Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Stops Giving Refunds When an Item's Price Drops After You Purchase It (recode.net)

Amazon has for years issued refunds to users when the price of an item drops after they've purchased it. But lately the e-commerce giant hasn't been doing that on a number of products, except for televisions, according to price-tracking companies. Recode reports: The move may have something to do with the rise of startups that track prices for Amazon customers and automatically request refunds when appropriate. One of them, a Santa Monica-based startup called Earny that is backed by the startup incubator Science, first pointed out the change. Earny scours a customer's email inbox for digital receipts, and then continuously checks the price on a retailer's website to see if it drops.

164 comments

  1. What? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Earny scours a customer's email inbox for digital receipts...

    Yeah.... no.

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Same here. No! I am NOT giving you access to my inbox.

    2. Re:What? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure lots of people do, though. Heck, look at all the people who don't even blink an eye before allowing Facebook full access to the contact list they have on their personal computer - and that's not even promising to save them a few cents.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:What? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Yeah.... no.

      How about you create a second dedicated e-mail account, so you give Earny the creds to a different account instead of your main one, and setup rules to auto-forward e-mails that you want earny to take a look at?

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, make an account for Amazon purchases so that if you start receiving spam, you know Amazon sold your email address.

    5. Re:What? by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just setup a gmail account specifically for amazon.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    6. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought middle earth dwarfs were just in the movies.

    7. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hung like a tuna can.

    8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello there fellow non gmail/hotmail/yahoo mail user.

    9. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure lots of people do

      Yes, they're called GMail/Outlook users.

    10. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just setup a gmail account

      Did you miss the part about NOT wanting a continually scanned inbox?

    11. Re:What? by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Why? Amazon is doing this because of 'Earny'. Amazon is not the one scouring your mailbox. However, it is amazon's fault for playing with variable pricing schemes. Earny showed up to even the playing field.

    12. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which is why you don't let them scan your normal email account, and create a sandboxed account instead. Perhaps you should have paid attention to the words you cropped out:

      specifically for amazon

    13. Re:What? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I have my own domain with unlimited aliases and filter my mail on my Linux box. So here is what I do:

      I use e.g. Slashdot.orrg@example.com. This has several advatnages
      1) It is easy to filter. I have separate mailboxes for different types of sites. e.g. purchases, banking, serious sites, fun sites, ...
      2) Easy to see who sells or gives away your email. (Looking at you ebay) regardless if it was opt in or opt out.
      3) Easy to verify if it is spam. And this is the most import one for me.

      That means I have always a dual verification and it means that if there is an issue, I just cancel the alias (e.g. ebay as I was getting a LOT of spam and will not be working with them again)

      For me the most important part is that I can easily verify if it is e.g. my bank that is sending me something or if it is a spammer that emulates the email and it was not filtered out by the standard spam filters.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:What? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part about NOT wanting a continually scanned inbox?

      No, it was simply dismissed as stupid when all that is needed is an inbox which is not used for any other purposes. Your idea was bad and you should feel bad

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:What? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Gmail allows you to also do this even if you don't have your own domain. You can create virtual email addresses in the format of username+whatever@gmail.com. If the "whatever" account ever gets compromised, spammed, etc just set up an filter to automatically delete it (or at least categorize it as spam). It'll still show up in your inbox normally so you're not having to manage multiple email accounts either.

    16. Re:What? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      Which is why you don't let them scan your normal email account, and create a sandboxed account instead. Perhaps you should have paid attention to the words you cropped out:

      specifically for amazon

      Exactly. A person simply needs to set up sandboxed e-mail accounts for different things. That's what my wife and I do... and she isn't a techie. Non-tech people typically do not think that way, which is understandable (and precarious). But once you explain the benefits, they jump right. It is (supposed) tech people who do not think that way that baffles me.

    17. Re:What? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Just setup a gmail account specifically for amazon.

      Word. That's what I do: one for shopping (amazon, ebay, paypal), one for social media (facebook and linkedin), and one for personal usage, and another my wife and I share for school activities, all gmail. A couple for MS tool registration at hotmail/msn, and another at yahoo that I use whenever I suspect someone is trying to spam me (said account is aptly named is spirit of one's rear orifice.) Each with a different password (which is a burden, but not an impossible one.)

      For the general population, two accounts typically suffice. And once you explain the benefits to a non-techie, they are quick to adopt the scheme... or so has been my experience.

    18. Re:What? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      But the spammer can/will easily filter out the +whatever part.

    19. Re:What? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1. Having access to who I know is not at all the same risk scenario as having access to what I spend and by extension what I own, my home address, and that's just assuming they ignore the rest of the emails and don't also scour the banking password reset links or any other things that are sensitive and really shouldn't be sent via email in the first place.

      2. Saving a few cents does not compare to providing a large scale service for keeping up with what is happening in your social group. Despite what Slashdot users think, and the general corporate dickery that goes on behind the scenes at Facebook, the service actually provides something of real value to users.

    20. Re:What? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Why? Amazon is doing this because of 'Earny'. Amazon is not the one scouring your mailbox. However, it is amazon's fault for playing with variable pricing schemes. Earny showed up to even the playing field.

      A condition was proposed where the OP didn't want his mailbox scanned 24x7. A work around was proposed to send the emails that the 3rd party wanted to scan, emails from Amazon but scanned by Earny, to a sandbox account specifically setup for that purpose. This would allow the user to use Earny (or would have, RIP Earny) while maintaining as much privacy as possible while still benefiting from the Earny app.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    21. Re:What? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Gmail allows you to also do this even if you don't have your own domain. You can create virtual email addresses in the format of username+whatever@gmail.com. If the "whatever" account ever gets compromised, spammed, etc just set up an filter to automatically delete it (or at least categorize it as spam). It'll still show up in your inbox normally so you're not having to manage multiple email accounts either.

      Yea but a lot of sites throw a hissy fit if you try to use one an address with a + in it. Annoying as hell since it's a perfectly valid email address if you go by the published standards. Plus it doesn't fix the OP's issue of not having Earny or some other app like it scan his entire email box looking for Amazon purchase emails.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  2. Why would you ever give that refund? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you bought before a price drop, deal with it.

    Too many price drops and your storefront starts to look like Steam: people will only buy when the product is on sale for 50% or more.

    1. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      If you bought before a price drop, deal with it.

      No kidding. I wonder what a stock broker would tell you if you tried that.

    2. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I shop, all the sellers deliver the product at the delivery day's price if it's the same or lower than the price at order, and at the ordering price if the delivery day's price is higher. If it's 50% down at the delivery, I pay just that price. No refunds or any other empty paper pushing necessary. Refunds against competition is rarer. I would be offended by Amazon's need of customer initiated refund when I'm used to the current system.

    3. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      If you bought before a price drop, deal with it.

      I agree- unless we're talking a huge drop, just suck it up. I mean, you were willing to pay for it then, but you're going to have a meltdown and your kids will starve because now it's 50 cents cheaper?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by toonces33 · · Score: 1

      I am still waiting for Apple to have a 50% off sale on sales of their shares..

    5. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      If you bought before a price drop, deal with it.

