Slashdot Mirror


US Calls Switzerland An Internet Piracy Haven (torrentfreak.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Office of the United States Trade Representative has published its annual Special 301 Report calling out other nations for failing to live up to U.S. IP enforcement standards. This year European ally Switzerland has been placed on the Watch List for protecting file-sharers and playing host to many pirate sites. "Generally speaking, Switzerland broadly provides high-levels of IPR protection and enforcement in its territory. Switzerland makes important contributions to promoting such protection and enforcement internationally, including in bilateral and multilateral contexts, which are welcomed by the United States," the USTR writes in its assessment.

119 comments

  1. Is this something good or bad for switzerland by NotInHere · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is this something good for swiss business, or something bad?

    I mean tax havens are doing great as well.

    1. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good. It's only bad for Swiss business if the products pirated by the Swiss come directly from other Swiss people.
      But if they are pirating software from foreigners, then the money is obviously staying within the economy to be spent on more relevant resources that aren't capeshit movie #235, a Justin Bieber album, or another broken EA game that's 90% DLC.

    2. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depends on who you are. Personal rights always look bad to people in control. Just ask China. They call the US a heaven for improper speech.

    3. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright infringement is not your personal right.

    4. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by matbury · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they didn't mention child pornography, drug-trafficking, terrorism, and trade in human organs. Any mention of supporting people's rights to personal privacy and freedom from search a seizure immediately trigger this kind of rhetoric these days. It's become a worn-out media trope.

    5. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      You forgot sex trafficking. That's the latest one to get added to the list.

    6. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by Falos · · Score: 1

      Really? I didn't think we were all that oblivious to the fifty-cent club. I've seen it mix with other slurs for shills.

      Scorn and mockery make a lot of sense to be picked as control mechanism for astroturfing, mind.

    7. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither is assuming every other country wants your corporate funded erosion of copyright law.

    8. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Harmful speech is not your personal right.

      (my point: any personal right can be spun into a negative with clever wordplay).

    9. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      That's right you had BETTER post that libel anonymously, troll.

    10. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      It's OK. I have Karma to burn if I need to post unpopular truth. It is funny when you look at my post history... All the -1s are unpopular truths. :)

    11. Re:Is this something good or bad for switzerland by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Nor is insulting the monarchy. http://www.theguardian.com/wor...

      Unless you live in the US, where you can insult the monarchy. And in Switzerland, you can share copyrighted works.

  2. What... by EmeraldBot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, because they refused to bow down and enforce the US's laws in their territory? That's worthy of being placed on an international watchlist now - at the same level as Russia and China, no less?

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    1. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The world in general needs to grow a pair and tell the corporate-owned-US-government to go fuck itself to death.

    2. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes - we un-elected the Surfette from the federal council, she was the one who basically sold out our country to the US...

    3. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The main and foremost export of the USA is entertainment. Movies, music, and arguably video games. But emphasis on movies, television, and music.
      Given it's their 1st and biggest income revenue, it makes sense that they are fanatically obsessed with it.

      Of course, since the US government has done a great job indeed of alienating most of the planet, including its former allies who are now allies on paper only,
      in addition to the aforementioned movie and music industries being so fucking shit these days,
      the only thing they are achieving by trying to subvert the justice system of foreign sovereign nations to benefit only US in the long term is to become even more hated.
      Nationalism (or "Patriotism as Americans like to call it) is on the rise again (even if kept quiet) and people ain't so adamant on paying some foreign Americans anymore (which is a good way to silently "protest").

    4. Re:What... by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The world in general needs to grow a pair and tell the corporate-owned-US-government to go fuck itself to death.

      So do US voters. And I think they are finally trying. It may not work this cycle, but when change still fails it will piss off a LOT of people.

    5. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... and the torches and pitchforks come out?

