, one way or the other. I'd be more bummed if it reviews great because then the delivery time would almost certainly be so long I'd have to go for something else instead.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Hard to compare by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      You are joking, right? I may be an idiot (I have 7 kids and while my wife works harder than I do she doesn't get paid for it), but I'm no where near ridiculously wealthy and I could swing $1000 for a down payment easily. Maybe you need a better paying job or you stink at managing your finances.

    6. Re:Hard to compare by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      So you can swing the $1000 (as could I) and you would put that money down for a place in line with only mild desire to buy one? Because THAT was the premise of the post I replied to. I'm not going to give anyone $1000 for 18months unless I really want it, neither would you and neither would the vast vast majority of people putting those deposits down.

      That was my point, $1000 is a lot of money for most people and they aren't going to throw it down on a mild interest in purchasing something in 2 years.

    7. Re:Hard to compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might be? No, there's no question. Anyone with 7 kids is DEFINITELY an idiot.

    8. Re:Hard to compare by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I'm no rocket scientist but I think that's $2.50 per month!

    9. Re: Hard to compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking racist. Most black men have 8 to 14.

    10. Re:Hard to compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we learned with video games, preorders are just stupid.

    11. Re: Hard to compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also culturally appropriated all his kids, even more racist!

    12. Re:Hard to compare by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I'd be more bummed if it reviews great

      Yeah, it'd be great if it sucked...

    13. Re:Hard to compare by torkus · · Score: 1

      I spent 10 grand on implants for my girlfriend. Can we discuss the interest there?

      $1k is nothing for a "normal" adult in a 1st world country. Heck, even teens spend that on purses and shoes.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  3. I ordered mine :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I ordered mine. Of course I'm not expecting to get it for 2-3 years.

  4. Elon has the biggest one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes we know that already. Your rocket blasts off earlier than the guy's from amazon, and it can be reused.

  5. And this despite lower gasoline prices by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    My one question is durability?

    I mean, 8 years and your battery is almost a brick right?

    A gas car you can keep going for 15 to 20 years.

    OTH, maybe battery prices will drop by 90% over the next 8 years. In which case, no problem.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I mean, 8 years and your battery is almost a brick right?

      No. It will have reduced capacity, but it will still be functional. The quoted estimate is around a 30% reduction in capacity after 8 years.

      If the reduced capacity is great enough to be covered by the warranty, then Tesla will replace the battery for you. If not, you will have the option of either using the battery as-is, or purchasing a better replacement yourself (which will probably be expensive, but less expensive in 8 years than it is now since battery prices keep decreasing).

      A gas car you can keep going for 15 to 20 years.

      Modulo maintenance, gas, and the various parts you will have to repair or replace, or course.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My one question is durability?

      I mean, 8 years and your battery is almost a brick right?

      A gas car you can keep going for 15 to 20 years.

      OTH, maybe battery prices will drop by 90% over the next 8 years. In which case, no problem.

      Where the fuck do you get your numbers???

      The Model S batteries are holding out well -should be at 90% capacity after 20 years of use.

      oh wait. You are just trolling because you can. And I bit.

    3. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by aliquis · · Score: 1

      A gas car you can keep going for 15 to 20 years.

      Unless it's banned before then / Swede.

    4. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by sldunn · · Score: 5, Informative
      Turns out Lithium Ion batteries, if you keep them the right temperature, last a very long time.

      At a high level, the battery is damaged just a little bit each time it's charged. The amount of damage caused during charging is based on the temperature and how full the battery is. This means the longevity of a lithium ion battery is basically a function of how many times they are charged, the temperature, and if you charge it to 100% or only to 70%.

      In the real world, with the Model S, people are reporting under a 20% degradation after 100k miles. It should last somewhere between 300k-500k before it's half dead.

      As I understand it, as the battery capacity decreased, there should be a plan would be to install a new fresh battery pack, with the old one reused in a role for stationary storage, before finally being recycled.

    5. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Alomex · · Score: 1

      A gas car you can keep going for 15 to 20 years.

      ..and a lottery ticket might be worth a million dollars.

      Back here in planet Earth the average car life expectancy in the US is 12 years and outside the dry snowless southern states very few cars last past 15 years.

    6. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I mean, 8 years and your battery is almost a brick right?

      Is that an assertion of fact, or a question? It looks like a question, with that question mark there and everything, but then you keep going as if it's a fact.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    7. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      You're just thinking of people who drive 10,000+ miles a year -- those of us who do less driving naturally have cars that last a lot longer. My current car is 18, my previous car was 17 when it died, both below 100K miles.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    8. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by AlanBDee · · Score: 5, Informative

      I keep fairly detailed records of the maintenance cost of my cars. My 2000 Toyota 4Runner, purchased in 2003, has cost me $13,479 in maintenance. I've put 140,000 miles on it. My 2007 Honda Accord has cost me $5174 with 95,000 miles put on it. This is excluding the purchase price and gas.

      Purchase plus maintenance plus gas on the Accord comes out to about $0.37/mile. The 4Runner is $0.43/mile.

      In theory the EV won't require nearly as much in maintenance cost and would save in gas so even if I had to buy a new battery for $8,000 every 8 years it would probably make sense.

    9. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      A gas car you can keep going for 15 to 20 years.

      Modulo maintenance, gas, and the various parts you will have to repair or replace, or course.

      And the Tesla's only maintenance item is tires.

    10. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to it the fact that the old battery can be sold for local power storage or worst case recycled. It will pay back quite a bit of that $8K.

