Slashdot Mirror


Small and Heavy Arms Traded On Facebook By Libyan Militants (rt.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A report entitled "The Online Trade of Light Weapons in Libya" on Thursday revealed machine guns, grenade launchers and anti-tank missiles are being traded in Libya via Facebook. Some of the weapons include those supplied by the U.S. allies to their Libyan proxies, while most come from raids by militants on the arsenals of former Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. "Many of the players in this new market began to use new technologies to hawk their wares," the paper says. Online sales from social media platforms such as Facebook "are one of the tools currently being used for this purpose." Machine guns made up the bulk of the Facebook offers, including six Soviet-made 12,7mm DShKMs, 11 14,5mm KPVs, and one Belgian 12,7mm FN Browning M2-type heavy machine gun. Large-caliber anti-material sniper rifles and a handful of other weapons have also been advertised on Facebook, according to the research.

60 comments

  1. So what? by mmiscool · · Score: 1

    Its crazy to think that people would discuss a business transaction using a web based communication platform.

    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its crazy to think that people would discuss a business transaction using a web based communication platform.

      But if they're using it anyway -- would this give the government an excuse to shut down Facebook? 'Bout time those new powers for "fighting terrorism" were put to a good use!

    2. Re:So what? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Just gives trump strike 2
      1 H1B abuse

    3. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its crazy to think that people would discuss a business transaction using a web based communication platform.

      Since when has the availability of better ways EVER stopped people from doing what was trendy?

  2. Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is a lie! Trading guns is illegal and not allowed by Facebook!

    1. Re:Ridiculous! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Well, maybe in the US where it's essentially exercising 1A and 2A rights - that should be banned, after all. But it's fine in Libya and other places overseas because it's part of their culture and Facebook would show microaggressions if they didn't allow such trades and discussions to take place.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:Ridiculous! by the_povinator · · Score: 1

      Facebook should have never added the "buy this weapon" button. What did they think people were going to use it for??

      --
      The .sig is dead, and I believe I had a hand in killing it.
  3. Plutonium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So can we now finally build a timetravelling delorean with plutonium stolen from libian terrorist ?

    1. Re:Plutonium? by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 1

      "Great Scott! 12.7mm DShKMs?"

  4. Jokes on them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I gave them a shoddy bomb casing full of used pinball machine parts.

    1. Re:Jokes on them... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Run for it, Marty!

  5. aboutface by zlives · · Score: 0

    terror book

  6. "Some" weapons came from US allies? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    How 'bout all of them? Russia's share of the market has dwindled significantly during the Obama years. Hillary's legacy is one to be real proud of, eh?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      New rule: Don't invade a country (no matter how bad the dictator) unless you're willing to stick around and pick up the pieces.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Well, she did have to do SOMETHING to show her worth, in light of the giving guns to Mexican drug lords operation her counterparts in the DOJ were running. Can't let State be outdone by Justice after all!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Good rule, but it would be beneficial if the subsequent Administration also stuck around to finish the job.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I pin this on American citizens as much as on their leaders (if not more).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      How about not lying about the blood on your hands.

    6. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      We are a fickle lot!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    7. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That's funny. You're not that naive. I know you're not. So, I gotta ask... You really don't think you're allowed to make the rules, do you?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm only allowed to make 1/300,000,000th of the rules.....

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:"Some" weapons came from US allies? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Heh... If we're lucky they'll pretend to listen. ;-)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  7. It just hasn't been... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    FBs day.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  8. Oh my god... by thedarb · · Score: 4, Funny

    they found me, I don't know how but they found me. Run for it, Marty!

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  9. Bid increment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't find the Facebook bid increment anywhere.

  10. The real question is... by BigU+03C0in · · Score: 2

    How is Zuck going to monetize this?

    1. Re:The real question is... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Facebook VPN only $4.99/mo and we will never give the backdoor to the FBI, CIA, NSA, KGB, SAPD, LAPD, MI6, etc.

  11. Well done Hillary by zapadnik · · Score: 1

    This was Hillary Clinton's war to prove her foreign policy bona fides for her presidential run. What a disaster !

    1. Re:Well done Hillary by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Trolling pretty hard today, aren't you?

      If we use the assumption this was Hillary's fault (it isn't but go with me), then we can also state with equal certainty the invasion and occupation of Iraq was entirely Bush's fault as was the rise of ISIS which was a direct result of his lies.