    6. Re: What... by slazzy · · Score: 1

      There definitely needs to be a balance between personal rights and corporate rights. In the US, I think almost everyone would agree the balance has swung too far in favour of large corporations, and away from personal rights and those of small business.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    7. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually believe that will ever happen, I have a bridge for sale that you might be interested in.

    8. Re: What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, the U.S. Trade Representative--constantly acting against the wishes of the American people in favor of multinational corporations as always.

    9. Re: What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There definitely needs to be a balance between personal rights and corporate rights.

      Why?

      What is the reason you think corporations should have any rights at all? Is it not sufficient that the persons involved have their rights.
      Why do corporations need extra rights on top of that?

    10. Re: What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the balance should be 100% personal rights and 0% corporate rights. corporations are made of people, they are not people there fore they deserve no rights. if people have all the rights then no corporation would survive that doesn't support the people.

      when people say corporate rights, they mean a different set of rules for the people who own/run the business. Understand what you are saying when you say corporations need rights because they don't! every person should have the same rights, from the janitor to the investor.

    11. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada does this for the most part. They've been on the Special 301 report for years, and their general response is 'tough shit'.

    12. Re:What... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 0

      What, because they refused to bow down and enforce the US's laws in their territory?

      Keep in mind that EU countries do that all the time to the USA. The US is certainly not alone in that. The EU's "right to be forgotten", which as is typical for many EU countries is a bit of feeling sorry for poor criminals, has been said by several EU courts to apply everywhere in the world. For example, Google can't just restrict searches that originate in Germany from finding results where some applicant has applied for a crime to be "forgotten" in Germany, the EU courts don't want any Google search anywhere in the world to return the results. I'm sure that there are cases where China and other major countries have tried to insist that the US follow their local laws too. This is certainly not something that only the US does, although the US may well whine about it more than anybody else does.

    13. Re:What... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Yes, they should that is the right thing for their people and governments to try to do.

      I would argue its also the right thing for our government to try to secure 'a good deal' for American's and American business where it can be hand.

      I am totally in support of mercantilism as a foreign policy; I just want to combine it with a laissez-faire capitalist low tax system of benign neglect as a domestic policy.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    14. Re: What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gays, I get. But "Mom, dad, I have something to tell you... I'm black." ?

    15. Re: What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause we all want free stuff.

    16. Re: What... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      What is the reason you think corporations should have any rights at all? Is it not sufficient that the persons involved have their rights.
      Why do corporations need extra rights on top of that?

      Well, to be fair there are a few rights that a corporation needs:

      * the right to construct and enforce contracts (the latter meaning enforcement via civil tort).
      * the right to some basic protection from crime by way of access to the police and recognition as a victim (e.g. burglaries, embezzlement, fraud, etc).

      There are of course others, but these two immediately came to mind.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    17. Re: What... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Understand what you are saying when you say corporations need rights because they don't! every person should have the same rights, from the janitor to the investor.

      So if some entity renegs on a contract with a corporation, who sues the guy? Does he pay it all out-of-pocket and get reimbursed by the company later? What about if a company itself does something lawsuit-worthy - who do *you* sue... the CEO personally?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    18. Re: What... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      they are not people there fore they deserve no rights

      That's stupid. My dog isn't people either and it at least has minimal rights to not be tortured and such.

      That said, if my dog bites a kid, the kid's right to personal safety far outstrips my dog's right to life and it gets put down. If a company dumps a shitload of lead into that same kid's water supply though (hello, Flint,) they get a slap on the wrist and asked not to do it again.

      "Think about the children!" is certainly a powerful (if super over/abused) argument but "Think about the profit!" trumps even that. And that's the real problem.

      It isn't that companies have rights. Companies need rights -- at least enough to protect them from other companies. Its that we currently value their rights more than we value our personal rights (or at least our policymakers do.)

    19. Re:What... by mattventura · · Score: 2

      Not even close. From 2015 statistics, royalties and licensing was $128B out of $2.23T, and that includes software. Even cars are a bigger export than royalties.

