Slashdot Mirror


State Dept. IT Staff Told To Keep Quiet About Clinton's Server (computerworld.com)

dcblogs writes this report from Computerworld: Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's decision to use a private email server ran afoul of the government's IT security and record retention requirements, according to a report by the department's inspector general released today. This use of a private email server did not go unnoticed within the Department of State's IT department. Two IT staff members who raised concerns about Clinton's use of a private server were told not to speak of it. Clinton was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 and during that period she used a private email server in her New York home. This report by the Department of State's Inspector General about Clinton's use of a private server makes clear that rules and regulations were not followed. It says that Clinton would not have received approval for this server had she sought it. According to the current CIO, the report said, "Secretary Clinton had an obligation to discuss using her personal email account to conduct official business with their offices, who in turn would have attempted to provide her with approved and secured means that met her business needs." However, the report notes, according to these officials, The Bureau of Diplomatic Security and IRM (Bureau of Information Resource Management) "did not -- and would not -- approve her exclusive reliance on a personal email account to conduct Department business, because of the restrictions in the FAM [Foreign Affairs Manual] and the security risks in doing so."

6 of 371 comments (clear)

  1. top security by Moblaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    This was a clear example of security through obscurity. The server was behind a NAT protected by a Huawei router. What could go wrong?

    1. Re:top security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, we've been assured that there's no evidence the server was hacked by the guy who said he hacked it.

      The fact that we don't have any logs from the server to show that is, of course, completely immaterial.

      After all, it's best practice to simply never log anything, so that there will never be any evidence that you were compromised.

    2. Re:top security by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds pretty secure to me. Show an 8 inch floppy disk to an evil hacker in Eastern Europe- he'll think it's part of a swivel chair!

    3. Re: top security by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh don't worry, Hillary will just email them to a more responsible person.

    4. Re:top security by jvanber · · Score: 4, Funny

      If Windows 10 gave massages, I'd be running it now.

    5. Re:top security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Correct the Record here, your wrong! And your ugly! Hillary is perfect, I'm with her!!!
      And that old communist should quit now! YESTERDAY!