    11. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by afidel · · Score: 2

      Holy hell, how are you spending so much on maintenance? I buy used cars with ~65k miles on them (best tradeoff between depreciation and reliability IME) and run then to 150-200k and they only cost me a few thousand dollars in maintenance, the second time a car costs me over $500 I seriously consider if it's time to scrap it and get a 'new' one.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by afidel · · Score: 2

      And replacement motors, batteries, coolant pumps, radiators, wheel bearing, suspension, differential, battery control electronics, charging electronics, HVAC system, seat heaters, dash computer, dash display. Yup, there's nothing that will ever need maintenance in a Tesla...

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by afidel · · Score: 1

      No, the average AGE of car on the road today in the US is 11.5 years, the average age at destruction is 18 years which means the vast majority will make 15+ years.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by kuzb · · Score: 1

      No, you won't be selling it for any appreciable amount. What will actually happen is they'll give you a small fraction of what the battery is worth - maybe 5-10% to recycle it if they give you anything at all. People won't have the means to dispose of these things on their own, so they will be at a disadvantage. We see the same thing with every form of recycling - someone is benefiting from getting all the raw materials but the consumer is never really rewarded for it. In the most likely case you will be required to put down a deposit on a battery that you'd get back after you returned it.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    15. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Probably because he's doing preventative maintenance by replacing key components before they fail instead of after/during - something most people don't do. This is the smart move if you want your vehicle to retain as much of its value as possible.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    16. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by afidel · · Score: 2

      He's spent more on maintenance for his 4runner that I spent for purchase + maintenance of my current vehicle, hardly seems like a smart move to me. In fact I just checked Fulio and my cost per mile excluding purchase but including insurance, gas, and maintenance has been $.17 over the last 30 months. If I get only 90,000 miles out of my car the full cost per mile will be ~$.26 which is about 50% below his figures. It's not like I'm giving up reliability either, my car has probably spent less time in the shop than his has if he's spent that much on maintenance.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I can't believe how naive people are being. Batteries are expensive. Tesla is a megamillion-dollar corporation. They're a car company, for Pete's sake. They'll find a way to weasel out of the warranty, you can count on it. The founder won't live forever.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    18. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Alomex · · Score: 2

      In other words, I'm thinking about the average driver which according to statistics drives 15K miles a year. Additionally in Northern climes the limiting factor is often the number of winters, not the total number of miles.

    19. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      No, you won't be selling it for any appreciable amount. What will actually happen is they'll give you a small fraction of what the battery is worth - maybe 5-10% to recycle it if they give you anything at all.

      If the battery is completely non-functional, that's true, but in many (most?) cases, the battery still works fine, it's just no longer storing enough charge to be worth carrying around in a car. In that case, the battery still has value as a fixed-installation energy storage device and can be sold at a higher price (dunno how much higher yet) to those who are setting up battery backup /energy storage systems for solar arrays, utility-scale energy storage, etc.

      I expect that by the time your model 3's battery is worn out, there will be a significant non-automotive market for "used" car batteries.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    20. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Used batteries are being targeted for use in powerwalls, where a 30% reduction in capacity is meaningless to the application.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    21. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's kept it immaculate, in which case, the question becomes why. But actually, I find the amount somewhat shocking as well. That's a lot for a Toy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      A) Many people DO keep gasoline cars going for 15 to 20 years.

      therefore

      B) a gas car CAN (it is POSSIBLE) keep going for 15 to 20 years.

      Lots of people
      a) Get into accidents (Huge affect on "average" car life expectancy).
      b) Don't do proper maintenance
      c) Drive the car to death
      d) Choose not to repair it when a $2,000 repair could keep the car going another 100,000 miles.

      so applying these factors to the tesla
      a) Get into accidents (Huge affect on "average" car life expectancy). (Yup)
      b) Don't do proper maintenance (Don't know)
      c) Drive the car to death (Yup!)
      d) Choose not to repair it when a $2,000 repair could keep the car going another 100,000 miles. (Probably).

      So lighten up man. You intentionally misrepresented my post to make a weak point based on a lot of factors we have no clue about yet.
       

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    23. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the range of an 8 year battery is degraded enough that most people won't be able to use the car except for short in town commutes. To that point, I've seen estimates of as little as 50% capacity at the 8 year mark on Tesla discussion boards.

      But, I put the question mark there so people who had better facts (not just opinions) could respond with facts and give me correct or updated information.

      The best way to get information on the internet is not to ask a question (you just get crickets). It is to make a statement. Then people will move heaven and earth and spend lots of time researching to contradict what you said.

      I would love to own an electric car. But I know how fast batteries go bad on all my other devices so this is a big concern on such a big ticket item.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    24. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      90% is crazy talk. No battery lasts 20 years with 90% capacity.

      I think the other person responding with 20% after 100k miles is more reasonable. But even that is high compared to figures I've seen discussed on some Tesla boards and may be a 'best case'.

      This site shows 80% capacity after three years (900 days) with MANY data points near 60% capacity.
      http://www.hybridcars.com/stud...

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    25. Re: And this despite lower gasoline prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. That's just the only one you are aware of

    26. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Well I saw lower figures but also found this while discussing this post.

      http://www.hybridcars.com/stud...

      Summary is 20% loss after a little less than 3 years (like losing 5mpg to 10mpg in a gasoline car).
      Also, a substantial group losing 30% in 800 days.
      And with a dozen losing 40% in only 800 days.

      And this is a pro electric car site using actual data.

      I'm skeptical. My battery powered electric devices have shorter lifespans.

      If it's as good as they say, I'd want an extended warranty from the manufacturer backing up the promise with a replacement battery.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    27. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      And the Tesla's only maintenance item is tires.

      I think this sentence best describes the "informed Tesla-buyer" demographic. They're clueless, and they don't know it.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    28. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      30% after 8 years seems rather pessimistic. Tesla tested a Model S 85kW pack up to 750,000 miles with 16% capacity loss. That's in line with what the battery manufacturer (Panasonic) rates the cells at. 3000 cycles to 80% remaining capacity. 300 miles range per cycle, for a total of 900,000 miles to 20% loss.

