Slashdot Mirror


Apple Launches MacBook 2016 With Intel Skylake Processor, Longer Battery Life

Apple, on Tuesday, announced a refresh for its 12-inch MacBook laptop. The 2016 MacBook comes with an Intel Skylake processor -- sixth-generation dual-core Intel Core M model, offering up to 1.3 GHz clock speed with Turbo Boost speeds of up to 3.1 GHz, faster 1866 MHz memory, and a 'rose gold' color variant. Apple assures 10 hours of wireless Web browsing time, or 11 hours of movie playback on a single charge. The new model will hit retail stores on Wednesday. It starts at $1,299 for the 256GB SSD and 8GB (up from 4GB) version, and goes all the way up to $1,599 for the top-of-the-line model which offers 512GB SSD.

A couple of points: the first-generation MacBook didn't fare well with reviewers and plenty of users alike. Second, today's announcement also hints that the MacBook Air and the MacBook Pro lineups won't be getting the Intel Skylake upgrade for at least a few more months -- which is really sad, because, at present, they come equipped with almost three-year-old processor and graphics chips. No wonder, Oculus executive made fun of Apple's computers.

179 comments

  1. Frist POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a Mac so it must suck!!!!

    1. Re:Frist POS by Eloking · · Score: 1

      Its a Mac so it must suck!!!!

      And how does this "Apple hate" developed in a nerd community like /. ?

      You think we just don't like the art of the logo?

      --
      Elok
    2. Re:Frist POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does this "Apple hate" developed in a nerd community like /. ?

      It's the union of two reactions.
      One faction of anti-Apple are the pragmatists who can respect the UI, but look at any given Apple product 4 months after its release and consider it vastly overpriced for the hardware. Apple fanatics either insist there is a reason for that markup, or counter with claims of "it was a good price when the product was new, just never buy an Apple after the release date."
      The other faction are the fanboys. What they're fanboys of only matters in so far as they are not fanboys of Apple. To a fanboy, everything sucks except their favorite toy.

      There may be more, but those seem to be the big two.

    3. Re:Frist POS by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      It comes from a long line of Nerd hate.
      Back in the 1980's the good old IBM vs Apple debate. Then it moved to a command line vs GUI debate.
      by 1990's With Windows becoming the dominate "OS" Windows 3.1 was more of an advance shell for DOS, and the inclusion of a large range of PC Compatibles it morphed further to General Purpose PC's vs. Apple.
      During these geek wars for the past generation, had diminished Apple.
      Then during the late 1990's Apple switch to "Cute" with the Fruit Colored iMac. And the Powerbook. Which were popular enough to get a few converts. But the geek debates were much less than as the PC was still the victor. However you got the Linux fanboys joining up with the Apple Fanboys as Microsoft was the common enemy, giving Apple a bit of an edge, and impression of the underdog outsider.

      Then there was the iPod, which was popular. That allowed people to get interested in Macs again. so during the 00's Macs were getting popular with Microsoft messing up with major security problems with Windows XP and failures like ME. A lot of the people switched to Macs to avoid being boring PC guys. But this caused the hate wars to begin again. As apple is now becoming a major player on the block. No longer the underdog, but a major influencing threat. The Linux allies broke off and started to side more with Microsoft on the grounds that you can get more versatile hardware.

      Then Apple changed the game with the iPhone. Which spawned tablets and other touch devices. Which diminished the popularity of Personal Computers in general. So the war moved mostly to Apple vs Android, however interests in Macbooks vs PC's have diminished. But in terms of Hardware manufacture Apple is the big name, and who do we have as a popular PC manufacturer? No longer IBM, Compaq, Gateway, and Dell. Lenovo Thinkpads keeps the business market. But the others not so much, as the big name.
      So the underdog PC's are now getting Apple hate.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Frist POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inclusion of some unix underpinnings in OSX went a long way to convert a lot of developers/programs, who in turn influenced their friends/family/co-workers to get a Mac.

      That could well be why Windows 10 is getting bash and some ability to run Linux apps.

    5. Re:Frist POS by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

      This is just a bunch of touchy feely "what were my friends doing" zeitgeist.

      What is true is that people were learning Linux or BSD (because reasons), found that it was great, and Mac OS X was becoming a better "desktop *NIX" faster than Linux was. Not because they were afraid of being "boring PC guys." Not everybody felt this way, but practically speaking, UNIX underpinnings helped sway pragmatists.

      Nobody needs to side with Microsoft to get "more versatile hardware." Just go back to Linux.

    6. Re:Frist POS by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      Funny thing - I went primarily Mac for my home user boxes because it was 1) an actual *nix (well, literally a certified UNIX variant), and 2) it could run all the CG/gfx app suites that I wanted it to run.

      I never really got into the flamewars except for the occasional poking of fun at whatever side needed poking. For years on end, I happily ran a Mac Cube, the later a monster PowerMac on one big KVM switch with all my 'doze and Linux machinery.

      I will say this, though: While I was re-installing Linux every year because I wanted to (distro-hopping), and reinstalling 'doze every 6-12 months on the PCs because I had to (Winrot)? I upgraded the Cube once in its 6 year lifespan, and the PowerMac once in its 9-year lifespan... both times only because I wanted the features that came with the upgrades. Now I just plop in the OS upgrade on my MacBook Pro, but have only had to re-install once - when I replaced the factory platter drive with a way faster SSD drive. The OS simply holds up at least as well as Linux over the long term.

      As a fun side benefit, the MacBook Pros put up with my abuses just fine (my current one is nearly 3 years old), whereas before 2013 I was buying new laptops damned near every 12-18 months, with most of them dying off at the hardware level by month 13-14.

      Overall though, I can happily use Macs and Linux side-by-side. Windows I only use when I have no choice in the matter (I use a Mac at work, BTW).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re:Frist POS by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      A few details that get lost is that shortly before the iPod, Apple began to transition their OS from Mac OS to OS X which is based on BSD. Later Apple switched from Power to Intel. Both moves have done a lot to bring in some geeks. There are still those that don't know or refuse to accept that a Mac these days is basically an Intel Unix box.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    8. Re:Frist POS by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Later Apple switched from PowerPC to Intel.

      FTFY.

    9. Re:Frist POS by MatthiasF · · Score: 1

      Let's be fair, most Apple sales are not because their products are better or more advanced, but because the average consumer doesn't like to think.

      The iPod won because it looked simple. It wasn't that much easier to use than it's competitors and it had far less features, but it literally looked simpler because of less buttons.

      Again, Average consumer doesn't like to think so they go with the simple product.Same logic for iPhone.

      Macs really only still exist because Apple subsidized their spread into academia, who indoctrinated students into the platform. Apple doesn't take the platform seriously because it knows it doesn't need to compete. The people buying them do not do it because they are educated in computers but the exact opposite.

    10. Re:Frist POS by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      You think we just don't like the art of the logo?

      Bring back the rainbow apple...

    11. Re:Frist POS by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      And how does this "Apple hate" developed in a nerd community like /. ?

      Being on the same side of a controversial issue is an alternative to actually having friends.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Frist POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. I've hated Apple shit since I first laid hands on a IIe back in elementary school. It was inferior to my TI99/4a.

      Because it had software?

    13. Re:Frist POS by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      The inclusion of some unix underpinnings in OSX...

      ...was the only reason I stayed with Apple considering OS 9 was dying a fast death.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
  2. Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If Apple cut their outlandish prices for their mediocre products by 50% or more I might consider buying one. I was almost sold on a Mac Mini until I found out that you cannot upgrade the RAM in the newer models.

    Apple, you suck.

    1. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this at -1? It's a legitimate criticism of Apple. I bought an old Macbook on Ebay and was able to upgrade to 8 GM of RAM and a 500 GB SSD. Not a bad deal for a total of around $450 over a year ago. I don't like the idea that components that should be upgradeable are soldered in place on newer Macbooks. First, it was the battery that couldn't easily be replaced. Now it's just about everything else that can't easily be upgraded. I really like my two old Macbooks, my iPad, and my iPhone 6S Plus, but it'll be hard to sell me on a new Macbook if I can't upgrade it. That's especially true when the hardware lags behind what's in less expensive systems from other vendors.