    20. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the USA, I would advise you not to bring a pitchfork to a gun fight (unless the cops brought muzzle loaders).

    21. Re: What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. But the same applies to the government, which too is made up of people.

      100% personal rights, 0% corporate rights, and 0% state rights. Straight up, uncompromising libertarianism.

    22. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The world in general needs to grow a pair and tell the corporate-owned-US-government to go fuck itself to death.
      > So do US voters. And I think they are finally trying. It may not work this cycle, but when change still fails it will piss off a LOT of people.

      Is that why people are voting for Hillary & Trump, to send that message?

    23. Re: What... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Wait until they find out that the EFF, ACLU, Linux Foundation, FSF, and the BSD one (whose name escapes me right now) are all corporations.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    24. Re:What... by Evtim · · Score: 1

      We can only hope. But Merkel recently defended the new super secret [and it seems rather sleazy, why else it is so secret] trade agreement between EU and US. Most of Europe is up in arms [strange that media in US does not seem to give this the attention it deserves].

      I think this issue will be a very good test. Let's see what will happen.

    25. Re: What... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      What about if a company itself does something lawsuit-worthy - who do *you* sue... the CEO personally?

      Exactly. If you are run down by a car because the driver was snorting coke from the dashboard, would you sue the car?

    26. Re: What... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Please stop with the Greengrocers' Apostrophe's (sic).
      Please note that this is an act of self-preservation - each time I see this it hurts - please stop :o)

    27. Re: What... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      "American's" in this case own the "good deal"

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    28. Re:What... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Trump, and Bernie, and Cruiz, yes. All are very anti-establishment. All establishment Republicans were decimated early. Hillery is ahead on gaming the system more then votes, and people are noticing.

    29. Re: What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are so many cases which go both ways. However, they should be treated similarly in all cases. Not have a choice of how they want to be treated dependant on what has the most advantages.

    30. Re: What... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      "I would argue its also the right thing for our government to try to secure 'a good deal' for Americans and American business where it can be hand."

      They can still own the good deal without Greengrocers' apostrophes :P

    31. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or more people see the value of the 2nd Amendment...

    32. Re:What... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Metaphorically yes, but remember, we still have our guns.

    33. Re:What... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      You are confusing sales figures with profit figures.
      The profit margin on a car is only a few percent where the profit margin on royalties and licensing is almost 100%

    34. Re:What... by chrish · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Canada, we've been on the USTR's list of evildoers for ages.

      --
      - chrish
  3. Or, you know, privacy that really means something by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yup. Just moved all my personal stuff to hostpoint.ch.

    They give you free SSL, ssh access, and they need a warrant before they'll release anything, *and* they'll tell you if a warrant has been issued.

    I've got nothing to hide. My life is disturbingly normal and boring, but it's the principle of the thing. I don't think government should rifle through every piece of my postal mail, and I don't think they should do the same to my email / digital data either.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  4. Good for them by shaitand · · Score: 2

    That's all.

  5. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You are now a target.

  6. Beginning of the wrong kinda beautiful friendship by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Swiss and Slashdotters: We are shocked. Shocked!

    Bittorrent: Your files, sir.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  7. And how we should call the US..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporate heaven?

    1. Re:And how we should call the US..? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Corporate heaven?

      Lackeys, not heaven...

  8. AAAARRRR!!! by nanodec · · Score: 1

    Ok... couldn't resist... =D

  9. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm not a natural born citizen. I've *always* been a target. First thing they did was treat me like a criminal and force me to give them my fingerprints if I wanted a green card...

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  10. Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The days of making money on copies of music and movies is over. Fight it all you like, reality isn't going to change.

    1. Re:Over by neminem · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      The days of execs making money on *other* peoples' music are definitely disappearing fast, cause screw that. The days of actual artists making money on their *own* music are just getting started.

  11. And there's nothing much wrong with piracy by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 2

    Having information available to the masses is a good thing. It is like we have a giant library. If your media is really worth money, giving it to the masses is like adding trillions into the economy all at once. You just need new business models to create stuff. I'm looking in the direction of kickstarter.