      Too many price drops and your storefront starts to look like Steam: people will only buy when the product is on sale for 50% or more.

      Depends on the return policy. Many B&M stores will price match for the same period as their return policy, otherwise people would just return the item and repurchase it anyway. Amazon charges return shipping if it's not due to a problem on their part (damaged, DOA, wrong item, etc) so it's got a bit of an advantage there.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    6. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He might tell you that he gets his commission whether you're buying or selling.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the return policy. Many B&M stores will price match for the same period as their return policy, otherwise people would just return the item and repurchase it anyway. Amazon charges return shipping if it's not due to a problem on their part (damaged, DOA, wrong item, etc) so it's got a bit of an advantage there.

      Right up until the cost of returning the item is less than the price difference.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    8. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      well, the next move for Amazon will be to charge you the higher of the two prices [the price when you clicked "buy" and the current price when the order is fulfilled], using the claim to charge the higher amount later being that the contract was only entered into/accepted once the order shipped. And that you agreed to it via clause 18.3.6.b.12 of their TOS, which they notified you that they had updated via their email to you saying "The TOS for Amazon has been updated. Log into your Amazon account to accept the new TOS and then read the 427 page document".

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    9. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. See my post above, 41€ is an outrageous price difference, even if someone did not like to hear the truth and gave a -1.

    10. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      The thing is, the prices usually drop almost immediately after you buy something from Amazon. Also if you add something to your Cart, go away for a few hours and come back, the price is usually higher.

    11. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The prices change a lot over time. You can use camelcamelcamel to track the historic prices of items. I suspect that this is actually becoming a problem for Amazon: I held off buying something recently for two weeks waiting for Amazon to lower their price back to where it was when I first looked. They didn't, but one of their competitors did in this time so I bought it from them instead.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:Why would you ever give that refund? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      I love them. When I want something but don't care when I get it then I just set an alert with camelcamelcamel with a price near the historic low.

  3. welcome to the club, amazon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    between this, slave-like worker conditions in warehouses, and the increased number of items that can only be purchased by prime members, you are now in the evil club with google, facebook and microsoft. way to go!

    1. Re:welcome to the club, amazon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was what did it for you?

      You belong at Walmart.

    2. Re:welcome to the club, amazon.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      slave-like worker conditions in warehouses

      If you can legally quit, then it is not "slave-like". Slavery is not synonymous with "requires hard work".

    3. Re: welcome to the club, amazon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but at the risk of being starkly economic and leaving morality out for the sake of argument: slavery is an investment for the slave owner. It's in your best interest to not work slaves to death unless they cost you nothing, like prisoners. It's in your best interest to keep them reasonably fed and housed. (Yes, slave owners tend not to be the brightest or most moral lot but what I said is true in strict economic terms)

      None of that applies to today's race to the absolute bottom in wages and working conditions. What we have today is actually cheaper than slavery for employers.

    4. Re: welcome to the club, amazon.. by JonBoy47 · · Score: 1

      What are these items that can only be purchased if you have Prime?

    5. Re: welcome to the club, amazon.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      None of that applies to today's race to the absolute bottom in wages and working conditions.

      Working in a modern warehouse is nowhere near the "absolute bottom", and claiming that it is worse than 19th century plantation slavery is idiotic.

    6. Re:welcome to the club, amazon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you can legally quit

      It's unclear whether or not you can...

    7. Re:welcome to the club, amazon.. by Bowlich · · Score: 2

      In state where we've essentially outlawed any attempts at subsistence living? Yeah, go ahead and try to "quit" working and see how long before they drag you into court for something you've violated.

    8. Re:welcome to the club, amazon.. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      Yeah, go ahead and try to "quit" working

      You don't have a right to live without supporting yourself, but you can still quit any particular job. If there is no other job to your liking available, you can work for yourself. My housekeeper runs her own business. She comes for about three hours once a month, and I pay her $120. That is $40/hour for a no-skill no-education job with flexible hours. If she cleans two houses a day, she can clear $60k/year. I tried to refer her to a friend, but she said she is too busy to take on new clients. I thought about explaining to her that turning down customers was bad business, and she should raise her prices instead, but then I realized that wasn't in my best interest.

    9. Re: welcome to the club, amazon.. by vux984 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Working in a modern warehouse

      Where amazon was paying paramedics to pick people up after they collapsed rather than fix or address the root problems...

      I'm still not going to go as far as to say it compares with plantation slavery; but the conditions amazon was imposing were WAY out of line; and there was real basis for the comparison:

      Amazon 'modern warehouses', where you are worked until you collapse.

    10. Re: welcome to the club, amazon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need better labor laws. Some ideas...

      Longer breaks (perhaps 15 minutes every four hours)

      Paid 30 minute lunches for those working 8+ hour shifts per 24 hour day.

      11 hours off at night (24 hour period) under penalty of 1.5x overtime. For those earning under $25/hour.
      E.g, an employee working a 14 hour shift would gain overtime until 11 hours off occurs.
      Restaurant manager works from 9am to 11pm. Comes in next day at 9am. This is 10 hours off, and would be in violation. So, the "penalty" would be that this employee earns 1.5x overtime until receiving a solid 11 hours off.
      (Exceptions for emergency workers, such as firefighters, perhaps. I don't know.)

      Going through security procedures probably should count as "on the clock".

      An extra 15 minutes at lunch (unpaid) if you have to walk more than five minutes to get to a designated eating area.

      No less than 60% paid sick leave (one sick hour for every 50 hours worked; tied to the employee, not the job; complex calculations if one's income changes; done via payroll taxes).

      Same as above, but 100% for vacation days. (1:50 hours means about 5 fully paid days off per year.)

      As for the Amazon story...
      I think they should...
      Offer price-drop refunds if it's between purchase and being shipped out. Always.
      Offer price-drop refunds post-shipping, but limited to once per let's say 3 months period to prevent abuse.
      Now, perhaps the refund should be in the form of a gift certificate? That way the money isn't completely lost.

    11. Re:welcome to the club, amazon.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you can legally quit, then it is not "slave-like". Slavery is not synonymous with "requires hard work".

      Strongly disagree. If the work takes a greater toll on you than it pays off, and you don't have skills for better work and/or there is no better work available, then it is slave-like. If the work doesn't actually pay enough to live on with proper health, then it is slave-like. This is actually a better deal for employers than slavery, because they don't have to buy the workers and they don't even have to pay them enough to live on. An actual slave owner had at least a slight motivation to keep his slaves alive and healthy. Amazon and Wal-Mart have little to none. They have no reason whatsoever not to use once and discard.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:welcome to the club, amazon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes you're technically correct, but when you set the bar to "when you can legally quit...", you're not exactly setting a high bar.

  4. So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    to ask for the refund, however, when a larger number of customers started asking for the refund, then it was no longer cost-effective.

    1. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it was no longer cost-effective.

      Huh, that's odd.

      When I passed this justification through the reality engine, it translated into "Fuck You. That's why."

    2. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      to ask for the refund, however, when a larger number of customers started asking for the refund, then it was no longer cost-effective.

      I agree. Once of those things we lost due to other companies leaching off of them.

      If that happened for every sell, then there would never be price drops.

