Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft and Facebook Building Underwater Transatlantic 'MAREA' Data Cable (betanews.com)

An anonymous reader writes: On Thursday, Microsoft and Facebook announced a partnership to build a transatlantic subsea data cable. Called 'MAREA' (Editor's note: it is Spanish for "tide"), it will connect the United States to Europe. More specifically, it will connect the State of Virginia to the country of Spain. The project will begin this August, with a targeted completion date of October 2017.Microsoft says: "MAREA will be the highest-capacity subsea cable to ever cross the Atlantic -- featuring eight fiber pairs and an initial estimated design capacity of 160Tbps. The new 6,600 km submarine cable system, to be operated and managed by Telxius, will also be the first to connect the United States to southern Europe: from Virginia Beach, Virginia to Bilbao, Spain and then beyond to network hubs in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. This route is south of existing transatlantic cable systems that primarily land in the New York/New Jersey region. Being physically separate from these other cables helps ensure more resilient and reliable connections for our customers in the United States, Europe, and beyond."

The fact that these two giants felt the need to have their own cables indicates how much data they intend to move. Wired has an in-depth piece on it (though the publication blocks users with adblockers).

64 comments

  1. Woot - I live in VB :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VB to European gaming, how convenient for the future of E-Sports :)

  2. adblock filter to stop them from stopping you by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Informative

    xxhttp://www.wired.com/assets/load?scripts=true&c=1&load%5B%5D=jquery-sonar,wpcom-lazy-load-images,outbrain,blockadblock,tracking,ads,wired,wp-embed&ver=1464209915

    (remove first 2 'x' chars from edited url)

    you know, bloggers, you cannot stop us. if we want to block ads, we will.

    oh, and FUCK YOU very much.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:adblock filter to stop them from stopping you by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 1

      Don't know what's up with Wired, but I was able to read the article just fine (using uBlock Origin and Ghostery).

      --
      -SR
    2. Re:adblock filter to stop them from stopping you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My uBlock didn't block any script on the page, however NoScript is doing it's job and keeping 15 different domains from loading shit.

    3. Re:adblock filter to stop them from stopping you by mi · · Score: 1

      oh, and FUCK YOU very much.

      This does not look like an invitation for romantic love-making — the sex will be forceful and against the recipient's will...

      Why do you hate them so much? If you like their content enough to bother tuning your ad-blocker, you are supposed to thank them, not curse them...

      Reminds me of the attitude towards movie-studios and musicians — they are shitheads, and their content is shit, but people still want it. Want it badly enough to complain on Slashdot, when they can't get it...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:adblock filter to stop them from stopping you by grub · · Score: 1

      I blocked subscribe.wired.com from running scripts and it's fine here.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:adblock filter to stop them from stopping you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocked all jscript, as I always do outside a VM, and it shows fine (so suxx to all those who whine the entire web is broken without scripting; it ain't).

    6. Re:adblock filter to stop them from stopping you by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      GGBlocker pulled up a copy that was both cached and ad-free. (I think the odds of it pulling an ad-free page depend on whether whoever first cached the page had an ad-blocker active.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  3. Tide or sick? by desertfool · · Score: 1

    Doesn't marea also mean feeling sick, like you are going to throw up, in Spanish?

    --
    Just a dude. Stuck in IT.
    1. Re:Tide or sick? by PmanAce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. That would be mareado. I can see where you would think the root of the word would extend the meaning of the word, but alas no.

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    2. Re: Tide or sick? by Lije+Baley · · Score: 2

      Looks like they both have a common root - "sea". As in "undersea cable" and "sea of barf".

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    3. Re:Tide or sick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it can also be interpreted as 'It makes dizzy', but that's not the meaning a native speaker would give the word without context. Without context the meaning is tide.

    4. Re:Tide or sick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That would be mareado. I can see where you would think the root of the word would extend the meaning of the word, but alas no.

      Actually, "marea" would be the accusative form of the verb, as in "it makes you queasy"

  4. How much of this is about data by H3lldr0p · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and how much of this is about security.

    It wasn't all that long ago we found out that the US and UK governments had tapped into the current Atlantic cables in order to spy. I presume that this new cable isn't going to hosting public traffic, just what those two companies and anyone who pays them send down them. If a government was attempt to tap into it, not only would it probably be fairly easy to detect but it'd also cause some actionable litigation. Which would be the last thing any spy would want to come to light.

