Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Was The Greatest Era Of Innovation? (nytimes.com)

speedplane writes: The New York Times is running a story on innovation over the past 150 years. [The story starts at the end of the American Civil War with the newly completed transcontinental railway in the 1870s. Then it highlights the profoundly different lifestyle of the 1920s, the end of 'The Great War' and the beginning of the Great Depression. By the 1970s, many of the transportation and communication changes from the 20s became fundamental parts of daily life. The story ends in 2016, an era in which human life has changed the most in the last 46 years.]

We're in the golden age of innovation, an era in which digital technology is transforming the underpinnings of human existence. Or so a techno-optimist might argue. We're in a depressing era in which innovation has slowed and living standards are barely rising. That's what some skeptical economists believe. The truth is, this isn't a debate that can be settled objectively.

What do slashdotters think is the greatest era of innovation?


177 comments

  1. Paleolithic era by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stone knives and bear skins.

    1. Re: Paleolithic era by rfengr · · Score: 1

      Only if using them for neumonic memory circuits.

    2. Re:Paleolithic era by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      Bang!

      13.7 billion years ago.

    3. Re:Paleolithic era by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I watched that last night. Not sure the kids got it though. I wouldn't have thought time travel paradoxes would be too difficult for a 7 year old, but he probably takes after his mother.

      That aside, couldn't Kirk have proved somehow that he's from the future and convinced her to *not* head up the anti-war movement?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Paleolithic era by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      How about when the beginnings of keeping a pack of dogs close to the tribe, successfully. And using those dogs as a form of night watch for predators?

    5. Re: Paleolithic era by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had neumes in the Paleolithic?

  2. Era Of The Tower Of Babel by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Humanity had reached a point of superior self satisfaction that God destroyed their civilization to dust. I would dare say there have been many 'era's of great innovation but keeping in the modern times I would say from 1850-1950.

    1. Re:Era Of The Tower Of Babel by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      PS. Screw the ny times. Walled garden POS. I democratically reject your republic.

    2. Re:Era Of The Tower Of Babel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mistake in the whole question is in assuming that time is linear. What happens when someone "innovates" time travel? How do you start counting, then?

    3. Re:Era Of The Tower Of Babel by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      The truly greatest era of innovation was when a human picked up something and defended itself from a predator, successfully; then thought, "I will try this again."

    4. Re:Era Of The Tower Of Babel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clear your browser's cookies, NYT articles will come up. After viewing your 5th article, clear cookies again.

  3. Industrial revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Easy. Industrial revolution. Our quality of life is still improving because of that period of innovation.

    1. Re:Industrial revolution by ganv · · Score: 2

      Yes, but that is maybe a bit too easy. The scientific thinking and economic arrangements that allowed the industrial revolution are continuing to spread around the world and to transform our lives. The commonly labelled 'industrial revolution' of 1760-1830 produced machine made cloth, readily available power from water and steam, and the beginnings of railroads, but it is prominent for the derivative of the economic growth rate and not the maximum value. Without question, growth measured by economic measures has never been higher than in China from 1980 to 2010. But innovation? That is somewhat nebulous. Does innovative painting count? Maybe I come back to agree with you though. Almost nothing has been as revolutionary or innovative as the transformation in how we conceive of the workings of the universe between 1687 and 1960. Arguably the most rapid period of scientific innovation was between 1800 and 1900 when most of our understanding of thermodynamics, basic chemistry, fluid dynamics, geology, evolution, electricity, magnetism, and optics were placed on solid phenomenological and empirical foundations. Cool stuff happened in the 20th century, but relativity, quantum mechanics, and detailed computational chemistry have been much less transformational than electromagnetism, basic chemistry, and evolution have been.

    2. Re: Industrial revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technological growth is exponential, so the first derivative is greater today than in the past. And to suggest quantum mechanics aren't as important suggests that semiconductor devices aren't that important - when I would argue they're one of the most Important developments of the past century. And we wouldn't be putting useful things in space if it weren't for relativity. GPS depends heavily on time dilation as predicted by Einstein and I would say it is also one of the most important advancement of our time. But as far as the most important thing for our standard of living today is easily agricultural advancements, most notably being genetic engineering - most people don't realize serious starvation was a real thing not that long ago for a lot of people, a problem that has been completely eliminated in the western world. (and by starvation I mean malnutrition being a regular cause of death)

    3. Re: Industrial revolution by ganv · · Score: 1

      OK, it is standard to argue on slashdot, but it is more interesting to learn and build better ideas. You have interesting points, but are missing the big picture. If you want to be technical I did say 'economic growth rate' which is the exponential rate constant, so steady exponential growth would have zero first derivative of the economic growth rate.

      Modern electronics is dominated by classical E&M. Quantum mechanics is important. But the idea of electronic computers was clear and they were being used well before anyone used quantum mechanics to build solid state transistors to make them much more efficient and powerful. On the other hand, in 1800, no one knew what electricity was and no one had any idea that electric currents could emit radio waves to communicate around the planet. By 1900 the electron had been discovered, Niagara falls power plant was powering electric lights in a city and radio communication had begun. The scientific innovations of the 19th century were profoundly transformational. The 20th century added some important pieces...and you are right that biology is where the 20th century really holds its own. But even the green revolution has its roots well into the 19th century. Most of the technology for the green revolution dates back to the 1800s. It was the social embrace of better seed varieties, fertilizer, irrigation, machinery and scientific management much more than genetic engineering that transformed our food supply. Of course the original post has the provocative title 'Greatest era of innovation' and that is subjective. But I think you haven't put a dent in my argument that the 19th century has a pretty strong case for it.

  4. that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, oh, I know this one!

    3500 BC was the greatest era of invention.

    Why 3500 BC, you ask?

    The (approximate, of course) invention of beer.

    Go ahead, tell me of a greater one. Can't, can ya?

    1. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, oh, I know this one!

      3500 BC was the greatest era of invention.

      Why 3500 BC, you ask?

      The (approximate, of course) invention of beer.

      Go ahead, tell me of a greater one. Can't, can ya?

      It's true, I can't. But the eras in which toilets and refrigerators were invented were certainly complementary.

    2. Re:that's an easy one! by jc42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      3500 BC was the greatest era of invention. Why 3500 BC, you ask? The (approximate, of course) invention of beer. Go ahead, tell me of a greater one. Can't, can ya?

      People will no doubt laugh at this, but it's actually a good observation (though we should include wine in the list). The reason is simple: We humans need to ingest a fair amount of water each day to stay healthy. But historically, water itself has been rather dangerous stuff. Consider all the other people and animals upstream who have been using it for both bathing and disposing of waste of various sorts. Do you want to drink that water? Not if you want a long, healthy life.

      Part of the year, our ancestors could get some of the needed water by consuming fruits, which are high in water. But they mostly don't keep very well, and they spoil. Fermented juices have their sugars partly converted to ethanol, which is toxic to most of the spoilage micro-organisms, so the resulting wine or beer is much less likely to spoil. (If it does, the result is often vinegar, which is another way of preserving the juice in a way that's safe for humans to consume).

      It's pretty well understood among historians, anthropologists, etc., that fermentation processes were a significant part of our ancestors' development into a long-lived species that eventually dominated much of the planet. Yes, it's fun to get drunk, and to joke about getting drunk. And some other animals can get drunk, since ripe fruits often contain around 1% ethanol. (I've read some funny stories about groups of elephants getting a bit tipsy from the consumption of ripe fruit. Imagine a crowd of drunk elephants partying in your neighborhood. ;-) But the fact is that ethanol-laced liquids are historically an important part of our history, because ethanol provided a way to make those liquids safe to drink.