      That's with constant supercharging too. Supercharging isn't actually that hard on the cells, as they are actively cooled and 120kW is only about 1.4C, not particularly high for lithium.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Good luck driving a 20 year old Diesel into any city in Germany, Sweden, or Holland. You can easily buy a Tesla from the fines alone.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    30. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by AaronW · · Score: 2

      I haven't noticed much loss in my Model S after over 3 years and almost 40K miles. My previous car, a Prius, had no loss in mileage after 100K miles. The losses in the other cars are going to be much higher because of the much smaller batteries. The loss of capacity is due to cycling of the battery. For my P85, 1000 cycles on the battery is around 200K miles. The batteries should be good for longer than that. These are automotive grade batteries, not the crappy ones they put in most consumer devices.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    31. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by AaronW · · Score: 1

      3000 cycles on my P85 works out in excess of 600K miles.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    32. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by AaronW · · Score: 1

      The loss should be much less at 100K miles. I have 40K miles on my model S and haven't noticed any drop in range. Panasonic says that the batteries will be at 80% capacity after 3000 cycles. 3000 cycles on my P85 is in excess of 600K miles. 100K miles is less than 500 cycles.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    33. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by AaronW · · Score: 2

      You heard wrong. I've had my model S for over 3 years and have about 40K miles on it. I have not seen any noticeable degradation in range. The Panasonic cells are rated to have 80% of their capacity after 3000 cycles. 3000 cycles is at least 600K miles with my 85KWH battery pack. The new cars have an even bigger pack (90KW) except for the lower end ones (70KWH). If I consider 200 miles of range per cycle it works out to 600K miles. I easily exceed the 200 mile range on a charge.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    34. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Do you not charge it if it's at 75% when you get home then? how about 50%?

      Not trying to be argumentative, I'm legit curious as to how these are being used by their drivers, I suspect I'd charge every night.

      I suppose also their could be internal load balancing on the cells so that when you top off, those cells go last in line to get used again?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    35. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Good luck driving a 20 year old Diesel into any city in Germany, Sweden, or Holland. You can easily buy a Tesla from the fines alone.

      The progress-backwards anti-white I'm-not-a-communist-fascist-socialist-but-yes-I-am everyone-is-equal-fuck-men-applaud-all-black would want it banned by then completely.

      I'm totally fine for using electric cars but it would be nice if someone with an old one could actually drive it.

      As for the pollution at-least it would be much less then than now. Also if they hadn't been so much against nuclear power from the beginning ..

    36. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      A gas car you can keep going for 15 to 20 years.

      Let me bring you up to the present. Those cars largely got taken off the road with Cash for Clunkers. Today's cars are designed to be "recyclable" (made with the cheapest, lightest materials), not repairable. They also have more moving parts than ever (variable valve-timing, etc) and are beginning to require ultra-expensive (i.e. dealership-only) diagnostic equipment for servicing (the data pathways are DMCA-protected so mom & pop repair shops will be increasingly unable to interface their diagnostic equipment with your car)...

      Here's a story for you: Audi (just to name one) doesn't recommend performing a transmission fluid flush. Ever. Why? They claim that the synthetic factory fluid is "good for the life of the vehicle." Alright, that's fine... but what's the life of the vehicle? Well, according to Audi, it's a mere 80,000 miles.

      Now contrast this automotive-industry bullshit with Musk's stated intention, which is to make sure every Tesla's powertrain is good for at least 8 years and a million miles...

    37. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what is your vehicle? this is not a relevant comparison until you actual give data points to compare. Is your car smaller, used, eco friendly, newer, older, where are these cars located?

      larger vehicles that may be used for things other than commuting tend to require more maintenance in general. for example if he was using his 4 runner to tow things, or maybe go off road. Maintenance costs are primarily based off of usage not the type of vehicle, electrics just cost less because of the complete reduction of moving parts and the simplification of the systems once those parts are removed. a good secondary factor in maintenance is the location, if you live somewhere that sees all 4 seasons or in general colder climates, you will have much higher maintenance costs.

      but please continue to tell us how your un-named car is more reliable than his given that no one knows anything of the actual usage of any of those vehicles.

      ps on average, i buy cars for less than 5000 dollars and spend less than 2000 on maintenance to get 160,000 kms and so you know, i buy small cars with maintenance records and spend most of my time highway driving. Some people are more car savy than others, but it is no reason to judge a guy because of his maintenance costs

    38. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, the MS that have hit 150K, are showing that they have in the high 80s.
      BUT, you are 100% correct about the rest. It really is a matter of how often you charge and how controlled the temp is. Thankfully, Tesla has small cells and keeps them in decent HVAC system.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    39. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the range of an 8 year battery is degraded enough that most people won't be able to use the car except for short in town commutes. To that point, I've seen estimates of as little as 50% capacity at the 8 year mark on Tesla discussion boards.

      8 years ago the very first Tesla Roadster was coming out, so any 8 year old Tesla battery is the very earliest generation. The Model S, for example, is only 4 years old and uses better batteries than the Roadster. Even the later Model S battery packs are better technology than the earlier Model S packs. It's fair to say that the Model 3 batteries will be better technology than the Roadster batteries from 2008.

      This is from the page on the Model S:

      The battery is guaranteed for eight years or 125,000 miles (200,000 km in metric countries) for the base model with the 60 kWh battery pack. The 85 kWh battery pack is guaranteed for eight years and unlimited miles. A poll among drivers indicate that accumulated battery loss steadies around 5% after 30,000 miles (50,000 km), decreasing further about 1% per additional 30,000 miles.