    Conversely, who knows what hoops they had to hop through in order to get this project off the ground. Would it surprise anyone if there was some governing language which says "you have to let us tap" no matter who owns the cable?

    1. Re:How much of this is about data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting point. I worked in Spain for a web design company for almost a decade, and the people there just don't care about or use the Internet. The UK or France would make much more sense as a termination point instead of Spain, so your theory might be right.

    2. Re:How much of this is about data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a good argument except Va Beach is home to a SEAL team and right next door to a harbor with a lot of Navy subs in it. So, it's not going to remain untapped for very long.

    3. Re:How much of this is about data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The taps would be at either ends of the cable. There is a story about the first time they tried to tap a fibre-optic cable. They hauled the cable out of the water into the underside cavity of the submarine, filleted open the cable, teased out the fibre optic bundle, attempted to tap into the digital stream of one fibre-optic strand and were blasted with a time-sliced multiplexed error-code corrected stream of data. Then they realized that more advanced decoding systems would be needed.

    4. Re:How much of this is about data by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      The major carriers collude with the US and UK and allow them to just connect directly into the 10GigE payloads as they come out of the equipment in the landing stations. Nothing but commodity network equipment involved. Theoretically FB and MS could prevent that if they own the cable.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  5. Privacy Concern by chr1st1anSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Both companies are known for their data collection/mining of their user base, so this concerns me a bit. I know the article says the cable will be managed by Telxius but I wonder how much influence Microsoft and Facebook will have over that management? They are calling the cable "open" but they proceed to speak about how much benefit it will be to the Azure platform and possible Facebook. Will MS and FB traffic always have priority over everyone else? I just don't trust this whole endeavor because I really don't trust either of these two companies anymore.

    1. Re:Privacy Concern by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...I really don't trust either of these two companies anymore.

      They were trustworthy once?

    2. Re:Privacy Concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a longer cable on a parallel route. Even if it does have Microsoft and Facebook packet priority, the net effect on the 'Net will be an increase in transatlantic throughput (until all the additional bandwidth is consumed by less careful decision making with regard to what data to send).

      If it has deep packet sniffing, that's another question. We know many nations already route their internet pathway through a monitoring facility, but since those are usually topographically cul-de-sacs they do not regularly get access to packets not intended to pass through that hub anyway.
      I suppose there are three options you can take
      1) accept the increased bandwidth as increased bandwidth
      2) Tor everything just in case it might pass through a monitored cable (with the knowledge that many Tor exit nodes are under active surveillance)
      3) investigate Telxius to the best of your ability to decide whether to then follow choice 1 or 2

    3. Re:Privacy Concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it interesting that they are at 16 fibers. I would have expected them to do 24. I am not sure how they computer 160TB. I would have estimated the date rate to be 1% of that, assuming you are counting each direction of bidirectional traffic.

    4. Re:Privacy Concern by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought as well, however they already have control of your data on both ends (and blatantly violate your privacy) so this is no new issue. I tend to agree that this is at least partly about avoiding NSA surveillance, or at least, putting a toll booth on the surveillance. But the prime motivator no doubt is cost: why pay a premium to a carrier? Unless the carrier can somehow do the job more cost efficiently, a distinct possibility.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:Privacy Concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also more than a few TLA's in Virginia. Coincidence? I think not.

    6. Re:Privacy Concern by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      There's also more than a few TLA's in Virginia. Coincidence? I think not.

      I suppose there are, but TPC is in New Jersey, and it's a TLA too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    7. Re:Privacy Concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government won't be tapping into this, and they don't need to...
      BECAUSE THEY HAVE ALREADY BEEN ***GIVEN*** ACCESS AT THEIR """REQUEST""" BY THE COMPANIES INVOLVED!!!
      Facebook, Microsoft, Telcos, and Cable Operators are very well known for both:
      - Doing whatever the Government wants
      - Keeping quiet and not saying anything public about or against it

      Only Apple, Lavabit, Calyx, and to a far lesser extent Google, have stood up against the Government's bullshit.

      Thousands of companies all kissing ass.
      And maybe like a maximum of ten ever saying anything and doing the right thing.

      What a fucking shame!