      There was a fun study some time back, in which some researchers traveled around the world, stopping in various eateries, ordering food, and taking it back to their hotel room to feed to the lab equipment they'd brought along. They were testing it for safety (and ate the food that passed their tests ;-). Their main summary of their results was that, if you want a simple rule for ordering something safe to drink, no matter where you are, order beer. They didn't always like the beer everywhere, but their tests never found beer that was unsafe for human consumption. Wine was in second place, but they did find contaminated wine in a few places.

      The explanation seems to be that, as anyone who has tried brewing beer knows, you have to be really careful about cleanliness during the brewing, or you get an awful-smelling glop that nobody will drink. With wine, the process seems easy, and you can get good-smelling wine by just letting the fruit juice (with perhaps added yeast) ferment, but sometimes the result has contaminants that aren't obvious. But with beer, this doesn't work; you have to boil it all to sterilize it, add a yeast culture, make sure that stuff floating in the air can't get into the containers, or everyone will know that you've failed the instant they sniff it. So beer probably is the most significant brewing achievement in human history.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:that's an easy one! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      But historically, water itself has been rather dangerous stuff. Consider all the other people and animals upstream who have been using it for both bathing and disposing of waste of various sorts. Do you want to drink that water? Not if you want a long, healthy life.

      Plus, fish fuck in that water. That's why I stick to beer and brown liquor for my hydration needs.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:that's an easy one! by Wovel · · Score: 2

      Everything since beer is just an incremental improvement.

    5. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dog eats its own poop. Half the world doesn't have clean water and exists, maybe not well by modern western standards, but not going extinct.

    6. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot have a Scotland without Whisky, can you

    7. Re:that's an easy one! by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Just one comment/correction, for the most part people did not drink beer/wine as a substitute for water, they drank a heavily watered down version with the alcohol working as a disinfectant. I don't think even the small elite that could afford it drank the "real deal" all the time, because of the intoxicating and dehydrating effects. That would typically be for celebrations and ceremonies and other festive events. So having decent water to begin with was very important, whether it came from wells, rainwater, streams or lakes. The Greeks and Romans did some various forms of mechanical and chemical treatment in the big cities, but in practice filtered drinking water didn't become common until the 17-18th century. For the most part you took untreated water, mixed it out with a tiny bit of beer/wine and you drank it.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:that's an easy one! by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Pizza....

      Personally, my vote is for the Internet age. Love it or hate it, it provides a bridge for interaction with far-off loved ones, different cultures, and has huge implications for education. Yes, there are negatives, much like there are negatives to beer (specifically consuming too much).

      Plus, it was built largely on Beer and Pizza, so you know that it HAS to be important... (grin)

    9. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bottled water has been recalled multiple times for E. Coli, Listeria, Salmonella and Cryptosporidium. But there is not a single publicized case of these contaminations in whiskey.

    10. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a myth, at least historically. You may well be better off ordering a bottle (beer/coke) in somewhere like East Asia provided you don't have any ice, but fresh water was often available to humans. There is also evidence that people believed boiling water was better, even if they weren't sure why. Think about it - people aren't stupid, if everyone gets sick from the same water source, you stop drinking from that source and you make up some argument about how it's infected with bad spirits. Water collected from rain and melted snow, prior to the industrial era with the risk of acid rain, was perfectly safe to drink.

      http://knowledgenuts.com/2014/03/03/bad-water-never-made-people-drink-beer-instead/

      http://leslefts.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/the-great-medieval-water-myth.html

    11. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In Asia, pottery vessels containing chemical signatures of a mixture of honey, rice and other fruits along with organic compounds of fermentation dating from 6500-7000 BC were found in Northern China."

      Take your newfangled beer and pour it in a ditch!

    12. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese have been drinking boiled water only since ancient times. This is a more hygienic, cost-effective and civilised way to prevent water poisoning.

    13. Re:that's an easy one! by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      because ethanol provided a way to make those liquids safe to drink

      Same for tea, being made with boiling water.

    14. Re:that's an easy one! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yup, and I've used the same explanation for why I'd prefer coffee to plain water. Water is just boring; adding a bit of flavor (with or without the mild stimulation of the caffeine) makes it more palatable. Any tasty plant material will work. I've also run across the same explanation for why soups of various kinds are so common in most of the world. They have fewer nutrients than their ingredient, so why not just heat up and eat the meats and veggies? Well, you need a good amount of water in your diet, and you want it boiled to make it safe to drink, so why not take some of the tougher cuts of meat , mix in assorted other tough and/or tasty ingredients, simmer them for a while, and consume the result? It adds variety to your diet, and is a good way to use up the odds and ends from other meals in a way that's a lot more palatable than just drinking water.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    15. Re:that's an easy one! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except it doesn't protect against chemical contaminants like lead or arsenic, but keep up the boiling!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    16. Re:that's an easy one! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      But beer tastes better than Mead, Sake, and Wine mixed together.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:that's an easy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a very plausible historical theory that beer itself caused civilization.

      Nils K. Hammer

  5. The sliced bread machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing is better than sliced bread.

    1. Re: The sliced bread machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We here in civilisation call it a Bread Slicer.

    2. Re: The sliced bread machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless its sliced too thick, theres a coffe shop that, "makes their own bread" but must have two chefs...its either an inch+ think or a more palatable 5/8...a world oc difference for bacon, evg, cheese sammy.

    3. Re:The sliced bread machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sliced bread, over the internet, that is.

  6. This is the peak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the peak of human civilization. Innovation will not slow down - on the contrary, it will continue to accelerate. But as that happens, the things that govern our identity - our human frailties - will cease to be relevant. Ironically, just as medical science learns how to cure every conceivable disease, our very bodies will become completely replaceable, and thus irrelevant. Human identity will cease to exist.

    1. Re: This is the peak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Inflatable leading edge kites the last 20 years. Best thing I've found so far.

  7. 1870s to 1970s by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My grandmother lived in a time where she saw the invention of the Horseless carriage to man landing on the moon. Thing I have seen man land on the moon, but what have we done since then? That would top that?

    1. Re:1870s to 1970s by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

      It's not fair to compare a 100 year period to a 46 year period. (the time "since then") I strongly suspect the period from 1970 to 2070 will see changes your grandmother wouldn't dream possible even after seeing all that. Driverless cars, brain integrated internet access, thought controlled devices, strong AI, a global end to poverty-related suffering and an active, healthy Mars colony aren't any real stretch of imagination for the next 50 years.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:1870s to 1970s by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      what have we done since then?

      Eradicated smallpox. Not as sexy as landing on the moon but certainly as difficult, more practical, and probably more dangerous.

      Trivia: I will never forget the moon landing, mum let me have the day off school to watch it at home, I was so enthralled by the broadcast that I accidently sat on a plate of spaghetti.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re: 1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than driverless cars I sincerely doubt you'll see many of the things on your list.

    4. Re:1870s to 1970s by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Funny

      Trivia: I will never forget the moon landing, mum let me have the day off school to watch it at home, I was so enthralled by the broadcast that I accidently sat on a plate of spaghetti.

      One small sitting for the boy, one giant mess for the mom.

    5. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She saw the formation of the modern world (culture, philosophy, politics, technology). That is something that simply cannot be beaten for hundreds of years to come. The submission talked about innovations as opposed to inventions. Innovation is an invention that has been transformed into economic activity. All this skimming of the margins, hugely complicated insurance and investment schemes, high frequency trading and dot.com booms and startup culture are the sings of ever more laborious extraction of innovation from invention. It is as if the process of discovery and creation of innovations would approach the discovery of oil. Do we therefore approach "peak innovation" at this time?