      So, "almost a brick" wouldn't be a correct assessment.

      The best way to get information on the internet is not to ask a question (you just get crickets). It is to make a statement. Then people will move heaven and earth and spend lots of time researching to contradict what you said.

      I suppose. I just spent 2 minutes looking at Wikipedia to find out those dates and other info, which would have been easy enough to do for yourself, but whatever.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    40. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I agree on your first two points.

      As for nuclear power: the first generations weren't all that great. Modern, fourth generation reactors though... I'm all in favor. MUCH better than coal fired plants.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    41. Re:And this despite lower gasoline prices by aliquis · · Score: 1

      In this nation the electricity has been ~50% nuclear + 50% hydro-power more or less as long as that has been possible.

      Now there's some wind, biomass, solar, fossil and garbage thrown into that mix but I guess around 90% are still that way.

      It could had been better though. It could had been even more nuclear power (it has been but more still) and less of some of the others and possibly hydro-power too (ups and downs with that one.)

  6. Fully Refundable Deposit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow, Tesla is being discussed quite a bit for this stunt! But, most of these preorders will not materialize, I think.

    Check out the details at tesla.com (emphasis mine):

    If you proceed with the order, we will apply your Reservation Payment towards the order payment. Until you enter into a Purchase Agreement, your Reservation may be cancelled at any time, in which case you will receive a full refund of your Reservation Payment.

  7. Re:uhhh no, CoD? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    uhhh, yes?
    $14b is greater than $1b

  8. Just as meaningless as "Box office records"... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

    Doesn't mean anything at all unless you account for inflation.

  9. Good for him by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    If I had a better job I'd have lined up too. One of the few (only??) benefits of living in Quebec is the hydro power. But I remain carless for now, Montreal is not a very large city and I can still bike around at my august age.

    But from all comments, the Teslas seem like quality cars, good for Musk! Shake up the establishment!

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:Good for him by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Montreal is not a very large city? Really?. And it also has the largest underground city in the world ... just saying.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Good for him by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      That means half the city is underground, and therefore not accessible by bike. Yes. And yes, I live here, thank you, I can walk across the breadth of downtown in 15 minutes. I can also walk to the top of the hill known as Mont Royal. It's not very high...
      The rest of the island is just suburb after suburb, easily biked as well.
      So, you live in Montreal too?

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    3. Re:Good for him by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Thee's a big difference between downtown Montreal and the Montreal Metropolitan Area. Last I looked, most of them are not called suburbs any more - they've been merged into Montreal as boroughs. Lucky me, I live in DDO, which regained its independence via referendum.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  10. Lots of reasons to put deposit down by misnohmer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are a lot of reasons to put the deposit down:
    1. Low risk - fully refundable until actually placing configured order. The only risk is Tesla going under.
    2. Early Model 3 car still qualify for up to $7,500 US government tax credit. After Tesla has produced 200K cars for US market (including all Model S and X) the rebate drops off fast.
    3. With this strong demand, those who put the deposit down will get their cars up to 2 years earlier. First releases of a new model car tend to hold higher residuals as there are no older alternatives.
    4. Some may hope to speculate, buy an early car and sell it for profit to those who will pay an extra couple of thousand for not waiting 2 years for the new, trendy car. Once the $7.5K rebate drops off, that's an extra $7.5K value for the person who did get it and is reselling the car to those who can no longer get it.

    So, rather that collect 0.25% in a savings account, place a $1000 deposit, with low risk, but lots of potential upside. Why do people think that's crazy?

    1. Re:Lots of reasons to put deposit down by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      So, rather that collect 0.25% in a savings account, place a $1000 deposit, with low risk, but lots of potential upside. Why do people think that's crazy?

      It isn't, you are likely correct.

      That, and I don't expect more than half of the deposits to turn into orders.

      There is a decent chance the $35K price doesn't hold either, or it will be really bare bones and the ASP (average selling price) will be closer to $45K.

    2. Re:Lots of reasons to put deposit down by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I thought about putting a deposit down, but the long wait for UK residents put me off. We aren't likely to see cars before 2019, and by the time the queue starts to clear 2020.

      I really hope that the Model 3 spurs other manufacturers to take their EVs further.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Lots of reasons to put deposit down by olau · · Score: 1

      That, and I don't expect more than half of the deposits to turn into orders.

      Don't be too sure. There are a lot of people out there who want a cheaper version of Model S.

    4. Re:Lots of reasons to put deposit down by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Don't be too sure. There are a lot of people out there who want a cheaper version of Model S.

      Then why don't they buy one? They already exist, yet aren't selling all that many.

      Everything from the Leaf to the Volt to the Fusion Energi are options, yet their sales are less than impressive.

      How about the BMW i3 or Merc B-Class?

      http://www.plugincars.com/cars

      It seems like a lot of people think Tesla is the only company doing this, but Tesla plans to sell more Model 3s than almost that entire list combined.

      In 2015, 540,000 plug in EVs (including hybrids) were sold in the whole world. Among ALL those vehicles.

      Tesla wants to double that number with just one model.

      Is it possible? Sure. Is it likely? It sure seems like a very steep curve. But anything is possible.

    5. Re:Lots of reasons to put deposit down by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which specs I missed, but range alone puts Tesla way outside the competitions league.

      I don't want an Isetta like car that goes 50 miles on one charge! I CAN work around lower range and I can work around diminished refueling availability but not when range drops below 200!

      That being said, from what I've seen of Model 3's non-existent dashboard, I'll pass. Perhaps used Model S will someday become affordable.

    6. Re:Lots of reasons to put deposit down by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which specs I missed, but range alone puts Tesla way outside the competitions league.

