Mitsubishi Motors Pulls a Volkswagen; Shares Drop (reuters.com)

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Mitsubishi Motors Pulls a Volkswagen; Shares Drop (reuters.com)

Posted by msmash on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @07:40AM from the car-makers-lying,-again dept.

Reader Zane C. writes: The president of Japan's sixth largest auto corporation has admitted to manipulating test data on fuel economy (mileage test data) for 625,000 total eK Wagon and eK Space models, as well as the Dayz and Dayz Roox models produced for Nissan Motors. The tests overstated fuel efficiency by 5 percent to 10 percent. The offending models have been taken off the market until the problem is fixed, and foreign markets are being investigated for similar violations. Upon the announcement of the manipulations, Mitsubishi's stock dropped 15% and it lost 1.2 billion dollars in market value. The company apologized for the deception and said that it is investigating the employees involved. According to Mitsubishi, it was Nissan's in-house testers that discovered the discrepancy between the cars' published fuel efficiency data, and their real-life results. The affected models are sold exclusively in Japan.

61 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Denial of emissions... by MobileTatsu-NJG · 2016-04-20 07:45 · Score: 5, Funny

He who articulated it, particulated it!

--

"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
lol by Type44Q · 2016-04-20 07:45 · Score: 3, Funny

Just the names of those models merits his ass stepping the hell down.
1. Re:lol by TWX · 2016-04-20 07:49 · Score: 1, Informative
  
  At least it wasn't "Starion". Given that the smaller car was "Colt", you can probably guess what the car was actually supposed to be called...
  
  --
  Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
2. Re: lol by Type44Q · 2016-04-20 07:58 · Score: 1
  
  Given that the smaller car was "Colt"
  Had an eighteen year old cousin (the first relative I ever smoked-up with) get killed in one of those little sardine tins...
3. Re: lol by Laser_iCE · 2016-04-20 08:43 · Score: 0
  
  Thanks for letting us know you smoked up with him, really added substance to an otherwise unbelievable story.
4. Re:lol by Dutch+Gun · 2016-04-20 10:17 · Score: 1
  
  The Japanese use English in very interesting ways that sound ridiculous to us.
  
  --
  Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
5. Re: lol by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 10:27 · Score: 0
  
  Maybe you don't own a calendar, or don't have any friends.
  Or both.
6. Re:lol by justthinkit · 2016-04-20 13:42 · Score: 2
  
  Japanese words that are "English sounding" are part of their Katakana syllabary. For example, "ice cream" becomes 'Ai su' 'ku ri mu' or Aisu Kurimu.
  
  Beats the heck out of English where we expect people to remember how to pronounce words like 'rendezvous' even though it only makes sense with French intonation and thus ends up yet another exception.
  
  In thinking a bit further about this, given that we no longer teach syllabic pronunciation in American public schools, and Americans are plummeting down the intelligence curve, whereas Japanese are among the smartest and certainly most well-read in the world, maybe there is merit in insisting that words fit within the "two characters per kana" systems of hiragana and katakana.
  
  --
  I come here for the love
7. Re:lol by kimvette · 2016-04-20 13:56 · Score: 1
  
  Yeah we get the joke... but it's not true. It's a portmanteau of "Star" and "Orion" and "Arion" (a mythological horse).
  
  --
  The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
8. Re:lol by arglebargle_xiv · 2016-04-20 20:28 · Score: 1
  
  Japanese words that are "English sounding" are part of their Katakana syllabary. For example, "ice cream" becomes 'Ai su' 'ku ri mu' or Aisu Kurimu.
  
