Slashdot Mirror


ASUS' ZenBook 3 Is Thinner, Lighter and Faster Than the MacBook (engadget.com)

At the ongoing Computex trade show in China, Asus unveiled the ZenBook 3 laptop. The ZenBook 3's chassis measures 11.9mm while the whole body weighs 910g. At the event, the company's executive said that ZenBook 3 is better than both MacBook Air and the 12-inch MacBook. As for the specifications, the ZenBook 3, which is crafted from aerospace-grade aluminum alloy, sports a 12.5-inch full-HD display (1920x1080 pixels), and offers up to Core i7 processor, 16GB of 2133MHz RAM, up to a 1TB PCIe Gen 3 x4 SSD, a next-gen USB Type-C port (for power and data transfer), powerful quad-speaker audio by Harman Kardon, and a fingerprint scanner. Do note that there is only one USB port on the device. The entry-level variant featuring Core i5 processor, 256GB of SSD and 4GB of RAM is priced at 999, while the top-of-the-line model will set you back by $1,999. Asus also had nice things to say about the keyboard, though Engadget's reporter was not impressed. More details here.

14 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. At this rate by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looking out how the great shrink has been progressing, I predict that that 12 inch MacBook Pro will completely disappear from this Universe in about a decade. You can still go out an buy it however since it will be infinitely thin and light, you won't be able see or use it.

    You'll just have to take Tim's word for it.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  2. Don't want a thinner laptop by caseih · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally I think laptops are thin enough, maybe too thin. I like the slightly thicker laptops because I find them easier to handle, plunk down, and open the lid. The macbook air amost requires a fingernail to open. Why not make the laptop 1/2" thick and stick a bigger battery in it? Thinness seems to be the latest trend in ADD fashion.

    I also don't want my phones to get any thinner. I always buy a case for my phones these days not because I need to protect the phone, but I want to make it a bit thicker so it's easier to handle and use.

  3. Not the point by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The MacBook already has mediocre battery life, and its case is pretty much solid battery except for the tiny logic board.

    So ASUS comes along, shrinks the case and puts in bigger and more power hungry CPU / RAM / SSD plus extra components like the mini CPU fan and Thunderbolt controller. Guess what's gonna give?

    It sounds like the original MacBook Air; great on paper but in reality a bunch of overpowered components packed in too little space, leading to crappy battery life, overheating and throttling.

    I realize everyone wants ultra-mobile devices these days, but if you're tethered to a charger it's not so mobile anymore, is it?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  4. Fuck this one port trend by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If skinny eliminates all but one USB port, fuck right off.

    I have the previous Zenbook and it has 3 ports. Too skinny for an Ethernet Jack, but I was willing to live with that. One USB port isn't enough.

    1. Re:Fuck this one port trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Making the goal to produce a computer as thin as a stick of gum and then requiring that users plug in a honkin' dongle to make it usable defeats a significant purpose in having a notebook computer. Wifi doesn't hold a candle to gigabit Ethernet when the cable is an available option and all of my USB devices require a USB-A connector.

  5. you're all chatting about a commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    enjoy your debate over paid advertising

  6. I used to be into Macs by wjcofkc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ten or so years ago I could not have imagined that someday I would not be a Mac user. OS X was part of my holy trinity of favorite operating systems. Linux had long since established it's mainstay, while FreeBSD was and is just plain fantastic as a server os.

    People argue that Apple's whole lineup was and continues to grow stale. This is true, but I personally have no allegiance to brands that put out an OS, I have allegiance to the operating systems. As the first few years of my fling with Apple OS, X seemed to be getting better and better. Minor UI tweaks, smaller and smaller OS. I'm going to get to into because I'm not here to give a review but there was a point for me personally where I felt they just kinda fucked up the whole gui. I was out.

