Slashdot Mirror


India Makes It Compulsory For Phones To Have a 'Panic Button' (cio.com)

Reader itwbennett writes: Starting in January 2017, all feature phones sold in India will need to have a panic button that will alert "police, designated friends and relatives, for immediate response in case of distress or security related issues," said Minister of Communications, Ravi Shankar Prasad, on Twitter late Tuesday. The measure is one of many responses by the Indian government to the growing women safety issues in the country. Furthermore, starting in January 2018, mobile phones will also be required to have GPS systems to help pinpoint the location of the affected person in the event of harassment or distress, said Prasad.Mashable has more details.

96 comments

  1. False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many butt-dialed panics will that generate per day per square mile?

    1. Re:False alarms? by danbob999 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have an idea, to avoid false alarms, we could require 2 more buttons instead of just one. The user would need to press once on a button and twice on the other.

    2. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... From the article.

      "Under the new rules that come into effect in January 2017, all feature phones will need to have a panic button configured to the numeric key 5 or 9 and all smartphones will have the panic button linked to three short presses of the on-off button, according to the country's Department of Communications."

    3. Re:False alarms? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      My phone has a 12 letters unlock code ...
      I think you can call police without unlocking it, don't have it at hand yet.
      But last time I called the police, I simply forgot that ... had to nock put the attacker with my iPhone 4 first. Has a perfect size and fits perfectly into the hand for that.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:False alarms? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I have an idea, to avoid false alarms, we could require 2 more buttons instead of just one.

      Years of doing end-user support has taught me that pressing two buttons at the same time is difficult for some people to do. And that's not even people in an emergency situation.

    5. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "all smartphones will have the panic button linked to three short presses of the on-off button,"

      Are they trying to have as many false alarms as possible?

    6. Re:False alarms? by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed it in the article but I'm wondering what is this supposed to do send an sms or some kind of ws call with the GPS coordinates that goes to a "call back" call center or something? Does it just initiate a regular call to the local 911 equivalent in India?

    7. Re:False alarms? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I'm wondering what the problem with women in India is...?

      Are all the guys over there just publicly all feeling up the women as they walk by them or something?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:False alarms? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most of India lives in very tight quarters, if you think cities like New York and Tokyo are cramped then Dehli would shock you. Also they select children with a preference for boys over girls (not to Chinese degree, but it still is certainly a 'thing'), with boys in a often superior cultural role over girls. Combine these two and it's no surprise some boys can't keep their hands to themselves. I bet many feel safely anonymous most of the time. They also have a culture social class structure to make this all the worse.

      So I'm not terribly surprised that this combination has lead to severe issues.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    9. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's actually that they have a problem with wealthy families that have sons who are having hard time getting a wife kidnapping women and coercing them into marrying their son.

    10. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like in most of the 3rd world, women there are second-class property, to be groped and otherwise used as men fancy.

    11. Re:False alarms? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    12. Re:False alarms? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Not at the same time, in sequence.

    13. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Galaxy S7 already has this. I've only ever activated it accidently once while trying to adjust music volume in my pocket. Luckily enough, you can configure who it gets sent to still.

    14. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Galaxy S7 has this as an option that can be enabled. It sends ans SMS "help" message, photos from the cameras, audio recording, and GPS coordinates to the contacts you specify. 3 presses of the power button.

    15. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I get it... press a button once, then another button twice, and it will call emergency services. Kind of like 9 1 1
         

    16. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could take the idea to its completion by requiring the distressed to text Ctrl+Alt+Del to the local Police Constable.

    17. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a video link to the field testing of their panic button feature.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGOgJXFpgxs

    18. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a video of one of the field tests they ran:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGOgJXFpgxs

    19. Re:False alarms? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Years of doing end-user support has taught me that pressing two buttons at the same time is difficult for some people to do. And that's not even people in an emergency situation.

      Years of being a sysadmin has taught me that some people should not be saved.

    20. Re:False alarms? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "I have an idea, to avoid false alarms, we could require 2 more buttons instead of just one."

      And we could make the code reminiscent of a well-known enemy attack. I'm headed to East Texas right now to patent this.

    21. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually India's sex ratio is exactly the same as China's. Probably is going to get worse, because at least in China, most urban areas don't really care as much anymore.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_sex_ratio

    22. Re:False alarms? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I just re-read your comment. Well done, mate!
      Totally flew over my head what you were saying.