      My price doesn't go up if the cost is raised. Why should it go down if lowered?

    3. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because pretty much every other company in the world does it? Because if not, I'm going to return the one I had and order it again?

    4. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by dj245 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      to ask for the refund, however, when a larger number of customers started asking for the refund, then it was no longer cost-effective.

      I agree. Once of those things we lost due to other companies leaching off of them.

      If that happened for every sell, then there would never be price drops.

      My price doesn't go up if the cost is raised. Why should it go down if lowered?

      In general, I agree with you, but Amazon has set up a system where it is easy to play games with pricing. I've seen differences depending on if I am logged in or not, which account I am logged in under, whether I am logged in on a "prime" account or not, and other shenanigans. Prices seem to sometimes be higher or lower depending on how long something has been in a wish list or cart. Amazon and their vendors are certainly gaming the system (which they created for their own benefit) and showing no mercy, fairness, or common courtesy in the pursuit of separating me from my hard-earned money. You can be assured that these pricing games are not for your benefit. In that kind of environment, why wouldn't a person use every means available to try to get a the best possible deal?

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    5. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Because pretty much every other company in the world does it?

      So if you went to the gas station the day after you bought a tank, and they lowered their price by $0.02, you show them your receipt from the day before, and they give you cash back? No? Almost nobody does a self-price-match after the sale.

    6. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the world of dynamic pricing. Once all the on-line retailers have a full profile of you and your spending habits, expect to see higher prices if you have a good income and don't clip coupons. It's kind of like appliance repairmen who jack up their estimates if you live in a nice house in a nice neighborhood.

    7. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Fuck You is why, then why did the previous policy exist?

      Either Amazon suddenly got a little eviller, or some other condition changed.

      I think the "this is costing us more than it used to" explanation fits the facts pretty well. It used to be segmented marketing, where they charge people depending on how much they care/complain. If you're a squeaky wheel, you get oil. If you're a silent wheel, no oil for you. Then robots came in to automate squeaking, independent of how much the user cares. You can't do segmented marketing when the segments all merge.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    8. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Fuck You is why, then why did the previous policy exist?

      Clearly today's generation never taught you the golden rule. Yesterday is irrelevant.

      Either Amazon suddenly got a little eviller, or some other condition changed.

      Yeah, I guess it's impossible to think that companies would change policies or priorities. Ever.

      ...Then robots came in to automate squeaking, independent of how much the user cares...

      Translation: Fuck You. That's why.

    9. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I would prefer having lower upfront costs than access to this perk, which is more like some kind of lottery that unnecessarily complicates their business model.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    10. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody does a self-price-match after the sale.

      Which is fine - if they're not claiming that they do.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by twotacocombo · · Score: 2

      So if you went to the gas station the day after you bought a tank, and they lowered their price by $0.02, you show them your receipt from the day before, and they give you cash back?

      Because you can't return gas, ever. You can't just pour your gas back into the storage tank and demand a refund. Gas is also a product with inherent price volatility, and it never goes on sale; same as the stock market. The price matching many stores do is to avoid the hassle of you returning that (returnable) item and then immediately repurchasing it at the sale price.

    12. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For consumables, no. However for items like hardware and tools if the item went on sale the day after I bought it the store will give me the partial refund as it saves them the extra work of them giving me a full refund when I return it and having to restock the shelf while I just buy it again at the new price.

    13. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      If Fuck You is why, then why did the previous policy exist?

      To keep prices higher. Customers are more willing to buy and less price sensitive if the believe they can still take advantage of a better deal. As a result, they tend to do less price research. Companies, OTOH, know if they drop prices they will not get purchases from their competitors customers who will simply get a price match and sell products for less to boot, thus making less money. Price matching is a way to signal you will not start a price war but will hurt your competitor if they start one. A a result everyone offers price matching and no one cuts prices. Most price matches exclude limited quantities, black Friday's, percent off etc. which allow companies to do promotions without starting price wars.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    14. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems like abuse of the system to me. Amazon had that policy so that people could feel confident shopping there, knowing that if the price dropped then they could go back and get the difference. Instead, a cottage industry formed specifically to get people all of the price drop refunds any time they happen. That wasn't why Amazon had the policy to start with. If that was what Amazon wanted to do then they would have automatically credited every account every time a price was lowered. That was not their sales plan, the policy was there so that you don't need to wait for a sale. If you buy something that goes on sale next week then instead of feeling burned Amazon can generate a little customer goodwill and loyalty by giving you the difference if you ask. It wasn't supposed to be an automated process.

      Personally, if I was in the place of whoever was making those decisions at Amazon I would enjoy changing our policy to put out of business a bunch of companies that I see as freeloading off my customers.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    15. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I think the "this is costing us more than it used to" explanation fits the facts pretty well.

      I think it's more along the lines of "we dropped the price and almost immediately got 10,000 refund requests from the same IP address, let's find out who is trying to take advantage of this policy."

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    16. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Moral: if your business model is based entirely on exploiting another company's goodwill, you're screwed. And deservedly so.

    17. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...I think the "this is costing us more than it used to" explanation fits the facts pretty well....

      Built into its pricing model, Amazon had costs for the "refund if the price goes lower" policy. Once too many people started obtaining those refunds, then the cost of that policy exceeded the budgeted costs, and Amazon started to lose money (or not make enough money) on the transactions. So Amazon discontinued the policy, figuring that they would not lose enough business to outweigh the cost of continuing the policy.

      .
      It's Retail Business 101.

    18. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Jiro · · Score: 1

      Also, gas stations don't charge you more if you're a repeat customer or if you are wearing expensive clothing that shows you're a richer person than the customer who comes in in two minutes. Amazon does the electronic equivalent. Amazon takes advantage of computers to wring every cent out of customers by violating our expectations of how stores normally sell things; what's so bad about violating their expectations in response? Especially if we're just violating their expectations by actually claiming the price that they say we're entitled to claim.

    19. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as far as I know you have no *right* to give something back after buying in a brick-and-mortar store (some do anyway, but you have no right to do so - you could see the product before buying. Online buys are something different in germany, *there* you have two weeks). Or is this different in the US?

    20. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If Fuck You is why, then why did the previous policy exist? Either Amazon suddenly got a little eviller, or some other condition changed.

      Amazon is getting eviler. All that talk of excellent customer service is a thing of the past. Anybody notice that free shipping suddenly increased from $35 to $49 without warning or notice, and at the same time a significant number of products were suddenly changed to only available for Prime customers? Among their other problems, Amazon desperately wants to become Costco and force everyone to join their club to be able to buy anything...

      Refunds for defective or misrepresented products used to be trivial. But now when you have to return an item to Amazon, even when it is utterly DEFECTIVE, you'll be notified of a refund, but you have to look close to notice they only returned about 90% of the price you paid. If you complain, you can get the difference refunded, but even then, I've occasionally seen the second refund still come up a bit short! And this is my experience as a frequent customer for years, which they presumably want to keep happy. Others might not get as much traction when they complain.