    2. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was almost sold on a Mac Mini until I found out that you cannot upgrade the RAM in the newer models.

      You can't upgrade a Mac Mini because it's already the best. Next year when Apple comes out with a Mac Mini "S", you buy that and discard your old one. That's how you upgrade. Get with the program!.

    3. Re:Price Point by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was almost sold on a Mac Mini until I found out that you cannot upgrade the RAM in the newer models.

      Buy and upgrade an older model from OWC.

      http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Apple_Systems/Used/Macs_and_Tablets

    4. Re:Price Point by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Reading the press release sets a few alarm bells off. Seems to have only one USB-C port again. They say it is fanless and has no vents, for entirely passive cooling... Which means lots of throttling.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this at -1?

      That's a question I find myself asking a lot here at Slashdot these days. I have to browse at -1 constantly because so many good comments get modded down unjustifiably. It's not just GNAA or "BSD is dying" comments, either. We often find perfectly reasonable, relevant, on-topic, insightful and informative comments at -1.

      Having to always browse at -1 just to see good comments totally defeats the purpose of the moderation system. And clearly the metamod system isn't working, since this bad modding keeps happening.

    6. Re:Price Point by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or just get an Intel NUC or one of the many other, cheaper, better and smaller units.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Price Point by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Or just get an Intel NUC or one of the many other, cheaper, better and smaller units.

      Do they run Mac OS X?

    8. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why is this at -1?

      Because Zionists.

    9. Re: Price Point by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      We often find perfectly reasonable, relevant, on-topic, insightful and informative comments at -1.

      Tell me about it; my comments that get down-modded are always reasonable... j/k; I'm almost certainly one of the biggest assholes on this site - but hey, I try! ;)

    10. Re: Price Point by Type44Q · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't believe they're crippled in that fashion.

      /ducks

    11. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They certainly can. It's mostly a matter of selecting a compatible 802.11/Bluetooth card. Everything else you might stick in one is already on the OSX HCL. The processes for making a NUCintosh are pretty well documented and easy to find.

    12. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading the press release sets a few alarm bells off. Seems to have only one USB-C port again. They say it is fanless and has no vents, for entirely passive cooling... Which means lots of throttling.

      The previous Core M throttled a lot but I've been led to believe by reviews of non-Apple Skylake Core M processors that this one should throttle significantly less. Performance should be better. This is the model (Skylake) I've been waiting on.

    13. Re:Price Point by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They can run Mac OS X if you want.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can say that about almost every one of Apple's main computer products these days. The older gear is better. The only notable benefit of their recent iMac, Mini, and laptop offerings is that they are smaller. Upgradability is less, maintenance (getting into them to fix or replace things) is more difficult, they've cheaped out on sub-2GHz CPUs at the low (affordable) end while keeping the prices roughly the same, and removed the discrete graphics in all but the highest-end machines. The new hyper-thin MacBook keyboards are ... crap. One USB-C port? Insane. Heck, I'd pay more for a "thick" laptop like the MacBook Pros of old with an even larger battery and the simple blessing of having screws to open it instead of glue to unstick.

      I knew that Apple products were more expensive on average, but usually you got what you paid for. Their laptops, for example, lasted me for years more than a typical Windows machine. I still use one as my main machine now (upgraded with a bigger SSD and more RAM = years more use). But in the last couple of years Apple is slowly but surely losing it. They're just too expensive for what you get most of the time, and some of the cosmetic design decisions (e.g., thinness) come at too high a cost in terms of practicality. As much as I like the older hardware I own and still use regularly, I can't see getting any of the newer machines unless they suddenly reverse the trends of the last few years.

    15. Re:Price Point by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      They're just too expensive for what you get most of the time, and some of the cosmetic design decisions (e.g., thinness) come at too high a cost in terms of practicality.

      That's why I don't ever want to see an Apple Car. It'll cost too much and be too thin.

    16. Re:Price Point by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Not legally in most places, which isn't a big deal if it's a box for use at home, but if you're using it for a business it opens you up to potential liability.

      That aside, I recall building a hackintosh used to require fairly specific hardware, but I haven't followed those types of projects for years now. Is there generally better support for commodity hardware now or is it still a matter of carefully selecting parts to avoid strange behavior or other issues?

      Further, unless you're doing it just to do it, why not just run Linux instead of OS X? Most of the people I know who either bought or were interested in a Mac Mini at any point wanted it for an HTPC or something similar. Linux has gotten good enough at that role over the years so I'm at a loss for why most people would even want to run Mac OS X on a PC outside of "because I can" reasons.

    17. Re:Price Point by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The main thing with hardware is to use an Intel chipset and CPU. Beyond that Mac OS supports ATI and Nvidia graphics cards (as well as the built in Intel GPU), various sound cards and on-board sound etc.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I had to learn the hard way to avoid the primary "sacred cows" here. Soon after setting up my first user ID here, I expressed some sort of negative opinion about Richard Stallman (the most sacred of all cows here) and the karma of that user ID became so damaged as a result that I had to start over with a new one. The sad part is that I was expressing my honest opinion, not trying to cause any trouble. (Isn't that what comments are for...?)

      Lesson learned: folks here are all in favor of "free as in software" but not "free as in speech". I now use AC whenever I post my contrary opinions about Stallman or any of the other dogma here, e.g. Snowden (dogma: good), NSA (dogma: evil), Microsoft (dogma: evil), Linux (dogma: better than Windows), etc.

      BTW, wouldn't it be nice if they renamed the "Troll" rating to "Violates Dogma?'

    19. Re:Price Point by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Not legally in most places,

      Has it been confirmed by a single court that Apple can legally restrict what I can do with the software I purchased from them?
      My understanding was that the User Agreement was moot.

    20. Re:Price Point by un1nsp1red · · Score: 1

      I'm worried about this upgrade path myself. I've got a Macbook Pro that's probably 5-6 years old. Upgraded the RAM and swapped the HDD for a SSD. Still runs like butter, but it won't last forever.

      I don't understand why phones kept getting bigger and laptops keep getting smaller. My Macbook is a 15" and I can't imagine going any smaller and still being able to do the things I need to do. I already have to squint and put my face two inches from the screen to read any text on an RDP session.

    21. Re:Price Point by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Apple car an thin death trap that is dealer maintenance only (even tries and oil) at apple prices.

    22. Re:Price Point by PIBM · · Score: 1

      The fastest CPU available in those is still slower than an 6.5 years old i5-750.. I hope they will at least get the macbook pro right with a good gpu this time around :\

    23. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see that my post above got marked down to -1. I guess that's what I get for expressing my honest opinion here again. ;-)

      Your vote for self-censorship has been duly noted by this citizen of Slashdot. So, I shall continue to be very careful not to violate any of your sacred cows under my normal user ID. I hope you continue to enjoy my self-censorship here, which has earned me an "Excellent" rating. As a wise man once said, "In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve." If only you folks valued free expression as much as you value this strange concept of "free software..."

    24. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me a quad-core NUC.

    25. Re:Price Point by slaker · · Score: 1

      We had a thread about them a month ago, but here you go.

      My feeling is that thing is going to spend a lot of time throttling because of poor thermal design since that's what the i3 and i5 NUCs have done throughout their history, but that thing is a legitimate quad-core machine.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    26. Re:Price Point by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I have a NUC that I use to run OpenELEC. It freezes occasionally, and a couple of times a month the fan(s) escalate to full speed making a lot of noise, requiring a power cycle. I have yet to get the onboard IR to work. For the $400-$500 or whatever I paid for it, I'm less than impressed. At some point, just buy a unit with however much RAM you'll need vs. whining about not being able to update it yourself. I find that those arguments are usually more about ego than RAM, and if Apple's markup compared to low-end open-market commodity RAM is a hardship, you most likely shouldn't be buying this sort of computer anyway.