      I'm not convinced range is the problem, rather recharge time is.

      You can make the range 50, 100, 200, or 500 miles, the primary concern people have, in my opinion, is how long does it take to fill up.

      The fear, or "range anxiety", is not solved by giving it 200 miles of range, because people worry "I'll forget to plug it in", or "I want to take a road trip", or "I want to move to another city, how do I get there?"

      Are there solutions to that? Sure, people suggest "get a rental car for road trips", or "ship the car and fly there", or "your phone will remind you to plug it in". But you know what the EASIEST solution is? Buy a gas powered car.

      Let me put this another way. The early adopters who have bought EVs so far have less trouble with this because they tend to be fanatical about the technology. But tens of millions of Soccer Moms and Dads don't care nearly as much and won't pay as close attention. The first time they have to take the kids somewhere and the car has no power, that'll be the end of that.

      A 15 min recharge time to at least 70% capacity is the solution, not more range. Even 15 min is long, I'm trying to be nice about that. 5 min would be better.

  11. Vaporware car by tomhath · · Score: 0

    I don't see how they can call it a "launch". More like announcement that they're selling vapor.

    1. Re:Vaporware car by linuxguy · · Score: 1

      Tesla showed the car and public took rides in it. That is hardly vapor. Production is at least 18 months away. Everybody understood that. Tesla has a reputation of producing quality cars. More so than many other car manufacturers. It appears that a lot of people believe that this will be case for some time to come.

    2. Re:Vaporware car by Burdell · · Score: 1

      Except they don't have a reputation of producing quality cars. After Consumer Reports gave such a glowing review, they pulled their recommendation. Surveys of owners of cars that had been on the road a bit caused CR to give it a "worse than average" reliability rating. Some of the issues were specific to Teslas (charging system failures, drivetrain problems) as well as normal issues (rattles, squeaks, leaks, door handles).

      A company trying to rapidly ramp up production is bound to have more issues than before, at least for a while; if they can't get door handles working and sunroofs sealed now, what will happen when they're trying to satisfy an impatient public?

    3. Re: Vaporware car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You reek of jealously.

    4. Re:Vaporware car by Khyber · · Score: 1

      CR is shit and has been for about 5 years.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Vaporware car by tomhath · · Score: 1

      In Detroit that would be called a "Concept Car". A hand built prototype that's years away from production. It is not a product roll-out.

  12. Let's do the math by wwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So much for the $35,000 price tag. $14B / 325,000 = $43,000. Even if we assume that half the sales will be for the basic configuration at the bottom price, then the other half would have to sell for $51,000 to make the average price they are projecting. Sounds to me like the $35K version will be completely bare-bones, and you'll have to pay a *lot* for things that come standard in other cars (the Porsche way). Personally, I was excited to get a nicely equipped electric car for $35K. $51K? Not so much.

    1. Re:Let's do the math by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      It's a Tesla not a BMW. Musk has gone on record as stating that even the base model will be quite generously equipped. This includes the autopilot hardware with safety features turned on (find that in any other car of that segment), supercharger capable, 215+mi range, 6s 0-60MPH. Interior features are yet to be revealed so we'll have to wait for specifics. At this point however, I see no reason not to take Musk at his word. The $14B is probably based upon his belief that the average buyer of the car will add upgrades bringing it to around $42,500.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    2. Re:Let's do the math by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Enthusiastic early pre-order fans who stand in line are unlikely to be bargain shoppers and more likely to go for premium options.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Let's do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah nice math fail, there is an $8K subsidy from the government. The price is after the subsidy.

    4. Re:Let's do the math by ranton · · Score: 1

      If you look at current Tesla cars as a guideline, the biggest option will probably be a $10-12k performance option that gets closer to 4.5s 0-60. There will be a $3k premium interior option. A few $500-$2000 paint colors and tire options. A few $1000-$3000 options like high fidelity sound, smart air suspension, and autopilot features.

      All together most cars without the performance option will cost around $40k, and $50-55k with the performance option. There will certainly be some people getting the base model, but most of these early adopters are not going to be that budget driven.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    5. Re:Let's do the math by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      Which is nothing if you're an urbanite living in a major US city. But there's the additional cost of getting the charger purchased and installed, no?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Let's do the math by AaronW · · Score: 1

      No, the price is before the subsidy.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    7. Re:Let's do the math by ranton · · Score: 1

      Which is nothing if you're an urbanite living in a major US city. But there's the additional cost of getting the charger purchased and installed, no?

      True, I have heard figures that range from $500 to a couple thousand for the electrical work.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    8. Re:Let's do the math by SpiceWare · · Score: 1
      The charger is built into the car, you just need a power outlet to plug into. The power cable is modular and has adaptors for different outlets.

      * NEMA 5-15, a standard 120 outlet, will recharge at the rate of 3 miles per hour
      * NEMA 5-20, a standard 120 outlet that supports more amps, will recharge at the rate of 4 miles per hour
      * NEMA 14-50, a standard 240 outlet (used for electric stoves), will recharge at the rate of 29 miles per hour

      For people with short enough commutes, a standard 120 outlet will work just fine, else just get a NEMA 14-50 installed in your garage.

      Rates from Telsa's Model S Charging Guide (click on Adapter Guide in the Outlet Charging section).

      Adapters for other standard outlets are available though sadly they dropped the NEMA 14-30 one, which is typically used for electric cloths dryers (which would have been handy when visiting family).

    9. Re:Let's do the math by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      In the event someone needs a tow for a recharge, where does one go to find a place to recharge? Are there designated charging stations that accept a credit card swipe? Are they proprietary or NEMA 14-50 too? I know getting a tow is expensive, so it might be worth charging for 20 minutes or so enough to return home. OTOH, if you can afford a Tesla, paying the tow driver to haul it back home directly is just a "convenience fee".

