Slashdot Mirror


Opera Adds Free VPN-Client With Unlimited Usage To Its Desktop Browser

On Thursday, Opera announced that it is adding a free built-in virtual private network (VPN) client to its desktop browser. The feature, which isn't available on other popular Web browsers, will allow users to hide their IP address, unblock firewalls and access region-locked content. It will also help users protect their personal information on public Wi-Fi networks as it offers 256-bit encryption. "Everyone deserves to be private online if they want to be," Krystian Kolondra, SVP at Opera told Slashdot in a statement. "By adding a free, unlimited VPN directly into the browser, no additional download or extensions from an unknown third-party provider are necessary."

The move comes a year after Opera acquired North American VPN company SurfEasy. Unlike Chrome and Firefox, which require you to use an additional third-party tool (such as an extension), Opera's VPN offering is baked in the browser. What's more, it is free and offers unlimited usage. The feature is available on Opera's Mac, Windows, and Linux clients.

101 comments

  1. Sorry, still nope by Anrego · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Opera is still (and will probably always be) that weird guy no one really likes but few have specific complaints about.

    Personally I'm strongly debating switching to chromium because firefox has gone to shit and palemoon doesn't look long for this world unfortunately. I never even considered opera, but despite this reminder that they are still around and despite my admission that I don't really have anything specific against them, I'm still not going to.

    1. Re:Sorry, still nope by C3lt · · Score: 1

      It's called "Pale Moon" it's supposed to be that color.

    2. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Says you. I switched to Opera as my primary browser back in 1997. I loved it and had no complaints about it. Sadly, since they bastardized it by dropping Presto and switching to Chromium I gave up on it and switched to Firefox.

    3. Re:Sorry, still nope by Forgefather · · Score: 2

      I switched to Vivaldi recently and after fiddling through the options for a bit I was able to get a pretty good browser out of it. Basically i went through the options and disabled all of the new UX design stuff, like tab stacking, and moved the tabs to the side. Its built on top of Chromium though so you still get the extensions.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    4. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera's just the best. Sorry, but it's true.

    5. Re:Sorry, still nope by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      ...disabled all of the new UX design stuff, like tab stacking...

      That is the single largest reason I'm considering switching browsers! Tab stacking back in Opera 12 or 15 was great, I miss it, and haven't found a solution for Firefox (that still works) or Chrome that I like to date.

    6. Re:Sorry, still nope by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      Why bother? Just use chromium...

    7. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my case, Chromium is incredibly buggy and Vivaldi is more reliable, even in the alpha version. I still use both, but for anything with flash objects or video playback or anything even remotely fancy (amazon), I have to use Vivaldi, since Chromium just crashes (I'm so sick of that "Aw Snap!" page). I'm on Ubuntu with AMD graphics via fglrx. If it actually worked, I wouldn't have a problem with Chromium, but Vivaldi fits the bill, and the devs are less bone-headed than Google.

    8. Re:Sorry, still nope by Forgefather · · Score: 2

      The main reason for me is that I really need side tabs. That was the one feature keeping me in fire fox for years because I have anywhere from 20 to 50 tabs open at a time. This is simply not doable in Chrome or Chromium without really hackish addons that create sepperate windows for the tabs. All in all Vivaldi was everything I wanted in a browser. (Chrome - Google) + side tabs

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    9. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean Opera WAS the best. No one has topped Opera 12, even after 3 years since dropping Presto.

    10. Re:Sorry, still nope by Forgefather · · Score: 1

      maybe, but I keep a ton of tabs open at a time and in order to keep as many one the screen at the same time as possible I disabled the icon tabs. When I did this the "tabs on the tabs" became so small that they were difficult to navigate, and it was annoying when I tried to move tabs around and they would stack instead of making room for the new tab on the list.

      I would imagine that they are incredibly useful if you learn the hotkeys, but I haven't had the time or the desire to do so at the moment.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    11. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I'll never understand the "Firefox has gone to shit" mentality, but I guess I'll give people an excuse to post the same copypasta FUD if they'd like. For me it has always been just fine, I've just never convinced myself into thinking that software will always stay the same or that customization should always be baked into the browser. Chromium/Electron browsers don't really offer anything compelling to me, since I don't rely on Google's services much and I have no problem trading some performance and personal time to have a browser that's so convenient in the ways that count for me.