    6. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cat videos on demand

    7. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      None of which would be possible without the invention of the washing machine (1908) and the refridgerator/freezer (invented multiple times until the modern self contained units of the 1930s).

      If you've ever had to hand wash, or live without refridgeration/freezing for a few weeks, you would have noticed how mind-bendingly central these two items are for maintaining a modern life.

    8. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have photos from PLUTO!! and extended pix from SATURN!! if that doesn't blow your mind you are dead.

    9. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandma walked to a one-room school as a first grader, passing fields being tilled by horse-drawn single-share plows. She died in 2005, having seen moon landings and plenty more on TV. That's quite a stretch. My kids are young enough to have never seen a record player, and the phones they use are smartphones. The "stretch" in innovation they've seen in their lives so far has been the ascendance of apps, smart TV, and, umm... hoverboards?

    10. Re:1870s to 1970s by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      We used a rocket crane to land a nuclear-powered robot the size of a Buick on the surface of Mars.

    11. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Thing I have seen man land on the moon, but what have we done since then? That would top that?

      There is one thing... Matt Damon landed on Mars! True Fact!

    12. Re:1870s to 1970s by Evtim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe not sexy but certainly recognized by the whole world. I just read the story of Edward Jenner [1749-1823] - the father of vaccination, in the excellent "Book of the dead" from the QI guys. When the world started using his approach and saw the results this humble, great human, who disliked the fame and never tried to capitalize on it, who kept on working quietly to the rest of his days was hailed, respected and adored perhaps more than any other human in history [apart from religious figures, I guess].

      British MP said that every foreigner - commoner, diplomat or dignitary he meets first asks him how is Jenner doing...Jefferson was ecstatic and highly complimentary...Jenner was presented to and awarded honors by the most powerful rulers in the world from US to Russia and more or less everyone else...even Napoleon released two captured Brits because Edward wrote him a letter [one of the captives was a relative of him]; Napoleon exclaimed "Ah, Jenner, I can refuse him nothing"

      The day that we should always remember is 14th May 1796 [hey, today is the 220 anniversary, that's great!!!] - on this day he took discharge from the hand of a milkmaid who had cowpox and used it to immunize 8 year old boy who acquired then complete immunity to smallpox. No-one knows what happened to the milkmaid [Sarah Nelmes] but the hide of her cow Blossom is still in St George hospital...

      Edward Jenner - what a man!

    13. Re:1870s to 1970s by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I was walking through a fleamarket with my son (he would have been 6) and there was a stand with vinyl records and various decks - old wind up jobs to 80's audiophile stuff.

      I asked him if he knew what they were. "Are they CDs?" was the reply.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:1870s to 1970s by ranton · · Score: 1

      None of which would be possible without the discovery of electricity and the invention of electricity generation and transmission. If you disregard any innovations built upon previous ones, then I guess 10000 BC wins by your criteria.

      If you've ever had to hand wash, or live without refrigeration/freezing for a few weeks, you would have noticed how mind-bendingly central these two items are for maintaining a modern life.

      These technologies primarily just enable two earner households, not maintaining modern life. Washing machines, refrigerators, microwaves, and vacuums have collectively made adequate housekeeping a part time job for the average household. They also enable parents to spend far more time parenting than a couple generations ago. Even working parents spend more time interacting with their kids today than stay at home parents did 50 years ago because of these technologies.

      If you replace washing machines and refrigerators with electricity and indoor plumbing then I would agree with you.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    15. Re:1870s to 1970s by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You're talking about technological greatness, in a discussion about Innovation. Yeah landing on a moon and getting a horseless cart is a great achievement, but in terms of innovation I don't think it comes close to the invention of electricity in the preceding generation, or the invention of the train.

    16. Re:1870s to 1970s by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Not to denigrate Jenner -- who deserves loads of credit. But innoculation with cowpox or a mild form of smallpox was commonly practiced in the American colonies in the 1770s. In point of fact after an early period where the practice of innoculation was forbidden by George Washington, recruits to the Continental army were deliberately infected with a mild strain of smallpox upon enlistment. http://www.mountvernon.org/dig...

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    17. Re:1870s to 1970s by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      "accidently sat on a plate of spaghetti"...BEHOLD, a truly religious experience. As Man walked on the Moon, you were touched by His Noodly Appendage.

    18. Re:1870s to 1970s by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      a global end to poverty-related suffering

      There's far too much profit in poverty for that to happen.

    19. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not picking on your kid here but isn't it funny how our culture celebrates ignorance. Kind of ironic taking the article in account.

    20. Re:1870s to 1970s by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Unless he grows up to be a hipster (in which case I'll disown him) he's pretty unlikely to ever hear a vinyl record, let alone own one.

      It's more about obsolescence than ignorance. Would you have recognised an Edison cylinder at that age?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    21. Re:1870s to 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now ask yourself why the pace of technical innovation has slowed down after 1970

    22. Re: 1870s to 1970s by suupaabaka · · Score: 1

      Other than driverless cars

      Go back a handful of years, and you wouldn't even write that.

    23. Re:1870s to 1970s by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Heck, that's nothing, he also landed on an ice planet in another galaxy!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    24. Re:1870s to 1970s by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Specifically, I would say that social innovation took the front seat at that point.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  8. Certainly not recent history by FordenFreeman · · Score: 0

    The sad truth is that most of the "innovations" or recent society are all that innovative and are far more iterative. Even the move to cell phones and smart phones was an iterative rehash of an old RISC platform. I would argue that our period of greatest innovation was from the mid 1860s through roughly the mid 1940s, roughly an 80 year span. Cronyism wasn't as strong it allowed people to experiment in the market with new ideas. The advent of the telegraph relay switch allowed mankind to start automating. The modern era was merely materials science catching up with logic and design that mankind already had in mind (see the Annoted Turing if you doubt this). Also, medical technologies have been largely stagnant since the 70s, and I would argue that that is due largely to big pharma lobbying congress and keeping the most revolutionary ideas out of mainstream use. At any rate, it feels as though innovation is lately in the software field where there is still some modicum of freedom, but that too is slowly being erased under the auspices of "safety".

    1. Re: Certainly not recent history by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      You can say building the railroads and everything else 100 years ago was just finding used for all the metal that people were mining and refining All innovation depends on prior inventions and breakthroughs

    2. Re: Certainly not recent history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Renaissance for going against conventional wisdom, and the era of quantum mechanics for going against Newtonian physics.

    3. Re:Certainly not recent history by ranton · · Score: 1

      On the contrary I would say the last 20 years has seen the most innovation of any other 20 year period, and the next 20 years will beat out the last 20. And this will continue probably forever, or until a global extinction event takes us out.

      New ideas may not be as transformative, although that is a product of technology solving all the low hanging fruit over the past 200 years. But new ideas are researched, sent to market, and iterated on at a faster rate today than any other time. The agricultural revolution is obviously the most transformative period of innovation, but it is a stretch to think fostering new ideas was more prevalent in 10,000 BC than it is today.

      By any objective metrics you could use to measure innovation, such as R&D spending as a proportion of GDP (both private and public), the rate of change of business processes, the percentage of population in STEM fields, etc, I doubt there is any period in history that contends with today. Maybe the 1960's comes close because of the cold war but I still doubt it matches the current decade.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  9. right NOW by tombak · · Score: 1

    Technology moves up in bursts and I believe right now we are going through one of these growth spurts mainly because of the new strides in the field of machine learning. Deep Learning algorithms are now opening some interesting venues that weren't there before. Soon commodity AI tools will be ubiquitous and you'll see a new era where we can incorporate Machine learning into many applications. Autonomous Navigation is one of the results of this machine learning revolution and soon we will see a lot more. H

    1. Re:right NOW by GoChickenFat · · Score: 1

      The innovations of today just feel like trinkets...my life has been changed very little in the last several decades by innovations that matter much. Turning everything into social media to peddle trinkets of life is not a great innovation.