    23. Re:False alarms? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Actually if you look at the numbers on that wiki page, it shows the CIA figures the rate to be about the same. However, the rate under 15 is lower in India as is the WDB estimate. On the other hand India didn't have the purges China did during the last century or a one child per family policy, so the Indian trend is more static until the age when people tend to start dying off. This line sup pretty well from what I've heard form both Indians and Chinese people I've known.

      India, at least in the bigger cities, is starting to trend toward more acceptance of women and so are less extreme than a significant portion of China. They usually at least don't outright kill girls when they are born or sell them into slavery. Instead they just aren't treated all that well. Sometimes this can get pretty extreme in the 'not treated well' category like being sold at or near the legal marriage age to (typically) older men as wives. Since parents are usually expected to provide a dowry (or 'marriage price') to the husbands family, selling a child into marriage is often seen as a better option (and no one asks the girl what she wants). All of this is usually at the lower levels of their caste system however.

      In China parents don't ask their kids 'when are you going to provide us with grand children?', they ask 'when are you going to provide us with a grandson?'. In the countryside they are actively known to kill female children or sell them off shortly after birth and claim they died. This lets them skirt around the 'one child' policy and try again. What makes that hilarious is that on the other end of the scale their are so few Chinese girls that they actively have family who buy them a bride from another country because 'it's better to marry a foreigner than to have no legacy'.

      By no means are either countries that seem to understand the value of women, but the degree is different.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    24. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The country that gave us the Kama Sutra is also very socially conservative. Look for instance how much trouble Richard Gere got in to for publicly kissing Shilpa Shetty. A sexually charged culture where this has to repressed...

      Then of course there's the level of education of the masses in India. You won't see poverty on an India has elsewhere either.

    25. Re:False alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've set three power button presses on my phone to turn on the flashlight and I tend to activate that a lot accidentally.

    26. Re:False alarms? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      So if each person in India only accidentally activates it once, that's a billion false alarms. I'd imagine that has costs.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    27. Re:False alarms? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      With a name like that, you should be careful in Texas!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. False alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops. It accidentally went off.

  3. Hardware or software? by afidel · · Score: 1, Informative

    If they are allowed to use software it's no different from the US requirements which require access to 911 without an unlock code and the E911 requirement (which is such incredible BS, even last year when calling 911 from my phone the operator still asked me my location and city, I was calling in to report black ice on a state route in a city I'm not familiar with, I wasn't sure exactly which jurisdiction I was in, the freaking phone is REQUIRED to give them lat and longitude, it should have come up on their screen before they even picked up my call ffs)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Hardware or software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why ask questions that are answered in the fucking article?

    2. Re:Hardware or software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive my ignorance, but black ice is a 911-able emergency?

    3. Re:Hardware or software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you actually bothered to use your brain, rather than just ranting, you'd know that GPS on phones can flake out and give false reading sometimes. It costs half a second to ask the question, and that way they at least know that the results are plausible!

    4. Re:Hardware or software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't understand E911 - the PSAP operator will see the phase one information tower - location and sector - when you call. The phone originated GPS location may not even be available until 30 seconds after you START the call (or never depending on a number of factors) To call it BS is ignorant and unhelpful.

    5. Re:Hardware or software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTA:
      Under the new rules that come into effect in January 2017, all feature phones will need to have a panic button configured to the numeric key 5 or 9 and all smartphones will have the panic button linked to three short presses of the on-off button, according to the country's Department of Communications.

      Seems like software's the only thing that needs to change here, unless your phone doesn't have an on-off button managed by software

    6. Re:Hardware or software? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 0

      Well that's odd. When I call the California Highway Patrol to report hazards on the freeway, they always seem to know which freeway I'm on before I tell them.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    7. Re:Hardware or software? by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      all smartphones will have the panic button linked to three short presses of the on-off button

      Heh. My phone (and I think all phones with Android Marshmallow or later?) opens the camera app with a double-press of the on-off button. I guess Indian manufacturers will need to remove that shortcut.

    8. Re:Hardware or software? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      What's even more weird, when I called on the call box on the side of the highway because Google navigator had totally screwed up and was giving me half-hour old data, I had to tell the person I was talking to where I was. He told me to tell him the numbers listed on the box (at night with no street lights, naturally). How could they not even know what box I was calling from? So, they know exactly where you are if you call from a cell phone, but not from a call box? Seems like they should just put cell phones in the call boxes then!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    9. Re:Hardware or software? by afidel · · Score: 0

      Yes, when there are three cars in the ditch in the stretch of 2 miles and people are sliding into oncoming traffic you need the authorities to close down the road until it can be properly treated.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:Hardware or software? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      when calling 911 from my phone the operator still asked me my location and city, I was calling in to report black ice on a state route in a city I'm not familiar with

      You called 911 to report black ice? Is that a thing in the USA?