    12. Re:Sorry, still nope by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      Seconded. Opera was the browser you used if you were curious about what new features were coming to Firefox in a year or two.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:Sorry, still nope by foradoxium · · Score: 2

      Agree.

      I use both Firefox and Chrome at both home and work, and my phone. I actually prefer firefox on my phone.

      As someone who uses and likes both browsers I believe firefox is as good, if not slightly better, than Chrome. I prefer it's UI for addons, it has fireFTP, and to be honest it seems, on my systems at least, that firefox is slightly faster to launch and load my initial pages.

    14. Re:Sorry, still nope by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      I've transitioned to having 8 or 9 Chrome windows open at a time, where I used to have only a single window with 8 or 9 tab groups...

      Any tab stacking done today is still not what it was in days gone by...Vivaldi still doesn't do it quite how I like: two rows of tabs, top row is groups, second is tabs in that group. I may be mistaken on saying this came from Opera, but it was a while ago. I definitely had it with Firefox until they stopped updating the extension and it would crash my browser..man, I hate losing all my open tabs!

    15. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I'm strongly debating switching to chromium

      Same engine, same browser. Opera is based on Chromium.

    16. Re:Sorry, still nope by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I use Gmail and Google calendar in Firefox and it works just fine. Google Maps is really slow these days though; I'll have to try that in Chromium to see if it's different.

      Anyway, my understanding is that Chromium's every-tab-is-a-separate-process is less memory-efficient than Firefox's single-process model, so if you have a lot of tabs open and/or value memory efficiency, Firefox is the way to go.

    17. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I never even considered opera, but despite this reminder that they are still around and despite my admission that I don't really have anything specific against them, I'm still not going to.

      Opera once saved my a$$ by allowing me to pay a bill (yes, I came home late and I was just 10 minutes from closing time). Firefox (back then) deactivated the java plugin due to a sudden vulnerability. That's very safe-minded but I really needed to pay that bill (and it's not like I kept using it unsafely... I would go to the physical bank if needed, but all I had was 10 minutes late in the night).

      I understand Opera 12 is still reasonably secure -- I'll test it on my weakest machines (and yes, I do need them... Linux is stable and everyone here wants to use the internet NOW... a single machine is the origin of fierce fights).

      I tested the new Chrome-based Opera and I'm not sure of what to think but features like secure VPN might be game changers. I'd like to do some banking away from home and I don't trust the work environment because:
      a) they use Windows and
      b) it's THEIR environment to eavesdrop as they like it.

      Not sure if I can trust their VPN, though... there were recent news about VPN frailties. I need to sort out who makes alternatives enough secure for banking.

      I support surveillance to detect the bad guys but I seriously don't want my data exposed. I'm sure I can trust the good guys, but I'm a good guy, too. They can trust me. ;-/

    18. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clarifying: I meant using Opera in my Android phone, not on my PC at work (they wouldn't allow it for starters). I understand there's a plethora of other dangers in using an outdated Android (4.0) -- even if the VPN can be made to be secure.

      C'est la vie... 8-(

    19. Re:Sorry, still nope by jimbo · · Score: 2

      I test drove Firefox for a few days recently, taking it through some fairly heavy testing and it seemed to do just fine, moderate memory requirements, good performance, etc. I don't use it as my daily driver but I think saying it has "gone to shit" is a brutal and unfair exaggeration.

      As for Opera; given their new owners I'm not going to trust it with my data. Vivaldi may not be super pretty but it's very configurable and uses Chrome extensions, so that has replaced Chrome for me.

    20. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Seamonkey, from http://www.seamonkey-project.org/. It is the spiritual successor to Netscape Navigator, with all of the modern features.

    21. Re:Sorry, still nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your webGL and HW acceleration settings. Google Maps without either of those is a dog on my machine. Rendering the page is an order of magnitude slower with those off..

    22. Re:Sorry, still nope by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I used Opera exclusively for quite a while up until it changed after 12.0. It was a very good browser, but then they tried to be Chrome...
      I haven't tried it out in quite a while, they may have recovered from their mistakes by now.

    23. Re:Sorry, still nope by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I don't remember that configuration. It may have been part of an extension.

    24. Re:Sorry, still nope by AJolly_2000 · · Score: 1

      Loved that - and the ability to easily search through tabs, close them. etc.

    25. Re:Sorry, still nope by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Text to speech, tabbed browsing, mobile browser, online security measures, and and and and....Opera was the first browser to provide all this that many others copied or have yet to implement. Opera is the Tesla in the browser world, the brightest mind with the most inventions and innovations who gets zero credit because other bullies (the Edisons) claim it was their idea.