      Well done Bush. What a disaster!

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Well done Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary's support was pivotal to Obama's decision in joining the Libyan war.

    3. Re:Well done Hillary by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative
      John Brennan, President Obama's appointed director of the CIA, states otherwise:

      [ISIS] was, you know, pretty much decimated when US forces were there in Iraq. It had maybe 700-or-so adherents left. And then it grew quite a bit in the last several years, when it split then from al-Qaida in Syria, and set up its own organization.

      Seems that Brennan claims it was basically dead when President Bush handed it over to President Obama. And it's grown since then...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Well done Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you can youtube Biden, in 2010, saying that Iraq was going to be this administration's greatest accomplishments.

  12. 18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Wow: A whole 18 machine guns - man-portable ones from 1933 and 1938, and a vehicle-mounted version from 1949 (suitable for taking potshots at WW II aircraft, if you have a set of four working together, mounted on a trailer behind your Jeep).

    There are collectors with far more than that many. I think typical shipments from nation-states to their anti-establishment proxies have more than that many per package.

    Somehow I don't think they've found the underground arms market that's arming any major insurgency.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  13. Facebook Weapons bazaar? by khz6955 · · Score: 2

    Is there a link to this Facebook weapons bazaar?

  14. I thought that Groupon looked fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOGO?

  15. SpaceX Nailed it. by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

    The landing of the first stage on a freaking barge was pretty damn impressive.

    --
    Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
    1. Re:SpaceX Nailed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad we can't say the same for the landing of your comment...

  16. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by chiefmojorising · · Score: 1

    The Browning .50 dates to WW I. We *still* use them today, and as far as I know there aren't any plans to replace them. Weapons in this class are simply nowhere near obsolete.

  17. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by godel_56 · · Score: 2

    Wow: A whole 18 machine guns - man-portable ones from 1933 and 1938, and a vehicle-mounted version from 1949 (suitable for taking potshots at WW II aircraft, if you have a set of four working together, mounted on a trailer behind your Jeep).

    There are collectors with far more than that many. I think typical shipments from nation-states to their anti-establishment proxies have more than that many per package.

    Somehow I don't think they've found the underground arms market that's arming any major insurgency.

    , , , and MANPAD and antitank missiles.

    From second link; "The research group recorded 1,346 sales over the course of the last 18 months and found between 250 and 300 sales posts went up each month." That's maybe not huge, but more than you've quoted.

  18. Should be easy to find them ... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    with Facebooks real name policy. /s

    1. Re:Should be easy to find them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true. I thought I was safe in dealing weapons on Facebook, but then Facebook forced me to use my real name even through I didn't want to and now I am totally afraid of being caught and thrown in Gitmo.

      - Yours truly,

      Yolo McSwagville

  19. Putin's propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again Slashdot is citing Putin's propaganda machine.

  20. I'm in the market by BoberFett · · Score: 1

    Cool. Do they take PayPal?

  21. A Libya in perpetual civil war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pentagon's mission accomplished. The world needs to wake up and stand united against the U.S and their proxy wars and illegal invasions.

    1. Re:A Libya in perpetual civil war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world needs to wake up and stand united against the U.S and their proxy wars and illegal invasions.

      Or, just acknowledge the game at hand and play along. If the places US wants to invade simply pretend to be decimated and invaded, etc. via propaganda, then we can avoid all this bloodshed and still manipulate the people of earth into a New World Order (link includes top politicians using this term). Either way the outcome will be the same. Oh, and in case you haven't been paying attention. USA = Muscle. UK = Finance. Vatican = Ideology. Libya, then Syria, next is Iran on the chopping block whether anyone wants it or not. Fact is, it's not beholden to the internationalist bankers, and its ideology is counter to the Vatican's, so the US will muscle them up after tricking them into getting a nuke (or planting evidence thereof).

      Get on board with the NWO or get turned into rubble. The choice is yours. I don't like it either, but them's the breaks. What are you going to do about it? Start WWIII? That's exactly the end game these elites want...

  22. corporate fascism by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    arms are big money in the USA. From certain point of view you could say our main exports are maiming and death.

