Slashdot Mirror


Senate Bill Draft Would Prohibit Unbreakable Encryption (ap.org)

buck-yar quotes a report from the Associated Press: "A draft version of a Senate bill would effectively prohibit unbreakable encryption and require companies to help the government access data on a computer or mobile device with a warrant."
The two Senators finalizing the bill announced "No individual or company is above the law," saying their goal is to ensure compliance with court orders to help law enforcement or to provide decrypted information. The ACLU's legislative counsel argued the drafted legislation represents a "clear threat to everyone's privacy and security," and the bill is opposed by another member of the Senate committee, Ron Wyden, who says it would require "American companies to build a backdoor... They would be required by federal law per this statute to decide how to weaken their products to make Americans less safe."

4 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Write your senator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good time to drop them a letter AND an email AND a phone call AND a fax while at it. Go on, do what's expected of you but too few of you actually do.

  2. Re:Before everyone gets up in arms about this... by click2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No this bill was introduced so when it fails and they introduce a slightly les offensive bill it will pass.

    Its like how people will vote for someone based on them being "not as bad as some previous guy"

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  3. They brought this on themselves by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The NSA and FBI brought this on themselves. Before all the spying on everyone, parallel construction, and warrant less use of stingray plus secret courts, nobody was all that much interested in consumer products with unbreakable encryption.

    If they want to blame someone for this, they need to look in a mirror and understand that their operations are just plain creepy and incompatible with a free country. They are starting to smell like the Stasi and a significant portion of the citizens of this country don't care to give them any more of a foothold.

  4. Re:This... by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unenforceable; impractical; in the final analysis, stupid.

    You folks still aren't getting it. The law provides probable cause against anyone using unbreakable encryption (like such a thing exists). If the cops can't decipher your communications, they can bust the door down, take everything and arrest you on mere suspicion.

    The sad thing is that these laws are such an easy sell to the panicky and actually very authoritarian public.

    And there's that name, Feinstein, again. Fascism in a dress.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”