    26. Re:Sorry, still nope by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Pale Moon is how Firefox should be out of the box. Too bad that it takes a group of volunteers to decrapify what Mozilla pumps out.

  2. No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now that Opera is going to be owned by the Chinese, they cannot offer anything compelling. No, thank you. No one in their right mind will ever trust the Chinese. Opera is not open source, and because the Chinese company that is buying Opera has close ties to the Chinese government, you cannot expect any privacy whatsoever. Simply put, Opera is, IMHO, no longer a real option to those concerned with privacy.

    1. Re:No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i almost forgot about the chinese buyout.... this vpn implementation will have more holes in it than a golf course and the chinese gov will be the only ones with a tee time

    2. Re:No, Thank You by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Yes, but think about it for a second. With the built-in VPN they won't be able to spy on you!

    3. Re:No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Chinese company that is buying Opera has close ties to the Chinese government,

      That's just FUD. If you read anything about the companies that make up the consortium (it wasn't just one China based company) that bought the Opera properties, you see they are just capitalistic as any other multinational corporations. Mergers, acquisitions, venture capital groups, monopoly lawsuits, investors, high finance, etc. are all part of the Asian megacorps that are emerging from China. Besides, I can't believe after the surveillance state rant bait that's posted daily here on slashdot, that anyone would trust US companies (or European or Israeli ones) to not spy on their users. Just because Apple and Microsoft now have decided to go for the positive PR by making a show of fighting the Feds after decades of gleefully cooperating with them at the expense of their customers privacy, suddenly that makes them all more trustworthy? Pshaw.

    4. Re:No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are totally intercepting the traffic and spying on you regardless.

    5. Re:No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy was totally not sarcastic.

    6. Re: No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot is american. your words are largely wasted here.

      chinese == bad, untrustworthy. amerucan == good, trustworthy.

      complete rubbish of course but its a mostly amrrucan userbase.

    7. Re:No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score: -1, Woosh)

    8. Re: No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be amurican

    9. Re:No, Thank You by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Chinese companies like Huawei have been found to spy on customers for the benefit of the Chinese government.

      Moreover, Opera is a closed-source browser, so there's no telling what's in there. At least with Firefox and Chromium (not Chrome), they're open source so the likelihood that they're spying on you is much lower: it'd be too easy for someone to just browse the code and see it (and at least on Linux versions, it's built from source by the distro, not by Mozilla/Google).

    10. Re:No, Thank You by nebular · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if the company is capitalistic if they just turn over any requested info to the Chinese Government. And yes it's true the American companies aren't really more trustworthy.

      Really you should not trust any VPN that you don't have complete control or trust of the encryption and decryption points.

    11. Re:No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mention about the Chinese's lack of concern for privacy. This is true.. but dude you need to wake up. AMERICANS have been spying more than any nation in human history. Right at this moment the NSA is shamelessly spying on the entirely planet. Americas total lack of concern for privacy makes Nazis, Communists and ISIS spying seem tame by comparison.

    12. Re:No, Thank You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No holes required. The VPN will be terminated at an Opera-controlled point, which will be accessible by parties designated by the parent company.

      Opera has been doing this for a while. The browser compression technology operated under a similar principle. Send Opera a request, which they will forward, interpret the reply, , and send a compressed version of the reply back. In order to provide compression for TLS, or more likely SSL sessions, they MITM the communication. Yes, Opera is in the business of intercepting transactions in the financial and otherwise privacy-sensitive realm.

  3. Netflix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that Netflix is actively blocking VPN users, I wonder how this will play out?

    1. Re:Netflix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were a Netflix customer (I'm not) and they stopped talking to me, I would cancel my service and just download their TV shows for free. Everyone wins: they get to say they got rid of the undesired customer, and I still get my TV.

      All DRM goes like that. That's how I got out of buying movies on optical discs: they made it too much a pain in the ass, so I stopped harrassing them with my unwanted money. We two parties finally came to that peaceful everyone-wins arrangement.

      When you say no to paying customers, you're saying no to money. And that's fine, because media companies don't care about money; they're in it for the art. Right? Because that is the only possible way that stuff like geoblocking, DRM, etc make even the slightest bit of sense: as art! Humanity is always finding new ways to express "Fuck you, I am not a sellout!"