  It's not Katakana syllabary, it's Katana syllabary. You take an English word, you chop it up with a Katana, and then you glue the remains back together to get the Japanese form.
They all did by hawguy · 2016-04-20 07:46 · Score: 4, Insightful

Clearly all of the manufacturers used similar tricks, that's why they didn't point the finger at VW earlier. I'm sure they all knew about it since VW had such good emissions and fuel economy that the other manufacturers must have done tests and tear downs of their own to figure out how VW did it. But no one wanted to rock the boat and invite more scrutiny from regulators.
1. Re: They all did by Type44Q · 2016-04-20 08:03 · Score: 1
  
  But no one wanted to rock the boat and invite more scrutiny from regulators.
  Benz might've had motive to; they were apparently forced to incorporate expensive "cow-piss-injection" and particulate filters..
2. Re:They all did by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · 2016-04-20 08:11 · Score: 2
  
  This. It was a reporter who "busted" the story. If people think the Big Three are gonne get out of this scott free, guess again. That's why hypergiant penalties on VW won't happen.
  
  --
  (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
3. Re:They all did by Aighearach · 2016-04-20 08:12 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  There is actually very little that is similar between this and what Volkswagen did. It is like saying that a shoplifter "pulls a Blackbeard" or something. In this case, they lied about their fuel economy to increase sales. In the other case, they sold cars with completely illegal emissions and built them to detect an emissions test and cheat on it.
  Your claim about "no one wanted to rock the boat" is horse shit. The regulators who uncovered the VW cheat have been testing other manufacturers too, and nobody else appears to be doing that thing. The reason that nobody pointed the finger at VW is that they don't all buy competitors cars and road test the emissions. They test things like comfort and performance of competitors, they don't attempt to re-create all their regulatory compliance. They spend that money on their own compliance! That testing is expensive, and they don't really benefit from it. Performance testing of competitors they do benefit from, because it is more likely to lead to engineering insights.
4. Re:They all did by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:22 · Score: 0
  
  It's completely accurate. None of them wanted to rock the boat because none of them wanted additional scrutiny. Maybe they didn't do the same things as VW, but they are all doing shady things they don't want to come to light. As a consumer, I'd be more pissed at Mitsubishi than VW. VWs cheat gave me better power, better economy and better reliability at the cost of more NOx, Mitsubishis cheated me out of money by causing me to use more fuel than advertised.
  And before you scream "Yeah, but NOx is really bad for you", true, but like all things, amount matters, and there is some solid evidence that the US levels are overly cautious, and the levels that VW was emitting is actually fine for your health. Remember, NO2 is also known as laughing gas. Something occasionally used as a general anesthetic for minor surgery. It's not a substance that "if ever exposed to even a little YOU WILL DIE!!!!!11!!!!"
5. Re:They all did by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:25 · Score: 0
  
  > Clearly all of the manufacturers used similar tricks, that's why they didn't point the finger at VW earlier.
  This is conjecture. Come back when you have data.
6. Re:They all did by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:45 · Score: 1
  
  N2O is laughing gas. NO2 is entirely not laughing gas. Learn your chemistry, you slashdotters!
7. Re:They all did by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:55 · Score: 0
  
  Twice the oxigen? That's even better!
8. Re:They all did by Tablizer · 2016-04-20 09:01 · Score: 1
  
  [Other co's in on it] This is conjecture. Come back when you have data.
  I made a similar speculation in a VW-cheat /. story about half a year ago. Here's the logic again:
  Car co's are practically obligated to study competitors' systems because a lot of engineering resources are spent on pollution control. I hear diff estimates, but roughly 1/3 to 1/2 the parts and complexity in an engine are devoted to pollution control.
  Before you spend tens or hundreds of millions implementing and/or manufacturing a system, you want to know how your competitors did it first. You'd be stupid NOT to.
  It's very unlikely that NONE of VW's competitors know about their shortcuts. You could argue that one or two competitors perhaps were clueless and lazy, skipping an obvious step, but not all of them. That's just too unlikely. The chance of all the car co's being lackadaisical on the same issue in the same way is a statistical long-shot.
  And if they knew about it, they'd either feel obligated to copy the tricks to compete, or rat on VW. Since we know they didn't rat, they probably did the first option.
  I'm sure they rolled around "what if we get caught" in their minds. Since other co's are in on it, they'd figure the competitors would be in the same boat when caught such that it would only marginally affect the company since it will hit all co's roughly equally in the longer run.
  Somebody is going to be making cars because new mass car co's cannot be started up quickly. Thus, the same co's would still be in business making about the same amount of cars even if all are punished. They'll just pass the punishment fees onto the consumer, and they can still compete doing that because all the major car co's are paying roughly the same penalty.
  It's roughly comparable to fans or rioters flooding the sports arena before the game is finished. If only a handful do it, they know they'll be fully busted. However, if hundreds or thousands do it, the chance of getting caught is low and/or the jails and courts don't have room for that many such that they'll get a lighter sentence.
  Occam's Razor is that they knew and followed suit, at least to some degree. I welcome an alternative realistic scenario to the one I offered.
  
  --
  Table-ized A.I.
9. Re:They all did by Golden_Rider · 2016-04-20 09:30 · Score: 1
  
  Clearly all of the manufacturers used similar tricks, that's why they didn't point the finger at VW earlier. I'm sure they all knew about it since VW had such good emissions and fuel economy that the other manufacturers must have done tests and tear downs of their own to figure out how VW did it. But no one wanted to rock the boat and invite more scrutiny from regulators.
  True. Ever wondered why after the whole VW scandal became known - even though it would be such an excellent thing to capitalize on - none of the other car manufacturers did any large advertising campaigns in which they said "buy our cars, we do not cheat"? This is why. Keep a low profile and nobody will take a closer look at your own cars.
10. Re:They all did by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 10:17 · Score: 0
  
  Actually, some manufacturers did. In some cases even after they were caught cheating (GM and Renault). Only VW were stupid enough to admit it and even that was mostly because they were extorted into admission by the US EPA, who threatened to withdraw approval of new models otherwise.
11. Re:They all did by EEPROMS · 2016-04-20 11:38 · Score: 1
  
  Actually Im wondering why everyone is getting upset over VW playing the software to get around emissions regulations. Emission Recall NISSAN ID: R1408 ECM REPROGRAM 2009 NISSAN ROGUE 2.5 AWD VIN: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX EFFECTIVE DATE: October 06, 2014 Summary Some high mileage vehicles may experience higher than expected exhaust gas temperatures, leading to increased tailpipe emissions. Remedy Nissan dealers will reprogram the Engine Control Modules (ECMs) of affected vehicles.
12. Re:They all did by kybred · 2016-04-20 15:26 · Score: 1
  
  Twice the oxigen? That's even better!
  No, oxygen is a component of hydrogen hydroxide of which a teacup full can cause death! And the solid form can put your eye out!
13. Re:They all did by drinkypoo · 2016-04-20 17:34 · Score: 1
  
  Clearly all of the manufacturers used similar tricks, that's why they didn't point the finger at VW earlier.
  Yes and no. The manufacturers have a long history of not badmouthing one another outside of racing, with only limited exceptions. But yes, all or at least many manufacturers have diddled the emissions systems in the past, and it would be surprising to learn that only one of them (Audi, VW etc. being one company, after all) was doing it now when the regulations are, as usual, stricter than ever.
  
  --
  "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
14. Re:They all did by BlueStrat · 2016-04-20 21:20 · Score: 1
  
  Clearly all of the manufacturers used similar tricks, that's why they didn't point the finger at VW earlier.
  The reason why those standards for diesels are so high is because US auto makers could not market a decent enough quality diesel passenger car at a sufficiently-low price with the performance Americans demand, and so these standards were put in place to attempt to prevent foreign companies from competing in the US diesel passenger car market.
  You hear US auto companies scream about CAFE standards for gasoline vehicles anytime talk of raising those standards comes up, but were and are strangely silent about diesel passenger car standards.
  This is mainly why. It's more to do with limiting competition than anything else.
  Strat
  
