Slashdot Mirror


Apple Sued Over iPhones Making Calls, Sending Email (fortune.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fortune: A company that seemingly does nothing but license patents or, if necessary, sue other companies to get royalties, has taken aim at Apple. But here's the kicker: the lawsuit alleges that Apple's last several iPhones and iPads violate a slew of patents related to seemingly standard features, including the ability to place calls as well as sending and receiving emails. A total of six patent infringement claims were brought against Apple by Corydoras Technologies on May 20, according to Apple-tracking site Patently Apple, which obtained a copy of the lawsuit. According to Patently Apple, the counts against Apple cover every iPhone dating back to the iPhone 4 and every iPad dating back to the iPad 2. In addition to taking issue with Apple's devices placing calls, the lawsuits also allege that the tech giant violates patents Corydoras holds related to video calling, which is similar to Apple's FaceTime, as well as displaying a person's geographic location through a feature like Find My iPhone and the ability to block unwanted calls. Last year, Apple was ordered to pay $533 million to Smartflash LLC for allegedly violating three patents related to copy protection.

11 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. wait, wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    an iphone can make calls? no fucking way! i don't think i've ever seen my sister or her kid make a call on theirs.

    1. Re:wait, wut? by saloomy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know, this is stupid. Making calls? Making video calls? Ever see 2001: A space odyssey? Im sure there are older examples of video calling. Isn't that prior art? What the fuck?

      These patents needs to be invalidated, patents should last for a decade at the most. If you can't make money on the idea in a decade, and gain enough marketshare to fund further R&D, get out of capitalism.
      But seriously, why are these trivial patents getting through our system with so much prior art and established methods already common knowledge. No Corydoras Technologies, you did not invent the video phone, nor did you tell Apple how its done. /rant

    2. Re:wait, wut? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's common sense presumably. Except that the judges and juries in East Texas haven't seen that movie yet.

      Whew. That was close. You used the phrase "common sense" and the word Texas in two different sentences.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:wait, wut? by crgrace · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Warp Drive" as a concept should not be patentable. If it were, then someone could claim a patent on all faster-than-light travel.

      What *is* patentable is a specific implementation of the warp drive concept. Someone else could build a warp drive in a different way, but they couldn't copy your design.

      That's the main idea behind patents, although it is partially corrupted now.

  2. Good by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The more stupid patent lawsuits we have, the more likely we will see patent reform.

    Right now, none of the big guys want patent reform, because it helps them keep down competitors, and some of them make a good chunk of money from it. If we want to see patent reform, then they're going to have to start hurting. Bring on the patent trolls, I say!

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Good by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The more stupid lawsuits we have, the more stupid lawsuits we'll have. Why would the lawyers stop the gravy train just when it's getting going?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  3. Expo 67 - Canada - Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In 1967 one of the ways Canada celebrated its centenary was to hold an exposition called Expo 67. I can remember being there as a kid and being entranced by something that looked like it was from the future. It had a keyboard, a telephone handset and a ~10" black and white screen. You could talk to and see the person on the other side of the hall who was sitting at a similar device. According to Bell Canada it was coming "real soon now".

    1. Re:Expo 67 - Canada - Eh by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only thing from Bell Canada that's "coming real soon now" is your next invoice.

  4. Re:I don't know how it would work.... by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember though that in the past you had to actually show a model of your invention, and have a patent inspector pass on it. Meaning that you had done some non-trivial amount of work first, you had the idea and also the means to demonstrate the idea, and now needed time to get manufacturing up and running. Today the patent inspectors just rubber stamp everything, no one needs a working model, or even a non-working model. That's what's broken.

    The limited time for exclusive access was very useful in the past. That is, if you think that supporting the little guy versus the large conglomerate is useful for society. The actual purpose of patents originally was not to lock everything out from everyone else, instead the purpose was to make the patent free and open once the time period expired. Before patents inventions were kept locked up and controlled, guilds were formed to protect the secrets, and so forth.

    The patent term was long enough to get up and running and get into a competitive position before the rest of the world started making copies (but long enough to be more lucrative than hoarding the invention). Twenty years was also a very short period in the past, it just seems extremely long today because people are rushing new crap out as fast as they can and planned obsolescence is the status quo.

  5. Like the Old Saying Goes . . . by Kunedog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Patent trolling is the motherfucker of invention.

  6. Bottom Feeders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else notice the company is NAMED for a species of bottom-feeding catfish?