    1. Re:And there's nothing much wrong with piracy by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Except that's not how they measure economics. I mean you could argue that it should be, but its not. They measure economics by the amount of money that changes hands, not by the amount of goods that change hands. No money = no economic gain. Quality of life isn't part of the equation.

  12. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    Could you imagine having a job going through everyones internet traffic mostly ads peppered with lolcats, facebook, and candy crush.

  13. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm not a natural born citizen

    and I, for one, welcome our synthe-sapien overlords.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  14. Government or the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The title is misleading. "US calls "Switzerland..." implies "US population calls Swiss population...", which we all know didn't happen. The correct title of this article is "US government calls Swiss government..."

    That is, unless you actually believe in the fairy tale that government and the people are one and the same.

    1. Re:Government or the people? by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, Hollywood insiders tell bought and paid for US government spokes people to call Switzerland...

    2. Re:Government or the people? by Archtech · · Score: 2

      That is, unless you actually believe in the fairy tale that government and the people are one and the same.

      Well, I believe that one originated with the US... er... government.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    3. Re:Government or the people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The title is misleading. "US calls "Switzerland..." implies "US population calls Swiss population...", which we all know didn't happen. The correct title of this article is "US government calls Swiss government..."

      That is, unless you actually believe in the fairy tale that government and the people are one and the same.

      This is splitting hairs. The US governement is the legitimate representative of the will of the citizens of the US.
      The fact that most US citizens don't give a shit about voting (and no coming once every 4 years out the woods to choose a president doesn't mean you're engaged in the political process) is your problem. Maybe civic duty has to taught again in schools ? I'm amazed at how superficially patriotic most Americans are (the pledge of allegiance, the national anthem being played everywhere, the narrative about all men in uniform being "heroes" and therefore untouchable etc...) and then when it comes to the real things that matter, casting votes in local elections, elections to select senators, congressmen/women most citizens don't give a shit. And you end up with crazies controlling the strings. Another paradox of the oh so great country, land of the free and home of brave.

    4. Re: Government or the people? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Legitimate according to a set of rules invented by the very people benefiting from the application of those rules. Hmmmn. I'm sure that's beyond suspicion.

  15. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your status has been elevated to Bullseye!

  16. Re:Makes me wish I spoke Swedish by NotInHere · · Score: 1

    Switzerland isn't Sweden as much as Indiana isn't India.

  17. Well if your country is on some US list by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Informative

    its means they are afraid of the extra freedom/rights your country affords you. That also means they are trying to take away those freedoms, like they took away from their own citizens. Best to just ignore them and let them squawk.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  18. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    You are now a target.

    These days, if you are not a target, you really can not be trusted.

  19. From Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Welcome Switzerland, we were getting lonely and will enjoy the company on this prestigious list. We have been on it for years now and if our politicians would listen to the people they represent we would be much higher on the ranking.

    FFS, the list pretty much says that the countries on the list wont completely bend over for the US. I think its time Canada reminds the US what happened in 1812, the last time they tried to invade our country.. its the same thing now, except the US is doing it through trade, I welcome anyone from the US to come visit and see how many sh!ts we give and if your all butt hurt about it you have my condolences. at least if we get butt hurt we can go to a doctor and get it checked out for free.

    1. Re:From Canada by danbob999 · · Score: 1, Troll

      1812 wasn't a war involving Canada-as-a-country, since it wasn't even a country back then.
      It was a war between the US and the UK. The people of Canada lost, having to remain loyal subjects of a foreign crown. Canada is lucky not to have turned that bad over the years, but back then it was still a big loss for Canada, just like if the US lost its independence war.

    2. Re:From Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1812 wasn't a war involving Canada-as-a-country, since it wasn't even a country back then.
      It was a war between the US and the UK. The people of Canada lost, having to remain loyal subjects of a foreign crown. Canada is lucky not to have turned that bad over the years, but back then it was still a big loss for Canada, just like if the US lost its independence war.