  4. Will be broken privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't take long for researchers to demonstrate how they bypassed the privacy mechanisms and could still track people anyway.

  5. 1998 called.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want their web browser back!

  6. Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No thanks. Most "free" VPNs are well-publicized to data farm you in exchange for being free (a la Windows 10). If you actually want quality and privacy, you have to pay for it. My preference is AirVPN but there's other good ones out there.

    1. Re:Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit quick to judge, are we?

    2. Re:Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've found the Tor Browser and Tor to be excellent free VPN services for browsing and general networking, respectively.

    3. Re: Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Wrong thread, buddy.

    4. Re:Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI has come to the same conclusion!

    5. Re:Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing I'm not using it for anything illegal like journalism or thinking for myself.

    6. Re: Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Serenissima · · Score: 1

      I'm not your buddy, pal.

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    7. Re: Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I'm not your pal, guy.

    8. Re: Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Serenissima · · Score: 1

      I'm not your guy, buddy!

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    9. Re:Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid Nazi German Fuck, if you don't like it just don't use it. No need to troll about it.

    10. Re:Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by blackomegax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fact of life: if you aren't paying for something, YOU are the product.

    11. Re: Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not your buddy, friend!

    12. Re:Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      No thanks. Most "free" VPNs are well-publicized to data farm you in exchange for being free (a la Windows 10). If you actually want quality and privacy, you have to pay for it. My preference is AirVPN but there's other good ones out there.

      Not to mention - wasn't SurfEasy one of those where yes, they were free, but they did it by using their user's connection? So in effect, yes, you were getting "VPN for free", but you were also providing VPN services for them as well as payment.

    13. Re: Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you fuckers get a room, please, take your "Goodnight, Johnboy" theatrics and foreplay somewhere we don't all have to listen ...

    14. Re: Like HolaVPN and Zenmate? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1
  7. No, Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Opera is being bought by a Chinese tech company with strong ties to the Chinese government. Opera is, IMHO, no longer to be trusted. Sad.

  8. Opera by puddingebola · · Score: 2

    When people discuss Opera, they always bring up the features they introduced that are a part of all browsers now; will this be one more?

    1. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What new feature? Being spied by China?

  9. Cool Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool Idea, too bad they screwed up the rest of the browser by switching to Blink(Chrome), cutting features, and screwing up the UI by "modernizing it."

    I'll stick with Seamonkey, Otter, and Qupzilla.

  10. I wish home ISPs would offer VPNs for travelers by davidwr · · Score: 1

    It will also help users protect their personal information on public Wi-Fi networks as it offers 256-bit encryption.

    This is why I avoid non-encrypted public Wi-Fi whenever possible - too big a chance of a passive eavesdropper (the risk of an evil-twin/man-in-the-middle exists even with encrypted WiFi if the passphrase is well-known, so that by itself not a reason to prefer encrypted WiFi over unencrypted WiFi).

    If the home-internet providers would offer "VPN service to make it look like you are in your home city" that would make "not cutting the cord" that much more attractive.

    Heck, if they could work out a joint deal with the media companies and the Netflixes of the world so I could watch "only in [my home country] movies while traveling abroad" I might even be willing to pay $1/day extra for out-of-country use.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:I wish home ISPs would offer VPNs for travelers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VPN over SSH back to your home. Has everything you're asking for.

      SSH Tunneling - Poor Techie's VPN

    2. Re:I wish home ISPs would offer VPNs for travelers by Anrego · · Score: 1

      It's trivial to set this up yourself, just get some kind of dyndns type service so you can find your machine and either run a vpn server or just tunnel through SSH (lots of guides on how to do this, just google it).

  11. Opera, just run some Tor nodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't care nor want anything proprietary.

  12. Does it also supply links to cracked databases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bank and medical ones, that is! God I love this Putin's favorite browser browser.

  13. Already blocked by Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The abusive admins at Wikipedia have already blocked Opera VPN users from editing. The abusive admins won't stop until no IP user can edit.

  14. A lot of people don't care by aepervius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really don't care for example that they catch that I am trying to watch the daily show from germany or the rare few video which tells me "GEMA blocked blahblah youtube license not apid wahhwahhwambulance"

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  15. Re:North American VPN company SurfEasy by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Fine let us get one based in China, or Russia, perhaps Iran, or Saudi Arabia.
    Or do you think your European countries are so much more noble that they wouldn't do such a thing? Perhaps they are just better at hiding it. You know without constitutional levels of freedom of the press for many members.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  16. VPN = View Porn Nightly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (posting anon since I used to work at Opera a decade ago)

    1. Re:VPN = View Porn Nightly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a fuck? It's not like they can do anything.