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  13. Reservations. Not pre-orders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me, "pre-order" implies a commitment to buy. That's definitely not the case with this system - it's more like a reservation system. Pay Tesla $1000 to reserve your place in the queue for a Model 3, get a full refund if you decide to drop out of the queue.

    Mind you, $325 million in cash flowing into the company is no small thing - that'll help them build up the tooling and other factory-related matters they need to be able to produce the car.

    What I find myself wondering is: how much can that demand be sustained? Let's assume that none of the 325,000 people who have put money down opt out when they finally see the production model and have a chance to drive it. What will be the sustained demand once the initial rush has been dealt with? 1000 vehicles a month? Five thousand? Ten? A hundred thousand? That's what's hard to predict, but it's also what Tesla needs to predict - there's no value to the company to tool up to be able to produce, say, fifty thousand vehicles a month if they can only sell twenty thousand a month.

    Don't get me wrong. This is good news for Tesla; it's indicative that there is substantial demand for a good quality electric vehicle with a decent range, and a ready-made charging infrastructure. And I'm hoping that the demand is on the higher end, not the lower end, for multiple reasons. But there's still a lot of unknowns (including just how many of those 325,000 will drop out nearer production time); it's too early yet to make a definitive statement one way or the other. Cautious optimism, I think, is the best approach from here...

  14. $1000 reserve fee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking instead of dumping $1000 on the reserve fee, it might just be better to buy $1000 of tesla stock

    At today's price of $257, that would just be four shares.

    Yes, you wouldn't get the car reserved, but I'm not too keen on buying a 1st generation car sight unseen. If tesla was offering me interest on the $1000 then maybe, but I think I can make more with the stock.

    Thoughts? (and yes, I know, the stock could go down)

    1. Re:$1000 reserve fee... by CMU_Ken · · Score: 2

      Price to earnings ratio on TSLA is unrealistic - current investors are either short or they are emotionally invested (and financially invested). Better to wait for TSLA to have a bad week and buy than to buy now while it's already on the upswing. Just my $0.02. Buy low, sell high. Buy high and hope to sell higher doesn't usually work out so well.

    2. Re:$1000 reserve fee... by AaronW · · Score: 1

      The stock is quite volatile. I'm kicking myself that I didn't buy a lot more stock at $38. I bought some stock rather than put money in for a future battery replacement before I got my model S in 2013. I can buy many replacement batteries having spent far on the stock. If Tesla is able to execute I think there is a good upside. Tesla could be profitable any time they want but instead they are investing big time on R&D and building out their factories. I may be emotionally invested, but every single investment I have made (not following anyone else's advice) has done extremely well in the long term. Would I buy more stock now? Only if I see a big dip, and I'm kicking myself that I didn't do that the last time.

      Tesla has proven that they have strong demand for their products without any advertising other than their showrooms, though I heard that the Superchargers are budgeted under marketing.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    3. Re:$1000 reserve fee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're short, you're not an investor.

    4. Re:$1000 reserve fee... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Not looking at their stock, I would say it would probably have been a much better investment the day before this announcement even.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  15. gotta watch the conditionals, folks by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...If it sells every car that's been reserved..."

    I'm going to call it here, that less than 100,000 - maybe even less than 50k - actually turn into real orders.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:gotta watch the conditionals, folks by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Based on what? Pent-up interest in transitioning away from fossil fuels? The incredible price point? Tesla's good safety and reliability record? I don't see what's so hard to believe about these numbers.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:gotta watch the conditionals, folks by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Most likely based on Tesla's inability to deliver in a timely fashion, given the enormous leap in production capacity required. (Five times their total deliveries to date, thirty times their largest year to date.) Buyer's remorse when it comes time to pony up the balance and actually order the car will also play a factor.

    3. Re:gotta watch the conditionals, folks by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Pent-up interest in transitioning away from fossil fuels?

      If there was, there exist options at this price point already.

      The incredible price point?

      I continue to be amused at what people consider to be a good price point. The $35k is the base model, much like $70K is the base price of the Model S, but almost no Model S go for anywhere near that, $100k is closer to the average.

      I expect most Model 3 to be closer to $50K than $35K.

      Tesla's good safety and reliability record?

      They don't have enough of a record to call it that. People buying $100K cars aren't the normal public and they aren't driven the same way.

    4. Re:gotta watch the conditionals, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that you have to pay $1000 to preorder one right? What are these people paying for?

    5. Re:gotta watch the conditionals, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that every single car they make is sold right? There is a waiting list right now for both the S and the X.

  16. Re:uhhh no, CoD? by uncqual · · Score: 2

    It's not $14b - only $1,000 per car so it's only $350m by the most generous interpretation. Those putting down their $1,000 have NO obligation to ever give Tesla another dime and Tesla has an obligation to return the money on demand for quite some time so, arguably, it's really $0b. Tesla can't book these deposits as revenue.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  17. Just goes to show by guruevi · · Score: 1

    People WANT a car manufacturer to make quality products they stand behind and are (relatively) cheap to own and operate as well. GM/VW/Honda could learn something about what the consumer wants. We don't want expensive mechanical hybrids or miniature cars with 50 mile range.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Just goes to show by AaronW · · Score: 1

      The problem the other car manufacturers have is the dealerships. Dealerships make most of their money from service and financing, mostly from service. There's a lot less service for EVs. Elon has also said that they don't want service to be a cash cow like it is for dealerships. Dealerships will even lose money on a car if they know they can make it up with service and or financing. Dealerships don't have the manufacturer's best interest, either. Dealerships will push the cars that make them the most money, and it's not a car that requires less service.

