Slashdot Mirror


Apple To Launch Thinner, Lighter MacBook Pro Models With OLED Touch Bar, Touch ID In Fall (9to5mac.com)

Apple plans to refresh its MacBook Pro line later this year. The makeover will see both 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pro models replace their function keys atop laptop keyboards with an OLED touch bar, according to a report. Both the models will also have Touch ID fingerprint sensor, and will support Thunderbolt 3 USB-C port, multiple outlets are reporting citing ever-so-reliable KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. The refreshed MacBook Pro model will be thinner and lighter as well. There's no word on if -- and when -- the MacBook Air lineup will receive a refresh.

38 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Thinner and lighter... by The-Ixian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is still the main marketing touch point?

    I am starting to believe all the "Apple is starting to stagnate" hype...

    Apple, I think it's time to reformulate the sales pitch...

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Thinner and lighter... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Apple really is stagnating. Watch the 2014 Keynote when they introduce the "new" Mac mini. The hype and bullet points are misleading.

      They wrote "PCIe-based flash storage" as if that was the default setup but they're still putting slow 5400 RPM in their computers, the flash storage is optional in all models. I would have been happier to see even only 120GB flash storage in the low-end rather than a slow 5400 RPM hard drive.

      The fact that the low-end model is only 1.4GHz and that RAM is soldered on-board means that you absolutely need to buy a more expensive model right out of the gate, making the mini more expensive than it really needs to be. I was able to go from 4GB, then 8GB and now 16GB in my 2010 mini and I also removed the optical drive to add a 7200 RPM WD Black in the second bay. The only thing I'm not able to update is the old Core 2 Duo CPU. All those extra expenses were done over the course of 6 years, I would never have been able to pay the total price in 2010.

    2. Re:Thinner and lighter... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2

      The whole laptop market is 'stagnating' in the sense that most of current laptop users don't really need traditional laptops at all. No incremental features or hardware bumps are going to make most laptop users go out and buy a new one - when all most of them need is a Chromebook. Companies tied to Windows, will keep buying replacement laptops for a while, I suppose. And those who are not tied to Windows might buy Macbook Airs as party favors for their 'high-status' employees - but for the most part, if a company has weaned itself from Windows dependency to the extent that it's users can get by with a Mac, they're well on their way to being able to hand out Chromebooks to everyone as party favors. That can run Android apps too... or RDP... or Citrix.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    3. Re:Thinner and lighter... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      As a MacBook Pro users all I can say is NO NO NO.
      Make MacBook Pro with at least one M.2 slot and user upgradeable ram!
      The price of ram and SSDs keep dropping! It is insane to lot let you upgrade them after purchase on a "professional" machine.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  2. Apple is copying...Lenovo? by blackomegax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lenovo tried getting rid of F-keys with a touch bar in the X1. It failed SPECTACULARLY. I suspect the same will happen to Apple here. Professionals use F-keys. A lot. and not being able to touch type them is a glorious, horrible, pain in the ASS.

    1. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      I very rarely use any function keys except for the 3 volume controls. Certainly nothing I have to touch type. I suspect you don't use Mac OS X.

    2. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't about professionals. Apple missed that boat awhile back. Professionals need a decent keyboard. Ooops. Professionals need computing horsepower. Not quite oops but certainly nothing high end about the presumed stats. And don't talk to me about soldering RAM on the motherboard.

      Professionals need ports. More than one or two. Dongles are for dorks. Professionals need batteries. Professionals need screens that do not double as a mirror. Nor do they need 3D touch or the latest silly gizmo thingy that Apple dreamed up.

      Professionals DON'T need super thin. Professionals are strong. They can cart around a few extra ounces. Triple shot 16 oz mochas go a long way. As long as they can get their work done, we're happy. Professionals actually need a decent graphics system.

      And for the love of God, bring back the 17 inch MacBook Pro.

      Gotta go. Nurse says its time for morning meds.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      I very rarely use any function keys except for the 3 volume controls. Certainly nothing I have to touch type. I suspect you don't use Mac OS X.