    11. Re: Hardware or software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it makes gps a requirement.

      "feature phone" is a fancy term for dumbphones selling for 10-20 bucks

    12. Re:Hardware or software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all smartphones will have the panic button linked to three short presses of the on-off button

      Heh. My phone (and I think all phones with Android Marshmallow or later?) opens the camera app with a double-press of the on-off button. I guess Indian manufacturers will need to remove that shortcut.

      I think that's a feature specific to Samsung phones.

    13. Re:Hardware or software? by afidel · · Score: 1

      When there are 3 cars in the ditch in a few miles and many cars sliding into the oncoming lane and the state route needs to be closed for safety, yes.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  4. ...ok? So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure why this is news. When I was in South Korea, the phones, whether feature or smart, had an entire list of emergency contacts accessible without needing to unlock the phone, including police and fire departments. (Also, peculiarly... suspected espionage. Always did wonder where that routed to.)

    Frankly, it might be more interesting to wonder why something similar isn't a standard feature on *all* mobile phones, everywhere in the world.

  5. unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only men can afford phones...

    1. Re:unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only men are allowed to have phones:
      http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/02/india-banning-women-owning-mobile-phones-160226120014162.html

    2. Re:unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a great place to have make all our stuff for us now that Chinese labor is too expensive. Quick; pass TPP before we have to increase our iPhone replacement interval from 12 to 18 months.

    3. Re:unfortunately... by PPH · · Score: 1

      And this is just one symptom of their problems. Their federal gov't recognizes the problems and takes measures (well thought out or not) to solve them. But the backward locals just block progress.

      It's time for the feds to take the local officials who thought up this ban, demote them to Dalits, hand them buckets and shovels and put them in charge of cleaning out the outhouses.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  6. All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it be anything like the Emergency Dialer on my Android lock screen? Oh, how I love to accidentally tap that. I just can't wait for the day I accidentally dial 911 while walking and have the cops come and shoot my dog. I'm so glad I can't disable it!

    1. Re:All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To "accidentally" dial 911 on and Android phone (assuming that the phone is in your pocket or otherwise "not in use"), you'd have to:

      1- Accidentally turn the screen on
      2- Accidentally hit the "Emergency call" button (in my version, which is based on Cyanogenmod, I even need to accidentally slide my finger up first to reveal the emergency call button)
      3- Accidentally hit the number 9, the number 1 and the number 1 again. Notice that they are at exact opposite extremes of the screen.

      That's a lot of accidents. 1 and 2 can plausibly happen, but is unlikely that anyone would press two directly opposed buttons in a specific order by accident.

      But with regards to your inability to disable this feature, well, I hear that Android is open-source. It shouldn't be too hard to rectify the situation.

      (You might not even have to because, IIRC, you can replace the lockscreen, and there should be a bunch of suitable ones available).

    2. Re:All right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on Cyanogen with Lollipop. While walking and listening to music, 1 and 2 happen to me frequently.

      It's open source so I can change it? When will people stop saying this stupid shit?

      I looked at several lock screens and I was unable to find any that actually locked the screen completely. They all had so many features that I was left wondering if people understood what a lock screen is actually for.

      You sound like a developer. The problem is my fault, huh?

  7. Meanwhile in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile Target has spearheaded shared bathrooms and changing areas. So this would be useful in the US, when our 14 year old girl is targeted by a predator in a nonpublic area.

  8. A BillIon People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since India has ONE BILLION PEOPLES, everyone's fone will haves this PANIC button...????

    1. Re:A BillIon People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they fuck so much? Can Indian lady close her legs???????

  9. Re:Meanwhile in the US, Colorado, South Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is not a real place, dude. Even Canada wouldn't do that.

  10. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to hear about 99.99% of the panic button usage to be false alarms.

  11. Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What good is a panic button if there's no one to help you fend off the attackers and they have no fear of getting caught?

  12. growing women safety issues ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no growing women safety issues.
    There is growing international (and national) awareness to the general un safety/danger for women.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:growing women safety issues ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ... you mean fully-grown women are still in danger? And I thought the risk was only to growing women.