  17. SurfEasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Description from SurfEasy's chrome extension page:

    We are SurfEasy; an Opera Software company. We started with a Kickstarter campaign 4 years ago, and 2 years later launched our VPN. This year, we were thrilled to be acquired by Opera, to bring our service to even more people across the globe.

    We have privacy experts like Michael Geist on our team, to ensure that we’re at the forefront of the privacy industry and to make sure that we’re always on the right track.

    We are a no-log network, meaning that we don’t keep any logs about your information, your browsing data or your download history. We don’t need this information, because we don’t sell it on to third parties. We make our money through charging a small amount for our service. This means we’re accountable, reliable, and truly secure.

    So I guess they will still charge for subscription if you use a non Opera browser with a SurfEasy extension, but will give it away for free if use their client browser?

  18. Should be called the Honeypot Browser by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    The browser is compromised by the Chinese and the bogus VPN claims are there to lure the undesirables. Here's a secure browser with proxy option: https://epicbrowser.com/

  19. Re:North American VPN company SurfEasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    We don't have a Constitutional level of freedom of the press in the US. Fuck, we don't have a Constitutional level of any kind of freedom in the US.

  20. SOCKS by ooloorie · · Score: 2

    Both Firefox and Chrome support SOCKS, which is just as good as VPN for web browsing and a lot easier to set up (most hosting accounts effectively include it as part of SSH service).

  21. trivial for geeks by davidwr · · Score: 1

    For the average Joe, not so much.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:trivial for geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, your SlashID is low enough that you're not an average Joe. If you want this, you can do it. If you want this for your family, you can do that too (OpenVPN for example). If you want this for the average Joe, you are actually capable of setting it up yourself and selling it as a service.

    2. Re:trivial for geeks by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      For the average Joe, not so much.

      Well, one might argue that concern about the privacy of one's data requires a certain level of understanding regarding what's going on. Furthermore, one might argue that VPNing to your home connection will keep the bloke at Starbucks running Wireshark from attaining anything useful, but data going out your network's front door won't help keep Uncle Sam from getting what he wants.

      That being said, Asus routers are very simple to set up for PPTP VPNs...no, not the most secure thing ever, but functional enough to get you Netflix in China. Literally, it's a matter of clicking 'enable vpn server', then adding a few usernames and passwords. While using Untangle is a bit more involved (you need a desktop with two NICs, and to install the software, etc)...but the software is free, and the OpenVPN module will give you a downloadable executable preconfigured to connect to your router.

      It's not the kind of thing that everyone will want, but it's possible for a moderately intelligent person to go from "i want it" to "i have it" in a Saturday afternoon.

    3. Re:trivial for geeks by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the average Joe doesn't tend to care either.

      I have to imagine it's a pretty small market of people who are tech savvy enough to get the risks of public wifi but not be able to do something about it themselves.

  22. The opposite is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you actually want quality and privacy, you have to pay for it.

    That's a very odd comment. as it's so clearly and obviously false in the case of security services like VPNs:

    (i) Commercial VPN services generally don't use open source VPN systems. As a result, what they're doing behind the scenes is completely unknown and by definition this makes them a security risk to use.

    (ii) The 'P' in VPN stands for "Private". By definition a VPN cannot be private when a commercial untrusted entity has access to your Virtual Network.

    (iii) All companies are easily undermined by malicious governments and other bad actors, and so a commercial VPN can never offer a strong guarantee of privacy and security.

    If you want a VPN with security and privacy that you can rely on, the only good approach is for the trusted members of your VPN to run their own open source VPN package between them. There is no alternative that doesn't entail a large dose of wishful thinking.

    Payment implies commercial, but quality in a VPN requires security and privacy. Those two requirements are in conflict --- a commercial enterprise cannot provide them regardless of how much you pay.

    1. Re:The opposite is true by blackomegax · · Score: 1

      I pay for a VPN that supports openVPN, and they take bitcoin. If you are using a free service, you are the product. They can MITM your traffic as it comes out of their end of the tunnel, sniff it, route it, inject ads into it, anything. It's a security risk of the highest order. (technically, a paid service can do these things as well, but if they were caught they'd have their reputation run into the ground and go under.)

