The NSA's Delightfully D&D-inspired Guide To the Internet (muckrock.com)
"The NSA has a well-earned reputation for being one of the tougher agencies to get records out of, making those rare FOIA wins all the sweeter..." according to Muckrock.com, and "the fact that the records in question just so happen to be absolutely insane are just icing on the cake...." v3rgEz writes: In 2007, two NSA employees put together "Untangling the Web," the agency's official guide to scouring the World Wide Web. The 651-page guide cites Borges, Freud, and Ovid -- and that's just in the preface. MuckRock obtained a copy of the guide under an NSA Freedom of Information request, and has a write up of all the guide's amazing best parts.
They're calling it "the weirdest thing you'll read today".
They're calling it "the weirdest thing you'll read today".
D&D is nerd stuff if anything ever was. I daresay moreso than the internet itself.
This is brilliant misinformation. If the nsa is average, this is a mindblowimg example of bureaucratic cancer.
I don't mind the unnecessary use of graphemes like umlauts and tildes, but I do find the use of the German sharp s very silly.
But the fact that the author thinks that this manual is "weird" clearly puts him in tech newbie status
The parts that they highlighted came across to me as something that I would rather enjoy
You use SJW -> you are part of the problem. Idiot.
Liberal Arts majors need no longer restrict their job search to McDonald's, Burger King, etc.
quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.
This thing is so old that Amazon even sells it.
If MuckRock thinks that's the weirdest thing I'll read today, well, I guess I know one group that hasn't been tracking my browsing habits.
Yarrr im a mid 40s white male and mad about any social progress!!!
Wow. Usually they conceal their bullshit attempts to change public opinion at least slightly.
This site is part of this propaganda machine and you trust in more than you should.
stuff that matters.
Maybe he's actually right. Don't give these people audience, neither themself, nor by discussion their stuff, refuting, etc. Just ignore it.
Look around you, fuckface. If you think the quashing of free speech and third-wave feminism are "progress" in any form, you're the motherfucking problem.
The article uses scans (not even properly levelled, cropped and aligned) even though the document is available in digital form.
What a bunch of amateurs.
Maybe they find professionalism in editing as funny as philosophing about the Internet.