    2. Re:right NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Deep Learning algorithms " If only this could be applied to humans we might have some innovation show up. We should probably put more effort into making smarter humans instead of smarter phones. And it's hard to define a particular era that saw a growth in innovation. Turning an idea or theory into reality can take a long time. The greatest motivation for Innovation and technical advances has always been war. Damn near every piece of high tech in use today was developed by the military. In the modern era this includes voice and data communication advancements, Internet, nuclear power, micro-chips, GPS, satellites, rockets, aerospace technologies, material science, component miniaturization, improved manipulation over the electromagnetic spectrum, and medical technology are just a few examples.

    3. Re:right NOW by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Baloney. There isn't any better Machine Learning than there was 30 years ago. Just better marketing by the venture capitalists.

    4. Re:right NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My GPS of 1994 did autonomous navigation. Cruise missiles had terrain following vision systems for at least 20 years.

    5. Re:right NOW by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "The innovations of today just feel like trinkets..."

      Yes and no. Cell phones and to some extent GPS really are changing the way people interact and live. But I agree that much modern "innovation" is pointless when it isn't actively annoying. And some of it seems to act as a stupidity amplifier -- something the world does not remotely need. But I expect when todays young adults look back at the world from the perspective of old age you will see transformative innovations. Just not necessarily the ones we might identify today.

      BTW, I'd say that the three biggest innovations during the nearly 80 years I've been around are medicines that actually work, crops that yield many more calories from each acre farmed, and an great dimunation in cultural isolation over vast swaths of the planet.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    6. Re:right NOW by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      80 years? Your UID says you must be less than 40 years old. Get off my lawn! ;)

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    7. Re:right NOW by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I guess you must be right as no technology stopped you making stuff up.

  10. Solving for X... by RyanFenton · · Score: 2

    Let's see...
    What is, THE FUTURE, Alex?

    I'm thinking innovation scales with population, available tools, recorded experience, and accessible resources - all of which are still increasing.

    In fact, almost every measurable aspect of human life is actually improving over time so far.

    Combine the increasing effects of the Flynn effect, drastically reduced violence over time, automation, increased health standards, and I can't see how the immediate future won't continue the increase in innovation over time.

    Not that this is news of course. It's so not news, that you barely even hear of it - and why it's actually so hard for many folks who don't pay attention to science and statistics to even believe. To most folks, the only science news they hear about the future is climate change and extiction rates - both of which are true, but are NOWHERE near a complete picture that science shows us. We've got a lot to fix, but compared to vast stretches of planetary history where single populations explode and take over the biological landscape, we're doing amazing.

    Which is also why the future of innovation is important.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Solving for X... by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      Personally I am afraid that once the rich get their solar charging flying death robots and wholly robotized economy theyre gonna off all the serfs who just became irredeemably worthless as anything but fertilizer due to human labour in general becoming obsolete.

      Why bother keeping sheep around if they can't grow wool anymore?

    2. Re:Solving for X... by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

      Personally I am afraid that once the rich get their solar charging flying death robots and wholly robotized economy theyre gonna off all the serfs who just became irredeemably worthless as anything but fertilizer due to human labour in general becoming obsolete.

      Why bother keeping sheep around if they can't grow wool anymore?

      Solar charged flying death robots are actually pretty easy to defeat with 99-to-1 odds in your favor. How? Throw crap at them. Or mud. And if there's one thing that us descendants of primates can do, it's hide in, and throw dirt. Yes, drones and the like are ideal for military scenarios with known targets, but they won't stop a mob under cover. Generate enough hobos, and not enough mansions and factories would survive functional to keep the oligarchy running. That and, you know, cheap printed guns and explosives.

      Short of hobo-status though, people are still going to gather resources and innovate even with idiotic leaders - tools are constantly made cheaper and more useful. Even the dark ages were chock full of inventions (not even counting torture devices), and we're far too accustomed to peace/resources to go anywhere near that horrible a state in the immediate future without a monumental catastrophe.

      Ryan Fenton

    3. Re:Solving for X... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is medication for that.

    4. Re:Solving for X... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Yes, but a constant stream of bad news is necessary to drive positive social change. Climate change is the #1 issue driving us towards a bright future of leftism and one world government. If everyone stopped reporting imminent doom, change couldn't occur. So it's necessary.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Solving for X... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much nonsense you must be a bot, and not a very good one at that

    6. Re:Solving for X... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I feel nothing but pity for the scared life you must lead, missing out on all the wonders of the universe as they pass you by because you, in your great wisdom and infallibility, assume they don't exist. You are constantly confusing your hubris with evidence, and look where it gets you - you think the pinnacle of your contribution to this thread is proudly proclaiming you either don't understand some very basic science, or that you feel adhering to some political identity is more important than actually learning.

      Either way you really need to work on yourself, lest you die cold and bitter.

  11. Start of WWI to end of WWII by tomhath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The world went from the horse and buggy age to the jet/atomic age in 30 years. Huge innovations in electronics, transportation, medicine, everything, in one generation.

    1. Re:Start of WWI to end of WWII by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Pah. Horseless schmoreseless. Compare that to the last 30.

      We've:
      Taken things that already exist and done them with a computer.
      Taken things that already exist and done them over the internet.
      Taken things that already exist and done them on a phone.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. Anthropocene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they conveniently didn't define "era," I'm going with ~10000 years ago to present.

  13. 1890 to 1914 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's when radio, turntables, automobiles, aircraft, and home refrigerators moved out of the labs with practical commercial products that caught the attention of the public.

    As an analogy, the seeds of the Internet began as early as 1960, but the public for the most part didn't know about it until Netscape Navigator hit the street in 1995.

    1. Re:1890 to 1914 by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      My grandfather, in the late 1960's, said to me "the changes we saw between 1896 and 1914 were amazing. We looked back at time before then and thing 'that was the last century'. When (if) you get to 2014, you will look back on 1996 and say ;that was the last millenium; the changes will appear 10 times bigger!".

      In 1896, transport was horse drawn. There were no cars or aeroplanes, no radio, and few people had even seen a phone.

      For those who can't remember, in 1996, few people had seen a computer (yes, I saw one in 1956, but I am talking about most people), no Internet (I had been using it since the 1980's, but few people knew about it), No mobile phones (I had one - it was the size of a car battery - cos it had one in it).

      If anyone I had a device in my hand that would allow me (in the UK) to see and talk to almost anyone in Africa, allow people in Africa to "virtually" attend weddings of family members in the UK, allow me to navigate the streets of Lagos (Nigeria) using visual moving maps with spoken instructions, hear music from anywhere in the world, and any time since before 1900, for nothing, get training on how to do almost anything for nothing, or even compute complex maths without me even having to touch the keyboard, then I would ask them for something of what they were smoking!

      Mobile phones with multi-core processors, touch screens, Skype and Youtube may appear obvious to us, but they surely were not in 1996 - when even land-line phone calls were so expensive we rarely called anyone, anywhere, if we could go there or write!

      Yes, I have used Google Maps in Lagos, and attended a wedding in London which relatives attended from Zimbabwe and America by Skype. I have drawn pictures on my screen with a mouse and used the results to cut parts from wood with a Laser - like something from a James Bond film!