      Also, transit over this pipe will be made *EXTREMELY INEXPENSIVE*, so that providers would be STUPID to not adjust BGP to route over this, thus vacuuming up all that lovely Euro/Mideast/Fareast traffic including the US traffic... to flow through the US, right through the lovely Virgina NSA Beach Bunkers.

  6. Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was able to view it with AdBlock just fine.

  7. you THINK I make JOEK??!!1 by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Actually, they're preparing to move their datacenters OUT OF THE USA because of the NSA's insistence on cutting our own throat on privacy.
    Also, in case TRUMP/HILLARY gets into office.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:you THINK I make JOEK??!!1 by swb · · Score: 1

      What will that really get them? Most any place with enough infrastructure and rule of law to run a datacenter at that scale is also vulnerable to the NSA indirectly through the local security services, outright black ops or vulnerable to the kind diplomatic pressure that would give the NSA carte blanche.

      Fucking Switzerland caved on bank secrecy -- and that was SWITZERLAND and BANK SECRECY. The rest of Western Europe lacks neither the stated neutrality nor the tradition to stop them.

    2. Re:you THINK I make JOEK??!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In case? It's inevitable that one of the two candidates wins the election. I just hope the angry, uncompromising Bernouts don't let the right wing lunatics elect the candidate that re-tweets and panders to white supremacists.

    3. Re:you THINK I make JOEK??!!1 by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Well. Since MS and Facebook have customers in many, many countries, they already have data centers in many countries. Azure has been building data centers everywhere.

      Thing is, they're not going to close the US ones. They're just going to offer the option for future growth to be local.

      I do agree that the privacy snafus have made it hard to host everything in the US. Even Canada doesn't want their data in the US. We're actually considering putting Canadian data in the EU data centers.

      Yes, they care more about data privacy than transatlantic latency.

      However, they are finalizing the EU Privacy Shield, which should hopefully help a little bit. Ultimately, the US is shooting itself in the foot with some of this. On the other hand, I think some of the people in the foreign countries are probably overreacting. OMG my Facebook data could be seen by someone! I mean... yeah, it can. So, don't post it on Facebook. Seriously. It may be much cheaper than buying a billboard to display your pics, but its about the same idea.

    4. Re:you THINK I make JOEK??!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the sad thing is that the problem is not Bernie supporters, but the shear amount of Trumpets there supporting the nutter (for whatever the reason) and until People grow a pair of reasons not to support nut cases the problem will be still there no matter who wins

    5. Re:you THINK I make JOEK??!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The numb nuts in the EU bitch about the NSA and want to move data centers to their own countries to supposedly protect their citizens privacy. This is first class bullshit because the European intelligence agencies were the ones collecting the data on their citizens and sharing it with the US intelligence agencies. So moving data centers from the US to Europe is going to protect their citizens privacy? And lets not forget that if a state sanctioned intelligence agency really wants data stored on a particular server they will get what they want regardless of where the servers maybe located. This EU posturing is nothing more than a shake down on large US corporations. They cannot compete with any successful US multi-national corporations so passing laws and statutes aimed at collecting money. Their protestations about security and privacy are just a cover for a naked cash grab. They should just step up and admit what they are doing and stop spouting nonsense about how they can provide a safe haven for data on their citizens.

  8. Just Use Brave browser to stop the adblock blockin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The browser named "Brave" will block the adblock blocking and let you use the website.

  9. redmond and teh zuck each not big enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to take on google, so they team up. That's clear enough.

    But why Bilbao and not, oh, A Coruña maybe? Or maybe even Porto or Lisbon? Also, why no drop line to the Azores?

  10. 8 fiber pairs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe 1/16 inch cable?
    I mean- really, just 8 pairs? that's just not impressive. and not believable.

    Lets just say it - 8 pairs could be 1024 pairs, in about the same space...
    and allow rental of lines ( if only someone would rent a pair - but they would listen, watch and snoop ).

    1. Re:8 fiber pairs.... by richy+freeway · · Score: 2

      More pairs = more power required for repeaters.

      There was a pretty good article explaining all this on Ars yesterday.

      http://arstechnica.com/informa...

  11. To illustrate the problem by pr0t0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those without ad blocking and wondering what the fuss is about. Wired wants to run all of these scripts from external parties, and many of them are designed to track your movements on the internet (from uMatrix; quotes added to prevent active links).