      I use a Macbook Pro and I DO use the function keys .. albeit when I am either running windows VMs (which I commonly do) or when remoted into a windows computer.

      Perhaps for pure OS X usage they are underused, but for a professional user they are a required tool.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by organgtool · · Score: 2

      I agree with everything you've said. My 17-inch MBP is almost 10 years old and I refuse to replace it with the newer models that have a smaller screen, fewer ports, and no ability to upgrade the memory, storage, or battery. Apple should rename the MBP because there's almost nothing "Pro" about it anymore - it's barely even "Prosumer".

    5. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2

      This isn't about professionals. Apple missed that boat awhile back. Professionals need a decent keyboard. Ooops.

      You mean the Apple specific keyboard layout? Been using that and PC keyboards for years, rarely have any problems switching.

      Professionals need computing horsepower. Not quite oops but certainly nothing high end about the presumed stats.

      On your local box? For what? Graphics programming? Game programming? Photoshop Work? Only the last one would make any sense to me, no serious developer develops games for the Mac because. For any other kind of development I have plenty of horsepower on the development machines I use but I'd still like better graphics performance on the Mac so I'll echo any criticism of Apple's graphics performance.

      And don't talk to me about soldering RAM on the motherboard.

      Never had a reason to be pissed off about that but I suppose if you want to do heavy duty graphics work or something you might miss that option although, if you are in such a busines why not just buy a machine with proper RAM right off the bat? It's not that much more expensive.

      Professionals need ports. More than one or two. Dongles are for dorks.

      Yes they do and no they are not?

      Professionals need batteries.

      6-7 hours is not enough? What are you doing rendering 3D on your laptop at maximum CPU during a train ride? /

      Professionals need screens that do not double as a mirror.

      Eh? Some people like glossy displays others like matt ones I suppose it might be a good idea to offer matt displays as an option but how many of Apple's competitors do that? Personally I don't give a rodent's rear.

      Nor do they need 3D touch or the latest silly gizmo thingy that Apple dreamed up.

      You mean Force Touch and haptic feedback? You can turn that off.

      Professionals DON'T need super thin. Professionals are strong. They can cart around a few extra ounces. Triple shot 16 oz mochas go a long way. As long as they can get their work done, we're happy.

      A number of professionals I know including a large number who do not even use Apple products would disagree with you on that one. If I want a weight lifting exercise I'll go to the gym. In the mean time I'll take my computers in the smallest format I can get.

      Professionals actually need a decent graphics system. And for the love of God, bring back the 17 inch MacBook Pro.

      I'll give you that one although I don't play many games, Apple's choice of graphics cards has sometimes sucked and I do miss good graphics cards and proper OpenGL performance for other purposes than gaming which I consider a waste of time for the most part.

      Gotta go. Nurse says its time for morning meds.

      True, and nice rant/troll.

    6. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by berj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think your definition of professional is different than mine.

      I write software every day on my MBP. It's got a ton of ports and the battery lasts me more than an entire working day. The keyboard is *fantastic*. I used to have a ton of RSI problems with all of the typing I do. I tried many different keyboards over the last 20 years (ergonomic/split keyboards included). It wasn't until I started using the thin aluminum mac keyboards that all of my wrist and finger pain went away for good. The current MBP laptop keyboards are similarly fantastic for me.

      I've typed on the new super thin MB keyboard for maybe 10 minutes and at first blush the keys feel fantastic to me. Just enough response and feedback but very low finger strain. The jury is still out on whether I could handle it for 8 hours a day, every day but the indications point to yes. I can spend 5 seconds on a shitty keyboard and I know I don't like it.

      I travel sometimes multiple times a month with my laptop. I want the thinnest and lightest I can get while also getting the performance I want (the current crop of MBPs gives me that). 7-10 hours of battery life is way more than enough for me.

      I run (and write software for) 3D animation software and rendering software on my MBP. The graphics system is just fine for what I need when I'm travelling. It's not going to compete with my Mac Pro or the thousands of Linux CPUs in my render farm but I don't need it to.

      I get a *ton* of work done with and because of my MBP.

