Slashdot Mirror


Guy Who Didn't Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn't Invent Email (techdirt.com)

Mike Masnick, reporting for TechDirt: Oh boy. Remember Shiva Ayyadurai? The guy who has gone to great lengths to claim that he "invented email," when the reality is that he appears to have (likely independently) written an early implementation of email long after others had actually "invented email." In the past we've called out examples where gullible press have fallen for his easily debunked claims, but he keeps popping back up. The mainstream press repeated his bogus claims about inventing email after he married a TV star. And, most recently, he decided to scream at the press for memorializing Ray Tomlinson -- someone who actually did have a hand in creating email -- upon his death. [...] We, of course, have not been alone in debunking his claims. Back in 2012, a few weeks after we first debunked them, Gawker's Sam Biddle did a long and thorough takedown of Ayyadurai's claims. Apparently that story really angers Ayyadurai, and I'm guessing that seeing Hulk Hogan win his crazy lawsuit against Gawker helped Ayyadurai to decide to sue Gawker as well.

91 comments

  1. Just wanted to point out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that I'll sue anyone who prints that I didn't date Jennifer Anniston.

    1. Re:Just wanted to point out... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      that I'll sue anyone who prints that I didn't date Jennifer Anniston.

      You didn't date Jennifer Anniston! :)

    2. Re:Just wanted to point out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But, how do you know that Vince Vaughn doesn't post as AC on Slashdot?

    3. Re:Just wanted to point out... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      that I'll sue anyone who prints that I didn't date Jennifer Anniston.

      That's nothing....I'll sue anyone who claims they're not suing me.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Just wanted to point out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Vince Vaughn can probably spell Jennifer Aniston correctly

    5. Re:Just wanted to point out... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      But maybe the poster really did date a woman named Jennifer Anniston (with two n's) who is constantly annoyed by people asking if she starred in Friends.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:Just wanted to point out... by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      You may have dated Jennifer Anniston, but you didn't date Jennifer Aniston.

    7. Re:Just wanted to point out... by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward didn't date Jennifer Anniston.

    8. Re:Just wanted to point out... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Just waiting for Al Gore to be called as an expert witness

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    9. Re:Just wanted to point out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you sue anyone for pointing out a typo? It's written Aniston, not Anniston :P.
      Ok, I will show myself out.

    10. Re:Just wanted to point out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, you've beaten me to it.

    11. Re: Just wanted to point out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who would your brother sue?

  2. He's already punished himself by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Funny

    The celebrity wife in question is Fran Drescher.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:He's already punished himself by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Just like Gilbert Gottfried, that isn't her real voice.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:He's already punished himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, crap. You mean, she can sound even *more* annoying?!

    3. Re:He's already punished himself by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      Again a bogus summary? They say something about a "TV star".

      Fuck, editors, can't you get anything right?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:He's already punished himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess JDate over 50 wasn't working out so she had to settle for a bit less. I'd have to say for the both of them: I pity each of them for having to wake up next to the other every morning. I don't know who has it worse...

    5. Re:He's already punished himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen Spinal Tap? The girl was gorgeous! The Nanny was fucking hot!

    6. Re:He's already punished himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that Spinal Tap was released over 30 years ago, right?

    7. Re: He's already punished himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shiva Ayyadurai states on his own website that he and Fran Drescher are not married.

      "He also enjoys traveling with actress Fran Drescher with whom he held a spiritual ceremony on September 7, 2014 to celebrate their growing friendship."

      http://vashiva.com/about-va-shiva-ayyadurai/

  3. Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wait, why was Hulk's lawsuit crazy?

    1. Re:Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One side claimed they'd publish a sex tape of a child. That's pretty damn crazy.

    2. Re:Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to be clear, that side was Gawker.

      They asked how young some celebrity would have to be before they would refrain from publishing a sex tape of them.

      I forget what the numer was, but it was like 4 or 6. Something in the disgustingly creepy range.

    3. Re:Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creepy is the guy counting down the number of days until some 15 year old starlet is legal.

      This is just disgusting.