    "http://static.chartbeat.com/js/chartbeat_pub.js"
    "https://api.pinterest.com/v1/urls/count.json?url=https://www.wired.com/2016/05/facebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic/&callback=jQuery110206650303718502966_1464288559115&_=1464288559116"
    "https://api.pinterest.com/v1/urls/count.json?url=http://www.wired.com/2016/05/facebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic&callback=jQuery110206650303718502966_1464288559113&_=1464288559114"
    "https://api.pinterest.com/v1/urls/count.json?url=https://www.wired.com/2016/05/facebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic&callback=jQuery110206650303718502966_1464288559111&_=1464288559112"
    "http://odb.outbrain.com/utils/get?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2F2016%2F05%2Ffacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic%2F&srcUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2Ffeed%2F&settings=true&recs=true&widgetJSId=JS_1&key=NANOWDGT01&idx=0&version=01000800&ref=&apv=false&sig=BUWB40TZ&format=japi&rand=89184&winW=1200&winH=1835&adblck=false"
    "https://plugin.mediavoice.com/plugin.js"
    "http://condenast.demdex.net/event?d_nsid=0&d_ld=_ts%3D1464288559450&c_pageName=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2F2016%2F05%2Ffacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic&c_events=event82%3D52%2Cevent2%2Cevent26%2Cevent27&c_eVar2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2F2016%2F05%2Ffacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic&c_prop3=Facebook%20and%20Microsoft%20Are%20Laying%20a%20Giant%20Cable%20Across%20the%20Atlantic%20%7C%20WIRED&c_eVar3=Facebook%20and%20Microsoft%20Are%20Laying%20a%20Giant%20Cable%20Across%20the%20Atlantic%20%7C%20WIRED&c_prop4=2025402&c_eVar4=2025402&c_prop5=Article%7Cinset&c_eVar5=Article%7Cinset&c_prop6=business&c_eVar6=business&c_prop7=business%2Fenterprise&c_eVar7=business%2Fenterprise&c_prop8=business%2Fenterprise%2Fnull&c_eVar8=business%2Fenterprise%2Fnull&c_prop9=business%2Fenterprise%2Fnull%2Fnull&c_eVar9=business%2Fenterprise%2Fnull%2Fnull&c_prop11=2%3A00PM&c_eVar11=2%3A00PM&c_prop12=Thursday&c_eVar12=Thursday&c_prop13=Weekday&c_eVar13=Weekday&c_prop16=Not%20Logged%20in&c_eVar16=Not%20Logged%20in&c_prop17=2&c_eVar17=2&c_prop23=Repeat&c_eVar23=Repeat&c_prop50=business%7Centerprise%7Cbroadband%7Cdata-centers%7Cfacebook%7Cgoogle%7Cmicrosoft%7Ctelecoms%7Ccade-metz%7Ctype-post%7Cprimary-category-business%7Ccategory-business%7Ccategory-enterprise%7Cinset%7Csingle%7C2016%7C05%7Cfacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic&c_eVar50=business%7Centerprise%7Cbroadband%7Cdata-centers%7Cfacebook%7Cgoogle%7Cmicrosoft%7Ctelecoms%7Ccade-metz%7Ctype-post%7Cprimary-category-business%7Ccategory-business%7Ccategory-enterprise%7Cinset%7Csingle%7C2016%7C05%7Cfacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic&c_prop51=Non-Mobile&c_eVar51=Non-Mobile&c_prop55=Cade%20Metz&c_eVar55=Cade%20Metz&d_rtbd=json&d_jsonv=1&d_dst=1&d_cts=1&d_cb=demdexRequestCallback1464288559450"
    "http://static.parsely.com/p.js"
    "http://wired.disqus.com/count.js"
    "http://wired.disqus.com/embed.js"
    "http://dy48bnzanqw0v.cloudfront.net/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2F2016%2F05%2Ffacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic%2F&mapping=4po&jsonp=CN.ad.cnds.tags%3D"
    "http://dff7tx5c2qbxc.cloudfront.net/hot/wiredcom.dart/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2F2016%2F05%2Ffacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic%2F"
    "https://subscribe.wired.com/ams/page-ads.js?ad_category_prefix=2016&browser_path=%2F2016%2F05%2Ffacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic%2F&cat_prefixes=%2C2016%2C05%2Cfacebook-microsoft-laying-giant-cable-across-atlantic

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
  12. Ulterior motive? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    This is so people will have the bandwidth to (unwittingly) download the bloated Windows 10.