      This is not to say that everyone does or even should have my same experience or needs.. but neither is the converse true that no professional is like me in finding these machines to be basically perfect for them.

    7. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Same here. You can take my 17 inch MBP away from my cold, dead hands. And, at the rate that it is chugging along with the rate that I'm falling apart, that might well happen......

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can take my 17 inch MBP away from my cold, dead hands.

      Well, I could try, but I probably wouldn't get far before calling a taxi.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    9. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by friedmud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely agree with your entire post.

      I'm a professional developing high-performance, scientific simulation software. My entire development team (which is about 50 scientists) all use 15" MBPs and MacPro desktops... all backed by large linux clusters for the heavy lifting.

      MBPs are just the perfect mix of power and portability.

      As long as they keep battery life about the same I would love for mine to be thinner and lighter. We travel a lot for conferences and meetings and any weight savings is always a blessing.

      I always find it funny that people think "pros" want a huge Dell brick of a laptop...

    10. Re:Apple is copying...Lenovo? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      > If I want a weight lifting exercise I'll go to the gym. In
      > the mean time I'll take my computers in the smallest
      > format I can get.

      ^^^ This. So very much this.

      I hate, Hate, HATE "desktop replacement" laptops. Even the 13" Retina MBP is just too damn big and too damn heavy. I have a nice, beefy, multi-monitor, stationary, desktop for primary productivity. Laptops are for mobility. My 11" MacBook Air is easily the best laptop I've ever used. All but silent, small enough to be usable in the air even in coach, wakes from sleep faster than I can open it, almost too light to even be noticeable... I'm sometimes just amazed that I ever tolerated anything larger. And for my normal mobile workflow, (mostly bash, a couple of browser tabs, and Sublime Text); I even get a full workday out of the thing. So I can usually save myself carrying around the power adaptor too! Granted, with the reduced screen real estate, I'm not as productive as on the desktop. But I neither expect, nor am expected, to be.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  3. Please stop. by lw54 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My iphone is warped. Your products are becoming crap. Please stop. Full stop.

    I don't want a thinner laptop but I would like a more tactile keyboard. (sent from my 2015 mac pro)

  4. Innovation by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And who said innovation was dead? OLED touch bars are what I want!

  5. Gimmicky changes by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Swapping the function keys for a touch bar is gimmicky on a machine that is labeled as "pro". And that is before even getting to the stories of OLED burn in.
    Upgraded ports are always nice, but again on a Pro model you need to have as many as you can cram in.

    But what is obviously missing from TFA is the things that make a computer important: CPU, memory, drive space, screen resolution. None of them get a mention.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Gimmicky changes by djbckr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple doesn't make computers. They make toys. No point in listing specs for a toy.

      When I compare my Mac to my Toshiba, or really any other laptop, the Mac feels more solid, works faster, and crashes less than any other computer I've ever seen. I know I'm feeding a troll, but you obviously have never really used a Mac. You would change your mind if you did.

    2. Re:Gimmicky changes by macs4all · · Score: 2

      They believe that a closed ecosystem is the best way to promote their products.

      Are you conflating iOS and the iOS App Store with OS X?

      And that's not even true of iOS. Just fire up XCode and have at it. Anything your little heart desires you can code for yourself. No Dev license required.

      Oh, and BTW, you didn't mention that Apple gives away its IDE. I guess that's yet another example of their "closed ecosystem". (rolls eyes)

    3. Re:Gimmicky changes by macs4all · · Score: 2

      locked down OS X

      In what way? Because they "hid" (until you un-hide them) some system directories from the noobs who have no business in them anyway? I mean, WTF good can EVER come from Grandma poking around and deleting things in /System, or /Library?

      Or perhaps it's because they made the Default for Gatekeeper such that noobs were less likely to fubar their system with malware, just because they were duped into installing some random thing from a scarebait banner-ad?

      Bottom line: If you think OS X really is "locked down", then you don't have the requisite knowledge to be poking around under the hood, anyway. That's not conceit; it's a fact.