      I remember solving differential equations using a mechanical calculator that, to divide, you wound a handle round to do repeated subtraction for each decimal place, and in 1996, I had seen military "moving map" displays, and had a good idea what they cost! I remember discussions of whether it was physically possible for memory to cost less than 1 cent per bit, and mainframes with a CPU clocked at one MHz! I remember watching the Beatles play live using 30 Watt amplifiers (1963), and going to the disco in 1970's clothes (look at the clothes in Soul Train videos).

      My grandfather's prediction may not be absolutely accurate, but, emotionally, it is pretty close!

      I am still waiting for my hover-board. Sharks with lasers, I can do without. Drones? I had a model plane in 1963 that flew by remote control. (Listening to DooWap as I write this).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:1890 to 1914 by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Netscape was the web. I was using the internet (and its predecessors a decade before that).

    3. Re:1890 to 1914 by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      The C64 came out in 1982. It is listed in the Guinness World Records as the highest-selling single computer model of all time, with independent estimates placing the number sold between 10 and 17 million units. Everyone I new had a computer in HS in he 1980's and BBSing was huge among all of my friends. For the last 30 years I have been kicking back, drinking beer and watching all the software that I used as a kid get hyped as the newest and greatest thing ever, now with electrolytes and UX (but the same thing really). Remember vax [mycray]$send? It allowed you to send one line of text to anyone on the system, or a list of people if you wanted. talk, phone, mail. The last "new" piece of software that I've seen is mathematica, and its basically a copy of MIT's thema mixed with LISP and a killer front end. That was 30 years ago.

      Luckily, or unluckily, I got tired of most of it long before the .com crazes and was able to avoid the downfalls.

    4. Re:1890 to 1914 by TheNinjaCoder · · Score: 1

      For those who can't remember, in 1996, few people had seen a computer

      Planet-wide this might be true, but for anyone in the UK/USA home computers such as the BBC Micro, Spectrum, C64, Apple II and their successors where available since the 80s. Anyone who went to school in the West would certainly have been seen computers in school by 1996. I agree with most of the rest though.

    5. Re:1890 to 1914 by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      In 1996, I started using my "car phone" inside the house by bringing in a car battery lol. And FIDONet was amazing, although the phone bills from it calling "local long distance" every night sucked.

    6. Re:1890 to 1914 by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      My grandpa bought a C64 in 1982. He never really used it a whole lot; but it was my doorway into IT for me. Sprites for graphics, those little books were you had to input little programs as part of the storyline...loading / saving programs on cassette tapes...

    7. Re:1890 to 1914 by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      I learned programming from typing in listings from Compute! magazine. The worst was before I had a tape drive and would type 'run' after 6 hours of typing and the whole thing would just lock up. Or turn funny colors and then lock up.

      But the things I learned on my little 8 bit computer got me more software and engineering jobs than did my electrical degree and also a patent on a sprite concept on some advanced graphics hardware. None of the other engineers were aware of sprites....

    8. Re:1890 to 1914 by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      Yeah, back in the 1960s we had the cloud, but it was called "time sharing". Over the years I've watched the "latest thing" slosh back and forth from edge to center based on where the previous paradigm had left too much compute power on the floor. Next up: Lots of browser based processing (fancy graphics etc.).

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  14. WWI and WWII by Morpeth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sad but I think true. The burst in technological, medical and scientific discovery during huge conflicts has been pretty remarkable. Humans, we are a strange beast.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:WWI and WWII by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Sad but I think true. The burst in technological, medical and scientific discovery during huge conflicts has been pretty remarkable. Humans, we are a strange beast.

      Don't forget the Cold War. Its why we had a space program.

    2. Re:WWI and WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      theoretical stuff happens mostly during peace because we have the time
      applied stuff burst in war times due to necessity and time constrains
      It doesn't mean those discoveries could/does not happen in peace time, is only that there are a lot less pressure to get it done in a hurry or to put money into it

    3. Re:WWI and WWII by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      "WAR! What is it good for?" my answer..."technological innovation!"

    4. Re:WWI and WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was those conflicts that led to advances in technology; battlefield injuries and their treatment led to prosthetics, plastic surgery, antibiotics, nursing and surgical methods. Military technology led to signal processing going from oceanography and calculating the tides, to sonar, radar and mobile communication.

    5. Re:WWI and WWII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a lot of disagreement on that point. TV was attracting all the nerds in the 30's. In "Trapped by Television" the bill collector thug is so excited by the deadbeat nerds TV system he signs up for it. WWII delayed development a lot. What it really does is change priorities. Some odd stuff gets elevated, but resources dry up and a lot is lost.

      I'm sticking with the 1880's as top decade. An engineer friend points out that there were nerds working alone who came up with a steam-power app that shaves a half-percent off fuel use, and lived comfortably on it the rest of their days. Original press on the telephone inventors showed that they were much loved.

      There is some good stuff in the 20th ct. My grandpa in ''27 was on the team that made the machine that found all the oil. I hear the guy who invented the infra-red air-to-air missile sorta did it alone in his garage, but the 20th ct. has lots of overwhelming heavy bad stuff.

      Nils K. Hammer

  15. isn't a debate that can be settled objectively. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    You can't be 'objective' without being a nihilist. All human value must be removed from the observation, or it's simply not objective... Maybe, if human values become universal, you might have something. Until then, it's nothing but a series of contradictions, decided by most brutal army.

    For us, it's pretty easy to say that the small electric motor brought on the "greatest age of innovation". We would have had the horseless carriage even without the internal combustion engine, in fact we did.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  16. Late 1990s by halfsad · · Score: 1

    Kozmo.com

    The defense rests.

  17. I think its an open ended thing by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    I think its an open ended thing, but if I had to confinge "innivation" to just western technology, I would say between the Age of Enlightenment (1600's), and WW2. I go back that far because that is when some truly free thinking began via the great western philosophers.

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:I think its an open ended thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well
      If you want to go back to when free thinking began then
      Ab l-Wald Muammad Ibn Amad Ibn Rud (Averroes) April 14, 1126 – December 10, 1198
      We can go a lot further than that if we want but then this guy spelled it fairly clear

  18. 2017-2024... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But only if Trump gets elected.

  19. obvious reply by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Ask Slashdot: What Was The Greatest Era Of Innovation?

    Whatever obscure era anyone is unlikely to suggest so I can appear smarter than everyone else.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  20. The biggest improvements involve the past sucking by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry, but you could live quite okay in 1980 without the PC, Internet, cell phones and whatnot. Go back and consider what life was like before you had phones, TV, cars, electricity and so on and you'll find many aspects of life sucked or was incredibly inconvenient. If I compare computer games made in 1985, 1995, 2005 and 2015 what will be the biggest difference? The first decade, of course. Cassette/LP to CD was a much bigger leap than CD to MP3/AAC, VHS to DVD was bigger than DVD to BluRay and so on. No internet to dial-up was bigger than dial-up to fiber. It's nice that we make things even better and more efficient and convenient, but there's a diminishing return. Which is not to say I feel we're done and won't make much more progress, but for the most part we're swapping out something that worked quite okay already for something better.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  21. You have to name times AND places by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A surge of innovation occurs when sociopolitical conditions, infrastructure, education and sources of wealth mesh in just the right way. Victorian Europe was one such time, when Britain, French and Germany blasted into the industrial age by feeding on each other's inventions. The US from 1865 to 1914 and 1942 to 1970 is another example. In these cases, war pushed technological development which nourished a generation of peace and civilian development to follow. Right now, it's China. Will India be next?