  13. Re:Privacy Concern-NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSA
    In their backyard

  14. British spying by Avarist · · Score: 1

    They chose spain so they can avoid being spied on by the British who read everything that passes through their country which is all transatlantic communications.

    --
    In Capitalist US, the commerce controls the Government.
    1. Re:British spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Virginia because they can attach to the servers at Langley Field - CIA

  15. They fail at blocking ad blockers by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    "(though the publication blocks users with adblockers)."

    The "Adblock Warning Removal List" fixes this. It should be used by anyone with adblock+.

    You're welcome.

  16. Atlantic spreadding zones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how does one place a cable that will cross a highly volcanic spreading vault so it won't melt / degrade? I thought most across the pond cables went around of the NA / Eurasian Plate undersea boundary (i.e. Iceland)

  17. Re:Just Use Brave browser to stop the adblock bloc by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Brave just load its own ads?

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  18. Will it cross over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somewhere in between the ends, they will need a device to reverse the bit-order going east, since it's connecting to Virginia, and that whole region of the country is basically backwards.

  19. Wavelength division multiplexing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using 25Gb/s optics at different wavelengths, it should be about 40 wavelengths per fiber... Assuming that for publicity sake we're calculating send and receive separately as is common. DWDM generally supports for than 40 wavelengths easily these days. But 25Gb/s optics are still very new, at that rate, for optics with the ranges of interest to them, it may be necessary to wait for more colors.

    1. Re:Wavelength division multiplexing by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      There are probably only 2 or 4 working fibers in the cable, due to amplifier space and power limitations. That's 80 or 160 OTU4s per pair, which is pretty easy to do with modern equipment.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Wavelength division multiplexing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using 25Gb/s optics at different wavelengths, it should be about 40 wavelengths per fiber... Assuming that for publicity sake we're calculating send and receive separately as is common. DWDM generally supports for than 40 wavelengths easily these days. But 25Gb/s optics are still very new, at that rate, for optics with the ranges of interest to them, it may be necessary to wait for more colors.

      They might be using this:

      https://www.arista.com/assets/data/pdf/Whitepapers/7500E-6CFPX_datasheet.pdf

      6 ports of 100Gb DWDM and IEEE 802.1AE defined MACsec encryption (If Arista got it working in EOS) at wire speed in one line card for the 7500E!

      - A Presales Engineer in the know.

  20. paying for does not mean building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should call the cable GMFS. Global Mother Fucking Spyware.

    https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9154737&cid=52185703

    Buy ice, Bill. The Holy Spirit is looking dead at you.

  21. This is only to skirt international law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has nothing to do with making your data safe, and everything to do with NSA being able to eavesdrops on these 'data centers' without falling under US jurisdiction.

    Heil to Bill gates! The Vaccinating, Common Coring, Privacy stealing, Automatically Upgrading, Planned Parent-hooding warrior!

  22. Already plenty lands in the UK by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    So it does make sense to land elsewhere. Honest...

  23. They want to own the Internet by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Either that or they want to build their own version of the Internet that they control, kind of like AOL on steroids.

    Stop using Facebook and Microsoft products.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  24. Specifically by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >" it will connect the United States to Europe. More specifically, it will connect the State of Virginia to the country of Spain"

    And even MORE specifically, it will connect the city of Virginia Beach in the *Commonwealth* of Virginia to the City of Bilbao in the province of Biscay in the country of Spain :)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  25. Virginia Beach by eples · · Score: 1

    There's a Navy airbase at Virginia Beach, so I'd say that's a good choice considering the Russians have been snooping around our undersea cables lately.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:Virginia Beach by AndroSyn · · Score: 1

      It's also not far from the datacenters in the DC metro area, in particular in the Ashburn, Virginia area, a few hundred miles to the northeast of Virginia Beach. Basically Virginia Beach is the closest place to land cables to the DC area.

  26. Less about reliability and more about control by foradoxium · · Score: 1

    I find it very coincidental that Ars Technica just had a very well done article on the underseas cable managed by TGN..which is already pretty effing reliable.