  6. Why not OLED for the whole screen? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2

    Is it still too expensive to make an OLED screen that big?

    1. Re:Why not OLED for the whole screen? by danbob999 · · Score: 2

      They make it for much larger 4k TVs, so I guess it's possible.
      Apple is not a strong backer of OLED however. They still use LCD on their $800 iPhones.

  7. Re:Great, here come the fanboys by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You'll notice that over the last few years, even the fanboys are getting annoyed by the stupid shit Apple is doing.

    Keys with less travel on a supposedly "pro" laptop? Thinner computers for the sake of... what, exactly? People want more battery life, Apple keeps innovating on that end but it only results in the same battery life because they stupidly keep making their laptops thinner.

    The low-end computers keep getting slow 5400 RPM drives, as if 7200 RPM drives were somehow incredibly more expensive. And Apple keeps using laptop parts in desktop computers which is just insane, not to mention that they're even making their desktop computers thinner. That doesn't help anyone. The last straw is that they're now soldering the RAM, meaning you can't even upgrade your computer a few years later. That's the complete opposite of being a green company. You can use all the solar panels all you want, Apple, it doesn't mean squat if your hardware gets discarded sooner than it needs to be.

  8. No wonder Apple is losing money by hsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been waiting to upgrade my MBP for a year now. It is a 2012 and feeling long in the tooth. Been waiting for a "redesign" - but Q4? Lord.

  9. Zero innovation by cachimaster · · Score: 2

    The last time Apple innovated was with the iphone, in 2007. It basically have the same product line for 10 years straight.

    Meanwhile, Lenovo and Dell keep throwing out freak notebook after notebook, with the hope that some design sticks, and some actually do (Yoga, Hybrid tablets, rugged notebooks, etc.)

  10. Nobody wants thinner and lighter. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    We want Fatter with multi day batter and 17 freaking inches in size with a retina display.. The fact that used 17" MBP laptops are going UP in value are a fantastic indicator of this. It's the only peice of electronics outside of an Apple -I that gains in value almost daily.

    Give us a workstation 17" that is fat as the 2012 MBP that allows the installation of 2-3 .2 SSD drives and the option to install metric buttloads of ram.

    Dammit Apple, people will pay $2500-$3000 for that.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Not if I can't upgrade my own laptop. by Jethro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm writing this on an Early 2011 15" Macbook Pro, which is frankly on it's last legs. In fact, it's at the point where I can't really move it around.

    It would have been pretty unusable years ago, except that this is one of the last Macbook Pros that you could upgrade the RAM and harddrive on. I got this thing with the least amount of RAM and cheapest harddrive I could, and as time went on I added more RAM and an SSD. New lease of life. And that stuff all cost me about $250 rather than the extra > $1000 Apple would have charged.

    I want (and pretty much need) a new laptop, and Apple makes great ones. Yeah, people say "Apple Tax!" a lot, but spec-for-spec, Apple laptops are pretty much equal to other manufacturers and the *usability* is *phenomenally* better. From the UI design to the friggin *trackpad*.

    But if I can't upgrade my own machine... sorry, not happening. And that goes for any other laptop maker.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Not if I can't upgrade my own laptop. by Jethro · · Score: 2

      EVERY manufacturer charges insane amounts for their own RAM and HDD upgrades. If I buy a Lenovo or HP or Acer or whatever, they'll likely charge you $400 (or more) to go from 8 gigs to 16 gigs, even though I can get 16 gigs on Amazon for well under $100.

      Apple has become way more extreme about making their laptops unupgradable. They claim this is in the name of design and efficiency, and yes, to a degree it is. Doesn't make it OK for me, though.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  12. Mac Pro, want by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Informative

    No interest at ALL in a macbook. Miserable chicklet keys, extremely limited I/O, small display... meh.

    I would be interested (VERY!) in a new Mac Pro if they go back to a real computer case that can hold multiple drives, allows memory expansion, choice of and multiples of, graphics cards, a reasonable measure of physical security (a surface full of desk warts I most definitely do NOT want.) The current round model simply drove me to EBay to buy older units. I'd be interested in a couple of minis, too, if they were still actually upgrading them instead of downgrading them. Apple's choosing to go backwards with CPU capacity and memory upgradability closed the mini door pretty sharply.