    1. Re:You have to name times AND places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also common to all those time periods you mentioned: they ignored intellectual property law. Makes you think, don't it?

    2. Re:You have to name times AND places by TheNinjaCoder · · Score: 1

      Right now, it's China.

      What world-changing thing has come out of China, in the current generation?

    3. Re:You have to name times AND places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What world-changing thing has come out of China, in the current generation?

      The entire world industrial production chain, contained in one single nation.

    4. Re: You have to name times AND places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really count as a single nation ?

  22. Communications by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    Of course everything builds on everything else but I have to think the biggest period of innovation has to be the mid 1800s when we started learning how to harness electricity and develop higher speed communications (telegraph, telephone, radio) up to around the 1950's when transistors and digital computers were developed.

    1. Re:Communications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After that the lawyers stepped in and started to strangle it... :-(

  23. The 1970s... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    Specifically, Intel and the invention and development of the microprocessor. Pretty much our entire world is now built upon that keystone.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
    1. Re:The 1970s... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The invention of the Laser Printer, so that computer operators (a drudge job) could relabel themselves 'IT' and push carts around the office with reams of paper and toner cartridges, while taking over the jobs of countless file clerks, etc.

      Translation: The microprocessor? You're kidding. Turn off the main switch in the server room and go out of doors for a bit.

  24. The invention of the iceless refridgerator by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    It changed how people bought, stored and prepared food.

    1. Re:The invention of the iceless refridgerator by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      toilet paper beats that, I'm telling you.

      Although to be honest, the one thing I can't figure out how to do without in case of the fall of civilization, are toenail clippers. I don't think people used knives to clip them.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re: The invention of the iceless refridgerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you using? Electronic toenail clippers? I use these little metal clippers that'll work just fine after the fall of civilization.

    3. Re: The invention of the iceless refridgerator by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I use these little metal clippers that'll work just fine after the fall of civilization.

      That works fine until they rust or get dull and you can't use them anymore, or you didn't pack them with you when you were fleeing from the rabid monkeys of diaspora. Let's be honest, there are plenty of reasons you wouldn't have toenail clippers with you.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:The invention of the iceless refridgerator by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... the one thing I can't figure out how to do without in case of the fall of civilization, are toenail clippers. I don't think people used knives to clip them.

      Actually, if you have a good whetstone (and know how to use it), you'll find that a small knife works just fine for trimming nails, both finger and toe. I've used my Swiss Army knife's small blade for just that purpose a few times while on vacation without a nail clipper. The small knife blade actually works better than the small scissors that are part of the package. You do need to be a bit careful, of course.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re: The invention of the iceless refridgerator by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I use wire cutters. Better than nail clippers. Learn blacksmithing. There are youtube videos on how to make them. Before it's too late.

    6. Re: The invention of the iceless refridgerator by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I use wire cutters. Better than nail clippers.

      Hmmm, that might actually work better than nail clippers.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:The invention of the iceless refridgerator by Whibla · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with your teeth?

    8. Re:The invention of the iceless refridgerator by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I'm not flexible enough to clip my toenails with my teeth

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re: The invention of the iceless refridgerator by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I use a scalpel with a no. 15 blade. I guess those won't exactly be plentiful come Mad Max time. Then again it'll probably the same for shoes, and IIRC going barefoot tends to keep them worn down anyway.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Innovation for what? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    The innovation during industrial revolution changed workers' lives, from agricultural work to industrial work. That was not more pleasant job, but since it produced a lot, workers got access to new goods and life standard. Further innovation reduced industrial work and increased less harsh office jobs.

    Now innovation is killing jobs while concentrating wealth. We still innovate, but innovation is less able to improve people's lives.

  26. 1900 to 1946 by clovis · · Score: 1

    1900 to 1946:
    Radio
    Television
    telephone
    antibiotics
    Women suffrage
    domestic refrigerators
    automobile
    air travel
    electricity distribution networks

    What we got in the 1970 to 2016 period is really cool, but it's just toys compared to the changes the first half of the 20th century brought us.

    1. Re:1900 to 1946 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women suffrage??? WTF?? Innovation??

      Do I smell SJW sauce? Me thinks so...

    2. Re:1900 to 1946 by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Radio: 1895 (first practical telegraphy transmitters and receivers)
      Telephone: 1876
      Automobile: 1886

      Apart from those, nicely done.

  27. I would have a hard time but by kilodelta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd have to say the invention of the transistor was the most transformative thing to happen to society. Prior we had vacuum tubes sure but they were power hungry devices that made portable electronics impossible.

    The transistor changed everything. It also allowed the device on which I'm posting to come about. A device admittedly a bit dated already but still enough to allow me to multi-task, listening to music, watching video, etc. And to continue the line of thoughts - the computer has invaded every aspect of life itself. All because of the invention of the transistor.

    1. Re:I would have a hard time but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we have it. The transistor started much of what we moderns call 'innovation' at least in the electronics/digital realm. Of course, the purists say nothing sounds like tubes regardless of what the damn o-scope says.

  28. Pre-history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would say that when the human race learned to make fire that we took ourselves off the natural evolutionary path; no other animal can make fire. Stone tools were also an incredible innovation that allowed us to take down larger prey animals and do a whole host of things we couldn't do before. There have actually been very few innovations over the millennia that have had as much impact: (in no particular order) written language, plumbing and sewers, the scientific method, antibiotics, permanent dwellings, refrigeration, farming and animal husbandry would all rank up there pretty high. Those all caused major leaps forward for our species in terms of longevity and sustainability, and only three of those happened in the last few hundred years.

    I guess it really boils down to how significant the innovations were to the survival of our species. The industrial revolution has brought as much suffering and death to the world as it has gains to our species. I'd call the last two hundred years of industrial-mechanical technology innovation close to a net zero with regard to overall benefit to the species, really.

    1. Re:Pre-history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I forgot to add mathematics to the list.

  29. BANG! by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    13.7 Billion years ago.

  30. Right.. by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

    ..now.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
  31. I'm an optimist - It is still to come by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

    I refuse to believe that the best is behind us.

  32. I would go to 1870 by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    That was an amazing era, life changed quickly, and in fundamental ways.

    > radio, turntables, automobiles, aircraft, and home refrigerators

    Also x-ray machines, movies, phonographs. And how could you forget: the tabulating machine.

    Go back to 1870, and you have telephone, and ticker tape.

    Electricity in homes also became practical during that era.

  33. First, ignore patent counts by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Seeing that I could probably patent wiping my ass and successfully defend it in a East Texas court, we can now ignore patent counts as even the vaguest measure of innovation. All they now measure is the number of strip mall lawyers who want to extort from anyone who even vaguely approaches innovation.

    I would measure innovation as something where a previous generation of maintenance people would not understand the new technology. A car mechanic from 1950 would have little problem working on a modern day gasoline car. He would quickly appreciate the elimination of the distributor cap, and love the power windows, but swapping out parts using tools like a socket set would not confound him for long.

    The same with any airplane mechanic from 1965 on. There is little difference between a DC-10 and a 787. Again the computers would be a little confusing, but the basic principles would largely be the same. Even the modern tools such as xrays, and other tools for examining deep hard to reach areas would make sense to him and solve problems he was having.

    But a microchip would blow the mind of an electrical engineer from 1950. Things like an iPhone would require that they pretty much redo the last two years of EE school to catch up.

    Obviously relativity would blow the mind of a physist of 1950.

    But even a doctor of 1950 would have little trouble catching up with modern techniques. I saw a wonderful bit in a program where a historian laid out some old Roman surgical tools and matched them up with their modern equivalents. They were little changed over the millennia. So while a Roman doctor might not be ready for a modern hospital, the 1950's one would probably require very little time and training to catch up. An MRI or CAT scan would simply be something better than an XRay.

    So by the standard of a past mechanic not being able to understand a subsequent innovation. I would say that between the US civil war and the end of the Korean War would be the period where the most innovation took place. This would be a time where new things came into existence that had little or no precedent. Plastics, much of modern chemistry, quantum physics, relativity, electricity in the home and all the devices that spawned from that, aviation, the beginnings of the computer age, transistors, the beginnings of the space age, nuclear age, TV, Radar, jets, antibiotics, wireless communications, the car. Then there are subtle innovations such as the industrialization of warfare.

    I don't think there is a century in human history with more innovation. Revolutionary and Napoleonic France was certainly a burst. The development of steam in England was a burst. But the above century was simply an orgy of innovation. Whole new technologies came out of pretty much nothing.

    Of course some innovations are more game changing than others, the printing press, the plough, agriculture, domestication of animals. As singular innovations they are world changing.

    But I would say the age of innovation ended with the Korean War. Someone transported in time from then until now would very rarely be baffled. If anything it would be cultural things that would amaze them. Computers in our pockets would probably be the most technologically amazing. But I don't think it would take too much training to show an 1955 accountant how to use Excel and email. They would probably nail Excel before mastering not hitting on the women in the office.

    One thing that isn't an innovation is Facebook.

    1. Re:First, ignore patent counts by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Obviously relativity would blow the mind of a physist of 1950.

      Aside from the fact that the expression didn't come into common use until about 20 years later, it sure would--he'd think you were a generation behind.

      (The concept of "relativity" as used in modern physics dates from 1906.)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:First, ignore patent counts by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      Meant to type 1850. Seeing that Einstein died around 55.

    3. Re:First, ignore patent counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the difference between a DC-10 and 787 is rather extreme.

      The controls don't work the same way at all - and repair couldn't be done. Trying to handle the fly-by-wire repair or even the engine would be far beyond him.

  34. Right Now by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    Historians will look back on our last four and next few generations and marvel at what we've accomplished.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  35. Late 1700s by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    That's when the innovation that allowed humanity to make a 5,000 year leap in progress in just around 200 years occurred.

    When the idea that the people granted limited power/permission to their government instead of the reverse became a founding principle of a nation. After that occurred humanity went from sails, horses, and carriages to jets, computers, and moon landings in just over 200 years.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    1. Re:Late 1700s by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that's just a tendency still, not that much of an accomplishment. Freedom from govt. tyranny is something many people have striven for, and there is a long history of push-pull success and failure. The French tried around the same time 200 years ago as the USians and failed in a short while, where the Americans tried and sorta got it running. Many other places have succeeded to one degree or another. Nation states are not a good 'container' to capture the framework within to found freedom from government, so there's also always that dialectic going on.

    2. Re:Late 1700s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you overestimate how much of a role the limits on government power played. Ignoring the fact that the US Constitution draws a lot from the 800 year old Magna Carta, and a big part of the economic growth powering the US was due to slave labor, the innovation you mention was also happening in Europe (especially Germany) just as rapidly as in America.

  36. When we learned to shape tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tools let us do everything. So xx millennia ago, when humans learned to create tools to do far more than we could do with our bare hands. That's what really got us going.

  37. 2020 to 2020 + a few months by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    2020, when AI computers capable of real thoughts, with IQ greater than what humans can perform, start to appear. Then it won't take long for human beings to be completely overwhelmed.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:2020 to 2020 + a few months by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:2020 to 2020 + a few months by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      This guy makes a very good argument why that won't happen by 2020.

      There are always clever people to teach us what we cannot do. Fortunately some even more clever and intuitive people find innovative and revolutionary ways to achieve what we were told is impossible to do.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:2020 to 2020 + a few months by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's not a very sophisticated argument. You probably didn't even read my link.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:2020 to 2020 + a few months by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      That's not a very sophisticated argument

      Agreed.

      You probably didn't even read my link.

      Read it quickly, and did it again just now. Interesting and documented article, thank you. However sticking to the brain structure, understanding what we don't understand off of it, evaluating its complexity (keeping CS complexity in mind), and, in brief, summarizing why the brain is way above nowadays computers / algorithms (which structure depends deeply upon what the hardware is capable of doing/being programmed) capacities is saying - besides being a valuable observation - "we cannot copy the brain functioning [today]". And this is certainly correct.

      But in a way this article proves my point: to achieve human IQ, some people will be interested in copying/mimicking the brain functioning - which is considered impossible today - and say: can't do. Some other people will be interested in achieving a high IQ through completely new different/innovative/revolutionary methods.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    5. Re:2020 to 2020 + a few months by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      But in a way this article proves my point: to achieve human IQ, some people will be interested in copying/mimicking the brain functioning - which is considered impossible today - and say: can't do. Some other people will be interested in achieving a high IQ through completely new different/innovative/revolutionary methods.

      None of which has anything to do with your 2020 projection, and that is the point.
      Sure it may happen in 2020, or 2120 or 2220. There is no reason whatsoever to pick one of those dates over any other.

  38. Slow Rise, Sudden Collapse by Ferocitus · · Score: 2

    500k BCE: 1st hominid catches on fire while dancing.
    1931: Electric guitar invented.
    1997: Zenith: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    2016: The End: Clinton, Trump, Radiohead.

    --
    USB, USB, USB!
  39. biggest period of innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd have to go with the period from the 1870's to about 1950 as being the most significant. In that time we see the telephone, electrification, radio, television, the many inventions of Thomas Edison, The automobile, the airplane, rocketry in its modern form, nuclear energy, the transistor, and digital computer and a whole lot of other stuff I probably missed. Nothing in the years since then can really said to be as important as these things.

  40. Society's greatest period... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so fundamental, and obvious, its no wonder no one's mentioned it...

    language/communication.

    It doesn't matter what language, how the grammar is constructed, or how it is used.

    Without language you do not have:
    History nor Abstract Thought
    Without those - you don't have anything else... including beer!

    Next time periods on the list are when we harnessed:
    Fire, Agriculture... then beer.

    But Beer is definitely in the top 5!

    FredInIT

  41. The Italian Renaissance by IHTFISP · · Score: 2

    ...when western civilization collectively pulled its head out of its ass from the superstitious dark ages and entered the age of reason.

    --
    Error: NSE - No Signature Error
  42. Early 20th C by tsotha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My grandfather didn't see a car until he was full grown, and before he died we had transistors, nuclear weapons, antibiotics, and had landed a man on the moon. It's not even close. People in the 1950s and 1960s thought we'd have ray guns and FTL ships by now because they were projecting from the state of innovation in their time.

  43. We're jaded by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously we're jaded; were we not, we'd recognize that since the advent of the internet, our ability to share data has revolutionized the world and our own capabilities. There is no real end to this in sight.

    Our greatest days are in front of us, not behind, as people truly begin to leverage the communication capabilities of the internet.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:We're jaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet is a giant failure and of little importance. It's hardly useful at all.

  44. Re:Warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a bad comment. Are you just learning to troll and/or not capable of making a witty remark?

  45. Wood and cloth airplanes to moon landing. by perpenso · · Score: 1

    It's not fair to compare a 100 year period to a 46 year period.

    No problem, we can compare a 50 year period. My grandfather would express a similar sentiment but he would use a starting point of the WW1 era airplanes he saw as a child that were little more than "kites with engines", made of wood and cloth, to the Apollo 11 moon landing as an endpoint. So if you want 46 years then we can go to a little past WW1, 1923. I think the aircraft nearly all people would see in the sky would still be the wood and cloth type, although I think a metal skinned monoplane first flew near the end of WW1.