      EVs need a lot less service than ICE vehicles. There are far fewer moving parts. On my model S, the electric motor is lubricated for 12 years. There are no regular oil changes. There's no belts to change, spark plugs to replace or engine air filters. They can't try and tell you you need your injectors cleaned. There's no fuel pump, transmission or clutch. Even the brakes will last a lot longer due to regenerative braking. There are only a dozen moving parts in the entire drivetrain from what I have been told. There are not a bunch of things bolted onto an engine since they're all electric. The power steering and AC compressor are electric. An electric AC compressor is totally sealed and is typically a lot more reliable than one driven off of the engine. There is no starter motor to go out or alternator to go out. There's no ignition system to wear out. I don't even need to take it in to flash firmware updates. There still is a 12V battery, though. For a while they were going through those quickly until one of their software updates reduced the heavy cycling of the AGM battery that tended to kill it every 12-16 months.

      The AC induction motor has no friction points except the bearings on the shaft. A well-designed power inverter should last a very long time. Even the batteries should last a long time. Panasonic says the ones in my car will have 80% capacity after 3000 cycles. That's over 600,000 miles! Even if they do have to replace the battery, it takes very little time (the battery swap station at Harris Ranch takes around 3 minutes to do a battery swap). Removing the motor and inverter is also fairly simple to replace compared to a gasoline engine since the number of hookups is significantly less and the whole module just drops from the bottom of the car.

      There is still service that needs to be done. I have yearly service on my model S. They perform a wheel alignment, rotate the tires, fill the windshield fluid, change the wiper blades, change the cabin air filter and check everything. Every couple of years they also flush the brake fluid and I wouldn't be surprised they change the coolant.

      I sold my old Prius to my parents. The touch screen later stopped accepting touch input. The dealer wants well over 5K to replace it with well over $1K for labor. According to a Youtube video I found it takes less than 20 minutes to replace yourself, and replacement units can be bought on Ebay for under $300.

      On my model S I accidentally broke one of the clips on top of my car for a roof rack. The only way to repair it is to replace the entire panel, which has a clear-coat finish on it. Total cost, including labor to replace it? $175. If it had been my Prius, Toyota would have found a way to charge over $1000.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    2. Re:Just goes to show by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

      ^^^^ this.

      I have an EV as well as an ICE. I went with the ICE dealership I did because they weren't dicks like every other Subaru dealership I visited. It's a very small dealership and seems to value their customers. That does not seem to be the average dealership situation.

      That said, they've made a lot more from maintenance than from the original sale. As parent said, sometimes they sell below cost (I got a Toyota Landcruiser below cost, by hitting the right day of the month). I have over 200,000 miles on that Subaru and it's been a good car, but it has had it's problems and they've made good money on me keeping that ICE going.

      So far my EV has been in for 3 services. Each one of those consisted of rotating the tires. Now, it's got 30,000 miles versus 200,000 but still... tire rotations only. Sweet.

      On the subject of buying cars through dealerships. One of the cars I've considered is a Ford Focus RS. The problem people are having is that it's a small production run, so if your dealership doesn't have an allocation you probably won't get one. Problems? The dealers lie to you and tell you they have allocations when they don't (one guy put his order in October and found out in March that the dealer lied and he really didn't have a car ordered. There's no way you can check whether the dealer is lying. Also, dealers have been charging up to $10,000 above MSRP because they see it as a rare car and they want to stiff buyers as much as possible. One guy talked about calling 50 different dealerships trying to find an available allocation that would sell at MSRP. Basically, the dealerships don't care about building a relationship with you. They may say they do (and a few probably do) but it seems like a large percentage exist by screwing over their customers. Maybe Ford tries to be good to the customers, but the entire dealership thing they are saddled with is set up to screw everybody but the dealership owner (I think the salespeople are victimized almost as much as the customers).

      Contrast that with the ordering process with Tesla? Go onto a single website, configure your Model S or X, done. And, from what I can see of Tesla owners' reports, Tesla seems to bend over backwards to try to make them happy with their purchase. I've read many many stories about the service organization at Tesla going well beyond in order to help the owner. This is the kind of company I want to deal with, not dealerships which are set up to screw me over.

      Dealerships seem to be the sociopaths of the automobile industry. Tesla so far has demonstrated the opposite. I'm happy to buy a Model 3 from them.

    3. Re:Just goes to show by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I am sure that Tesla will pull the Dell move and just sell direct to customers and piss off all the resellers along the way...

      If they reach critical mass... the game will change quickly.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  18. Re:uhhh no, CoD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True.

    However, that misses the point. It's not about Tesla booking the deposits as revenue. It's about Tesla getting an influx of cash - over three hundred million of it, in fact - that they can use to help build the factories and tooling for the vehicle. Yes, in an absolute, strict sense, that cash is balanced by a liability on the balance sheet. But I'd say the odds are that the vast majority of that three hundred million will be Tesla's, up until they start getting ready to deliver the vehicles and ask people to pony up the balance.

    It also gives Tesla a reasonably firm idea of how many vehicles they need to make to meet demand. Yes, there's an initial influx of pent-up demand from people who really want an EV but haven't seen sufficient appeal in current models (or can't afford the Model S or X), so it's not a reliable indicator of long-term, steady-state demand, but the fact that they got over 300,000 reservations in very short order, when they expected only 100,000 or so, says that the demand is probably going to be greater than they originally thought.

    Overall, I'd consider the situation to be a pretty positive one for Tesla. Time will tell, of course, but I'm comfortable sitting on my reservation for the (expected) 3-4 years it'll take them to reach my market.

  19. No. Just No. by Brannon · · Score: 0

    Your battery is not a brick in 8 years. That's fucking retarded.

    Completely replacing the battery in 8 years will be cheap--it's already not that expensive.