    2. Re:growing women safety issues ... by tomhath · · Score: 2

      You just outdid GP in terms of the most-boring-pedantic-comment-of-the-year. But GP is correct, there is a growing awareness and concern; the issue itself has been a big problem for a long time.

    3. Re:growing women safety issues ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to lay off the hamburgers.

    4. Re:growing women safety issues ... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Yes. In fact, it might be argued that the actual safety issues are reducing or set to reduce because of the growing awareness and measures like this panic button thing.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  13. "the growing women safety issues" - LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that be "Indian men"? Because it sure as hell isn't the weather, or wild animals. It's INDIAN MEN who are the problem, isn't it. Because India is a hellhole - because it's full of INDIANS.

    Yet apparently, white people who object to these SCUM invading our countries are 'heretics' and 'bad people', according to the Jew owned media. And since most people on Slashdot get their moral compass from the TELEVISION, I'm sure you'll say I'm a 'bad person' too, for daring to suggest that white people have their own countries. Wouldn't that be just awful! All the non-whites will have to live in their own countries - which you obviously believe are WORSE than white countries, otherwise you wouldn't be bothered about them living there, and all the non-whites will have to live around THEIR OWN KIND - which you obviously believe are WORSE than white people, otherwise you wouldn't be bothered about them having to live with them... LOL.

  14. Larger red button by stedlj · · Score: 1

    And it must say "Don't Panic"

  15. Quick! Change the subject! by ScentCone · · Score: 0

    Another attempt to legislate a technical solution to a cultural problem.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  16. Market Protection by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    India has been trying to support it's nascent cell phone manufacturing industry. They just told Apple no on selling Used phones there.

    A cynic would see this as a ploy to help the local industry, making a hardware button specific for a single market. For a local producers who only sell to India, the single market requirement isn't much of a handicap. To international companies this is more of an issue for supply chains and all.

    Of course this is not the reason, it's really to protect the women. Which is why they fully support cell phones for women because they cause rapes... wait...

  17. Moral agency of women by dumky2 · · Score: 1

    Presumably some phones or alternative devices offer such functionality (otherwise, that sounds like a good opportunity). So, if people choose devices that don't have such a button, then it is there choice, just as they choose to carry or not carry various other defense devices.

    --
    These comments are mine; I do not speak for my employer.
  18. Growing women safety issues by PPH · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Buy every woman a gun. A panic button isn't going to do them any good because many police there empathize with social conservatives who are doing most of the harassment. Cops either show up late or not at all. Prosecutors reflect the same attitudes and value the life of a male aggressor more than a female victim. So turn the tables on them. Either drag the scumbag men off the street and put them in 'protective custody' or bring the coroners wagon to the scene after a failed attack.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Growing women safety issues by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If every woman has a gun, every mugger and/or rapist has a gun, too.
      Problem solved. O R'elly?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Growing women safety issues by PPH · · Score: 1

      every mugger and/or rapist has a gun, too.

      India maintains firearms ban for (non law enforcement) men. Get caught with a gun as a man and risk being arrested and/or shot on sight.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Growing women safety issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's comforting.

      I'm sure they will all wear their guns proudly sticking out of their flies like a hard steel cock, just so they can be make sure that they are caught.

    4. Re:Growing women safety issues by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Oh, and woman are not "men" and may carry a gun?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Growing women safety issues by PPH · · Score: 1

      That would be my suggestion. But in reality it would never happen. Because men are 'worth' more than women and are protected by police and prosecutors.

      And not just men, but members of conservative groups. You don't hear about many instances where a woman is attacked and her male relatives go after, beat and/or kill her attacker. Because they are a protected elite in that country.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Growing women safety issues by Malc · · Score: 1

      I don't get how anybody can think guns are answer to any problem. Look at how fucked up the US is if you have any doubt about this.

    7. Re:Growing women safety issues by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Yes, because everybody will be dead.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  19. mod parent up please / Phones will be taken first. by gavron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He's informative and he's correct.

    Emergency calls in the NANPA areas are handled by PSAPs (public service answering points). Most are consolidated centers, like the one servicing all 12 of CenturyLink states.

    The operator is trained to take the call as soon as possible, and say "911; what is the emergency". *

    At that point the only thing they have for sure is your CLID and if there's a LIDB CNAM entry for it, that entry (Colloquially "Caller ID number and a name").
    It takes time for the system to also display any other information. Your cellular telephone's GPS is actually not used -- instead tower information is used. However, if you're out on a rural highway with sequential towers, you're likely only hitting one tower so all the operator can know is you're within an X-mile radius of some location. Note that "X miles" is approximated by using the round-trip-delay in the cellphone-to-tower communication and dividing by the speed of light.