      This is even worse of a problem when compounded with Amazon Warehouse deals, where they resell returned products for a small discount. They very frequently resell defective items, and blatantly upgrade the condition a step or two... "Like New" items should NEVER be dented and cracked, but Warehouse Deals pulls that con all the damn time, and people who want to save $2 apparently fall for it.

      These issues can all combine to make a perfect shit-storm... Place a $50 order from Amazon with one item from Warehouse deals. Used item is not in condition described, and quite defective. Amazon will NOT let you EXCHANGE a Warehouse item, so refund is you ONLY option. Refund just for the item will come up several dollars short, AND the removal of your item from the order will drop you below the free shipping threshold, giving them another excuse to deduct a big chunk of money from your item refund.

      Amazon is happy to hammer the 3rd party sellers that use their website... If they aren't absolutely perfect, they get heavily penalized. But Amazon itself is very quickly becoming shady as hell.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      as far as I know you have no *right* to give something back after buying in a brick-and-mortar store

      This might just be one of those things that varies from place to place a tiny bit. Do you know where he lives?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Xest · · Score: 1

      Problem is for Prime customers it's going to cost them more anyway.

      The problem is with Prime you get free returns and free delivery, so if something goes down in price after you buy it you can just return it for free and buy it at the cheaper price with free next day delivery.

      I always figured Amazon did this because the alternative of having to refund the higher price, sell at the lower price AND pay for restocking, collection, and redeliver was a much worse option costing them even more.

    23. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's like advertising an all-you-can-eat buffet, and then welshing on it when a group of big fat bastards turns up - waving an offer around until somebody takes up on it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Refunds for defective or misrepresented products used to be trivial. But now when you have to return an item to Amazon, even when it is utterly DEFECTIVE, you'll be notified of a refund, but you have to look close to notice they only returned about 90% of the price you paid.

      This has literally never happened to me on Amazon, whereas on eBay I constantly have problems with it, e.g. not getting shipping refunded on defective items. The last time it happened, the guy literally dicked me out of $1.20 or so. I left him negative feedback, which was more satisfying than getting that money back.

      This is even worse of a problem when compounded with Amazon Warehouse deals, where they resell returned products for a small discount. They very frequently resell defective items, and blatantly upgrade the condition a step or two...

      Ever been to Fry's or Micro Center? I got an ISA SCSI card instead of a PCI one, once. Similar issues abound in meatspace.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You made the point I was trying to make much better than I did

    26. Re:So, Amazon was counting on only a few customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost me with your trite phrase "hard-earned money". You're nothing but a fucking marketer, or at least one who absorbs their propaganda without a second thought.

  5. Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Newegg has a price matching policy, but they make no mention of matching their own prices.... Although they tell you to report any lower price within 3 weeks they will summarily ignore your email if the price you attempt to match is from newegg itself. That site has gone way downhill over the years.

    1. Re:Newegg does the same thing by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Why are you contracting them by email? You want a better response, start a chat window to have a conversation with a human being.

    2. Re:Newegg does the same thing by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Informative

      I haven't used Newegg in years. Their return policy is terrible.

      If I get a defective product from Amazon, they send me a new one before asking for the return. Newegg wanted their product first, charge me return fees since it's not their fault it's defective, and charged me shipping for the replacement.

      Only had to have that happen a few times to say to hell with them. Plus, their prices are not very competitive anymore.

    3. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Newegg has a price matching policy, but they make no mention of matching their own prices.... Although they tell you to report any lower price within 3 weeks they will summarily ignore your email if the price you attempt to match is from newegg itself. That site has gone way downhill over the years.

      Newegg.com sure has gotten to be a seedy site - like the dilapidated, half-abandoned strip mall across from the prison, where you go when you life's a dumpster fire and you need to find a pawn shop/payday loan shark/bail bondsman while thinking it'd be better to be robbed and killed.

      All Newegg's third-party sellers need to be chased away with DDT.

      I feel more comfortable buying stuff off eBay.

    4. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you think there's a real person at the other end of the chat? That's so precious.

    5. Re:Newegg does the same thing by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If it was a computer, it wouldn't be pausing to find the appropriate script and making stupid mistakes.

    6. Re:Newegg does the same thing by twotacocombo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I haven't used Newegg in years. Their return policy is terrible.

      Amen. I bought a board from them a few years back. Got the PC all built and running, but something was causing lock ups. Turns out several individual pins were bent in the CPU socket. There's no way I'm good enough to just bend a single pin in several different places, so it had to have come like that. I didn't want to wait a week+ without a PC while I shipped it back and they shipped me another one, so I purchased the same one overnight from Amazon and had it up and running the next day. Newegg's return policy for mobos is "No". Just "No". Even if they shipped it to you in three pieces, you cannot return for a refund under any circumstance. It took several days for them to at least agree to give me store credit. After spending thousands with them over the years, I found this to be an exceptionally poor way to handle a $150 purchase. I haven't been back to their site since, and I spend every opportunity I can advising people not to shop with them.

    7. Re:Newegg does the same thing by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      If I get a defective product from Amazon, they send me a new one before asking for the return.

      Well, they used to at least. Last week I received a defective SD card reader. Amazon didn't even offer a replacement - they merely emailed the shipping label and told me my card would be credited when they received the item. That I have Prime and have been a customer for more than 15 years makes this response not very encouraging, especially in conjunction with the increasing number of items that don't get two-day shipping.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    8. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Nethead · · Score: 3, Funny

      It took several days for them to at least agree to give me store credit... I found this to be an exceptionally poor way to handle a $150 purchase. I haven't been back to their site since..

      So can I have your store credit?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    9. Re:Newegg does the same thing by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Since your comment is the most visible of this thread, I'll hang this here. I'm not affiliated with these guys and I don't make a dime from them but for computer parts, I've found superbiiz.com to be a good replacement for Newegg. Haven't had a problem yet and their prices are often lower.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    10. Re:Newegg does the same thing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      You should lobby for better consumer protection laws, rather than relying on retailers being good to you.

      In the UK you get two weeks to return the item for any reason (including that the price dropped). Beyond that, you have strong protections if it is faulty, such as not having to pay return shipping.

      Make it the law.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Newegg does the same thing by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Once I bought an "OEM" cpu, and it came in a box about 12"x6"x2", pretty huge for a single CPU (no fan, just the CPU). Whomever packed it put a few pieces of brown paper "stuffing" in it, enough to fill it up about 1/4. In shipping the plastic holder had come open, the chip had come out, and at least 1/2 of the pins had gotten bent over. But since this was about ten years ago, I got them to cross-ship me a replacement. Honestly, though, nothing I've bought from them recently has had any issues.

    12. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK you get two weeks to return the item for any reason (including that the price dropped). Beyond that, you have strong protections if it is faulty, such as not having to pay return shipping.

      Make it the law.

      In the U.S., law is made by the elected representatives of the people, who are then bought and corrupted by the corporations and do what their new corporate masters command.

      Certainly the jerks at the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes. Even money on whether the CEOs or the Congresscum will be up second, or third.

    13. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Newegg's return policy for mobos is "No". Just "No".

      Here's a randomly selected motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128859

      "GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3 R5"

      "Return Policies
      Return for refund within: 30 days
      Return for replacement within: 30 days
      This item is covered by Newegg.com's Standard Return Policy."