      Lol, Canada wasn't a country back then, but neither was the US. You were just a collection of loose colonies or that fact isn't taught in school anymore ? As for the people of Canada having lost, Jesus man the colonists up north didn't want regime change. That's why they sided with the crown and beat you up. They couldn't give a rat's ass about your revolutionary ideals.

      The motto of the US should be : We've been in the regime change business, since 1777.
      Seems nothing has changed since then eh ? Born bullies, always bullies.

    3. Re:From Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US hadn't been colonies for decades by 1812. You retarted?

    4. Re:From Canada by EmeraldBot · · Score: 2

      1812 wasn't a war involving Canada-as-a-country, since it wasn't even a country back then. It was a war between the US and the UK. The people of Canada lost, having to remain loyal subjects of a foreign crown. Canada is lucky not to have turned that bad over the years, but back then it was still a big loss for Canada, just like if the US lost its independence war.

      Lol, Canada wasn't a country back then, but neither was the US. You were just a collection of loose colonies or that fact isn't taught in school anymore ? As for the people of Canada having lost, Jesus man the colonists up north didn't want regime change. That's why they sided with the crown and beat you up. They couldn't give a rat's ass about your revolutionary ideals.

      The motto of the US should be : We've been in the regime change business, since 1777. Seems nothing has changed since then eh ? Born bullies, always bullies.

      You failed to understand his point. There was no "Canada" - there were British settlers who lived north of the United States. When the US rebelled, they came up with a new name and established themselves as an independant country, which the world eventually recognized. Canada at the time was simply unclaimed land and didn't become a country for many years later. Your argument makes about as much sense as saying the United States teamed up with England to fight the French in the colonial wars. It makes no sense because the United States didn't exist at the time, they were just British subjects, and the same goes for Canada at that time. Also, might I point out something? You irrationally assume every American is aggressive and bullying, you assume this list was drafted by every citizen of the United States, and you display a sense of nationalism far greater than mine. I have met many Canadians and on the whole found them to be friendly, polite, and pretty well educated. You, however, are the exception to this - you don't see the irony in accusing Americans of being xenophobic when you're the one who started this, you have no sense of class to deliver your argument professionally, and your best attack is a pathetic barb on a healthcare system you clearly don't understand (in fact, you don't even understand your own.)

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    5. Re:From Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except the US is doing it through trade

      MOD UP , this is exactly whats happening. TTIP , etc anyone? This is exactly how the British empire died.

    6. Re:From Canada by armanox · · Score: 1

      I think you have your years a little bit off - the United States pulled itself together long before the war of 1812. Prior to 1789 I could accept part of your argument (the Articles of Confederation had such a weak federal government it was pretty powerless), but we had the Constitution was ratified in by 1789, we elected General Washington to the Presidency, and the First Congress was in session. Perhaps you should review early American history?

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    7. Re:From Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume that the poster that you're replying to is Canadian?

  20. Heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracy Heaven

    1. Re:Heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. Hey US mind your own business by greatpatton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People in Switzerland start to be really annoyed by the US behavior. More and more people now consider the US as a big bully. No surprise that more and more people even in Switzerland start to see Russia and China as valid partners (Switzerland even signed a free trade agreement with China). A quick example, the US forced Switzerland to automatically provide information on bank account but at the same is refusing to do the same. Regarding IP laws, any change will be fought by the people and it is certain that it will trigger a referendum. I think that the US will keep Switzerland on their black list for a very long time. Now it is no more a question of IP laws, it is a matter to oppose direct change of Swiss laws by a country that is less and less see a valid ally.

    1. Re:Hey US mind your own business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm very pleased to be bearing witness to the erosion of US dominance. I do hope the USD loses it's perceived "global reserve" status and we can all start benefitting from a much more decentralised world with much less bloodshed.