  4. What's wrong with the legal system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the legal system permit this nonsense to continue? And I don't mean this as a rhetorical question. I really want to know why baseless lawsuits drag on, and on, and on. (Another example is the SCO lawsuit.)

    Why doesn't the judge refuse to hear the case?

    1. Re:What's wrong with the legal system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is SCO, and what lawsuit are you talking about?

    2. Re:What's wrong with the legal system? by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Because the length of rope is insufficient for a good hanging.

  5. Conflicted by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the one hand, this lawsuit is, well, bonkers. On the other, he's suing Gawker so.... go crazy email not inventing guy?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:Conflicted by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I know the feel. Really, I think we've all been damaged by Gawker and have a valid claim. Someone should class action them into oblivion. For once I don't care that a lawyer is taking all the money while "risking" only a bit of his free time and I get maybe a $5 check. Just shut them down.

    2. Re:Conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the case of a crazy man raving that the sky is blue. I read the article and it's full of typical Gawker bullshit, stuff like unattributed claims that unnamed colleagues consider him a charlatan, but it does also cite the RFCs that describe email and predate Ayyadurai's EMAIL program by years. In this particular instance, they are correct.

    3. Re:Conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a wasted effort, since Gawker's probably mortally wounded already. He should sue Buzzfeed instead. He might even come up with a better reason.

      CAPTCHA: offing. Yes, that's what I had in mind.

    4. Re: Conflicted by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I saw Gawker quoted in the fricking Economist this week. It might be too late, but they still need to be reduced to a smoking hole in the ground.

  6. Has anyone seen his website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://vashiva.com/

    Dear jesus. Additionally, his wife has a book called "Cancer Schmancer".

    1. Re:Has anyone seen his website? by Copid · · Score: 1

      They're both total cranks. Shiva is very active in all sorts of bizarre stuff. He has a computer simulation that shows that GMO soy contains excess amounts of formaldehyde that he refuses to test against actual samples of GMO soy (something about it being undetectable and requiring a totally new kind of science to analyze).

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  7. Newsflash by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Guy who can't do jack shit tries to stay in the limelight by insane claims and publicity stunts.

    Wait, is that one of the Kadashians?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drumpf

    2. Re:Newsflash by Nothing2Chere · · Score: 1

      You would have been closer if you had mentioned Kanye.

    3. Re:Newsflash by sh00z · · Score: 1

      I didn't check the gossip sites this morning. As of yesterday, he still *was* one of the Kardashians.

  8. Life is short by zuki · · Score: 2

    Let's not spend any of those precious seconds ticking away talking about this... it's a collective waste of our time.

    Do NOT feed the troll, remember?

    1. Re:Life is short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. So I shall commence the piss-ripping shall I?

      His mother is so fat a distributed communication protocol was born spontaneously.

    2. Re:Life is short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not spend any of those precious seconds ticking away talking about this... it's a collective waste of our time.

      You must be new here.

  9. Jesus Fucking Christ by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Jesus Christ, this fucking asshole again? His claims were utterly decimated before, and now he wants to try to make the claim again.

    For the fucking record, you pathetic worthless fraud, if there was any single inventor of modern email, then it was Roy Tomlinson.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by geek · · Score: 5, Funny

      His claims were utterly decimated before, .

      They were reduced by 1/10th?

    2. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 0

      His claims were utterly decimated before, .

      They were reduced by 1/10th?

      Congratulations! You know an older (mostly obsolete) definition of a word. Too bad it's usage in the English language has changed. Similar to how the word "gay" used to simply mean happy and had no bearing on someone's sexual orientation.

    3. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, the older definition sucked. "Oh man that test totally decimated me, I made a 90/100!"

      Yeah, I'm sure it was a huge deal for the 1/10th of the people the romans killed.

    4. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who used it when the Master told the Toclafane to decimate the population. So they duly killed 1/10 of humanity. That episode got plaudits for correct usage of English. That illiterate dolts assume it means "destroy nearly all" it is immaterial, unless you also consider "irregardless" to be a valid word.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    5. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Ladies and gentleman... the etymological fallacy.