      Here is Newegg's Standard Return Policy: http://kb.newegg.com/Policies/Article/1167#44 and their rules regarding restocking fees: http://kb.newegg.com/FAQ/Article/1755

      (The money quote on restocking fees: "Newegg does NOT charge restocking fees for returns of defective products. If you have received the wrong product or it doesn't match what was shown on our site or we have made some other shipping error, there will be NO restocking fee and NO charge for a return label, provided the item is within its return policy period.")

      > Even if they shipped it to you in three pieces, you cannot return for a refund under any circumstance.

      That is damage from shipping and is eligible for return for replacement. Read http://kb.newegg.com/Policies/Article/1167#overall and http://kb.newegg.com/FAQ/Article/1403 (starting at "FULL INSTRUCTIONS").

      If your replacement item is undamaged and is not to your liking, it is covered by the original item's return policy. In the case of nearly every new motherboard, you can return for refund or replacement within 30 days.

      I have had to return a few items to Newegg for replacement or refund over the years. The process has been universally quick and hassle-free.

      Newegg may not have the lowest price for every item in their inventory, but they -unlike many Internet retailers (including Amazon)- absolutely will not settle with patent trolls under any circumstance. I'm willing to pay a bit more to help fund a company that refuses to feed the trolls.

    14. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      You should lobby for better consumer protection laws, rather than relying on retailers being good to you.

      In the UK you get two weeks to return the item for any reason (including that the price dropped). Beyond that, you have strong protections if it is faulty, such as not having to pay return shipping.

      Make it the law.

      While such a law is appealing it ads to the initial,purchase price as manufacturers and retailers need to factor those costs into the price.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    15. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Return policy? Their shipping policy is terrible. I have free 3 day shipping... once the order is processes... in two to three days.

    16. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They give you the grounds to recover 100% of your losses in small claims court. Small claims court is inexpensive and you can file for damages that include the cost to make the claim. So, no. Company policies are not worthless.

    17. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several glaring factual errors in twotacocombo's statements that don't stand up to even trivial fact-checking.

      We should keep in mind that there are people who make a living by shaping conversation in the public sphere in the direction that their paymasters wish it to be shaped. Astroturfing isn't new.

    18. Re:Newegg does the same thing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I haven't used Newegg in years. Their return policy is terrible.

      Also their prices are garbage now, on most items anyway. Maybe 1% of the time they have a good price.

      If I get a defective product from Amazon, they send me a new one before asking for the return.

      We have Prime and they still don't do this. The return has to get there before they will send me anything.

      Actually, my best experience was with Computer Geeks, AKA geeks.com. When I have a problem with something I've bought there, which doesn't happen too often any more because their prices aren't that great either as a rule, they make it right faster than anyone. A super-cheap case I bought from them experienced power supply failure, a 450W. They sent me a 480W that was worth more than the whole case...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though they had an annoying return policy I did use them for a while since back at the time (around 2007-2008?) they had lower prices for some items. They had stopped cool things like free t-shirts with your order and were not as competitive as in previous years, but I still got a few items. Until they stopped sending to my office. I tried adding it as a secondary to my credit card, no go, it would be declined as address does not match CC, I tried their customer service they couldn't help, suggested I change my CC billing address to the office (yeah, right) and, I gave up. They had managed to bring online-retail back 10 years.... No idea how they've been doing since then.

    20. Re:Newegg does the same thing by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why people haven't figured out that businesses adapt their model whenever government tries to force something on them. Government regs usually end up hurting employees and consumers. (Obama Care - reduce everyone to under 30 hours. Raise minimum wage - see an increase in automation at restaurants. For employers to pay salary overtime - promote less people to manager and hire a few more under 30 hour employees.)

      Business exists to sustain themselves and the larger ones are able to work around any regulation that comes along. The smaller ones die or get absorbed by the larger one (just look at the insurance companies and banks for examples.)

    21. Re:Newegg does the same thing by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I bought a moto 360 watch about a few months ago and they shipped me a new one at no charge. I eventually got a charge because I never gotten around to shipping it back (even though they had given me a paid shipping label.) As soon as I saw the charge, I remembered I never returned it and sent it back. I was credited back the charge without any interaction needed on my part.

    22. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't any excuse to just give up on regulating the market.

    23. Re:Newegg does the same thing by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Any suggestions for a good Newegg replacement?

      I've used Newegg on and off since 2006 to buy parts for my machines but I haven't upgraded any of them recently beyond a GPU in late 2014. Always enjoyed the experience but I wasn't a fan of their becoming another Frys.

    24. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Business exists to sustain themselves

      There's a missing piece that seems to regularly be skipped out by Libertarian/Conservative /.ers - businesses exist by the grace and will of society. They are just ONE piece of the capitalist economic engine and just like engines in real life, if one part of the engine starts going bad, the whole engine starts to break down. We don't have to be a capitalist society, it wasn't written into the constitution and it's not a "right" that people "make the most amount of money possible".

    25. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      In the U.S., law is made by the elected representatives of the people, who are then bought and corrupted by the corporations and do what their new corporate masters command.

      Exactly. And what's worse, the People are so dumb they're happy to vote for a candidate who's obviously sold out to Goldman Sachs and various other corporate masters.

    26. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I feel more comfortable buying stuff off eBay.

      I buy a fair amount of stuff from Ebay still, and honestly I have really good experiences with it mostly. The secret is to not blindly buy from just any seller, but instead to look carefully at the seller's record and feedbacks. When I see a seller with a score of 500, they've been on there for more than a decade, and their feedback score is 100% (not a single negative), that's someone I feel safe buying from. When you see some guy with a new account and little or no feedbacks (and none as a seller), assume the worst. If you're buying something from China, be prepared for it to not show up or to be crappy, but you might get a really good deal too, so don't buy anything expensive from there but for small, cheap stuff it's a good alternative.

    27. Re:Newegg does the same thing by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      > Business exists to sustain themselves

      There's a missing piece that seems to regularly be skipped out by Libertarian/Conservative /.ers - businesses exist by the grace and will of society.

      Don't we all?

    28. Re:Newegg does the same thing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      While such a law is appealing it ads to the initial,purchase price as manufacturers and retailers need to factor those costs into the price.

      Not the case. For most of the products an existing manufacturer warranty applies anyway. The problem with that is the manufacturer may have no or little presence in the country in which you currently live. Case in point I had to return a camera lens I bought in the USA after I moved overseas. The store wanted nothing to do with me so I eventually managed to get it FedEx'd to the company in Japan and they sent me a new one.

      In countries like Australia the only thing that changes is that the point of sale is responsible for the base warranty. This does not affect cost of returns at all since the mandated minimum warranty is often shorter than what many companies offer anyway. What it does do is move the burden of logistics onto people who can handle the logistics. The cost of a store handling thousands of products, from hundreds of vendors, with existing distribution channels and agreements in place; returning a product dwarfs the cost of a consumer attempting to do the same thing. Bonus points that they normally have one on the shelf and can do an on the spot swap eliminating the "cost" of lost time.

    29. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      While such a law is appealing it ads to the initial,purchase price as manufacturers and retailers need to factor those costs into the price.

