Slashdot Mirror


Fired Reddit Exec Launches Competing Site (thenextweb.com)

An anonymous reader writes: "Dan McComas, the former second-in-command at Reddit -- and vocal critic of its more inflammatory groups -- wants to build a better Reddit, one that focuses on 'healthy, positive communities,'" reports TheNextWeb. Raising $3 million, Imzy.com quietly launched earlier this year with over 500 discussion forums, aspiring to become an advertising-free space where content creators can interact with their fans. Moderators and users of Imzy can be "tipped" with online payments from other users, while the site hopes to remain advertising-free by taking a cut from on-site transactions. But "at its core though, Imzy wants to provide a safe place to share and discuss without the fear of being harassed, a problem Reddit has struggled with for several years."

26 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. define healthy by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    oh, and positive, too.

    1. Re:define healthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      am i the only one that felt the cult vibe from the website?

    2. Re:define healthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A community that focuses on giving wealth and general messages of positivity and encouragement to a person in a leadership role encased in a cutesy art style? Never.

    3. Re: define healthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A community where minorities and women are gods and the straight white man is not allowed unless he denigrates his own kind to bow to his new overlords.

    4. Re: define healthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No dissenting opinions allowed. The biggest progressive echo chamber imaginable, where no one is allowes to question this ideology. And no one is allowed to say anything remotely controversial or offensive because it might "trigger" someone's negative feelings and cause untold "psychological" damage.

    5. Re: define healthy by WarJolt · · Score: 5, Funny

      No dissenting opinions allowed. The biggest progressive echo chamber imaginable, where no one is allowes to question this ideology. And no one is allowed to say anything remotely controversial or offensive because it might "trigger" someone's negative feelings and cause untold "psychological" damage.

      Oh... so basically /.

    6. Re: define healthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which is why I'm registered in as a mulitracial trans 'man' refugee, rape and FGM survivor.

      Bow to my hormonally enlarged clitoral stub.

    7. Re:define healthy by McGruber · · Score: 4, Interesting
      IMZY.com's definition of healthy apparently includes a Delusion of Anonymity. From the site:

      Create different profiles to fit your various identities, or even participate anonymously, all easily under one account.

    8. Re: define healthy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, I checked out the site and it's invite only. Did you get an invite? Have you actually confirmed that it discriminates against straight white men?

      There are too many perpetual victims on Slashdot these days.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re: define healthy by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A community where minorities and women are gods and the straight white man is not allowed unless he denigrates his own kind to bow to his new overlords.

      It's terrible. That was literally the only place on the internet where a straight white man could feel comfortable and it's been ruined. There is officially nowhere else for you. You are now an oppressed minority.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re: define healthy by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's when those perpetual whiners want to invade those spaces that are mine and take them away.

      So why are you whining all over this thread then, given that this is about creating a whole new place? The founders of the new place haven't taken anything away from you yet you whinge and throw insults like you're 5.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  2. Is it for children ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I clicked the link and visited the site. It looks like it was designed for Barney fans.

  3. Awesome by CrashNBrn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We need something better than Usenet... Oh wait, nothing has been better than usenet, as not a single damned "service" allows you to easily filter information.

    1. Re:Awesome by ottawanker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because porn is better when it has been uuencoded, just like records sound better than CDs.

  4. Only good news!! by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reminds me of a newspaper startup back in the 80's(?) called Good News, that only printed uplifting and cheerful stories. Needless to say that experiment didn't last long.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Only good news!! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reminds me of a newspaper startup back in the 80's(?) called Good News, that only printed uplifting and cheerful stories. Needless to say that experiment didn't last long.

      Both editions are now collector's items.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  5. Re:I'm all for it, but.. by dadelbunts · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh no no. I guarantee you it will still have the internet hate machine elements, just for "acceptable" topics such as all white people being racist and how REAL women are all superobese.