  3. Apple fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    And watch the Apple fanbois try to justify the ridiculously overpriced outdated hardware in Macbooks. It's a shame because OS X really is a solid operating system, but the hardware in every Apple product lags well behind their competitors. All the Apple fanbois will stand in line for hours at the nearest Apple store while those of us who care about getting work done will use something else. Can we please stop worshiping Apple does? They haven't done any real innovation at least ten years. If you want good marketing and hype, go with Apple. If you want to get work done, choose something else.

    1. Re:Apple fanbois by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And watch the Apple fanbois try to justify the ridiculously overpriced outdated hardware in Macbooks.
      You are very very wrong.
      First of all, I'm not a "fanboi"
      Secondly I have no idea if this Mac is overpriced.
      Thirdly I have absolutely no clue what a "similar" specced PC would cost.
      Fourth I don't care what a similar specced PC/Laptop will cost because that one would not run Mac OS X. At least not legally.
      Five I have nothing to justify. Why would I have?

      You buy for your gods sake what you want to buy.
      And please leave me my freedom to buy what I want for what reason I want for what price I want.

      If you guaranty that it works, and the upgrades work you can offer me a superior Hackingtosh, I don't care for the Apple Logo.

      But I don't spend 1 day googleing and 5 hours working to by a cheap Laptop to install Mac OS X myself. I rather have the real thing and spent those 29 hours earning money with it.

      Not to mention that such a cheap laptop probably would break mechanically a day after warranty runs out. My 11" (or is it 12") Mac Book Pro from 2005 with Mac OS X 10.4 just runs fine. It is 11 years old ... Show me a PC OS (except Linux or Solaris) and a "PC Laptop" that would run fine after 11 years.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Apple fanbois by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As much as I enjoy mocking Apple, I have to say that my desktop PC at home is running a Intel i7-2600K which first showed up in 2011, so is five years old now (well, 4.5, it was released around October IIRC). It's still very competitive and runs modern games and apps just fine. The Skylake equivalent is only about 5-15% faster for most tasks.

      That CPU was a great purchase with hindsight. It's more than justified its high price. More luck than skill of course.

      So anyway, I can't really mock Apple in this instance. Their hardware still sucks for many other reasons though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re: Apple fanbois by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Intel performance gains since Sandy Bridge have been lousy since AMD just isn't all that competitive.

    4. Re: Apple fanbois by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And please leave me my freedom to buy what I want for what reason I want for what price I want.

      Take a deep breath. Now let it out slowly and repeat after me: "Everything's going to be okay. No one's going to prevent me from spending as much as I want on a laptop."

      Now don't you just feel better!

    5. Re:Apple fanbois by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You have to shoot toughbooks so you can justify getting a new one.*

      But they make macs look cheap. You get what you pay for, at best, you can also pay for BS.

      * Truth is I've been shooting old computer hardware for decades. It was the 'only thing to do' with old hard drives containing Netmare 2. Got to be a habit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re: Apple fanbois by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

      They have been RAM bandwidth constrained for a _long_ time.

      Don't buy new motherboards because of a new CPU family. Buy new motherboards because of new RAM, which usually comes with a new chipset. If the chipset/CPU doesn't do anything for the RAM bandwidth, skip the upgrade.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re: Apple fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel has been concentrating on reducing power consumption, something that isn't all that important on a (larger-than-ITX, probably) desktop PC, but that's actually kind of wonderful, because the folks who bought Core i systems over the last six years haven't really had a reason to upgrade. It's been a welcome break from the new hardware treadmill.

    8. Re: Apple fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel has been concentrating on reducing power consumption, something that isn't all that important on a (larger-than-ITX, probably) desktop PC, but that's actually kind of wonderful, because the folks who bought Core i systems over the last six years haven't really had a reason to upgrade. It's been a welcome break from the new hardware treadmill.

      Intel has been both reducing power consumption and increasing performance at a steady pace. What has changed is that the lower power chips come out first, the high performance desktop chips come out later. It used to be the other way around. That's what the market wants.

    9. Re:Apple fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      name the reasons, please? point to comparable alternatives? the way I see it, the only annoying trend is toward less user-expandability, but in return for smaller, thinner but solid form factors, and longer battery life, which is what the market wants... and anyway there are products from OWC and iFixit to get around it if necessary.

    10. Re: Apple fanbois by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

      DDR4 isn't much better than DDR3 other than clocks. DDR is really reaching the end of its capabilities from my point of view. Once they start stacking RAM on chip or using optic instead of electronic buses, things will improve a lot.

    11. Re: Apple fanbois by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Most improvements are of the nature of parallel RAM pipes in the chipset. Clock improvements count too.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. Get ready to empty your wallet again... by os-pc.com · · Score: 0

    Another increment in technology, overpriced to get as much out of the less technical as possible...smh

    1. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up and take my money!

    2. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not much of an Apple fan, but let's be fair here. At some point a company needs to refresh its product line. Just because there's been little improvement in technology really isn't Apples fault. And it's not like you have to buy a new one. Now if Apple stops releasing OSX updates for older models, then you'd have a point.

    3. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on there good man, let me just check my balance with my gold iWatch...

      Plenty there, I won't give it a second thought. I'll take a dozen of whatever they're selling.

    4. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another increment in technology, overpriced to get as much out of the less technical as possible...smh

      Are macbooks overpriced? Last time I checked (a few years ago, I admit), they weren't, at least not significantly. They were in the same ballpark as others given the the specs which of course include weight, size and some general notion of "build quality".

      Main difference is htey don't drop prices so before a refresh, they're a little overpriced for the specs relative to the competiton, but just after the refresh they're pretty decently priced.

      I don't even owna mac.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Ah, poor misunderstood Microsoft Word. It's font rendering is fine, people just don't understand what it's trying to do.

      Word defaults to rendering text so that the document on screen matches what will be printed, in other words it's What You See Is What You Get (remember that?) The problem is that many fonts are optimized so that they render differently on screen with the lines making up the characters sticking to pixel centres. That prevents fuzzy Mac-like rendering and accommodates sub-pixel rendering, but in order to have the resulting paragraph fill the correct with Word has to fudge the kerning.

      You can disable this and have Word render everything nicely at the expense of the print-out looking a little different.

      In more recent versions Word has got some new fonts that render on-screen much more closely to how they render in print, so the problem is much less noticeable unless you switch back to Ariel. In any case, the resulting print/PDF output is always as good as the font itself, the kerning issues are only on-screen.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: Get ready to empty your wallet again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol and we'd use none of that. If you want a hybrid go by a fucking surface pro. Seriously though, Apple isn't into that(yet). I hope they never go that route.

    7. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      And it's absolutely Apple's fault that Intel isn't increasing the performance of their chips.

      There's people in this thread complaining that they haven't refreshed the CPUs in MacBook Pro, and at the same time bitching that there isn't a large delta of performance between this MacBook and the last one. What is Apple supposed to do when their supplier doesn't deliver components that compel an upgrade? Should they release a new version or not?

      Short version: people are just bitching because Apple. Apple is doing nothing here that Lenovo, HP, and Dell haven't already done; for some reason Lenovo, HP, and Dell get a pass on it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    8. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      The Macbook Air is reasonably priced compared to other ultralight laptops if you take resell value into account.

      The same goes for the macbook Pro. If you compare it to the Dell XPS 13/15 and do some math on the resell value (assuming you sell it after 3-5 years) then the Dell is only a couple of hundred bucks cheaper.

      The new Macbook is reasonably priced only if you desperately want a beautiful, lightweight, laptop for casual use and you have enough money that you think $800 and $1600 is the same amount of money to a first approximation...

      You can get two ultralight Asus laptops for the price of one Macbook.

    9. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You can get two ultralight Asus laptops for the price of one Macbook.

      Last time I was in the market, when the UX21 was current, the UX21 and 11" air were about the same price, but the UX21 had a larger SSD. Hardly 2 for 1.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the touchscreen? Where's more biometric security (retinal scan, fingerprint scanner)? NFC for easy device pairing? Display hinge that's not just your standard 70 degree (rotate around or even flip backwards tent-style? Multiple colour lights for the logo / keyboard for user customization?

      Where they belong - on notebooks desperately trying to reach the sales numbers Apple notebooks achieve.

    11. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, poor misunderstood Microsoft Word. It's font rendering is fine, people just don't understand what it's trying to do.

      Word defaults to rendering text so that the document on screen matches what will be printed, in other words it's What You See Is What You Get (remember that?)

      No, the problem with Microsoft Word is exactly that it doesn't do that - else you would need a print-preview mode. Epic analogy fail.

    12. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this will be resolved with monitor technology; my 24" 4k is already about 150dpi, an 8k should get us close enough (I print at 600dpi, but 300 to 600 can't affect kerning that much, can it?).

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    13. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get two ultralight Asus laptops for the price of one Macbook.

      Last time I was in the market, when the UX21 was current, the UX21 and 11" air were about the same price, but the UX21 had a larger SSD. Hardly 2 for 1.

      Perhaps the ASUS ZenBook UX305FA for $600 (on microsoftstore.com)?

    14. Re:Get ready to empty your wallet again... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      That plus being able to run a decent desktop OS. Sometimes prices do drop a bit before refreshes; this is at times reported on MacRumors. MacMall sells NIB previous-gen units at attractive prices; for someone who doesn't need the extra 10% of CPU that a refresh brings, it can be an economical way to get larger RAM and SSD complements. I suspect Apple uses them as a liquidator.

  5. Turbo-Boost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have a physical "Turbo" button I can press? If not, I'm not interested.

    1. Re:Turbo-Boost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it have a physical "Turbo" button I can press? If not, I'm not interested.

      It's called the "power button" - you press it and it goes notably faster than when turned off.

  6. It's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's $1299 for $499 worth of hardware, and you can't upgrade or replace any of it when it breaks, but people worry about that the other models will have a three-year-old CPU for a few more months, as if the computer is somehow totally unusable.

    1. Re:It's funny by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      $499 of hardware? The list price of the processors is $281 - that doesn't leave much for the motherboard, screen, ram and SSD.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:It's funny by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      it's $1299 for $499 worth of hardware, and you can't upgrade or replace any of it when it breaks,

      While you might have a legitimate complaint that Apple prices are high, you do realize that this is a laptop right? Most laptops do not have replaceable/upgrade-able parts these days. Can you upgrade the GPU on many laptops? Not unless you replace the whole MB.

      but people worry about that the other models will have a three-year-old CPU for a few more months, as if the computer is somehow totally unusable.

      Not understanding what you're saying here. Why are people worried about older models with older CPUs that they'll be able to buy still from Apple?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  7. Re:More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wi-fi eats battery life as well. Don't need wi-fi to play video files off the hard drive but you do need it to web browse.

  8. Re:More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be, because pretty much all CPUs these days have dedicated hardware for rendering videos that takes near 0 power. That, and because many web pages are far from the "few static lines of text" you make them out to be. Web pages will cause javascript to get interpretted, which is a horrible CPU hog. Playing h264 is not a horrible CPU hog, so yeh... it's actually entirely expected that it can play more video than it can view web pages.

  9. more ports, please by j2.718ff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just a single USB-C port. While I like the magsafe charging connection of older macboks, I can support charging via USB-C - the more devices that can charge via the same standard connector, the better. While I like having the USB-A plugs, I'm willing to bet peripherals will transition with time to USB-C, and I can even deal with needing a dongle until that happens. What I find unacceptable is the fact that there is only a single USB-C port.

    This makes me think of the early days of USB -- it was assumed people would chin their devices, as was common with SCSI. But then, peripheral manufacturers stopped including the pass-through connector. At first, this was annoying, but the fact is, it would be annoying to have to disassemble a chain of devices because you want to remove one from the middle.

    1. Re:more ports, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB C costs almost double in parts and the engineering is much harder. I doubt it will be that quick of an adoption until there is a good cheap recipe like the FTDI chips.

    2. Re:more ports, please by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      This makes me think of the early days of USB -- it was assumed people would chin their devices, as was common with SCSI.

      Really? It reminds me more of the early days of IEEE1394. Practically no USB devices but keyboards ever had hubs built in. Firewire hard drives did follow the arc you describe, however.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:more ports, please by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      I agree it was far more common with firewire, although monitors would be another one that often did include a hub. They went and stuck card readers in them, along with extra USB ports. Some even let you control brightness/contrast and other settings via USB.

      Chaining also made sense with firewire, as devices were not all slaved to the host like with USB.

      --

      jh

    4. Re:more ports, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an awful lot of monitors with USB hubs as well.

    5. Re:more ports, please by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I have an awful lot of monitors with USB hubs as well.

      I have never ever got on well with those things. I don't want a bunch of wires hanging from my monitor.
      My USB hubs live below the level of the desktop where they belong.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:more ports, please by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      A Hub in a monitor is useful for stuff such as keyboard and mouse. You already have at least 1 power cord and 1 video cable going to your monitor. Adding 3 USB cables won't change the usability. It's much better than requiring another box (USB hub) with one more power cord.

    7. Re:more ports, please by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      On my desktop system at home, the video cable and power cord snake through the stand and down behind the table unseen. The USB ports are off to the right of the monitor where the cables would be hanging in mid air. I went wireless and keyboard/mouse wiring was moot.

      At work I've got 5 monitors on my desk along with gadgetry of all sorts and three power strips to plug in all the power bricks. So there's nothings to be done. I gave up making that tidy. Trying to use a wireless mouse is futile. The RF environment results in a range of about 12" for a new Logitech M525, which can get 5 feet at home. So I just glory in the impenetrable thicket of wires that occupy that rear 50% of my desk.

      A daisy chain carrying all things (power, ethernet, video, usb HIDs etc) would be an improvement. It's a shame how badly they screwed up P1394. USB-C is a start.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    8. Re:more ports, please by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      I keep wondering why USB-C power bricks aren't built as USB hubs.

  10. TonyMacX86 news. Skylake now recommended. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I jumped over to TonyMacx86.com and as of 4/12/16 they have moved the recomended CPU from Haswell/Broadwell to Skylake.
    http://www.tonymacx86.com/buil...

    For those that like to tinker and build your own Hackintoshes.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  11. Re:More battery lies by Aaden42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Video decode uses a specialized, highly optimized decoder chip, most likely part of the GPU. The silicon is designed to decode H.264 and probably the various MPEG codecs using as little power as possible. CPU usage is very low while playing video.

    Web browsing does JIT compilation of text-based script languages, initiates dozens of network connections per page load to pull in resources, and has to parse & render all of that using the general purpose CPU. That requires much higher CPU usage, and much greater power demands.

    The difference is obvious on smaller (IE less compute) devices like phones. Smart phones have been able to play video flawlessly for years, but they still generally feel slower, more jumpy than most full computers for web browsing. Video decode has a very well defined, relatively small set of operations that can be optimized in silicon. Web browsing is wide open, anything goes in terms of computation. The additional flexibility required makes silicon-based optimization much more difficult, and power demands increase.

  12. Would be interesting to know... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    why

    the MacBook Air and the MacBook Pro lineups won't be getting the Intel Skylake upgrade for at least a few more months

    Technical or commercial reasons?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Would be interesting to know... by evileeyore · · Score: 1

      Commercial Reasons probably. They need something to show off at their June conference. I almost bought a new pro at the beginning of the year, but held off to see if i could get one with the skylake in June.

    2. Re:Would be interesting to know... by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      The whole Mac side of their business seems to be getting very little attention, which is rather sad. The current offerings were overpriced and used less than stellar hardware when they were first shipped, and mostly that was a looong time ago. Beautiful cases, but mobile grade guts with integrated graphics (or massively marked up GPU's).

      My wife has 2 macs, and I would kind of like to have one on my desk too (grew up on macs BITD), but every time I take a look at the offerings I see a bunch of machines at twice the price for half the machine.

    3. Re:Would be interesting to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both.

      Apple plays the long, long, long game with their supply chain and they probably had plenty of existing inventory. (Look how long apple kept selling the optical drive sporting non-retina MBP)

      Sure it makes them sluggish but they enjoy profit margins that are 1000% better than their competitors. - Fun fact. Despite Apple not being the biggest PC maker in terms of units sold.. They make more money at it than anyone else by a HUGE margin. Quality over quantity.

      Lenovo, Dell, HP, Microsoft. They all wish they were Apple.

    4. Re:Would be interesting to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Technical or commercial reasons?"

      Perhaps Apple is waiting for the new 16nm batch of graphics chips - AMD Polaris or NVidia Pascal, which should be available in mid-2016.
      The graphics devices currently available are using 3-year-old 28nm process.

    5. Re:Would be interesting to know... by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      The whole Mac side of their business seems to be getting very little attention, which is rather sad. The current offerings were overpriced and used less than stellar hardware when they were first shipped, and mostly that was a looong time ago. Beautiful cases, but mobile grade guts with integrated graphics (or massively marked up GPU's).

      Reasons are varied.

      1) Apple doesn't make much money off it - Apple's record is traditionally to concentrate on the money makers. The other products they don't spend much R&D on. Macs (PCs in general) sales have been slipping, and while Apple still has robust sales, they're a fraction of what they once were. See the Mac Pro and Mac Mini - traditionally two of Apple's WORST sellers. Granted, they still move a few units and a few PC vendors would love to have those kind of sales, but they still don't sell compared to an iMac or the laptop line. There is, however, a strong fan base for them so Apple can't really drop them entirely.

      2) For the vast majority of Apple purchasers, they're "good enough". We're not getting huge advances in computing that makes buying next year's model practically a necessity - a several year old Mac is still quite useful and quite supported. With the exception of the 32-bit EFI Macs, the OS support for is close to reaching 10 years (I think the old Mac El Capitan can run on is what, 7-8 years old?). In fact, I think the only big reason why I'd replace it would be because it only supported 8GB of RAM or something.

      3) Apple gets great deals from Intel, so Apple needs to see what processors Intel will release that they can use. One of the reasons why the Mac Mini's i7 is wimpy is because it will fit in the same pinout as the i5s, while the quad core i7s require a different motherboard. Since Apple doesn't want to put too much R&D in, they're going to need an entire line of processors supported for a few years that have the same socket, and depend on Intel to provide it. So a refresh using faster parts can be done by simply using the new parts in the existing design rather than having to build it from scratch.

    6. Re:Would be interesting to know... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I don't have an internal information, but when internal information has been leaked, the general answer has tended to be "it's complicated". It could be that they're planning a major redesign that will require retooling their factories, and they were more focused on that. It could be that the new chipsets don't have adequate support for some feature or port that Macs rely on. It could be that the new chips change the heat dissipation profile, requiring a redesign of the internal systems of the device. It could be that they swapped in the new chips and didn't see enough of a tangible improvement to justify screwing with their supply chain.

      I think part of the issue is that Apple has really turned the computer into more of an appliance, which is something that people had talked about for many years. For a long time, computers were coming up with faster models every year and people saw value in constant upgrades. People wanted to compare the experience of buying computers with that of buying a TV or a washing machine. Washing machines companies might come out with new models, but there was usually not anything so groundbreaking that would lead you to trash your perfectly good washing machine in favor of a new one. A lot of people felt that computers should be the same way.

      Meanwhile, the feature set of computers has stabilized, and often a computer from several years ago is sufficiently fast to do the things you'll do on a computer. The value of having a new machine is diminished. People are often buying computers more because their old one broke after the warranty ran out, or just because a new one is more cool, rather than actually needing new features that weren't available on previous models.

      Although they haven't explicitly said it, I think Apple's marketing shows that they think we've reached the state of "appliance" computing. Apple comes out with new models periodically, but is far less focused on the specifics on gigahertz or chipsets. These are the "Skylake" Macbooks, they're the "Mid 2016" Macbooks that are essentially the same design as the previous version. It's basically that Apple doesn't want you to care what chipset is in your Mac any more than you'd care what chipset is in your TV.

  13. Make fun of the slow software, not the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compute CPU power is not much more than it was 3 years back. Software can be made faster with effort; hardware not any where near as simple to get gains.

    Like Msft of old: "Yes, it's slow, but the hardware will catch up." when you know it was just sloppy coding that was the cause, and hardware was the problem like Snowden was the problem.

    Make the code better. Make the algorithms better. Don't obfuscate it (they are). Open source it. yada yada.

    Yours,
    Carl Kolchak

    1. Re:Make fun of the slow software, not the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, many software companies are locked into the "it builds, ship it" paradigm. It is far better to release a product that is nonfunctional come ship date and patch it, than it is to push back the release date so that v1.0 is a solid, relatively bug-free build.

      The competition is doing just that, so even if one company may have less buggy code, the guys who ship the inoperable junk will have the contracts and the sales just because they got -something- in customers' hands.

      This is also what people expect. People expect that a new product will be broken and useless. So, it is only hamstringing oneself to ship a clean 1.0 build.

    2. Re:Make fun of the slow software, not the hardware by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 3, Informative

      Compute CPU power is not much more than it was 3 years back.

      In some regards, that is true, in others, less so.

      Haswell to Skylake is rather pointless, but Sandy Bridge to Skylake is not, depending on what you're doing.

      The other factor is power consumption, which has been Intel's real focus.

  14. what about macbook pro by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    I'm considering upgrading my 2013 model. Should I wait a couple of months?

    1. Re:what about macbook pro by evileeyore · · Score: 1

      personally i am waiting for June to see if they update the pro line that has been stagnant for 2 years now. I actually don't own one right now but want to see if they rlease a skylake version of the pro in the next two months.

    2. Re:what about macbook pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#Mac

      That's a more trustworthy source than anybody posting here.

      Semi related: how do you make a clickable link?

    3. Re:what about macbook pro by alexhs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Semi related: how do you make a clickable link?

      Like in HTML: <a href="http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#Mac">MacRumors</a>
      Which gives:
      MacRumors
      I don't know if there's a list of "allowed HTML tags and entities" anywhere anymore. BTW, I used <quote> for quoting you.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:what about macbook pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the list of tags is still there if you reply using the non-dynamic thread view. But it would probably take me most of an hour to figure out how to do that, even if I really cared. There's still quite a few slashcode 1.0-isms lurking in this place.

    5. Re:what about macbook pro by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      Cool. I got mine awhile back strictly for music production to keep it separate from my PC for gaming and dev. I'm no fanboy but I have to admit it's a great laptop. I'm in love with time machine.

    6. Re:what about macbook pro by rthille · · Score: 1

      Yes, you very definitely should wait if you possibly can:
      http://www.macrumors.com/round...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    7. Re:what about macbook pro by rthille · · Score: 1

      Whoops, wrong link: http://buyersguide.macrumors.c...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  15. My notebook doesn't need upgrading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Which is really sad, because at present, they are running almost three-year-old processor and graphics chips."

    That's one opinion. I still love my MBRP 15" RD after 2.5 years.

    Speed is nice, but it isn't everything.

    I eventually look forward to non-proprietary power adapters and spare battery packs for USB-C.

    1. Re:My notebook doesn't need upgrading by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Mine's a late 2013 model and I'm a bit sad that it's coming to the end of its warranty period and there isn't something noticeably faster. The upgrade from the Core 2 to the Sandy Bridge i7 was a big jump (especially as I got an SSD at the same time). From Sandy Bridge to Haswell was noticeable, but not huge (though moving to the 1TB SSD meant that I didn't have to be too careful about space on the laptop). Skylake looks like another incremental jump.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:My notebook doesn't need upgrading by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      You may still love it. But would you buy it again at full price in 2016?

  16. No good for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since skylake's power management sucks with it. Wonder how macos fares?

  17. Re:More battery lies by Junta · · Score: 1

    Well the battery lifetimes are all really weird, but....

    Video playback has stayed about the same, but technology has advanced to specifically help that out a lot. When doing nothing but playing a video, a modern computer basically turns off most of itself (much like the brain of the people watching many videos).

    On the flip side, 'web browsing' means more and more javascript and css animations and such. As bad flash was/is for browsing, it's status as a plugin not guaranteed to be everywhere forced some measure of restraint. Now with the advancement of browser technologies allowing developers to completely ignore flash, the playing field is leveled and they love the shiny little things.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  18. Yeah I knwo it's a web glitch by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    But if you follow that link to Apple and click "Buy" it 404's.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  19. Say what about the first gen... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    A couple of points: the first-generation MacBook didn't fare well with reviewers and plenty of users alike.

    My 2006 Black MacBook was useful for eight years until developers followed Apple's lead and started dropping support for 32-bit programs. Never mind that it runs 32-bit Windows 10 and Mint Linux without problems. I have yet to find a true successor to this great laptop.

    1. Re:Say what about the first gen... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      They were talking about the first generation of the 'new' macbooks with the 12" screen and USBC charging connector.

    2. Re:Say what about the first gen... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      WOOOOSH!

  20. Paint drying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess their reference movie for testing battery life is this one.

  21. Re:More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you care at all about battery life, it pays to disable javascript by default when browsing the web from a laptop. It's silly, insecure, unneeded, and destroys your battery life.

  22. 12" really..... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the 15" line needs a refresh badly, and we need the return of the 17" with a 4K display.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:12" really..... by Megane · · Score: 1

      My 2011 17" is still chugging along, and it's been through a lot, including being dropped on a corner that slightly dislodged the video cable. I put in 16GB RAM years ago (try that with the 8GB soldered-RAM models they are selling now!) and only recently did the trackpad start to get flaky. Fortunately I had just picked up a first-gen unibody 15" a month before and found out about the problems with old trackpads, so I already knew about the adjustment screw.

      At least they still sell the 13" with optical drive that can presumably be upgraded to 16GB. I suspect the main reason they dropped the 17" was because a retina display that size would have been too expensive. I really don't even want a retina display anyhow.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:12" really..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 17" model was dropped because it accounted for 5% of all MBP sales and repairing them was ungodly expensive. They were a net-loss for Apple.

      My 17" model had it's logic board replaced about half a dozen times (https://www.apple.com/support/macbookpro-videoissues/) until they couldn't get replacement parts for it anymore and decided to just give me a brand new MBP 15" retina. They gave me the equivalent of what I had. 16G RAM, 1TB SSD (I had 750GB HDD), and the highest CPU they had since that was what came with the 1TB SSD stock.

      Despite the fact that people complain Apple is stupidly overpriced for what you get, they do have excellent customer service. Every time I say never again, they always do something to remind me *why* I buy apple products.

    3. Re:12" really..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And two kidneys and a mechanical pancreas.

      Ha ha

    4. Re:12" really..... by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      So you buy Apple products because you need to repair them 6 times? I can't remember a single laptop (including a lot of cheap ones) requiring more than one repair. And all of them lasted at least 3 years, often 5-7.

    5. Re:12" really..... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Those of us that really use laptops experience differntly.

      Dell, Lenovo and Toshiba. I blow them up at least once every 24 months. bad ports hinges shatter, etc... MY macbook 6 years old and still perfect.

      But then I do real work unlike most that never let their laptop leave the desk.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. Re:More battery lies by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Aside from what the other posters have said, text rendering is actually one of the most processor-intensive tasks that a typical desktop does. Each codepoint has to be converted to one or more glyphs. These glyphs are sequences of bezier curves that are rendered to raster images (which are typically cached). Next, you need some fairly complex calculations to work out the spacing between glyphs, which is starts as a fixed advance and is then subtly tweaked based on pixel alignment and shape of the next character. Now you have a set of glyph runs, but you want to render a paragraph of text, so you need to work out where to break the lines. If you're something that sucks less than MS Word, you then use a fairly simple dynamic programming algorithm to work out the place to break the lines for optimum readability, otherwise you use a greedy strategy. This is fairly easy in a rectangle, though gets more complex if there's a background. Now you know where the glyphs need to go, and all that's left is to alpha-blend them with the background (remember, antialiasing needs an alpha channel and sub-pixel AA means that each rasterised glyph will be in three colours). This last step is typically offloaded to the GPU, because the CPU hit of just that part is quite noticeable.

    And then, if it's a web page, something tweaks the DOM, or a new CSS file finishes downloading, and you need to do the whole thing again.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  24. Re: MacBook is for LUDDITES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah⦠I'm fine with new technology as long it doesn't break my workflow.

  25. Re:So soon??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they are doing a refresh. Ideally, the entire line of Macs, from the lowly Mac Mini to the Mac Pro should be all redone at the same time (WWDC), just so people have some inkling on when to buy. For example, it is well known when the iPhone is getting its facelife. Macs may not be as glitzy, but they are still a workhorse product.

    Having some models go almost three years without even a minor upgrade (such as more RAM, larger SSD, additional USB ports, etc.) is not a good thing, especially for a product that is pretty much the top of the line.

  26. Re:More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you, and everyone... this is actually the best and most informative group of replies I've ever had to a post here on /.

    There weren't even any flames, and my initial framing of the question was less-than-gracious.

  27. Re:More battery lies by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 0

    It's OK they got VW to verify their battery figures!

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  28. Re: More battery lies by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

    Actually with improved video decoders it's true. The rest of the computer will low-power mode while only the computer runs. For example, a demo Carrizo machine got something like 11hr when playing a 1080p HEVC video, while lasting nowhere near as long at general use.

  29. Re:MacBook is for LUDDITES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your appy appp app jokes aren't even clever. Come up with something funny, will ya?

    It's not even a legitimate complaint.

  30. Re:MacBook is for LUDDITES. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

    Does this get posted by script, or does someone actually bother to type it?

    Can someone explain why it is funny? I don't get it.

  31. OS X for software development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently a heavy linux user at home and was wondering if it was worthwhile to switch to OS-X for software development. I am currently using Ubuntu 14.04 and my main gripe is that it is very unpolished on my dell xps 12 - sleep/hibernate/suspend doesn't work correctly, the trackpad isn't very good and it is lacking the horsepower for the work I am trying to do.

    I will mainly be using the laptop for java and python development. I am thinking of looking into some javascript frameworks also like node. I need a macbook pro class machine for this, eclipse is already laggy with ~12 open projects in my workspace and the external monitor hooked up to the laptop scrolls in a very jerky manner.

    My main concerns with OS-X are:
    - will be just as much work making OS X more like my linux machine in terms of a good terminal emulator?
    - How about decent package management? How do fink/hombrew/pip etc compare to apt?
    - How is the python tooling?
    - Will common shortcuts like alt-tab, Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-X work in OS-X?
    - What is the state of vertical splitting of the screen between programs - for eg, vertically splitting eclipse and chrome?
    - I have heard that OS updates in OS-X break programs installed in userspace (especially those installed via package management tooks). To what extent is this true?

    I have reached a point in my life where my time is worth more than money. If it is going to take me 3-4 weekends to get OS-X to a point where it is usable for development and I feel comfortable in it, I will just stick to linux and live with the lack of polish/hardware integration issues - maybe buy another Dell.

    Anyways, hope developers with OS-X and Linux experience can share their experiences.

    1. Re:OS X for software development by Megane · · Score: 2

      Will common shortcuts like alt-tab, Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-X work in OS-X?

      Alt-tab was from Windows (but OS X has had it for over a decade), and how the hell do you not know that the Z/X/C/V for text editing came from the original 1984 Macintosh? It only got changed to use ctrl because Microsoft couldn't force computer manufacturers to add a command key to the keyboard. (They clearly got more powerful since then, as you can see from modern PC keyboards.) Just be thankful you don't have to use the original 3-button X Windows copy/paste!