      Not the case. For most of the products an existing manufacturer warranty applies anyway.

      In some cases local laws mandate a longer warranty period which adds to the warranty costs and thus prices are raised.

      The problem with that is the manufacturer may have no or little presence in the country in which you currently live. Case in point I had to return a camera lens I bought in the USA after I moved overseas. The store wanted nothing to do with me so I eventually managed to get it FedEx'd to the company in Japan and they sent me a new one.

      That makes sense because the company you bought it from in the US may be a separate subsidiary from the one overseas and thus the overseas one is not liable for the warranty and doesn't want to absorb warranty costs for an item they did not sell. Not all companies do that, some offer world wide warranties.

      In countries like Australia the only thing that changes is that the point of sale is responsible for the base warranty. This does not affect cost of returns at all since the mandated minimum warranty is often shorter than what many companies offer anyway. What it does do is move the burden of logistics onto people who can handle the logistics. The cost of a store handling thousands of products, from hundreds of vendors, with existing distribution channels and agreements in place; returning a product dwarfs the cost of a consumer attempting to do the same thing. Bonus points that they normally have one on the shelf and can do an on the spot swap eliminating the "cost" of lost time.

      All of which are costs factored int the price, and if the consumer has more rights in B than in A, items generally cost more in B to compensate for the extra costs. As for the store, a swap ,means one less item to sell which also has a cost of a potential lost sale. TNSTAAFL

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    30. Re:Newegg does the same thing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In some cases local laws mandate a longer warranty period which adds to the warranty costs and thus prices are raised.

      Agreed, but in most countries where this has happened the legally mandated warranty is minimal and quite frankly when it comes to electronics pretty much all companies offer something close to or exceeding this anyway unless they are also in the "value adding" business of selling you insurance on top of their shit products.

      That makes sense because the company you bought it from in the US may be a separate subsidiary from the one overseas and thus the overseas one is not liable for the warranty and doesn't want to absorb warranty costs for an item they did not sell. Not all companies do that, some offer world wide warranties.

      No it was a supply chain issue. There was always a world-wide warranty on the lens but the process is the same as it is with most companies; the device needs to come back through the local distribution chain. A chain which is built on solid relationships between vendor - distributor - seller - customer, which completely breaks down when the customer needs to talk to someone else.

      All of which are costs factored int the price, and if the consumer has more rights in B than in A, items generally cost more in B to compensate for the extra costs. As for the store, a swap ,means one less item to sell which also has a cost of a potential lost sale. TNSTAAFL

      Agreed, all the costs are factored in, including the cost of inefficiency. That's ultimately what has changed by a lot of these regulations. It just moves the process back into the most efficient path, and the additional cost is offset by the increased efficiency of having an existing contractual relationship, something which a customer does not have with a distributor or vendor.

      Simple example:
      - RMAing a Seagate HDD in the USA involved a call to the distribution centre, filing out paperwork, having the drive delivered to the distribution centre, paying a service fee, being without the drive for 6 weeks, and then having it delivered back.
      - RMAing a Seagate HDD in Australia involved going to the store I got it from with receipt in hand and having it exchanged. The store then went through the same process, except back when I worked at the store instead of manually moving things around and paying a service charge, and filling out paperwork we would: Scan the barcode on the drive and throw it in a pile. At the end of the month run an RMA report with a click of a button. Return RMA equipment in bulk, regardless if it was a customer returned or defect on arrival or damaged during shipping, and the service cost to the distributor was the same as was the shipping costs regardless if we had customer defects or not.

      There's no such thing as a free lunch. But we don't need to make that sandwich in the most expensive and labour intensive way either.

    31. Re:Newegg does the same thing by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      In some cases local laws mandate a longer warranty period which adds to the warranty costs and thus prices are raised.

      Agreed, but in most countries where this has happened the legally mandated warranty is minimal and quite frankly when it comes to electronics pretty much all companies offer something close to or exceeding this anyway unless they are also in the "value adding" business of selling you insurance on top of their shit products.

      It really depends own location; in general that is true. The EU has a longer mandated warranty period for some items and thus they pay more to cover those added costs.

      That makes sense because the company you bought it from in the US may be a separate subsidiary from the one overseas and thus the overseas one is not liable for the warranty and doesn't want to absorb warranty costs for an item they did not sell. Not all companies do that, some offer world wide warranties.

      No it was a supply chain issue. There was always a world-wide warranty on the lens but the process is the same as it is with most companies; the device needs to come back through the local distribution chain. A chain which is built on solid relationships between vendor - distributor - seller - customer, which completely breaks down when the customer needs to talk to someone else.

      I really wouldn't consider that to be a world wide warranty if you have to return it to the region purchase for warranty work; to me a worldwide warranty is one where you can get warranty service anywhere there is a repair facility regardless of where you purchased the item. Apple does that for example.

      All of which are costs factored int the price, and if the consumer has more rights in B than in A, items generally cost more in B to compensate for the extra costs. As for the store, a swap ,means one less item to sell which also has a cost of a potential lost sale. TNSTAAFL

      Agreed, all the costs are factored in, including the cost of inefficiency. That's ultimately what has changed by a lot of these regulations. It just moves the process back into the most efficient path, and the additional cost is offset by the increased efficiency of having an existing contractual relationship, something which a customer does not have with a distributor or vendor.

      Simple example: - RMAing a Seagate HDD in the USA involved a call to the distribution centre, filing out paperwork, having the drive delivered to the distribution centre, paying a service fee, being without the drive for 6 weeks, and then having it delivered back. - RMAing a Seagate HDD in Australia involved going to the store I got it from with receipt in hand and having it exchanged. The store then went through the same process, except back when I worked at the store instead of manually moving things around and paying a service charge, and filling out paperwork we would: Scan the barcode on the drive and throw it in a pile. At the end of the month run an RMA report with a click of a button. Return RMA equipment in bulk, regardless if it was a customer returned or defect on arrival or damaged during shipping, and the service cost to the distributor was the same as was the shipping costs regardless if we had customer defects or not.

      There's no such thing as a free lunch. But we don't need to make that sandwich in the most expensive and labour intensive way either.

      It may be more efficient for the buyer but not for the seller. In your first case Seagate has no added cost beyond answering a phone call and receiving and repairing the item. In the second case both the store and manufacturer have the added costs of handling the item in their supply chain from receipt of item from customer at store until on the receiving dock at the repair center. The cost different may be negligible but depending on the quantities can get expensive; however I really doubt ei

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  6. No thanks, Earny by NotDrWho · · Score: 0

    Earny scours a customer's email inbox for digital receipts, and then continuously checks the price on a retailer's website to see if it drops.

    My privacy is already eroded enough without handing some random app access to all my emails.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:No thanks, Earny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trolling about SJW and gamer gate and whatever else. Nobody cares about that except for neckbearded misogynists getting butthurt about video games.

    2. Re:No thanks, Earny by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      That's some low quality bait

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    3. Re:No thanks, Earny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, nice try, but Socjusty only works on emails, Slashdot replies are currently not scanned. If you email the above comment to NotDrWho though he'll get the required electric shock.