    1. Re:corporate fascism by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      It's not only the US.
      Any large arms manufacturing corporation is more than eager to star wars in order to sell wepons/ammo. Coupled with the desire of countries to test new weapons/ammo and you've got the explanation for all the wars/armed conflicts/police actions in the world.
      Oh, yeah, tinfoil on.

    2. Re:corporate fascism by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      if you add greed for resources to the list of desires I'll agree. Usually the same groups invest in that along with the arms

  23. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God, the military has failed to integrate into the consumer society! Burn the heretics with a flood of selfie flash lights!

  24. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by swb · · Score: 1

    But those particular guns might be if they're that old. Barrels and the moving parts of the system can wear out, rendering them either less than useful or maybe even dangerous to the operator.

    It's not like the military is necessarily fielding the *same* .50 Browning machine guns they used circa 1920. Even if they were, it would kind of be like ship of Theseus. The same gun, maybe, but with all new parts.

  25. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Eh, about what 2 local-to-me FB groups had for "gun for sale" posts up until the recent policy change... I even bought and sold a couple via them. Only 2 machine guns listed in the whole time I remember... buddy of mine bought one of them, he's still waiting on his tax stamp but the FFL/SOT he's using for the transfer has a range so at least he has "visitation rights" until the stamp comes in. I should buy him a "stamp collector" t-shirt....

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  26. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Tuidjy · · Score: 2

    I wish people would make at least an attempt at informing themselves before they try to be authoritative about things they do not understand.

    First of all, the Dushki in questions are Ms, which means that they are not from the Thirties. They date at the very least from the late Forties, and were manufactured well into the Eighties. I remember when we started replacing them in Bulgaria, and we were manufacturing the NSV (Nikitin-Sokolov-Volkov) ourselves. Countries that did not manufacture the superseding machine guns (NSV or Kord) must have kept theirs. In the early 2000s, the DShks were still one of the most common heavy machine gun. They are not obsolete by any means.

    Second, those guns have proved themselves against relatively modern planes and helicopters, as the British (for some reason) have been learning through the Eighties, Nineties and Oughts.

    Third, this heavy machine gun is a pretty solid piece of work. The barrel you have to keep keep replacing anyway, if you ever use it in earnest, but the rest of it is solid and lasts for long time. I remember tinkering with the three heavies we had in the 80s in Bulgaria, and the dushka was the one with the simplest, most solid inner workings.

    Fourth, I am sure that GAU-19 and Kord are much superior, but those are probably orders of magnitude more expensive, and probably impossible to get unless you are well connected (which unfortunately describes the people in whose facilities ISIS goes shopping) So a DShk is still a very desirable machine gun, and in a completely different class from RPKs, let alone good ole AKs and their ilk.

    So, no, these are not museum pieces, but rather effective death dealing machines.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  27. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. I gave it 18 likes.

  28. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh. My are has three dealers large enough to do that every month including an occasional small artillery piece or functional tank changing owners.

  29. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent post! Unfortunately, you just scared the hell out of these kids on slashdot, and showed that the others have no idea what the are talking about.

  30. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by swb · · Score: 1

    I don't doubt East Bloc design heavy machine guns are simple and reliable, but they're still machines, and in the case of Libya, being stored and operated in one of the worst environments for any machine with moving parts and mating surfaces.

    And for the last couple of years, used, maintained and stored by irregulars without any specific education in their operation and maintenance. I'm sure even conscripts in Bulgaria were basically mechanical engineers in comparison to their recent Libyan operators.

    Basically, they're gonna wear and at best become less reliable and at worst become unusable.

    My guess, though, is that as long as any heavy machine gun fires semi-reliably, even if the barrel is shot, it's still a pretty formidable weapon out to a few hundred meters. 12.x mm HMG projectiles are lethal and destructive even at substandard velocity and in a lot of cases volume of fire will make up for what's lost in accuracy, at least at ground targets.

  31. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    From second link; "The research group recorded 1,346 sales over the course of the last 18 months and found between 250 and 300 sales posts went up each month."

    And how does that compare to, say, the classified section of (the somewhat misnamed) Shotgun News?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  32. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    rt.com is Russian state propaganda. You should know it is bogus when you see the domain.

    I only came in to see if anybody noticed. No, they were too busy making jokes I guess.

  33. Re:18 machine guns? (Yawn!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Erm, you know this is /., right?
    We don't deal with facts or correct info here, we're in for the laughs.