      I haven't cared much about the package management stuff in a while, but Fink is long dead, I think the current one is macports. And I don't know about what you've "heard" about breaking programs, but any OS can have DLL hell, even Linux. Maybe that's why Linux package managers are so good, because they have to be. The newer versions of OS X try to lock down the core OS, which can cause problems for some things, but it is well documented how turn that protection off. (Spoiler: you have to reboot in a special way first)

      You could always try to find a cheap old unibody Macbook Pro laptop (be warned about trackpad click problems, they can be fixed if you know what to adjust, but you should research it first) and try it out. It might be better to get a cheap "learner" one before you go full into it. Or if you can get a good deal on a 2011 (pre-retina) model with an i7 in it, that might be as good for software development as a brand new one, plus you can easily upgrade to 16GB RAM. I'm still using my 2011 17" i7 and I'm a bit surprised that five years later it's still far from obsolete.

      But no matter what you do, you'll always be lost for a few months when switching to a new OS until you get used to it. I only recently upgraded to 10.9 (OpenGL improvements motivated me) and that was essentially the same OS. On PCs, I'm still using Windows 7.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:OS X for software development by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      - will be just as much work making OS X more like my linux machine in terms of a good terminal emulator?

      Yes. I can't believe how crappy is the default OS X shell/terminal compared to a standard Ubuntu install.
      Coreutils suck, lack many useful options of the GNU variants used in Linux. You have bash, but without bash-completion (not to be confused with plain old tab-completion) it feels like you are stuck with a Linux distro from the 90s.

      - How about decent package management? How do fink/hombrew/pip etc compare to apt?

      It sucks a lot more. A lot less integrated with the system, packages are more buggy, less maintained. They also often duplicate packages already provided by the OS.

      - Will common shortcuts like alt-tab, Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-X work in OS-X?

      No, most of them are different. You need a special keyboard with an Apple key.

    3. Re:OS X for software development by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Alt-tab was from Windows (but OS X has had it for over a decade), and how the hell do you not know that the Command-Z/X/C/V for text editing came from the original 1984 Macintosh? It only got changed to use Ctrl because Microsoft was too stupid to use the Alt key for Command (which is in the proper location), and used Alt for other keyboard functionality.

      FTFY.

    4. Re:OS X for software development by tibit · · Score: 1

      - OS X's terminal is perfectly usable. Default shortcuts are funky, but you'll get used to them.
      - macports is what you should be using. I like it more than the RPM I've been using since RedHat 2 (not RHEL 2, mind you).
      - very good in macports, OS X comes with some older python version preinstalled, though
      - Cmd-Tab, Cmd-C, Cmd-V, Cmd-X all work :)
      - bettersnaptool handles all that, but of course you can arrange your windows whatever way you wish
      - minor (n.n.x) version updates don't do that, major version updates (n.x) keep your installed packages usually working, but if you wish to do any package changes (updates etc.) it's best to reinstall macports, but it's very easy to do

      I don't think it'll take you longer than 2 days to get used to it, as long as you read the basic keyboard shortcuts, OS X user guide, the user guide for the hardware you'll be using (e.g. iMac essentials, and google for stuff you don't know.

      One more thing: to use the compiler, you need to install xcode, then from terminal run sudo gcc to accept the license. From that point on the command-line build environment is usable and you can then install macports, build your own code, etc.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    5. Re:OS X for software development by tibit · · Score: 1

      I know that Apple could do better, but nobody serious uses whatever is bundled with OS X when it comes to gnuland. Macports is where it's at, and the first thing you do after installing macports is sudo port followed by selfupdate and install coreutils. Then close & reopen the terminal tab, and you're up and running.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re: OS X for software development by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      iTerm2 is exactly what you want.

    7. Re:OS X for software development by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      - will be just as much work making OS X more like my linux machine in terms of a good terminal emulator?

      That depends on

      - How about decent package management? How do fink/hombrew/pip etc compare to apt?

      It's a whole different game. Brew is currently the best among them. You should view it as a way to install a couple (or dozens) of additional tools, while in Linux it's basically almost the way the OS is put together.

      - How is the python tooling?

      It does depend on how you use it. On my Linux boxes, I never uses pip, and always search through apt for the library in question. That won't work under OS X. However if you use pip, which basically is independent of the OS, then you won't encounter difficulties.

      - Will common shortcuts like alt-tab, Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-X work in OS-X?

      On OS X, you'll have to use the CMD key which is located where the Alt-key normally is. Alt-tab thus normally works.

      - What is the state of vertical splitting of the screen between programs - for eg, vertically splitting eclipse and chrome?

      There are tools for this, but they're all clunky. Using virtual desktops works great, though.

      - I have heard that OS updates in OS-X break programs installed in userspace (especially those installed via package management tooks). To what extent is this true?

      I've had something like that once. But it was quickly fixed by Homebrew.

      If it is going to take me 3-4 weekends to get OS-X to a point where it is usable for development and I feel comfortable in it

      Then don't start using OS X. I mean, you're moving to a new OS -- that's not nothing. I found it great fun, though.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    8. Re:OS X for software development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am currently a heavy linux user [...]
      - Will common shortcuts like alt-tab, Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, Ctrl-X work in OS-X?

      Are you fucking kidding me?

  32. I hope they took the time to work on drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft launched their Surface Pro / Surface Book on the freshly-minted Skylake and have had no end to their driver headaches. Their promise of 9 hours of video playback on Skylake, with its snazzy new HEVC decode core, is possible only with local content in a very select number of programs. Fire up Youtube and watch your battery choke to death on all the optimized code out there.

  33. Depends on what you are using it for by dhuv · · Score: 1

    The new version is certainly a good incremental improvement over the previous. I have been using previous model since it was first released and love it because it fits my needs.

    - I do wish Apple provided the multi port adapter with the laptop. I rarely use it but have to have one around just in case (USB-A and HDMI)
    - Now that they provide a USB-C to lightning cable, I can use the same charger for my phone and laptop. They should have the option to get these with new phones.

    The changes in the new version does not justify an upgrade for me. I usually keep my laptops for around 4 years. I do wish they had a batter replacement program.

    1. Re:Depends on what you are using it for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could do this before. You can charge your phone with the $19 USB-C to USB-A adapter, plus the USB-C Macbook Charger brick and the old USB-A to Lightning cable. The other Apple USB-C adapters, with the external display port, won't work, but the simple one lets you charge USB-A stuff off the USB-C brick just fine.

    2. Re:Depends on what you are using it for by jfelix1010 · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm mistaken, I'm pretty user that they have battery replacement program for the 12-inch macbook.

    3. Re:Depends on what you are using it for by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      it's every easier, you can just use a C to C cable and charge one Macbook from another, which means perpetual energy.

    4. Re:Depends on what you are using it for by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      - I do wish Apple provided the multi port adapter with the laptop. I rarely use it but have to have one around just in case (USB-A and HDMI)

      Or even better, they could include a USB A and HDMI port on the laptop. That would be revolutionary. I wonder why nobody had this idea before.

      - Now that they provide a USB-C to lightning cable, I can use the same charger for my phone and laptop. They should have the option to get these with new phones.

      Or you know, they could just use USB-C on phones instead of useless proprietary ports. It would be nice if phones with standard ports existed.

    5. Re:Depends on what you are using it for by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Brilliant ideas both! Get this man into product management STAT!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:Depends on what you are using it for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - I do wish Apple provided the multi port adapter with the laptop. I rarely use it but have to have one around just in case (USB-A and HDMI)

      Or even better, they could include a USB A and HDMI port on the laptop. That would be revolutionary. I wonder why nobody had this idea before.

      Yeah, and while we're at it, throw in some Centronics port in too. Never can have to few ports on a laptop.