    4. Re:No thanks, Earny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL Thunderfoot makes your point in this video much better than you do.

  7. Do consumer pre-orders influence supply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If yes, bummer. Pre-orders will drop, supplies will drop, prices will go up, and ... I see what you did there, Amazon.

  8. End half of all refunds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every week drop all prices 1 cent. And raise them up again next week.

    Scummy... amazon!

  9. So In Other Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Amazon used to until people abused it. But they will probably still do it within a small time frame though for good customer service. otherwise all that's going to happen is people will return and rebuy the item at the lower price and Amazon will be out shipping.

    1. Re:So In Other Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon has also begun closing accounts of people who "abuse" the return policy, in Amazon's opinion, and that is a harsh punishment: Not only will they close your account, and any account they consider related, they will also close any new account you create after that. In addition to no longer being able to order from Amazon and through Amazon, this excludes you from using Kindle eBook readers with their store, from Amazon Prime Music and Video, from the Amazon app store, and from using the Amazon Payments system.

    2. Re:So In Other Words... by TroII · · Score: 2

      Amazon has also begun closing accounts of people who "abuse" the return policy, in Amazon's opinion

      Meanwhile, they encourage you to subscribe to Prime and use it to buy items like clothing and shoes, which you obviously can't try on until they've been delivered. But heaven forbid stuff doesn't fit and you want to return it, now you're "abusing" the system and your account is terminated; by the way, thanks for all the Prime payments! Nice racket they have going.

    3. Re:So In Other Words... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why would you buy that kind of stuff through anyone who doesn't make their return policy a major part of their plan, e.g. Zappos? I will buy shoes from Zappos even though they do not have the best prices because if I don't want them, I don't have to keep them. Oddly enough, Zappos has been owned by Amazon for some years now...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. I have noticed this as well... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I buy a TON of things from Amazon, I'm a heavy Prime customer...

    That being said, my last three price adjustment requests in the past two weeks have all been denied, which is very odd.

    I do it manually, just when I notice things... I buy at least a half a dozen items a week from Amazon.

    This change will make me think twice before buying as much.

    1. Re:I have noticed this as well... by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That being said, my last three price adjustment requests in the past two weeks have all been denied, which is very odd.

      Same. Only time I ever tried it was for a TV -- you know, an item where it would actually be worth getting the difference back -- and they denied it. Said there was no evidence it was retailing for the other price I mentioned, or somesuch (although my receipt might tend to indicate otherwise). I read some reviews and a lot of people apparently had the same experience. The refunds were fulfilled by some third party vendor who was apparently pretty shady (kind of like that godawful OnTrak shipping company that seems to be keeping itself afloat by tossing as many Amazon packages from still-moving vehicles as possible).

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:I have noticed this as well... by jittles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I buy a TON of things from Amazon, I'm a heavy Prime customer...

      That being said, my last three price adjustment requests in the past two weeks have all been denied, which is very odd.

      I do it manually, just when I notice things... I buy at least a half a dozen items a week from Amazon.

      This change will make me think twice before buying as much.

      You're doing this manually but noticed three price adjustments in a two week period? Are you unemployed? I buy something on Amazon because I don't have the time to go to the store and pick it up. The last thing I am going to do is keep my eye out for price adjustments. If it's something like a TV that will deflate in value over the next year then I just watch the price myself until it's time to pull the trigger - or better yet - use a website to watch the price for me. If I needed it so badly that I couldn't wait for a price I was happy with, well what's a few dollars, then?

    3. Re:I have noticed this as well... by Your.Master · · Score: 0

      I buy it on Amazon because, even though I do have time to go to the store and pick it up, why would I do that when I could just buy it on Amazon?

      I do agree with you that I'm not likely to price-watch the small stuff -- that's not new to Amazon though. A price adjustment on a big-ticket item has never come up for me.

    4. Re:I have noticed this as well... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      You're doing this manually but noticed three price adjustments in a two week period? Are you unemployed?

      No, I simply do a lot of shopping there and keep an eye on my past purchases.

      About once a week, I take a look at anything over $50 or so that I've bought in the past month and click on it to see the current price.

      Amazon changes prices so often, it isn't hard to catch.

      I've gotten a lot of money back over the years this way.

    5. Re:I have noticed this as well... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 0

      I buy something on Amazon because I don't have the time to go to the store and pick it up.

      I buy stuff on Amazon because going to the store takes time and costs money, I buy very little at stores anymore.

    6. Re:I have noticed this as well... by evilviper · · Score: 2

      You're doing this manually but noticed three price adjustments in a two week period? Are you unemployed? I buy something on Amazon because I don't have the time to go to the store and pick it up. The last thing I am going to do is keep my eye out for price adjustments.

      Some items you only buy one in a great while, and then proceed to forget about them. Other items are consumable and you need to resupply on a fairly regular basis, so checking on the price every week or so is a good way to stock-up when the item is cheaper, and the routine isn't all that time consuming.

      In addition, Amazon has a healthy review and discussion system, so a decent number of users go back to write-up their thoughts, or look through the reviews, comments, and product questions of others. In the process, anyone would of course notice the prominently noted current price...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:I have noticed this as well... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      I buy a TON of things from Amazon, I'm a heavy Prime customer...

      That being said, my last three price adjustment requests in the past two weeks have all been denied, which is very odd.

      I do it manually, just when I notice things... I buy at least a half a dozen items a week from Amazon.

      This change will make me think twice before buying as much.

      You're doing this manually but noticed three price adjustments in a two week period? Are you unemployed? I buy something on Amazon because I don't have the time to go to the store and pick it up. The last thing I am going to do is keep my eye out for price adjustments. If it's something like a TV that will deflate in value over the next year then I just watch the price myself until it's time to pull the trigger - or better yet - use a website to watch the price for me. If I needed it so badly that I couldn't wait for a price I was happy with, well what's a few dollars, then?

      You do not need to be unemployed (or say, doing nothing) to keep tabs on things. Like with all abilities, some people are better than others.

  11. So what? Many credit cards do this already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I buy something with my credit card, the warranty is doubled, it is insured against loss for 90 days, and I get price matching for 60 days (from any retailer).

    Admittedly there are some exceptions, but it's great. Many other credit cards offer similar perks.

    1. Re:So what? Many credit cards do this already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What credit card doubles a warranty?

  12. Pissing off the customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that price volatility with the almost guaranteed feeling of "losing out" when the price drops after the purchase is just going to piss off the customers. Same with the "targeted" pricing: Even if you never pay a higher price while browsing from an iPhone, once you've heard about it, you'll always suspect that you got ripped off. Big retailers think they're playing us like a fiddle, but they really screw themselves by ruining our willingness to pay a price that we perceive as fair.

  13. Re:Newegg-bad return policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup,

    I have used the Egg for at least 10 years. Their return policy sucks...I had a Seasonic power supply go bad (third one in 2 years- talk about a brand gone down hill) and I bought a new one on the Egg.

    But the new one was DOA (yup, it was another SeaSonic). I had to pay return shipping on a defective product. I don't mind paying return shipping if I change my mind or I bought the wrong item. But if it is defective?

    So I ordered a Roswill to replace it and all is well.