  --
  Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
15. Re:They all did by toddestan · 2016-04-23 09:05 · Score: 1
  
  Don't you think that the engineers who had to install expensive urea and similar systems in their vehicles to meet emissions might just be a bit curious how VW could sell cars without those systems?
16. Re:They all did by Aighearach · 2016-04-25 05:41 · Score: 1
  
  No. Most of the affected cars had those systems too. The engineers probably presumed that they were using more of it.
  And to the extent that "engineers [were] curious" I would expect them to be curious about lots of things that other companies do that they were not being paid money by their employers to reverse-engineer. If the company was interested, it would more likely be in the form of trying to license the technology, not in trying to reverse-engineer stuff that will all turn out to have had patents-pending. It just doesn't happen in a mature patent-rich environment with a limited number of mostly-large companies. Those engineers work on their jobs, not their curiosities.
Re:The ONLY apology accepted is by TWX · 2016-04-20 07:50 · Score: 1, Funny

WOW! WHAT a HIT! I haven't seen a play like THAT since the last time the CUBS won the PENNANT!

--
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Re:The ONLY apology accepted is by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 07:51 · Score: 1

Harakiri
Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:05 · Score: 0

Unlike VW, Mitsubishi Autos has been struggling the last decade. They almost pulled out of the US markets. I think the cheap ass $10k Mirage sales have been enough to keep them going here, but just barely. Across the board you can see marketshare decline and fewer models being offered world wide. I remember back in the day Mitsubishi was the place to go for cheap sports cars, the Starion, 3000gt, Eclipse, Lancer. Things have surely changed.
Hopefully this isn't as wide as the VW problem. If it is, I don't see Mitsubishi surviving. At least here in the US. (Then again, I might pick up a new 2015 Mirage on fire sale for dirt cheap if it does.)
1. Re:Ouch by jellomizer · 2016-04-20 08:25 · Score: 2
  
  Also VW had a big marketing campaign showing how Clean Diesel was so much more better than Hybrid cars. Touting their superior gas mileage and green creds, vs those lame priuses. Showing VW was just flat lying about it, despite a full marketing hype. Mitsubishi, at least in America, may had posted fuel economy, but they weren't doing their big sales push because of it.
  
  --
  If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
2. Re:Ouch by HornWumpus · 2016-04-20 08:39 · Score: 1
  
  The Evo is still relatively cheep for its performance. It's not like the 3000gt or Eclipse were cheep cars, at least not the ones you wanted.
  
  --
  John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
3. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:46 · Score: 0
  
  Mileage, soot, sulfur odor control, and overall emissions reductions were all VALIDATED by these discoveries. The sole errant factor is NOx overproduction, and I can't recall VW ever specifically producing anything resembling a "full marketing hype" about a relatively small constituent of exhaust gases that no one had ever remotely cared about. I also don't recall the "clean diesel" campaign being targeted entirely or even primarily at hybrids, which weren't exactly flying off the shelves when the advertising campaign was active.
  Nice try at total historical revisionism, though.
  Pretending to give a crap about this rings awfully hollow when you can't even get the facts right.
4. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 09:08 · Score: 0
  
  Are you enjoying those nice diesel boats travelling around the world to deliver those rare earth materials and additional parts needed to build an hybrid?
  Each battery pack uses 10–15 kg (22–33 lb) of lanthanum, and each Prius electric motor contains 1 kg (2 lb) of neodymium; production of the car is described as "the biggest user of rare earths of any object in the world. - Reuters
  Not to mention that they're used on Fugly cars like the Prius
5. Re:Ouch by mspohr · 2016-04-20 09:10 · Score: 2
  
  In addition to up to 35x higher NOx emissions, VW also admitted that CO2 and fuel consumption were not reported accurately (i.e. they lied).
  I guess you will only care about NOx if you get lung cancer, asthma, emphysema or heart disease.
  Wikipedia has a good write-up on the problems:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  
  --
  I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
6. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 12:07 · Score: 0
  
  In addition to up to 35x higher NOx emissions
  False. Aggregate net production of NOx, according to the ICCT study itself, is approximately 3-4x a normal, compliant vehicle and less than a single school bus, construction machine, or heavy-duty pickup truck. The overall impact is so small that it can't even be detected through empirical observation of air quality.
  