    So that's E911. This new suggestion that Indian phones send out their coordinates supposes that the GPS/GLONASS is on all the time. If it isn't, it may need to acquire ephemeris data and that can take 30s-5m if the GPS has been recently used, and up to an hour if not. (These times vary depending on various factors too complex to get into here and not entirely relevant). The point being is that if you push the "PANIC" button and someone is attacking you, it is extremely likely they can take your phone and render it inoperative prior to it getting a GPS fix. (GLONASS ephemeris time to live is a one-byte field that counts how many 900-second intervals the data is valid. This allows their users more flexibility in not needing always-on devices.)

    That leaves the simple issue that if someone wants to perpetrate a crime in India then the FIRST THING they are going to do is take the phone away from the victim. So much for a panic button.

    Ehud

    * There was talk at some point of having the automated system say it and then put the operator on the line (thus saving on personnel costs) but they decided that oftentimes what the operator hears in the background while saying that is actually useful intel. Also in the event of a delay in putting an operator on the call, the caller hasn't already started talking.

  20. Now only if it was compulsory for the government.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now only if it was compulsory for the government to actually protect their people from criminals, thugs and rapists.

    This means actually hiring enough police, prosecutors, and making sufficient prison space for the criminals that are convicted.

    Now if it was compulsory for the government to enforce civil rights for everyone (and not just the cronies).

    Nope.

    But hey, they got that nice button!

  21. Re:mod parent up please / Phones will be taken fir by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    When I call 911 from the freeway it goes straight to the California Highway Patrol. They say "CHP, what are you reporting?"

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  22. Priorities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India... Where they still have half the population shitting in the streets.

  23. Growing women by Byzandula · · Score: 0

    I fail to see how a panic button will prevent women from growing. Perhaps it it is only needed for growing women with safety issues. Good luck India.

  24. Are they planning to let some muslim migrants in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Panic button?
    Are they planning to let some muslim migrants in?
    'Some' being several millions?
    Panic button would be useful against these rapefugees.

  25. Re:mod parent up please / Phones will be taken fir by willy_me · · Score: 2

    If it isn't, it may need to acquire ephemeris data and that can take 30s-5m if the GPS has been recently used, and up to an hour if not.

    Cell phones use assisted-GPS to improve the position acquisition speed. From the Wikipedia article:

    Standalone GPS provides first position in approximately 30–40 seconds. A standalone GPS needs orbital information of the satellites to calculate the current position. The data rate of the satellite signal is only 50 bit/s, so downloading orbital information like ephemerides and the almanac directly from satellites typically takes a long time, and if the satellite signals are lost during the acquisition of this information, it is discarded and the standalone system has to start from scratch. In A-GPS, the network operator deploys an A-GPS server. These A-GPS servers download the orbital information from the satellite and store it in the database. An A-GPS capable device can connect to these servers and download this information using mobile network radio bearers such as GSM, CDMA, WCDMA, LTE or even using other wireless radio bearers such as Wi-Fi. Usually the data rate of these bearers is high, hence downloading orbital information takes less time.

  26. Why a button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They should make it a panic switch instead. Women can toggle it on when they're in India and off if they visit civilization.

  27. In North America, we don't allow one button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some cell phones used to have one button emergency call features. The 9-1-1 Authorities persuaded the network operators to get rid of them: way, way too many false calls ("butt dial"). We want you to have to do multiple DIFFERENT button presses to call. They will figure it out eventually. If you build a device that has a one button emergency call feature, expect follow up from us to convince you to get rid of it. It's a bad idea.

    For that matter, so is the idea that you should be able to call 9-1-1 from a phone that doesn't have an active phone number ("non initialized"). That turns out to be a really really horrible idea that got baked into law. We process tens of thousands of bad calls, and most PSAPs have never had a good one.

  28. Yeah, how did so many not get the reference? by mpercy · · Score: 1

    Except for people in other countries where their emergency code is 999 or something else.