  14. you can always return the product and repurchase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at the lower price. It only makes sense for the merchant to just adjust the price and refund the difference. It makes things easier for everyone. If a merchant refuse to do that, the customer can just return the product and repurchase adding cost to the merchant. Merchants who cannot see that just adding more problems to themselves and alienate the customers at the same time. Unless they also change their refund and return policy.

  15. Amazon no longer a price leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For years I have used Amazon to do price checks to see what I should pay. Last week I need a can opener and checked Amazon and found Walmart about 10% cheaper on the model of interest. Curious, I then checked an old-line big box retailer (unnamed so this isn't a shrill for them), it was 20% cheaper than Walmart. Yup, same item, same model number.

    For several years Fry's has had by far the best CPU prices, but you can bet I'll still check before buying my next CPU.

    1. Re:Amazon no longer a price leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last can opener I bought from Amazon had a 5 star rating but lasted less than 2 weeks. It also came with 3 spam emails per week from the seller. My 1 star review said "Great for opening cans of (email) spam but broke on everything else"

    2. Re:Amazon no longer a price leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never heard of people who take the purchase of can openers so seriously. But maybe that's because I got lucky with mine, purchased in Switzerland when I vacationed there about 12 years ago. I hope it lasts forever. So far, so good.

    3. Re:Amazon no longer a price leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I moved out of my parents' house many years ago, for reasons I never quite understood my mother offered me their can opener. I guess because she wanted a fancy new one. I am still using the can opener that she gave me, while they have gone through a series of them that have stopped working or never worked right. If you have a good can opener, stick with it.

    4. Re:Amazon no longer a price leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least when you're on your death bed you'll be able to argue that you never got ripped off buying a can opener. Interesting however that you let some invisible company tell you what you should do.

      While you're out looking for advice on can openers, here some other 'internet' advice. Man up and start making your own decisions.

  16. Re:you can always return the product and repurchas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an example of a few bad apples (people trying to make a business of refunds) ruining everything. It's in a retailer's interest to just refund the difference, but only as long as a small % of people actually do. They know few people will want/care enough/find it financially sound to do a return+repurchase, but the number of people who might participate in something like the mentioned services is substantial.

  17. Re: So, Amazon was counting on only a few customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You mean a large number of robots. Once again, assholes ruin it for everyone else.

  18. Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, this is so much easier to deal with Best Buy these days. They price match Amazon (although not the 4rd part resellers) and other retailers, and will price match themselves during the return period. As a member, I also get a 45 return period on nearly everything, plus free 2 day shipping for online orders. Last year, I even got them to price match a TV I purchased in October with the Thanksgiving weekend sale price, saving me about $600.

    1. Re:Best Buy by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      ...until Earny-BestBuy starts tracking them, automatically requesting thousands of refunds every day, and then gets Best Buy to change their policies as well.

  19. FORMER Santa Monica-based startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff said.

    Tim

  20. Re: So, Amazon was counting on only a few customer by JonBoy47 · · Score: 1

    Amazon's pricing isn't that sophisticated. They do yo-yo prices on a very regular basis, often-times in concert with changing which 3rd party vendor is sells no the item.

  21. Sucked in Earny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who snakes through a dishonest and easily closed loophole deserves to be decapitated when it closes. To Earny's startup hipsters: HA HA!

  22. Earny (and others) are the problem. by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    Earny, by automating it (and siphoning off a percentage), spoiled it for the rest of us.

    This is why we can't have nice things.

  23. They abandoned this practice over 5 years ago by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    I remember emailing them over 5 years ago trying to get a price match after they dropped the price on an item a few days after I ordered it. They said they no longer had a price matching policy.

    1. Re:They abandoned this practice over 5 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! I had thought I was in a time warp to 2011 or something. How the hell were people still even getting price reduction credits from Amazon at all these days? Back then it very clearly went from "ok no problem" to "no, we don't do that anymore but if you're a good customer and whine loudly enough we'll make a one time exception for you, just this once." It was a fairly major change and prompted lots of heated complaints pretty much everywhere; probably including here but I won't bother to go searching back to try to verify.

  24. Use an extension by nikkipolya · · Score: 1

    That's why I use extensions like keepa, that show the price history of a product on amazon and also lets me set target price alerts. Its like stock trading.

  25. It is all about the price-calculating algorithm by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    Amazon has said (when they were trying to get publishers to agree to lower/variable prices) that their prices are set to generate maximum income, i.e. max profit x volume. You lower the price if you feel more people will buy it to justify the lower price, and Amazon apparently has great algorithms to do that. Now, if people can retroactively get the difference it is still doable if they are just a few so that you can ignore them and "eat" the difference. If many people started to do this with automated services, then it either becomes pretty much impossible to calculate the optimal price-drops, and/or you result in smaller price-drops to account for the refunds, meaning you end up with a smaller volume as well (due to the less desirable price), so overall it starts hurting Amazon sales.
    I've been a heavy Prime user for many years (first in the US, now in the UK) and apart from the refunds, Amazon has been really great with me in numerous occasions (when the manufacturer was unhelpful, long after Amazon's return window), so I won't mind these refunds going away.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  26. AI Killer App? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    While using apps to compare prices on groceries while shopping, it occurred to me that it would seem to be the sort of task an AI would be good at. Right now Siri tries to take you to iTunes when you ask about music, and I imagine Alexa offers to let you order all kinds of things from Amazon, but an AI not tethered to a vendor would be much more useful. It would be extremely disruptive to retailers and advertising would be extremely difficult. Imagine dictating a shopping list to an AI that could compare price per unit, have a whitelist of brand names that you consider interchangeable, and would be able to target 'free shipping' price minimums.

    1. Re:AI Killer App? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of an app that compares prices on groceries, how about an app that evaluates based on some other significant factor such as quality of working conditions of their employees or contributions to the community etc.

      Everyone's obsession with price is just putting this country in the trash can and is going to get Trump elected.

    2. Re:AI Killer App? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      True, selectable filters would be ideal... you could even shoot for better materials or durability.

  27. Re:Only in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this with Newegg a few days ago. Needed to buy 20TB of storage, I could get 3x4TB drives for a combo price, but i need 5. They would only honor the combo price in packs of 3, ordered it + the other 2 I needed. The NEXT day, promo code good for up to 5 drives for $20 off the (already discounted) price which put it about $5/drive less than the combo price. After about 45 minutes and me threatening to return for refund and just order the drives at the discounted rate, they decided to honor the price change. Oddly enough, if they would've just given me the combo price, I wouldn't have said a word about the promo code, but that made it a ~$40 discount over what I paid, and it was free shipping so I wouldn't have been out anything but time.

  28. Re:Only in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bro, newegg sold out years ago! I don't know why people are still surprised by this kind of stuff.

  29. Use Credit Card by pwthoma · · Score: 1

    That's fine. Just do a price match via your credit card. Most of them offer this service for free.

    --
    Eat more bacon!
  30. Because repricers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon is beta testing an auto repricer in their back end that all Amazon sellers will have access to. This will mean even more price fluctuations, both up and down, but usually down. They stand to lose a lot of everyone want a refund.