  VW also admitted that CO2 and fuel consumption were not reported accurately (i.e. they lied).
  False. The vehicles affected by the NOx cheat device outperformed their fuel consumption and CO2 EPA ratings, by an average of about 15%, based on ICCT's results.
  
  I guess you will only care about NOx if you get lung cancer, asthma, emphysema or heart disease.
  NOx does not cause any of the listed conditions. It is a lung irritant, but it is utterly harmless without VOCs and particulate matter in air pollution. If you look at the output of all three required components (NOx at 4-15x test limits, VOCs at Wikipedia has a good write-up on the problems
  Wikipedia has a cobbled-together collection of information that references sources actually containing facts. The Wikipedia article itself is largely devoid of analysis.
7. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 15:54 · Score: 0
  
  You mean cheap, right? Or is Mitsubishi contracted out to aviaries now.
8. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 17:34 · Score: 0
  
  Also VW had a big marketing campaign showing how Clean Diesel was so much more better than Hybrid cars.
  Frankly, it is, even with the cheating engines. Diesel is more efficient and while it produces a bit more NOx, it produces far fewer ultra fine particulates, less carbon monoxide, less unburnt hydrocarbons and a lot less carbon dioxide. A petrol hybrid may be somewhat better than a conventional petrol car, but it still has all the disadvantages of a petrol engine.
  
  Showing VW was just flat lying about it, despite a full marketing hype
  To be fair, only a small number of VW employees actually know there was cheating code in the ECU until shortly before it went public. VW's marketing department honestly thought the cars met all regulations. And even then the claim stands - the EA189 engines are very clean by every reasonable measure.
9. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-21 03:36 · Score: 0
  
  No true Scotsman fallacy.
  You are claiming that the measures being used cannot be reasonable because the engines don't meet them.
10. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-23 03:53 · Score: 0
  
  Not in the post you are replying to. Maybe you should read it again.
11. Re:Ouch by toddestan · 2016-04-23 09:09 · Score: 1
  
  No, he's referring to the Eagle Talon and Summit, which were cars made by Mitsubishi and sold under the Eagle brand.
Dayz and Dayz Roox by Nutria · 2016-04-20 08:10 · Score: 1

Who the hell thinks up these names? And who the hell buys them???

--
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
1. Re:Dayz and Dayz Roox by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:20 · Score: 0
  
  these guys:
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
2. Re:Dayz and Dayz Roox by BasilBrush · 2016-04-20 09:18 · Score: 1
  
  Japanese?
No problem by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:32 · Score: 0

If you don't want any of those cars, feel free to send them to North America. I imagine they will sell off quickly and nobody will give a shit about the mileage. I'll take one of each!
I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 08:40 · Score: 0

When auto manufacturers lie about emissions they get the inquisition. When politicians lie, cheat and steal it's business as usual.
1. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 10:13 · Score: 0
  
  The Spanish one?
2. Re:I don't get it by kilfarsnar · 2016-04-21 01:45 · Score: 1
  
  No one expects it!
  
  --
  "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
Big Difference by Thelasko · 2016-04-20 08:55 · Score: 1

There's a big difference between Mitsubishi and Volkswagen. Volkswagen spent an incredible amount of time and money developing software to defeat the test. Mitsubishi increased tire pressures.