    1. Re:Yeah, how did so many not get the reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      0118999881999119725........ 3

    2. Re:Yeah, how did so many not get the reference? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      867-4309?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  29. What does that mean in English? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    phones will also be required to have GPS systems

    What does that mean? Are they requiring that the GPS always be on (and draining the battery)? Or will the required GPS be turned off to save power and thus no more useful than a phone without one? Perhaps what would be really nice is require the panic button to power on the GPS, but it takes time to get a GPS lock and even then is wasn't stated that this would be put in place.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  30. Tech ain't magic. by westlake · · Score: 1

    when calling 911 from my phone the operator still asked me my location and city, I was calling in to report black ice on a state route in a city I'm not familiar with, I wasn't sure exactly which jurisdiction I was in, the freaking phone is REQUIRED to give them lat and longitude, it should have come up on their screen before they even picked up my call

    In the real world, the dispatcher doesn't always get the information instantaneously and it isn't always that accurate. That is why she has to ask.

    Wireless network operators must provide the latitude and longitude of callers within 300 meters, within six minutes of a request by a PSAP

    Enhanced 9-1-1 [The law since 2012 in the US]

  31. Re:mod parent up please / Phones will be taken fir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are incorrect. There are over 6,000 PSAPs in the U.S. alone. "Consolidated" usually means one county. There no PSAP that serves even on state let alone one serving 12 states. In California, CHP handles calls from interstates across the state. That's about as close as you come. Even in Vermont, which has a completely state run system, there are several PSAPs that each serve their local area.

    In many PSAPs they say "9-1-1 where is your emergency?". The location they get when they first answer the call is a location related to the tower (and sometimes sector) the call is coming from, and they want to know exactly where you are. In some number of seconds, they can request your actual location, but even then, where you are may not be where the emergency is. You could be 10 miles down the highway from the crash. When they "rebid" for "Phase II location", they get GPS location in most cases. On some networks (ATT and T-Mobile), for some, mostly older phones, they get a location that is calculated from signals received at the towers rather than GPS, and both get you to 100-200 meters of where you are 90% or so of the time, IF you are outside. But if you are calling from inside, they may never get a Phase II location or it may be really inaccurate.

    They don't have CNAM. They only have phone number. For wireline calls, they get name and address of the subscriber, but not for wireless and usually not for VoIP. They don't actually get CLID, they get ANI. Usually that's the same, but not always.

    They don't ever get anything that is related to your "X-miles". Some PSAPs for some carriers have a nominal map of the sector you all calling from, but you aren't necessarily inside that map. There is a percentage "confidence" that you are within some uncertainty area. That has a regulatory limit for Phase II location. Phase I location, based on the cell and sector is a street address.

    There has never, to my knowledge been any serious discussion of using an automated attendant, although it might get used in the future if the system is overloaded and you are nth caller from within, say a mile of a known accident. The whole idea of 9-1-1 is that a real person answers the call and tries to help you.

  32. Tim Cook: Apple CEO Failure Extraordinary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple CEO Tim Cook's and Apple's Board plan to use India as a means to repatriate $300 billion in US currency by using "used iPhone resales" as "drug mules" was spotted by members of the DOJ and IRS.

    DOJ and DOS are now in the final stages of ordering a NO FLY INTERNAT order on Timothy Donald Cook (TDC), CEO Apple Inc. For sure, Timmy can't buy his way out or Queer his way out this time. Secret Service is also ramping up at airports around the Bay to apprehend TDC if he a "run rabbit run" by himself or with a hired actor as a decoy. TSA around the country have been alerted and given biometric data on TDC to spot him if he approaches.

    TDC is not "Jason Borne" and not by birth by a very long shot. He will be apprehended, arrested, arraigned of the charges, incarcerated and given his "day before the bench".

  33. Phone GPS is not necessarily reliable by SIGBUS · · Score: 1

    ...the US requirements which require access to 911 without an unlock code and the E911 requirement (which is such incredible BS, even last year when calling 911 from my phone the operator still asked me my location and city, I was calling in to report black ice on a state route in a city I'm not familiar with, I wasn't sure exactly which jurisdiction I was in, the freaking phone is REQUIRED to give them lat and longitude, it should have come up on their screen before they even picked up my call ffs)

    The phone I have has an especially wonky GPS, since they combined the GPS and NFC antennas and put them on the removable back. If the pins on the phone don't make absolutely perfect contact with the antenna, it will get a poor signal or no signal at all, and the location guesses tend to be downright laughable. Sometimes, its location data even gets "stuck" and my weather widget keeps reporting a faraway location I had been earlier. Indeed, after avoiding flagship phones for a long time, I'm ready to go ahead and pop for a G5, because I'm so pissed off at this phone's GPS performance.

    I'm not surprised the 911 operator asked for your location.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!