    Perhaps this is the very beginning of the privatization of the internet "tubes" and wrestle control of the data away from governments.

  27. Read the whole article without problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are on a *nix machine, you can block the script that blocks your adblocker (if you can follow all of that), but just popping open a terminal, open lynx and stuff the link into the line. Its a long article, with sections that are repetitive and long winded, almost like they are trying to bait people into tripping over their script so that if you want to read the whole blob, you will get smacked by their thing. There were entire paragraphs that looked a whole lot like paragraphs I had already read, with only minor differences. It looks padded and reads like someone padding an essay. In that regard it looks wooden and forced and at one point I wanted to type tl;dr. Wired is playing tricks with this crap. The most interesting part of the article is before you get smacked by their script and "no more reading words for you" crap.

  28. Article Text by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Facebook and Microsoft are laying a massive cable across the middle of the Atlantic.
    Dubbed MAREA—Spanish for “tide”—this giant underwater cable will stretch from Virginia to Bilbao, Spain, shuttling digital data across 6,600 kilometers of ocean. Providing up to 160 terabits per second of bandwidth—about 16 million times the bandwidth of your home Internet connection—it will allow the two tech titans to more efficiently move enormous amounts of information between the many computer data centers and network hubs that underpin their popular online services.
    “If you look at the cable systems across the Atlantic, a majority land in the Northeast somewhere,” says Najam Ahmad, Facebook’s vice president of network engineering. “This gives us so many more options.”
    The project expands the increasingly enormous computer networks now being built by the giants of the Internet as they assume a role traditionally played by telecom companies. Google has invested in two undersea cables that stretch from the West Coast of the United States to Japan, another that connects the US and Brazil, and a network of cables that connect various parts of Asia. Rather than just leasing bandwidth on undersea cables and terrestrial connections operated by telecoms, the likes of Google, Facebook, and Microsoft are building their own networking infrastructure both on land and across the seas.
    The fact that these Internet giants are laying their own cables—at their own expense—shows just how much data these giants must move. Consider the services they run: Google offers its eponymous search engine, Gmail, Google Docs, Google Maps, and so many more. Microsoft offers Bing, Office365, and its Azure cloud services. Facebook has its social network along with Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, and Instagram. The data moved by just a few online giants now dwarfs that of most others, so much so that, according to telecommunications research firm Telegeography, more than two thirds of the digital data moving across the Atlantic is traveling on private networks—namely networks operated by the likes of Google, Microsoft, and Facebook. That’s up from 10 percent just a few years ago. “It’s a tremendous change,” says Telegeography analyst Tim Stronge.
    With so much data flowing across their systems, these companies are scrambling to build new infrastructure. In addition to building its own undersea cable, Facebook is buying up what’s called “dark fiber”—unused terrestrial cables—so that it can control how its data moves from place to place and move it more efficiently. According to Ahmad, Facebook is now using dark fiber “pretty much everywhere” as the company expands its network into new regions. And the same likely goes for Google and Microsoft.
    “We’re starting to see more of the large Internet content providers looking to build more of their own networks—whether they are leasing dark fiber or laying down new cables to build new routes,” says Michael Murphy, president and CEO of telecom consultancy NEF. “It makes sense.”
    In the past, Facebook has joined consortia that operate other undersea cables—groups typically made up of telecom companies—but this project is different. Rather than letting a group build and control the cable—that is, rather than sharing lines with others—the company is laying its own dedicated lines and it has the power to use them however it sees fit. In the end, this allows Facebook to expand its online empire much quicker than in the past. “The consortium model is much slower than what we would like,” Ahmad says.
    Much the same applies to Microsoft. That said, the two Internet giants aren’t abandoning the telecom industry altogether. The pair have brought in another partner: Telxius, a subsidiary of Spanish telecom Telefónica. Telxius will operate the cable, and Facebook and Microsoft services w

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  29. The Keymasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who controls the keys to this gigantic cable?
    They keep it for themselves.

  30. underwater cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Wired has an in-depth piece on it

    I see what you did there

  31. But still cant provide good internet by DaRyuujin · · Score: 1

    So they are doing this...but I STILL can't get anything better than DSL and I live in VA...right on the coast....

  32. Like the NSA,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd tap that...