      Or, as I like to call it, cocaine for pedants.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by serbanp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ahem, the Romans were killing their own; it was punishment for a legion's failure in battle - akin to the modern "the beatings will continue until morale improves"...

    7. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well since that wasn't it's definition, no it didn't. If that test decimated you 1 of every 10 people who failed the test would have been put to death, and you would have been one of the selected ones.

    8. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who used it when the Master told the Toclafane to decimate the population.

      The fact that you cite a Doctor Who episode makes for a really convincing argument. That's simply not what it means to most people these days. A few years ago I read that US English was closer to proper English than what is spoken in the UK these days. I'm not sure if I believe it, but I know I've had a little trouble with the slang when I've been there on more than one occasion.

      I do chuckle anytime I hear the term "irregardless" used. According to Wikipedia, it was first used in print in 1795. I've read other places that it was used frequently on comedy radio programs in the 1930's. But at what point does a word become acceptable? When the majority of the population uses and understands it? Or when some English professor says it OK?

      How do you use the term "awful"? It used to be an adjective to describe something to be in awe of. Now the accepted meaning is the opposite.

      How do you use the term "Myriad"? When someone refers to a myriad of stars, do they mean exactly 10,000? If you use it as meaning any number other than 10,000, then that's technically incorrect.

      This is an internet forum, not a grade/high/university school writing class. A lot of people seem to forget that here.

    9. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a general punishment that the Romans might visit on a population or on their own legionaires.

    10. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by tinoesroho · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obliterated. Jeez. Obliterated, dismantled, buy never decimated.

    11. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English does indeed change over time, but the word 'decimated' has not drifted in the slightest, and probably never will given the relative stability of the decimal system. Using the wrong definition is simple ignorance.

    12. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago I read that US English was closer to proper English than what is spoken in the UK these days.

      Well that settles it!

      You arseclown.

    13. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      But it has, insomuch as dictionary definitions do not restrict the word in the way you do. From Webster's:

      Full Definition of decimate
      decimateddecimating
      transitive verb
      1
      : to select by lot and kill every tenth man of
      2
      : to exact a tax of 10 percent from
      3
      a : to reduce drastically especially in number
      b : to cause great destruction or harm to
      decimation play \de-s-m-shn\ noun

      Oxford even has a blog on it: http://blog.oxforddictionaries...

      Or, to put it very simply, you're just plain wrong.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And even if it was, "decimated" doesn't strictly mean 1/10th.

      http://blog.oxforddictionaries...

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, like these illiterate idiots that have no idea that December is actually the tenth month of the year....

    16. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by mrbester · · Score: 0

      So a line from a British show written by a Briton and starring Britons for a British audience isn't a good example of correct English? Stop inflicting your shitty offshoot separatist colonial dialect on me saying that I, as a native, am wrong about what is correct in *my* language. Oh, and learn to fucking spell as well.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    17. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to take a comment like yours seriously when you can't get its/it's right.

    18. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Given that the "shitty offshoot separatist colonial dialect" is closer to what the English USED to sound like than today's "English" accent, it's YOU who should be apologizing for screwing up the English language.

      http://the-toast.net/2014/03/1...

    19. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      So a line from a British show written by a Briton and starring Britons for a British audience isn't a good example of correct English?

      No it's not. How about "timey wimey"? That was also used in the show you mentioned. While it was certainly very funny, it doesn't lend much credence to Doctor Who being a paragon of the correct use of English.

      Stop inflicting your shitty offshoot separatist colonial dialect on me saying that I, as a native, am wrong about what is correct in *my* language.

      If you really want to go down that road, fine. I'll be happy to stop. Just as soon as you pay back this "shitty offshoot separatist colony" for bailing you out of two world wars. Oh, and for all of the shit in the middle east for the last 100 years, since your stupid-ass ancestors decided to carve it up the way you did after the fall of the Ottoman empire.

      Oh, and learn to fucking spell as well.

      Sod off, you stupid git.

    20. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by WallyL · · Score: 1

      Yes, for those who were in the 1/10th of the people killed, it was in fact a huge deal!