    2. Re:The opposite is true by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Since you're so against commercial VPNs, how exactly do you get on the internet without a commercial ISP?

      And if you're in favor of free VPNs, how do you think they finance themselves without your money?

  23. Your data is now safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your data will now travel safely before being re-routed to China for some DPI

  24. Re:North American VPN company SurfEasy by mlts · · Score: 1

    Even if it is based in NA, a VPN is always better than nothing:

    1: On an untrusted Wi-Fi network, it blocks snooping, FireSheep attacks, and other monkey business.
    2: Some ISPs actively MITM http connections. I've had one ISP that actually would inject pop-unders for surveys. Another ISP would add identifying headers to every HTTP transaction. A VPN ensures that those shenanigans don't happen, or are at least moved to the VPN provider.
    3: It raised the bar for geolocation. Yes, it can be done by sophisticated timing attacks, but all the end site gets is the VPN provider's location for the most part.
    4: It isn't Tor, but it provides some IP address shielding, without having the VPN exit blocked wholesale at virtually every website as Tor exit nodes tend to wind up.

    In this case, anything is better than nothing.

  25. Not to be trusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are wholly uninformed. Huawei and other Chinese concerns who are certainly capitalistic as you say, have been found to have included "spyware" ROMS in their networking gear. Google it. It happened and happens. Why do you think their gear is not allowed on federal networks or contractor networks. Ditto Check Point firewalls and network appliances. How do I know this. Firewall engineer for one of the largest ISPs in the nation who deal with the federal government daily.

    The Chinese are not to be trusted despite what you are anyone in favor of dealing with them may state.

    1. Re:Not to be trusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wholly uninformed. Huawei and other Chinese concerns who are certainly capitalistic as you say, have been found to have included "spyware" ROMS in their networking gear. Google it. It happened and happens. Why do you think their gear is not allowed on federal networks or contractor networks. Ditto Check Point firewalls and network appliances. How do I know this. Firewall engineer for one of the largest ISPs in the nation who deal with the federal government daily.

      The Chinese are not to be trusted despite what you are anyone in favor of dealing with them may state.

      Exactly the same goes for several US companies.

    2. Re:Not to be trusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Huawei and other Chinese concerns who are certainly capitalistic as you say, have been found to have included "spyware" ROMS in their networking gear.

      I'm not familiar with the case nor do I know whether these are just suspicions or already proved fact.

      What I know is that the USA has been saying that spying others is not a big deal, because everyone does it (remember the Merkel case?).

      If it's not a big deal, the Chinese can do it, too, isn't it?

    3. Re:Not to be trusted by Do+You+Smell+That · · Score: 1

      Why do you think their gear is not allowed on federal networks or contractor networks. Ditto Check Point firewalls and network appliances.

      Because then our agencies couldn't get our "spyware" on our networks... ;-)

      --
      I'm not good at making signatures...
  26. "5.4 MB That's a lot of data!" by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ars Technica is a little more cautious about what is being offered here --- which is an alpha release for the desktop only.

    I am a little wary myself when someone promises "no fees, no limits" on services which tend to get expensive as you scale up. Opera bundles free, unlimited VPN client into its browser

    1. Re:"5.4 MB That's a lot of data!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago Opera already sped up their browser by lossily compressing images and using their proxy (very useful when you have low bandwidth). If they could afford it then, it should be even easier now that they have more capital.

    2. Re:"5.4 MB That's a lot of data!" by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they use the same definition of unlimited some cell phones company use. You can use all that you want, as long as you want, as long as you don't mind dialup-like speeds.

    3. Re:"5.4 MB That's a lot of data!" by guises · · Score: 1
      Right at the top of that article:

      "At this point we're not planning to charge for it," vows Opera.

      That's quite a vow!

  27. Obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, some good reasons to try Opera! All the traffic from my proprietary, closed-source browser will be routed through the same sever and logged in one convenient place. I won't have to bother logging packets any longer since I'll know for sure they're all going to an Opera server. I'll be in a pool with all 8 other Opera users sharing an IP address. That'll make it much easier for advertisers to deliver targeted content.

    Everybody wins!

    1. Re: Obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera source code is open, dumbass.

  28. Re: North American VPN company SurfEasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it guarantees somebody is in the middle of all your communications

    Now it's a question of if you trust them

  29. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My experience with Chinese: Chinese think Chinese are superior, so it is okay to mistreat anyone else.