--
One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
Is KIA involved? by JimSadler · 2016-04-20 10:12 · Score: 1

KIAs seem to be selling quite well. I wonder if they also are involved in this affair.
Wake me up by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 10:24 · Score: 0

when they find a company that didn't fudge the tests to some extent.
The issue here is if VW brought the game to a whole new level.
Wrong company.. by Ancil · 2016-04-20 11:09 · Score: 1

Actually, it would be more accurate to say they "Pulled a Hyunadia," i.e., overstated mileage.
Volkswagon's mileage data was correct; they were just spewing pollutants.
VW must be thrilled by TsuruchiBrian · 2016-04-20 11:50 · Score: 1

Now that Mitsubishi is in the limelight for being the latest car company to pull a Volkswagen... oh wait...
Not a VW by sunking2 · 2016-04-20 14:27 · Score: 1

A Hyandi/Kia. Both were found guilty of this and both ended up paying like $300/car. Hardly their demise
I'm not surprised... by kimvette · 2016-04-20 14:29 · Score: 1

I'm not surprised.
Mitsubishi has been phoning it in since the '90s where their Automotive division is concerned.
They used to make very nice vehicles - and Chrysler used to import them branded as Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth models (Galant -> Dodge Challenger/Plymouth Sapporo - a very nice car for the time, then the Dodge Colt, Dodge's compact pickup trucks, etc.) and then the DiamondStar partnership was struck. Then they came out with the Starion which was a nice 2+2 "sports" car (a ponycar really) and marketed by Chrysler as the Dodge and Plymouth Conquest, Then came the 3000GT/Stealth and the Eclipse. Then Mitsubishi quit caring about their auto segment - quality dropped, they killed the sportscars, and they started parading the non-turbo FWD Eclipse as a serious sportscar (despite inferior performance and crappy handling), and they have been getting worse ever since, and dealerships have been abandoning the brand for makes that actually provide dealer support.
That they're not putting money into actual performance efficiency and emission controls and are instead cheating the system through ECU trickery and/or delivering "ringers" for certification testing doesn't surprise me at all.
If I could trade Mitsubishi's existence for any number of extinct marques (Saab, Studebaker/Avanti, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Saturn, AMC, De Tomaso Modena, Fisker, or heck, even Plymouth (with a product line distinct from Dodge's, like they used to have up through the mid-'70s - the Roadrunner/Satellite was sweet for a musclecar) I would trade for any one of the others to make a return, because Mitsubishi is an automaker that truly deserves to go under.

--
The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
1. Re:I'm not surprised... by drinkypoo · 2016-04-20 17:40 · Score: 1
  
  Then came the 3000GT/Stealth and the Eclipse. Then Mitsubishi quit caring about their auto segment - quality dropped, they killed the sportscars, and they started parading the non-turbo FWD Eclipse as a serious sportscar (despite inferior performance and crappy handling), and they have been getting worse ever since, and dealerships have been abandoning the brand for makes that actually provide dealer support.
  You forgot the Evo. I mean, it's gone now, right? But no one can argue that it wasn't a serious performance vehicle.
  
  If I could trade Mitsubishi's existence for any number of extinct marques (Saab, Studebaker/Avanti, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Saturn, AMC, De Tomaso Modena, Fisker, or heck, even Plymouth (with a product line distinct from Dodge's, like they used to have up through the mid-'70s - the Roadrunner/Satellite was sweet for a musclecar)
  And it was built on the same platform as other Chryslers, and the Dodges were available with a broader, better range of engines.
  
  --
  "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
this is Japan by Anonymous Coward · 2016-04-20 15:21 · Score: 0

A large Japanese corporation in Japan pulls a fast one on the Japanese.... nothing will actually come of it.
Re:The ONLY apology accepted is by davester666 · 2016-04-20 20:30 · Score: 1

Whoosh!
The OP is saying the management of Mitsubishi should spend several days listen to Harry Carry expound on the virtues of the 10 commandments and how they apply to corporations.

--
Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
Dayz by ThatsNotPudding · 2016-04-21 00:03 · Score: 1

...as well as the Dayz and Dayz Roox

However, they went on to stress that the 'Chicken 4 Dayz' model is unaffected.