    Gas prices won't stay low forever.

  20. That is without a doubt the stupidest prediction by Brannon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that I've ever seen on Slashdot. And I clearly remember "No wifi, less space than a Nomad, lame".

    I will meet you back here in 4 years and then stalk you through every thread reminding you of this prediction. This god awful, hilariously stupid fucking prediction.

    Tesla sold more that 50K Model S's last year--and that's a car with an ASP north of $85K. This year they are selling more than 80K Model S's + Model X's (the ASP on Model X's is even higher). And you think they won't manage 50K of a car that starts at $35K? You sir, are an idiot.

    Not like an everyday "noone is going to buy iPads" kind of idiot, but like a platinum-level "noone is going to buy these stupid Model T Fords" kind of idiot--the kind that only comes around once every 100 years or so.

  21. Re:That is without a doubt the stupidest predictio by friedmud · · Score: 1

    lol.

    That is all. I just needed to let you know that I was literally laughing-out-loud at this.

    Absolutely spot on. It felt great to see one of these asshats with the ridiculous negative hyperboles around here get called out.

    Well done.

  22. Re:That is without a doubt the stupidest predictio by Gussington · · Score: 1

    You win today's internet :)

  23. don't call it a launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until you actually deliver the goods, and in a significant volume.

  24. Maintaining a constant supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One of the biggest problems with a pre-order system like this for manufactured goods is maintaining a constant supply rate.

    Tesla have had 320000 pre-orders, and those people will justifiably want their cars delivered as early as possible; after all, they've ordered them and paid a cash deposit more than a year before the planned start of delivery.

    Clearly some of them will have to wait. But at current production rates, that wait will be over six years for some, which really isn't tenable. Even allowing for increased production rates, a two year wait for a car of this size/price isn't going to be good enough. So Tesla could try to ramp up production; try say they have capacity to ramp up to deliver 500k cars a year, so delivering all of the preorders in the first year could be done.

    However, the problem then is maintaining the momentum. The pre-orders represent the people who fundamentally want the car and are prepared to pay early and wait. But once those orders have been fulfilled, if your factory is producing 300k cars a year, you're going to need to find 300k more buyers each year, or else cut production.

    I agree that Tesla has a fantastic product, and I'm sure that in the longer term there is a market for them to build that many, but you can't just start producing that kind of number of cars from day one because the market is already saturated, and also because they don't have the infrastructure to back it up.

    In other words, they're going to need to be really careful about balancing the need to meet those pre-orders in a reasonable time while not flooding the market.

    All of the above is without even factoring in the Models S and X, which also complicates things... how much of the production run should be given to those models? Does that eat into the ability to deliver the Model 3 pre-orders? Does delivering Model 3s instead create a backlog in the orderbook for S and X? What ratio of production will bring the best profit figures?

  25. that's not musk, it's shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a total crock of shit. Literally, every announcement from Tesla has fine print at the bottom disclaiming everything they said (or if it doesn't, it should!).

    Is Joe Isuzu running the company? They make a reasonable car, I don't know why they resort to bizarre half truths.

  26. Re:uhhh no, CoD? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    so it's only $350m by the most generous interpretation

    Huh. What would be the least generous interpretation?

  27. Appletards and their reality distortion field... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the reality distortion field is strong with this one.

    You said it brother!

    Oh... wait... you didn't mean Apple's reality distortion field?
    Cause 13 million iPhones, even if they were all bought straight up, not "upgraded", and if they were all 128GB models come out to $849 * 13000000 = $11.037 billion.

    Last I checked, that's about 3 billion dollars less than 14 billion dollars mentioned in the summary.
    And that's if everyone bought the priciest option available.
    That's some distortion field to miss 3 billion dollars... probably more.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  28. Bought my 1998 VW Bug unseen by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    I don't know - if you want to be first you need to take a risk. I saw the New Beetle on a TV show over Christmas vacation in 1998 and in January plunked my deposit down. The dealership didn't even have brochures yet - or any details really. Said I was the second person to make a deposit.

    Matter of fact - I had to list my favorite 3 car colors up-front on the order because they didn't know who was going to get what. The dealer simply said, "they are going to call me and say 'there are 10 cars available currently in, black, green, red...which ones you want?" hah - I didn't even know if it was going to be Red, Blue, or Manual shift. I had to prioritize my options (I want stick most, red color, but will take blue or green).

    Seriously - I didn't know how big/small the car would be. When it arrived they let me drive it around the parking lot with the plastic wrapper still on it. It was like driving a spaceship - totally cool. And I was the only one on the road for weeks - talk about being a rock star.

    You want that experience? You gotta be first. And there's no test drive. .

    You can *always* sell it. I could have sold it a month later for $5k (+) over what I paid ...but kept it for 10 years.

    1. Re:Bought my 1998 VW Bug unseen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm not that impatient, and I don't care if people think I'm a rock star. Beetles had a very brief blip of high demand and then were quickly offered at a deep discount. They are indeed nice little machines for a one or two-person household, and quite fast.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  29. Re:uhhh no, CoD? by uncqual · · Score: 1

    0$ -- since every person can simply request their deposit back (perhaps because the price of the car goes up or Tesla can't deliver in a reasonable timeframe or ...)

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  30. complex? by famebait · · Score: 1

    complex production goals.

    Granted, there are plenty of downsides to imaginary cars, but surely producing them is not the biggest hurdle.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  31. Re:That is without a doubt the stupidest predictio by SomeoneFromBelgium · · Score: 1

    Never blame on ignorance what can be explained by pure white glowing hate. Hate against all those idiots who have anything to do with environmentalism.
    Doing something about the climate is bad!
    We should keep doing things exactly like we are doing them today!
    Don't. Change. A. Thing!