Uber Knows Exactly When You'll Pay Surge Pricing (yahoo.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Uber has figured out exactly when you are more likely to pay double or triple the cost of your ride: when your phone battery is low. Uber's head of economic research, Keith Chen, recently told NPR on an episode of The Hidden Brain podcast that people are willing to accept up to 9.9 times surge pricing if their phones are about to go dead. Data about user batteries is collected because the app uses that information to know when to switch into low-power mode. The idea being: If you really need to get where you're going, you'll pay just about anything (or at least 9.9 times anything) to ensure you're getting a ride home and won't be stranded. A person with a more fully charged device has time to wait and see if the surge pricing goes down.The company insists that it won't use this information against you.

Comments

Very smart of them, if tru

[mi]

If you really need to get where you're going, you'll pay just about anything (or at least 9.9 times anything) to ensure you're getting a ride home and won't be stranded

Good for Uber, if really true.

In a free market — and this aspect of it remains reasonably free in the US — the price of everything is the amount a buyer is willing to pay.

Keep your batteries charged.

Re:Very smart of them, if tru

[gurps_npc]

You are violating one of the most important principles of the free market - free exchange of information. Go read Wikipedia, it will explain how free exchange of information is essential to a free market.

What's going on here is that one side has all the information and the other side is blind, depending on Uber to be honest.

Uber has no business learning about the state of your phone battery. It doesn't need it and it's YOUR private, personal confidential information that poor software design let Uber steal. They don't tell you about the desperate need for cash by their drivers because their rent is due and they would accept ANY fair.

Uber is not being 'good', it knows that if they unethically use your private information they have unethically gathered, then it will piss us off enough to pass laws preventing them from gathering it.

The price of everything is the amount a buyer is willing to pay AND a seller is willing to sell when competition keeps prices fair and information is fairly and ethically exchanged.

When you ignore the rules that undermine capitalism, you aren't being capitalistic, you are being a thief. And people like you is why socialism has grown so popular - when you cheat the way you want to, it upsets people and they demand government intervention.

Re:Very smart of them, if tru

[TheGratefulNet]

I would argue NO app needs to know the level of my battery.

this is meta data. should I have to explain that to a smart guy like you?

if I'm powered from battery or ac, that is meta data. it means other things. add it up.

yes, its private and yes, its WRONG to glean that because the os allows it. the os is a piece of shit anyway and that info should not be leaked to apps.

yes, we live in a world where we now need to think and rethink about every bit of info and how it can (and will) be used against us.

this is our info and its being used against us. how is that not a privacy issue, when they used priv'd info to gain an advantage over me?

Uber and Lyft - hitchhiking for money!

[mmell]

Let's face it - the reason Uber and Lyft are so cheap is because they aren't regulated. Just like a hitchhiker, you're basically at the mercy of the guy with the car keys. Being not regulated (like, say, a taxi service) means Uber and Lyft can do all sorts of schiesty stuff and not be in violation of the law.

I can't wait until they start doing things like "Oh, you're in a bad part of town - you're going to pay even more!", "Oh, you're leaving an event of some kind - you're going to pay even more!", "Oh, you're a woman/ethnic minority/religious minority - . . ." . . .

Sorry to hear about you're driver taking you for a ride - that's what you paid for, right?

Re:Uber and Lyft - hitchhiking for money!

[Anonymous Coward]

The problem is that the train, bus, taxi and your friend all need to obey the law, otherwise, they are in trouble.

Uber's strategy is to play fast and loose with the law, pretending that they are/aren't a taxi company and that their drivers are/aren't contractors or that the do/do not work for Uber at all and such crap, while they become too large to dislodge from wherever they landed. Notice that since Uber doesn't obey the law (because they keep redefining what they actually are) they don't need to deal with costs that other entities have to deal with. They have an unfair (as in, illegal) advantage.

In a functioning society, things aren't supposed to work like this. I'm glad that many places are pushing back and forcing Uber to play by the rules, or creating rules that allow everyone to play fairly.

Re:Uber and Lyft - hitchhiking for money!

[rockmuelle]

No, they're cheap because they're burning through piles of cash from their investors and a (limited, but still large) pool of drivers willing to work a few months before they realize they got a bum deal. Both will run dry, at which point the TNC experiment will end.

For a really good discussion on the economics from the driver's side, check out any of the recent reddit threads in Austin discussing Uber and Lyft's decision to cut off 10k drivers and split town. Here's one to get you started: https://www.reddit.com/r/Austi...

-Chris

Re:Uber and Lyft - hitchhiking for money!

[rockmuelle]

"And why do you think they're going through the effort to keep the prices low?"

To wipe out the competition and then raise prices when there's no more competition. Pretty much what every good capitalist wants to do.

The only competition Uber and Lyft they have at the low end of price spectrum is each other. Of course, they need each other in the same way Intel needs AMD - to demonstrate to regulators that they aren't a monopoly. The competition they need to wipe out is taxis and other TNCs (transportation network company) that pay fair wages and follow the laws. Wiping out taxis is pretty easy, since there have been structural issues with the taxi business for decades. Wiping out the other TNCs is going to be a little harder since the new services are demonstrating that you can run a TNC that follows the law and pays its drivers a reasonable wage.

As Austin will likely demonstrate, the race to the bottom in compliance and wages being run by Uber and Lyft is probably not the real race to provide alternatives to taxis. Business that respect their drivers, communities, and passengers will emerge as the winners here.

-Chris

Pfft. Okay...

[SeaFox]

A company is promising they wont take advantage of a way to charge you 10x more for their service?
Is there a way to turn off the battery monitoring on their app by any chance?

Comment removed

[account_deleted]

Comment removed based on user account deletion

Ahem

[Cro Magnon]

"The company insists that it won't use this information against you."

Heh! There goes another keyboard!