    Honestly, I think Apple has lost their way in the computer space. They've left a trail of severely buggy, unfixed OS's behind them, broken applications and services, dropped support for various aspects of the system, pretty much hosed the app store, limited (or eliminated) expandability and choice, built a bewilderingly non-functional macpro, knocked the mini back to much less of a computer than it used to be, and are pathologically fixed on the "thinner, thinner" mantra and associated tunnel-vision-like goals while functionality and bugfixing goes wanting.

    I like working with OS X, but without the company having a decent vision, I can't move along with Apple, I just hang with my current OS level and hardware, or buy more hardware from the same series off EBay, and continue waiting to see if Apple is going to come to their senses, or not. I test my commercial and free software development under the latest OS X, but I don't use it, because it simply isn't functional enough. Things like missing PPC emulation are show-stoppers for me, I have many thousands of $ of PPC apps that work just fine and no intention of abandoning them, nor is it convenient to only run them in a VM. Nothing else I can really do. Don't like Windows, been there, been burned by Microsoft, not going back; and until/unless linux builds in a standard GUI layer I can depend upon without compromising my commercial software development financially or GPL-wise, it's not even in the running.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  13. Does marketing actually TALK to humans? by geekmux · · Score: 2

    It's obvious to me now that the mindless marketing drones at Apple need to spend more time around humans to understand that we can actually carry around a portable device that weighs more than a dog fart. Sorry, but I just don't get the whole lighter and thinner bullshit, especially after Bendgate.

    With all the damn statistics and metrics being captured in this world today, it floors me that companies still feel zero need to actually ASK the damn customer what they would want or even need in a new laptop design. I'm willing to bet exactly no one was demanding or even asking about thinner at this point, and weight is a pathetic metric anyway when everything out there is already been reduced considerably in the last few years. We're humans, not mice.

  14. Re:Great, here come the fanboys by c · · Score: 2

    Thinner computers for the sake of... what, exactly?

    The theory is that if they can make them thin and light enough, they'll see a sales increase due to people rebuying stuff that they lost in the couch cushions or that got blown away in a brisk wind.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  15. Hackintoshing by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Have you considered [...] a hackintosh?

    Not into violating software agreements, terms of service, etc. As far as I know, OS X isn't licensed for use on non-Mac hardware. Be interesting to learn differently, though. Are you aware of a legally clear path to do this? If the answer to that is yes, the next question would be, are you aware of a high-end machine where OS X will install cleanly without any screwing around?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  16. I don't get it by erp_consultant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is Apple stubbornly staying with soldered memory when users clearly don't like it? Are they not supposed to be the company of great customer service that loves and listens to their community? Not in this case. I can sure see how it benefits Apple to do it that way but Joe Public...not so much.

    Here is my wish list:

    1) Bring back the 17" Macbook Pro. Yes it's big and bulky but I'm willing to put up with that for the extra screen real estate.
    2) Bring back user upgradable memory. If it truly is a Macbook Pro then it should come with 8GB minimum and I should be able to plug in up to 32GB (or maybe even 64) as and when I need it. If the laptop was aimed at home users I could maybe see not wanting them to be able to do this but I'm a professional and I know how to open laptops and upgrade them. I should be able to do this on my own and without a trip to the Genius lab.
    3) Ports - lots of them. Wireless is nice but sometimes I prefer a hardwired network connection. Gimme a network port. I also need a couple of HDMI ports and at least 3 USB ports. Why not throw in a Firewire port too? I know that it's kind of old technology now but a lot of people still have firewire drives and would like to be able to plug them in.
    4) Bootcamp. Why not have the option to have Bootcamp pre-installed if you know you're going to use it? Or maybe a prebuilt virtualized Windows. Yes, some of use would prefer to do it ourselves but others might appreciate the convenience.
    5) I'm tired of the race to the thinnest laptop. I want something with a battery big enough to last the whole day, or more, doing intensive processing. If that adds a half pound or a half inch so be it. This is supposed to be a big boy laptop, not some hipster toy.
    6) 4K display. Could you imagine a 4K display on a sweet 17" laptop with a matte finish? Heaven.