    2. Re:Hey US mind your own business by swb · · Score: 1

      A quick example, the US forced Switzerland to automatically provide information on bank account but at the same is refusing to do the same.

      Maybe they're not refusing, it's just that no Swiss citizens have decided that when depositing money in a highly secure private bank account, why screw around with the United States when you could just walk across the street. You know, to a Swiss bank...

    3. Re:Hey US mind your own business by jbr439 · · Score: 1

      A quick example, the US forced Switzerland to automatically provide information on bank account but at the same is refusing to do the same.

      Maybe they're not refusing, it's just that no Swiss citizens have decided that when depositing money in a highly secure private bank account, why screw around with the United States when you could just walk across the street. You know, to a Swiss bank...

      The US has forced (via threat of financial sanctions) FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) on numerous countries in order to obtain financial account information on US citizens. Meanwhile the US has so far refused to reciprocate in any meaningful way. The result is that for non-US citizens, the US is the best tax haven around (google "Delaware Nevada Wyoming tax havens").

      Meanwhile the US also refuses to sign up for the OECD CRS (Common Reporting Standard).

      So, the other guy is totally correct - the US is indeed being monumentally hypocritical when it comes to offshore tax evasion.

  22. Re:Makes me wish I spoke Swedish by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    Switzerland != Sweden

  23. as a swiss citicen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides they might be right:

    as a swiss citicen i call the" us and the a" an Internet Privacy Hell

  24. The Swiss, having been a Nazi Supporter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say it looks bad for the country. Hitler and his henchmen used the Swiss to stockpile all the stolen loot from W. W. II. It goes without saying, ...

    1. Re:The Swiss, having been a Nazi Supporter... by matbury · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wow, didn't take long for Godwin's law to be fulfilled this time. Yes, like all tax havens, the Swiss have provided secrecy and safe haven for the worst of humanity and continue to do so. That's along with Panama, Bermuda, Camen Islands, Jersey & Guernsey, etc. And that's where American billionaire's and corporations hide the fruits of their illegal and immoral activities too. You should check out Jane Mayer's book, "Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right" to see just how depraved it gets and US' involvement in the Nazi holocaust.

    2. Re:The Swiss, having been a Nazi Supporter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So you are saying to not condemn Those serial killers because there are Other serial killers doing the same? Bravo!

  25. US laws are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The whole ideology of 'intellectual property' proposed by the Americans is unwelcome in Europe. The Americans need to understand that we do not share their greedy 'IP' maximalist agenda, and that we don't want it here. We should place the United States on a corporate totalitarianism watch list, and tell their corporate rulers where to stick their backward laws. I'd like to see patents abolished, and the reach and term of copyright significantly reduced. I hope more forward thinking countries like China will not pander to US blackmail and bullying.

    1. Re:US laws are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "forward thinking countries like China". Now I've heard everything.

    2. Re:US laws are the problem by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      When you say "The Americans" you make it sound like the American people give a shit about this? No, a handful of corporations--that may or may not have an office in America and may or may not employ Americans--are the only ones who care about this and they've rented a few government Pit Bulls to sick on world.

    3. Re:US laws are the problem by Altrag · · Score: 2

      And you make it sound like that distinction even matters. Anyone with even remotely useful reading comprehension can understand that when an outsider says "America" or "the Americans," we mean "the people that dictate American foreign policy" and every single one of the 350million American citizens.

      Or do you believe that every single person in Utah is a Mormon? Or that every single person in California is a Democrat? Its just easier to apply a group label when the context is (or at least should be!) obvious than trying to list every relevant person, company, tree and dog individually, or even than having to write out "the officials and other players that control American foreign policy" in full over and over again.

    4. Re:US laws are the problem by Altrag · · Score: 1

      and _not_ every single one

      Wow how missing one little word can totally invert an argument!

    5. Re:US laws are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An American citizen has also received political asylum in Russia because he is not safe in America.

      You guys aren't the good guys any more!!!

