Slashdot Mirror


'Record Store Day' Creates Vinyl Logjam (newyorker.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Today is Record Store Day, an event which includes exclusive vinyl releases distributed only through record stores. But besides complaints about scalpers hoarding the limited-edition releases, musicians and labels say the event monopolizes all of the available production capacity for pressing vinyl records, creating delays as long as six months and inflating vinyl record prices as high as $30. "The bottleneck persists even though plants work around the clock for months to accommodate the surge in orders leading up to Record Store Day," writes the New Yorker, noting that the demand for vinyl records has now increased six-fold over the last eight years.

Part of the problem appears to be big labels. (One insisted on printing 2,100 copies of their 1974 novelty hit "Kung Fu Fighting" for the independent record store event, the New Yorker notes, "meaning that an up-and-coming band's new album could, in theory, be delayed.") Meanwhile, with current techniques, one production plant still has to scrap up to 20% of the records it presses due to quality issues -- although in the last four months, two companies have introduced new faster technologies for pressing vinyl records.

This year's records include a Dr. Who track called "Genesis of the Daleks" and a track from the "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" soundtrack on a vinyl picture disc, as well as releases from Anthrax, David Bowie, Johnny Cash, Miles Davis, the Flaming Lips, and even Devo members Mark Mothersbaugh and Gerald Casale. Metallica -- this year's "ambassador" for the event -- plans to stream a live performance at Rasputin Records in Berkeley California.)

16 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Fetishization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fetishization of vinyl is for posers. The same kind of posers who fetishize $10,000 audio ethernet cables.

    What matters most is mastering. A poorly mastered vinyl release will sound like shit compared to a quality mastering on CD or even an MP3. And then there is degradation and convenience, digital never degrades and is easily copied, shared, backed-up and stored. Given an identical mastering, the only reason to prefer vinyl is if you care about something other than audio quality.

    1. Re:Fetishization by Transist · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't think that's entirely fair to a lot of vinyl 'enthusiasts'. I am not one myself, but I can appreciate why people like it. The ritual of playing a record on vinyl restores some sense of intimacy with the music. I have several friends who collect vinyl, and none of them are remotely interested in snake oil audiophile products. Hell, half of them use cheap, unimpressive old speakers. Perhaps that's part of the aesthetic?

    2. Re:Fetishization by ottawanker · · Score: 2

      Just because something 'sounds better' doesn't mean it's higher quality. Take a listen to some vinyl, and I think you'll at least be able to agree that it sounds different. If it does sound different, some people might think that it might sound better..

    3. Re:Fetishization by ottawanker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lots of vinyl has been mastered 'better' than CDs. Basically anything in the 'loudness war' that was released on both vinyl and CD will sound better on vinyl, because it won't constantly be clipping (Red Hot Chili Peppers' Californication is an album I can't stand to listen to on CD).

    4. Re:Fetishization by Nutria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a CD player and record player at one point. CDs sounded better. (Less scratch/pop/hiss.)

      And much more convenient.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Fetishization by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True but that is the fault of the sound engineers who mixed it, the artists who approved it.

      It is possible to make a digital version of that vinyl that sounds better. It required talent and care. Two things the music industry greatly lacks.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  2. Non-issue? by Transist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a sell-proclaimed audiophile I can appreciate the point of the article- limited production capacity, high demand, and large budget production runs leave little capacity and long delays for small vinyl releases- but I can't see this really being much of a tragedy. If you're wanting the music itself, a digital copy with superior quality is just a few clicks away. If you're in it for the novelty of vinyl, well you clearly enjoy ritual, waiting, and inconvenience. It would probably make actually receiving the plate all the more rewarding. Vinyl demand has shot up fairly aggressively in recent years. Production capacity will meet demand eventually. When it does. the only thing that will maintain the novelty of vinyl will probably be artificial scarcity and inflated prices.

    1. Re:Non-issue? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      You obviously have zero clue how to play a record.

      you do NOT throw it on the turntable.

      You put on a cotton glove, carefully remove the record from the sleeve, then carefully place it on a dampening mat on the turntable, you now zero stat it with a static dissipation device and then hit it lightly with a dust removal super soft brush. then you can spin up the turntable wait for it to get to speed, then carefully lower the needle on the record once it hit speed.

      My computer boots from OFF in less than 15 seconds. it takes at LEAST 15 seconds to get the record safely on the turntable and the static dissipation applied.

      Unless you love the experience of buttloads of pops and clicks as well as damaging a $580 cartridge on your technics turntable... you do it right.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Non-issue? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If this vinyl thing gets much bigger, it will no longer be cool.

    3. Re:Non-issue? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not all of us live in countries where we can happily piss 100watts of power continuously into the wind. Admittedly the parent's basement dwellers may not realise electricity has a cost.

    4. Re:Non-issue? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Ahhh yes the ever practical but you can get things low power enough to keep them always on and don't consider any of the actual performance or use cases involved with a computer.

      I sure as heck won't be replacing my video editing machine with an ultra-low power laptop, and I'm sure you agree buying an entire laptop for the soul purpose of making sure your music is available 15 seconds faster is not really a great use for money, or a laptop.

    5. Re:Non-issue? by mbstone · · Score: 2

      This is how you play multiple vinyl records: You use a record-changing turntable.

      1. Stack a bunch of records on top of one another on the spindle.
      2. When a record finishes, the next record will drop down on top of the record(s) already on the turntable.
      3. This is good for 80-100 minutes of music depending on the number of stacked records supported by the device.

      No need for expensive cleaning cloths or solutions as long as you are able to buy more copies of your records.

  3. Re:Digital streaming from a record store? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    Would is sound better with earplugs?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  4. What is attraction for under 30 crowd? by kencurry · · Score: 2

    I'm over 50, grew up on vinyl records, so I like vinyl for the combination of nostalgia and having grown up with classic 70's era album masters. My vote for all-time best recording for vinyl is Supertramp's "Crime of the Century." But you had to look for quality recordings and pressings. We would seek out import version of our favorite bands, as they tended to come from higher quality masters and (sometimes) came in more interesting covers/jackets.

    What do millennial and younger crowd love about vinyl? why do think it is regaining in popularity? Please post.

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    1. Re:What is attraction for under 30 crowd? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      What do millennial and younger crowd love about vinyl? why do think it is regaining in popularity? Please post.

      Hipsters buy them so they can take photos of them with their Polaroid cameras which they then take a photo of with their phones to upload on Instagram with an old cross-processing filter applied.

      Seriously though I know someone who buys it as art for his bookshelf then goes and downloads some MP3s to load on his HiFi. The dead giveaway is how much dust is on the record player despite having a relatively recent and new looking vinyl collection.

  5. Why is this modded "Funny"? by mykepredko · · Score: 2, Informative

    I grew up in the '70s - if you considered yourself anything other than a loser that didn't know anything about audio, this is what you did.

    That and worry about:
    - Your turntable (always wanted a direct drive for providing the most accurate 33 RPM)
    - Arm (had to be balanced to minimized forces on the cartridge, needle and record)
    - Cartridge
    - Needle

    I have a Technics turntable with a Shure cartridge and needle that probably cost the equivalent of $2,000 today. I couldn't find needles for the cartridges for years (although I can now) but now that I have replaced most of my collection with CDs,

    I haven't brought it out of the (orginal) box for a few years now.

    The irony is, I can't sell it to anybody because it isn't "modern technology".