    I am very particular of operating systems. I recently got a BlackBerry Classic (and yes I get maid fun of ) Everyone has asked why I didn't get the Priv. Then they are confused since I "Like BlackBerry" yet tell them if I was going to get an Android it would be a Samsung. I try to explain how it all about the os and what that means, but I only receive blank stares.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  7. 3 things by sootman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One: the PC vs Mac spec war is basically meaningless, because people who buy Macs want OS X, and people who buy PCs don't want OS X or don't care, and never the twain shall meet.

    Two: "At the event, the company's executive said that ZenBook 3 is better than both MacBook Air and the 12-inch MacBook... it sports a 12.5-inch full-HD display (1920x1080 pixels)..." -- OK then, it's NOT better than the 12" MacBook's 2304 x 1440 screen.

    Three: Remember when laptops were as big as a phone books? Like in the 166 MHz ThinkPad 380 days. BACK THEN, making them thinner and lighter was a worthy pursuit. But bragging that your laptop is 11.9mm thick instead of 13.2mm, and 910 grams vs. 920? WHO GIVES A SHIT! That's a difference of 1.3mm and the mass of two US five-cent coins. Are you fucking kidding me? Ugh. They're thin enough now. Quit making them thinner and put some battery or ports back in. (This goes for all OEMs, and double for Apple.)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  8. Re:Thunderbolt 3 USB-C Port =... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that little USB-C port is why you don't need any other ports.

    You shall be strangled in a necklace of dongles. Very slowly.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  9. Re:Needs a better screen by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I care about lighter, but not thinner.

    People don't buy Macbooks because they are lighter, or thinner, or faster. They buy them because they run Mac OS X.

  10. Re:Needs a better screen by gnasher719 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People don't buy Macbooks because they are lighter, or thinner, or faster. They buy them because they run Mac OS X.

    But then they have the choice between different models, and buy different models depending on whether they want fast, light, or cheap.

    But you are right, this won't move people from buying a MacBook to buying an ASUS laptop. It will move some people from buying a heavy Windows laptop to buying an ASUS laptop.

  11. Re:Thinner and lighter is not always desirable... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dot buy new. go find a used 2012 and get the best macbook pro ever made.

    My 2012 is as fast as anything sold today. and it is faster than the Piece of shit Lenovo 5th gen i7 laptop work bought me. Sad that lenovo only makes garbage now.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Re:Not from where I'm looking by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    people (who aren't programmers looking for a Unix that works) buy Mac books because they're a Veblen good. At least that was the reason my college bound kid had when pressed for it.

    Well, Macs don't have systemd - so their Unix is obviously broken anyway.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. Seems like a step backwards by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to sidestep the PC vs Mac comparison, let's compare this to its predecessor the UX305CA.

    UX305: $699, Core M, 8 MB RAM, 13.3" 1080p matte IPS screen (option for 3200x1800) covering 90% of sRGB, 256GB SSD, 3xUSB 3.0, mini HDMI, 12.3mm height, 1.192kg, 45 Wh battery giving 6+ hours. About the only thing it was missing was a backlit keyboard and a fan.

    Zenbook 3: $999, Core i5, 4 MB RAM, 1080p IPS screen (implied touchscreen), 256GB PCIe SSD, 1xUSB 3.1/Thunderbolt, presumably HDMI via Thunderbolt, 11.9mm, 0.910kg, supposedly 9 hour battery though I usually reduce claims to 2/3 which would put it at 6 hours. Backlit keyboard, has a fan.

    The UX305 was a worthy ultrabook that I've been recommending to a lot of people who otherwise would've settled for a low-end laptop. Usually their budget was around $500, while the UX305 frequently went on sale for $600 - the size, build, SSD, screen, and generous number of ports made it an easy up-sell for an extra $100. The Core M processor isn't a limitation for most people's computer use.

    The new Zenbook 3 comes in at an extra $300 putting it out of reach of budget shoppers. It has a better CPU but lower base RAM, a faster SSD but only people doing video editing will notice the extra speed, loses all those ports (many people I know leave a nano receiver plugged in and use a wireless mouse), shaves a little off the weight and height, and has a backlit keyboard. Honestly, that doesn't seem worth an extra $300.