  26. Re: Makes me wish I spoke Swedish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah you need to speak German, French or Italian.

  27. World Calls U.S. An Asshole Haven. by zenlessyank · · Score: 4, Funny

    News @ 11

    1. Re:World Calls U.S. An Asshole Haven. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      World Calls U.S. An Asshole Haven.

      Well, to be fair, we do have more assholes than all but two countries.... and that's without even counting Washington D.C.

  28. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Dude, we got treated like criminals as children, don't feel bad. We had a fingerprinting push when I was a kid, because "won't someone think of the children". Anyone who knows anything about the cops know that they dust for prints maybe 1% of the time that they might find some... no, sorry, way less than that. There is literally no chance whatsoever that this ever found a child. But they made sure to get us in their database...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. From Canada (copied under fair use!!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome Switzerland, we were getting lonely and will enjoy the company on this prestigious list. We have been on it for years now and if our politicians would listen to the people they represent we would be much higher on the ranking.

    FFS, the list pretty much says that the countries on the list wont completely bend over for the US. I think its time Canada reminds the US what happened in 1812, the last time they tried to invade our country.. its the same thing now, except the US is doing it through trade, I welcome anyone from the US to come visit and see how many sh!ts we give and if your all butt hurt about it you have my condolences. at least if we get butt hurt we can go to a doctor and get it checked out for free.

    Fair use rules!

  30. Re: Or, you know, privacy that really means someth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. If you're not in a watchlist you're a terrorist.

  31. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unexpectedly profound.

  32. Who are the REAL pirates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming from a government that tries to force citizens the buy healthcare insurance at high rates, and charges a fee for not having something, I would say big banks, and their puppets like the U.S. government are the real pirates.

  33. Woohoo by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info. Where can I download a plane ticket to Switzerland?

  34. EXCELLENT! by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Glad someone thinks that the Net is not just a "Free" (as in paid for by users) carrier for profit-making entities that do NOT pay the costs of maintaining and expanding the distribution network.
    If there is any reason for a net, it is the open distribution of material governments and corporate slime would rather you not have unless THEY decide you should.

  35. I am on holiday in Switzerland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I do not see any piracy here... actually I can't imagine someone here needing piracy: I'm earning a decent gage in Scandinavia and I learned that the maid in my hotel here in Switzerland earns 50% more and pays only about 20% of what i pay in tax...
    Why should anyone in Switzerland by a pirate ?

  36. Re:Makes me wish I spoke Swedish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweden ain't what it used to be, either. And that article's from 7 years ago. It's gotten worse now.

  37. The biggest joke about it by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is probably that the whole copyright shit is based on the Berne Convention.

    Take a guess where Berne is. Hint: It's in the link.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your status has been elevated to Bullseye!

    A much smaller, harder-to-hit target?

  39. So the reverse of the list is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the exact opposite of the US watch list is "this country allows a lot of personal liberties on the internet". And "This country is bad for "American Big Content"(tm). And "The Disney States of America have a watchlist of countries which allow too many personal liberties on the internet". Pick any of those.

  40. USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your own act togther and protect other countries assetts and IP in YOUR OWN country before making demands.

  41. Switzerland and maritime contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A piracy haven, in a country that doesn't touch the sea at all? That's rich :)

    1. Re:Switzerland and maritime contact by ffkom · · Score: 1
  42. Ways to Go, Switzerland! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a U.S.-naturalized Swiss, I feel very proud of this accomplishment by my native country.

    Well done!!!

    Now I hope the Swiss government will not cave in to whatever B.S. the U.S. comes up with and tell them to go f**k themselves.

  43. Re:Or, you know, privacy that really means somethi by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

    I remember this. They were pushing it in the late 90's for all the elementary school kids. This was happening here in WV, the state that only has one lab for fingerprint processing, doesn't have one for DNA, and has something along the lines of 10 to 20 year backlog at that one lab. The only time fingerprints are even collected is in the case of murder coupled with the victim being very rich.