    21. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by mrbester · · Score: 1

      We did pay you back. It took us until 1999 so I'll add usurious to the list.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    22. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      And what is the definition of "it's" if I might ask?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  10. h1b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another h1b gen-2 idiot.

  11. Two words by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2

    Tort Reform. Why is it that none of the presidential candidates are talking about this and neither is the media?

    1. Re: Two words by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's possible tort reform could become an agenda item on a Trump platform. He's not a fucking lawyer like most politicians.

    2. Re:Two words by acoustix · · Score: 1

      It would need to be done at multiple levels. Reform at the federal level is fine, but each of the states has their own laws as well. At least that is my understanding.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    3. Re: Two words by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering the number of frivolous lawsuits Trump has initiated, I'm thinking tort reform won't be at the top of his list either.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Two words by pwileyii · · Score: 1

      Just because someone announces they are going to sue, doesn't mean it is going to go somewhere. Civil lawsuits are pretty much the only way for private citizens to go against large companies and have a remote chance of hurting the company. "Tort reform is the large companies trying to making fighting them impossible or not worth the effort. Meditation in the terms and condition of every product and service imaginable along with using lobbyists and P.R. to get news like this in the press in order to make "tort reform" an issue the private citizens can get behind when in reality tort reform is designed with the SOLE PURPOSE of hurting individuals and helping large companies.

    5. Re:Two words by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Because "tort reform" is the smokescreen corporations put on their efforts to limit their class-action liability via legislation and incomplete stories of outrageous sums awarded to an old lady for spilling coffee on her lap, or a burglar for falling through the skylight of the home he was breaking into, or an attempted suicide failing to be killed by a train he intentionally jumped in front of. Almost every time you read one of those stories, there's salient information not being included.

    6. Re:Two words by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

      Totally missing the big picture. The mere threat of a lawsuit requires that you have rather expensive liability insurance and a legal team on retainer. Big bucks. In addition, the standard practice is to settle out of court without any proof of guilt to make it go away because of the specter of bad publicity. All of that costs a lot of money and has to be built into the cost of doing business.

    7. Re:Two words by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, just about anyone can file papers. You're right that to have a hope of hell of winning, you generally need a pretty good lawyer, but there's no particular expertise required to filing the paperwork.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  12. What's with the other claims? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    He holds four degrees from MIT (where he lectures), numerous patents, honors, and awards. He also says he invented email, and there's a global conspiracy against him. Guess which one of these statements is true.

    Uh... okay. So it's the last one, I guess. But what are these other claims about? Has he claimed those to be true as well? Or only the last one?

    Or was the writer just trying to jazz up his piece?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:What's with the other claims? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It's not as if very intelligent people can't also be paranoid, delusional, or insane.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:What's with the other claims? by krkhan · · Score: 2

      After the controversy unfolded, MIT disassociated itself from Ayyadurai's EMAIL Lab and funding was dropped. MIT also revoked Ayyadurai's contract to lecture at the bioengineering department. [1]

      [1] http://www.bostonmagazine.com/...

    3. Re:What's with the other claims? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      His whole argument seems to come down to the fact that he invented an email system with the name "email" as opposed to "electronic mail" or "e-mail". He believes his copyrighting of the term "Email" gives his claims some sort of increased merit. There's something of the etymological fallacy to this, since the difference between "e-mail" and "email" is pretty small. I'm not even sure the copyright it even defensible, but that's a side issue.

      I have two theories about this guy. One is that he's just a fraud, and the other that he's mentally ill and suffering some sort of fixation. He has literally allowed this whole fracas to severely damage his career; MIT basically canned him over this.

      I think the guy is an extraordinarily egotistical asshole, but I'm also beginning to think he's probably nuts. Why would anyone pursue a matter to the extent, and accruing the kind of personal damage he has, simply so people won't mention RFCs or Tomlinson? It's fucking crazy. And considering the number of places his claims were exposed as hyperbole and in some ways outright lies, is he going to sue everyone who demonstrated the inherent flaws and inaccuracies in his claim? I get that he had made some sort of business out of his BS claim, but it's dead now. No court is going to award jack shit, not in the US anyways.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:What's with the other claims? by fsagx · · Score: 1

      He's also made other outrageous claims, like he invented the question mark.