  6. Can someone from that site answer a quick question by Iamthecheese · · Score: 3, Funny

    I understand the value of a place like this. A positive, clean environment where I can feel safe. I'm tired of the harassment and constant fighting I see in other sites. I can't wait to join. I just have a quick question. The lobotomy, does it come free with membership or do I have to pay separately?

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  7. Re:I'm all for it, but.. by Distan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It looks to me just to be "take what is killing reddit and amplify it", not an attempt to build a healthy reddit.

  8. Oh HELL no by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I went to the page, and my browser immediately started asking me for "permission to send me notifications", ala "in-browser nagging and begging".

    Instant turn off. Jesus fucking christ, can't you even wait until someone joins before starting to pester the shit out of them??

    Also, alll the stuff about "healthy, positive communities" sounds like codespeak for "SJW's run this place". As if Reddit wasn't already infested with all the "safe space" and "triggering" and "micro-aggression" bullshit, this looks to be built for SJW's from the ground up.

    Yeah, umm thanks, but I'll pass on this.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Oh HELL no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't even mention the acronym SJW without a gaggle of the crybabies coming out of the woodwork to call you a meanie it seems.

  9. Re:I'm all for it, but.. by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

    A social media platform that excludes the hate machine element? ....

    That's a pretty fancy way of saying "the people who disagree with me, and I can't handle competing opinions or even facts at times." Just remember that there's an entire group of people out there that believe facts are harassment, if you need shining examples all you need to do is go look at the batshit crazy on tumblr. But that constructive criticism? Those same batshit crazy people, especially those that the media like to parrot will simply believe that criticism is harassment, or sexist, or racist or simply misogyny. They don't want facts, opinions that are contrary to their feelings.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  10. Re:I'm all for it, but.. by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I give him points for thinking outside the box and attempting to monetize 'the crazy'. If he can draw them all, the rest of the web will thank him.

    Think about the % that 'gofundme' and other spamhandling/begging web sites get, just for being a virtual highway on-ramp. This is that, plus mod bombing for pennies/downmod. All he needs to do is implement 'peak mod pricing', for when the pissing contests get heavy and he's richer than the pope.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  11. I don't get reddit by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it looks like someone used craigslist css to for a forum and tried to make it seems like Usenet?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  12. Re:What is harrassment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course you don't have know that you're harassing someone to harass them.

    The legal definition of harassment is repeated undesired contact with the intent to cause (psychological) trauma. If you are told to stop calling them, and you don't, then you know you're "harassing".

    However, the claims of psychological trauma are so over inflated today that SJWs say they get PTSD from Twitter -- Even though Twitter has a block function, and the service must be interacted with by the user via their choice. It's not like people can tweet @you unless you actually go to twitter, unlike a phone where anyone in the world can call and cause your phone to ring repeatedly. The problem is that "harassment" is claimed over things that you can close your eyes to make disappear. Some claim that certain people are very sensitive and get their PTSD "triggered" by certain phrases they read. If they know they are this psychologically damaged and yet willfully engage in risky behavior, such as reading a book, then they should seek help, not punishments for those who wrote words that offended them.

    Imagine if history teachers had to provide "trigger warnings" and allow black students not to have to learn about slavery because it triggers the manifestation of their ancestral PTSD in their own minds. This actually is a thing. Some professors are catching flack for refusing to put trigger warnings on history... These type of "hypersensitive" people are mentally ill, and should be in an asylum (provided they're not faking for elevated victim status, which they are). Should we make the entire world a padded cell just because there are a few crazies about? If reading a book could "trigger" you, then you should know better than to be on Twitter or the Internet in general -- It's not the author's fault.

    No one is responsible for what goes on in your head but you. If you can't be held responsible for the thoughts you think, then how can you hold anyone else responsible? If you wish to punish others for your own actions, such as thinking certain things, then you are legitimately insane, IMO.

  13. Re:I'm all for it, but.. by Tukz · · Score: 4, Funny

    tits or gtfo, newfag!

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -