Slashdot Mirror


Iran Is Arresting Models Who Pose Without Headscarves On Instagram (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Tehran cybercrimes court said the country has arrested eight people working for online modeling agencies deemed to be "un-Islamic." The women models were arrested for starring in photos on Instagram and elsewhere without wearing their headscarves, which has been required in public since 1979. A total of 170 people have been identified by investigators for being involved in online modeling, including 59 photographers and make-up artists, 58 models and 51 fashion salon managers and designers. The court's prosecutor Javad Babaei announced the the threats on TV, claiming modeling agencies accounted for about 20 percent of posts on Instagram from Iran and that they had been "making and spreading immoral and un-Islamic culture and promiscuity." He added, "We carried out this plan in 2013 with Facebook, and now Instagram is the focus."

19 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. There was a time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Iran wasn't so stuck in the past. But then again we have Mein Trump today so it can happen anywhere.

    1. Re:There was a time... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Iran wasn't so stuck in the past.

      Indeed. Before Iran became an Islamic Republic, it was an enlightened American client state, ruled by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a really great guy, who provided his people with the most modern instruments of torture, and housed his political prisoners in state of the art facilities. It is surprising how ungrateful the Iranian people are toward America, since we installed and unselfishly supported this wonderful regime for nearly three decades, and we gave them plenty of advice on how to build and run the prisons that kept all the troublemakers locked up. All we asked for in return was plenty of cheap oil.

  2. Re:Religion is what's 'immoral' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But they were breaking laws.

    Stupid laws, yes, but they were being broken.

  3. Are you trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    to turn the comments into a hate filled racist cesspool?

    There's no reason at all for this to be here. Just because it says instagram doesn't mean it's tech news and you can troll with this crap.

  4. Re:Perhaps... by tombak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But in iran this idea is codified in the legal system, its not a fringe idea expressed by a weirdo on an internet forum. That's the difference.

  5. Where's the beef? by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cops in the US will arrest women for going topless in public. What's the difference?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Where's the beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that they're not hunting down people who are topless in pictures posted online and seek them out and arrest them.

  6. Two wrongs don't make a right by presidenteloco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Both of those regimes are/were messed up in their own special way.

    It's too bad that sheeple put up with such tyranny, in either case.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Europe has more freedom than the US. We have paedophile political parties and stuff like that too. We also have much more positive freedom, that is where the state is obliged to protect people to some extent. The US kinda has it in some back-door ways, like the requirement to scrape people off the street after an accident and do the bare minimum require to keep them alive Since Europe has had problems with specific groups (e.g. Nazis) in the past, it is judged that on balance banning them in certain countries (Germany) is justified.

      US schools force children to pledge allegiance to the state. The pledge contains the phrase "under god", even though there is supposed to be separation of church and state. Don't tell me that the US has more political freedom than Europe, it's a gross over-simplification and untrue.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  7. Re:Religion is what's 'immoral' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As mentioned, this *is* a law. But laws can be changed.

    Women can be, and have been, elected to national political office in Iran. In fact, 84 of 435 (19.3%) of their national representatives are women. That isn't that great, admittedly, but at least it's--

    Oh wait, those are the US house of reps numbers. Our senate has 20 women out of 100 senators, roughly the same ratio.

    Meanwhile, Iranian women MPs are 21 of 290, or 7%. But before you argue how backwards that is compared to the US, reflect that it is roughly the representation the US had in the early 1990s.

    So there's hope for a more representational government, both for Iran and the US.

  8. Trump is the future by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Trump is the creation of people like you, that called every mild person you disagreed with Hitler, and thus were all vanquished.

    You got exactly what you wanted, all of the mild people banished, and replaced by hard men and women who punch back twice as hard when challenged because it's the only way to stand up to people calling you Hitler - they obviously will not listen to reason, only louder bluster.

    It's obviously what you wanted as you worked so hard for this to com to pass. Strange that you sound unhappy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: Trump is the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because Muslims are desperately trying to escape America... Not break in for welfare and jihad... Right, you fucking dipshit?

    2. Re:Trump is the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lol. Trump may not be Hitler, but to pin the rise of Trump on people who care about the common good? Nonsense. No, Trump is the creation of the rights brand of histrionic finger-waving. The Fox News dumbing down of America. The manufactured acceptance of Palin-style bullshit to feed your racist, bigoted agenda. Trump is your creation, your problem, and will be your downfall. I will laugh when he either loses or actually pivots so much to the left (where his policies have lain for the greater part of his life) that he may as well be a Democrat. (Which, of course, he is.)

      Lol.

    3. Re:Trump is the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gods I'm so glad to see you saying that.

      War Hero John McCain runs... we can't let him win or lose, we'd better say he's waging a WAR ON WOMEN and is SEXIST!
      http://inthesetimes.com/articl...

      Romney runs, a governor with a reasonably liberal history, especially regarding women's issues? One who wants to be SURE that women get representation in his possible future administration that he gets started, early, on the task of making a list of qualified women? That becomes "binders of women". Romney is waging a WAR ON WOMEN and is SEXIST!
      http://www.theguardian.com/wor...

      So, there's no longer any benefit to being a Republican who isn't sexist. Liberals will call every Republican sexist, no matter fucking what they do. Just go ahead and remove "is not overtly sexist" from the requirements list for being a Republican.

      These people have been BEGGING for Trump. Refuse to compromise. Call everyone a bigot who doesn't agree with you. Insist it is your radical SJW bullshit way or the highway. Deny any voice at all to moderates and conservatives alike. Make no room for them at any table, wage a goddamned war. Richly deserved IMO.

    4. Re:Trump is the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Trump isn't about being a conservative. He isn't running on a conservative platform. The Republicans who voted for him aren't voting for him because they think he's some right wing conservative. He just smashed the shit out of every right wing conservative in the fucking party, some of them so hard that they are refusing to support their own fucking nominee. The people who vote for Trump won't be disappointed with Trump, and is it really pivoting left if he doesn't have a right wing position to start with? All Trump has to do is not take guns and build a wall, and he's in for 8 years straight and will be more beloved than any Republican since Lincoln.

    5. Re:Trump is the future by silentcoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure about Hitler - but comparing him to Verwoerd is a spot-on accurate comparison - except that the latter was a LOT more eloquent.

      The thing is - as somebody who lived under the only fascist government to ever rule a country for a significant period WITHOUT being simultaneously at war with major powers... I heard every variation of fascist rhetoric. From the absolute hatred of communism to blaming other races for your hardships, blaming liberals for every evil in the world and filling people with fear of the brown-boogeyman under the bed and the red boogeyman next door.

      Trump isn't LIKE the fascists I lived under, he IS them. If he had run in a South African election in 1976 it would have been a fucking landslide victory for him.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    6. Re:Trump is the future by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Liberals will call every Republican sexist, no matter fucking what they do

      That's easy to fix: support paid family leave, childcare assistance, guaranteed maternity leave, promise to leave abortion rights untouched and fight AGAINST state governments that try to restrict it, stick to the small government thing enough to get the fuck out of women's wombs entirely in fact - leave that between her and her doctor, and stop fighting against letting women have ready access to birth control, make ending rape culture a goal - and that includes ensuring every rapist gets the punishment he deserves and actually BAN victim blaming as an attempted defense in court.

      Republicans have been consistently on the wrong side of every one of these issues and every now and then they go even further and pull a Todd Aiken on top of it. Those things are what is described as the war on women. You will NEVER escape that accusation unless you change on ALL those things. You cannot stop being accused of a war on women unless you stop FIGHTING one.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    7. Re:Trump is the future by utahjazz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      These people have been BEGGING for Trump.

      Yes, and they succeeded. Now they will win the presidency by a landslide, and probably take back the senate too.

      Richly deserved IMO.

      Exactly how are liberals suffering from Trump's success? It's the best thing that ever happened to them. Hillary goes to bed every night praying for Donald's continued good health.

  9. Re:Perhaps... by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good comparison. Obviously the sad puppies or whatever are directly comparable to groups that stone women for things that aren't even crimes here. Everyone who doesn't agree with you is Hitler, right?