    5. Re:What's with the other claims? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's trying to garner enough interest in himself that the "threats" from previous employers in India won't be carried out. If the media pays enough attention to him, those wily assassins won't be able to get near.

      Maybe he's just delusional.

      I wrote a program to monitor and stop analysts and other programmers from compiling their code at inappropriate run-time priorities - that doesn't mean I get credit as the inventor of process queueing and scheduling.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  13. Everyone knows who invented e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It was Al Gore, and Manbearpig stole the server and ran off innawoods.

  14. I'm a prodigy, you hear!? by suupaabaka · · Score: 1

    He was 14 when he "invented email".

    Let's just ignore ARPANET, which had been floating about for a while.

    1. Re:I'm a prodigy, you hear!? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Ayyadurai's whole claim really rests on the fact that he copyrighted the term "Email". Therefore, in the twisted logic of he and his supporters (who very likely are all just sockpuppets of Ayyadurai), that means he "invented" "Email". It's really just equivocation, and probably a bit of an etymological fallacy.

      But his attacks on Tomlinson, who in fact, never even claimed to invent electronic mail, but rather came up with the "@" symbol as a means of routing mail between ARPANET servers, demonstrates that even in his own mind he confuses what he supposedly invented. In the end, he invented some email system that was briefly used, died like so much software, inspired no descendants, and had nothing at all to do with the descendants of the Arpanet email systems still in use today. It was an unknown dead end whose only legacy is some guy with a potentially worthless copyright and a serious psychological disturbance.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:I'm a prodigy, you hear!? by hattig · · Score: 1

      He wrote a program called EMAIL, starting in 1979. It didn't do the key essential parts of what we consider email.

      Sadly, the key email RFCs came out in 1972 and 1977, and the concept was in progress in 1965. The ones crediting Tomlinson, etc.

      If this gets to court (unlikely), then he will get destroyed (and not before time, it appears). Even the race card he plays is a total lie, as the RFCs include an Indian co-author.

      Diddums.

    3. Re:I'm a prodigy, you hear!? by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I'm gonna kick myself for admitting this but I think I know him and I'm 99.9% sure that's what we used (I'm MIT Alumni) for inter-departmental communiques. (Yes, verbiage intentional.)

      Now, this was a lot of years ago and my head's a bit fuzzy from years of varied substance abuses but man, if he's who I think he is, he's supposedly an idiot and an arrogant twat. (Not firsthand knowledge - repeated after some lectures others went to.) I won't swear that it's him but if you really want I can try to contact some old friends and see if they remember.

      If it is him, and if my friends are to be believed - it was quite mentionable as he had a fit in a lecture hall, then I am not even remotely surprised. (79 - 83 and 87 - 91. Applied Mathematics, if you're curious.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  15. I didn't invent email either. how much can I get? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and who do I sue, The Connected Internet?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  16. Tomlinson invented using @ in addresses by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Which was a great improvement over the old bang paths; at least you could be reasonably assured your message would reach the intended recipient. It also established a uniform way to address someone without having to decipher a path to the recipient.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Tomlinson invented using @ in addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just had to remind us of bang paths...

  17. Bio of Shiva Ayyadurai by ooloorie · · Score: 2

    Here is a brief bio of the Shiva Ayyadurai, if you are not familiar with him. His sons, of course, are much more famous.

    Ayyadurai started his career as a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low-grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. In 1978, he married a fifteen-year-old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. Ayyadurai enjoys womanizing and drinking. In addition to email, he also invented the question mark. Ayyadurai has two sons, Austin and Douglas.

  18. Hogan deserved the win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hulk Hogan completely deserved to win his case though so there really is no comparison. This guy is making baseless accusations about E-Mail but regardless of what you think about the Hulk Gawker clearly broke the law in the Hulks case.

  19. That's Nothing by eumoria · · Score: 1

    I didn't invent written correspondence where's my article. I'll deny it all day.