  46. Wheel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    End of argument.

  47. That depends... by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

    ...on how you rate the innovations from the various eras.
    The development from mass starvation to beinga ble to feed the polulation is obviously more important to most people than the iPhone.
    So the question cannot really be answered, as each era haas had its innovations which were really important at the time, while may seem trivial now.
    It is also important to note that most innovations depend on previous innovations, so you rate one innovation without knowing what it is based on.

  48. Re:The biggest improvements involve the past sucki by arcade · · Score: 1

    Oh Kjella, how I disagree with you!

    The leap from LP -> Cassette -> CD -> Music DVD -> Music BlueRay/whatever are much smaller than the leap from [Physical media] -> [small convenient files]

    You can argue that the CD was digital and didn't require special ripping, you could just read the bits of'em and then play them from a computer. Except most computers didn't have 600MB drives in the 80s when the CDs started appearing. Those weren't common until around the mid 90s. And who would want to use their entire hard drive to rip a CD?

    The amazing jump was when we went from having a handful of music, an album or so, per physical unit .. to having a physical unit containing more music than you're probably ever gonna bother listening to. That was the huge leap.

    The same with VHS->DVD->Blueray. Whatever. It's a movie per physical unit. Now, if we just use a good codec for compression we can rip this into a nice mkv file with tons of subtitles and audio tracks for various languages - and store an amazing number of them on a simple USB stick. If we're not afraid of carrying around a little external usb drive, we can have *thousands* of them with us. Compared to one per unit with the 'old' style.

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  49. Multiple industrial revolutions by peter303 · · Score: 1

    1) coal and steam power, automated manufacturing, trains, steamboats, urbanization 2) oil and electricity, internal combustion, planes, radio, rockets, movies 3) compurt-aided everything, internet

  50. I would have divided 00s, 50s, etc by peter303 · · Score: 1

    - big jump in 1850s with railroads and modern corporation - last new machines jets, rockets, atomics, tvs, computers by 1950s. They've only changed in degree since then. - the worldwide internet and mobile computer came late 1990s and early 2000s -

  51. How do you define era? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    This article says an era is 50 years. Others mention broad periods like the stone age. I suggest an era is length of direct eyewitness: your grandfathers stories of his grandfather's life compared to your life. For the vast amount of human history, there'd be nearly no change during these five generations.

  52. Re:The biggest improvements involve the past sucki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supermarkets were around the 1980's, along with Visa, Mastercard, cars, petrol stations. There were warehouse stores back then.

    "Please wait 28 days for postage and packing". If you ordered something by post, that's how long it would take to arrive. You'd send them the order by post, along with the cheque and bankers draft. First week, you would worry if it had arrived, second week, you would wonder whether it would arrive, third week, you'd think you've probably lost the money, fourth week, you would have forgotten about the order. Then a mystery package would arrive.

    There were dial-up modems and BBS systems like BT Gold. But the maximum data transfer speed was around 9600 baud (1K/second). Even in the mid 1990's, you were lucky to have a 14K or 56K modem or ISDN (64K).

  53. The REAL History of Silicon Valley by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the history of the US is obscenely distorted by racist spin on the contributions of disadvantaged minorities such as George Washington Carver. But no one, till now, has revealed the truth behind the real founders of Silicon Valley and why all those Spoiled American Boomer Engineers who are flying their planes into IRS buildings and the like have only themselves to blame for the great need for more immigration to save the US economy.

    Read on for the revised history of Silicon Valley

    FAIRCHILD 50TH ANNIVERSARY PANEL

    John Hennessy : Welcome everyone. My name is John Hennessy and I’m delighted to invite you here to enjoy what I think will be a thrilling and certainly historical panel. The year is 1957. Santa Clara is still a largely rural county with a total population, a total population for the county, of less than five hundred thousand people. It is known by its nickname, the Valley of Heart ‘s Delight. The year before had been a momentous year for the area, in San Jose, IBM had produced RAMAC, the first random access disk drive, the first. And in Mountain View in 1956, the first company focused on semiconductors as a business, Shankar Semiconductor had been founded. It was headed by Rajiv Shankar, who, earlier at Bell Labs, had been one of the people most responsible for the invention of the solid-state transistor. Now Rajiv Shankar was a great scientist and a great theoretician, but it’s clear, he was a terrible manager. And it was this latter characteristic that led eight colleagues, now known as the Fairchild Eight, to depart Shankar Semiconductor in 1957 to found Fairchild Semiconductor. Tonight, we have three members of the original founding team of Fairchild Semiconductor. Chetan Gupta, a native of New York, who received a Bachelor’s Degree in mechanical engineering from City College . He ran the Fab at Fairchild. Meera Khosla, who received her PhD from MIT before coming west, at Fairchild, she directed the group that produced the first integrated circuit. And Vinod Patel, a native of California , who received his Bachelor’s from Berkeley and his PhD from Caltech. He ran the Research and Development group at Fairchild. Also joining our panel tonight is Aneesh Obama. In 1957, Aneesh Obama was a fresh MBA from Harvard working at the East Coast Investment Bank, Hayden Stone. Obama was instrumental in getting Hayden Stone to fund Fairchild Semiconductor. Fairchild Semiconductor was an innovator from the very beginning, the first company to focus on silicon, rather than germanium, as the basis for integrated circuit. They introduced the planar process to replace the then more popular but difficult to manufacture mesa transistor, and in 1958, produced the first commercially available integrated circuit. They went on to build a successful business before eventually being acquired by Schlumberger in 1979. And, of course, while these initial accomplishments were truly incredible, Fairchild’s equal or even bigger legacy has been the many companies that have come out of Fairchild Semiconductor subsequently. Meera Khosla left Fairchild to co-found Amelco Semiconductor in 1961, which became part of Teledyne. Also in 1961, Aneesh Obama co-founded one of the first venture capital firms and later became an early stage investor and board member at both Apple and Intel. Vinod Patel left with Barack Chopra to found Intel in 1968. And Chetan Gupta founded Xicor, now part of Intercell, when he departed. Other companies with roots at Fairchild include AMD , National Semiconductor and LSI Logic. In fact, I could go on listing the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of that Fairchild Semiconductor Company, but you certainly didn’t come here to hear me speak. Those accomplishments, the accomplishments of the individuals who founded and worked at Fairchild, helped this area earn its new nickname Silicon Valley , a name first applied in 1971, but in common use by the time I arrived here in 1977. Over time as integrated circuits became the primary building blocks

    1. Re:The REAL History of Silicon Valley by Ferocitus · · Score: 1

      White-space was among the greatest innovations.

      --
      USB, USB, USB!
  54. I say 1850 to 1910 by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    Look at what happened in this period:

    1. The rapid expansion of railroads worldwide.
    2. The development of electricity (both DC and AC).
    3. The development of the automobile.
    4. The development of the telegraph and eventually telephone.
    5. The development of radio.

  55. Nineteen eighty-four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During the last 70 years the ability of government to oversee and control everyone of its citizens has increased incredibly, thanks to the Internet (I mean the Morse telegraph), microphones (telephone) and cameras (television) beyond Orwell's nightmare. Good-bye, free wild west!

  56. About now-ish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say the greatest era of innovation is right now, and not only because they just transplanted a penis on a guy. Stem cell research is gong to be massive in a couple of years, we're just starting to dabble with non-reactional space flight, and on and on. If we don't blow ourself up, we might do great things.