    Until then I'm hanging on to my creaky old 2008 era Macbook Pro.

    1. Re:I don't get it by dbc · · Score: 2

      Well, yes and no. YMMV.

      1) Bring back the 17" Macbook Pro. Yes it's big and bulky but I'm willing to put up with that for the extra screen real estate.

      Not for me, thanks.

      2) Bring back user upgradable memory. If it truly is a Macbook Pro then it should come with 8GB minimum and I should be able to plug in up to 32GB (or maybe even 64) as and when I need it. If the laptop was aimed at home users I could maybe see not wanting them to be able to do this but I'm a professional and I know how to open laptops and upgrade them. I should be able to do this on my own and without a trip to the Genius lab.

      Well, having run the numbers on other products, I know that every connector is a reliability liability. If the memory is soldered in and factory tested, the machine will be more reliable for you, and have fewer warranty issues for Apple. I'm with Apple on this one.

      3) Ports - lots of them. Wireless is nice but sometimes I prefer a hardwired network connection. Gimme a network port. I also need a couple of HDMI ports and at least 3 USB ports. Why not throw in a Firewire port too? I know that it's kind of old technology now but a lot of people still have firewire drives and would like to be able to plug them in.

      Truth.

      4) Bootcamp. Why not have the option to have Bootcamp pre-installed if you know you're going to use it? Or maybe a prebuilt virtualized Windows. Yes, some of use would prefer to do it ourselves but others might appreciate the convenience.

      You have a good idea here, although for my use I want a Linux VM.

      5) I'm tired of the race to the thinnest laptop. I want something with a battery big enough to last the whole day, or more, doing intensive processing. If that adds a half pound or a half inch so be it. This is supposed to be a big boy laptop, not some hipster toy.

      Truth

      6) 4K display. Could you imagine a 4K display on a sweet 17" laptop with a matte finish? Heaven.

      I can imagine it, but I probably wouldn't be able to see the fine detail because my vision just isn't that good any more. But I *do* want the ability to drive a 4K external monitor the size of a football pitch right out of the box, using some kind of modern video subsystem.

    2. Re:I don't get it by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

      I hear what you're saying about the memory soldering. But I have to say that my 2008 Macbook Pro has been rock solid and I have added memory more than once. so the connectors have not been an issue, at least for me. Besides, how many times would someone add or remove memory? Not more than a few times I would think. My issue with soldering the memory is that once you buy the laptop you cannot upgrade the memory. What happens to the person that cannot spring for the extra money for the memory right then or the person that buys the laptop thinking it will be fine and they come to find out later that they need more memory? With the soldered memory you are SOL. And, admittedly, I do like to tinker and I just feel like I'm missing out if I can't fiddle with stuff :-)

  17. I don't know the investments he's trying to rescue by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know the investments he's trying to rescue... but Ming-Chi Kuo at KGI Securities has been predicting OLED and AMOLED displays for Apple products the last 3 releases, and Apple has not been stupid enough to oblige him with a product containing one.

    Also, I can not see Jony Ive putting a different looking bar at the top where the functions keys normally go, and breaking up the overall design into three zones that end up looking so incredibly different from each other, and certainly, not to draw a display down where it ends up taking up attention from the main display. That just totally violates the design principles he espouses when you talk to him about it.

    But I'm sure a lot of people clicked that link, which I guess is the point...

  18. Why all the hate? by Codeyman · · Score: 2

    I code for a living, and I love my mac book air to death. I use it mainly as a thin client to connect to servers/build servers to do actual heavy lifting.. and the usual presentation/writing work for which this is more than enough. This is connected to an external keyboard and display.
    The battery lasts for around 6 hours, which is good enough to last a conference. I would rather have a thin *nix machine than a heavy one. If you'd rather have a heavy box that you don't want to move, get a desktop.