  34. Re:MacBook is for LUDDITES. by Maritz · · Score: 1

    It's only funny to the gimp who writes it. I assume. Even then, he/she would promptly stop if they thought it wasn't annoying anyone.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  35. Re:More battery lies by jedidiah · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but this is a Mac and Mac users we're talking about here. They're all about the cloud and iTunes and if you actually own large amounts of local media, you will be labeled a pirate.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  36. Re:More battery lies by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Since the majority of the American public now plays video games I suspect that the most processor-intensive task performed by the typical desktop, by a wide margin, is some part of video gaming. Since the majority of graphics processing seems to happen on the GPU now, I would presume that to be physics simulations, but I'm honestly not sure. It's clear that it's not font rendering, though. I can websurf without my CPU even bothering to clock up, and more to the point, we had rendering of kerned outline fonts on computers that operated at MHz speeds. And I don't just mean towards the end of that era, I mean for example on a Macintosh IIci. Even fully anti-aliased and kerned text could be rendered on that platform almost as fast as you could do anything with it. We're talking 25 MHz 68030 here. By the time we did get up into the hundreds of MHz, you really could render it as fast as you could mess with it; the transformations would be done by the CPU, but the actual drawing operations were already being offloaded to graphics cards, well before they even had 3D acceleration.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  37. Marble Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Oculus rant started with Marble Madness being the worst game he owned. I stopped reading after that. Maybe it wasn't a 3D VR super HD real life game, but it was still pretty fun.

  38. Re: More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me a pirate then, Apple user since 2000. I have about 2 weeks playtime on my playlist. Not including other albums. No cloud either. Disabled all that. I'm old school.

  39. iOS to replace OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To unify the Apple Inc. portfolio, Apple will kill OS X and all hardware lines that depend on it.

    Apple will replace OS X with iOS.

    HFS+ will also be killed off. That is not a bad thingy.

    However, in unifying around iOS, Apple will ban shells, sudo, and all command line applications. Timmy Cook and Jony Ives will penalize Apple Inc. employees and developers who use Bash and commands.

    Timmy Cook, "Thou shall NOT Bashes, U gona Luz my penis with your jucies."

    1. Re:iOS to replace OS X by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Apple will replace OS X with iOS.

      Latest rumor is that Apple will rename OS X to MacOS to be consistent with iOS, tvOS and WatchOS.

      http://www.slashgear.com/apple-further-hints-os-x-name-change-to-macos-15436420/

  40. Throwing shade by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

    No wonder, Oculus executive made fun of Apple's computers.

    They weren't even focused on the laptop platform (Since the vast majority of PC laptops can't effectively run VR), but on the mac pro, which is actually a quite powerful system - albeit not suitable for VR since it is focused as workstation platform and not a gaming one. If you're going to slight apple, at least make it generally relevant. Granted, I'm still not sold on the 12" models.

  41. Re:More battery lies by danceswithtrees · · Score: 1

    You need to send this memo out to Amazon video and Netflix. My macbook gets awfully warm when playing video from these sources. iPad stays nice and cool however. They (Amazon, Netflix, Apple) should fix this but alas, probably never will.

  42. Re:More battery lies by yuvcifjt · · Score: 0

    Except sadly, all the retarded "cool" web kids push heavily for javascript-only websites.
    And because that are "elite", so too must angular / node / mongo, to push down the gullible throats of managers.

    Sadly. it's difficult to come across a site these days that doesn't work without JS - except perhaps, public institutes.

  43. Re:MacBook is for LUDDITES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disagree, I think it's funny because it ironically casts the hipster drive to edge out everyone else in adopting the latest technology as a "luddite" backwardness - implying that by engaging in the struggle itself, one forfeits the attainment of its end goal: technological enlightenment.

  44. Re:More battery lies by yuvcifjt · · Score: 0

    Perhaps your Macbook is a little old to offload the video decoding to the GPU, especially with newer codecs?
    For example, h.264 started becoming popular around 2008/2009, with some hardware coming out to support it.
    Browsers started integrating it around 2010, along with Theora, WEBM/VP8.
    And Intel integrated an initial implementation of the decoder in their Sandybridge-based CPU's from 2011.

    But since then, there's been lots of revisions, even up to 2014, along with other video compression algorithms.

  45. 3 years old CPU by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    " they come equipped with almost three-year-old processor and graphics chips"

    That must be a joke, right? Apple computers are expensive, but at least they give you the latest technology, isn't it?

    1. Re:3 years old CPU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much point in upgrading the Air. Cooling such a tight form factor is nigh impossible, so faster, hotter CPU and GPUs are just going to get throttled. If the Skylake is more efficient, then OK.

    2. Re:3 years old CPU by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Of course new CPU is more efficient.

    3. Re:3 years old CPU by topologist · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the article submitter is smoking. According to this: http://www.everymac.com/system... the current Macbook Air has a "Core i7 (I7-5650U)" processor which per Intel's own website http://ark.intel.com/products/... debuted in Q1 2015.

    4. Re:3 years old CPU by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      " they come equipped with almost three-year-old processor and graphics chips"

      That must be a joke, right? Apple computers are expensive, but at least they give you the latest technology, isn't it?

      It's not quite that bad, but it's bad. Apple hasn't even kept up with yearly updates on the Mac side of things. The Mac book was over a year old when this came out. The Mac Book Air is 407 days since last revision. Mac Mini is getting close to two years and the Mac "Pro" is close to three years old.

    5. Re:3 years old CPU by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      Its not actually that bad, period. All Intel consumer cpus since Haswell have roughly the same cpu performance. Only power consumption and GPU performance have steadily improved since then. So frankly it isn't much of an upgrade unless your old Macbook is going dead on you from battery drain.

      If you still have an old Macbook with a HDD in it, then an easy mini-upgrade is to replace that HDD with a SSD. Poof, it will feel like new even with relatively limited ram. I did the 'ol switch-r-roo on my wife's old 5-year-old MacBook Pro, mostly for me, but the thing worked so well after the change my wife decided to keep it. Oops.

      -Matt

  46. Lame commentary by post_toastie · · Score: 1

    The Oculus Rift comment was lame. Of course a Mac notebook isn't going to have graphics up to snuff for VR. How many PC notebooks are up to the task? 2? 3 maybe? Sure, Mac desktops suck for VR, but this article isn't about those.

  47. Re:More battery lies by imgod2u · · Score: 1

    The problem is Intel's chip. They have some hardware-accelerated h.264 (and HVEC/VP9) decoding support but they prefer you use the (lower quality) Quicksync they put in silicon to do video decoding. Browsers and apps have to specifically use that when decoding and the quality difference is noticeable.

    Their newest Apollo Lake atom-based chip *finally* fully hardware-accelerates HVEC and VP9, so I think devices with those will be competitive with the iPad when it comes to video streaming. But I don't think Sky Lake does the same...

  48. Re:MacBook is for LUDDITES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This apper gets it! Just like Dot Matrix from Neowin, who apped at anyone who didn't like Windows 8 by calling them LUDDITES for refusing "innovation", but when Windows 10 removed something he liked, he whined about it non-stop, almost as if he got apped by karma!

    Apps!

  49. Re:More battery lies by tibit · · Score: 1

    What in the f*** allows you to render full motion video at screen resolution more efficiently than you can render a few static lines of text?

    Video decoding is hardware assisted and it's power-optimized to hell and back. Javascript engines can't really compete. Modern websites are, unfortunately, power hungry. It's a combination of absolutely abhorrent APIs offered by the browsers, and the cluelessness of front-end developers. Unfortunately, browser APIs exposed via javascript seem to suffer from the same lack of direction, cohesion and foresight in API design as plagues PHP.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  50. Re:More battery lies by tibit · · Score: 1

    Heck, when you watch media from an optical drive through OS X's DVD player or iTunes, it'll read-ahead several minutes worth of material and turn off the drive for that time. That also saves battery, and watching DVDs is quieter that way, too.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  51. 1866mhz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are they not using ddr4?

  52. Re:More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if somebody is like you, they call you an idiot - completely justified.

  53. Re:More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you care at all about battery life, it pays to disable javascript by default when browsing the web from a laptop. It's silly, insecure, unneeded, and destroys your battery life.

    Better yet, do all browsing with Lynx or wget.

  54. Re: More battery lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pirate

  55. The 2015 Macbook had 8GB not 4GB ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a small mistake in the original post.
    The 2015 12in Retina Macbooks ALL came with 8GB of ram not 4GB.
    The if you read the article, it was the MacBook Air line which got a bump in RAM from 4GB to 8GB.